Slashdot Mirror


The FBI's Newest Tool — Google Images

lee317 writes "The FBI recently used a photograph of Spanish politician Gaspar Llamazares as an example of what Osama Bin Laden might look like today. According to Reuters, Special Agent Jason Pack said a forensic artist had been unable to find suitable features from the FBI's database of photographs and used a picture from the Internet instead. That photo turned out to be one of Llamazares, who apparently looks strikingly similar to what the FBI thinks Bin Laden would look like with a few extra years on him. 'I am stupefied the FBI has used my photo — but it could have been anyone's — to compose a picture of a terrorist. It affects my honor, my own image and also the security of all us,' Llamazares said."

220 comments

  1. Terrorists!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We should constantly live in fear of tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times. It's the new American way.

    1. Re:Terrorists!!! by DJ+Particle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We should constantly live in fear of dead tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times. It's the new American way.

      Corrected for you. :) Even Fox reported his death in 12/2001

    2. Re:Terrorists!!! by QuoteMstr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because we've always been at war with Eurasia?

    3. Re:Terrorists!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you saying, comrade? Haven't you been keeping up with the google issues? We've always been at war with EastAsia!

    4. Re:Terrorists!!! by DougF · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hate to break the news, but for us married guys, what's in our pants has no freedom anymore...

      --
      Impetuous! Homeric!
    5. Re:Terrorists!!! by daseinw · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's like we're living in "1984" and news just gets erased from the collective mind.

      This whole article is odd in light of the fact that I'm pretty sure the FBI knows that bin Laden is dead. I mean the man was once releasing more videos each week than Tupac until he started toting that kidney dialysis machine through the mountains. Then... nothing.

      After all, the FBI's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, also http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stmadmitted to believing that bin laden was dead eight (8) years ago.
      Wait... and didn't Afghanistan's current president, Hamid Karzai, http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/admit to believing the same thing 8 years ago?
      Wait... and didn't Israeli Intelligence also http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me_terrorism_10_16.htmladmit the same thing 8 years ago?

      But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.

    6. Re:Terrorists!!! by westlake · · Score: 4, Informative

      We should constantly live in fear of tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times.

      Osama isn't tribal.

      He's medieval.

      His family made its fortune in heavy construction for the Saudi royal family. Net worth $7 billion.

      Chicken feed. Prince Alwaleed alone is worth $18 billion. No Saudi whatever his merit or ambition can climb higher so long as his family rules.

      Do I have to tell you how this story ends?

      Neither is it psychologically insignificant that building the iconic mosque or royal palace was where the bin Ladens began.

      Osama has spent his entire life on the outside looking in.

      Close but no cigar.

      Rich List 2009 - 7# The Bin Laden Family

    7. Re:Terrorists!!! by Bartles · · Score: 1

      My sarcasm meter isn't sensitive enough. Are you serious about this post, or is it tongue slightly in cheek?

    8. Re:Terrorists!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who said anything about Osama?

    9. Re:Terrorists!!! by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After all, the FBI's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, also http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stmadmitted to believing that bin laden was dead eight (8) years ago.


      "Is (Bin Laden) alive or is he dead?" Mr Watson said. "I am not really sure of the answer... I personally think he is probably not with us anymore but I have no evidence to support that."

      Wait... and didn't Afghanistan's current president, Hamid Karzai, http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/admit to believing the same thing 8 years ago?


      "I would come to believe that [bin Laden] probably is dead," Karzai said on CNN's "Late Edition" on Sunday.

      "But still, you never know. He might be alive. Five months ago, six months ago, I was thinking that he was alive.

      Wait... and didn't Israeli Intelligence also http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me_terrorism_10_16.htmladmit the same thing 8 years ago?


      The Israeli sources said Israel and the United States assess that Bin Laden probably died in the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan in December. They said the emergence of new messages by Bin Laden are probably fabrications, Middle East Newsline reported.

      Oh, yes. The damning evidence is just piling up.

    10. Re:Terrorists!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the FBI knows that bin Laden is dead. I mean the man was once releasing more videos each week than Tupac until he started toting that kidney dialysis machine through the mountains. Then... nothing.

      Maybe a few too many near misses made him decide shutting the fuck up was the thing to do. Especially if the next try would not miss at all since they're probably intending to use Tomahawks with nuclear warheads.

    11. Re:Terrorists!!! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      C'mon, man. Osama bin Laden is like... oh, Santa Claus. He's the guy who keeps on giving!

      We've killed his #2, what, 10 times by now? Granted, they were different #2s, and were probably the #1 of some Taliban group not OBL's #2, but yeah, it's been a couple times by now.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    12. Re:Terrorists!!! by Corbets · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.

      If the FBI has reason to believe he's dead and is still "keeping the myth alive", I'd guess the reason is much simpler. They're covering their own collective asses - if it turns out that he's not dead, and he pops up again, someone's going to get fired, at best. So it's better to keep going through the motions.

      So many people here forget basic human nature when it comes to large organizations.

    13. Re:Terrorists!!! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      More to the point, lets see what evidence there is that the individual is still alive and not blurry videos of, well, people who just look similar. Past patterns of behaviour would indicate the leaders amongst the various terrorist factions have quite the ego and once they have developed a taste for being on camera, they do not stop. Of course you could say it is difficult to smuggle a video camera to the location of the terrorist leaders but then, well, what kind of threat would they be, can't smuggle a camera then you can't smuggle explosives, fire arms, ammo or even, oh no, Weapons of Mass Destruction or is that Deception, hard to keep track of all the abbreviations.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re:Terrorists!!! by hanabal · · Score: 3, Funny

      see now, imagine the extra work old Winston will have to do because of new technology. When the war swaps over, will he have to go and change all the posts like the one above on all the forums. that would take a while

    15. Re:Terrorists!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he is alive. He now lives in Spain under the name Llamazares which is an acronym of Osama Bin Laden Lives!

    16. Re:Terrorists!!! by jonbryce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. We are at war with Eastasia. Do keep up. Eurasia (Russia) are our allies.

    17. Re:Terrorists!!! by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I started having the same thought a couple of years ago; "bin Laden" supposedly released a "new" tape, except the tape's segments consisted either of old video of OBL talking, or new video of him "talking," except the video image froze while the new audio was playing. This happened a couple of times.

      It's been years since there's been any verifiably new video of OBL, and as you say, the guy was putting out videos pretty regularly, then suddenly he stops for several years? Riiiight.

      Dude died of kidney failure years ago.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    18. Re:Terrorists!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he's dead now. Did you hear? Today on CNN, I heard it ust as I was coming out. He was in Pakistan and something happened. That's all I caught. He was on a horse in Pakistan, something hit him or something. No, he's all right! I think he's got a cold, that's what they said. No, a tan, that's it.

    19. Re:Terrorists!!! by Lillebo · · Score: 1

      But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.

      So what if Osama bin Laden is dead? It's not as if the global terrorist networks are gonna suddenly collapse if he up and died.

    20. Re:Terrorists!!! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To the idiots who modded this flamebait, ask yourself this: How long do you think a 6 foot, 4 inches tall man, needing serious regular medical care, whilst on the run in the mountains of Pakistan, will survive?

      That's right kids, he's dead. The US has been fighting a fucking ghost.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    21. Re:Terrorists!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eurasia has always been our ally. *blinks*

    22. Re:Terrorists!!! by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Past patterns of behaviour would indicate the leaders amongst the various terrorist factions have quite the ego and once they have developed a taste for being on camera, they do not stop.

      It strikes me as being an issue of trade craft. It is possible that each new recording provides more information than is intended. Add a bit of additional paranoia and you have a pretty strong motivation to resist the lure of being in front of the camera (or even microphone).

      What we have is no strong evidence one way or another. Note that all those quotes use the world "probably." It's all guess work. There might be some really good indications one way or another that may lead one to more strongly favor one conclusion or the other. But without that solid proof, it's still an educated guess at best. And none of that is the damning proof that some like to portray it as.

    23. Re:Terrorists!!! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      On the, he is long since dead side, it hasn't been days, week or even months, but years since the last validated appearance, when will it finally stop, decades or even centuries into the future. Next time they want to create a terrorist master mind bogey man (straight out of your typical Hollywood movie script,hmm, the whole yarn really does stink of it), I suggest creating a CGI character, their impossible to kill and they are available for multiple simultaneous appearances and they wont get sick and die.

      Fear and profits, what a disgusting combination, drive the fear so that more expensive security systems can be sold, so that more security and intelligence contractors can be hired, so that the military industrial complex can prosper, so that worthless preaching politicians can get elected, all in all so that corporate and lobbyist corruption can continue to profit regardless of the cost.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    24. Re:Terrorists!!! by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      On the, he is long since dead side, it hasn't been days, week or even months, but years since the last validated appearance...

