Slashdot Mirror


DVD-CSS's Encryption Not Enough? Here Comes DECE

An anonymous reader writes "Studios digitally restricting (drm) or locking down content with DVD-CSS not enough for you? Well, get ready, here comes the entertainment cartel's Holy Grail, all-hardware encryption, via 'DECE.' And let's not forget this little issue."

32 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Online music distribution is picking up now that DRM is fading away, and the movie industry wants to up the encryption? Seriously?

    1. Re:Again? by DJRumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I found this part particular amusing:

      "But the effort still has a long way to go before it can claim anything like success. The proof will be whether it revives home entertainment sales by getting consumers excited about the new freedoms of the digital world."

      Really? New Freedoms? What crack are these people smoking? How delusional have they become? People rip these things of the disks because of the stranglehold these studios are attempting to put there. Once ripped, they can play them when and wherever they way. They already overcharge for content. Once it's digital the costs to the manufacturer drop and profit soars yet the consumer doesn't see any of that. We're still paying $10 bucks for a CD (sans the CD) how many years later?

      People see the 'value' of an Audio CD or a movie and they know they are overpriced. The digital forms of that just enforce that opinion.

      The whole economics of today seems like it's paying only for exorbitant CEO profits and studio whoring.

    2. Re:Again? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What worries me is not so much the attempted sale of "DECE enabled" media, people are entitled to their stupid ideas; but what this will mean for hardware.

      If the idea of DECE is to have magic-interoperable DRM, than it is clear that they intend to extend this DRM to as many devices and platforms as possible. From the perspective of a DRM system, this is a terrible idea. All it takes is one manufacturer to fuck up on one device model, and the precious "content" is back in the clear.

      However, from the perspective of a customer who wants to be able to repurpose/modify/extend/otherwise enjoy free use of his devices, this is a potential disaster. In pretty much all cases, DRM consortia work as follows:

      1. Design a DRM scheme, include some "hook IP" that is necessary to implement the scheme; but copyrighted or otherwise legally protected.

      2. Force anybody who wishes to implement the scheme, as a condition of licencing the "hook IP" to agree to certain terms and conditions, including "platform robustness" requirements, in the attempt to prevent the one-weak-implementation-leaks-everything problem.

      That's the issue. If this takes off, virtually every common consumer device that happens to touch media in any significant way(set top boxes, media players, multifunction routers, PMPs, etc, etc, etc.) will be produced subject to "platform robustness" requirements. Goodbye third-party-firmware development.

      Obviously, there will still be some hacking here and there, they can't stop that; but it could easily be the kiss of death for the vibrant, productive, (and legal) hacking and extension communities like OpenWRT and rockbox. You'll still be able to get a cracked firmware(if you have a hardware revision 4353 manufactured on week 567 and know which warez group to ask around in, so the DRM won't actually stop anything); but being easily able to modify your own devices, even for perfectly legal and legitimate ends, could well end up being a casualty.

    3. Re:Again? by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fix your typos!

      Combating privacy is what the US Government does.

      The RIAA and MPAA are trying to combat piracy.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re:Again? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Want to give me added value? REMOVE ALL THE CRAP IN FRONT OF THE MOVIE!. It's the #1 reason I rip every DVD and BluRay I buy. To remove all the useless crap from the DVD and extract just the movie.

      Yes I'm wierd thast I dont instantly watch a DVD that I buy, some sit for a month before I'll watch it, but I dont want to waste my limited time in front of the screen watching a "you evil pirate", buy this , look at this upcoming TV show, etc... crap....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Again? by Moryath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >90% of people using homebrew hacks to bypass console copy protection are in it for the warez games

      Oh really? I'd love to see some backup for that claim. The Wii's shitty, underengineered DVD-rom drive has a pretty high failure rate (seen 4 of 10 blow out so far, counting friends/family who purchased the thing). Nintendo will charge you ~$100 (after shipping) to get it repaired, or you can go buy a new one (and then go through the hassle of trying to transfer your account and downloads).

