Slashdot Mirror


Consumerist Says AT&T Site Won't Sell iPhone In NYC, Citing Network

cowp writes "A Consumerist tipster couldn't get AT&T's website to sell him an iPhone when he shopped using an NYC ZIP code, but could when he tried other cities' ZIPs. Consumerist asked an AT&T CSR and seems to have gotten confirmation that this is carrier policy: 'Yes, this is correct the phone is not offered to you because New York is not ready for the iPhone. You don't have enough towers to handle the phone.' Considering Apple's gadget is currently the most popular handset in the US, its exclusive carrier's inability/unwillingness to support the device in the country's largest market is pretty huge news. If this proves true, I'd expect curtains for AT&T's exclusivity deal when it comes up for renewal." If you're in NYC, can you confirm or deny this outlandish-sounding claim? Updated 20091227 1:03 GMT by timothy: Headline, now corrected, inaccurately named Apple rather than AT&T. Mea culpa.

94 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. This has been an issue for quite awhile. by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's been a lot of coverage indicating problems with iPhones in New York, including one Gizmodo piece saying a 30% dropped call rate is apparently normal.

    1. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This from the most technological advanced country on the planet.....

      AT&T happy to take customers money, not willing to spend millions for a working network.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by dov_0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This from the most technological advanced country on the planet.....

      AT&T happy to take customers money, not willing to spend millions for a working network.

      I didn't see any mention of Japan in TFA?

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    3. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by aztektum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must be referring to either Japan or South Korea, right?

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    4. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by WankersRevenge · · Score: 4, Informative

      Back in 2004, I quit my job and went on a roadtrip on steroids. I drove from Mexico to Alaska, down to Texas, up to the Dakotas, and finally back home to Massachusetts. I was an AT&T wireless customer and I was stunned at the lack of coverage. I could only talk near major cities if I were lucky. Even then, calls were being dropped every other call. Their coverage charts were such BS. I quit my service once I got home, and switched to another provider, experiencing only minor irritations on subsequent road trips.

    5. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by jonoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      The same South Korea that took over two years to get the iPhone. And the same SK that still blocks any non-Korean approved unlocked phone from being used on their networks without paying a $300 "inspection" fee? And the same SK where the majority of domestic websites require Internet Explorer 6 (yes, 6) to function correctly?

      For those of you who don't know, South Korea is not a technological paradise. We have fast broadband but that's about it.

    6. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many Americans seem to think their country is the best and most advanced in the world. They are brainwashed by the mass media's propaganda.

    7. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that would be the *other* South Korea

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    8. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by acedotcom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      uhhh...i hate to rain on your parade...but isnt "3 or 4" dropped calls pretty much around your own quoted number of 30%?

      --
      they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
    9. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by mister_playboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in 2004, I quit my job and went on a roadtrip on steroids.

      ... because you wanted to have the opportunity to road rage and 'roid rage simultaneously?

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    10. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, you should also show them your travel permit, and remember to be nice and polite as you pass through the checkpoints.

    11. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Khyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bullshit.

      I called Wells Fargo before my last cross-country trip - They immediately locked me from $2,000 daily limit to $200, I got stranded because I filled up for gas and then had not enough left for the rest of the day to cover my hotel expenses - I had to sleep in my car in the freezing cold in a fucking parking lot.

      And when they said they raised it back up - they lied. They cut it down to $150.

      Of course, as soon as I got back, I withdrew all of my money and made a very loud statement in the lobby to all of the customers present. I think two followed my suit.

      You tell them you're going around the country, they'll lock your shit down so you don't make THEM off-balance. They're the ones playing dirty with your money. What, you ain't seen the bailout?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a cheap Verison phone and it has dropped a call once in the past 2 years. Why would you use something that drops calls at all ?

    13. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This from the most technological advanced country on the planet.....

      AT&T happy to take customers money, not willing to spend millions for a working network.

      You forgot the sarcasm tag I'm hoping. The US is not the most technologically advanced country in North America let alone the planet. While AT&T was slowly rolling out 7.2, your neighbours to the North were rolling out 21Mbps HSDPA on the incumbent GSM carrier. While Verizon was busy coming up with clever ads to attack AT&T, Canadian CDMA carriers were getting ready to launch a coast to coast 21 Mbps HSDPA network and launch the iPhone 3GS on their network making the iPhone non-exclusive in Canada. A lot of technology that you take for granted every day was invented in Canada. The robotic arm used to construct the international space station was from Canada.

      BTW. How is that LTE thing going for Verizon? Will we see come out before 2020?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    14. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you. My response was to Khyber who said it was bullshit to tell the credit card company that you were travelling to circumvent them declining your card. Even so, a simple phone call would clear it up.

