Slashdot Mirror
US Coast Guard Intends To Kill LORAN-C
adaviel writes "LORAN (Long Range Aids to Navigation) is an electronic navigation system using low-frequency radio, used by many boaters (including me) before GPS. It has an approximately 200m accuracy and is a functional replacement in case GPS fails or the US implements selective availability in time of war. The US Coast Guard, part of the Department of Homeland Security, intends to turn it off starting February 8." This is in spite of $160M spent on modernizing LORAN stations over the past 10 years.
and I speak for the Cs -I mean Seas
-I'm just sayin'
What's Loran-C some strange C dialect? Did Loran-C++ eat its lunch or something.
LORAN (Long Range Aids to Navigation) is an electronic navigation system using low-frequency radio, used by many boaters (including me) before GPS. It has an approximately 200m accuracy and is a functional replacement in case GPS fails or the US implements selective availability in time of war.
Wait -- they're talking about decommissioning a redundant technology and relying on one that the military spends millions on and is mission-critical to its functioning (and thus in no danger of suddenly going offline)? Why is this sudden outbreak of common sense being maligned? I wish our government did this more often!
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
Comment removed based on user account deletion
What a complimentary system sounds like: "My, what a nice position. That lat/long looks so good on you."
Of course, such a system would only be useful as a complement.
The Coast Guard is going to "kill" LORAN? This choice of words worries me. What if LORAN decides to strike first, out of self-defense?
"LORAN", "SKYNET", both are short words with an 'N' in them. COINCIDENCE? I think not!
steveha
lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
Sailors, I guess.
As trollish as your post is, I would wager that it is more than a little likely that LORAN is being turned off precisely because it is a beacon based system that selective availability cannot be implemented over. There is no way that LORAN could be used to provide positioning data to select parties.
Personally, I don't think this is a safe thing to do. Maritime equipment is notorious for being long lived. I would highly doubt that there are no boats that are still dependent on legacy systems. Well, I guess this is one way to ensure that they upgrade.
Feb 8:
First Officer: Captain! We've lost navigational systems!
Captain: Damn! That can mean only one thing. Arm photon torpedoes!
First Officer: Err.... we're a 32 year old fishing trawler and we don't have any...
Captain: Quiet! There's no time! Transfer engineering to the bridge and make sure we've got warp if we need it.
I hate printers.
Glonass cannot truly be considered a viable backup for GPS since both are space based and subject to space based attacks from aliens, or from changing laws of physics, or from massive asteroid attacks.
Your post is a trawl.
I have something in common with Stephen Hawking...
Your friend wasn't the navigator on the USS San Francisco by any chance, was he? ;)
I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
Ah, yes -- but Loran-C stations are no doubt being phased out due to their comparative vulnerability to raptor attacks. Just ask Randall Munroe!
Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
1 nanometer?
Holy crumbling pears Batman, that's accurate!