      How appropriate that you mention Hollywood. There are numerous celebrities who got a lot of attention in their day who have since gone for years without mainstream attention. Granted, if the FBI wished to track them down, they probably aren't hard to find. But a lack of face time is not proof of death. Rant all you want about boogey men and military industrial complex conspiracies. It doesn't change the fact that there is no proof of life or death (at least, none that is publicly available).

  2. But, Señor Llamazares is a Commie by davebarnes · · Score: 1, Funny
    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    1. Re:But, Señor Llamazares is a Commie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...Thats the real reason they used his photo. The FBI has been very openly anti-communist, and hes a popular politician. Whats the best way to get rid of an opposing politician? Call him Osama bin Laden.

    2. Re:But, Señor Llamazares is a Commie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you just made godwin cry...

    3. Re:But, Señor Llamazares is a Commie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Thats the real reason they used his photo. The FBI has been very openly anti-communist, and hes a popular politician. Whats the best way to get rid of an opposing politician? Call him Obama bin Laden.

      There, corrected it for you.

  3. Blame google not FBI by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    Come on, the FBI agent simply went to images.google.com and entered "osama bin laden now" and hit "I am feeling lucky". How could he know that he should not have been feeling lucky that day? Blame google, not the agent.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Blame google not FBI by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny
    2. Re:Blame google not FBI by MartinSchou · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, the irony in that statement is that now the top link for osama bin laden now HAS a picture of the Spanish politician.

    3. Re:Blame google not FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's the copyright angle on this story?

  4. Fashion by zuzuzzzip · · Score: 1

    Yeah right, Osama wearing a turtleneck; Where are his nice white robes?

    1. Re:Fashion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's why he's actually wearing a turtleneck. He also shaved his bear and cut his. Nobody recognized him.
      http://switchtomac.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Jobs-Osama.jpg

    2. Re:Fashion by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      And he hasn't been near Pakistan for years....

    3. Re:Fashion by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a feeling that he's in the US, probably even working in DC, laughing at how he has managed to be free for years. He probably is working at a StarBucks by the White House. It sure beats the hell out of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region, and no one would suspect it.

      --
      SSC
    4. Re:Fashion by radtea · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling that he's in the US

      I actually saw a guy three or four years ago in a rest stop somewhere near Albany NY who looked amazingly like Osama, dressed in long robe and turban and everything. He was washing his sandalled feet in the bathroom sink.

      Admittedly I suck at facial recognition, and in my memory he is quite a bit younger, but the resemblance was sufficiently uncanny to make me wonder sometimes if your speculation isn't actually on the mark...

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:Fashion by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      It actually was meant as a joke, and was modded such for a time, but then someone thought it was interesting, and there we are. It does make you wonder, though.

      --
      SSC
  5. So what did they search for? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    My question is, what did they search for to get this result? And shouldn't they have checked who it was before they used it?

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:So what did they search for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it really matter whos picture they used?

    2. Re:So what did they search for? by sznupi · · Score: 0, Troll

      "filthy commie"

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:So what did they search for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Google images search for "Izquierda Unida", the leftist Spanish coalition, has him as the first non-logo result, and what I believe to be the actual picture used on the fifth...
      Did the IU annoy the FBI lately?
      Is this a plot to bring them down?

      I'm not sayin' anything, just askin' questions, like...

  6. Indeed by copponex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But, Señor Llamazares is a Commie

    Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding. In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.

    Stateside, I bet many people would consider calling the police. But such is the state of our populace: hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security.

    1. Re:Indeed by aurispector · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Our populace has many kinds of idiots, including those that think the only reason communism has failed everywhere it's been tried is because the right people weren't in charge.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    2. Re:Indeed by sznupi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where it has been tried except in tribal communities and modern days communes?

      Surely you weren't tricked by the claims of oligarchies that called themselves communist? (not that it can work on the scale of a country...)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Indeed by Nikkos · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Where it has been tried except in tribal communities and modern days communes?" Well, if it didn't work in either of theses cases, nor in any more modern country, where exactly is it supposed to work - if at all? Please show me a society in which no participant has any desire for power, money, or both. Capitalism isn't great, but Communism has only served those who've used it to gain power and money.

    4. Re:Indeed by Tynin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Please show me a society in which no participant has any desire for power, money, or both. Capitalism isn't great, but Communism has only served those who've used it to gain power and money.

      There are many small communities based off the idea of communism, and they seem to be working well enough. Here is a larger community that seems to pull off the idea pretty well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Family My sister in law was involved with the Rainbow Family for many years and generally lived a simple life of working and providing for each other in the community. Not everything thinks of only money and power at the end of the day, just most people it seems.

    5. Re:Indeed by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The same can be said for capitalism. Indeed, all economic systems inherently favor those who exploit flaws in the system to gain power and money or goods. Even the barter system. Short of having so much abundance that everyone's needs are fully met, there will always be people who are willing to abuse the system for personal gain. It's not even clear that this would go away even with such abundance.

      Power attracts the corrupt and the corruptible. All economic systems require someone to have power to maintain order the system, whether it's the judges in a tribal barter system, the leaders of Russia's communist party, the heads of corporations, etc. Therefore, abuse of any economic system is guaranteed, given sufficient time.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Indeed by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where people know each other and are in a group where there is significant trust involved then Communism might be viable to a degree but the problem is that a lot of people mistakingly extend the concept to large, inhomogeneous groups that are nothing of the sort. Small groups sure, whole countries? No.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    7. Re:Indeed by aztracker1 · · Score: 1, Troll

      With capitalism you can use collective bargaining, what's the equivalent for the citizens in a communist society? Considering most communist societies don't allow their citizens to arm themselves.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    8. Re:Indeed by dunkelfalke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, that wasn't the only reason. Add trade embargoes, cold war, foreign intervention and so on - every time a communist country emerges suddenly half of the world tries to destroy its political and economical base.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    9. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.

      Well, to be fair, he doesn't. Here in Spain, politicians resorts way more often to childish games of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding than in USA or most of european countries (thanks to the damage that the civil war and 40 years of dictatorship did to our people. Not to mention the Basque Country, where hundreds of democratically elected politicians have been living (and still live) with bodyguards and are killed just because they didn't support independentism). The way Spain discusses about politics resembles a bit to what you see in many latinoamerican countries, rather to USA, or the most relevant european countries. Communism just happens to be one of the tolerable alternatives, just like in other european countries. Probably because even the people who hate it see it as an impossible pseudo christian utopy. It seem to me that conservative parties in USA don't even look it as an impossible utopy, it seems a nightmare for them. Here you can discuss about communism, but there're many other things that you couldn't discuss here. For example, what USA knows as libertarianism (Ron Paul, etc), which is something almost completely unknow here.

      And note that while Llamazares is pro-socialist, he is not 100% communist. IU is a coalition, and while the communist party (PCE) is probably the biggest, their political agenda is very fuzzy. They know they hate capitalism (what they think capitalism is), but they don't really know what they should do, except raising taxes to rich people.

    10. Re:Indeed by paeanblack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      not that it can work on the scale of a country...

      No pure ideology works on the scale of a modern country (pop > ~1,000,000)

      Pure democracy doesn't work for anything larger than Ancient Athens. Democracy still has pretty good ideas that are worth implementing in a system to govern a large populace. Communism is the same thing.

      Just because the US was in a 40-year penis-waving battle with a country that claimed to be communist doesn't mean anything. Open Source certainly borrows much of its core ideology from communism. Linux, Firefox, Apache, etc all seem to be working quite well for me.

      You see the same thing with Socialism. "La-la-la, health care, Obama, socialism, I can't hear you!". We've had socialist fire protection service in the US for 200 years. Everybody pays, everybody is covered, and that works much better than the alternative systems of the past.

      Communist. Democratic. Socialist. Capitalist. Fascist. Republican. Anarchist.

      Why worry about the labels? Take the best ideas from all of them and mix them to make a system that works.

    11. Re:Indeed by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a bunch of people taking a vacation together, not a viable self supporting community.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Where it has been tried except in tribal communities and modern days communes?" Well, if it didn't work in either of theses cases, nor in any more modern country, where exactly is it supposed to work - if at all?

      They are an odd case, but the Israeli kibbutzes are some of the very few successful communist communities.

    13. Re:Indeed by Tynin · · Score: 1

      The wiki page makes it seem like it is an annual get together thing, but that is only for the yearly Gatherings. Many people in the Rainbow family live together year round as fully functioning communities that provide their own cloths, food, education, etc.

    14. Re:Indeed by maxume · · Score: 1

      (Roughly speaking) How big are those groups?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:Indeed by zuzulo · · Score: 1

      In point of fact, democracy has also failed everywhere it has been tried. As has every other political system so far. Nothing lasts forever, and sometimes you just have to clear the boards and start over, hopefully having learned something from previous efforts. ;-)

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    16. Re:Indeed by diegocg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's not really communism, that's collectivism. Collectivism fits quite well with capitalism, if it's people who decide themselves to share their private properties with other people. In fact this is the basis of family, the key structure of our society. Buying shares of a company is also a kind of collectivism.