      It is a good idea for various reasons to have a backup, and not have all the money you eat and survive with locked up into a single bank.

      I agree for credit, but I dont agree for general banking. I have all my money in a single bank, including car and home insurance, stock investments as well as mortgage and line or credit. I've had nothing but outstanding service from them over the last 20 years, and for my reward I currently have my home mortgage at 1.45%. Loyalty has its rewards. I do however have several credit cards from other institutions that I can draw on in an emergency.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    15. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...where the majority of domestic websites require Internet Explorer 6 (yes, 6) to function correctly?

      Well, that seemed to be the case in the US until just recently too... ;-)

    16. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF? Seriously? Why do Canadians always bring up that arm as if it is the greatest piece of technology ever invented when it is sitting next to a $10 billion Orbiter and a $100 billion space station, which are some of the greatest marvels of technology ever invented?

      People really are dipshits with this "my country is more advanced than yours" idiocy. Advances in technology can only be compared with time, not locations. The rate of development of technology in the US is extremely high--but this doesn't mean that the technology is deployed there. Is a country like Japan more advanced than the US because it builds more hardware and software or is the US more advanced because it designs more? Or should we compare per capita?

      I think it is a foolish thing to even worry about. Only nationalists would really care. I care about the technology, not who is the most 'advanced'.

      The blue diode, the microprocessor, scramjets, the LHC--those are important. I don't give a shit which country gets the nationalistic props for being the most technologically advanced.

    17. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, the South Korea that wanted strong (128-bit) encryption back when IE was the only browser worth mentioning, but 128-bit encryption couldn't be exported. They implemented their own encryption scheme as an ActiveX pugin, and open source browsers have been really slow about implementing a compatible form of that encryption system.

      To me, that sounds like a country that was quite tech savvy, but got screwed by US politics.

    18. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by EdIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How far they have fallen. I used to be die hard AT&T. Between 93-98 I had an old Nokia TDMA cell phone with a freaking brick on the back for a battery.

      My talk time was like 3-4 fucking days. I forgot my charger one time on a trip and it lasted on standby and just a little bit of talking two weeks. I shit you not.

      I was once out on a camping trip in the middle of nowhere (probably 20 miles away from the interstate) and I was the only person with a cell signal. Made calls and everything. People were dumbfounded that I was on my cell phone considering how far away I was.

      2009.......

      I am ready to strangle people with iPhones on AT&T. It is such a joke. From Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Houston, and New York, I talk to people with crappy sound, disconnects within about 3-4 minutes (90% of the time), and pure constant frustration trying to communicate with these people.

      They still love the iPhone though.

      What I have learned is two things.

      1) How far you can fall in terms of customer satisfaction and real world coverage and performance. (Not flaming here, these are my direct observations).
      2) How much shit people will put up with for a shiny iPhone.

      P.S - The iPhone does not look that bad. Jailbroken and on TMobile or Verizon (hopefully soon because CDMA will finally be available) it might be pretty nice to work with.

    19. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ActiveX plugin dates to the days of IE4, long before Firefox, and pretty much contemporaneous with the open-sourcing of Netscape. This was the height of Microsoft's illegal tactics in the browser wars, and there were no mainstream open-source browsers.

      Why the government didn't fund the development of compatible open systems, I don't know, but it was certainly many years before there was significant demand.

    20. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The rate of development of technology in the US is extremely high--but this doesn't mean that the technology is deployed there.

      Therefore the country where it IS deployed is the more advanced. When I moved to the US from Europe I was amazed at how technologically backwards the place was considering the huge amount of tech development that goes on there. The amount and type of technology you encounter in everyday life is certainly far behind Europe and now living in Canada things are more advanced, but still not quite as much as Europe. Its true that some of the newest gadgets may get released in the US first but when it comes to applying technology to existing products (like the car) the US is surprisingly far behind.

    21. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Neoprofin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just got back from 9 months overseas withdrawing large amounts of cash in about two dozen different countries, sometimes in multiple countries and currencies in the same day. I had to have my card replaced twice as well. They were never anything but helpful beyond not being able to ship the cards overseas forcing me to use an intermediary.

      If telling them I was going on vacation got them to not cut off my card I don't know what you did to piss off the gods of banking but it looks like the problem may have been with you.

    22. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also call bullshit.

      When I went from the US to Australia in 2002, all it took was one phone call to Wells Fargo (via an international toll-free number) to sort things out. After the initial lockout and re-enabling, I used that card in Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, and Italy without further issues.

      I continued to use the account for another 4-5 years after deciding to stay on in Oz. Got WF to change my statement address to my place in Brisbane, and they even automatically sent me a replacement card a month or so before the old one was due to expire.

      Sounds to me as though someone maybe got their knickers in a knot over having to prove their identity to the bank's satisfaction — providing info that WF almost certainly already had in any case.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    23. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wrist rocket? Are you Iron Man?