      Alternatively, a USB hard drive (as low as $25 depending on size) and simple tools can let you rip your discs to a hard drive, preventatively. This then gives you the awesome benefits of:
      #1 - reducing wear and tear on your DVD drive.
      #2 - reducing wear and tear on the discs themselves (especially nasty with the grabby slot-loader mechanism).
      #3 - reducing load times on the games.
      #4 - Being able to switch games without having to either (a) go to the locked cabinet to get the next one and put this one back or (b) figure out where your toddler hid the disc you want.

      I for one can't see a downside to setting this up. $25 of preventative maintenance/upgrading is SO worth it.

  2. Pirating by Randseed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sonuds like a good reason why I would want to pirate things rather than buy them. Already the issues with the stupid software DRM that's prevalent all over the place encourage people to either pirate the software or find a crack so that they don't have to deal with it.

    1. Re:Pirating by loutr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I get a new DVD, it spends about 15mn outside its box (the time it takes to rip it), then goes back in never to see daylight again. I then watch the content on my HTPC running XBMC. Same goes for music.

      The day I can't rip a DVD (or a CD for that matter) is the day I'll stop buying them.

    2. Re:Pirating by Benfea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep. The purpose of DRM is to punish legitimate customers.

    3. Re:Pirating by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not just stupid DRM, but stupid content controls in general. An example. I wanted to watch Inglorious Bastards so I checked the Xbox marketplace. I see it's available, but wait it's only available to buy - in standard definition no less. Why I can't I rent it? There are tons of other movies to rent. It can be rented at the video store or on netflix, but I can't rent it from the Xbox marketplace. I am trying to pay to rent a movie, and the content providers instead of making it easy for me to do so push me to find it on the internet instead.

    4. Re:Pirating by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, if you can feel "fair"... Several boxes with games I bought collect dust on the shelf, while I play torrented versions. Not gonna risk putting these in my drive. It took me weeks to get my DVD-RW working fully again after SecuROM bundled with Oblivion broke the drivers beyond repair and I couldn't even make copies of my private data.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:Pirating by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Rather than looking for new and better ways to make money, they would rather do their damnedest to try to prop up their old ways of doing things, doing vast quantities of damage unto themselves and the consumers- and in the end, capitulating and finding a way to make good money in the new scheme of things.

      They did it with VCRs and audio cassettes.

      They can do it with digital distribution- they've just got to quit trying to control things the way they're used to. It no longer works well and they can't figure out they've got to change, right along with their customer base.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    6. Re:Pirating by Moryath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The amount of software I have a "cracked" version of running on my PC coincides in a scary manner (>85%) with the amount of software I have discs for sitting on my shelf.

      The remainder I have either (a) lost the disc for or (b) had the floppy go bad.

      Why so many of them cracked? In the case of games, so I don't have to get out the disc and use the DVD drive as a fucking 5 1/4" dongle just to play all the content that's been loaded to my hard drive anyways. In the case of the software, so I can disable the neverending stream of "UPDATE ME UPDATE ME UPDATE ME" crap and just use the software for what I need it for.

      And don't tell me it really constantly needs to check for updates. It's phoning home just to fucking phone home.

      They turn around and do this with "digital media" files, I don't bother with them any more. "Rights locker" my ass.

    7. Re:Pirating by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a conceptual XKCD link.
      The concept of the link takes precedence over traditional aesthetic and material concerns.

    8. Re:Pirating by purpledinoz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's glaringly obvious that this concept is already doomed to fail. So, what incentive do consumers have to buy this new hardware? This hardware is not going to be cheap, and no one will be willing to pay huge subsidies to make it attractive to customers. And what real value does this add for the customer, compared to another DRM free device that plays everything, say.... a cheap laptop with HDMI output. Oh, and it plays all movies, except from Disney.

      The movie and TV companies need to take advantage of their huge catalog. If downloads were cheap (say $20 for a certain 20h of content), DRM free, and access to ALL movies and TV shows ever made, I would sign up in a heart-beat. Additional value can be added by a netflix type rating and recommendation system, and channels which are pre-programmed. The key is to add additional value on top of the content itself, which piracy has pretty much pushed down to almost 0.

