Slashdot Mirror


Extinct Ibex Resurrected By Cloning

The Telegraph is reporting that for the first time an extinct animal has been brought back via cloning. The Pyrenean ibex, a type of mountain goat, was declared officially extinct in 2000, but thanks to preserved skin samples scientists were able to insert that DNA into eggs from domestic goats to clone a female Pyrenean ibex. While the goat didn't survive long due to lung defects this gives scientists hopes that it will be possible to resurrect extinct species from frozen tissue. "Using techniques similar to those used to clone Dolly the sheep, known as nuclear transfer, the researchers were able to transplant DNA from the tissue into eggs taken from domestic goats to create 439 embryos, of which 57 were implanted into surrogate females. Just seven of the embryos resulted in pregnancies and only one of the goats finally gave birth to a female bucardo, which died seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties, perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone."

42 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. No Problem... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    We can just patch the damaged or missing segments with frog DNA...

    1. Re:No Problem... by bearflash · · Score: 5, Funny

      And since they're all females, there's no way they can reproduce! I'm 100% certain that the Ibex will never escape this remote Costa Rican island

    2. Re:No Problem... by ushering05401 · · Score: 2, Funny

      WTF, totally OT, but I just booted my computer and instead of the standard GNOME desktop there was some 80's style VR simulation with blocky structures representing the files on my computer. It's a good thing I know Unix, I was able to fly to the proper building to get my system back on line. Close call, though.

    3. Re:No Problem... by LOLLinux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, fsn was one of the cooler things that SGI created for IRIX.

    4. Re:No Problem... by p4ul13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well maybe not. As long as we're pouring on the Jurassic Park references, there was another line "your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."

      The animal has been extinct for a short time, but none-the-less the norm in northern Spain for the last 9 years has been to not have ibex. Reintroducing cloned ibex to the area might cause other issues that hadn't been considered.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    5. Re:No Problem... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember Pyrenean Ibex run at 10 m/s and they do not know fear.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:No Problem... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our mutant zombie clone goat overlords.

    7. Re:No Problem... by adolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the confusion lies in the bizarre implication that we humans are somehow unnatural, as if no other species has ever hunted another to extinction.

  2. Don't worry! by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nature will find a way.

    Did we learn nothing from Jurassic Park?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Don't worry! by Aeros · · Score: 2, Funny

      the folk song

    2. Re:Don't worry! by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nature will find a way, apparently, to do everything except avert the extinction in the first place...

      I think that should tell us something.

  3. Not exactly. by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

    The mitochondrial DNA will not be from the IBX so what you have is still an hybrid.
    Maybe better than nothing but not really bringing the species back.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Not exactly. by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But if they have skin samples, then they do have the mitochondrial DNA. We just don't have the ability to replace that part of the cell structure. Yet. Another problem is that the specimen is female, meaning there is no Y chromosome, so we could never create a male.

      At this point we should probably be harvesting DNA from threatened species (from enough donors to form a not-completely-terrible breeding population) and storing it away somewhere.

    2. Re:Not exactly. by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first generation IS a hybrid, but then you implant that with extracted DNA, and so forth so that after several generations you get something that is pretty much equivalent to the extinct species.

      How will that recover the mitochondrial DNA? What they need to do is to replace that as well, not just continue implanting the chromosomal DNA. Eventually we may learn how to do that, but we can't do it yet.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Not exactly. by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA

      Mitochondrial DNA is separate from the DNA of the host organism. It is inherited through the colony of mitochondria living in the egg the mother forms. No Ibex mother, no Ibex mitochondria. The mitochondria reproduce without interference from the hosts nuclear DNA. I don't know that this qualifies the animal as a hybrid, but as an environment its cellular flora have been replaced.

      --
      They're there affecting their effect.
    4. Re:Not exactly. by Aeros · · Score: 2, Funny

      better trademark the name 'Mammoth Burgers' and 'Mammoth Steaks' now then so your grandkids or great-grandkids will be wealthy!

    5. Re:Not exactly. by BluBrick · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm still waiting for them to do this with the wooly mammoth; logic dictates that if my ancestors hunted this species to extinction, they must have been REALLY tasty!

      Logic dictates nothing of the sort. It could be that mammoth meat tasted terrible, but a mammoth tusk was the standard price for a blowjob.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    6. Re:Not exactly. by dkh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are many species without a Y chromosome. Guppies (the aquarium fish) for example. The diff between female and male guppies is X X vs. X null.

      Humans are headed in this direction, slowly, because the human Y chromosome is non-recombinant and does not repair itself when errors or mutations occur. Whether that means males are defective or just more efficient is still up for debate.

      --
      My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    7. Re:Not exactly. by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ability to transfer mitochondria is definitely possible, and has been for over a decade- see here for instance, where it was performed between two species of mice. I doubt they bothered with the process though, for several reasons. Mitochondrial transfer has an admittedly low success rate, and of course nuclear transfer has a low success rate, so that to produce a viable clone with both procedures would be extremely difficult. The mtDNA also has a higher mutation rate than nuclear DNA due to the reactive oxygen species the mitochondrion cranks out. It might be that there isn't much meaningful interspecies variation between the mtDNA of extinct ibex and the living egg donor, especially in relation to intraspecies variation.