    24. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by ihavnoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The same South Korea that took over two years to get the iPhone. And the same SK that still blocks any non-Korean approved unlocked phone from being used on their networks without paying a $300 "inspection" fee? And the same SK where the majority of domestic websites require Internet Explorer 6 (yes, 6) to function correctly?

      For those of you who don't know, South Korea is not a technological paradise. We have fast broadband but that's about it.

      To be fair, the $300 inspection fee is for getting *any* device certified by the FCC-equivalent authority of Korea *for personal use*. To make sure that the device does't interfere with the government-authorized spectrum. You should blame (insert company name) for not doing the job for you, not the South Korean government. Hell, what kind of government authorize using non-certified devices in their soverign?

      Additionally, I use IE8 and firefox, and I had zero hiccups using IE8, and nearly zero problem using Firefox except on-line gaming sites (which merely is a Windows game installer) and banks (which require so many addons). Everything else is fine.

    25. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, i got stung by an automated anti-fraud system when i tried to book a flight ticket (relatively large purchase), had to call up the card provider and explain that i really did want to go there..
      Then when i arrived, my card again got suspended because i was using it out of my normal country, in the place i had just bought a ticket to and told them all about it. I then had to pay exorbitant phone charges to call them and explain again.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    26. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by adisakp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I visited New York last year, my iPhone was acting really weird. Heating up, battery dying quickly, not being able to see signal, calls dropping and very slow data rate. I thought my phone was screwed up because it was fairly new. As soon as I got back to IL, it went back to normal though. Then I saw the same problem with lack of signal / batter dying quickly when I went to big street fairs or events in Chicago that had tens or hundreds of thousands of people. At a couple events with maybe on 40K people), I couldn't even send Text Messages because the AT&T network was bonked. My solution was to turn off 3G and all of a sudden, my phone would behave normally again in these high crowd situations. I think that when 3G is saturated, the iPhone wastes a lot of battery trying to connect back to the Cell towers.

    27. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Fallen+Seraph · · Score: 2, Funny

      But hey, I guess you're too ignorant to think maybe the sheer amount of skyscrapers and concrete in NY would be one major cause of insufficient ability to handle calls.

      Really? Cause as a NYC resident, my Sprint service works just fine all over the city. I've never dropped a call here when above ground. Neither has my best friend on Verizon (we have the Pre and Droid, respectively). The latter actually switched back to Verizon only a month ago and ditched his iPhone because he couldn't take the crappy service he was getting with AT&T. This is basically an issue with AT&T not having enough towers and repeaters in the city to handle the traffic.

      PS - As a Jew, I find the accusations of some of the posts above outlandish. I mean, they've never mentioned the NSA wiretapping thing at our Jew meetings... only the mind control :P

    28. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by jo42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A real insult to a Canadian is to point out that almost 100% of Canada is north of Buffalo, New York...

    29. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by dov_0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't usually bother replying to AC's, but this guy has that peculiar mix of naivety, stupidity and arrogance that just really gets up my nose.

      Japan is NOT more advanced, it seams that people fall for this so easily these days.

      I agree. It's so easy to look at the newer motorway infrastructure, the artificial islands for new development, the brilliant, wonderfully advanced and incredibly efficient public transport systems that the US can hardly dream of matching and of course the newer comms infrastructure and be fooled into thinking Japan is an incredibly advanced modern nation.

      Do they have any reputable universities ?

      Ummm, well, yes. Only problem is that they teach in Japanese - so they can't really be teaching anything important, could they?

      Do they have cutting edge biotech, nano or healthcare facilities ?

      Don't you keep up with tech news?

      Do they walked on the moon or have significant space presence ?

      Well, yes actually, they do have quite a significant space presence.

      Yes, they do have some neat electronics, but it runs our licensed tech. like those CPU chips, Wii runs IBM-CPU and ATI chip, similar PS3 uses IBM and nVidia technology. They licence most of the stuff from the west.

      Standards are standards and cheap readily available chips are a sound commercial decision. You will also notice however who many big Western companies use Motorola chips for instance.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    30. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just visited Hoboken, NJ. I had one good call out of 4, on average. Most were dropped with high-frequency garbage, like a corrupted MP3. No issues like that in Indiana.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    31. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by bsane · · Score: 2, Informative

      Standards are standards and cheap readily available chips are a sound commercial decision. You will also notice however who many big Western companies use Motorola chips for instance.

      What does that have to do with it? Or were you under the impression that Motorola was Japanese?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorolla

    32. Re:This has been an issue for quite awhile. by LitelySalted · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People tend to forget that NEED is the real motivation behind technological advances and implementation. Japan, for example, has a high need to handle transit, housing, and recreation within their limited space and with a high population density. Therefore, Japan's need has compelled them to implement technology to handle these limitations. Such examples can be seen in their train infrastructure or space efficient housing.

