Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Risky Tablet Announcement

itwbennett writes "The New York Times describes the tablet announcement that Steve Ballmer is supposed to make in his CES opening keynote tonight as 'one of Steve Ballmer's riskiest trade show moves in years.' And blogger Peter Smith is in complete agreement. Here's why: 'Whether or not this announcement is intended as a direct response to the much-rumored Apple event that may or may not be happening on January 27th, consumers will perceive it as one,' says Smith. And if Microsoft unveils a traditional tablet then 'they'll be up against the (presumably more expensive) iTablet and the cult of Apple.' But if the device is the dual-screen Courier that we heard about back in September then it'll be up against the (presumably less expensive) enTourage eDGe, says Smith."

338 comments

  1. Courier by sopssa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The huge borders of enTourage eDGe really put me off. It looks like something from the 80's and only the other screen is LCD, other one is e-ink. While you can probably get more battery power only using the e-ink one for reading, a lot of other possibilities are lost for Courier's 2x LCD screens. And I dont really need that long battery power, as I'm mostly looking for something to use on sofa or bed. I don't think Microsoft has anything to worry about enTourage eDGe.

    I really hope the announcement is Courier. It looks kickass, and it would be immediate choice over iTablet or other traditional tablets. Holding a tablet that is book like while laying on sofa makes just a lot more sense and is a lot more comfortable. And when you're done, you can just close it like a book. If it's Courier, Microsoft is up for a good battle with Apple. If it's a normal tablet, meh.

    1. Re:Courier by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would like to point out that the OP posted using their account, while you posted as a coward.

      Just saying...

    2. Re:Courier by nine-times · · Score: 4, Informative

      The huge borders of enTourage eDGe really put me off.

      The article says that it's a prototype, and the production version is supposed to be a lot more sleek.

    3. Re:Courier by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of my friends heard from his friend that his uncle's coworker heard that the Courier will be offered at a significantly marked-down price of $99 to people that have a Hotmail account that is at least 3 years old (the device will be $529 for everyone else). They will be partnering with T-Mobile to offer unlimited data service for the device starting at $20/month. They're also going to be announcing a new VOIP service that offers free unlimited calling to and from anywhere in the United States for a flat rate of 0.1 cents per minute and the VOIP software built-in to the Courier will be able to work over WiFi or T-Mobile's data network. You can use any compatible Bluetooth headset or there will be a port for a wired headset that is included. Let's see Apple try to top this announcement! Wouldn't that be cool if this was all true??

    4. Re:Courier by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "One of my friends heard from his friend that his uncle's coworker heard that the Courier will be offered at a significantly marked-down price,,,"

      My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who saw Ferris pass-out at 31 Flavors last night.

      I guess it's pretty serious.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Courier by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The huge borders of enTourage eDGe really put me off.

      For me, it is the egregious use of funky capitalizations.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    6. Re:Courier by artemis67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the contrary, I don't really see a second screen as adding that much more value, particularly when the expanded size looks to be roughly the same as the rumored iTablet -- plus, you have the dead space of the hinge dividing the screens.

      I'm sure that there will be covers for the iTablet that will fold over the screen, just like there are for the Kindle. So the only real advantage of the Courier would be that it folds into half the length of the iTablet (while doubling the height).

    7. Re:Courier by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      I heard that the kids of every parent who buys one will get a pony.

    8. Re:Courier by sopssa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just liking some of the products and ideas doesn't make one a fanboy. In fact, I think Linux owns in server environments, and IIS is shit. I like PS3 more than 360. I do think Windows is better in desktop environment than Linux (partly because I play games too). I do think paid-for software model is better than selling your soul to advertisers (a la Google). I wouldn't ever touch MS's keyboards or mouses - I like my Logitech ones. I do like the Courier concept, because frankly it suits my needs better (laying on sofa conveniently using it like a book).

      Merely liking some of the companies products or thinking the same way about how the software development is financed (paid-for software or subsidized with advertisement and lost privacy) doesn't make one a fanboy, even less so if you have critical thinking and can see past the "but everything must be open source by principle", or "no other than Apple for me!" thinking.

    9. Re:Courier by dangitman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It looks kickass, and it would be immediate choice over iTablet or other traditional tablets.

      Seeing as the "iTablet" has not even been announced, I don't know how you could assume that.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    10. Re:Courier by flahwho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you must be one of those Linux, PS3, Bloatware, Logitech, Courier Fanboys!

      -- Now that's a sig.

    11. Re:Courier by Aeros · · Score: 1

      You just gotta deal with these idiots on here who have to bitch about someone or something other than actually commenting on the article. Now back to the article... I have been wanting to get a tablet for awhile now but not happy with anything out there. I was happy to see that apple "might" come out with one soon and was thinking that would be a good option since I like apple products even though their way over-priced. Since im mainly a windows user im happy to see that MS also "might" be coming out with something.

    12. Re:Courier by Aeros · · Score: 1

      who knows..maybe they will come out with 2 versions. One with two smaller screens that folds and one with a single large screen.

    13. Re:Courier by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      I think the Courier looks awesome, and that enTourage thing looks like it's for a 5 year-old. Do I get to be branded as a shill too? Just curious is all. Let me guess, you're a shill for Apple aren't you? I can play this game too.

    14. Re:Courier by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      Let me also add...

      The iTablet has been rumored to be a multimedia device (i.e., watching movies). If that turns out to be true, it would be a huge leap over the Courier, which would only be able to watch a movie on a much smaller screen.

    15. Re:Courier by siloko · · Score: 1

      and superfluous use of 'funky' turns you on?

    16. Re:Courier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh goes the joke over clueless!mod's head. Forget to install your emotion chip today you stupid fucking robot?

    17. Re:Courier by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      AND A COMPLETE LACK OF CAPITALIZATION AMUSES YOU, DOESN'T IT?

      random text because slashdot doesn't like so many capitals... random text because slashdot doesn't like so many capitals...

    18. Re:Courier by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The article says that it's a prototype, and the production version is supposed to be a lot more sleek.

      And this is why Apple consistently wins. It would never ever show something that ugly and clunky, even as a "prototype".

      And as for Microsoft's tablet? The hardware doesn't matter. The software will still suck. I've seen their tablet PC software before. It's sucked for years and, even with Vist... uh, Win7 as a basis and with multi-touch hung like a giant set of balls on the side (which is how it will be integrated, it will suck now. How do we know this? We know this because it will still have to work with all of the other sucky Microsoft software out there. And even if they have Microsoft Office Sucky Tablet Edition ready to go, they wouldn't have changed the UI enough for fear of breaking the eleventy bazillion other pieces of sucky software that runs on Windows. So it is a give that the software will suck. And, as such, it won't matter what they do with the hardware. They could paint it hot pink and give it a baboon's ass - it's running Windows. Ergo, "Suck Inside".

      --
      That is all.
    19. Re:Courier by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Thank you, Simone.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    20. Re:Courier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would like to point out that the OP posted using their account

      How else will MS accounts department know who to pay?

      Kidding aside, most of the astroturfing on Slashdot is done by call-center employees. They're "encouraged" to participate in tech and social networking sites.

    21. Re:Courier by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The Courier and the eDGe are not even in the same f'ing BALLPARK as each other. One is an ereader with a small lcd. One is a sexy executive style notebook powered by an unusual OneNote type interface and (presumably) Exchange & Sharepoint sync support.

    22. Re:Courier by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Chill fella. Here is something to cheer you up, try to think of an even more lame name than Zune for Steve (uncle fester) Ballmer to pick for the new tablet, one that his uncle (would that be grand uncle fester) is sure to buy. There ought to be a slashdot poll for the worst possible names for the new M$ tablet, I'm leaning for the 'Suppository', the tablet that so far ahead of the pack, it's at your back door already ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the last thing Mr. Ballmer wants to hold up is a me-too device.

    Huh, and here I was thinking that was precisely what he wanted to hold up. A "Me-Too" device that is the only authorized Windows Tablet for Windows 7. And it will sync with all your Microsoft crap and even let you carry around your Microsoft DRM'd media. Just like I'm sure Apple's tablet will do the same thing with Apple replaced for Microsoft.

    Meanwhile here I'll sit with my eeePC running some flavor of Linux wondering when I'll get a tablet that provides support for open source.

    Whether or not this announcement is intended as a direct response to the much-rumored Apple event that may or may not be happening on January 27th, consumers will perceive it as one

    Oh no! Then surely consumers will see this as Microsoft entering another market they aren't experts in and not buy the MS Tablet just like how no one bought the original XBox ... oh, wait. Well, surely all those consumers will see through this ruse just like they did when Microsoft released the Zune ... oh, wait, that's still being shoved down our throats and people are still buying it.

    And if Microsoft unveils a traditional tablet then 'they'll be up against the (presumably more expensive) iTablet and the cult of Apple.' But if the device is the dual-screen Courier, that we heard about back in September then it'll be up against the (presumably less expensive) enTourage eDGe

    And the fact of the matter is that it doesn't matter if the market is large enough. Take the PS3 Vs XBox360 vs Wii console war. The XBox360 wasn't as powerful or as expensive as the PS3 yet wasn't as cheap as the Wii. And yet people gobbled them up.

    The sad fact of the matter is that when you're the top dog in a lucrative industry and you're generating epic revenue, you have this peculiar ability to pay people to assess markets and then simply enter them by mirroring your opponents' every move in those markets. And you know what? With a good enough marketing team and a big enough brand name, you can't fail. Two tired adages: 1) You need money to make money. 2) The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. These apply on all scales.

    For how much us tech savvy people will be able to bash Microsoft's tablet, it will turn a profit. Trust me, I don't say that as a fan I say that as a fact.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then surely consumers will see this as Microsoft entering another market they aren't experts in

      Entering? I've lots count of how many failed tablets Microsoft has come out with.

    2. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by psbrogna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Garnering majority market share may be a given but making a profit at it is is not and should be considered an independent variable. They spend a metric-butt-ton of money on marketing getting the market share AND they subsidize costs of entry (and even consumer costs; ie. selling a STB below cost) with other parts of the empire (ie. making a profit on titles when they sell a STB cost). While your evidence is compelling, it supports the former case (market lead) and not the latter (profitability).

    3. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by digitalgiblet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My favorite part is the statement in the NYT about MS releasing a "Me-Too" device.

      A "Me-Too" device that is one of a long line of such devices that have run their OS.

      A "Me-Too" device that is announced before the Apple device.

      A "Me-Too" device that is announced before the SUPPOSED Apple device that has not been confirmed by Apple.

      Enough of the silly repetition. It is getting repetitive.

      I can't say whether the MS device will be worth a spit. I can't say whether the Apple device will be worth a spit. I just like saying spit.

      Can't really say if suddenly tablets are going to be cool and people will start buying them. Bill Gates thought so back in the early '90s. Hasn't happened yet. Steve Jobs killed tablet projects like he was playing whack-a-mole for years. Who knows?

    4. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by jpmorgan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You know why people buy the XBox 360, and why the ZuneHD is surprisingly popular? Because they're good products. And if the Courier is as good as some of the leaks suggest, people will buy it too.

      You can sit there with your eeePC, ranting about stupid consumers and your holy war against the Microsoft empire. The rest of us will carry on not caring.

    5. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Nope, It's ballmers Senility kicking in. This is Microsoft 4th reintroduction of the tablet PC. Every one has been an utter failure, and this one will be as well.

      If I cant get 10 hours of full performance run time from these things, I.E. On and running at full speed the ENTIRE WORKDAY on a single charge then it's a piece of crap. I have owned every Tablet pc from the Very first Dauphin DTR-1 and they all SUCK for usefulness because of the lack of run time per charge.

      If the iSlate is NOT A pc but a giant version of the iPod touch and can deliver 3X the battery life of one then it will start to be a useful device. but it has to have the ability for me to use it as a virtual legal pad. Screw handwriting recognition, that's simply a dog and pony show that never works.

      Now give me a camera on the face pointing at me and a software app to do videoconferencing from it.

      I dont care who makes it (I prefer non apple so it will at least display and allow markup on the evil Office suite files)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by joerdie · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that I agree with you. While I do not have any experience with th Zune, (but have heard great things about Marketplace)the X-Box 360 is NOT a quality product. It has a failure rate above every console ever released, the max graphical capability is above the Wii but well below the PS3, and it's online play costs the consumer money.

    7. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I normally buy every major console with each generation, so don't assume this some fanboy rant, but I can't imagine wanting to buy a 360.

      Fans and the media wanted to compare the cheap 360 with no HDD to the most expensive PS3 SKU's and pretend there was a huge cost disparity. At most times, the price difference between truly comparable 360 and PS3 models (both having similar HDDs) was $50.

      So for $50 in price difference I get a free BluRay player, free online play, the ability to put in any cheap HDD I want easily without voiding warranty, and the ability to install Linux.

      Even better, Sony had a deal where they'd give you $150 off the price of a PS3 with the Playstation card. (Said deal is down to $100 off). When the PS3 80 GB model was $400, I bought it brand new for $250. That sure as heck beat paying $350 for the 360.

      My PS3 doesn't get particularly hot. I've never had problems with it. The 360 eats discs, runs super hot, and has something like a 40% hardware failure rate.

      Please tell me again that the 360 is a good product in comparison.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    8. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by musicalmicah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hasn't Microsoft only lost money on the X-Box AND the Zune? I don't see how comparing the new tablet to either of these ventures can lead to the argument that it will be successful. Sure, it'll sell, but will it profit?

    9. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Funny

      But there have been *ahem* rumors about the Apple tablet for a long time! So obviously Ballmer is just trying to one-up Apple by releasing more than a rumor.

      One thing I have learned: no matter how good a Microsoft product, press release, statement, or design is, it is always bad if you talk to some people, and it's not innovative. Furthermore, Microsoft - unlike most companies - tries to make a profit. Apple, on the other hand, is trying to be innovative and produce quality machines at as low prices as they can possible do out of the altruistic kindness of their heart :) Er, core.

    10. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, Linux and OSS never get a press conference (who would hold it, after all?). All of these trade shows tend to come down to a pissing contest between Apple and MS, or Verizon/AT&T/Sprint/T-Mobile or whoever, and open source and Linux get overlooked once again. Ask anyone at CES about open source and they'll just stare at you blankly. These trade shows are just a great big proprietary/capitalism/closed-source circle-jerk.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 1

      Well, surely all those consumers will see through this ruse just like they did when Microsoft released the Zune ... oh, wait, that's still being shoved down our throats and people are still buying it.

      It all worked up until that point...

      --
      "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
    12. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XBox360 also came out a year before the PS3 or the Wii. I'm sure that had something to do with it.

    13. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Please tell me again that the 360 is a good product in comparison.

      Because limiting your gaming platforms (if you can afford to not do so, obviously) is a silly idea. Again, money permitting, if you can afford the maximum number of platforms to play games on, why wouldn't you? Project Sylpheed, Blue Dragon, Crackdown/Crackdown 2, Ninja Blade, 'Splosion Man, Fable II, Geometry Wars, I Made a Game With Zombies In It, Shadow Complex...and many others. There are a LOT of great games you can ONLY play on a 360. I don't know about you, but I'm quite happy to have the experiences of as many games as possible added to my collective gaming memory.

      Not to mention Netflix streaming with a PS3 sucks horribly. It is a much better system for media streaming and playback, but for Netflix? Horrible.

    14. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Tablet supporting open source? Have you looked at the Touch Book by always innovating? It is a hybrid netbook/tablet with a touch screen that docks with a keyboard unit that run an angstrom linux distro. Last news I heard was they shipped a few hundred of the first release and are currently accumulating orders for a second production run.

    15. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      The two 360 titles I really cared about were Mass Effect and Bioshock. Bioshock eventually went PS3, but I just picked both up on the PC.

      I thought Fable was horribly overrated. I beat it in 20 hours, and the game became extremely easy once I realized it had a broken mechanic. There was a spell that gave you a shield where you didn't take damage. You could earn exponential experience if you maintained a combo of hitting without taking damage. You cast the spell, hit enemies, lathered, rinsed and repeated. Not a single fight in the game presented any challenge, and I had a maxed character almost immediately.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    16. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Arcady13 · · Score: 4, Informative

      (I prefer non apple so it will at least display and allow markup on the evil Office suite files)

      You know that they make Office for Mac, right? And that the iPhone/Touch can display Office files out of the box, right? There are iPhone/Touch apps to allow you to edit them too.

