Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Android Carrier Forcing Firmware Update

Wolfier writes "For wireless carrier Rogers in Canada, it seems that 'Customer Safety' only becomes a concern after months of neglect. Rogers is the only GSM carrier in Canada and so the only choice for Android users. Months ago, a customer called Rogers to report a firmware bug that was preventing users from making 911 calls under certain circumstances, and informed the carrier that Google had fixed the bug (recording of that call). But Rogers is only doing something about it now — namely, cutting data access of paying customers until they accept a mandatory firmware upgrade that not only fixes the 911 problem, but also contains 'extra' features that prevent users from ever gaining root access to their phones — even non-subsidized ones. And some phones are also getting bricked by this 'official' update. The moral: we really need to open up the competition here up North."

34 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. GSM Providers by Denis+Lemire · · Score: 4, Informative

    Rogers is no longer the only GSM carrier. At the end of '09 Telus and Bell launched their own GSM networks. So counting Fido (owned by Rogers) there are now four Canadian GSM based carriers.

    1. Re:GSM Providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong.

      Bellus deployed their HSPDA network for 3G, which works across all 3G enabled phones. They still each maintain a CDMA network for regular service.

      I couldn't take a Bell or Telus Blackberry and expect to use it on Rogers unless I used their HSPDA network.

    2. Re:GSM Providers by Jonavin · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're going to count Fido as separate network (really a MVNO), then you might as well count Koodo , Solo and Virgin Canada as well. And technically Bell and Telus and their MVNO doesn't have a 2G GSM network, just a 3G UMTS/HSPA network.

      You'll also need to include WIND Mobile too if you're counting 3G networks. Although they currently don't carry any Android devices, they are the only ones with T-Mobile US devices and Nexus One users (imported from US).

      Out of all these, only Rogers (Dream/Magic/LG) and Telus (Hero) are carrying Android devices. The other networks are all capable of using imported devices by activating SIM accounts.

    3. Re:GSM Providers by Nermal6693 · · Score: 4, Informative

      A GSM-only phone will not work on Telus/Bell. The new network is WCDMA/UMTS-based and does not have a 2G GSM component.

    4. Re:GSM Providers by ChodaBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wind is only available in Metropolitan areas in the east right now so it's not an option for any of us in the west. At least not yet.

      --
      ChodaBoy
      - The preceding statement is the product of a deranged mind and the sole property of the voices in my head.
    5. Re:GSM Providers by litui · · Score: 3, Informative

      As long as the 3G phones support the correct frequencies, they will work on both networks.

      Telus: 850/1900Mhz
      Rogers: 850/1900Mhz
      Wind: 1700Mhz

      So between Telus and Rogers 3G will be compatible, but phones that also support EDGE and GPRS will not work on Telus in those modes as they lack the legacy infrastructure.

      --
      I send you this message in order to have your advice.
    6. Re:GSM Providers by Adambomb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Note: The networks you're mentioning from Telus and Bell are UMTS only, with no 2G GSM support at all. Won't matter in 5-10 years, but just a heads up.

      The problem people don't really seem to get about mobile pricing and "competition" in Canada is that it really is a system with only two sides Rogers and Telus/Bell. Telus and Bell themselves barely compete as their pricing structures are nearly identical beyond minor differences, which makes sense given their Network Sharing Agreements.

      Fido is effectively the WestJet of our carriers, cherry picking the majority of their clients within high population density areas, which did make them a competitor within the major cities and a large portion of the market until about 2004 when they became wholly owned by Rogers.

      Some people may mentioned the MVNO's Koodo and SOLO Mobile not realizing that Koodo is effectively a slightly lower margin Telus, and Solo Mobile is Bell (down to the same exact 'customer service' tools, except I believe Solo CSSR's are primarily through Canadian based subcontractors only).

      Given these details, you see we have effectively two sides only. Two sides which somehow magically conviced everyone in the country that it makes sense for them to have doubled the price (two-sided billing) of per usage SMS's from 15c to 30c a piece. Two sides that maintain suspiciously close pricing that tends to vary only by small amounts for specific cases. Two sides that maintain a consistent CHURN back and forth between the two sets of groups generating Long Term Contract Charges and a variety of fine print charges so that when One is considered the evil, users switch to the other (with similar THEY ARE THE WORST rants concerning the business model in either case, rogers OR bell). The only reason it works is that the worst things only happen to a low enough percentage for each carrier that after they ragequit and go to the other side, its unlikely for it to happen again to the same person (post 90 day billing errors that are considered valid so long as client wasnt able to ask the right question to a CSSR before the 90 days was up thanks to the Consumer Protection Act [HAH], defective merchandise that is considered not covered under warranty but still generated a contract with a valid LTCC charge if cancelled [*cough*AUDIOVOX*cough*], etc).