      On the other hand, the United States’ need for the same technology is not as high. Generally speaking, our space constraints are not as limiting and we don't have such a high population density that mass public transit has becomes a necessity rather than a convenience, thus we have large automobiles and expansive houses. The same examples can be drawn for most of the developed world. The transit system in Europe is more developed because the price of gasoline as a commodity is higher - they have a need for a cheaper alternative.

      To think that one country is leaps and bounds ahead of others is naive. There are no countries full of Cowboy Astronaut Millionaires. With how globally tied together our countries have become, technological advances tend to propagate worldwide in a year or two, taking into account social and political considerations - the only exception to the trend is military technology.

  2. Spin by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we stop saying things like 'the most popular handset?' When we're talking about a market where no single handset has more than about 1-2% market share, saying 'the most popular' is entirely meaningless.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Spin by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everybody outside of the tech world knows what an iPhone is.

      Not everybody outside of the tech world knows what the E55, Hero, or GW620 are.

    2. Re:Spin by XPeter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everybody outside of the tech world knows what an iPhone is.

      Not everybody outside of the tech world knows what the E55, Hero, or GW620 are.

      True, but promisingly I've been seeing a lot of my non-tech friends carrying around new Android devices lately.

      --
      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Spin by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's global smartphone market share. Show a graph with global market share of ALL wireless handsets, not just smartphones.

      --
      Gone!
    4. Re:Spin by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK, so the iPhone is 4%, Raven64 said 1-2%. He's within 50% of the mark.

      Pretty good for 'ol Slashdot. He's within an order of magnitude.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Spin by master811 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That chart is rubbish. They've grouped all the iPhones into one model, yet all the other phone makes are split up. Looks like Apple paid Nielson to do some fiddling.....

    6. Re:Spin by mlts · · Score: 4, Informative

      People are wising up though. The Droid's marketing campaign just hasn't gotten people into VZW's doors, it has spurred interest in Android devices in general. I've talked with people who see the Droid, find it interesting, but prefer T-Mobile, and end up coming out with a Samsung Behold, a Motorola Cliq, or a MyTouch 3G. People on Sprint find that the Samsung Moment offers one of the fastest processors. The only carrier that has no current offering is AT&T, but supposedly they will be offering a Dell Android phone. AT&T also has the iPhone, so just business common sense says that Android devices will be second fiddle to AT&T's mainstay.

    7. Re:Spin by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It says "iPhone 3G," one specific model of the iPhone. The other phones and their models, however, are grouped together. See the parenthesis?

    8. Re:Spin by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Note that for the purpose of market share calculations, smartphones and 'feature phones' are counted as different things. A 'feature phone' is basically something that would have been called a smartphone a couple of years ago (phones are often relaunched with small tweaks for the new classification when newer models are introduced). When people talk about the iPhone having a certain percentage of the smartphone market, they aren't splitting the market into 'things that are just simple phones' and 'complicated phones.' The smartphone designation only covers the top end of what most people would think of as a smartphone.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Spin by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While this is true, having my shop right next to a coffee and sandwich shop I get to see folks from just about every age and demographic and I'd say Nokia is is the most popular, but of course that is a range of phones and not a single brand. In fact the only demographic I've seen that seems to favor the iPhone over the Nokia here is the 19-21 year old college males, but then again they are also the ones more likely to be sitting there on a Macbook too.

      But everybody else, from the teenage girls to the blue haired ladies, the teen guys to the old "Billy Joe Bobs", all seem to be carrying Nokia. So while it seems that while everyone has heard of the iPhone at least in my anecdotal observations it is college males that are the ones picking it up, although the business majors seem to prefer the Crackberry.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Spin by Nyall · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to be a bit of a fanboy, but I got a Moment because it has an OLED screen. I was sick of my previous phone being unusable in sunlight. The slide out keyboard with primary number keys is also nice.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    11. Re:Spin by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might notice that AT&T commercials never promote the iPhone. They always promote some other smart phone.

      I'm sure they'll get into the Android game soon enough.

      And I look forward to the 4G iPhone in June.

      And Google's new phone.

      Boy, 2010 should be an interesting year.