    9. Re:Pirating by calmofthestorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      StarForce can break some drives /hardware/, parent had SecuROM break /software/ (drivers). I've never heard of this before, but I believe it inserts itself as a CD driver to prevent some things, so a small bug could easily ruin a driver stack and require a reinstall.

      One of the many dangers of trusting legal, properly licensed software. Kind of sad that you can trust scene hackers more than legit content providers; I've found trojans in both but the former is by far cleaner.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    10. Re:Pirating by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      what incentive do consumers have to buy this new hardware?

      "Hancock 2" will only be available in this new platform.

    11. Re:Pirating by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being from Texas apparently trumps being a American.

  3. Plays for Sure! by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    “Consumers shouldn’t have to know what’s inside,” he said. “They should just know it will play.”

    Yeah. Except when it doesn't. No internet connection? No movie for you. Rights locker company hit by power failure? No movies for anyone.
    If I "buy" a movie, I expect it to play whenever and wherever I want to watch it...in an airplane, on a boat or in a cave; and without the requirement for internet connectivity or an external "permission" server. I'm fine with those constraints if I'm renting a movie online, but purchase, at a higher price, should mean reduced restrictions on transport and use, in addition to the rights to play multiple times.

    And let's not even think about the "oops, we have decided to discontinue this DRM scheme in favor of a new, incompatible one" scenario, which obsoletes your player and movie collection.

    1. Re:Plays for Sure! by click2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah. Except when it doesn't. No internet connection? No movie for you. Rights locker company hit by power failure? No movies for anyone.

      You also forgot...

      Rights locker company files for bankruptcy
      Rights locker company decides to stop supporting this specific DRM scheme (like PlaysForSure)
      Rights locker company upgrading the DRM to DECEv2
      Someone hacks the device you're using and they decide to revoke keys in devices without a hardware upgrade
      The movie studio decides that 'buying' a movie means you only get to play it an arbitrary number of times

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    2. Re:Plays for Sure! by X86Daddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Annnnnnd one more: first sale doctrine and right of resale, as it applies to all things I buy, is damaged in cases of any software or game that requires "activation." That is why I purchase absolutely nothing that requires "activation." They don't consider it a real purchase, so I won't consider it either. Many DRM schemes fail in this manner as well.

      Going deeper into the copyright wars... The legal concept of copyright is that the holder gains exclusivity of copying for a limited time. If they attempt to limit copying permanently and forever, technologically, via DRM or other bastardizations of digital information, then they, first and foremost, have made that information something outside of the definition of copyrighted material.

      The advent of widespread digital copying and distributing capabilities among the regular population has set many in the content production industries into a frenzy of attempting to fight the new reality. Nothing has changed about right and wrong. If you tell me a joke today, I am 100% free to tell that joke to someone else; such is the nature of information. Now that it has scaled up, some business models can either change, or some very large businesses can continue to fight a losing battle with their legal teams, lobbyists, senators, etc... at great expense, gaining nothing but extreme distrust and disdain from a growing segment of the population.

  4. DRM hurts legitimate customers only by sanosuke001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DRM only hurts the legitimate customers. The people pirating get around it. The content owners spend millions of dollars (if not more) to create better encryption that is cracked in months and is then obsolete to try and keep pirates from doing their thing (which never works) but the only thing they succeed in doing is pissing off their actual customers.

    I was at home for christmas and wanted to watch a Blu-Ray movie on my laptop and output it to my parent's HDTV. Connected up an HDMI cable and PowerDVD 9 said it could only run on the primary display. I disabled the laptop display and tried again; now it said that the display connected was incompatible or some such nonsense (DRM non-compliant). If I had just pirated my movie, I wouldn't have had a problem.

    --
    -SaNo
    1. Re:DRM hurts legitimate customers only by slifox · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The problem is all your examples are very short-sighted:

      It's easier to not pay taxes (less forms to fill in)

      If you don't pay taxes, that's less money towards schools, infrastructure maintenance, police/firefighter salaries, etc -- all of society loses, including you.
      Furthermore, if you don't pay taxes, you'll probably get audited, fined, and maybe even jailed.