      Communism is a completely different beast. Communism thinks that today's human beings have been poisoned by our ugly ugly ugly capitalist society, so our society needs to forget all the bad things it knows, and be re-educated to be good socialist. That's why a dictatorship is needed (well, they don't call it dictatorship, of course) - people should not have freedom until they are reeducated, becase their minds are poisoned. Even when they think they're being good citiziens (say, you contract a worker, and pay him well), they are being opressors. It's neccesary to take away their freedom, so that they don't make bad things like that. Once the state (ruled by a few intellectuals who know what should be right and what should be wrong in a perfect socialist world) has reeducated the society, the central state can disappear (or not: Marx did not really tell what would happen then, because nobody would know how that world would be until it is created).

      Of course, our society is not really broken, and the perfect socialist men does not exist. Childs who were educated to be a perfect socialist man happened to have the same defects we, the poisoned capitalists, have. In fact, those childs usually ended up being more anticommunist than the rest of people. That's why communism has always failed and will always fail, it always fails to reeducate the society, and the dictatorship which is supposed to be temporary never disappears.

      Collectivity inside capitalism? I think that's a good thing. In fact, it's the one kind of collectiviy that I can imagine. There're indeed many ideas that could be tried, which don't even require to change any law. Communism? No thanks

    17. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ding Ding! You definitely get it. Communism doesn't work for communities and countries larger than "tribes".

    18. Re:Indeed by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It looks like you have heard something about Marx' works, but not much and all of it pretty distorted. Never heard of the dictatorship of the proletariat? This is how the transitional state was called by the communists themselves. The rest of your assumptions is equally distorted.

      You also refuse to see that the modern society - with all its workers rights, 40 hour week and so on - was allowed because of the fear of communist revolution. Because in the 19th century working conditions really sucked and the society was quite broken.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    19. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the important point, though. In the United States, we're taught from youth that among our country's founding principles was that you can believe in anything you want.

      Meanwhile, starting with the Cold War and continuing to this very day, if that "anything" happens to be communism, you are discriminated against.

      To join our military, or to become a naturalized American, you have to swear you're not a communist.

      And why the hell can't you be a communist, if you believe in the so-called American belief that you can believe what you want? In the previous century there used to be proud American communists, who believed that communism is consistent with American ideals, and were motivated along those lines. They were marginalized out of existence, in some cases by action of our government.

      This should disgust people who are not hypocrites. But if you take this question to a lot of people here in the US, they think you're crazy. To paraphrase the late comedian Bill Hicks, in this country, you're free. Free to do what we tell you to do.

    20. Re:Indeed by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Communism fails because it must exterminate rights, such as that to private property, to exist. That's not a matter of "labels".

      Communism also fails because it inherently facilitates the rise of Bolsheviks/Maoists, who are best suited to killing people who oppose Communism.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    21. Re:Indeed by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Having not lived in one of these groups myself, I only have the word of mouth from my sister in law. When I spoke with her about it, I never really asked or got a clear statement as to the size of the communities. I took from her that their size often fluctuated as parts of the group would sometimes move between one of their several living sites (for a lack of a better word, I'm not even sure where they got the land from, I assume a few people in the group own the lands and allowed the community to use it). I would speculate (since you asked for "roughly speaking") that the group she was living with had between 20 to 40 people based off our conversations and one of the pictures she showed me of her place. I'm unsure how many communities they make up, or if this is in anyway representative of their average community (if such a thing can be said), nor did I get a good grasp of how the different communities operate together to meet the groups needs.

    22. Re:Indeed by couchslug · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "every time a communist country emerges suddenly half of the world tries to destroy its political and economical base."

      Makes perfect sense considering the Communist threat. Let's not get amnesia about that.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    23. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democracy works, but one of the killers of almost any government is population. When density reaches a certain point, only an autocratic police state system which can respond swiftly and brutally becomes the only way to keep order. Especially if there is discontent with the people.

      Look at the middle ages in Europe. When population got to a point where it was at the absolute maximum sustainable by the farming technology, life became cheap. The death penalty was handed out on a whim, and there would be zero ramifications for it, because there would be plenty of serfs to replace the ones whose bones were shattered on the wheel for that day's amusement. It took disease that wiped out most of the continent to allow for land and resources to be used for more than just minimal sustaining of the population, and this allowed resources to be used for advancing European civilization in the late 1400s/1500s.

      We may be nearing such a population issue worldwide, where instead of having resources to be able to develop new things, every available source of energy has to go to keep people alive. This means the average life of a citizen or subject in a country becomes cheap, and can remain that way for hundreds of years until there is another die-off which causes a tyrannical system to not be able to continue.

      This time may be soon. We have long since passed peak oil, nuclear isn't really an option, and solar and wind require so much territory. Fusion is still science fantasy with no significant improvements in the field in 40 years [1], much less even reaching sustainability as an energy source. So without improvements in energy generation, it only is a matter of time before governments become more and more despotic because it is the only way to keep order.

      It is sad, but the stable state for governments is a tyranny with a ruling class, peasants, and groaning slavery. Every other form of government is just a transition to that state.

      [1]: Adding femtoseconds onto zapping some hydrogen atoms wrapped in a gold case doesn't mean a production reaction. It just means pretty fireworks.

    24. Re:Indeed by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Our populace has many kinds of idiots, including those that think the only reason communism has failed everywhere it's been tried is because the right people weren't in charge.

      If you look at many communist states they grew spectacularly despite many abuses in the system. Russia under communism for instance grew from a pre-industrial backwater that got beat down by the Japanese to a world superpower that pushed back the german war machine. Cuba grew from a defacto US plantation colony into an independent state with an infant mortality rate lower than that of the US. China became the workshop of the world under communism and the biggest US creditor holding USD 740 billion in U.S. debt. All 3 of these grew from dirt poor to states with good healthcare and education surpassing others in their region. To say they have "failed" is simplistic at best.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    25. Re:Indeed by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      There have been many attempts at communalism throughout the history of the United States, usually based on religious principles (since in the bible it mentions that the members of the early church had all things in common). Plymouth Colony was one place, although it didn't work out because of internal struggles. Orderville did work, and eventually only failed because of external pressures. The people in Orderville were notable because of their devotion to the whole, and their willing to self-sacrifice. They ate in communal meal halls, and managed enough success to export goods to other communities.

      When I've talked to communists in Latin America (since there are still communist parties in several countries down there), I've found it's divided into roughly two factions: those who want to take over the government, destroy it, and force the people into communism. The other, more moderate group takes the long approach of teaching the people to be less greedy, more kind, etc. and expect communism to naturally result, although it may take a hundred years. In my opinion the second, while difficult, is still more likely to result in a stable government than the first.

      --
      Qxe4
    26. Re:Indeed by jo42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On this topic, my favorite saying goes like this: "In Capitalism, Man takes advantage of Man. In Communism, it is the other way around."

    27. Re:Indeed by PPH · · Score: 2, Informative

      In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.

      But not in the good old USA. Where McCarthy wired electrodes to our testicles and successfully conditioned our response to the term "Communist".

      Its interesting to note that the basis for McCarthy's witch hunt was never emphasized: The fear that a political party could be manipulated by foreign powers to influence our political system for their benefit. Which was a valid concern at the time. But we've conditioned people to jump at the word "Commie" while the political elite maintains the ability to inject the agenda of other foreign interests (Israel for example) into our political system without having anyone flinch.

      And now we return you to your regularly scheduled program.
       

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    28. Re:Indeed by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

      We've had socialist fire protection service in the US for 200 years.

      So that's why fire trucks are red.

    29. Re:Indeed by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Are you serious?! Those communities I mentioned were essentially large families; literally - vast majority of members were related to smaller or larger degree. It was a natural state for our species for quite some time.

      That it worked is only natural (evolutionary pressure); what I am skeptical of is of course whether or not similar things can work on larger scale (depends on the society of course, some countries pull off "rotten socialism" quite well or have thriving local communities, which has aspects of the general idea)

      What amazes me is that it works in "large families" eluded you, that you missed direct connection with "typical" idea of family...

      Communism has only served those who've used it to gain power and money - and this doesn't help any arguments. It's nonsensical. It's like saying "Capitalism has only served those who've used it to abolish the deprecated idea of money and give equal amount of power to all people"

      Look, I live in former Soviet block. I hate those times; even though I hardly remember them, they managed to impact me in significant way. But we never had communism here.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    30. Re:Indeed by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Indeed.
      Most people definition of Communist government is "an evil and tyrannical government", which is pretty ridiculous.
      It is amazing if you actually know what socialism or communism means, how often you hear anti socialism/communism people advocate socialism/communism ideas in complete ignorance.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    31. Re:Indeed by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      well this is this little communist community, you might have heard of it. it is called China.
      Now China might not be the most loved country in the world but it is pretty hard to objectively rate a country. But whatever you might have to say about China it is one of the most powerful countries in the world.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    32. Re:Indeed by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Dont forget Jonestown.