    12. Re:Spin by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, but in most cases Australian GSM systems are microwaved back to the exchange, particularly so in metropolitan areas - it's utterly trivial and cheap to throw more bandwidth at the problem until throughput is no longer an issue, though the hard limit like you said is the radio spectrum - they get around this issue by using a smaller cell footprint. Starbucks will be serviced with its own discreet set of antennas, while Seattle's Best right next door does exactly the same. The two coexist happily. The problem you have now though is that starbucks might have an alliance with Telstra, while next door went with Optus instead - there is a ton of money exchanging hands behind the scenes. It's not just telco greed these days :-(

      GSM voice is never allocated more than 16kbps in the bearer - pretty frequently they use 8kbps The vocoders vary between almost nothing up to about 13kbps. With compression (bog standard DTX or whatever) you can pack hundreds of voice signals down the trunk without issue. Voice is dying though :-) These days most trunks are almost entirely packet switched data - this sucks for the telco's since they can't bask in all the free money they get from voice and text, they have to actually provide a tangible chunk of spectrum for the end user. They are kicking and screaming every step of the way.

    13. Re:Spin by Eil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can we stop saying things like 'the most popular handset?' When we're talking about a market where no single handset has more than about 1-2% market share, saying 'the most popular' is entirely meaningless.

      Assuming the figures are correct, the link in the summary states that the top four have more than 2% each and the iPhone is #1. I think that qualifies as "the most popular," even if it doesn't have a majority on marketshare.

    14. Re:Spin by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How different are those grouped models? I noticed there are four LG series each listed separately. Perhaps some companies have slightly different model numbers as part of a deal with other companies. I've noticed Walmart, for instance, often will get a unique camera that is really just the same as a differently numbered model but gets better pricing, maybe a different color and prevents someone else from entering into a price matching war with them.

      I mean, they clumped the iPhone 3G 8GB with the iPhone 3G 16GB...perhaps that's the equivalent of grouping the LG CU915 with the CU920, for instance.

  3. No problems last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in NYC under a 114xx zip code and had no problems buying one in person at an ATT store. I bought it the weekend after Thanksgiving so it was about a month ago. Maybe they changed it since then.

  4. I'm a little confused here... by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are the exact implications of the iPhone's failure to make it there (NY) as opposed to making it anywhere else?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:I'm a little confused here... by iamapizza · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clearly, this is a devastating experience for aforementioned individual, as they are unable to procure an iphone. In fact, there is a potential that an entire city may be denied the presence of the iphone. Here at slashdot, we feel their pain.

      --
      Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    2. Re:I'm a little confused here... by digitalchinky · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's like a ghost town compared to a few Asian cities. Light traffic, hardly any people, clear air, you could almost eat off the concrete. :-)

      I live in Manila, we have 10,500 people per square kilometer across the metro on average, though some of the slum areas are as high as 40k - and yes, they all have cell phones - we send 140 billion text messages a year, the entire country is bathed in 3.5G, surprisingly you can actually get the juicy speed goodness anywhere at any time too, so the telco drones must be doing something right.

  5. Fix the headline? by Shag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Summary makes it clear it's AT&T that isn't selling the iPhone in New York City. Headline says it's Apple, who last time I checked have iPhones for sale in their New York City stores. :)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Fix the headline? by zentechno · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.att.com/ --> Wireless --> Shop/Cell Phones --> PDAs and Smartphones --> iPhone 3G. Opening the (last) iPhone link in another tab prompts me for my zip, followed by "not available in your area", *then* refreshing the list of phones in the previous tab *removes* iPhone from the listing.

      --
      âoeThe wall between art and engineering exists only in our minds.â -- Theo Jansen
  6. Re:Most popular handset is false. by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nope. It's the most popular phone in the US based on units sold. 4% of the market.

    That's almost 10% better than the best BB. 75% better than the entire RAZR V3 line.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  7. I work, literally, right in Times Square... by Bourdain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and both my phone (an at&t blackberry) and my coworker's iphone cannot make or receive calls indoors (despite having an allegedly strong signal of -80 or higher)

  8. Cellular Nazi says: by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Funny

    No iPhone for You!

  9. Re:AT&T's service is crap by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interestingly, here in rural Alaska we get at least 20% dropped iPhone calls. After a particularly annoying one (I was within 200 yards of the tower, line of sight, over water) I complained to the local AT&T rep and the FCC.

    About 2 weeks later, I got this nice call from an AT&T droid who says he was asked by the FCC to look into this. After a few pleasantries, he suggested 1) Making sure the battery was charged (OK), 2) Turning off 3G (already done, don't have 3G here in the boonies) and getting closer to the tower. I explained that if I got any closer to the tower on the last dropped call, I'd have to marry it.

    His final suggestion was to take it up with Apple, maybe I needed a new handset.

    I suppose it's something of a start but AT&T isn't going to solve very much of the problem this way.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  10. This is exactly why I have an iPhone by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not because it's the best phone available, which it might or might not be depending on who you ask, but because there's a guy in Cupertino with a black turtleneck, a borrowed liver, and a really shitty attitude who owns the exact same phone I do, and who has the power to make it suck less.

    Even if he has to stare down AT&T to do it.