    17. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After being stomped by Apple in the MP3 market, the digital content delivery market, and the current-gen smartphone market, I have no problem believing that Microsoft is taking their Apple rumors VERY seriously these days.

      Apple DOES try to make a profit -- that's why they typically have among the highest profit margins in the industry for their hardware.

    18. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Screw handwriting recognition

      I have to agree on that. I think the best part of the Newton was that it could be treated like (by design) a sketch pad. It was something I felt all other PDA's were lacking.

      Also, the fact that it was fax oriented was pretty cute, but I bought mine years after the end of life as a novelty.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    19. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Pojut · · Score: 1

      There were a bunch of games I didn't include (Gears of War, Mass Effect, Bioshock, etc.) since you could play them on other platforms...I was listing games that you could ONLY play on the 360.

      Honestly, for me, Shadow Complex and 'Splosion Man ALONE were worth the cost of a 360. Good platformers are hard to find nowadays, and finding two of them that could arguably be considered two of the best ever made is quite a treat.

      That being said, Mass Effect was an unbelievably amazing game in spite of its technical shortcomings...Mass Effect 2 can't get here soon enough.

    20. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      I hate that my XBox 360 sounds like a jet engine every time I turn it on.

      Use it as a multimedia station? Yeah, what a joke. I have to crank the volume on everything so I can hear it about the sound of the 360.

    21. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Locutus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft wishes they could create something which makes a profit but they don't really have to, they've been running on the Windows OS and MS Office gravy trains for over 2 decades. Zune+Xbox+WindowsCE=billions in losses but that's ok, it keeps the perception Microsoft and Windows are important and valuable so Windows keeps racking in the dough. IMO

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    22. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Pojut · · Score: 1

      You know...headphones work much better if you put them on your head instead of leaving them on a table...

    23. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just to attempt to quantify what a "metric-butt-ton" is: According to wikipedia, MS had lost about $4 billion on the xboxes by the end of 2005 and about $1 billion to replace bricked xbox 360s. Their most recent quarterly report from Q1 2010 (Oct. 23rd) showed that their entire entertainment division posted a $312 million profit. I have no idea what the total take is, but just to recoup the $5 billion we know they lost would take over four years of quarters like Q1 2010. If every quarter has been like Q1 2010, that would mean they would be breaking even just about now, except the entertainment division at MS never posted a profit until 2008! So it's a good bet that MS has even now not yet recouped the losses from developing the xbox. They're rich though, they can afford to wait for years and years to recoup an investment.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    24. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, surely all those consumers will see through this ruse just like they did when Microsoft released the Zune ... oh, wait, that's still being shoved down our throats and people are still buying it.

      Really? A vast majority of my friends have an iPod (hell, my mother has one and she's a techno-neanderthal) but I don't know a single person who has a Zune. Not one. Nobody. Now, I'm sure some people are buying them but I'd wager it's not making waves and deserves to be overlooked when talking about Microsoft managing to successfully sell a product in a market in which they are considered novices.

      And I'll be kind and let the XBox one go because it has sold in considerable numbers despite the fact that it seems to have a 100%+ failure rate (over 100% because people have had multiple failures with a single XBox...).

    25. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Well, surely all those consumers will see through this ruse just like they did when Microsoft released the Zune ... oh, wait, that's still being shoved down our throats and people are still buying it.

      Pardon?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    26. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by perigee369 · · Score: 1

      You should probably check your facts on the current "consoles". You will find out that the Wii has outsold the Xbox 360 and the PS3 by almost double. (Wii 54 mil., X360 32 mil., PS3 27 mil.) And your insistence that MS will win the market buy just throwing enough $$$ at it? You have heard of the Zune, and Zune HD right? Granted, the do have a good share of the keyboard and mouse market...

    27. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      iWork has support for Word, Excel, and Powerpoint. If Apple doesn't provide an iWork iSlave app, surely someone else will write an app with some MS Office support.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    28. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by linj · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile here I'll sit with my eeePC running some flavor of Linux wondering when I'll get a tablet that provides support for open source.

      To be honest, I'm not sure an open source tablet would make it that big. There's not excellent support throughout, say, Linux, yet. At least it's not as mature as that of Windows 7, which is much better than that of Windows Vista, which was super-awesome compared to that of Windows XP. Plus, OneNote is what makes Tablet PCs pretty good on Windows (although Evernote, I hear, is pretty good too).

    29. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Ahhh!! Spit and hellfire!!

    30. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      The xbox isn't a good example seeing how really not many people did buy the original xbox and it lost billions. The 360 took off purely because it was first out the door. They rushed it and it turned out to be shoddy hardware so, while it should be making a profit now it took forever and was quickly beaten by outdated hardware (the Wii) and if you compare same years (ie year 1 360 sales to year 1 PS3 sales) the PS3 sold more than the 360 so really the only thing that saved the 360 was being the first out the door. There is no guarantee they'll get that next time and if they don't impress US customers they're screwed seeing how the 360 is only really a success in the US and UK.

      I wouldn't say the Zune is much of a success story either.

    31. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      It's not well below the PS3 by any stretch of the imagination. Both contains GPUs based on the same generation of PC GPUs, and Cell hasn't really been exploited fully yet so that advantage has yet to be seen. I only own a Wii and I'm most likely considering getting a PS3 because of the Blu-Ray, but the 360 is much better than you give it credit for, except of course for the abysmal failure rate. And now you can get a 360 for the same price as a Wii, which is kind of ridiculous in my opinion.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    32. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Yeah the 360 is quality. It's not like they're prone to breaking or anything.

    33. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source tablet exists, the touchbook from alwaysinnovating.

    34. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Feeding a troll I know but...

      When has microsoft ever had a tablet? HP, Toshiba, make the hardware. The only thing I see microsoft providing is the software for it.

      As for the 'failed' attempts by the other companies, they failed due to microsoft or their own hardware choices? Maybe one, the other, or both.

      It looks like microsoft has a tablet totally in mind with windows 7 though. Go to a windows 7 computer (you can wash later) and open computer properties. There is a pen and touch section right there. Most computer say no pen or touch input is available for this display. I have installed windows 7 on 4 tablet laptops so far. All 4 work fine. I needed sound and media card drivers, but the touch input worked right away. Which actually surprised me.

    35. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah so the 360 is so loud so they could sell you Microsoft headphones. http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/digitalcommunication/productdetails.aspx?pid=006

      Everyone is pretty much in agreement that the 360 hardware was abysmal which is no surprise since they rushed it out the door to beat Sony.

    36. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by joerdie · · Score: 1

      I too only have a Wii but my brother owns both a PS3 and a 360. I can say that games look a ton better on the PS3. My complaint there has always been the buy in price but that starts to stray from the topic.

    37. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Aeros · · Score: 1

      yea the 'Me-Too' comment was kind of lame. So if you announce your own product before your competitors rumored product is announced... you have a 'Me-Too' product?

    38. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Paul+Pierce · · Score: 1

      Long-term the gaming industry was something they didn't want to miss. The xbox got in there at just the right time. In another 10 years you'll see other companies trying to get in one way or another. It's definitely nice when you are a large enough company that you can take a loss for years, just so you don't miss the boat - which also lowers prices for the consumer.

    39. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Key word there being "was"...my launch 360 died long ago after a slow painful death, but my 360 with a manufacture date of Auguest 2008 has given me zero problems.

      Don't get me wrong, I love my PS3. I love the power it has, I love how quiet and cool it runs, I love its media abilities (except Netflix, which is ass) and I love its exclusives...but I STILL despise the dual-shock controller.

    40. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by steelfood · · Score: 1

      when I'll get a tablet that provides support for open source.

      I believe there are tables running Android.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    41. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Oops, I meant tablets.

      Though tables that run Android may be a good idea too...

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    42. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is hillarious you put both these paragraphs in the same post:

      For how much us tech savvy people will be able to bash Microsoft's tablet, it will turn a profit. Trust me, I don't say that as a fan I say that as a fact.

      and

      Oh no! Then surely consumers will see this as Microsoft entering another market they aren't experts in and not buy the MS Tablet just like how no one bought the original XBox ... oh, wait. Well, surely all those consumers will see through this ruse just like they did when Microsoft released the Zune ... oh, wait, that's still being shoved down our throats and people are still buying it.

      Concidering the xbox consoles cost Microsoft a lot of money for each time they sell one, and even the Zune costs them money now that their prices are lowered... Yet you compare the tablet to that and think it will make them a profit!

      Little hit, profit means gaining money. Xbox and zune sales COST them money to sell, the exact opposite of profit.

    43. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Knara · · Score: 1

      Factoid: Many folks who use Wacom devices with their computers and Win7 (myself included) ended up having to disable the Tablet Services in Win7, because having a touch surface like that makes Win7 assume that you are using a tablet and makes using Photoshop/Illustrator/Manga Studio/Painter/etc really, really painful.

    44. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Knara · · Score: 1

      I had a 360 that I got about 6 months after launch that finally red-ringed last month. The replacement I got is amazingly quiet, I was shocked.

    45. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by dkf · · Score: 1

      So it's a good bet that MS has even now not yet recouped the losses from developing the xbox.

      You don't know for sure that their booking all the income generated from the xbox through their entertainment division. If some of what they count to be benefit derived from being in that game gets accounted for elsewhere, the division could be run at a huge loss and yet still be a success. It's tricky and devious, but you can bet they've got accountants and lawyers capable of arranging such things.

      It could even be that way for tax reasons.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    46. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS made money on the xbox. It cost them almost $5billion to get the Xbox off the ground, but about 12 months after the 360 was released the announced that the xbox had made the company $1billion over it's life (~5years). Unlike Sony MS has been able to sell the unit with no lose. MS made about $8 on every game sold (by a 3rd party), with literally 10's of millions of of concols (8.5 millon in 2008 alone) and games sold to date I have a hard time beliving they are not turning a profit.

    47. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by nine-times · · Score: 1

      So it's a good bet that MS has even now not yet recouped the losses from developing the xbox

      It's pretty unclear to me from the numbers you cite, but it seems like the XBox could be even less profitable than you're making it sound.

      For example, when you say that MS lost $4 billion on XBoxes, it's not clear to me what that number includes. R&D? Marketing? Selling the consoles at below cost as a loss-leader? The $1 billion number for bricked XBoxes in the Wikipedia article was from June 2007, and I know people who are still getting their XBoxes replaced due to the red ring of death. Finally, when you say that their entertainment division made a $312 profit, that doesn't necessarily mean that the XBoxes were responsible for that profit. What else is in the entertainment division?

      (And please note, I'm not making any real claim about whether or not the XBox 360 has turned a profit yet. I don't know. And as the parent posted, MS has enough money to wait years to recoup the investment, and even has enough money to simply take the loss.)

    48. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple DOES try to make a profit -- that's why they typically have among the highest profit margins in the industry for their hardware.

      woosh

    49. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      Ahem, you have not owned every tablet PC, becuase if you did you would know about Gateway's (now discontinued and sadly not replaced) C-140X. I own one of these tablets, and two years after purchase, after much use, the batteries last almost exactly half as long as they used to, 6 hours. With new batteries, it will run 12 hours no problem. I'm typing this reply on it right now. Yes, it is a bit large (14 inches) and heavy (haven't weighed it, but probably close to 8lbs with batteries) but I've taken notes on it for the past two and a half years, and it has been fantastic. That being said, I think you are looking for something closer to what Lenovo has released with their C2D/snapdragon powered thing. I'm really, really glad Lenovo hasn't turned into another Laptop mill.

    50. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Meanwhile here I'll sit with my eeePC running some flavor of Linux wondering when I'll get a tablet that provides support for open source."
      Buy a Nokia tablet/mid

      And I am not sure that a Microsoft tablet will turn a profit. Not everything Microsoft does turns to gold and not everything Microsoft does is crap.
      I am no Microsoft fanboi. In fact I am a big Linux fan but.
      Microsoft Sync is a very nice bit of kit.
      Microsoft FSX is a very good program.
      The new ZuneHD is a good media player and the ZunePass is very tempting.
      BTW the reason that people are gobbing up the 360 is because of the games. The 360 has a bigger and a lot of people feel better game library than the PS3. Also a lot of users feel the online services are better than those offered by Sony for the PS3 and much better than those offered for the Wii. The reason why the 360 sells is the same reason why Windows sells. Software.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    51. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Xbox project may have been designed to hurt competitors moreso than to be a profit centre.

    52. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I would agree that the hardware is probably pretty solid now but people shouldn't have to wait 2-3 years though for reliable hardware.

    53. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      I have to second you on the Gateway tablets. I have the CX-2750. Same form factor. The now 2 year old batteries still give me about 3.5 hours on balanced power settings. Came with Vista, and was the only computer I have ever seen where Vista was not a POS, it was almost as if that machine was a reference system. Vista actually had slightly better pen tracking that windows 7.

      For those who say that handwriting recognition is a trick and never works. I write on mine all the time, in cursive and it has no trouble with the recognition. I don't even remember the last time I had to correct it. Of course I have extremely good handwriting, and I did spend 20 minutes training it when I installed windows 7 on it. All in all, except for the weight, its the best computer i have ever owned.

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    54. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      "Enough of the silly repetition. It is getting repetitive."

      You can say that again!

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    55. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by wfolta · · Score: 1

      I think you're taking the "me too" comment in isolation. If Microsoft and Apple popped onto the scene a year ago, no one would call Microsoft's "me too". But MS has a history of things like the Zune and Windows Mobile 6.5 which are definitely "look, we're as cool as Apple" products that are evidently only claim stakes they're putting down in a market they're not doing well in. So their tablet -- even if it's announced two weeks before Apple's -- will be perceived as "me too" that's simply been rushed up to beat Apple to the punch.

      Also, "me too" need not refer to following Apple's lead, but rather to not distinguishing itself from the crowd. Tablets have existed -- and not caught on -- for many years now. It's assumed that Apple will put a different spin on their tablet, as they did on cellphones, which have also existed for many years. Contrast that with MS, who has a history of bland designs or of taking a leap to the "wild" side and ending up with things that are just silly.

      Not to mention MS's propensity to say, "THIS time we got it right! Yeah, our previous version sucked so bad even we're encouraging you to dump it, but THIS TIME...", as they either wildly leap from one design to another, or simply do a little repackaging, rename it and say "This time..." loudly. (I'll never forget the ads for Windows XP that compared how often previous versions of Windows crashed to how often it crashed under XP. Of course, XP crashed orders of magnitude more often than UNIX, but...)

    56. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by wfolta · · Score: 1

      I love the "ZuneHD is surprisingly popular" part. Did you leave out a smiley or something? The fact that it's "surprisingly" popular says a lot about previous generations of Zune, and therefore our expectations, don't you think?

    57. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by geekoid · · Score: 1
      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    58. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Vista has the same thing.
      I think some version of XP had it as well.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    59. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by ErkDemon · · Score: 1

      So Google just announced their unlocked smartphone before Apple can announce what they're going to do with the iPhone (wonder how badly top-line iPhone sales have paused while people wait for the Nexus specs?), MS appear to be about to announce a slate-type device on the ~6th before Apple can announce their (hypothetical) device ... Apple must be feeling like everyone's ganging up on them to rob them of things to announce. I wonder how many days left 'til ASUS announce the spec and launch date of their new EeePad (undermining the iPod Touch)? I suppose Apple might launch an iTunes-based movie distribution channel, but there's still a chance that Sony or Sky might have something up their sleeve ...

    60. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by mgblst · · Score: 1

      If they lost $4 Billion be the end of 2005, and they only posted a profit in 2008, plus the $1 billion write off (which isn't exactly the same as a loss), that means they would probably even owe more than the $5 billion. Unless they were exactly breaking even for 2006, 2007, start of 2008.

      So I agree, xbox has going to be a big waste of money, unless they start making money pretty soon. Which, with there new integreated platform plans they might just.

      They also lost a bucketload on Zunes.

    61. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      A "Me-Too" device that is one of a long line of such devices that have run their OS..

      To be fair, all of Microsoft's past tablet efforts have simply been shoehorning a desktop OS into a tablet. If they're smart, they won't be taking this approach yet again.

      Bill Gates thought so back in the early '90s. Hasn't happened yet.

      Yeah, probably something to do with the shoehorning approach.

