Slashdot Mirror


Apple Fails To Deliver On Windows 7 Boot Camp Promise

SkydiverFL writes "For those fans of Apple's Boot Camp package, it looks like you might be waiting on the next 'end of year' to use Windows 7 on your shiny silver boxes. Back in October of this year, Apple published a rather short, but affirmative promise stating quite simply that, 'Apple will support Microsoft Windows 7 (Home Premium, Professional, and Ultimate) with Boot Camp in Mac OS X Snow Leopard before the end of the year. This support will require a software update to Boot Camp.' The support page has no updates regarding the new version. Maybe they're waiting for iSlate?"

60 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. The Vista drivers work fine by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no need to wait. I installed Windows 7 bootcamp on the day it was released on Technet, and it worked fine with the Vista drivers.

    1. Re:The Vista drivers work fine by Z_A_Commando · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a friend with a 2008 MacBook Pro that absolutely could not, for whatever reason, get Windows 7 to run correctly on Bootcamp. He would start it up and be able to get to the login screen, but his MBP would report the keyboard and touchpad as something non-generic and require a driver that doesn't yet exist for Window 7. He could force-install a generic driver but the exact same thing would happen the next time Windows restarted because it detects a less than ideal driver and replaces it.

      Last I checked he was running 7 inside VMware instead, but he'd rather run it without a host OS under Bootcamp. As has been said lower here, it's not about the ability to run Windows 7 on Bootcamp, it's Apple's support of it. What's disappointing is they've had a lot longer than the GA of Windows 7 to put together this "update" and still haven't done it.

    2. Re:The Vista drivers work fine by PatJensen · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is not true. I also installed Windows 7 off of TechNet at launch, but a lot of stuff is broken. You will not get external audio jack support with Windows 7 OEM drivers on iMac 2009 machines. You will also not get internal microphone or mixer support with Windows 7 OEM drivers on iMac 2009 machines. If you intend on using any Voice over IP applications, Cisco IP Communicator, Ventrilo, Microsoft OCS - install Vista. And, updated sound drivers will not fix your problem. The Intel chipset drivers that ship native to boot camp are what are needed to map the mixer. Windows 7 driver support on iMac's are a sorry state of affairs.

    3. Re:The Vista drivers work fine by Fussen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have had similar issues with the keyboard drivers myself. I have a 2007 Macbook Pro and when I tried to install the 64-bit version of Windows, I couldn't initialize the install because after EFI boot, I couldn't hit "Any key" to start the installer..

      The 32-bit version of Windows 7 was a success.. for some reason, that installer allowed me to press any key and begin the process. I am writing from Windows 7 on my mac right now, and I used the snow leopard disc to install my drivers. All went fine as such.. but the ATI x1600 video card driver sucks.. and the Omega ATI drivers are not ready for Vista/7 yet, so I have done some driver updates myself after the snow leopard package.

    4. Re:The Vista drivers work fine by dissy · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are correct in that the OEM drivers built into Windows 7 do not support Apple hardware.

      Just install the drivers off the OS X DVD into Windows 7 and all that hardware will work.

      If your complaint is the drivers are not built into Win7, then you are complaining at the wrong company. Apple does not make Windows 7...

    5. Re:The Vista drivers work fine by thejynxed · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's "usually" the OS turning off power to the device to save electricity.

      You can disable that via the Conrol Panel applet called System, then go to Device Manager (probably a link in the left panel), select Mice and other pointing devices, click on the mouse listed, then on the Power Management tab. Should be a checkbox there you can clear out.

      UAC will probably rear it's ugly head when you first invoke the System applet, and possibly when you make a change and hit Apply/OK.

      We won't even get into the issues you might get if your mouse was assigned the same IRQ and DMA range as your SATA controller (It isn't pretty).

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  2. Why bother? by moderators_are_w*nke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you wanted a Windows laptop why would you pay all that money?