    What other phone manufacturer can go to bat for their customers like that?

    1. Re:This is exactly why I have an iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not because it's the best phone available, which it might or might not be depending on who you ask, but because there's a guy in Cupertino with a black turtleneck, a borrowed liver, and a really shitty attitude who owns the exact same phone I do, and who has the power to make it suck less.

      Even if he has to stare down AT&T to do it.

      What other phone manufacturer can go to bat for their customers like that?

      Except he hasn't done anything about it, nor is there any indication that Apple will do anything. Why did they even sign an exclusivity deal in the first place if they cared about the service?

    2. Re:This is exactly why I have an iPhone by Minwee · · Score: 4, Insightful
    3. Re:This is exactly why I have an iPhone by Nyall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Has Mr Jobs managed to stare down ATT into improving their network ?

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    4. Re:This is exactly why I have an iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      As I understand it, SteveJobsCanSuckMyDick is an amazing product and does an excellent job of recovering data from iPods.

  11. Re:Utter fantasy by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Informative

    Must be April 1, as there are more places to buy the iPhone in NY than in just about any other place.

    Unless you're trying to buy one online via AT&T's site.

  12. Fix the title by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The title says Apple wont sell it (which is wrong they most certainly will) the ARTICLE has the real culprit, AT&T, which is really who wont sell it. My coworker couldnt get a iPhone for her girlfriend at all from AT&T in the NYC area, but had no problems with Apple selling it to her.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  13. Re:You insensitive clod! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where the hell am I gonna get me a candy-bar at this our?

    Start nibbling on your phone?

    There's an app for that.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  14. Don't bash AT&T by astrashe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is responsible -- they don't have enough towers, and they shouldn't be selling any more phones until they build more capacity.

    It's not any different than not selling additional seats on an airplane that's already full. No one would blame an airline for not overbooking. I don't think we should blame AT&T for doing the right thing.

    As a New Yorker with an iPhone, I hope Apple follows suit and stops selling iPhones to New Yorkers until the network is robust enough to provide decent service.

    Failing that, I think they should waive early termination fees for NYC users.

    1. Re:Don't bash AT&T by astrashe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The phone is surprisingly popular, and no one has a crystal ball.

      For most products, there's some sort of limit on how much you can sell, that's connected to how many of them you make.

      Southwest can only fly so many people to a certain destination, a bakery can only sell so many cupcakes, a barber can only take so many appointments, a restaurant only has so many tables, etc.

      Sometimes popular products and services sell out -- it's a very common situation in business.

      There is a limit on the number of iPhones the AT&T network can support. The exact number is fuzzy, but there's no doubt that they've gone beyond it here in NYC. They should just say that they're sold out until they grow the network.

      Again, it's not any different than a restaurant declining to take a reservation because they're full. Respectable businesses do this all the time. It's perfectly reasonable.

    2. Re:Don't bash AT&T by JobyKSU · · Score: 2, Informative

      Again, it's not any different than a restaurant declining to take a reservation because they're full. Respectable businesses do this all the time. It's perfectly reasonable.

      Well, if the the restaurant is required to find some place for you to sit or stand quietly while ordering what you want and eating it, then this is an accurate analogy. In the US, cell phone providers are not allowed to refuse service - even for creditworthiness - unless you already owe them money. Since the iPhone is the biggest reason for AT&T subscriber growth over the past year or so, this is simply their way to cope with a drastically overloaded network and limit the number of new subscribers in NYC.

    3. Re:Don't bash AT&T by bennini · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's not any different than a restaurant declining to take a reservation because they're full. Respectable businesses do this all the time. It's perfectly reasonable.

      If AT&T is either unwilling or unable to provide network support to keep up with consumer demand for the iPhone, then their exclusivity deal should be nullified. I'm surprised the contract they signed with Apple does not include some provisions for dealing with this sort of situation.

      This is exactly why exclusivity deals are bad. People in NY are now stuck with either buying an iPhone and having shitty service or not buying an iPhone.

    4. Re:Don't bash AT&T by Comen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that it is responsible, to not sell more of something when you can not support the customers. But AT&T simply has not kept up with their network while making tons of money off the iPhone. After working for several Telecoms and Cable companies I will tell you infrastructure costs are not as high as they like you to think "if it is built well the first time" but just like roads they build for today and throw more at it later, then they cry cause it cost so much later, while engineers pull their hair out. These companies need to put money back in the network instead of their pockets more than likely. If AT&T can not keep up with the demand they know is coming, with such a big push in the mobile market, then they should be held responsible by their customers. What of people who travel to NYC and expect usable service.

  15. Re:AT&T's service is crap by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "His final suggestion was to take it up with Apple, maybe I needed a new handset."