    33. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rainbow "Family", my ass. Ask the residents around
      Ocala Florida how much crap & crime they have to put up with when the "Family" is in town.

    34. Re:Indeed by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Exactly! In any social structure, be it a government or a suicide cult, there is always a tug of war between self interest and the greater good. When one side pulls hard enough to unbalance the other everyone suffers.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    35. Re:Indeed by aurispector · · Score: 1

      They certainly are one of the most powerful counties. They really took off when they embraced capitalism. Back when they tried collective farming & such under Mao during the cultural revolution (you know, REAL communism) millions starved.

      What they have now is totalitarian capitalism. Worst of both worlds.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    36. Re:Indeed by aurispector · · Score: 2, Informative

      "China became the workshop of the world under communism..."

      No, they became workshop to the world when they embraced capitalism. When they tried collective farming & such during the cultural revolution millions starved. Pretty much the same happened in Russia. In all 3 countries you have incredible amounts of poverty, shortages of goods, etc.. I recall my neighbor's sister visiting from East Germany back in the early 80's. I took her a decade just to get permission to make the trip. She literally cried when she went into a supermarket and saw the shelves overflowing with goods.

      People that look at communism with rose colored glasses ignore the incredible tyranny and abuses. To say they succeeded is incredibly stupid at best.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    37. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What a coincidence that the Rainbow Family has been the most successful in the US... a nation that is not communist. Also consider the nature of communism and National Government. They don't mix well. When you do mix them, you end up with some kind of feudalism. Communism only works as intended in communes..small communities. Guess what? North America was colonized by communes. Our founding fathers set forth the framework of this Nation, the USA, not to uphold Capitalism, but Freedom. Our founding fathers saw Freedom as the natural order of things and vice verse. To have a society of free people, you must have a free market. Capitalism is the usual, natural culture of a Free Market. However, a free market does not exclude nor prevent the existence of a commune or communism. A free market is the only place true communism can thrive.

      Like so many things, it is not pure, true, or real if it is forced.

      That being said, No, our Great Experiment is not turning out well. We are slowly but surely slipping into some kind of feudalism ourselves due to a pop-culture of ignorance, entitlement, complacency, and popularity.

    38. Re:Indeed by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look at Russia. They went from a monarchy where the ruling class lived in luxury while the peasants lived as peasants. Then they moved to communism where the ruling class changed, but now they also controlled every aspect of society 'for the good of the people' while the workers lived as peasants. Then they changed to democracy. Wohoo. Now the ruling class was still living in luxury, the common citizens were still living in the same general conditions.

      The problem comes when the ruling class in whatever form of government uses their power to keep themselves as the ruling class. In a monarchy you kill anyone who opposes you. In communism you kill anyone who opposes you and teach everyone why you are doing everything for their own good. In democracy you enact laws to keep yourself and your buddies wealthy and in positions of power.

      Democracy != Capitalism that's the problem. Look at the RIAA for example. The free market and capitalism dictate that the RIAA should not exist anymore. Their market strategies are outdated, they overcharge for their product, and they tell the consumer what to purchase by controlling what reaches radio. They survive because they have laws enacted to protect their wealth. When people/companies use the government to be their strong arm to squash the competition everyone loses.

      Out of all of this, only democracy gives the citizens a voice to change the ruling class, all other forms of government require revolution. And although much bad is said about capitalism, name me another system where at it's pure form the individual is rewarded for productivity and punished for laziness.

    39. Re:Indeed by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Last year I talked for a while with a friend from the Forest Service in Pinedale, NV. It was sometime in late June, and he was telling me how horrible these gatherings are. He said in short, that they came in in VW busses and set up camp in the forest, without proper sanitation, garbage collection, etc. He said they were mostly drugged up constantly, many were naked, and they came into town and got into fights with the locals, shoplifted, and did such things as urinate on produce (so the shop owners would throw it away and they could collect and boil it) and generally spooked everyone.

      He complained mainly that they had no real provisions, and it was his duty as a government employee to make sure they didn't die of poor sanitation, lack of water, medical emergencies, etc. It was also a tremendous financial burden on the local governments.

      My personal opinion of the "rainbow people" is very low. Now, I know this is one-sided, but I'm more inclined to believe a hardworking family man who's been working there for years than a bunch of neo-hippies who wander around causing trouble.

      He also said they left a terrible mess and destroyed large patches of ground. Quite a testimony from people who supposedly worship nature.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    40. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think mozilla and some of the others you name would be perfectly happy under the "collectivism" category instead of communism.

    41. Re:Indeed by radtea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Therefore, abuse of any economic system is guaranteed, given sufficient time.

      Indeed, which is why inherently limited systems like social democratic or liberal democratic are vastly superior to either communism or capitalism. The only people who claim otherwise are the corrupt or the ignorant.

      I used to be one of the ignorant, of the capitalist variety, so I have some sympathy for the species, but anyone who reaches the age of thirty or forty and has not become either a social or liberal democrat (I'm a lib dem--those capitalist roots die hard!) is just a lamer.

      It is a measure of how utterly the corrupt have captured the mainstream political discourse in the US (and to some extent Canada as well) that most people couldn't even tell you what a social democrat or liberal democrat is (the former believe the state should yield to the market where there is a clear public-policy reason to do so, and the latter believe the market should yield to the state when there is a clear public policy reason for doing so. They both reach a similar middle ground, but from different ends and with different biases.)

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    42. Re:Indeed by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Regarding China I can recommend this TED presentation which shows quite nicely the change in priorities between the "communist" and "state capitalist" periods in China around the 03:50 mark. The fact there is starvation in the midst of a revolution or civil war should come as a surprise to no one and really doesn't say much about the actors in those events.

      I'm not saying there were no institutional problems, such as forcing collectivization on farmers who historically are fiercely individualist and the whole quota system is clearly a bad idea. However at least part of the reason for the shortages in the eastern block was the fact that we were bankrupting them through an expensive arms race (in fact the western world is bankrupt too though it hasn't come out yet because we're still on top for the moment and China keeps buying our debt) while also gauging them in international trade for ideological reasons. Furthermore the "supermarket shelves overflowing with goods" is a bad metric for success. It is rather an example of the west's unsustainable way of living: there is no way all the people on earth could live like this without depleting all our resources in short order. Better metrics would be general health, literacy, lack of malnutrition, etc.

      One of the problems I have with these discussions is the beam in our own eye is often ignored. The west has had more than its share of tyranny and abuses though it generally, though not exclusively, preferred to apply them to foreign countries and their populace rather than its own.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    43. Re:Indeed by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      "Fortunately for him..."
      It's not just him that benefits -- everyone benefits when political and social ideas can be discussed openly without hysteria.

    44. Re:Indeed by Corbets · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No pure ideology works on the scale of a modern country (pop > ~1,000,000)

      Pure democracy doesn't work for anything larger than Ancient Athens.

      I dunno, it works pretty well over here in Switzerland, population somewhere between 7 and 8 million.

    45. Re:Indeed by MPAB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May be so, but here in Spain what you cannot call yourself without being frowned upon is "right winger". And that includes anyone that doesn't agree with socialism. Once you get branded as a right winger, conservative or economically liberal it's down the inevitable slope to being called fascist and then ostracized.

    46. Re:Indeed by Frigo · · Score: 1

      > (Roughly speaking) How big are those groups?

      1

    47. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      .... and if it hadn't been for communism, these countries would have somehow been bypassed by the 20th century and remained in the same state?

      This sort of fallacy is commonly employed by apologists of these murderers. I grew up in Ceausescu's Romania, and from time to time I would hear some old idiot saying "look what the communists built -- now we have paved roads in the village, in 1946 we didn't have them". Well, those roads were built in spite of communism, not because of it. The correct comparison is with an equivalent Belgian village -- before WWII, Romania was much at the same level of development. We would have been like Western Europe if it hadn't been for these criminals.

      And that's just speaking about development. A minor footnote might be needed to mention the 20 millions or so of victims of Stalin, the 40 million of victims of Mao, and the 10 million or so in the smaller countries. Nazis got their fair treatment; communists should be treated accordingly, proportional to the number of victims.

    48. Re:Indeed by hanabal · · Score: 1

      communist threat of what?

    49. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you have never been in Spain.

    50. Re:Indeed by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No pure ideology works on the scale of a modern country (pop > ~1,000,000)

      Pure democracy doesn't work for anything larger than Ancient Athens.

      I dunno, it works pretty well over here in Switzerland, population somewhere between 7 and 8 million.

      Fair enough, although from my limited understanding of Switzerland their level of internal order seems to be more the natural result of the Swiss culture and collective thinking process than an example of what a 'Pure Democracy' can achieve for a country.