      Steve Jobs killed tablet projects like he was playing whack-a-mole for years.

      Probably just waiting for the hardware to catch up. It seems up to the job, now.

    62. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      It could even be that way for tax reasons.

      Pretty much this. If you can cook the books so you're showing a net loss, you're paying a whole lot less in taxes. If MS wasn't making money hand over fist with the Xbox product line, they would have abandoned it years ago like Sega did with the dreamcast. Just a quick glance at their marketing budget should give you an idea of how well they're doing.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    63. Re:A Mimic Device Is Precisely What They Want by kamochan · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be just hilarious if Apple _didn't_ announce a tablet at all? Maybe they're just having fun with all the fuzz and competitor R&D misdirection their speculated announcement is making :-)

      Damn, if they announce iPhone 4G with an imaging display or some such non-tablety gizmo, I want a cookie.

  3. Old Story by GottMitUns · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is Deja Vu all over again. They already had a bunch of pushes for Tablets. Like here:http://www.pencomputing.com/frames/tablet_pc.html Tablet PC is no go. Get over it.

    1. Re:Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I beg to differ.

      There's nothing that equals the experience of using a Tablet PC, whether you are browsing the internet, drawing, playing stupid multitouch games, or taking notes in class.
      The only thing Microsoft got wrong with it is that they've never made the mere existence of the platform known to the normal people. I've lost the count of the times I took my tablet out to take notes and the people next to me dropped their jaws when i converted it to slate mode and started writing on it.

      The Tablet PC is one of the few things I admire Microsoft for, even though saying I'm hostile to them is an euphemism on may occasions.

    2. Re:Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tablet pc might be a no go for the masses, but it would certainly fill a niche market -

      as an illustrator, i love being able to draw directly on my screen. the only problem with proposed modern tablets is that they're all aiming for a 10-11 inch screen - that's the no go for me. i have a toshiba satellite r15 tablet, and it's got a 14 inch screen - anything smaller just wouldn't be workable as a canvas.

      something like a wacom just isn't the same - i don't like the disconnect between where i'm drawing and where my lines appear.

    3. Re:Old Story by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      You write faster with a stylus than you can type? I am surprised.

      A proper knowledge of LaTeX you can even do mathematical notation at a decent rate (and it looks prettier too.) I'll keep my keyboard, thanks.

    4. Re:Old Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where exactly did I say that?

      Besides, there's no real reason to write mad fast during a lesson: if you can take enough notes with pen and paper, you certainly can with a tablet pc, and there are things that simply are more straightforward to do on a tablet, like drawing schemes, writing on a pdf/slides as it was a book, making stupid caricatures of professors...

    5. Re:Old Story by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      I can write faster with a pen and paper then I can type. And I have been using computer for over 20 years. My typing skills suck. It can be related to the fact that I have broken my hands a number of times and my fingers do not move as they should anymore. But handwriting is still what most people were taught first. Which is more natural? Writing by hand or typing on a keyboard? Some may prefer typing to writing, but there are enough people who do not type and are faster writing by hand that a true digital tablet would work for them.

    6. Re:Old Story by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      There's nothing that equals the experience of using a Tablet PC

      I took that to mean that a Tablet PC was superior in every respect for notetaking. I suppose you simply meant that it was completely different.

    7. Re:Old Story by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The difference is that, this time, Jobs will engage his reality distortion field. And everyone else wants to be on that train for a ride, at least while that lasts.

    8. Re:Old Story by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      There's nothing that equals the experience of using a Tablet PC

      Yeah, and there's nothing that equals the experience of having river parasites swim up your pee-stream into your urethra.

      I don't like tablets made by MS or otherwise (in case you couldn't tell by my analogy).

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:Old Story by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I've lost the count of the times I took my tablet out to take notes and the people next to me dropped their jaws when i converted it to slate mode and started writing on it.

      I'm sure many of those jaws would have retracted if they had used one for an extended period of time. While those tablets might have been great for techies and niches, they're pretty clunky to use, certainly now that the iPhone has shown people how great a touchscreen interface can be.

  4. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think even Apple cultists will agree that tablets are currently a niche market at best. iMac, iPod, and iPhone all serve well-defined markets that were established before these specific products were available. People have tried to push tablets over the years and, to put it mildly, have not met with much success. What is the iSlate (or whatever) bringing to the table that will have it succeed where others have failed? I've read all the rumors have have not been particularly impressed; I guess we'll have to wait and see.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Microsoft's earlier attempts to push out a tablet PC had a few differences:

      1) It relied on a stylus
      2) It used a traditional UI (standard windows with some extra apps)

      To address the two points:

      1) Apple, presumably Microsoft, and various toher companies working on "modern" tablets are clearly going for touchscreen. Just like the stylus has been largely abandoned in the smartphone market, moving to touchscreens for tablets could make them a heck of a lot more accessible; styluses are another layer removing the user from the content, they don't work as well with gestures (flick-to-scroll feels a lot less natural), they don't have any equivalent to multi-touch, etc.

      2) Tablet PC was just Windows with some handwriting recognition stuff tossed in. Apple (and I presume Microsoft and others) are going, this time, with completely different UIs. Apple is using the iPhone interface scaled up, which is a touch-screen interface to begin with. I assume Microsoft will also have something similar, although hopefully not based on Windows Mobile (or it will bomb).

      I see a few uses for a touch-based tablet:

      1) eBook reader. They don't have the power advantage of eInk here, but they do get the advantage of colour. Useless in novels, useful for textbooks, magazines, etc. Apple has tried to pull this off on the iPhone, but it's a decidedly sub-standard experience due to the tiny screen.

      2) PMP. A 10" screen at arms length is a lot bigger than the 3.5" screens you get in most PMPs or smartphones.

      3) Browser. Browsing on smartphones has made incredible leaps forward in the past few years, starting with Opera's work and continuing with mobile Safari. Smartphone browsing is pretty close to desktop browsing, except for the tiny screens. Scale that up to a high res 10" screen and suddenly you've got something that can dispay websites at full size without having to zoom.

      It seems that the current approach to tablets is more about taking the smartphone experience and removing the limitations of screen size, rather than the previous approach which was to take the laptop PC experience and switch the input and form factor. I think that this new approach will be much more successful.

      The price point is important too. The latest leaks from Apple have them considering a $1000 pricepoint, which I believe is lower than what most Tablet PCs sold for.

    2. Re:Who cares? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

      eBook reader. They don't have the power advantage of eInk here, but they do get the advantage of colour.

      Battery life isn't the only advantage of eInk for readers -- it's easier on the eyes for long use than LCDs, too.

    3. Re:Who cares? by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

      I just got an n900 -- and while they got some things wrong, they got the touchscreen exactly right:
      High-resolution LCD and resistive touchscreen. It's still easy to operate with the fingertips (though it needs a bit more pressure than my Android G1 screen did), but when you need precision, there's a stylus tucked in so tightly that it's almost invisible unless you know it's there. Pull it out and scribble away with it, and then when you're done, it hides again, and the display is still perfect for fingers.

      I originally thought it was a gimmick -- now I want it included in your dream tablet.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Der+PC · · Score: 1

      You are both right and wrong there.

      1) The table UI relied on a stylus up to the point when the UMPC was introduced. At that point, Microsoft changed their guidelines about the TPC platform, allowinf for low-resolution screens (e.g. 800x600) and touch-panels instead of digitizers.

      2) Correct - this has always been the fallacy of the TPC platform. To implement a groundbreaking hardware interface and accompany it with a interface built around a model 1968 input method is like incorporating the Ford Edsel into the space shuttle replacement program.

      Your addressing of points:

      1) No, they would be going for a hybrid. A touch-only interface renders the device half-useless, as you won't write much or draw using your finger, regardless of how much you use that pencil-sharpener on it. If you go with touch-only, you will have an oversized iPhone that will be the biggest flop since the square wheel.

      2) You are just fishing here.

      Your uses for a tablet:

      1) Yes and no - depending on the resolution, colour gamut and amount of reflection, the device might range from piss poor to fairly good. It will however never match reading from a matte surface like e-paper (or regular paper).

      2) No. As a PMP, a tablet will be way too big. Most people I know wouldn't even go with a iPod Touch, but rather with a nano. Size matters, and a PMP shouldn't be noticed, only heard.

      3) You don't need a tablet for a browser - you can already do that with almost any home appliance that has an ethernet interface. To recreate the tablet as some über-browser is daft. And pricey.

      And a little research wouldn't have hurt. The Dell XT2 XFR starts at $3599. The Lenovo X-series tablet starts at $1879 ($1509 with rebate). The Electrovaya Scribbler slate is at $2049. The Motion Computing J3400 starts at $2299.

      So your $1000 mark is way off.

      I do however expect Apple to price their iSlate/iTablet/iWhatever well below $1000. Apple, unlike Microsoft, hasn't just got the task of winning new ground, they also have the task of catching up where Microsoft actually was ahead. And in handwriting recognition, Microsoft is way ahead of Apple, and unless Apple recently acquired ParaGraph, Paragon or any other HWR software developer, I'd say they have a challenge to meet they didn't even foresee.

      But, that's just speculation, and will be revealed at the end of the month.

      Personally, I look forward to see what Microsoft has in store.

      --
      This signature is DRM protected. By the DMCA, you are not allowed to counteract or oppose to it.
    5. Re:who cares? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      They still have a desktop OS? I haven't seen Xenix in years. Oh wait, they bought SUSE, didn't they?

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    6. Re:Who cares? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      iMac, iPod, and iPhone all serve well-defined markets that were established before these specific products were available.

      I have to disagree there. MP3 players were pretty niche before the iPod. Same goes for smartphones, although not to the same extent.

      What is the iSlate (or whatever) bringing to the table that will have it succeed where others have failed?

      A decent interface? The same thing that has made both the iPod and iPhone household names. Not to mention the iTunes store and a strong developer community.

      I'm not sure if Apple's tablet will be as popular as either the iPod or iPhone, but I'm sure it will be a success and ignite the tablet industry.

    7. Re:Who cares? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      2) No. As a PMP, a tablet will be way too big. Most people I know wouldn't even go with a iPod Touch, but rather with a nano. Size matters, and a PMP shouldn't be noticed, only heard.

      Have you tried watching a movie on a nano? It's not exactly a good experience. You're thinking of DAPs (Digital Audio Player), not a PMP (Portable Media Player). PMP would mean video, and a 10" screen does a lot better at that than a 2 or 3" screen on a smartphone.

      3) You don't need a tablet for a browser - you can already do that with almost any home appliance that has an ethernet interface. To recreate the tablet as some über-browser is daft. And pricey.

      What do you expect an iSlab or whatnot to be used for, then? Any home appliance with an ethernet surface might be able to browse the web, but I wouldn't exactly want to take my refrigerator on the train with me. The advances made in browsing on the most recent crop of smartphones is indeed impressive, but I often find myself trying to browse on my iPhone and thinking "I wish that I had my laptop with me..."

      Although, I'm more interested in smartbooks for this purpose. Marvell was showing off a rather impressive product at CES. Thinner and lighter than a Macbook Air, with a 4 hour battery life, 12" screen and full size keyboard, able to play HD video (acceleration), and an expected retail cost of $200.

      And a little research wouldn't have hurt. The Dell XT2 XFR starts at $3599. The Lenovo X-series tablet starts at $1879 ($1509 with rebate). The Electrovaya Scribbler slate is at $2049. The Motion Computing J3400 starts at $2299.

      So your $1000 mark is way off.

      Huh? You're just reinforcing my point. Apple leaked their intended price as $1000, which is far cheaper than all your examples. So... What's your point? Just as I said, $1000 is indeed much lower than what most Tablet PCs sold for.

    8. Re:Who cares? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      MP3 players were niche, but the portable music players (including cassette, CD and minidisc players) were not. The iPod targets this pre-existing market, just with a newer technology.

      In the iPhone's case, I'd consider the 'dumb' phone and smartphone markets to be two sides of the same coin, rather than distinct markets. Selling a tablet to the consumer as a functional device is much more difficult than persuading a dumb phone user to upgrade to a smartphone.

  5. 1st vendor to release a PADD from TNG gets my $ by Vandil+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Including the ability for me to skin the UI with an LCARS theme without "jailbreaking" or flashing custom firmware.

    I'm serious.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:1st vendor to release a PADD from TNG gets my $ by maxume · · Score: 1

      I believe you, but I'm curious, what do you find so attractive about some writer's fantasy from the 1980s?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:1st vendor to release a PADD from TNG gets my $ by aztektum · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:1st vendor to release a PADD from TNG gets my $ by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1
      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:1st vendor to release a PADD from TNG gets my $ by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      It's not fantasy, it's SCIENCE FICTION you insensitive clod!

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    5. Re:1st vendor to release a PADD from TNG gets my $ by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Including the non-existence of networking? Remember how they'd all have stacks of the things and have people actually delivering them about the ship? And yes, I'd buy one too. Guess the Tricorder app from the android market will have to do for now...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  6. Microsoft's Risky Tablet Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft's Risky Tablet Announcement

    Even though this is Microsoft, I am absolutely overjoyed to see a reduced instruction set compu-tablet.

    Yuck, yuck, yuck. (seriously though, it has an Intel Atom)

    BTW, Hackers seems topical:

    DADE: It has a killer refresh rate.
    KATE: P6 chip. Triple the speed of the Pentium.
    DADE: Yeah. It's not just the chip, it has a PCI bus. But you knew that.
    KATE: Indeed. RISC architecture is gonna change everything.
    DADE: Yeah. RISC is good.

    1. Re:Microsoft's Risky Tablet Announcement by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It wont, it will run Embedded XP or worse Embedded Vista. IT's not really a reduced instruction set. It's just not a full flavor OS install.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Microsoft's Risky Tablet Announcement by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I'd woosh you, but I suspect I'd have to woosh you a second time, for not even getting what I meant by "woosh".

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  7. Ballmertainment by Improv · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope he throws it while chanting DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS...

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Ballmertainment by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You mean it will be the table that accompanies the already flying chairs, when he hears that it will be as “successful” as the Zune? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  8. If MS thinks they're attcking Apple.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the NYT is reading too much into this. First of all, Apple has it's own market. The folks who buy their products and are fans are not going to be swayed too much, if at all, by a cheaper price from MS for a similar gadget. Apple has proven that they can charge what they charge and their market sticks with them: the early adopters will pay the price. And those who won't pay the price will wait because we know that Apple will drop the price in the future.

    The MS market is for those of us that are price conscious, the corporate market that locked themselves into MS solutions, and believe it or not, there are folks who actually like MS and HP products and even prefer them over Apple.

    My point is that Apple is in their own league (and market) and any announcement from MS et al. isn't for their (Apple's or their users) benefit - it's for the MS fans that may want a tablet device. It also shows that MS is "keeping up".

    MS isn't the power house that they once were. They're more like the obese ex-college football star that thinks they're still the big fast hunk they once were - that's another post from the Anonymous Business and Marketing Analyst.

    1. Re:If MS thinks they're attcking Apple.... by Rand310 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guarantee that there will be a 'Apple vs MS vs etc' column that will be posted shortly after each device's debut. Not only do MS and Apple want to be on that list, but a whole host of other companies are releasing products right now just so that they too can be on that list. It would be quite possible to suck up a decent amount of free market space by riding off of Apple's announcement. Apple released this device with these features at this price point, while CompanyA released a similar device with these features at this price point. CompanyA automatically gets free news, a shot at a market and possibly even sales all while riding Apple's momentum.

    2. Re:If MS thinks they're attcking Apple.... by Locutus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know that people are not talking about Windows Mobile anymore and many are talking about Android as opposed to iPhone. And you would be surprised at how many people who've used Microsoft for a long time are talking about getting an Apple computer instead of a Windows based box. The price hits them the most and the financially stable ones are getting Apples while the others fall back on the WinTel bandwagon because of price. The iPod opened up peoples minds to something other than Microsoft, the iPhone blew the doors open along with a compelling OSX operating system and nice looking hardware.

      Microsoft can't afford to look like they are losing anything because when that switch is thrown, the house of cards falls and falls fast. People are funny that way.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    3. Re:If MS thinks they're attcking Apple.... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      One problem MS has had is in the consumer space. When it comes to enterprise offerings, MS is still very strong but their forays into the consumer space haven't been as successful. The only product that has shown any success is the Xbox but that hasn't been financially successful as the Xbox has cost the company $8 billion in debt. If Xbox was a standalone company they would have had to fold by now.