      The long and short of it is Telco companies have us by the short hairs up here in Canada. Heres hoping WIND Mobile takes off, but given that they only launched in friggan December, i cant have an opinion quite yet.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
  2. Rogers is terrible by Merritt.kr · · Score: 5, Informative

    I run CyanogenMod on my Rogers HTC Dream, and it has apparently had the fix for this issue for 5+ months. Yet I am still cut off from data access, they keep insisting I install their update.

    --
    It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Krishnamurti
    1. Re:Rogers is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not saying that you shouldn't do this, but the CRTC itself is a sad state of affairs. Full of corrupt members at the Telco's beck and call. For sure we should keep filing complaints, but my hopes that anything will be done about it are nil.

    2. Re:Rogers is terrible by Jester998 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I run Cyanogen on my Dream as well, but I got around the data blockage like so:

      If you were quick enough to take advantage of the free HTC Magic upgrade they offered, you can just root the Magic and install CursorSense (at least 1.2.1). CursorSense is a mod of the official Rogers firmware, so as far as Rogers is concerned, you have a 'patched' phone, so they re-enable data access on your account. At that point you can switch back to your Dream with full 3G access.

      I was without data for about a day (my Magic only arrived Monday, a day after they started blocking data), but since then I've been fine.

      Rogers can take their mandatory upgrade and shove it. :p

    3. Re:Rogers is terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I callled them, said I had installed the update. They asked me to verify the build number, which I read back to the guy from the screenshot in the update documentation, and they turned my data back on. The hardest part was the time spent on hold.

  3. Uhm, I thought it was open? by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought the one of the battle cries that Android fanboys wave at the iPhone fanboys was that it was open and you weren't locked into running what the provider wanted, you had root on your own device and they can't take it away ... Turns out they can force remote updates and lockout root?

    Gonna be lots of pissed off fanboys, this should be a nice calm discussion ...

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Uhm, I thought it was open? by MorderVonAllem · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the summary they're not remote updating but cutting off access if you don't update the firmware - a bit different. Though I didn't RTFA as it's just a forum...

    2. Re:Uhm, I thought it was open? by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yea, I'm a douche, I didn't even read the entire summary apparently.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Uhm, I thought it was open? by Thinboy00 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Android doesn't come with root. It comes with the ability to install your own apps without having to jump through some lame "app store" or other technical/political hoops.

      --
      $ make available
    4. Re:Uhm, I thought it was open? by Heretic2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You just have to fake your Android version to appear to be the version they're looking for. If you look through the forum threads linked in the story the exact method is there. I will put it here for convenience:

      adb shell reboot recovery
      ***Wait for Magic to boot into recovery***
      adb shell mount -a
      adb shell
      cd system
      ls
      ***look for your build file, will be build.prop or build.sapphire.prop most likely***
      CTRL-D ***to quit the shell***
      adb pull /system/build.prop ***or whatever it was called***
      ***make a backup copy and edit the file***
      adb push build.prop /system/build.prop
      adb shell reboot

      The actual changes you need to make to the file are:

      ro.build.description=3.05.631.7 CL#118917 release-keys
      ro.build.changelist=118917
      ro.product.ua=
      ro.build.fingerprint=rogers/htc_magic/sapphire/sapphire:1.5/CUPCAKE/118917:user/release-keys
      ro.build.display.id=DRC92 3.05.631.7

      Once you reboot your Magic, you should see the changes in Settings->About Phone under "Build Number".

      Call into Rogers and get then to reset your network and you should be good.

    5. Re:Uhm, I thought it was open? by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The people who aren't going to be capable of doing this are the exact same group of people that DON'T GIVE A SHIT that they don't have root or that they update their firmware.

      Get some perspective

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:Uhm, I thought it was open? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If they can't/won't do this, they should not have root privileges. People who have root privileges who are the type unable to do what it takes to get around Rogers' "fix", are usually the type who will get pwned. If they are just unwilling to do what it takes, then they don't need root.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  4. Security Updates... now with push support! by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On a closed system, the company behind the system should be able to push updates, especially when there's a security or safety risk involved.

    But Google is claiming this is an "open" smartphone... and under this scheme it's usual that the user control when to upgrade.

    What a contradictory situation this brings up...

  5. Read a full background here by litui · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've documented everything I've collected on the issue here: http://www.litui.net/archives/796

    More detailed and ordered than the OP's links.

    --
    I send you this message in order to have your advice.
  6. Re:How ironic by dubbreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is there anything Rogers gets right? Or are they currently the most abusive monopoly Canucks have to live with?