      If you are someone who likes their trains to run on time, I'm not so sure the magic bullet lies in simply changing the country's governmental structure; the Swiss are a wonderful addition to Humanity's tapestry of life but people who prioritise the importance of societal order as high they do are somewhat in the minority, even in the west.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    51. Re:Indeed by Bert64 · · Score: 0

      Democracy may theoretically give the citizens a voice, but in all reality it is the ruling class who hold all the cards.
      Your chance of getting elected without a massive budget and control of the media are effectively zero, the only people who do have sufficient financial resources and control over the media are the current ruling classes.
      You will find that in every "democratic" company, the ruling class will be split into 2 "parties", but these parties exist not to compete with each other but to fool the population into thinking there is competition and they have a choice. In reality, both parties are much the same and both exist merely to maintain the current status quo.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    52. Re:Indeed by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      The problem is that political parties that use the labels "social democrats" or "liberal democrats" may or may not have anything to do with the descriptions you just gave.

      I completely agree that extreme, black-and-white policies such as pure capitalism or total communism are folly. But, to give one example, the Liberal Democrats here in the UK are waaaaaay more socialist than your description of "liberal democrat" would suggest. This country under Labour has become a textbook example of the fundamental tension in any predominantly socialist community: those who contribute more are penalised for it, while those who contribute less reap the benefits. Under the policies advocated by the Liberal Democrats, it is hard to see how this would become any better.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    53. Re:Indeed by Nathrael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.

      Heh, I wish.

      Yes, it's completely true that communists (and all of them, including Stalinists) aren't inherently despised and feared here like they are in the US, and that they openly discuss their political believes without facing extremely strong opposition. In exchange, however, many people in many European countries despise neocons, strongly capitalist conservatives and libertarians (moderates and Ayn Rand-ite alikes) as "American scumbags" (or, if they are pro-military as well, "fucking Nazis"). "Free Speech? How could you *possibly* defend these racist fuckers? The government is right in censoring their hate speech!" Europe is just as extreme in many regards, it just has different "enemies" and acceptances.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    54. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: minaret

    55. Re:Indeed by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Neocons and pro military americans are despised. Capitalist conservatives aren't dismissed nor are libertarians. Free speech is freely talked about. And it isn't about 'defending the racist fuckers', it is about fomenting hatred and violence. If there is a good chance that one persons words will lead to deaths or widespread hatred/fear/chaos then you have to ask whether or not it is worth it. (I'm on the fence for extreme examples of this)

      So yeas everywhere has a range from the median that you can freely talk about. The European median is further left of course than the US. But is the range wider? Does it matter that much?

    56. Re:Indeed by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someones sig on /. says:
      In communist Russia the government controls the corporations.

    57. Re:Indeed by drsquare · · Score: 1

      How many people are in the cantons where many decisions are made? Of course, the minaret ban shows the populist failings of democracy on any scale. On the smallest scale, you have home-owner associations which are utterly horrendous.

    58. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been living from 1996? not in Spain certainly.
      BTW, do you listen to COPE? do you know the leadership of PP in Madrid? look around and you may find that fascism is (sadly) NOT ostracized here in Spain.

    59. Re:Indeed by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Switzerland has an unusual degree of cultural and ethnic uniformity that greatly aids the process.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    60. Re:Indeed by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Have you forgotten how Communists must institute Communism by erasing private property and killing all who would oppose them?
      There is no room for democracy under Communism which is why it doesn't happen, and for the state "to administer property in behalf of the people" it must crush all opponents. Communism requires Bolshevik methods to take and maintain power, Bolsheviks like all extreme ideologues don't give up power, so you get Stalin or Mao running the show while all the coffee-house "theorists" bemoan the lack of true Communism.

      The essence of Communism is its ultimate end products, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot.

      That's why I favored the Cold War, including its excesses, and favor the killing of Communists by any state that would do so. They cannot be reasoned with, so do 'em like Che and handle the problem.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    61. Re:Indeed by aurispector · · Score: 1

      You continue to confuse political and economic systems. As a nation, China has been a totalitarian state for all of modern history. Tienanmen square was not an accident and their continued crackdown on dissent it all the proof anyone needs. They only started rising as a nation with the embrace of capitalist ideas that allows the worst types of abuses of a capitalist system - rampant pollution, lack of any protections for workers, lack of any consumer protection against defective products, the list is endless because the only priority is economic growth. Try complaining online about the Chinese system while in china and see how long you last. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press aren't just nice ideas, they're essential to the quality of life of the average citizen.

      Your attempt to turn the discussion to the west's supposed unsustainable way of life is ridiculous. Our shelves in the west continue to overflow while all other nations on earth envy our wealth. You assume that all people WANT is a shirt, any shirt on their back, any meal in their stomachs, etc., which is an incredibly arrogant assumption on your part. Who are you to tell people what they should want or how to live their lives? You also assume that there is a finite amount of resources and that resource needs will never change. This is a sophomoric position at best. The recent spike in fuel prices highlighted the fact that there is a plethora of cleaner energy technologies waiting in the wings - the only thing holding them back is the economics of fuel prices. Hand wringer like you always discount the value of human ingenuity.

      Your selected metrics of health, literacy and nutrition are actually wonderful measures of the success of western capitalism when you compare the levels of first and third world nations because the first world wins every single time. Why? Because with our collective wealth we can better afford it. The western model shows that people are very willing to work and work hard to improve their standard of living. People who bear an entitlement mentality tend to do poorly in such a system, but then again stupidity should hurt. You can not force someone to WANT to improve their lot in life.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    62. Re:Indeed by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The basic idea is that human societies can function in a communal state as long as the size of the community doesn't exceed Dunbar's number, which represents the most number of people an individual can really know personally before they start stereotyping.

      I've often thought that returning to communities of this size would be beneficial for humanity, except then you lose the intellectual cross-pollination that occurs in large cities when there's a huge number of people together. A simple life, working with the community, but somehow still retaining the good parts that modern technology has brought us (electricity, materials science, medicine, public health, the Internet, etc.). I wonder if it's possible.

      Civilization is, in the long term, the reduction of tribalism in favor of egalitarianism. Trying to overcome the instinctive us-versus-them mentality that humans always have, and that is so easily exploited by the powerful.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    63. Re:Indeed by arachnoprobe · · Score: 1

      I dunno, it works pretty well over here in Switzerland, population somewhere between 7 and 8 million.

      Yeah, until some outsiders come around. Then you get the tyranny of the majority ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority ). Tolerance? Yes! Want to build some minarets? No. ..

    64. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free speech, in my America?

      Less likely than you think.

    65. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since both communist and capitalist states were established on the same principals of race and nationality, it's not about 'people' trying to organize their economic systems, it's about sectarian rulers coming up with something that compromises between economic feasibility, and their capacity to get away with whatever they want to do. Down with the state!

    66. Re:Indeed by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Try complaining online about the Chinese system while in china and see how long you last. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press aren't just nice ideas, they're essential to the quality of life of the average citizen.

      I agree, I'm also not defending the Chinese government here.

      Our shelves in the west continue to overflow while all other nations on earth envy our wealth. You assume that all people WANT is a shirt, any shirt on their back, any meal in their stomachs, etc., which is an incredibly arrogant assumption on your part.

      What people want is irrelevant, everybody wants to live like the Sultan of Brunei. It's unsustainable because it's only possible because of exploitation like that of the workers in China (and Africa and South-America) whose products we buy. Our shelves are overflowing because we are emptying others'.

      Hand wringer like you always discount the value of human ingenuity.

      I firmly believe we could engineer our way out of current mess but will we ? I'm not convinced the powers that be, who are all heavily involved in oil politics, won't run western civilization into the ground first. I'm a cynic, so shoot me.

      Your selected metrics of health, literacy and nutrition are actually wonderful measures of the success of western capitalism when you compare the levels of first and third world nations because the first world wins every single time.

      I agree, we've done quite well but we started with a lead (at least partly due to western imperialism and colonization.) My point was that countries who started their modern development later under a communist system improved a lot and generally more than their third world neighbors. If they failed, they failed upward.

      People who bear an entitlement mentality tend to do poorly in such a system, but then again stupidity should hurt. You can not force someone to WANT to improve their lot in life.

      I don't understand this mentality, equating poverty to stupidity and laziness, at all. It must be part of the famous protestant work ethic.

      TL;DR I think we'll have to agree to disagree ;-)

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    67. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security."

      Nah, you just get bombed, then you capitulate to the bombers demands, then complain heavily to another country that frowns upon you capitulation when they back away due to your actions.

      Such is Spain to the US.

      btw, with your name calling (and +4 Insightful on /. no less), so that's why Obama won. Liberals and socialists are hysterical cowards and uneducated drones. Because Obama said what they wanted to hear.

      I guess people will continue to play that card of the others having no reason as long as it suits their political and mental ends. To me, it seems very likely you are one of those people who make a living complaining the political landscape is such that we cannot have diverse discussion, while carrying on practices that make it exactly so. So you understand, I'll resort to your methodology of insults--you are a hypocritical ass.

      For every Communist "sympathizer," there's someone willing to mention McCarthy. In fact, I think a followup already has. For every socialist or progressive or communist, there's a right winger or militant conservative or reactionary.