      MS has had tablets for years and if Apple releases their tablet, we'll the same pattern where MS has more of the business market share and Apple has more of the consumer market share.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:If MS thinks they're attcking Apple.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much yes, but I'll suggest MS has a market erosion problem with Apple. They do not have separate markets, as much as adjoined markets with a shoreline. Pick whichever you like to play the Ocean and the Land, but Apple has made visible landscape gains with laptops over the last five years. Add iPod and iPhone, and Apple has become the one to watch for defining the new tablet concept, not MS.

      So I'll slightly disagree that this is for "MS fans" -- they're just not a significant portion of the overall market. This announcement is for businesses. They know they'll have employees who can use tablets. The Apple tablet hype has begun and purchase managers have begun to wonder if MS is going to do tablets, or if they're going to have to start thinking about how to work with an Apple product in their MS centered business. Equipment rollout is not instant in businesses; they have leadtimes for financing and tech issues, like 6 months.

      And MS has just said 'YES'. Purchasing managers across MS's major market have just let out a collective sigh of relief. Going ahead into the future quarters, purchase managers now know they will supply the internal demand for tablets with familiar MS products.

    5. Re:If MS thinks they're attcking Apple.... by westlake · · Score: 1

      MS isn't the power house that they once were. They're more like the obese ex-college football star that thinks they're still the big fast hunk they once were

      The numbers suggest otherwise:

      Operating System Market Share
        Top Operating System Share Trend

      Holding 92% of the market after a quarter century or more of competition looks mighty healthy to me.

      Win 7 is approaching a 7% share. OSX has 5% and Linux 1%. Mobile browsing's "explosive" growth still accounts for only 1% of all browsing.

      Top Operating System Share Trend
        Mobile Browsing Explodes in December

       

    6. Re:If MS thinks they're attcking Apple.... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      First of all, Apple has it's own market. The folks who buy their products and are fans are not going to be swayed too much, if at all, by a cheaper price from MS for a similar gadget.

      Tell that to all the iPod and iPhone users who have a Windows desktop/laptop.

  9. Windows tablet edition by Rikiji7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windows tablet pc edition is already in the wild, and nobody cares about it. This is just a poor-marketing-dept reply to apple's itablet/hugeiphone.

    --
    slashwhat?
    1. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      How do you figure? MS has been eluding to getting back into the tablet game for quite a while...

    2. Re:Windows tablet edition by toddles666 · · Score: 1

      I think you may have meant "alluding", but it's funnier the way you wrote it...

    3. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      At the risk of sounding like a grammar Nazi ... How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you can't even SPELL the word you're trying to use? It is "ALLUDE" not "ELUDE" (that would be when one is trying to evade capture).

      Really. Think about it this way: Try your luck getting a job and saying, "I ain't got no ___ .... " (fill in the blank). Do you really think you're going to get hired?

      I sure as hell wouldn't hire you if you made such a basic error. Think about it this way: we have ALL made an agreement that we will communicate in this language called English. If you can't learn the rules, get the fuck out.

      Seriously.

    4. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      At the risk of sounding like a grammar Nazi ... How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you can't even SPELL the word you're trying to use? It is "ALLUDE" not "ELUDE" (that would be when one is trying to evade capture).

      Really. Think about it this way: Try your luck getting a job and saying, "I ain't got no ___ .... " (fill in the blank). Do you really think you're going to get hired?

      I sure as hell wouldn't hire you if you made such a basic error. Think about it this way: we have ALL made an agreement that we will communicate in this language called English. If you can't learn the rules, get the fuck out.

      Seriously.

      At the risk of sounding funny: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/eluding

    5. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I think you may have meant "alluding", but it's funnier the way you wrote it...

      Nope, I meant what I wrote:-) Who says puns aren't funny?

    6. Re:Windows tablet edition by Knara · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called "Windows 7". It has a few adopters.

    7. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Thank you for proving my point.

    8. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I take it you have never heard of a pun? jeebus.

    9. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have.

      When you make one, I'll be sure to take note of it.

    10. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Oh, one other thing. That's probably the most lame website ever.

      If you are interested in reading about the recent redesign of how our desks are set up, you can do so here. Thank you all for your patience, and happy new year!

      Yes, I'm just DYING to know about your desk redesign, I can hardly wait.
      Faaa

    11. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      ::shrug:: Try looking through more than the 15 day period over the holidays when we didn't post anything, you might like it. If not, hey, that's cool...we only get around 50 visitors per day or so, and that is just fine by me.

      My apologies for causing you so much nerd rage. Have a great evening!

    12. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are SUCH a moron.

      #1: Please explain to me how using elude INCORRECTLY is a pun to ALLUDE?
      That is NOT A PUN dumbass.

      #2: You have the most gay website in the universe.

      #3: Look at my user id. It's an order of magnitude lower than yours, so, please, don't try to lecture me.

      Get it?

    13. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Oh, I stand corrected. I'm actually _2_ orders of magnitude more senior than you. So, you see, I will admit I'm wrong when I am.

      Show me how using ELUDE rather than ALLUDE is a pun and I will also admit I'm wrong.

      Oh? You can't? What a pisser.

      Come and get one in the yarbles, that is if you have any yarbles.

      bye

    14. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      #1: In the past, Microsoft has made attempts at marketing tablets, and failed miserably (http://www.pencomputing.com/frames/tablet_pc.html and http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2002/Nov02/11-07tabletlaunch.mspx). Hence, they ELUDED the subject. My humor isn't up to your standards, person I will never meet.

      #2: Sorry you feel that way. We only have a few regulars that check in every day, but like I said that is fine by me.

      #3: Having a user id that is an "order of magnitude" lower than mine means you should be setting the standard instead of lowering it.

      Get it?

    15. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Oh, I stand corrected. I'm actually _2_ orders of magnitude more senior than you. So, you see, I will admit I'm wrong when I am.

      Ah, so you are just grumpy and old? That explains it. Although I think this might explain it better: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19/

      Show me how using ELUDE rather than ALLUDE is a pun and I will also admit I'm wrong.

      Oh? You can't? What a pisser.

      See my above post.

      Come and get one in the yarbles, that is if you have any yarbles.

      Awesome movie. Definitely the highlight of Malcolm McDowell's career.

      bye

      Have a great night!

    16. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      So, according to YOUR definition from freedictionary.org, Microsoft did this:
      "To evade or escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill"

      They did that to a tablet PC?

      Wow.

      Really?

      That is YOUR definition

      Not much of a pun there.

      Which is pretty much what I said in the first place.

      Yes, your sense of humor escapes me. And every other intelligent person on the planet.

    17. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm going to give you a bit of cred for recognizing M. McDowell and that movie. BUT ...

      just admit you used elude incorrectly. Seriously. It wasn't and will never be a pun for allude. It can NOT be a pun, it's just not possible.

    18. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      So, according to YOUR definition from freedictionary.org, Microsoft did this: "To evade or escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill" They did that to a tablet PC? Wow. Really? That is YOUR definition Not much of a pun there. Which is pretty much what I said in the first place. Yes, your sense of humor escapes me. And every other intelligent person on the planet.

      Notice how there are two definitions on that page?

      "2. To escape the understanding or grasp of"

      You do understand the concept of one and two, yes?

    19. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      ::sigh:: Fine, I suppose I'll have to fully spell it out for you.

      Microsoft has ALLUDED to bringing a successful tablet to market in the past, but they ending up completely missing the mark. Hence, they ELUDED the subject.

      Was that really too difficult for you to figure out on your own, Mr. Low User ID?

    20. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Oh, and before you get up my ass again mein Führer, I'm aware that it should have said "the subject eluded them". But having such a low user ID, you must have already known that.

    21. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Jesus

      What a convoluted answer. Did you REALLY convince yourself that you didn't misspell it in the first place and got called out?

      Is your ego REALLY that large?

      Do you REALLY expect me to believe that you intended to say that MS was attempting to "To evade or escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill" a tablet PC in the first place?

      Is that what you really expect anyone to believe?

      You're obviously not incredibly stupid. Don't fool yourself into thinking you're smarter than the rest of us bears.
      (Shh! here's a hint: you're not)

    22. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it's not really a pun then is it?

    23. Re:Windows tablet edition by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Jesus What a convoluted answer. Did you REALLY convince yourself that you didn't misspell it in the first place and got called out? Is your ego REALLY that large?

      Considering you are the one who implied a low user id automatically makes someone better, I don't think you should be talking about egos.

      Do you REALLY expect me to believe that you intended to say that MS was attempting to "To evade or escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill" a tablet PC in the first place? Is that what you really expect anyone to believe?

      No, I expected people to believe they did the second definition listed in that link: 2. To escape the understanding or grasp of. I would have figured someone with such an amazingly low user id such as yours would have known that a word can have more than one definition. After all, you are my "senior", so if I'm aware of this fact...

      You're obviously not incredibly stupid. Don't fool yourself into thinking you're smarter than the rest of us bears. (Shh! here's a hint: you're not)

      I'm quite aware that I'm not smarter than everyone else...but I did find a perfect opportunity to invoke The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory in a friendly flame-war, so overall I would say it was a successful evening. Good night :-)

    24. Re:Windows tablet edition by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I think we should give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt and assume that they aren't going down that road again.

    25. Re:Windows tablet edition by minderaser · · Score: 1

      I gave you a perfect opportunity to admit you're wrong, and you try to invoke the SECOND definition of ELUDE, which STILL doesn't make sense. Christ, I even lowered myself to compliment you.

      You're the Great Internet Fuckwad. Your lame website proves it, but you're so smug you'll never get it.

      Good riddance.

  10. Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is going to be WAY cooler than Windows XP Tablet Edition running on the Compaq Tablet that it was introduced with. Or Vista with built in Tablet Extensions that MS demoed a while back. Yay!!!! Windows 7 Tablet!!! it will be great where the two previous attempted failed miserably because it's new!

    1. Re:Yeah! by ianare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be fair, Windows didn't get usable until version 3.1

    2. Re:Yeah! by dadman · · Score: 1

      Should parent be rated as Score: 5, Funny ??

  11. Ugh, Slashdot is so annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The eDGe looks like two palm pilots glued into an ugly box. That thing got beat with the ugly stick.

    ANYTHING from HP/Microsoft is going to look better than that.

  12. at the conference... by StripedCow · · Score: 5, Funny

    sorry people, you'll all have to stand... we removed all chairs as a precaution

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    1. Re:at the conference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out of my head fine sir.

    2. Re:at the conference... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      You fool! Do you know what happens when Ballmer wants to throw a chair and can't find one? It only increases his rage, and like the Hulk, the angrier he gets the stronger he gets. He'll start picking up people and throwing them through walls. It'll be a disaster!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  13. Enough Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't people just wait until companies actually announce products before writing about how good or bad they might be, or how they might change the market? Now we have this ridiculous scenario where bloggers are writing about a possible product announcement and how it compares to another possible product announcement from another company further down the road.

    1. Re:Enough Already by insufflate10mg · · Score: 1

      It is called "industry/market analysis," would you prefer it didn't exist? Is it even logical for it to not exist?

  14. I don't understand... by magsol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...why Microsoft seems to think it's in competition with Apple. Microsoft built itself on being a software company and has only recently - within the last decade - ventured significantly into the hardware market (Xbox, Zune, now the tablet, etc).

    Apple, meanwhile, has traditionally been the opposite - a hardware company that occasionally ventures into the software industry (arguably the only software they make is variations of OS X for all their hardware devices).

    I am ready and willing to accept naivete as a reason for my above question, but on the off-chance it's not...why does Microsoft care what Apple does? I should think they'd be better off worrying more about what Google does in response to this tablet than Apple.

    --
    "I'd just like to emphasise that taking a million years isn't a metaphor here..." -Rich Bradshaw
    1. Re:I don't understand... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      why does Microsoft care what Apple does?

      Because Apple makes obscene profits selling hardware and software. And they're able to sell commodity hardware at twice the price to the easily impressed. MS wants to do that too.

    2. Re:I don't understand... by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft isn't jealous of Apple's profitability, they are just looking for ways to increase their gross revenues.

      They are currently a nice bit more profitable than Apple:

      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=MSFT
      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=AAPL

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:I don't understand... by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      ... the only software they make is variations of OS X for all their hardware devices

      Um, no... Apple produces a lot of different software products.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    4. Re:I don't understand... by Trailrunner7 · · Score: 1

      How exactly can Microsoft be responding to an event that hasn't taken place yet (the Apple tablet announcement)? Is that "pre-sponding"?

    5. Re:I don't understand... by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      What about things like Final Cut Pro? That's software...

      That said, I don't know if MS really cares what Apple does... except that because you don't typically buy a Mac to run Windows on it.

      But hey. As long as their wrongfully-supposed competition yields some good products, I don't care :)

    6. Re:I don't understand... by Aviation+Pete · · Score: 1

      ...(arguably the only software they make is variations of OS X for all their hardware devices).

      you seem to forget their iApps, Quicktime, Xcode, the productivity apps like Keynote or the many pro apps for things like movie cutting and picture editing. While Apple's objective may be to boost their hardware sales, the software is a huge part of the company.

      iTunes and Quicktime are most likely even running on your PC.

      --
      You know it's time for the next revolution when your rulers' names end with roman numerals.
    7. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't typically buy a Mac to run Windows on it.

      On my MacPro, I've got MacOS X Snow Leopard, and in Virtual boxes: Windows 7 Pro/64, Vista Pro, XP Pro, 2000 and just for laffs, Ubuntu.

      I bought a Dell Inspiron 1525 to create a HackBook with MacOS Leopard.

      I've always had a bit of a contrary streak, I guess.

    8. Re:I don't understand... by insufflate10mg · · Score: 1

      You make valid points, but it is the nature of the game you're ignoring. Microsoft does specialize in software while Apple is more hardware-based, but Microsoft's main product regardless has been most affected by Apple's software. Likewise, Apple's hardware along with their software solutions have always dealt with Microsoft as their main competition. The rivalry is just huge, and any strategically-sound opportunities to directly impact each other are usually taken advantage of.

    9. Re:I don't understand... by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      iTunes and Quicktime are most likely even running on your PC.

      Unfortunately. ;)

    10. Re:I don't understand... by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Apple is arguably the last consumer GPC systems manufacturer. MS provide commodity software for commodity hardware, and has traditionally left integration issue to others. Therefore, Apple has some experience with getting components to work together, while MS only has limited experience on the Software side. I say limited because up to five years ago it did little work to make standards based software.

      What MS did for most of it's life is produce good enough software for a good price. MS products were cheap enough, or could be acquired cheaply enough, so that more expensive systems made no economic sense for many common applications. What MS is doing now is trying to upscale the product. The software now costs more than the hardware, something that to many people seem unreasonable. Like IBM, MS now makes little sense for small groups. Once can buy a 3 macs for $5000, and keep them operating through 2 upgrade cycles for less than $1000, including iWork upgrades. The same three PCs of similar quantity might cost $2500, but each upgrade cycle is going to cost another $1500, assuming you don't buy the crippled OS, and don't upgrade the MS Office applications.

      MS is trying to be the upscale systems manufacturer because that is where the money is. The problem is that if they compete on pice, then they alienate their hardware partners. So they have to compete on quality which means they are competing on product quality. In cell phones they have failed as the Nokia phones are just too good. In console they succeeded because they are better in many ways than the Wii, and the sony stuff is very expensive. In the tablet market we are back in the realm of alienating hardware partners and jeopardizing the MS Windows cash cow, so they are likely to be competing with Apple and Kindle, rather than the more commodity products.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    11. Re:I don't understand... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd wager it's because they've seen the writing on the wall and know that their days as the dominant force in the software market are numbered and their only hope of longterm viability is to diversify. With well-funded, experienced, intelligent, and innovative companies (Google, first and foremost among them) directly attacking Microsoft's core business, it's only a matter of time before one of them succeeds. Microsoft probably wants to make sure their house of cards doesn't completely collapse if/when that happens.

    12. Re:I don't understand... by magsol · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct; forgot about those rather important applications. :)

      --
      "I'd just like to emphasise that taking a million years isn't a metaphor here..." -Rich Bradshaw
    13. Re:I don't understand... by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Legal and paid-for versions of Windows?