    --
    "XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, use more." - Anonymous Coward
    1. Re:Why bother? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because some people have applications that need Windows to run for work, school, home, etc. that don't run nicely in VirtualBox.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Why bother? by furball · · Score: 4, Informative

      PC World's fastest Windows laptop in 2007 was a MacBook Pro

    3. Re:Why bother? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except they like to use OS X. Just like how I have Ubuntu installed for when I'm at home or just browsing, and Windows installed for work. Myself, I can't stand using Windows any more than I need to, but the program I could never get to run correctly on WINE and it runs too slowly on VirtualBox to be useful.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:Why bother? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      VirtualBox is slow at doing 3D acceleration. Therefore, AutoCAD runs pretty slow when working with lots of 3D objects.

      Not only that, but games run slow too.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:Why bother? by Ragzouken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess it's in their interests not to get the fastest laptop, then.

    6. Re:Why bother? by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WTF? It's like saying somebody should buy an F1 car just because it's fastest, while they actually need something which does not cost them their house and children, not require special fuel and can run on ordinary road. Way to go on a tangent!

    7. Re:Why bother? by jim_v2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, that's what you would buy a Vaio for. My screen developed some (50+ in a cluster) dead pixels three months after I bought my laptop, and Sony had someone meet me at work and replace it three days later.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    8. Re:Why bother? by TrancePhreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is 2010, and the MacBook Pro is very behind. Where's the Core i7? Something newer than the NV9600? Where's the lower price?

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    9. Re:Why bother? by mingrassia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WTF? It's like saying somebody should buy an F1 car just because it's fastest

      I agree 100%. People should buy a machine to suit their needs. Anyone who blindly buys the fastest model available is just being egotistical and foolish.

      which does not cost them their house and children

      A new Mac mini goes for $599 and a MacBook is $999. This is hardly "house and children" figures. Pick a reasonable Mac then go to Dell and spec out a similar machine. The PC prices will be in a close neighborhood.

      not require special fuel and can run on ordinary road

      This article is not about the iPhone. It is about Apple systems running OS X that can utilize Boot Camp.

      Hardly any "special fuel" required on OS X systems. Take your pick from any of the great open source apps available for the platform: Firefox, Thunderbird, Inkscape, Gimp, VLC, Eclipse, the list goes on. Wanna write some code? Xcode comes free with OS X. Don't wanna use Xcode, then use another IDE or directly use make, gcc, gdb, and vim.

      As for your "ordinary road" comment ... I'm writing this on a four year old iMac. Over the years I've upgraded the memory (Crucial has great prices) and hard drive (1TB was only $99 at Fry's). My mouse of choice is a five button Logitech scroll mouse. I hardly feel "locked in" or "abused".

      Way to go on a tangent!

      Way to spread FUD. How about we just let people use the computer that best suits their needs.

      Getting back on topic, I've been running Windows 7 in both Boot Camp and Parallels 5 with no problems. I don't know what the damage is with this "article".

      --
      OS X, Linux, Tivo, Amiga, my fascination with cult-like technologies would intrigue any psychiatrist.
    10. Re:Why bother? by iron-kurton · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like my parents' daily trip to school

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    11. Re:Why bother? by HybridJeff · · Score: 2, Informative

      "A new Mac mini goes for $599 and a MacBook is $999. This is hardly "house and children" figures. Pick a reasonable Mac then go to Dell and spec out a similar machine. The PC prices will be in a close neighborhood."

      Ok I'll take that challenge. Im Canadian so priced in CAD.

      $649 Mac Mini: http://store.apple.com/ca/configure/MC238LL/A?mco=MTM3NTAwOTE
      2.26GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
      2GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x1GB
      160GB Serial ATA Drive

      $409 Dell Inspiron http://configure.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=di545s_r_1e&c=ca&l=en&s=dhs&cs=cadhs1&kc=desktop-inspiron-545s
      2.4Ghz Intel E2220
      2GB Ram
      320GB HD

      The dell also gets you a mouse and keyboard for $140 less. Upgrade any of the parts and you save more versus the apple.

    12. Re:Why bother? by HybridJeff · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did some ore playing to match the specs better.