      The facts remain, you want to be CORRECT (I almost said RIGHT, but that would be an insult to you too), not that you've earned or analyzed all the options. You just, well, took the low road and insulted your way into the argument, didn't you.

    68. Re:Indeed by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      communist threat of what?

      Borscht. Its terrifying stuff.

    69. Re:Indeed by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      BS. They don't even share a language, they have four. They do share dedication to the ideals of their state, but that's about it.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    70. Re:Indeed by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pure democracy doesn't work for anything larger than Ancient Athens.

      And Athens didn't have universal suffrage. It's easier to have time to be involved in politics when you have slaves doing the hard work.

    71. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Switzerland the country that voted to ban minarets?

    72. Re:Indeed by m0rtadelo · · Score: 1

      I must agree with MPAB to a certain point. That fear of the right wing parties to be related by left wing powers to fascims is what made former president Aznar ridiculously label his own conservative party as a centric party. IMHO it will still take some generations to weaken the mainstream idea of relating the conservative parties to something intrinsically non-democratic thanks to our historic heritage. What is more interesting is that other countries under recent dictatorship regimes, but with other ideological perspective, such as Poland, tend to bind left wing ideology to something intrinsically bad, corrupt or anti-democratic (just the same thing that happens in Spain but with the opposite ideology).

    73. Re:Indeed by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I do wonder how more efficient means of remote communication are changing that. It seems that without them it is indeed hard to overcome (evolutionary) instincts manifesting themselves in Dunbar's number.

      But we are now able to know people much better without getting ourselves so easily into a situation that triggers competitive instincts. Free software / OSS movement would be one example, probably...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    74. Re:Indeed by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 1

      That's why Jefferson advocated revolution every 20 years. You give a group of people too long in power and the laws meant to protect the people from the government instead protect the government from the people. The bill of rights is not for the rights of the people, instead it is to limit the rights of the government. Look at the wording.

    75. Re:Indeed by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      here in Spain what you cannot call yourself without being frowned upon is "right winger"

      As it wasn't that long ago that "right winger" in Spain meant "supporting Franco" this is hardly surprising.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    76. Re:Indeed by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      but they go to book burnings too, sometimes...doesn't that make them fascists?

    77. Re:Indeed by bantab · · Score: 1

      Open source communities are oligarchies. Just because you contribute code doesn't mean you have a say.

  7. NOT the first time the FBI used google images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years back the FBI created a wanted poster for Philly Mobster Frankie "No lips chin balls" DeCicco from a cropped goatsex image.

  8. Biometrics by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a fucking great combination with biometric data. How are they coming along with facial recognition?

  9. found the REAL picture by gearloos · · Score: 0, Troll

    -Why are we giving this guy a seconds notoriety? He has had a little augmentation done but still plain the see it's him. http://www.losingtouch.co.uk/gallery/d/18122-2/Freak.jpg

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  10. The FBI's newest tool by gearloos · · Score: 1

    The FBI's Newest Tool "Is the guy updating Osama Bin Laden's picture!" - There. fixed that for you.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  11. Re:Wait, what? by ccguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You must be American.

  12. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because he's the individual in question.

    Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
    It's been 17 seconds since you hit 'reply'. Chances are, you type faster than 1 WPM.

  13. Amateur hour yet again. by EWAdams · · Score: 1, Redundant

    First the CIA jails and interrogates people when it is no part of their charter to do so and they have no training at it, producing an unmitigated diplomatic disaster for the USA and no valuable information. Now the FBI assembles "wanted" photos using Google images.

    Where does the incompetence in the American security apparatus end?

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:Amateur hour yet again. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Seriously, doesn't OBL have 50 half brothers or something? Some of them must be older than him.

    2. Re:Amateur hour yet again. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      But they share a bank with Bush, so its cool.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Amateur hour yet again. by LostCluster · · Score: 0

      This isn't the FBI's failure as much as it is one man that the FBI hired committing middle school level plagiarism by grabbing a photo off the Internet in place of doing original work.

    4. Re:Amateur hour yet again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be able to ask the CIA about this as they cleared him, and trained him as an agent. Surely they must have some images even though they might claim those images are classified to hide their embaracement.

    5. Re:Amateur hour yet again. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Then again, making that mistake in middle school isn't likely to get someone deeply inconvenienced, embarrassed, or, y'know, shot. Maybe we should hold the security services to a higher standard if they are to be granted powers that the common citizen does not have?

      Then again, these are the same security services who IIRC managed to put a US senator and a world-renowned peace campaigner, among others, on "terrorist" watch lists. I guess expecting any exercise of common sense was just wishful thinking.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  14. Sue the FBI by iphinome · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does the FBI own the rights to the image they're showing around? Aren't they violating copyright? Can't they be sued for millions in made up damages?

    1. Re:Sue the FBI by The+FBI · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does the FBI own the rights to the image they're showing around? Aren't they violating copyright? Can't they be sued for millions in made up damages?

      Would you really like to find out?

    2. Re:Sue the FBI by TechForensics · · Score: 1

      Does the FBI own the rights to the image they're showing around? Aren't they violating copyright? Can't they be sued for millions in made up damages?

      Nope, in the US you can use the image of a public figure for many purposes-- he's fair game. Of course, he might win a case of defamation if he could show generally that members of any significant group he's in actually *believed* he were Osama based on the picture.

      His only recourse will be diplomatic.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    3. Re:Sue the FBI by Kumiorava · · Score: 1

      That is as long as the image is taken by FBI or FBI cleared rights to that particular image.

    4. Re:Sue the FBI by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      Hmm, how could having your photo publicly identified as being that of a terrorist possibly harm one's life? I can't imagine. That is, I can't imagine how people can possibly think this is acceptable. I can't think of any worse kind of defamation.

  15. They used it in another picture as well! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Something must be quite wrong when a forensic artist uses google images to find suitable features.

    But it is even more worrying that they used Llamazare's features for another picture!

    They took the Spanish PM's eyes and hair again for an image of a _different_ wanted terrorist:
    http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/01/16/internacional/1263662696.html
    http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/index.cfm?page=atiyah_abd&language=english

    One wonders about the reliability of such wanted pictures, when it seems they serial produce them, cutting and pasting from the same image...

    1. Re:They used it in another picture as well! by md65536 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One wonders about the reliability of such wanted pictures, when it seems they serial produce them, cutting and pasting from the same image...

      ... unless they were looking for very general-looking features, that display a recognizable trait. They don't need to be precise to be reliable. Consider how we can recognize caricatures of celebrities from very stylized cartoon drawings.

      But that makes it even more disturbing that they'd use a real and recognizable person, without his knowledge. It's not that his features matched exactly what they want, it's that they feel he has some generally useful features that can be used in a variety of composites. They're taking a person and turning him into clip art. Callous.

      You wouldn't use pictures of yourself to make composites of wanted terrorists. You wouldn't use family or friends, or probably even a citizen of your country. But if you don't give a rat's ass about other people in the world, you can do whatever you want with an image of one without feeling a shred of shame. Worse yet, if there are people you don't like but you can't attack them with legitimate arguments, why not try to associate them with bigger enemies? What better way to do that than to use their image to create pictures of terrorists? You could implicitly say "Here's you as a terrorist" while explicitly saying "The image was used randomly for its general features and is not meant to be identified with the original subject."

      It's outrageous, egregious, preposterous.

    2. Re:They used it in another picture as well! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dream of a day when all Spanish politicians are put in Guantanamo.

    3. Re:They used it in another picture as well! by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      I still haven't seen any posts about using age-enhancement software. This has been around for 15 years at least, I remember seeing the age-progression morph video with a disclaimer "this image was produced by digitally applying common aging patterns to the source picture" - later shortened to "what they may look like now using age-progression" and often "thanks to blah laboratories for providing age-enhancement techniques."

      Wouldn't the FBI want to use such a thing, and maybe add some "died from lack of dialysis" marks here and there, instead of Photoshopping something together???

      There's a fucking app on FaceBook to do this!!! AgeMe For free!! Google search for "age progression" leads to several free sites where you could do it as well. FBI doesn't want the public to know? Contact the authors and ask them to do a special job under NDA.

  16. Next stop- no fly list by jvillain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How long till Gaspar Llamazares ends up on the no fly lst because of this?

    1. Re:Next stop- no fly list by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Not too long now. Hell, Ted Kennedy's still on the list.

    2. Re:Next stop- no fly list by codegen · · Score: 1

      Hell, Ted Kennedy's still on the list.

      And he's dead to boot!!

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    3. Re:Next stop- no fly list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What do you mean still? I think it's gone from being a negative when he was alive to being a positive now that he's dead. I know discrimination is a bad word these days, but I think it's completely justified for the FBI and the TSA to have a standard policy against dead people flying on regular passenger aircraft.
       
      I know, I know -- you can't always tell whether someone is dead by looking at them. Frankly, I'm willing for a few false positives to have problems getting on flights if it means no more rotting corpses or zombies sitting next to me while I try to watch a tasty sampling of NBC's comedy line-up.