      It's easier to not follow the street lights (you get there faster, if at all)

      If you don't follow streetlights, you risk getting into a car crash, possibly injuring or killing yourself, other drivers, or even innocent bystanders (e.g. children walking to school) -- all of society loses, including you.
      Furthermore, if you run streetlights, you'll probably get pulled over, fined, and maybe even jailed.

      It's easier not to care about others (less worries)

      If you don't care about others, they are less likely to care about you. If you act like an ass to others, they're more likely to act like an ass towards you -- both parties lose (unless you like being treated like crap).
      If everyone in society didn't care about anyone else, then all of society would lose.

      So tell me, who do I hurt if I pay once for a CD or DVD, then rip or pirate it and play the unlocked files on any/every device I own? Who do I hurt when I lend my copy to a friend (who, if he finds he likes it, may even purchase his own copy)?

      The answer is no one -- the artists and businessmen who made and sold the product were fairly compensated, and I get to enjoy their work. What DRM does is help the businessmen charge me once for each device I want to play it on, and that hurts _me_

    2. Re:DRM hurts legitimate customers only by madpansy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      /. is an odd crowd. Many people here seem to ignore reading the post they're responding to.

  5. You swallowed the spin... by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The summary is slightly misleading. Yes, it's DRM but it's an effort by the industry to make it so that content purchased in one way (eg. on your PS3) will work on a multitude of other devices which may or may not be owned by you.

    If I want to take a movie to a friend's house (see first line of TFA) and play it, all I have to do is stick the .mp4 (or whatever) file on a USB stick and plug it in their player. The only thing that would stop me doing this is DRM.

    ...so its a new form of DRM which solves a problem that only exists because of DRM.

    Now, I'm happy to either (a) pay a small fee to a streaming video-on-demand service to view a film once, (b) pay a reasonable subscription for access to a large media library or (c) pay a significantly larger price to download an unprotected copy in a standard format which I can watch time and again and "treat like a DVD".

    This however, seems to combine the worst features of (a),(b) and (c).

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  6. No by spikesahead · · Score: 4, Informative

    I want high quality, unencrypted, unencumbered media.

    You are attempting to compete against piracy, which can already provide me with the above, by offering me an inferior product at the cost of replacing my existing, fully functional hardware.

    I did not purchase music online until Amazon MP3 came to town. Amazon MP3 actually fills my exact requirements, high quality, unencrypted, unencumbered media, and as such I have stopped pirating audio entirely and have instead been purchasing music again. It's worth the money to get a high quality instance of what I actually want, and includes an unexpected high value bonus; the album art in every file!

    Amazon MP3 offers a superior product to that produced by piracy. Do the same for video and I will begin spending money on movies again, until that time I will continue to get what I want from the people willing to offer it; pirates.

  7. The Hangover by 2obvious4u · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So I rented "The Hangover" last night. There is a nice new nasty FBI warning when you load the disk and it won't let you skip the previews or go to the main menu. It was another nail in the coffin for me an purchasing or renting movies. I'm about one more bad experience away from becoming a full blown pirate. What made DVD's great when they first came out was the ability to skip all the crap and to not have to rewind, this forcing you to watch PSA's before the movie is utter crap. (Yes there is a stop smoking PSA you can't skip too...)

  8. Re:more like an end run around Apple by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    my son needed his Dora, Oso and Little Einsteins.

    This is where the problem starts. Why does your son need his Dora, Oso and Little Einsteins?

  9. Re:You're paying for the content , not the format by killmenow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think It's supply and demand. It's price anchoring. People are used to paying $10 so that's what they continue to think it's worth. If the price were set at $2 for a CD sales would initially jump because people would see it as a deal since it's well below the established anchor but eventually they'd adjust to the new anchor and internally value a CD at $2. Then if you tried to charge $10 for a CD you'd have next to zero sales because it's ridiculously higher than what people think a CD is worth. This has nothing to do with supply or demand. It has everything to do with how people's brains work.