      $1,132.00 Mac Mini: http://store.apple.com/ca/configure/MC238LL/A?mco=MTM3NTAwOTE
      2.53GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
      4GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x2GB
      320GB Serial ATA Drive
      SuperDrive 8x (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
      Apple Mouse
      Apple Keyboard with Numeric Keypad

      $559 Dell Inspiron: http://configure.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=di545s_r_1e&c=ca&l=en&s=dhs&cs=cadhs1&kc=desktop-inspiron-545s
      Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo E7300 (3MB L2, 2.66GHz, 1066FSB)
      4GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz- 2 DIMMs
      320GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM) w/DataBurst Cache(TM)
      Dell Mouse / Keyboard

    13. Re:Why bother? by RedK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're comparing a tower PC to a small form factor PC. The only Dell comparable to a Mac Mini is a Studio Hybrid (the Zino and Zino HD use low power processors that aren't up to par with the Core 2 Duo in the Mini). The small form factor PCs are always a bit more expensive due to requiring laptop parts instead of desktop parts. Price out a Studio Hybrid vs a Mac Mini and compare more than just 3 specs (RAM, HD, CPU) and you'll see Apple isn't priced out of the market like you claim. But of course, that would require a good faith effort on your part.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  3. Umm... by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Um, I was under the impression that it was trivial to install Windows 7 on a Mac even without official boot camp support (per http://www.simplehelp.net/2009/01/15/using-boot-camp-to-install-windows-7-on-your-mac-the-complete-walkthrough/) whats the difference between the tutorial and what you would do normally?

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  4. -Windows by pubwvj · · Score: 2, Funny

    New self-cleaning nano-tech glass allows one to avoid doing windows.

  5. i just posted this comment on my 27" imac by rizawbone · · Score: 4, Informative

    running windows 7. what's the issue? everything works great.

  6. Works fine on a Mac Pro by DigitalGodBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had the RTM installed on a first-gen Mac Pro and everything worked out of the box. Sure the Apple drivers put a startup disk selector in, and fix the clock sync issue but driver-wise what's the point?

    --
    "liberty and justice for all those who can afford it"
  7. Apple haters... by TimHunter · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...line up here on the left. No need to crowd, there'll be plenty of room for everybody. This is Slashdot, so remember the rules. Only fags and hipsters use Macs. "Fanboys" is spelled "fanbois." Macs are expensive, shiny and there aren't any games worth playing.

    Use the Preview button!

    1. Re:Apple haters... by drmitch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno. I switched to Mac in September after making fun of them for my entire life. Although I paid more than I would for a PC (just saying I would have purchased a 500 dollar PC laptop that didn't have the same specs as a MBP) I am quite happy with the little things that Apple does in the hardware and software. I do miss a few Windows programs (especially being an engineer and coder and needing the special software/hardware) but 98% of the time, I am perfectly happy with the visuals, lack of viruses, *NIX capability, and user-friendliness of my MBP.

  8. Why do you eschew choice? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you buy a Mac Laptop, you can run Windows, Linux or OS X, all fully supported.

    If you buy a Windows laptop, you can't officially run OS X - and of course it comes pre-loaded with Windows, not OS X.

    Considering you also get better quality hardware, it seems reasonable to pay a little more for more choice.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why do you eschew choice? by Totenglocke · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agree. I'm thinking of getting a Macbook Pro, and it's tempting just to run it Windows 7 only. OS X really doesn't have any advantages over Win 7 that I can think of - especially since my friends who own Mac's are always trying to find scripts and programs to download to get OS X to have features that Windows has had for forever (hibernate, keyboard shortcut to lock the screen, things like that).

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Why do you eschew choice? by zblack_eagle · · Score: 3, Informative

      While I consider my aluminium macbook to be of excellent design and hardware quality, the first generation macbook that I had before this was absolutely atrocious. Random reboots, dying batteries, malfunctioning chargers, wireless that wouldn't connect under bootcamp and an optical drive that required prying a second disc half way in to be able to eject the first disc.

      On the topic of the article, Vista drivers work fine, but one thing I did not appreciate was having to (though easily) find a work around to Apple's arbitrary restriction on limiting the installation of x64 drivers to the macbook pros. Not sure what the stupid rationale would've been for that as the drivers work fine and nobody would've chosen to buy a macbook pro just to run Windows x64

    3. Re:Why do you eschew choice? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speaking as a former repair tech that still gets the 'honor' of fixing other people's broken new-model macbooks, I'll just say "Look at the actual board vendors." Apple hasn't realy "MADE" their own hardware in years. They just say what hardware they want and let the board makers pack it on and make it work.