    4. Re:Next stop- no fly list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'd shit my pants if I saw Ted Kennedy on a plane.

  17. coincidence? by malp · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know I've never seen Bin Laden and this Gaspar Llamazares fellow in the same place at the same time. Just saying...

    1. Re:coincidence? by maxume · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've never seen George Walker Bush and Barack Obama in the same place at the same time. I've seen video purported to show as much, but we all know what they can do with that these days.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:coincidence? by malp · · Score: 1

      Good point.... I haven't seen Barack Hussein Mohammad Obama on Fox News once. What is he afraid we'll find out?

    3. Re:coincidence? by Verunks · · Score: 1

      I've never seen George Walker Bush and Barack Obama in the same place at the same time. I've seen video purported to show as much, but we all know what they can do with that these days.

      I guess you missed the obama inauguration then http://cache.boston.com/universal/site_graphics/blogs/bigpicture/44_01_21/4425_17677757.jpg

    4. Re:coincidence? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Correct. I was not there in person and do not believe the so-called "photo evidence".

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:coincidence? by daseinw · · Score: 1

      Your wish is my command:

      Here's a photo and an article of http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34893608/ns/world_news-haiti_earthquake/ entitled "Obama enlists Bush, Clinton to help on Haiti" that depicts George Walker Bush and Barack Obama in the same place at the same time. I think it's safe to say that this is a real photo.

    6. Re:coincidence? by maxume · · Score: 1

      You think it is real? Because it was published by the MSNBC?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  18. "Special agent"... by santax · · Score: 1

    as in, special Olympics?

  19. He now has to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    air travel until Osama bin Laden is caught, identified, confesses, is executed. God knows Llamazares is thinking one day an air marshall is going to put a slug in his chest after finding Osama bin Laden in an airport because of that picture.

    And I know all of you are saddened at the fact that his fears are perfectly reasonable.

  20. Why don't we progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would suspect that after thousands of years we would have a better solution then killing and war....

    1. Re:Why don't we progress by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "You would suspect that after thousands of years we would have a better solution then killing and war...."

      War works quite nicely.

      Force trumps law, because law is an imaginary construct and bullets are real.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  21. Mod parent UP by sslayer · · Score: 1

    What the fuck! Llamazares shouldn't go ever to the US, the best thing that can happen to him is a shot in the forehead, if airport police has watched for a while this photos, he will really seem to them like a terrorist...

  22. Baseless arguments by bdrewery · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, Ben Affleck apparently died in pakistan

    1. Re:Baseless arguments by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on! Don't get my hopes up.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Baseless arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently somebody at huffpo still holds a grudge over gigli...

  23. Get used to it, halfassed is how we do things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't have a good picture of your target?
    Don't have enough description to draw a picture of your target?
    Don't worry, just use someone else's photo from the internet, it's not like they'll notice...
    After all, actually having a picture of the correct target is less important than being able to tell your boss, "um, yeah, we did a forensics pic of the terrorist...".

  24. This article's title is rubbish because... by Jorl17 · · Score: 0

    It's a precipitated generalization.

    --
    Have you heard about SoylentNews?
  25. I knew it all along by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally the proof I have been waiting for, Llamas really are EVIL! Sure they may look cute standing there chewing cud, but the FBI is on to their secret plot to hijack airliners and crash them into alpaca farms. Keep up the good work boys!

  26. Re:Wait, what? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ignorance and stupidity aren't exclusive American traits.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  27. Re:Indeed! But its true - leadership is everything by bussdriver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ben Franklin said any government is fine if it is well administered. He is correct.

    All governments fall to despotism eventually as history has shown to be the case; Franklin basically stated this at the end of the constitutional convention.

    No, not exact quotes, I can think beyond those; having found them before. If you want it the source quotes go find them like I did (well, I didn't have internet back then...)

    --------
    Grandparent is spot on. Americans don't know jack - its like brave new world; we need a term to describe this lack of civic duty.

  28. Terrorists!!!-Butterfly Effect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not the tribal man I fear. It's the crazies who listen to him, strap a suicide belt on and go blow innocents up.

  29. Gray by pgn674 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, that is some light grey text. The color of the date between the title and the main text is #999999, or 60% white (with 0% white being black). That text is more white than black, on a white background. The main text of the article isn't as bad, with the color #666666, or 40% white. But still, that is really uncomfortable to read, especially if you have a display with small pixels. The 11px font size and normal font weight doesn't help.

    Has anyone else noticed the trend for news sites to make their text whiter and whiter, while maintaining a pure white background? I'm not a web designer, but as a user, this is getting really annoying.

    Oh, and strangely enough, the title of the article is actually the same exact color as the main text: #666666.

    1. Re:Gray by Inda · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like most consumer printers, this is the web's version of the economy "save ink" settings. These days, everyone is trying to cut costs.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  30. FBI must be legally blind by Dracos · · Score: 3, Funny

    That guy doesn't represent what bin Laden would look like now. You can tell because:

    • That guy looks nothing like bin Laden
    • That guy doesn't look like he's been in a shallow grave for 8 years
  31. Indeed WTF? by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    But, Señor Llamazares is a Commie

    Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding. In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.

    Stateside, I bet many people would consider calling the police. But such is the state of our populace: hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security.

    And yet for those who clicked on a Reuters story we didn't see this calling of the police by uneducated drones, and hysterical cowards. Of course we didn't have an intellectual discussion of what it means to be communist, but then the story was basically "we goofed" and an apology.

    Sounds like some of you have too many axes to grind.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  32. Genetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would argue it is an inherent flaw in humans.

    Males are aggressive and their whole purpose biologically is to spread their seed and they have some traits to make sure it goes beyond reproduction which is arguably a little weaker. So the ones who succeed in the pursuit of power likely will spread those traits on at least as well as normal. Anyhow, I think biology encourages the traits that pushes males to hurt the system and in a more obscure way, society.

    Women I've not seen or read about behaviors that add to the problem; however, I have seen plenty of promotion for their offspring over others for those who strongly associate their child's success with their own or at least make it extremely important their kids get above the others. In this sense, they are every bit as bad as the men with the same mentality (other than the two act it out differently.)

    Many legit religious figures such as nuns who live a communist lifestyle do not procreate- so unfortunately, the trait most desirable they may have is not spread. Perhaps they should... and the rest of us should just adopt their babies. Seriously think about this concept. So--- why is it ok for 100s of years to fool with animals for traits but not with humans? (keep in mind "race" is more about simplistic appearances than actual genetic backing.) Ok... now you thought about that--- what about the stupid people breeding so much? genetically diseased people? should we draw a line?

    Ok-- so-- we don't draw a line right? Well, then what about the big elephant in the room: overpopulation is the biggest problem in the world today. Limit reproduction, regulate it-- and we bring up similar issues again or at least the prospect that they influence the decision on who is allowed to reproduce. think about it.

  33. In the misquoted words of David Wong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For my part, I just hope Brad Pitt never does anything to piss off the Department of Homeland Security."

  34. Me BAD by omb · · Score: 1

    And now you wonder why people hate the USA?

  35. Re:Wait, what? by Eudial · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ignorance and stupidity aren't exclusive American traits.

    When it takes the form of McCarthyism, it invariably is.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  36. Are you him? by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    Is your skin anything but the purist of whites? Do you speak with an accent (from MY frame of reference)? Do you have a beard? Wear funny-looking clothes (again, from MY frame of reference)?

    Then congratulations! YOU can be our next international terrorist! But, don't count yourself out just because you look like a white American. If you've ever visited one of the countries on our list and especially if you happened to be photographed while wearing the local fashions (we really like turbans), then you can join in too!

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  37. Wow by genmax · · Score: 1

    This makes sharing your name with someone on the no-fly list sound like a lucky break!

  38. Compares photographies by diegocg · · Score: 1

    If you take a look here, you can compare both photographies. Note that the hair is the same...

  39. This reminds me of... by moose_hp · · Score: 1

    I used to have a spot on the 2th page of Google Images' query "los 10 mas buscados de la pgr" (the top ten wanted of the PGR (mexican federal police)), after a quick google, it seems that the photo was removed from the query (it is still on my flickr stream anyway).

    It used to be a great conversation topic, something like "oh yeah, and I'm one of the top ten wanted of the PGR" "naw, you're joking" "you don't beleive me? google it yourself" "oh shit, you really are".

    --
    DON'T PANIC.
  40. Re:Wait, what? by Nikkos · · Score: 0, Troll

    What exactly does that have to do with the question I posed? Communism has been directly responsible for the deaths of 100 million people, yet this communist is worried about individual rights?

    Instead of making a comment to defend communism or correct my misunderstanding, you make a snide comment on my nationality. Kinda sad really.

  41. spending money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Follow the money.

    Weird tax laws, weird drug laws, weird terrorist threats...

    The bigger the central government the worse it is. The government that governs the least governs the best.