    14. Re:I don't understand... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      It's Microsoft's standard operating procedure #1. Pre-announce vapourware before competition releases their product, to try to get consumers to delay their purchase in the hope that Microsoft can actually deliver what they promise. Six months or a year later, they may or may not actually ship, or ship a half-assed, buggy, incomplete [vs the announced features] version, but it'll at least reduce sales the competitor will have.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    15. Re:I don't understand... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      I talked to a MS PM about this once. He made an interesting point that Apple is a competitor on some level but it's much more considered to be a customer. Microsoft's Apple Business Unit is one of a handful of groups that is profitable year after year. So MS has some very good reasons to care what Apple does.

    16. Re:I don't understand... by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has been into much more hardware than that for much longer. Mice, Keyboards etc etc, just not full systems.

    17. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember, Apple's hardware is just a licensing dongle for Apple's software and then everything makes since...

    18. Re:I don't understand... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Apple isn't a hardware or a software company. Do people still not get this? They make complete systems. Both hardware and software are just as important to them.

      They also make plenty of software that isn't the base OS.

    19. Re:I don't understand... by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Why? Because every time a person buys a MacBook instead of a Dell, Microsoft loses $40 in sales, and this is happening more and more often, primarily because Apple has been successful with getting people to go through the iPod->MacBook transition.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    20. Re:I don't understand... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has loads of cash, from Windows and Office.

      They can even pay this back to shareholders, or they can invest in themselves to enter other markets, and get more revenue streams.

      Apple have managed to do this with their ipod and now iPhone range. Microsoft have tried to do it with Xbox, but have not produced a profit yet. They have probably done it with .Net and Visual Studio. They certainly have done it with SQL Server and Windows Server. They failed with the Zune, but that still might pan out for them.

      This is basic stuff, why some people on here can't understand this is beyond me.

  15. What happened to media objectivity? by protosage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The NYT article is ridiculous. Granted Apple will probably release a tablet like device or at least announce it in the next month or so. However how can MS/HP announce a me-too device without there being a device to emulate? What's unfortunate is that as usual the Mac boosters in the media who believe that the Mac is the be all for all users are going to pass judgement on this device by comparing it to the mythical Apple tablet. It's like comparing a good race horse to a unicorn sure that horse is fast, but it's not a magical and can't fly. (Granted Apple may deliver a unicorn, but the point is it just doesn't exist yet however cool it may be)

    1. Re:What happened to media objectivity? by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple will release a horse, but it will have sparkly dust on it and the unicorn they glue to the forehead will be very lifelike and you won't be able to see the glue at all. It will be trained so that a 6 year old can ride it. It will run slower, cost more, and never be seen in an actual race or ridden by a professional jockey, except in marketing literature. But, oh, it will polished.

      That's not to say that MS won't show up with a mule and a paper cone taped to it's forehead with duct tape. They probably will. MS has an amazing ability to fuck things up, or start with a good idea and then abandon it (can you say Media Center or WinMobile?). I think a tablet is more likely to be a limited use device, and MS just sucks wind at such things. That's a shame, too, since I'm not fond of Apple's lack of extensibility on anything they make.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:What happened to media objectivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NYT article is ridiculous. Granted Apple will probably release a tablet like device or at least announce it in the next month or so. However how can MS/HP announce a me-too device without there being a device to emulate?

      What's unfortunate is that as usual the Mac boosters in the media who believe that the Mac is the be all for all users are going to pass judgement on this device by comparing it to the mythical Apple tablet. It's like comparing a good race horse to a unicorn sure that horse is fast, but it's not a magical and can't fly. (Granted Apple may deliver a unicorn, but the point is it just doesn't exist yet however cool it may be)

      Are you saying that Microsoft released the actual product before the vaporware announcement? So typical of Microsoft to put the cart before the horse!

    3. Re:What happened to media objectivity? by dasmoo · · Score: 1

      I think me-too in this case means "just another tablet", whereas apple wouldn't bother making one of these kinda devices. If ballmer gets up on stage and shows just another tablet, and jobs gets on stage and blows everyone away, ballmer will look like a dick.

    4. Re:What happened to media objectivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they keep stopping the race for photo opportunities - because the sparkly dust on the iUnicorn just looks *so* good - who cares which animal's faster?

    5. Re:What happened to media objectivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Apple will release a horse, but it will have sparkly dust on it and the unicorn they glue to the forehead will be very lifelike and you won't be able to see the glue at all. It will be trained so that a 6 year old can ride it. It will run slower, cost more, and never be seen in an actual race or ridden by a professional jockey, except in marketing literature. But, oh, it will polished.

      That's not to say that MS won't show up with a mule and a paper cone taped to it's forehead with duct tape. They probably will. MS has an amazing ability to fuck things up, or start with a good idea and then abandon it (can you say Media Center or WinMobile?). I think a tablet is more likely to be a limited use device, and MS just sucks wind at such things. That's a shame, too, since I'm not fond of Apple's lack of extensibility on anything they make.

      You forgot to mention the Microsoft horse will need a geek to train it properly and even after it's configured right it will at times fall on it's face whether walking, running or even standing still. It will be cheaper but will several times a year require an upgrade suppository the size a watermellon to be applied rectally with a sledge hammer. The horse may buck a bit during upgrades and may not walk properly afterward.

    6. Re:What happened to media objectivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So ... glue a unicorn to the head of a horse and you get what now? What part are you gluing? I could see gluing a unihorn to a horse to make a unicorn, but what you describe sounds NSFW & more than a little freaky ;)

    7. Re:What happened to media objectivity? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      It depends how you look at it.

      Apple are going to release a tablet, there is no argument about that. It could do very well, ala iPhone, or it could crash and burn.

      Microsoft would rather it crashed and burnt. If anyony out there is going to make money on this, MS wants it to be them. This is only natural.

      Microsoft have experience in pre-announcing products before competitors in the past, see the OS/2 wars.

      You judgement is clouded by your Apple Fanboys hate. If it was only for the Apple fanboys, Apple would have died a long time ago. There are a lot of people who buy Apple these days, witht their iPod and iPhone lines.

      It isn't about a product existing, don't you get that now. It was the same before the iPhone but even more so now. An Apple announcement is huge, becuase they have had huge payoffs with iPod/iPhone.

      You are a fucking tool if you don't understand this. Hype is worth a lot.

  16. Software by kehren77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But what about software for it. I think part of the anticipation of the Apple tablet is that it will be a larger iPod Touch with added functionality. If the Apple tablet can run iPhone apps it already has a huge advantage over the Microsoft tablet, more so if it can also run OS X apps.

    What software would the Microsoft tablet run? Windows 7? It will have all the speed of a netbook. Windows Mobile? It will be DOA if it runs Windows Mobile.

    As a side note, how much do you want to bet that Microsoft somehow tries to connect their tablet to Xbox Live?

    1. Re:Software by Rikiji7 · · Score: 1

      i hope apple's tablet will run natively any OSX app, since a huge ipod touch looks just useless.

      --
      slashwhat?
    2. Re:Software by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BINGO

      We have a winner. Not only does the MS pre-announce announcemnt sounds too much like the typical "me too" we get from Microsoft. Not only this, Microsoft has already tried "tablet" (and even tabletop) gadgets, and yet somehow nobody wants or cares about them. XP Tablet version is nasty bad and Windows doesn't work very well in "Tablet Mode" (which also requires a stylus yuck). (Just don't remind me of Newton)

      I actually think that Apple's Tablet will be exactly this, iPod Touch on roids! The biggest drawback on the iPodTouch is the screen size, and having to "switch" applications back n forth to do stuff, but with a larger screen you might have four or six apps in their own section of the screen all at the same time, while also allowing larger screen sizes for other applications.

      But that is just my $.02

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Software by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      iSlate needs to have all the functionality of the iTouch for games, mp3s, and videos, plus function as a good large print eBook reader. The population is aging; baby boomers don't have the eyesight they once had. Sure, it's a niche squeezed between smartphones with smaller displays and notebooks/netbooks without touch screens, but if they can get the price point below $500 they could sell well as a viable eBook reader. Don't most people like to be able to listen to music while they read? The only way to make up for the inconvenience of being harder to lug around is to combine the functionality of every device you may want in a single device -- it beats the heck out of lugging around a separate cell phone, mp3/video player, PDA, GPS, eBook reader and notebook. (Granted, most smart phones already combine the first 4).

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but with a larger screen you might have four or six apps in their own section of the screen all at the same time

      You're the second person I've heard suggest that. What I want to know is, why are people so eager to use Windows 1.0?

    5. Re:Software by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      Why would I want to run iphone apps on a tablet? I lose the portability and gain... blurry upscaled graphics? Apps designed for finger tips on a single hand become a nightmare to use too when the screen is 3-4 times as big.

      Tablets have been tried over and over. If people want the portability, they'll get a netbook or a PDA/smartphone. Tablets are awkward to carry, painful to use for any real work and are mix of both sets of disadvantages from PDAs and Netbooks.

      What can I use a tablet for where a e-book reader, PDA or netbook wouldn't be more appropriate?

      As a side note, how much do you want to bet Apple somehow tries to tie their tablet to itunes?

    6. Re:Software by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and why would I want an iPhone when I could carry around a cell phone, a music player, a PDA, a game boy, and a thousand other little devices.

      The whole point of the iPhone is to replace all of those 1-use devices. The same is true of the Apple tablet, to replace the need to carry an e-book reader, PDA and netbook with one device.

      And how many iPhone apps have their graphics designed in the size that they appear on the iPhone. I'm guessing most companies develop a larger version and scale the artwork down. But that's just a guess. But in all the work I've done, it's always easier to work on a larger version and then scale down for the final product.

    7. Re:Software by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the iPhone is to replace all of those 1-use devices. The same is true of the Apple tablet, to replace the need to carry an e-book reader, PDA and netbook with one device.

      If it's really 10" and almost $1000 as rumored, it won't replace a PDA (way too big) or an e-book reader (too big, too expensive, and the battery life won't be sufficient). And unless it has a hard keyboard (who knows at this point...) I couldn't see it effectively replacing a netbook, either. And even if it does, big deal. Netbooks haven't done much of a job replacing laptops yet, anyway.

    8. Re:Software by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      :::blink:::

      Say hooohaw?

      "If the Apple tablet can run iPhone apps it already has a huge advantage over the Microsoft tablet, more so if it can also run OS X apps."

      Sir, I'm sure you'll find that the number of applications available for windows absolutely DWARFS the number of applications available for iPod/iPhone and OS x COMBINED!

      I mean really, did you stop to think before you wrote that? :::boggle:::

  17. One thing Microsoft doesn't have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called iTunes.

    1. Re:One thing Microsoft doesn't have by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm confused. You can install iTunes on Windows.

    2. Re:One thing Microsoft doesn't have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A GREAT BIG BUSHY BEARD!

    3. Re:One thing Microsoft doesn't have by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they don't control it. And you can bet they won't integrate it to work with Zune. They want compelte control, they want there own version. This has been a huge bonus for Apple.

  18. Tablets are the new "Cloud Computing". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tablets are well on their way to becoming the "Cloud Computing" of 2010.

    We are seeing a huge amount of hype from all of the major players, but we're not getting anything that's truly usable.

    Of course, this isn't the first time that many of these vendors have tried to offer a tablet of some sort. Microsoft alone has failed time and time again.

    Just like with "Cloud Computing", they are taking an ancient a failed idea and trying to push it on the public once more.

    We're not even a week in, and yet we know that tablets will be this year's major tech failure.

    1. Re:Tablets are the new "Cloud Computing". by tibman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've got a Hitachi Visionplate for.. well, practically free. It's several years old though. 512MB CF card with Puppy linux on it. 600mhz proc. Hitachi must have made the visionplates even before netbooks took off. It's like a nice big wireless touchscreen LCD that you can carry around the house. Super cool.. not sure why nobody likes these things. You can find them cheap on ebay sometimes.

      Check it out: http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y104/tibman/VisionPlate/DSCN0921.jpg

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  19. Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by brxndxn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I swear that sometimes the future is stupidly obvious and these big dumb corporations adamantly try to refuse it.. A $1000 tablet may be a temporary success... but the future is cheap 'netbook' tablets like in Star Trek TNG. The point of a tablet PC is to offer a computing platform that removes the need for paper. Paper is cheap. A dual-screen tablet is the stupidest of the stupid moronic stupid things Microsoft would do..

    So right now, while electronics shops cope with el-cheapo lcd screens being placed in every product, why the hell aren't these big dumb companies seeing that the el-cheapo lcd photoframes are just a few steps away from being the tablets we need? To truly remove the need for paper, we do not need speed or the latest in 3d multimedia. We need el-cheapo tablets that can be passed around while the personal information is contained in removable cards (SD? miniSD? microSD? who cares). Let me write on the screen. Convert my text to type. Let me play a video - but not necessarily a video game. Let me browse the net. Let me read an ebook. Let me write up my notes at a meeting and toss them on my boss's desk. Put this with a slow-ass cheap processor, minimum OS (fuck you Microsoft, but still XP is small enough), minimum other parts, and a touch-screen. Also, make it easily replaceable.. If I lose my tablet, lemme buy another for $200. Let the data automatically sync to my desktop computer when I bring the tablet near it. Waterproof the tablet.. should be easy, right? just one rubber compartment around the storage cards and ports.. let it borrow internet access from my nearby cell phone or my wifi..

    The tablet does not need to do the following:
    - charge me a monthly fee of any kind - so it should not have cell phone shit in it
    - play 3d games
    - rival my desktop in performance
    - weigh more than 1.2 lbs
    - be more than 3/8" thick
    - download automatic updates
    - use front surface area for anything other than a screen
    - cost more than $200 ($300 in 2011, $500 in 2012 to account for inflation)

    This is the future of tablet computing that I remember.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      I generally agree with the parent, but:

      The tablet does not need to do the following:
      - download automatic updates

      I actually disagree on this point. It's almost certain that someone will find some sort of security exploit in the networking software in the device, at some point, or in the browser, or mediaplayer, or whatever. I think *any* device which has net access needs an automatic update facility for patching security holes.

      "- cost more than $200 ($300 in 2011, $500 in 2012 to account for inflation)"

      Wow - that's some major inflation you're allowing for there. That's almost 50% inflation year after year. Inflation (in the U.S., at least) has historically been less than 10% most years (see this graph for example). Higher inflation is, I suppose, always a possiblity, but I'm not sure there's much basis to predict that much inflation in the next 3 year? Electronics, anyhow, usually go opposite of inflation of all other product prices. They tend to be cheaper 3 years after release, rather than more expensive.

    2. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      I swear that sometimes the future is stupidly obvious and these big dumb corporations adamantly try to refuse it..

      Or perhaps they're a lot more clever than you realize. Why release the "future" today when you can build up to it, releasing other stuff in the meantime while making a profit all along the way?

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    3. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by nizcolas · · Score: 1

      Sign me up for two of these. In fact, sign me up for one that runs like Ender's desk.

      --
      If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
    4. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by villy · · Score: 1

      I think you've (closely) described the OLPC laptop: http://laptop.org/en/laptop/hardware/specs.shtml.

      With some minor design changes, these guys could probably become a major player in the quickly-heating-up tablet/slate market.

    5. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by Kelz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Half the meaningful web is in flash, ajax, and a bunch of other stuff that doesn't run smoothly on a 400mhz small-profile CPU, especially on XP. A version of 7 should be modular enough to scale with the processing power. PROPER touch-sceens, resistive or capacitive, especially in a high enough resolution to be called a tablet don't come as cheap as you'd like to think, and if the performance is crap it won't catch on. We're just coming to the point where we can stick enough juice into a screen big enough to call it a tablet. Give them SOME credit.

    6. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      200 to 500 in inflation in 2 years? I sure hope not. If you think the current recession is bad that would be great depression bad...

    7. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by gladish · · Score: 1

      What about a hand job, do you want it to do that too?

    8. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by bradt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds to me like what you want is a modern-day Newton priced like the iPod Touch!