      Fuck that noise, you're better off trying to piece your own system together. In fact, many companies exist to do just that for you, nowdays, with discrete powerful MXM graphics that you can upgrade. Barebones laptops FTW. And you'll still get a comparable system for about 1/3 as much.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Why do you eschew choice? by Totenglocke · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're also ignoring the fact that you have to re-open any files, programs, and possibly websites that were open. Not only does that take time, but it's also a pain to keep track of everything. Hibernate is wonderful, but you'll never even give it credibility because it's the evil Windows that uses it (yes, I realize Linux has it too, but I've yet to see a Linux system wake from sleep or hibernate - I love Linux, but that's always been a problem on every Linux system I've used).

      Besides - 2 minutes? My POS laptop can wake from hibernate to everything working perfectly in Win 7 in under a minute. My desktop is even faster.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:Why do you eschew choice? by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And that is what sleep mode is for....

      Sure, hibernate would be nice, just never needed it.

      Instant wake from sleep is more than enough.

    6. Re:Why do you eschew choice? by mfnickster · · Score: 4, Informative

      If enough people request it, I'm sure Apple will include it.

      They already did-- but they call it "safe sleep," and it's not easily accessible from the System Preferences.

      http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/pmset.1.html
      http://www.jinx.de/SmartSleep.html

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    7. Re:Why do you eschew choice? by StuartHankins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Looking for" a hibernate feature? What? I'm using 10.4 and the hibernate works fine. The reboot is somewhere around 90 seconds. Big deal.

  9. Re:jesus christ by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's still not out by when they promised. That's all there is to it. Sure, give the employees time off. They still didn't do the job.

  10. Bootcamp a gimmick by fermion · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I always saw bootcamp as a gimmick to encourage MS Windows users to switch to Apple Hardware. If one buys a mac, and really can't stand OS X, one can always go back to MS Windows. Or if MS Windows must be run occasionally, then Bootcamp is an effective way to do so.

    While it is valid to complain that Apple missed a deadline, I am kind of surprised that Apple even made the effort to create a deadline. I cannot imagine people paying Apple prices to run MS Windows on an exclusive basis. I can imagine them paying such prices to run virtual machines with other OS.

    I would rather see Apple point customers toward Parallels or Fusion rather than working on trying to get MS Windows to work as the base OS. What would be even more cool is a kernal that could then be used to run any number of OS in virtual mode.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Bootcamp a gimmick by stokessd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I always saw bootcamp as a gimmick to encourage MS Windows users to switch to Apple Hardware. If one buys a mac, and really can't stand OS X, one can always go back to MS Windows. Or if MS Windows must be run occasionally, then Bootcamp is an effective way to do so.

      I use BootCamp for playing games (I still play a lot of UT2004) and for doing CAD (Autodesk Inventor and PCB design). All those really benefit from direct booting into windows. Plus the fascist copy protection in the CAD programs makes it difficult to run in parallels. I do use parallels for light CAD work and such, and I just boot from the BootCamp partition using parallels. IT's the best of both worlds.

      I need windows around to do things like PCB design, because there are no viable Mac alternatives. There is a lot of scientific packages are just plain don't exist on the Mac. With the Mac I have OS X for my daily stuff and much of my engineering design work, and occasionally use Windows for the few things I can't do on the mac. All on one quiet machine.

      Windows 7 works fine on my mid 2009 17" MBP using the vista drivers. I run XP though, as I don't need or want the extra features of "7" and the smaller footprint of XP makes it nicer for my needs.

      Sheldon

    2. Re:Bootcamp a gimmick by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Funny

      Games games game games games. Games, games game games. Games = games. Game games; games, games games games, games and games. Games? Games!

      Games.

  11. Lost a little of my soul, but no other issues by RunzWithScissors · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oddly, Windows 7 works just fine on my MacBook Pro 15".

    There was a Firmware update about 2 weeks ago, which may have been what we were waiting for; but I had no problems with it when I installed it today.