  42. Just a cut and paste job? by PPH · · Score: 1

    First of all, I don't think Gaspar has much to worry about. The primary facial features of bin Laden appear to have been pasted over his photo. Other then the hair, they don't loo alike at all.

    What does bother me is that; it takes quite a bit more than cut and paste (and throwing some gray into the hair) to properly 'age' a photograph. Changes to the nose, ears, winkles, creases, and bags under the eyes all have to be calculated and incorporated into the new photo. Was that actually done? Or did someone just put this together after taking the You Suck at Photoshop online course?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Just a cut and paste job? by bipbop · · Score: 1

      You left out bone changes, which can be the defining difference over time.

  43. Yeah, in many parts of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    you can call yourself a National-Socialist and then have a discussion about what that means, too. In Germany, where people actually remember very well what this means, the discussion would be with the police.

    As a Russian whose family members have been killed and whose country was seriously screwed up by Communists (who were also, of course, Marxists) I wish those societies where grandstanding as a Communist is acceptable would wake up before they get screwed up in their turn.

  44. "hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security"

    this is true of every society on this planet, and every society that ever existed, and any society that ever will exist. its the trailing end of the bell curve, what can you do? so you don't have to like the usa, but don't single out the usa for the crimes of humanity itself

    i'm an american, and i can have an open rational discussion of the benefits/ failures of communism, socialism, capitalism, libertarianism, marxism, authoritarianism, bring it on

    oh, there's one more problem with humanity you should know about, that is not unique to the usa: the kind of person who over-generalizes and prejudicially judges an entire race or country, just because of the sins of a few loud few

    you wouldn't perchance know an example of such a person's words, would you? ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  45. Logic 101. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are you aware that you shot down your opening statement by linking to those stories?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  46. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but they are primary ones.

  47. The Monkeysphere by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    What do monkeys have to do with war, oppression, crime, racism and even e-mail spam? You'll see that all of the random ass-headed cruelty of the world will suddenly make perfect sense once we go Inside the Monkeysphere.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  48. so why not use president obama as osama LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.

  49. Space RFID laser by BabiYar · · Score: 1

    This is nothing. The DOD has a space based submillimeter laser com system at about 850GHz that can lock onto your teeth. It is in fact being used right now in the San Fransisco Bay Area as a demo. Full video, sound, and body control. It can be used for com spy use, "war", and putting voices into your head as words (analog signals.) Who has a bolo meter, you are going to need one? Google directed energy weapons, submillimeter laser, radar.

    1. Re:Space RFID laser by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The only way to be free of control by the Man is to suicide before he inevitably invades your mind. Your are tracked constantly because you are valuable, he must and will own you unless you break the chain in a way that ensures no information can be retrieved from your brain. Pleasant dreams.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Space RFID laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? Telling people to commit suicide. What an asshole.

  50. Eh no, he tried to confirm it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Informative

    He claims the news is erased from the MIND, not the internet (archives). He then backs up his claim by linking to past news stories that he says conflict with this one but apparently have been forgotten.

    Sadly he does make another mistake, people may assume Bin Laden is death, but they have no evidence so they keep looking until they are 100% sure.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  51. And what about capatalism? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The free market, how does it stand with the US economy in tatters, the banks going on as if nothing has happened, 10% unemployment, a national debt that can never be paid off.

    What is most amazing about your kind is that you never can admit that your system has been failing rather badly as well. Americans are like the british, still proud of their empire, long after it crumbled. Nero playing emperor while Rome burns.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:And what about capatalism? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      but we didn't have capitalism in the U.S., we had "state capitalism" of oligarchy, which despite silly name has nothing to do with free markets or capitalism. And the oligarchy merely used the recent troubles to help themselves to more wealth in exchange for debt on the workers. Failure of something?, yes; capitalism? none such here.

  52. Error WTF?!? by the+person+standing · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    The embassy's Councilor for Public Affairs William Ostic told Reuters that he telephoned LLamazares Saturday to apologize for the error.

    Calling this an error, while clearly occurred on intention, is again a defamation. Calling it an error because he's a politician is not better at all.

  53. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Thought it got patented.

  54. There is a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point. However, if you have abundance in your heart, then there is no need to extend power out in the world for your own personal gain.
    Instead power becomes becomes a tool, to further the collective good.

    If you have peace in your heart, then there is no need to bring peace out in the world by means of force and violence.
    Instead peace becomes a platform for understanding and education.

    Spirituality and humanism can pretty much guarantee a peaceful, prosperous and developing world. Just too bad so few people treasure it yet.
    We are still like small children, kicking and yelling and throwing tantrums.

  55. Communism still a problem today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharing is not communism. In the past we've shared alot more than now. From my neighbours lawnmower (today we buy our own), to sharing carts, land, etc.
    Open source is just more economically viable by sharing labour into one project, reduces complexities and cost, and also closer to natural effectiveness (more eyeballs vieweing the source).
    It is not communism to share. Communism is a political ideology, usually a failed one, and usually taking over with violence.

    You can use two definitions "communism" and "Communism", however, countries like Nepal and India are still having problems with Communism. So we should refrain to support it, because these people are ignorant, and plays on the ignorant to win votes or revolutionaries. Nepal became Communist, and is now having huge problems, while India is almost in a state of civilian war because of Communism.

    In my view, Communism and communism is a failed ideology. We should instead turn to spirituality and humanism. Find a new word, don't bring up the failed ideologies, because human deaths are very real consequences of that!

  56. Better pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are better pictures for comparison in the BBC article

  57. Troll? by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sorry Big Brother, it seems the slashdot ministry of truth didn't approve my post but there's no need to tie a rat to my face, I will correct my misprinted copy of 1984 immediately. /doublethink

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  58. Re:Angle of repose by conureman · · Score: 1

    "the stable state for governments is a tyranny with a ruling class, peasants, and groaning slavery. Every other form of government is just a transition to that state."
    Might I add:
    "Hot on the left, cold on the right, and the shit flows downhill."
    In my quest to grok geologic time, one lesson keeps repeating itself, and that is that acquiescence to physics is correct.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  59. Re:Wait, what? by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "He's a Communist. Why is he worrying about the rights of an individual?"

    Pretty funny how the political theorists of Slashdot can blithely ignore Communist practice and mod your post Flamebait, but will gleefully attack _religious_ outcomes in contrast to religious theory. (Che Guevara looks hawt from Mom's basement. Mmm, so beardy and macho...)

    Religion and politics should be judged by the results they produce, not by theories have shit to do with facts on the ground.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  60. Re:Indeed! But its true - leadership is everything by Dirtside · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Founders should have included a clause in the Constitution that it was null and void after 100 years and would have to be rewritten by a new constitutional convention. :)

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  61. I wonder by shitzu · · Score: 1

    Could we enhance that?

  62. Why him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A photo of Beyoncè could have had an even better effect.

  63. finding that picture by idigitallDotCom · · Score: 1

    But to find that picture, what did the FBI search for?

    "pictures man looks like older osama bin laden lookalike" ?

    What is the search strategy for finding a picture of the future Barak Obama?

    --
    blog.idigitall.com
  64. Works well? by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    And when exactly did you give women the right to vote? Oh yeah, right: 1971

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  65. You look like... by DeVilla · · Score: 1

    Count DeMonet: your majesty! You look like the piss boy!

    King Louis: ... and you look like a bucket of shit!

  66. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is McCarthy? Beyond that, Communists aren't actually a nice alternative to Corporatist Fascism. It's just a different was to organize a dictatorship. The problem is any form of Dictatorship, whether it's a Monarchy, Fascist State, Corporatist Monopolistic Oligarchy, Feudal Society, Communist State, Military Dictatorship, Un-Elected International Treaty Governing Body, etc. . .

    Those are the only two choices. Individual rights and liberty, or authoritarian control by illegitimate despots who simply must know what you're up to at all times. I don't know how anyone in their right mind could choose the latter. What, do you hate yourself or something?

  67. Re:They used this tutorial apparently by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    http://www.exguides.org/photoshop-tutorials/age-progression.html

    (as much as I hate replying to oneself) Using Katie Holmes as an example:

    Reference material is key in my method of aging. Keeping Katie's face in mind, I scoured the Web, looking for faces of old women who either resemble Katie and/or share the same facial expression. Here, Katie is smiling with her face positioned at a 3/4 angle so I tried to gather as many pictures of old women who are smiling in the same manner or close to that. I then opened up the picture of Katie in Photoshop and pasted the found images around her face on a separate layer, spread out to provide easy visual access.

    Find older people who resemble the person, copy and paste. But they forgot this part, which might have helped:

    Another kind of reference I like to use but is usually hard to find, is pictures of the subject's parents. I managed to find a couple of reference pictures of Katie's mother online and they really helped me to decide whether or not to give Katie a double chin. Since her mom has quite a bit of mass under her chin, I decided I would apply that to Katie too.

    Hmm, actually based on the results they didn't use this tutorial at all. They assigned a task to someone without the skills or knowledge, and he bluffed his way through it.