    9. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use front surface area for anything other than a screen

      Other than this, I'd agree. I've been after something along the lines of a giant ipod touch for many years now. Technology is gradually getting to the point where it is feasible for a sane price. I don't want a keyboard, because I don't want a laptop replacement. I desire a media consumption device that lets me do things like: cruise the web, read comics, read books, show photos, watch tv and dvd rips etc, maybe handle audio. Screen navigation is all that's needed for this simple functionality, just use a modern smartphone to see how well it works (most of the time). Alas, these phone's are too small for what I have in mind. A screen about the size of a sheet of letter/A4 fold in half would do.

      Other people will have different ideas about how these mythical devices should behave for their needs. Some believe they're laptop replacements, or want to go that way.

      Waterproof would be excellent but it'll never happen.

    10. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I have a strange workflow, but I definitely see a need for multiple displays (Courier-style).

      I'd rather have a slate with two book-style screens than just a plain slate. Far too often I have to view two pieces of information at once, and a one-screen slate would just be frustrating for research. I guess having two slates side by side would also work, but only if they're completely integrated, I want to be able to 'flick' stuff from one to the next with no passwords, file sharing setup, etc. It should be seamless, as if all the slates were just multiple views onto the same workspace.

    11. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by rxan · · Score: 1

      The point of tablet PCs is not to remove the need for paper. You're thinking of electronic readers.

      The point of tablet PCs is to have a form factor that is usable in something other than the standard desktop/laptop arrangements (sitting at a desk, sitting with the laptop on you, laying down with a laptop in front). These settings force us to conform to the computers, when they should be conforming to us.

      The laptop advanced computing by making it mobile, but it also crippled its usability due to tech available at the time of its conception. The tablet would solve a lot of these problems aside from text entry.

    12. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      cost more than $200 ($300 in 2011, $500 in 2012 to account for inflation)

      The pricing should go in the other direction, or at least stay the same...

    13. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but the future is cheap 'netbook' tablets like in Star Trek TNG.

      They only seemed cheap because TNG had one of those fantasy moneyless economies. Somewhere offscreen were legions of young, green slave girls working in the tablet sweatshops on Memory Alpha before they are "promoted" to being sexual escorts for the Starfleet brass and Federation bigwigs.

    14. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by AlizarinCrimson · · Score: 1

      My _portable_ tablet pc would in fact be radically different from yours. Since the only use I have for such a device would be art; as such it would need pressure sensitivity, a pen; have reasonably powerful hardware underneath the hood.

      What you want seems closer to an iPod than anything...

    15. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit Mom, I told you not to embarrass me by talking to my friends on Slashdot!

      Now go make me dinner.

    16. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by joh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I swear that sometimes the future is stupidly obvious and these big dumb corporations adamantly try to refuse it.. A $1000 tablet may be a temporary success... but the future is cheap 'netbook' tablets like in Star Trek TNG. The point of a tablet PC is to offer a computing platform that removes the need for paper. Paper is cheap. A dual-screen tablet is the stupidest of the stupid moronic stupid things Microsoft would do..

      Excuse me, but you don't get it. People don't want a "computing platform". People care a shit for "computing". People want apps and games and music and movies and newspapers and magazines. As long as you have to call it a computer, it will fail. Believe me, people are sick of computers. They love what they can *do* with them and this is not computing. It's the net (and this means: connecting to other people) and content and fun they're after. The best hard- and software is useless without easy and one-tap access to things and people.

      As long as you think hardware and software is important, you're wrong. It's important as air and water, but once they can breath and drink, people don't want better and faster air and water, they want other things. Then they care for the air and water only if it smells and has the wrong color.

      Well, maybe you meant exactly this. Sorry then.

    17. Re:Apple, Microsoft be damned.. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Ha, that is funny. Yes, 7 will be faster than Xp. You do realise you can remove sections from XP as well.

      Pretty sure ajax will run just fine. Flash, maybe not, but Ajax isn't anything special (You know it is just javascript, right).

      I would suggest you hand in your geek card, but I have a feeling you will not know what I am talking about.

  20. Year of the tablet by joerdie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    2009 was the year of the netbook, 2010 will be the year of the tablet. The problem is, tablets are so niche... and the normal consumer doesn't know.

    1. Re:Year of the tablet by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Netbooks sold despite being junk because they were dirt cheap. Tablets aren't going to sell unless they have a price point competitive with a $300 netbook or eBook reader. The $1000 price point being tossed around for the iSlate is silly when one could get a decent Macbook for that much.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Year of the tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Year of the tablet on the desktop, even! Woo!

    3. Re:Year of the tablet by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I think if Tablets went the dockable route (i.e. able to dock to a keyboard/faster hardware, then be taken out as just a touchscreen with decent hardware) they would gain a larger following. For someone like my fiance (a 3rd grade teacher), a computer she can use as a laptop on her desk and then just grab the screen and go while walking around the classroom would be quite an asset.

      yes, I know there are laptops with touchscreens that swivel, but then you are stuck carrying around a laptop, regardless of how small it is. If tablets are to make it anywhere in the near future, they need to be dockable to a full-sized keyboard.

    4. Re:Year of the tablet by theJML · · Score: 1

      They could just have bluetooth in them. Use a bluetooth keyboard/mouse and a nice little angled holder to use it as a screen at your desk, then just pick it up and walk around. Even an oversized plate display holder would work for that!

      --
      -=JML=-
    5. Re:Year of the tablet by joerdie · · Score: 1

      Thats a really good point. If the market can find more uses like that, it shall succeed. I currently have an HP tablet that I really love... but never use in tablet mode.

    6. Re:Year of the tablet by icegreentea · · Score: 1

      There's a new Lenovo just like that! The IdeaPad U1 is more or less like that. It has a Snapdragon and a SSD in the "tablet portion". In laptop mode, it runs whatever you want (presumably selling it with Windows7), and in slate mode it runs a custom Linux.

      linky:
      http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/05/lenovo-ideapad-u1-hybrid-hands-on-and-impressions/

    7. Re:Year of the tablet by Pojut · · Score: 1

      O_O I read engadget, gizmodo, arstechnica, etc. almost every day...not sure how I missed this one. Thank you very much!

    8. Re:Year of the tablet by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      snapdragon is based on arm architecture. Windows 7 will never run on it, they probably ship with windows mobile.

    9. Re:Year of the tablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mp3 players and smartphones were pretty niche too until someone made one that customers wanted. Kind of similar to before smartphones "broke the cusp" and offered everything I wanted in a smartphone (like a decent amount of memory, a real headphone jack, a usable web browser, and a real keyboard- well I caved on that when I got the iphone), tablets have been too heavy, too clunky, too short battery life, and too expensive. About 6 months ago I saw something I would have died to have about 6 years ago- a tablet that would open like a regular laptop, but then swivel around to be a typical tablet form factor so I could use it as an e-reader- I think they call these "convertibles" now. http://store.shopfujitsu.com/fpc/Ecommerce/productoverview.do?type=TB&pgid=Tablets Unfortunately it came too late, as the iphone works pretty well as an e-reader, and if I really want a dedicated e-reader now, I will just pick up a Kindle.

      Personally I am quite skeptical of a tablet from either MS or Apple- unless they managed to do something like putting an OLED or e-ink screen on one at a reasonable cost without losing functionality, I think the time of the tablet has more or less passed.

      BTW- I heard the technology for overlaying an e-ink screen over an LCD was close to becoming a reality last summer, so maybe this will be the big news?

    10. Re:Year of the tablet by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Apple do release a tablet, then tablets will become about as niche as smartphones and MP3 players.

    11. Re:Year of the tablet by icegreentea · · Score: 1

      There's a core2duo (along with all the usual laptop goodness) in the keyboard part. It runs windows in laptop mode. When you pull it out, it switches to Snapdragon/Linux.

    12. Re:Year of the tablet by joerdie · · Score: 1

      Apple will sell a ton of anything at this point. I think the real issue is that tablets fall into the chicken/egg situation. With the iPhone, even non apple people wanted a phone that could do all of that.

    13. Re:Year of the tablet by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Ok? Now that I have read about it...

      That sounds like a really horrible idea to me. I don't want to switch environments and loose access to data between the two parts of the machine.

    14. Re:Year of the tablet by nickyj · · Score: 1

      As someone mentioned in one of the other comments, the Touch Book by Always Innovating is basically that. The keyboard is detachable and contains extra battery power, but the tablet portion is still usable. And it's on the fly dock/undock while working on it.

      http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    15. Re:Year of the tablet by joh · · Score: 1

      2009 was the year of the netbook, 2010 will be the year of the tablet. The problem is, tablets are so niche... and the normal consumer doesn't know.

      This is both witty and silly. If you really think that 2011 people will return to the good old shrunken IBM PC with a fresh coat of paint, you're missing something. The last century was the century of the PC and this will change. Tablets are the future of "computing" at least as far as the consumers are concerned and this means about 90-95% of the population. Tablets are here to stay and this is only the beginning. In ten years people will look at keyboards and think "unbelievable!". There will be still keyboards, of course. Programmers, secretaries and writers will use them. Nobody else, though.

      It won't be the year of the tablet, it will be the first year of the tablet and this will only stop with speech recognition becoming the main method of interaction with machines. At least I hope so. Maybe the fscking future is finally here, it took long enough.

    16. Re:Year of the tablet by mgblst · · Score: 1

      The netbook was niche, until everybody started buying them.

  21. Re: Developers Remix Fix by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Oh right. You gave me the excuse to play the remix again.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXhoU43lNHA

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  22. They can't even make a decent phone by wickerprints · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what makes Microsoft think that they can make a decent tablet?

    Seriously, think about it for a minute. Forget about all the hype, forget about Apple's tablet (which hasn't even been announced). Forget about prototypes and mockups. Look at what we already know for a fact. Look at the state of Windows Mobile. How much attention has Microsoft given it? Now consider what they did to Danger, and the whole Pink debacle spearheaded by Roz Ho. And look at what they're doing with Bing, trying to compete with Google. Finally, what happened with the Tablet PC? Remember those? I ask you in all honesty: do you think that Microsoft is actually capable of launching a touchscreen tablet device that is going to provide an elegant, rich, and relatively bug-free user experience? Do you think that they will put their weight behind a putative MS tablet?

    The problem here is that I have serious reservations about Microsoft's competence as well as their sincerity in developing and supporting such a device. I look at their track record with past initiatives and all I see are half-baked attempts. This rumor, if true, totally reeks of desperation, and I would not go near this one with a ten-foot pole. Such a device would not only have to be freaking amazing, it would have to be available by next month AND it would need to be bug-free, and cheap. In other words, it would have to be perfect now. Not in five years. Otherwise, it'll be a joke.

    1. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      And look at what they're doing with Bing, trying to compete with Google.

      This does not support your thesis. Bing is actually becoming somewhat nice to use, and the Bird's-Eye view is really nice to have. I just use both.

      do you think that Microsoft is actually capable of launching a touchscreen tablet device that is going to provide an elegant, rich, and relatively bug-free user experience?

      Yes. Will they? I dunno. But how about we wait until we know it's buggy before saying it will be buggy? What's the harm in hoping it won't be?

      The problem here is that I have serious reservations about Microsoft's competence as well as their sincerity in developing and supporting such a device.

      On the software side? You must have had some unfortunately bad experiences. I've had fairly good experiences. And it's telling (IMO) that you have already decided you don't want the presumed Microsoft tablet-thing even though you haven't seen it, you don't know if it's amazing, you don't know when it's available, and you don't know how buggy or cheap it is.

      iPhones and Linux (distros) are not bug free, perfect, or amazing either... why is it Microsoft has to be? (the iPhone seems to be pretty cool but does seem to have some major issues, IMO... I have used one and actually would not like one, didn't really like using it)

    2. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Parent is correct, but the argument hinges on whether or not you believe Microsoft will throw it's weight behind the new tablet.

      The fact that they have released a number of bad devices does not mean they are incapable of making a good device. In fact, the "failed experiments" probably give them a much greater insight into what the consumer wants / needs. (That is if they bothered to take note).

      Consider the obligatory car analogy- Ford was considered the worst of the US manufacturers for some times. Before the recession hit, Ford actually learned a lot from their mistakes (people like cars to be reliable and cheap! who knew?) The Ford Focus and Fusion are now reliable and profitable cars. Ford didn't take nearly the hit the other US manufacturers did.

      To play on their previous performance you would think they wouldn't have been able to correct their mistakes. But they did. They realized that the public wouldn't stand for their lack of quality (or percieved lack of quality in some cases) and they set out to correct it.

      I do no know if Microsoft intends to do the same, but I will not say that a tablet from them is a guaranteed failure just because they have failed before. It is equally likely they actually want to make money and have made changes to make a worth while product. Companies sometimes like to do that.

    3. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by Kelz · · Score: 1

      I think you've got the right idea but the wrong reasons. I can't remember the last time MS put out a device with a screen on it. Other than mice and keyboards, their biggest branded hardware peice is the X360, which has a reported 60% failure rate after 2 years. Hopefully they've learned quite a bit about hardware reliability if they don't want this to be percieved as a trend.

    4. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by design1066 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a professional who has used multiple tablet PCs for many years in the engineering and construction fields, most of microsofts OS offerings in this arena are quite easy to use and very functional. No I am not a Microsoft fan boy just stating the facts. As a home linux user what I would like to see is a functioning tabletPC running Linux. All I hear in my linux user group is Linux can do that but I have yet to see it. So from experience I can tell you their tablet PC OS works well. Weather Microslop can actually build decent hardware has yet to be seen. Oh wait, what was that really great piece of hardware they sell?? The Xbox. Microsoft bashing aside they have a decent chance.

    5. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by WARM3CH · · Score: 1

      Finally, what happened with the Tablet PC? Remember those?

      Yes, I do. In fact I'm writing this very comment on my Tablet PC running Windows 7.

    6. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by GeckoAddict · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the last time MS put out a device with a screen on it.

      Does the Zune Count?

    7. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I'm hearing from people who work there, MS is tripping over it's own shoelaces because of a bloated bureaucracy where politics preclude any good ideas from percolating to the top without getting significantly 'managed' on the way.

      When you've got everybody needing to have there say in order to justify their jobs and brag about their cojones, then it's very hard to produce a shippable that's simple and elegant from a small team. You would need a HUGE team in order to have the political muscle to push an idea through, and huge teams have a vicious tendency to be inefficient.

    8. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by It's+the+tripnaut! · · Score: 1

      So what makes Microsoft think that they can make a decent tablet?

      They will probably leverage on the advances that they've gained with multi-touch interfaces courtesy of Microsoft Surface.

    9. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Hey, let's not forget "Plays For Sure" and the Zune.

    10. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm definitely not an apple fanboy, owning no apple products, but you're spot on.
       
      Apple pretty much has the tablet foundation in place with the iPod Touch and iPhone. They have fantastic touch sensitivity, all the software already written, a solid underlying OS, the media codecs, browsers, etc.
       
      How the HELL does MS think they can compete with that? What do they possibly have under wraps which comes within 20% of what Apple already has?
       
      I hear "Apple Tablet", and think, "2.5x the size of the iPhone, stylus, handwriting recognition, yeah, it'd be pretty sweet". I hear "Microsoft Tablet" and think...... OS? Not any I can think of would be good for a tablet. Good touch screen? None that I can think of. Good mobile software? None that I can think of.
       
      If MS is seriously considering competing with Apple on a tablet, the only way I can see it happening is if they buy Palm, pump a ton of money into R&D, keep their hands off, and slap their name on it when it's done. Trying to pump out some original hardware and software on a short time-frame is stupid to begin with. "Not in five years" indeed. Trying to do so in less time than that, as a response to a pretty mature line of handhelds which are already approaching tablet functionality is just plain stupid. They'll get eaten alive.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    11. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're a Linux user and work in the engineering field, chances are you have a different idea of counts as easy to use from most people. Just like how many people thought smartphones were easy to use before the iPhone came along.

    12. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It's a good point, but it's worth keeping in mind that there are plenty of smart people at Microsoft. There just seem to be some really dumb ones that foul things up. The Xbox 360 is a pretty good little machine, assuming you're willing to overlook the loud fans and the RRoD. I played with a recent Zune model about a month ago, and was pleasantly surprised. I'm not giving up my iPhone, but it seemed pretty ok.

      Given the amount of smart people they have and the amount of money they can throw at a problem, I don't think you can write Microsoft off. Even so, I'm hesitant to buy into any Microsoft products-- not because of their supposed inability to produce good products, but because of their history of vendor lock-in. I don't want to buy some kind of Microsoft e-reader today and find in a couple years that, for as long as I want to read those books, I have to stay on the Microsoft upgrade treadmill for all of their related products.