    -Runz

    1. Re:Lost a little of my soul, but no other issues by ekgringo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have been successfully running 64-bit Windows 7 on my late 2008 15" MacBook Pro since RC2 came out, using Vista drivers. I don't think I can switch between the two video cards and I wish I could adjust the sensitivity of the multi-touch trackpad, but everything works fine for the most part. Hell, it runs games almost as well as my home-built gaming PC.

  12. Apple Specific Drivers by WarpedCore · · Score: 3, Informative

    From what I heard, OS X uses certain low level functions that control processor speed/voltage within the OS itself versus what conventionally would be done through a BIOS on a normal PC. Apple uses EFI... I know that. Just reading about some of the "dangers" if using a Mac to run Linux... main reason being, you have a likeliness of damaging the CPU if all you run are intensive tasks under Linux. Apple wrote drivers that deal with this stuff under Windows. All in all, Vista drivers will work fine... but I'm just picky about "official bootcamp support" even if it is a gimmick. Apple wouldn't be putting an ounce of elbow grease into it unless there was something important they were writing into it to ensure a smooth experience.

    1. Re:Apple Specific Drivers by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Informative

      Windows 7 supports EFI natively. You apparently do need Apple drivers to use the internal keyboard and trackpad on laptops, though.

      Regarding power management, AFAIK, the worst case scenario would be if the SMC drivers didn't load, in which case after the SMC's watchdog timer fires, the SMC should bring all the fans up to full blast. You're not going to overheat the CPU by failing to load the drivers. You can verify this if you'd like. With your computer idle, unload the fan control KEXT. Thirty seconds or a minute later, the fans should ramp up. When you reload the KEXT, they should spin immediately back down to what you'd expect with the machine idle. At least this is what happens in the G5 towers. I'm assuming the Intel laptops behave the same way.

      CPU power management is handled by the CPU, not by any special bits in the chipset, AFAIK, so that should be unaffected no matter what. And the hardware is designed to protect against getting too hot, so at some point, the CPU starts putting itself to sleep to keep the temperature within bounds, and if even that isn't enough, the computer shuts down. AFAIK, most of that happens in hardware, so even a really broken OS shouldn't be able to damage hardware. At the very least, it's pretty unlikely.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Apple Specific Drivers by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I use Ubuntu on a Macbook. The power management (battery life, suspend, hibernate) is much better on Mac OS, and there are a few drivers that need to be installed, but otherwise it works just fine.

  13. Re:Virtualbox by BrentH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Graphic cards arent virtualized. So if you want games, you gotta go to the Bootcamp!

  14. Stop with the "Better quality hardware" by IANAAC · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's readily available in non-Apple form.

    1. Re:Stop with the "Better quality hardware" by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not even close, at least not for the Mac Pro (which I considered for a while until the price realization came).

      The 8-core Mac Pro base sells for $3299. I tried to duplicate the hardware, but unfortunately you can't buy some of it at most stores any more as it's older (i.e., nobody sells it anymore because it's junk compared to current hardware).

      • $420 motherboard that is considerably better than that on the Mac Pro, as it includes SAS 2.0 RAID and IPMI (similar to HP's ILO). There are many other similar motherboards in the same price range with slightly different feature sets (SLI support, etc.), so you can pick and choose to get exactly what you might need.
      • $770 for 2x Xeon 5520, the same CPU as on the base Mac Pro
      • $417 for 12 GB DDR3 RAM, twice that of the base Mac Pro
      • $75 Caviar Black 640GB hard drive, which is likely better than what is in the Mac Pro
      • $30 24x DVD writer, faster and more fully featured than the Apple "SuperDrive"
      • $70 GT 220 video card, which is better than the GT 120 included with the Mac Pro (the GT 120 is basically not available for sale any more because it's about 3 generations behind current tech)
      • $300 for case and power supply (a generous allowance, for sure)

      So, for less than $2100, you can far exceed the specs on the $3300 Mac Pro, and these are nowhere near the lowest prices on this hardware...it's just that Newegg carries everything and their search is very good.