    Go back to the FCC and resubmit your complaint. Obviously AT&T simply read you the script to meet the barest of "compliance" requirements...by sending you to some script reader in a call center. They won't do jack shit until the FCC requires them to. Or, you're able to find someone within the local ranks at ATT that are willing to listen to you, not just some corporate weenie.

  16. Re:AT&T's service is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually you may have been too close. I am far from a wireless engineer but I do know that depending on the antennas used the base of a tower can be a dead zone. I've seen this in the wireless ISP world a few times and its frustrating.

  17. Money well spent by Dracos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AT&T's choices:

    1. Sue Verizon and produce new commercials with Owen Wilson to combat PR damage.
    2. Increase network capacity.

    Did they choose wisely? I think not.

  18. Re:False by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you happen to try buying it online from the AT&T store? Because you would not have been able to. They aren't selling it.

    The title was wrong, but the summary and story are both correct. It's getting bad if people can't even bother to read the whole summary.

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  19. Could be the phone... by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My phone will show 5 bars of reception but it will throw "no service" warnings when I try to make calls.

    Not saying it isn't AT&T's fault but there is a highly non-zero chance the problem is with your phone instead. I've been an AT&T customer for over a decade (from back when they were AT&T Wireless before they became Cingular) so I'm pretty familiar with the good and bad about them. Whenever I've seen something like what you describe, a reboot of my phone has usually fixed the problem. I've also had cases where I couldn't get calls but other people with different phones could get calls standing right next to me. The problem turned out to be a wonky Nokia phone which I fixed by getting a new phone. Service didn't change but if the radio in the phone is broken (software or hardware) you can be standing next to a working tower and it won't matter.

    You said you use basic phones so there is a good chance those phones are made as cheaply as possible. Wouldn't surprise me if a few corners got cut on the testing... Of course it could just be AT&T having crap service where you like too...

  20. Re:AT&T's service is crap by rec9140 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "AT&T's service is crap"

    correct.

    BUT...

    You could be standing under the tower and your phone not work.

    Its called site geometry you actually could have a dead spot in certain areas that are very close to the tower and even in plain sight, including directly at the site.

    Just because you see one tower, its not ONE cell site. Depending on the location and the needs for that are it could be upto 6 sites depending on the sectorization used at that location. Most are 3 at a minimum, 120 degree sectorization. As you move into the urban area, and to meet other coverage needs it can go down to about 60 degrees.

    this applies to all RADIO systems, which cell phones are nothing more than radio systems.

    --
    1311393600 - Back to Black
  21. A Few Good Men by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe that CSR just watched A Few Good Men.

    AT&T: You want coverage?
    Consumerist: I think I have the towers.
    AT&T: You want coverage?
    Consumerist: I want the iPhone!
    AT&T: You can't handle the iPhone!!

  22. I live in NYC by idiot900 · · Score: 2

    Weird. I live in Manhattan and lots of people have iPhones.

    1. Re:I live in NYC by RobVB · · Score: 3, Funny

      Weird indeed. I've been to Manhattan, and there are lots of towers.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  23. AT&T won't sell on-line to NYC because of frau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to an AT&T CSR questioned in The Consumerist comments.

    Joseph W.: Welcome to AT&T online Sales support. How may I assist you with placing your order today?
    Joseph W.: Which one, the 3gs?
    Peter: Yes
    Peter: It says "There are no phones and devices that match your search criteria."
    Joseph W.: It is because you are in New York City.
    Peter: What does that mean?
    Joseph W.: Due to massive fraud in online ordering, iPhones are not available online only.
    Joseph W.: They can be bought in stores only.
    Peter: Oh, ok

  24. It's true by supersat · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might be able to buy an iPhone in NYC, but you can't from AT&T's web site.

    Try for yourself!

    1. Go to http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phones/cell-phones.jsp
    2. If you're outside of NYC, you'll see "Showing 69 standard phones or devices" and the iPhones listed immediately below.
    3. Change your zip code to 10101 by clicking Update next to your location in the upper-right corner.
    4. Now notice that it says "Showing 65 standard phones or devices." The iPhones are nowhere to be found.

    Now, the reason that the CSR gave for iPhone being unavailable might not be correct, but you certainly can't buy an iPhone from the AT&T website in NYC.

  25. Re:AT&T's service is crap by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's not how Apple works. They don't stick the best technology in something; they make very good technology do amazing things. Very few of their products are fully decked out - iPod shuffle doesn't have controls, the Air only has 1 USB port, etc.

    But each product does amazing things with what it has.

    The next iPhone won't be some amalgamation of every cool technology out there, but rather a careful selection of a few choice technologies that will work together.

  26. Re:AT&T's service is crap by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was in an Apple store over Christmas and watched 3 different people come in and complain about reception on their iPhones. All 3 were given new phones without any hassel from the Apple store employees. You should at least try that and possibly get a new phone.