    Think about it like this: the $599 for an iPhone or a Droid is arbitrary. It was a price point generated by market research that takes irrational agents into account (because as much as economics majors want to pretend we're all rational, we're most definitely not). Now when you see you can get a Droid or iPhone for $199 it feels like a good deal. But only because the original price was set as an anchor. If the original price had been $199 you wouldn't think it's a steal at $199 but because of the early arbitrary price (early adopters are almost always price insensitive) now $199 feels like a good purchasing decision. This is done ALL THE TIME by manufacturers and retailers. Why do you think there are such things as MSRP?

    It works everywhere. Studies even show adding a few high priced items to a menu increases sales of ALL items on the menu. People perceive a deal based on relative prices arbitrarily, supply and demand be damned.

  10. Re:You're paying for the content , not the format by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thats what capitalism is all about isn't it? Supply and demand?

    Under normal circumstances, yes. "Intellectual property" screws that idea all up though. Supply and demand don't work when supply is infinite. Prices are only set by demand, but that too gets screwed up when people find a way to access the unlimited supply for zero cost.

    Record companies EXPECT people to pay the prices they set. Some will, many (who still want the product - just not as that asking price) won't. You can argue about "THAT'S STEALING!!!" all you want, but the population as a whole just doesn't see it that way. Supply and demand simple doesn't apply to this model.

    Imagine you saw the Playstation 3 when it came out. You want one, but realistically you couldn't pay the $400+ price tag. A genie visits you and tells you that if you press this red button a Playstation 3 will magically appear. It doesn't disappear off some store shelf, it doesn't take one from someone else to make yours, it literally appears for free out of thin air. The only "cost" to anyone is that you will no longer buy it from Sony. Do you honestly think most people would feel it morally wrong to take the Playstation out of thin air? Nope - and no amount of bickering from Sony will change that.

    With digital goods we have that magic red button. People were fooled for a while when they felt like they were buying physical albums and movies on a hard-media, but that trick is going away. They're not getting the genie back into the bottle. Even as an iTunes user I'll admit that my purchases there are about the convenience of having everything easily searchable and of a known quality. Not having to deal with shady torrent sites, spending hours looking for something, and then discovering that it's a bad rip, fake, etc, it more than worth $0.99 per song to me. However I'm paying for that convenience, NOT out of some weird moral calling. The companies need to learn to work that angle. Give me a product that WORKS - and works everywhere - with a price that's high enough to make a profit but still low enough that it's worth it to people to get it this way rather than resorting to the back alley ways. Price it too high or bog it down with DRM and I have absolutely no issue going back to getting my music and/or movies via P2P.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  11. Re:You're paying for the content , not the format by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is supply and demand. The motives for people buying the goods at a given price is irrelevant - it could be mind control from the planet Zog , it makes no difference. The fact that they are willing to do so is all that matters.

  12. Re:You're paying for the content , not the format by killmenow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is supply and demand. The motives for people buying the goods at a given price is irrelevant - it could be mind control from the planet Zog , it makes no difference. The fact that they are willing to do so is all that matters.

    Well, that's demand anyway. The idea of "Supply and Demand" is that prices fluctuate based on shifts in either. But MP3s on Amazon or iTunes are in unlimited supply so according to supply and demand the price for them (regardless of demand) should approach $0.

    I'm not suggesting that supply and demand don't factor into real world prices of physical products. But I am suggesting that the reason buying an MP3/AAC "album" on iTunes/Amazon is still priced close to the same cost as buying the physical CD *and* why the price for a newly released CD is still $9.99 - $13.99 (on average) even though the cost to manufacture them has dropped significantly since the early days of CDs is NOT supply and demand but due to price anchoring. Hell, Amazon still shows "list prices" of almost all CDs and has them CROSSED OUT so you can see how much "you save" when you buy it even though NOBODY is paying $18.98 for a new Taylor Swift CD. And that IS price anchoring.