    2. Re:Stop with the "Better quality hardware" by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > The 8-core Mac Pro base sells for $3299 [apple.com]. I tried to duplicate the hardware

      Fortunately with a PC I don't get stuck with what Steve thinks I should have. I get to
      build systems based on what MY actual requirements are. Yes, that's ME as an INDIVIDUAL
      rather than just another member of the hive.

      I can skimp on the CPU or supercharge it or leave things out entirely or include things
      that exist in no Mac.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Stop with the "Better quality hardware" by StuartHankins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The list of complete models must be limited, or you get the chaos of half-assed support and conflicting drivers which exists in the Windows world. Apple has a reputation for ease of use, and part of the reason for that is having very specific models with very specific parts designed to work together. Once you open the gates to allow anyone to put just anything they want in the machine, you have support issues. It's a closed product with limited options.

      If Apple products don't suit you, don't use them. Simple as that. But you come across as a maligned Apple-hater when you could just say "Meh, not for me" instead. I would expect better from someone with a low ID.

    4. Re:Stop with the "Better quality hardware" by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 3, Informative

      The list of complete models must be limited, or you get the chaos of half-assed support and conflicting drivers which exists in the Windows world. Apple has a reputation for ease of use, and part of the reason for that is having very specific models with very specific parts designed to work together. Once you open the gates to allow anyone to put just anything they want in the machine, you have support issues. It's a closed product with limited options. If Apple products don't suit you, don't use them. Simple as that. But you come across as a maligned Apple-hater when you could just say "Meh, not for me" instead. I would expect better from someone with a low ID.

      the grand parent post purpose is to specifically shows that "better quality" as in "apple form" does not have to be as expensive as apple hardware. To that extent, the post is extremely spot-on

  15. Re:Virtualbox by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not entirely correct.

    Virtualizing the graphics card already has support for all the major VMs (VirtualBox, VMWare, Parallels, etc) and it's being actively worked on with support from the big GPU ISVs.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  16. Re:Virtualbox by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't see any Linux vendors bragging about what a big extra "feature" GRUB is, and it does the same thing. Often more transparently.

    Really? I admit I haven't used GRUB for a couple of years and it may have improved since I last did, but I don't remember it letting me pop in a Windows CD, helping me resize my existing partitions, then installing Windows and setting up the correct third-party drivers for my hardware. Does it really do all of that now?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  17. uhhh... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they're waiting for iSlate?

    iGuess...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  18. Its Very Doable now by anethema · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is some info not provided in the rest of the 'I'm posting from Win7" posts here is some helpful information.

    First, the Snow Leopard DVD includes boot camp 3.0, which VASTLY improves the use of the touchpad under Windows XP or Vista. It also mostly works under Windows 7.

    If you don't have a Snow Leopard DVD, here is a link to the drivers on TPB:

    http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5054638/Bootcamp_Driver_3.0_for_Windows_32bit__amp__64bit_%28from_Snow_Leopard

    After installing this updating the sound drivers and video drivers would be advisable since the ones that come in boot camp suck and/or cause crashes.

    http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us for video drivers. Select windows-7 then 32 or 64 bit depending on which you've chosen.
    ac
    http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=14&PFid=24&Level=4&Conn=3&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false

    After this it should be reasonably stable.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  19. Re:A want is not a need, and slow is not "not nice by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By your logic I don't need a decent CPU or RAM because Windows XP will run on 64 MB of memory and a 233 MHZ x86 CPU.

    Things that run decently and don't have minute-long lag is a need.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  20. Wait, by Movi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, the version i am running from Snow Leopard, that says "compatible with Windows 7" right there on the setup screen is actually NOT compatible with windows 7.

    FTFA:

    You cannot run your Mac applications simultaneously

    No one notified me of this! Ive been running it like that since I installed it!

    You cannot safely resize the Mac or Windows partitions

    Got me again! Next time i'll try it, i'll make sure to do it as unsafely as i can.

    You cannot easily transfer files between the two partitions (without third-party support)

    I'll stop using the hfs driver in boot camp right away (once i learn to disable it. Damn apple making stuff just work).

    Seriously, anyone reading CNet for legitimate stories should have his head checked.