    13. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A few things of note:

      1) Windows 7 supports multi-touch, including pinch-to-zoom and drag-to-scroll. Naturally, this is fully exposed to third-party applications via normal input APIs.

      2) WPF 4 in particular has a rather high-level API for multi-touch.

      So all the basic software building blocks are already in place. For the same reason, I wouldn't expect to see WinMo (or anything WinCE-based) there.

    14. Re:They can't even make a decent phone by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I am not a MS fanboy, I hate the bastards, with good reason. (Programmer since Dos 3.3 days)

      However, they do have great experience in OS, they have experimented with touch computing (that table they put out last year), they have experience with media as well (think Zune).

      They could do this. They probably won't, but they could. It might not be as seemless as Apple, but the new Zune HD is not that bad from all accounts.

      One day Microsoft will get there act together, start acting like on company with a unified division.

  23. Oblig. by comm2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The Tablet takes cutting-edge PC technology and makes it available wherever you want it, which is why I'm already using a Tablet as my everyday computer. It's a PC that is virtually without limits -- and within five years I predict it will be the most popular form of PC sold in America."

    Bill Gates, 2001

    1. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Tablet takes cutting-edge PC technology and makes it available wherever you want it, which is why I'm already using a Tablet as my everyday computer. It's a PC that is virtually without limits -- and within five years I predict it will be the most popular form of PC sold in America."

      Bill Gates, 2001

      He was almost spot-on. That iPhone sure was a hit.

    2. Re:Oblig. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      He was almost spot-on. That iPhone sure was a hit.

      Except for the part where the iPhone is not a PC, and was not released within 5 years of 2001, and is not even the most popular form of electronic device. Yeah, apart from being completely wrong, he was spot-on.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a PC that is virtually without limits

      So did Bill Gates thought that the PC was limited by the use of keyboards? How quaint.

    4. Re:Oblig. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      He's only a little too early because the "touch" of most touch screens still suck. As soon as they can come up with a capacitive touch screen that you can use with a stylus, you'd better believe that tablet sales will soar. That, and they need to extend the battery life, which is partly what eBook readers are trying to do. And if they can bring the price down to around 400 bucks, that's when tablets will really become popular.

      I'll bet the technology is out there too. It's only a matter of patents.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    5. Re:Oblig. by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      The iPhone was in 2007 which was 6 years instead of 5 -- not really that far off.

      I'd also take issue with saying that the iPhone is not a PC. The difference between a 2001 PC and an iPhone other than size and input methods (which also apply to tablets) is mostly academic (aside from the artificial restriction on multitasking).

      But I agree, it's not the most popular form of electronic device (by a longshot, yet). Still, it and similar competing phones have become quite a bit more popular.

    6. Re:Oblig. by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      The internet is a minority thing MSDN is where things will be heading to.

      Bill Gates 1994...

    7. Re:Oblig. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I'd also take issue with saying that the iPhone is not a PC. The difference between a 2001 PC and an iPhone other than size and input methods (which also apply to tablets) is mostly academic

      I don't think it's particularly academic. I'm not saying the iPhone is not a portable computing device. But it's quite different from a PC. I can't see people sitting at their office desk and working all day on an iPhone.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:Oblig. by selven · · Score: 1

      An iPhone is personal, and it's a computer. That makes it, by definition, a PC. Sorry to spoil your marketing-induced ideas of what a "PC" is.

  24. The Zune? Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to Amazon's best seller list the top *17* music players are made by Apple. Numbers 18 & 19 are Sandisks. Then comes another iPod. Zune is the 21st in popularity.

  25. Microsoft Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dead, or close to it.

    Yours In Novosibirsk,
    K. Trout

    1. Re:Microsoft Is by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is dying even for longer than BSD.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  26. What announcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What announcement? MS already has tablets, starting with their release of "Windows XP Tablet PC Edition".

  27. Don't say anything just yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Previous standards of tablets and touch screen devices have either been small (in size or degree of market penetration) or awful devices that never should have been made. These tablets aim to be neither of those, they aim to create a whole new market and class of device. We can't really judge them until we know more about what to expect from the hardware.

    Will Microsoft use a Snapdragon chip, or Intel's new silicon? What would the ramifications of those choices be? What about data storage? RAM? And if they do use Intel processors, will there be a desktop OS, or a port of Windows Mobile? Or a whole new solution? We can only wait and see.

    1. Re:Don't say anything just yet... by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I had a pretty decent convertible laptop from 6 years ago with WinXP tablet. Its not a WACOM, but it works fairly well as long as you don't draw to fast with the stylus and unlike the the WACOM it is easily portable. Unfortunately, like all laptops the battery has lost its power and its cooling system has stopped working.

      Edit: thankfully I previewed this, must have been a Freudian slip. I originally had "cooking" where "cooling" is.

  28. Good by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    With both MS and Apple announcing tablets, maybe ONE of them can tell us exactly who those things are targeted at. In the age of netbooks and smart phones on the low end and real laptops on the high end, I want to know exactly who out there is clamoring to spend $1000 for a half-assed laptop with a glorified touch screen. Maybe there are some artists out there who could really use this screen for drawing or something (and some Mac fans who will buy anything with an Apple logo on it, just cause), but why would any mainstream user want one of these things?

    I don't mean that as a troll. Seriously, is anyone here looking to buy a tablet--and if so why?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Good by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Sure. Notebooks are great, but they can be heavy and they're difficult to use while you're on the move. A netbook is a good idea, but they're difficult to use when you're on the move and really too small to use comfortably on your lap.

      A netbook-type machine in a tablet format with good handwriting/speech/something else + virtual keyboard would eat netbooks for lunch.

      I just printed off two papers to read on the bus home. Why? Because my iPhone is too small to comfortably read a scientific paper on and my notebook is too big. A netbook sized tablet would be just perfect.

      For $1000 it would have to make a good run at replacing my notebook. Depending on what it does, I might be interested in one at that price. The future is the netbook niche though. $250-$300 and netbooks are no more. There isn't really any reason why it should cost more to make a tablet style netbook.

    2. Re:Good by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I want to know exactly who out there is clamoring to spend $1000 for a half-assed laptop with a glorified touch screen

      ME! ME! I want one!

      Well, maybe not at $1000, although if it actually runs OS X and I can use a Wacom pen, then I'm all over it. Reading books. Sketching, drafting, Adobe Illustrator.... I've looked at the Wacom CinQ and the 13" macbook -> tablet mod (?Modbook) and they're close. But I'm sort of waiting for Somebody to Do It Right.

      Now, having said this, it is my firm belief that the iWhatever will run the iPhone OS, won't run the full OS X suite, will be locked down more than I like (although will be jailbroken in 48 hours) and will probably be controlled by my great, fat, greasy fingers (side note: Stock in Windex climbs after Apple tablet announced).

      So I will be terribly disappointed and think Bad Thoughts about Saint Steven for a week.

      Then go out an buy one anyway (although if I have half a brain left, I will wait for rev. B).

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Good by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in doing drawing/photo work on a tablet unless it has pressure sensitivity, like a Wacom tablet. Perhaps something will be available aftermarket for Apple's tablet, but I don't expect it to come with anything other than a capacitive touchscreen -- it certainly won't be shipping with a stylus, let alone anything more advanced. I doubt very much that it will be targeted for artists, although I'm sure some good apps will appear for that. It's main function will be for web browsing and multimedia, because that's what mainstream users will want from a tablet. Perhaps you haven't noticed, but most people don't do much typing when they're just browsing the web, reading things, or watching videos, so losing the keyboard to make a more portable device will make a lot of sense to many people, especially if they've used an iPhone.

    4. Re:Good by robus · · Score: 1

      PCs and laptops are personal - it would be nice to have a "general use" computer for people who want to look stuff up on the web etc. Basically a computer that is open to anyone in the house without fear of losing ones privacy. And to have something freely portable - excellent. I would buy two - one for the living room and one for the family room.

  29. "me too! me too!" shout little Billy & Stevey by peter303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is got to be the longest-running MicroSoft joke: announcing vaporware as soon as a competitor does. Windows is the classic example: announced in 1984 when the Mac graphical interface was delivered. But not an usuable version until 3.1 six years later.

  30. Re:The Zune? Nope. by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keep in mind that Clay Aiken's holiday album sold over one million copies in SIX WEEKS.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merry_Christmas_with_Love

    Popularity doesn't equal quality. You can keep your filthy locked down device. I'll stay with my Zen, thank you very much.

  31. remind me again... 2nd or 3rd time for MS tablet? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    seems like it's the third time for Windows Tablet Edition, or whatever you want to call it this year.

    first bunch of hardware around 2000 for it was heavy, clunky, slow, no battery life, and moderately Newton-like.

    maybe this batch will work. especially if the batteries are user-replaceable, which is Apple's achilles heel. yeah, it's sleeker. but you lose your machine to exchange in two or three years, at 1/2 to 2/3 the price of a new one, for a simple battery.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  32. Apple "leaks" were to steal Balmer's thunder by zarmanto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Huh. I guess we can now see a slightly clearer picture of Apple's motivations for "leaking" a few choice details about their new tablet, weeks in advance of the official announcement: They must have caught wind of Microsoft's own development efforts and of this impending announcement, and they just wanted to make sure everyone understood that Ballmer is really the "me too" parrot, rather than allowing people to develop the mistaken impression that Jobs is the parrot.

    1. Re:Apple "leaks" were to steal Balmer's thunder by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      If I had any mod points, I'd give you an "insightful"

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    2. Re:Apple "leaks" were to steal Balmer's thunder by robus · · Score: 1

      Apple also likes to leak hints about a new product category - they never leak about updates to an existing product - that would dampen sales. Leaking about a new product - that makes people wait instead of purchasing a competing product.

  33. To be a success a tablet should be... by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    ...just like a piece of paper: disposable. It seems that a technology only becomes ubiquitous when it becomes so cheap and common that you're strange if you *don't* have one. Everybody, basically, has a cell phone or access to one. A smart phone, like the iphone or android-anything? Not necessarily, but you can buy an old-fashioned cell phone from vending machines now. Look at the history of "computers", in general, and you see the progression from a few at big companies to grandma posting her kitty pics on Facebook.

    A tablet, whether it be from Apple or Microsoft or whomever, needs to be less about being personal and more about being utilitarian; if I perceive that it's not a big deal if the unit breaks or disappears, and I can just get another one relatively easily, then it's a success in my mind. And what would the tablet have to do to be better than a piece of paper? Play video and audio, do basically everything I expect a computer to do but with a simpler interface. As another poster mentioned, a tablet needs to be like the ones everyone seemed to be carrying and passing around on TNG; completely flexible in functionality, and acceptable if I didn't get it back. Maybe that's where cloud computing comes into its own; since it's all "in the cloud", the fact that my tablet fell into the blender while trying to cook something, doesn't faze me very much as I know I haven't lost any data, can replace the tablet cheaply, and only have to explain to the SO why we're ordering take out (again).

    A smart phone is a bad place to start with a tablet concept; the whole point of a smart phone is that it's *yours*, it has your number, your contacts, and everything it does is a reflection of your personality and your tastes and interests. With the abilities of a smart phone, there's no need for a tablet if it's billed as simply "a bigger smart phone"; this is, I think, the point Jobs was getting at with the question "what would someone do with a tablet but surf the web in the bathroom?" A tablet needs to have its own place that is not served by a laptop or cell phone, and being an electronic piece of paper, with all the ephemeral-ness of said paper, is likely the winner.

  34. really? by Alinabi · · Score: 1

    'one of Steve Ballmer's riskiest trade show moves in years.'

    Riskier than this?

    --
    "You can't allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them." [Condoleezza Rice]
    1. Re:really? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Ballmer is the crazy loudmouth slimy salesman that got lucky. If ti wasn't for MS, he would be on HSN

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. Re:remind me again... 2nd or 3rd time for MS table by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    You're posting on Slashdot and you can't replace the battery in an Apple device? Give me your soldering iron before you hurt yourself.

    This place will sell you a kit for the iPhone including instructions and tools for twenty bucks. If you really can't do it yourself they'll do it for you for another $25.

    The real problem is those damn car manufacturers, making the oil non-user replaceable. You're supposed to get that done every four months!

  36. Re:"me too! me too!" shout little Billy & Stev by InlawBiker · · Score: 1

    They're all doing it. Because they realize all of these devices - tablets, laptops, Android phones, iPhones, Boxie things, are all just different ways to consume the same digial crap, er, Content.

    Just to prove a point, we should all turn off our electric gadgets for a week, go outside and have a snowball fight or something, then come in the house and read a book. A book made of paper.

    Man I must be getting old.

  37. Re:remind me again... 2nd or 3rd time for MS table by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    who the hell makes a car where you can't replace the oil yourself?

  38. Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More and more, Microsoft seems to me like a pack of losers.

  39. Throwing chairs and breaking the "Etch-a-Sketch" by crovira · · Score: 1

    Someone should tell Balmer that he can KILL any technology by getting behind it.

    Like the Zune is a tremendous success, right?

    Like we all bought Vista, right?

    Like MS hasn't been found guilty of anti-trust violation. (He's not sitting in jail because we're all waiting for him to pull a "Ken Lay".)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  40. Re:remind me again... 2nd or 3rd time for MS table by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Changing the oil in a car takes about the same level of skill and investment in tools as it takes to change the battery in an iPhone or iPod.

    Actually, changing the battery in a iPhone requires a screw driver and a knife and can be done at your kitchen table in a few minutes. Changing the oil in a car requires at least a wrench and a pail but probably also a set of tire ramps (a specialized tool) and usually you want to have an oil filter wrench or strap handy (also a specialized tool). Modern car makers also have an irritating tendency to put the oil filter somewhere non-trivial to reach.

    If you want to call an iPhone battery non-user replaceable than the oil in a car is as well.

    If you missed it, my statement about changing the oil in cars was sarcastic. I was going to write something about toilet maintenance, which might have been more obviously sarcastic, but I couldn't quite bring it together.

  41. Is it the Acer Tablet? by A+Guy+From+Ottawa · · Score: 1

    Not sure what MS is announcing tonight, but I got a free Acer Aspire 1420P Convertible Tablet PC when I attended the MS PDC in November and the thing is freaking amazing.

    Some highlights:

    • Runs Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate (VERY smooth)
    • Intel Core2 Duo U2300 processor
    • 2GB of DDR3 1066 MHz memory
    • 11.6" HD 1366 x 768 Swivel multi-touch screen
    • WLAN + WWAN chips
    • Multi-Card reader
    • HDMI output

    Complete spec here.

    --

    using System.Awesome;

    1. Re:Is it the Acer Tablet? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well I just found a half eaten banana on the train. I think I win this round.

  42. blue binged by steverar · · Score: 1

    here's a scenario - in the john surfing naughty sites with bing - tablet blue screens - WAAH !!! OMG !!!! reboot reboot reboot reboot reboot - "you have unused desktop icons" - ah crap, there went that moment

  43. Did you read the numbers you posted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had not realized Apple had caught up that much. Considering the supposed market share of windows, ya I'd be worried if I were Microsoft!

    1. Re:Did you read the numbers you posted? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Tough to say, Apple's momentum certainly looks nicer right now, but they also collect something like 10 times the gross revenues on the sale of a computer (and there is a similar situation in the phone business, but Apple is also winning the market share contest there, at least relative to WinMo).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  44. Re:The Zune? Nope. by jd2112 · · Score: 1

    I've only seen one Zune 'In the wild' (outside of store display cases) so they aren't selling well and the few that have been sold are usually hidden to hide the mark of shame of owning a Zune.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  45. Re:"me too! me too!" shout little Billy & Stev by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    I'm in. Please ship me a cooler full of snowballs. Or just snow, and I'll make'em.

  46. skeptical by jweller13 · · Score: 1

    Tablet computing has been talked about as the next great thing every year for the last 10 years. Yet it has never taken off. Why would apple and microsoft's announcement make any difference?

  47. Re:remind me again... 2nd or 3rd time for MS table by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    Tesla motor company?