  27. Re:iPhone Market Stats by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yeah, it's not like they make a phone with 32gb, expandable to 64gb, a 640x360 24 bit touchscreen, 5mp camera, support for TV/component out, HSDPA, Wifi, BT 2.0, capable of 640x480 30fps video recording, FM radio and transmitter, real GPS, compass, VOIP/SIP support...

    Oh wait, they do.

  28. My prediction. by Archeopteryx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In late January, when every pundit expects an Apple Tablet rollout, what will be rolled out is another Apple phone - perhaps not called an iPhone - which is not tied to the AT&T network.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
  29. It's about fraud prevention by BearRanger · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not all AT&T phone reps are equally versed in what's going on, as Consumerist later admits on their site. AT&T will sell you the iPhone in their stores throughout NYC. They won't sell you the phone online within NYC. Apparently this is because of fraudulent resales as people order the phones online, take delivery and then ship them overseas. Skipping out on the contracts in the process, as they never intended to honor them in the first place.

    I wonder why NYC has more of a problem with this than other locations. Large transient international population I suppose...

  30. iPhone vs everything else by EricX2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do all AT&T Wireless phones drop calls in New York City or just iPhones? What about an unlocked iPhone on T-Mobile?

    1. Re:iPhone vs everything else by Mister+Xiado · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd say a good 97% of all dropped call complaints on AT&T come from iPhone users. Not that I keep score, but every time I hear "customer is getting poor signal, dropped calls", I immediately think "another damn iPhone call". I'd assume unlocked iPhones work well, because odds are, they're not connected to UMTS towers much of the time. It's the phone. It's been trash since day zero, when Apple didn't supply AT&T with any documentation on the original iPhone until five minutes before launch, making for a lot of fun for everybody trying to activate the hockey pucks. Did you know that all the Visual Voicemail breakdown crap this past summer was from Apple pooping out repeated failed updates, jamming up iPhones that hadn't even been updated? Check Settings, General. If you have "Profile" listed there, surprise! Delete the corrupted AT&T profile and watch your messages roll in after two minutes. Also, anybody who knows how cell phones work knows better than to expect uninterrupted calls while driving. You're playing tarzan between towers. There isn't always a long vine in reach. Unless you're doing 120.

  31. Insightful? You're an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Says the man who repeats the mantra of the liberal, pinning all their problems on some abstract idea of a colaborative and archetypal villain named "the mass media". There is no collaboration amongst them, they are not trying to brainwash you, or anyone else, instead they are trying to appeal to you, to watch them. In this way, they are a reflection of you. When you understand that there are no super villain's, nobody cares about you, and it's extremely hard to organize a group to do ANYTHING in even the best of situations, then you will come to the realization that these abstract concepts you create to define your super smart group compared to the other super stupid group, are extremely arbitrary and do not reflect reality in the least bit.

    I think you'll find "many" citizens think their country is the best and most advanced in the world, given you don't come from an third world country. This is called patriotism, it's not particularly good, however suggesting that some out group ("Americans") are somehow worse than your ingroup, means you're doing the exact same thing.

    Basically, what I'm saying is, you're an idiot, and are displaying the very biases and failures in logic that you're so pissed off at in others.

  32. I only take issue by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with the AT&T reps manner of presenting this, trying to make it sound as if the problems is the caller/potential customer's fault.

    Its not that "you (the caller, or New York residents) doesn't have enough towers", its that "We (AT&T) don't have enough towers (in New York)"

    My suggestion to the caller, would be to make their next question something along the lines of "So when will AT&T be putting up more towers then?" I mean heck, its not like they even have to build actual *towers* - there are skyscrapers all over the place to stick cells on top of or out the windows at lower floors.

  33. I live in NYC with my iPhone 3G. No complaints. by Zoson · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had my iPhone 3G since release day. I've generally been very happy with the service that I get from AT&T.

    The first few months, I kept 3G service off and kept to the edge network because there were major issues with the 3G service bouncing on and off. The constant switching from 3G to Edge would severely drain the phone's battery. After that first period of time, there was a marked improvement in signal strength throughout the city. Within Manhattan, I have no problems with 3G service for making phone calls. I can't even remember the last time I lost a call.

    Unfortunately, for me the iPhone is a lot less about having a phone, and more about having a little internet device that's always connected. Having full signal strength does not equate to being able to use 3G data, or fast 3G data speeds. There are many times that I've got full signal strength, but can not use the internet because of the poor signal to noise ratio. Poor SnR is something that anyone, on any carrier will experience within a heavily populated, dense, and electrified city.

    Do some Google searches on every carrier in every major city and you will find that there are a LOT of unhappy people regardless of the service they have.