Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Motorola Asks ITC To Ban BlackBerry Imports

Posted by Soulskill on from the not-the-tasty-blackberries-don't-worry dept.

alphadogg writes "Patent litigation between Motorola and Research In Motion is heating up, with Motorola filing a complaint with the US International Trade Commission. In the complaint, Motorola alleges that RIM engages in unfair trade practices by importing and selling products that infringe five Motorola patents. The patents cover technologies related to Wi-Fi access, application management, user interface, and power management, Motorola said. Motorola is asking the ITC to investigate RIM and bar the company from importing, marketing, and selling products in the US that use the technologies."

6 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. Well, if you can't compete... by Obstin8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    then the only option is protectionism.

    1. Re:Well, if you can't compete... by pete6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Within about 10 years or less, patent litigation will be the ONLY line of business left for former U.S. tech giants. All innovation will take place elsewhere, as it largely is already. You'll know this time is near once Microsoft loses their monopoly on the PC desktop, which they inevitably will.

    2. Re:Well, if you can't compete... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone mod this 'prophetic'.

      Prophetic? I disagree. I think he's only stating what's already happened to us. The process really began back in the sixties, and has been on an accelerating curve ever since. We just aren't feeling the full effects of it yet because we've kept up the fiction that we're a good place for foreign investment (although the cracks are showing). Fact is, the nation is still running on inertia. There's a Great Collapse coming ... I just don't know when. I really hope it's after I retire in peace to the island I plan to purchase after I win the lottery. Let all the stupid, shortsighted people here that truly believe that America doesn't need all those dirty machines and factories go to Hell in their own way. Ignorance is not bliss: it's the way to misery and poverty, and America is on that road.

      One of our Founders, Thomas Jefferson, early in his career believed that America would best be served by remaining a largely agrarian culture, with the few manufactured goods we needed being purchased abroad. He eventually realized that that was a mistake, that we needed industry in order to maintain our ideals, indeed to maintain our freedom. He always maintained a distrust of the corporate sector (very wise in retrospect) but ultimately understood that freedom was based upon independence, and that we could not be dependent upon other nations' good will if we wished to be free.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Well, if you can't compete... by Josh04 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're just plain wrong if you think the poor are lazier than the rich in any meaningful way.

  2. Americans. explain how this is 'free market'. by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    doesnt monopolizing entire national market through usage of patents and copyrights or cartel practice kinda defy the point of having one ?

    --
    Read radical news here
    1. Re:Americans. explain how this is 'free market'. by zwede · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've long had the theory that raw, uncontrolled, capitalism and communism end up the same: with a monopoly, no competition and no innovation. Only difference is with communism the state controls the monopoly, with raw capitalism the monopoly controls the state. Both rely on a submissive citizenry that can not be bothered to defend their freedom.