  48. Re:The Zune? Nope. by dargaud · · Score: 1

    According to Amazon's best seller list the top *17* music players are made by Apple

    I know it's way late to ask that, but why ?!? I've listened to mp3s since before the Napster area and used mp3 players since the Rio and I don't see anything better about the iPods compared to the competition. Quite the opposite (no card reading ability for instance). So, I repeat, why are they so successful ? I find that the best mp3 player is simply my cell phone (no needless duplication of devices).

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  49. Yay! by chucklebutte · · Score: 0

    Another shitty horrible touchscreen device with no keyboard YAY! Hey you guys coming up with these ideas, here is an idea go fuck yourself! Call me in 10 years when touch screens are a viable technology. Ive been using touch screen devices for years now they all suck, even the shitty terminals in stores at registers cant recognize the proper screen touches and the numerous cell phones from palm to windows to iphone all shit! I just recently went Blackberry and im loving the robust OS the powerful hardware and my precise roll ball! Touch screen devices ARE getting better but they are not at the point that we can all be touchy feely and ditch the keyboard.

  50. Re:The Zune? Nope. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for everyone, but I bought an iPod Touch for all the non- music stuff, like a great mobile browser and about 20 apps I use daily. I already had (and loved) a Sansa running Rockbox, but haven't turned it on since I got the iTouch.

    It'd be silly to judge a laptop solely on its worth as a portable MP3 player. In my opinion, the same holds for iPod Touches and iPhones.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  51. Re:The Zune? Nope. by pHus10n · · Score: 1

    Early on, it was due to the accessories (docks on your office desk, car connections, etc). Now, it's a combination of that and inertia. Also, "everything" is an iPod now in the sense that all tissue is Kleenex.

  52. Hardware, Software -- noone cares for that anymore by joh · · Score: 1

    ...why Microsoft seems to think it's in competition with Apple. Microsoft built itself on being a software company and has only recently - within the last decade - ventured significantly into the hardware market (Xbox, Zune, now the tablet, etc).

    Apple, meanwhile, has traditionally been the opposite - a hardware company that occasionally ventures into the software industry (arguably the only software they make is variations of OS X for all their hardware devices).

    Hardware and software increasingly only matters in so far that you don't notice it and it doesn't get in the way. What's much more important is the ecosystem: How much effort have you to put into your device to get things on it? To buy an app or a game or music or a movie or a book or a magazine? If it requires more than a single tap you've lost. People (and I mean PEOPLE, not geeks) are sick of PCs and license numbers and virus-scanners and a thousand of ways to buy things and to make sure they work. People want a package, with the actual hardware just being the interface to it and the technology as invisible as possible.

    If you need to know what format something is in or what resolution your screen has or on what kind of CPU your device runs, you're a geek and in the minority. People want to have things just work. They want a one-stop shop, which has their CC number and where they can buy some cheap software or a song or whatever by just doing it and never waste a single thought about how it works and what the files are named and where there are.

    Apple has all this. They have worked on it for years, they are known for it and if they can get the publishers onto the wagon (with magazines and books and newspapers) and people can buy the NYT and Vogue and whatever as easy as they can buy an app or a song, both the publishers and the people will LOVE it.

    It's not about the hardware and the software anymore. These are necessary (and may be hard), but they are not enough. Throwing the best hardware and the best OS at the people and nothing more is useless.

    If MS and HP now announce nothing than a tablet with Windows 7 on it and some colorful UI on top, they'll not only have lost, they'll have proved that they don't even understand the problem they're facing. I can't imagine that they're that dumb, so I hope there's more to that.

    And let me add one thing: Free Software and open hardware standards are important, but in the future free content and free standards to exchange content will be more important. If you're a real geek you *might* be wise to give up tinkering with hard- and software and start to tinker with content. And if this means to buy a Mac or an iPhone or an iSlate or whatever, do so and use the time you win by not fighting your devices to write and to create music and other things not being meaningful only to computers and other geeks. If we lose the people, we lose everything.

  53. traditional question by HollyMolly-1122 · · Score: 0

    Can LINUX be installed on this platform ?

  54. who cares? by pydev · · Score: 1

    This is like the fourth or fifth attempt by Microsoft to create a tablet, and they all sucked badly. This isn't going to be any different; Microsoft seems incapable of doing anything other than a desktop OS.

  55. Re:The Zune? Nope. by grapeape · · Score: 1

    Same here, im completely hooked on the apps, I was a loyal pocket PC fan but was abandoned by Dell when they exited the pda market and didnt like the direction of the Ipaq. I have since found the Touch to be the PDA i always wanted...at least so far, no its not perfect, I would still like to at least have the option of a sylus but other than that it does more than I really dreamed about before.

  56. Obligatory Cmdr. Taco update by xactuary · · Score: 0

    "Wireless. More space than a nomad. Still lame."

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  57. Clearly by geekoid · · Score: 1

    MS is going to announce that they are providing the OS for Apples new tablet~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  58. Fascinating, how you twist history by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    You mention the PS3 vs 360 vs Wii competition... but this is the FIRST generation tablet for MS. So it should be compared to the PS2 vs X-box vs Gamecube competition.

    MS never makes a good first product. Go ahead, try Windows 1. The original Zune. IE1. Their first office suit. Silverlight 1.0. The list is endless.

    Oh and the X-box cost MS money. History, learn it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  59. Re:The Zune? Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of those 17 are different colors of the Nano, which is at a completely different price point. The Zune HD sells less units than the iTouch, granted, but Amazon won't say by how much. Personnaly, I find the Zune Pass to be a terrific subscription model, and I think that iPod owners really miss out on that.

  60. eink display or go home by johncandale · · Score: 1

    If it's what the rumored Courier was I would not buy it, but it would be neat looking. If you are going to do the duel screens, make one a Eink, so I can read without eyestrain, and justify the price because I'm getting a ebook reader too. I really don't want to carry a laptop/netbook and a ebook reader, but both in one? Now I'm interested. 2 LED screens at first seems useful, but you later realize it's not. Battery life, extra size and weight, etc. Hell, a decent UI can do a lot with one half size screen (iphone). If you are going to do the 2 screens the device better be slick small. Like A DSlite. Fit's in my jeans or a purse.

  61. It depends... by dadman · · Score: 1

    if the Courier weight the same or less than a hardcover book, then it would be okay, otherwise, it is just another touch screen notebook.
    Oh, and I hope MS won't repeat their mistake in WinCE by assuming the same user interface on Win7 would also do fine for a tablet, it won't.

    Hmmm...you seem pretty firm that the iTablet is real, and is a traditional tablet, making the Courier an immediate choice over them ... I, for one, would be interested to know more about Apple's plan, care to shed some light here?

  62. So what ? by dadman · · Score: 1

    You have very good points about MS's capability to turn up a nice and good tablet, but at the end, all these won't matter, as we are still going to use it because this is the only tablet the corporate recognize as a compatible device, and you are still going to pay for all those bug fixes...

    Reality is cruel and hard.

  63. You are saying what....? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    "MS has an amazing ability to fuck things up"

    and previously you said

    "That's not to say that MS won't show up with a mule and a paper cone taped to it's forehead with duct tape"

    Should I call the RSPCA or PETA?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  64. Let me get on the record today by symbolset · · Score: 1

    I know, it's not relevant to your comment. I've got to put it somewhere.

    The tablet that Steve Ballmer announced in partnership with HP in his CES keynote speech will never see the light of day. It is vaporware. It does not exist. Steve-o panicked and held up a half-working concept prototype because he's scared spitless about both the Android tablets working on display at CES and Apple's announcement later this month.

    There is no such thing and there will never be. It sucks so much power you need a 3 pound power brick to work it at all. It sucks juice like a diabetic 300LB hummingbird. If it was impressive he would have showed you how it worked. Microsoft is looking around for an answer to Android on Snapdragon and to be blunt, they're still going to be looking at Christmas time when you're putting those cool new Android tablets/music players/movie players/Kidsafe GPS locators/notepad computers under the tree for your kids, your spouse and yourself.

    In 2010 Microsoft's innovations are going to be limited to paying people to force you to use Bing instead of allowing you to Google what you want. That's all. And in fact TFA announces just that.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Let me get on the record today by Foredecker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dearest Symbolset :) don't make stuff up. You just made that up.

      --
      Jibe!
    2. Re:Let me get on the record today by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If it's delivered by a retail vendor before Christmas, I'll buy you a beer.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Let me get on the record today by Foredecker · · Score: 1

      Deal!

      --
      Jibe!
  65. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by minderaser · · Score: 1

    I actually took a moment to look at your site. For a while I thought I was having an argument with a 15 year old boy (yea, I know, bad reflection on me) because that's the amount of intellect and maturity you display. But NOOOO, you're an adult.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    You're such a loser.

    (If your girlfriend asks you if she looks fat in those jeans, the answer if YES! hahahaahahahahah)

  66. Re:The Zune? Nope. by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

    I know it's way late to ask that, but why ?!? I've listened to mp3s since before the Napster area and used mp3 players since the Rio and I don't see anything better about the iPods compared to the competition. Quite the opposite (no card reading ability for instance). So, I repeat, why are they so successful ? I find that the best mp3 player is simply my cell phone (no needless duplication of devices). --

    Simple.. Known quantity and availability. Ignore any fanboy input, where the only requirement is to have an Apple logo to be the best ever anything..And you can get to the real issue. iProducts are the midi systems of the PMP world. Realistically, go into any consumer electronics chain and you have a pretty pitiful range of choices. iProducts and a few cheap models, a couple of big brand names with disappointing spec perhaps, but that is about it. And that is where it ends for most. The good stuff is really only available in online outlets. Which is possibly why many of the really cool far eastern PMPs never get outside Asia.

    --
    It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  67. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by Pojut · · Score: 1

    Ah, I see. You're from Jersey. That explains quite a lot.

    Have fun living in a hell hole!

  68. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by minderaser · · Score: 1

    Ah, I see. You're from Jersey. That explains quite a lot.

    You're just as wrong about that as you are everything else.

    Have fun living in a hell hole!

    Have fun fucking that fat girl.

  69. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by Pojut · · Score: 1

    You're just as wrong about that as you are everything else.

    Really? So you aren't on Comcast, running Linux at 1280x1024 resolution, or using ::giggle:: Firefox 3.0.1? I see you decided to come back again this morning...you should read some articles about movies on the main site instead of just the blogs... the blogs (man I hate that word) are more like a crappy online journal, whereas the main site are short reviews we put together for fun.

    Have fun fucking that fat girl.

    Oh trust me, I do...she is quite good to me, and very comfortable with herself ;-)

  70. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by minderaser · · Score: 1

    ALMOST everything you just said is wrong. Yea, you got Linux right, that's it.

    You think you're so fucking clever, but you're not. Far from it. You're a fucking moron with a fat girlfriend and a lame ass juvenile website.

  71. Re:The Zune? Nope. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    I looked awfully hard at getting an ipod touch instead of a netbook for my month long trip in south america. I ended up going with the netbook, but I looked over my options between the two devices long and hard before ending up going with the netbook. I'm sort of glad I got the netbook, I ran into some kiwis (new zealanders) who had ipod touches and one had a bricked touch, and the other had his bricked earlier in the trip. A bricked internet device is no fun when you're using it to book hostels in the next city on your trip. Had the touch included some sort of slide out physical keyboard, I might have just overlooked the bricking problem and bought one anyways.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  72. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by Pojut · · Score: 1

    ALMOST everything you just said is wrong. Yea, you got Linux right, that's it.

    Stat trackers and IP logs don't lie...but that's ok, it really doesn't matter.

    You think you're so fucking clever, but you're not. Far from it.

    Pfft, I KNOW I'm not clever. If I was, I would have a more popular website :P

    You're a fucking moron with a fat girlfriend and a lame ass juvenile website.

    That may be true, but I'm a HAPPY fucking moron with a fat girlfriend and a lame ass juvenile website. My life is spent reading comics, playing video games/tabletop games, watching movies, and writing up articles for fun...all with the woman I love.

    What could a lame nerdy 20-something want more than that?

  73. Re: Developers Remix Fix by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

    Dude that was awesome. Surprised I haven't seen that before *grins* - thanks.

    --
    Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  74. Re:The Zune? Nope. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    How do you brick an iPod when you're on the road and away from firmware updates, short of physically breaking it?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  75. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by minderaser · · Score: 1

    ALMOST everything you just said is wrong. Yea, you got Linux right, that's it.

    Stat trackers and IP logs don't lie...but that's ok, it really doesn't matter.

    There was once a time that I actually thought that I could tell someone's location by their IP address. Then I realized what a dunce I was. Don't you think it's about time you woke up too?

    And what's REALLY REALLY fucking creepy is that you're STALKING me. That is utterly lame, gross and pathetic.

  76. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by Pojut · · Score: 1

    There was once a time that I actually thought that I could tell someone's location by their IP address. Then I realized what a dunce I was. Don't you think it's about time you woke up too?

    http://www.statcounter.com/ Invaluable resource for tracking stats for websites. Since there is an official Wordpress plugin, setting it up for me was super simple and fast...been using it since the day we went live. Very useful for determining what people enjoy looking at on our site and what they ignore.

    And what's REALLY REALLY fucking creepy is that you're STALKING me.

    See my above response.

    That is utterly lame, gross and pathetic.

    And yet here you are, continuing to talk to me.

  77. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by minderaser · · Score: 1

    There was once a time that I actually thought that I could tell someone's location by their IP address. Then I realized what a dunce I was. Don't you think it's about time you woke up too?

    http://www.statcounter.com/ Invaluable resource for tracking stats for websites. Since there is an official Wordpress plugin, setting it up for me was super simple and fast...been using it since the day we went live. Very useful for determining what people enjoy looking at on our site

    I have to tell you I'm SO glad you think you've outsmarted me. I think that's just great. Let me tell you a simple analogy about what's happening here:

    You can tell (from my user ID if nothing else) that I'm not a young man. As a matter of fact, I'm an aging white man. And I REGULARLY play basketball with young black guys. Yea, they look at me and think, "Oh, old fucking white guy. I'll destroy him."

    Take a WILD guess what actually happens 9 times out of 10. I kick their ass. So, you thinking you're all clever and know where I'm located (you don't) gratifies me to no small degree.

    Yea, keep thinking you're smart, and that the site you use is actually giving you correct info. I'll just keep sitting back and laughing at you.

    Oh, you should try basketball, or some form of exercise sometime. At the very least, get your fat girlfriend to get off the couch and do more than fetch you ice cream.

  78. Re:Windows tablet edition hahahahaahahahaHAHAHAHA by Pojut · · Score: 1

    I have to tell you I'm SO glad you think you've outsmarted me. I think that's just great. Let me tell you a simple analogy about what's happening here:

    Well...I wasn't trying to outsmart you, but rather bring you back down to reality so we could have a civil conversation. But go ahead, I'm listening.

    You can tell (from my user ID if nothing else) that I'm not a young man. As a matter of fact, I'm an aging white man. And I REGULARLY play basketball with young black guys. Yea, they look at me and think, "Oh, old fucking white guy. I'll destroy him." Take a WILD guess what actually happens 9 times out of 10. I kick their ass.

    So... I was right about the old and grumpy part then?

    So, you thinking you're all clever and know where I'm located (you don't) gratifies me to no small degree.

    You were already so worked up, it looked like a fun idea to get you even more pissed (which, let's be honest, worked pretty well.)

    Yea, keep thinking you're smart, and that the site you use is actually giving you correct info. I'll just keep sitting back and laughing at you.

    Correct info or not, if nothing else it tells me how many people come to the site and what they click on. Even if everything else is wrong, those two parts are the most important anyways. I'm glad you are taking time out of your busy basketball schedule to think about little ol' me though.

    Oh, you should try basketball, or some form of exercise sometime.

    I wish I could still play basketball, or any type of exercise for that matter. At the age of 25, I have vertabrae fusion (L3-L4), a messed up left knee, a rotater cuff injury, never-fully-healed navicular fractures in both wrists, and countless other aches and pains. Considering I don't take any pain meds (not even aspirin), it's a wonder I can still move. I can still get on a recumbent bike a little bit each day, but that's about it.

    Hiking accidents can cause a ton of problems.

    At the very least, get your fat girlfriend to get off the couch and do more than fetch you ice cream.

    Considering she works 80 or so hours a week (the life of a teacher is a busy one), my dairy product needs aren't really her concern. I'm quite capable of getting it myself.

  79. Re:"me too! me too!" shout little Billy & Stev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0