  21. Re:A want is not a need, and slow is not "not nice by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

    You must be a hit at parties.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  22. Re:Virtualbox by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Really? I admit I haven't used GRUB for a couple of years and it may have improved since I
    > last did, but I don't remember it letting me pop in a Windows CD, helping me resize my
    > existing partitions, then installing Windows and setting up the correct third-party drivers
    > for my hardware. Does it really do all of that now?

    That's really the OS installer's job which Linux does very well at.

    Both Windows and MacOS are inferior in this respect. Given the UI of the install CDs,
    I would not hold out great hopes for Boot Camp being terribly usable (despite what
    ever features might be buried inside).

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  23. Boot camp can't be trusted by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have noticed 2 major issues with Boot Camp coming with the "snow leopard" DVD and I started to believe Apple doesn't want users to have good performance on Windows. Or, they don't have slightest clue about importance of these things.

    1) The NVidia GPU drivers coming with Snow Leopard DVD (and there are no updates) are _old_. One would think "well, they could prefer stability", no it is not the case either. The stuff offered at NVidia drivers page are WHQL certified by default too. 9400M is especially a GPU/Integrated GPU hybrid, it really needs up to date, latest driver software to function properly.

    2) Now, this is not a trivial thing to fix like heading to nvidia and download a driver. SATA on latest gen Mac Mini (and Intel based stuff) is not properly identified to Windows via MBR or "BIOS". There isn't much information there but in case of Intel SATA controller, it is documented and you can take a real big risk of MBR tweaking with some ready to use tools and identify SATA/AHCI situation to Windows, thanks to NCQ like features _only_ available to AHCI (at least under win), 2-3x performance hit may occur. NVidia chipset having Mac Minis who really needs whatever software performance they need (they run 2.5"). I did every documented, undocumented, dangerous trick on book to have 20 MB/sec pathetic speed. Same drive on same hardware hits 60-70MB/sec on OS X.

    As Nvidia won't give specs to a chipset nerd or end user, things would really change in case of Apple themselves contacting them. I really believe people who can do crazy things like putting a virtual BIOS on top of EFI etc would manage to change couple of bytes. I started to believe that it is Apple who wants their users,customers to have junk like performance on Windows. Perhaps with the recent Win 7 hype, they are afraid of their customers having good experience with Windows and start to question their brand?

  24. re: There are still bugs .... by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I ran across a nasty bug when I first put Windows 7 on a drive in my Mac Pro.

    My system has 4 physical hard drives in it. The first was labeled "OS X Boot" and the 2nd. and 3rd. had labels of "Data 1" and "Data 2". I installed Windows 7 on the 4th. drive. All went well, except when booted into Windows 7, it displayed the OS X drives out of order. (With the latest version of Boot Camp drivers on the Snow Leopard DVD, they provide "read only" support of the OS X HFS+ volumes in Windows.) It was assigning my "Data 1" drive as drive G" while "Data 2" was drive F:, and "OS X Boot" was given letter H:.

    I figured "No big deal. I know how to fix it when Windows does this stuff ....", and went into Computer Management and Disk Management under Administrative Tools, and told it to reassign the drive letters in the order I wanted them. It did, as requested, and all seemed to be well.

    EXCEPT, on reboot into OS X, I discovered my OS X drives were rendered unbootable/unusable! Windows 7 could see them just fine - but the Mac didn't like them natively anymore! Worse yet, I tried all sorts of disk repair utilities on them and the usual result was being shown that the drives were of an "unrecognized partition type" and options to repair them were "greyed out"! One program, Drive Genius, actually let me verify and repair the volumes - but after running through everything, insisted the drives were "ok" and there was nothing to repair!

    Apparently, the Disk Management in Windows actually rewrites something in the partition table when it reassigns drive letters (not just a registry update), and whatever it does changes things JUST enough to screw up OS X from using the HFS+ volumes normally. Apple really needs to update their drivers so they prevent people from being able to write to the drives from Windows' disk management tool, since this is the case. "Read only HFS+ support" should mean just that!

  25. No, actually, they're not by ifwm · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The PC prices will be in a close neighborhood."

    This hasn't been true for 5 years, and gets less true every day.

    It fun to watch you people get modded up for something that is, essentially, an easily disproven lie.