      Also, the mitochondrial DNA in most mammals is about 17,000 base pairs. The average mammalian nuclear genome is a few billion base pairs. The nuclear DNA represents over 99.99% of the total DNA, and given that I'd assume domestic goat mtDNA to have at the very least a 98% concurrence with Pyrenean ibex mtDNA, you'd be looking at a variability consistent with the overall error rate of DNA. The preservation, cloning, and IVF steps likely swamp interspecies mtDNA variation as an overall source of genetic error.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  4. It's ALIVE!!!!! by Yo+Grark · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't goat you, I herd it's dead Jim.

    Ewe!

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  5. Corrected title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pyrenean Ibex extinct... again.

  6. A new first by Haxzaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, this Ibex became the first species to become extinct twice?

    1. Re:A new first by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the first clone to be the only one of its kind. ’Tis a grand day for clones!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  7. Re:Call Dr Neil by burner · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm thinking Jurassic Pork. Bring back some extinct hog species and grill 'em up!

    --
    MRSH-Recording device, corned beef sandwich with kraut, seafaring bird, and the foamy top of a beverage.
  8. Evil clone by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Recognized by the goatee

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    1. Re:Evil clone by ianare · · Score: 4, Funny

      The normal method fails here, after all they're _goats_

  9. Taking Orders? by DorkRawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    1 dinosaur, please!

  10. Re:Finally! by RileyBryan · · Score: 2, Funny

    But they are off the menu...

  11. Re:Old story is old. by Conchobair · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll bet the good people at The Telegraph are wondering how a story published on 31 Jan 2009 made it back into the most viewed list.

  12. yesh... by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    no, no, no, no, no!

    try this :
    "This just in, Pyrenean Ibex still extinct." </Chevy Chase>

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  13. Nothing new here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As mentioned before, this is not an exact clone. The only thing this story proves is that they can create a hybrid animal (nothing new there) and that the researches who did this were dishonest about the product (nothing new there) and that the news media is full of a bunch of dolts with little desire or propensity for actual journalism (nothing new there either). The only thing that was created was 7 minutes of suffering.

  14. Re:So when... by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mammoth fail. Tusk. Tusk. Tusk.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  15. Re:Finally! by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but that's because they taste too much like spotted owl.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  16. Re:Finally! by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about the Spam, Spam, Spam, Bald Eagle and Spam?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  17. iBex... iDoDo... iSlate! by VoxMagis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't you see? It's a marketing ploy by Apple!

    --
    -- I really need to bleed off some of this /. karma.
  18. Not necessarily by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...which died a seven minutes later due to breathing difficulties, perhaps due to flaws in the DNA used to create the clone.

    I have a goat herd and trust me when I say there doesn't have to be any flaws in the DNA to lose a baby. I've seen them still born, born too frail to stand up and get colostrum from mom, seen them live for a couple days and then die for no apparent reason. There's a reason goats have babies two and sometimes three at a time. The loss rate can be high, even under ideal conditions. The breed difference could account for it. Maybe the original breed had a slightly longer gestation period than modern goats.

    Back in the day I used to help a vet implant zebra embryos in horses. The take rate was a bit higher than that experiment, but we had more embryos to work with. 10% was a pretty good rate for implants and there's a lot of data on horses.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  19. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dinosaurs still exist. We call them "birds".

    In particular, they're the decendents of the clade Maniraptora, which includes velociraptor. Many are still remarkably similar to their ancestors -- for example, compare these reconstructed skull images of oviraptors with modern birds (for example, the cassowary)

    --
    As it says in the Constitution, Lenin is in my shower.
  20. Re:Old story is old. by indeciso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aye, actually when I read the heading I felt some kind of a déjà vu... no wonder.

  21. Re:Genetically identical... by reverseengineer · · Score: 2, Informative

    It turns out that many clones are genetically identical, but not epigenetically identical. DNA methylation errors are common in nuclear transfer clones, and are thought to be responsible for at least some of the defects that often occur in clones. In particular, some imprinted genes important for normal growth and development may end up with two silenced copies instead of the expected one silent and one active, leading to effects from congenital organ defects to an increased risk of cancer. Curiously, some of the important developmental genes that can experience this situation in most mammals are not imprinted in primates. At least from a technical perspective, it might be easier to clone humans than goats.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  22. Incompatible Gestation Periods by red_flea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Goat gestation period are around 150 days.
    Ibex is around 165 days.

    Even if you take a healthy Ibex mother and remove the fetus after 150 days, it will have similar lung disability. Lungs being the last thing to develop in a fetus, if you chop off the last few days of fetal development, you're sacrificing lung function. They won't work at 100%, and they'll be way more sensitive to any agitation. It seems to me like a better approach would be to find an animal with a equal OR LONGER gestational period. I don't mean for Ibexes in particular; it just makes sense for any mammal. Try a mountain goat: 180 day average gestation period. Just make sure you bust the little guy out two weeks early.

    If humans go extinct and you implant human DNA into a bonobo, you're putting something that takes 280 days to cook into an oven with a 230 day timer. No, it won't be fully cooked when the thing dings - the lungs especially. Premature human babies do survive that young, but we've had a long time and lots of money poured into finding ways to make that happen.

  23. Re:Jurassic Park here we come! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2, Informative

    The common ancestor we share with the dinosaurs was not itself a dinosaur, but the birds started out as a branch of the dinosaurs. If you consider the word "dinosaur" to be a clade, then they are dinosaurs.

  24. Are you sure it's not a penguin? by LordHatrus · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is one Intrepid Ibex for sure. Maybe they spliced in some penguin DNA? *wink*