    While I agree rogers sucks, they aren't a monopoly. Canada does have a problem with cell providers though. There has to be collusion between the cell companies, that's the only explanation for the ridiculous rates canadians have to put up with. I've had a cell phone since '98 and comparable plans have not gotten cheaper since then. I've been on all the major canadian carriers as well and while coverage is acceptable now it still sucks. Best coverage and cost I ever had was in Vancouver with Fido before they were bought out by Rogers.

    "High speed" internet is the same thing. It costs the same as I was paying in the 90's and I had better bandwidth then (no upload speed caps, much more consistent DL speeds). If I want higher upload rates I now have to pay a premium for them to up the cap. Awesome.

    --
    "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  7. Contract breaking? by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering that Rogers isn't giving you data service anymore, a service that you pay for, could this be used as a way to break out of the contract?

    After all, they refuse to provide the data service, they're not holding up their end of the deal, and you're paying for a service you cannot use.

    Hell, at least call them and demand a credit for service not provided. Or move the SIM card to an iPhone and demand they activate the data service.

    It's not like the data comes with the plan - you're free to buy any voice plan with a data plan.

    1. Re:Contract breaking? by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not very useful advice, considering that the cost of a lawyer will probably be more than the cost of EITHER just paying the remaining contract, OR breaking it and paying some sort of penalty. So consulting a lawyer is the worst possible option, worse than asking on Slashdot and taking the resulting advice, even if it turns out to be wrong.

  8. Word #5 by michaelmalak · · Score: 5, Funny

    It wasn't until the fifth word that I realized the U.S. wasn't under attack.

  9. GSM is not HSPDA, Telus does not have GSM. by starbugs · · Score: 3, Informative

    GSM is 2G
    Telus has HSPDA (or commonly called HSPA).
    No GSM-only phone will work on Telus or Bell.

    Many new 3G phones can use Both, so an unlocked phone can be on either network by just switching sim cards.
    Besides having the same Tech. The phones must also support the specific frequencies used by that carrier.
    Many European 3G phones will not work in North America.

    It is rumored that Telus will get both the Milestone and perhaps even the Opus one this year.

  10. On top of all that... by CraigoFL · · Score: 5, Informative

    The user-applied fix isn't available for Mac or Windows 7 users. Those users are required to call into the Rogers tech support line to get the fix.

    I did that, and had to wait on hold for over 30 minutes while the phone support waded through the (expected) deluge of calls. When I got through, I was told that I could either:

    • Go to a Rogers store to get the fix
    • Have a micro-SD card shipped to me (3-5 biz days wait) that contained a fix. (I don't know why they couldn't offer the fix for download).

    I stopped in the Rogers store to get the fix. I waited for about 20 minutes while the customer support people (calling them "techs" wouldn't be accurate) installed the fix software on their in-store computers. Then I was told that the fix would wipe my phone. Did I have a backup? I said no; I haven't been able to find any evidence of Rogers-capable phone-sync software that works on my Mac (it's all Windows only). The store person offered to make a backup there, but after doing so he said that it only backed up my contacts, not my apps or settings (IMO the important parts). I walked out hoping that the SD solution will be better, but at best, I'm locked out of my wireless Internet service for 3-5 days.

    It's hard to imagine how Rogers could have made this process worse.

  11. Some phones are more open than Android by MobyTurbo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought the one of the battle cries that Android fanboys wave at the iPhone fanboys was that it was open and you weren't locked into running what the provider wanted, you had root on your own device and they can't take it away ... Turns out they can force remote updates and lockout root?

    By comparison, Palm not only has root available on all their WebOS phones, it is provided by Palm's SDK itself and not by an unsupported hack that can be closed later at the carrier's or device maker's discretion. CEO Jon Rubenstein has even publicly praised the Homebrew community, who's efforts are encouraged, and they've promised not to close developer mode.

    Maemo, from Nokia (N900, Nokia Internet Tablets) is even more open in a way; not only you have root, you have essentially a little Linux computer with all that implies; this is due to it's UMPC heritage, it originally wasn't really a smartphone OS. (Though it's a little easier to hack the apps for WebOS with "patches" because they're just JS/HTML5 text files, except the new native apps. :) )

    Really, although Android has Linux, among the Linux-based phone OSs, it is probably the most closed.

  12. Re:Happened to my wife... by smash · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, if the design of the device allows itself to brick due to a failed download, then perhaps HTC or google SHOULD wear the cost. Totally different issue to requiring the firmware update - your issue is that the android update process on your HTC phone is broken.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  13. I didn't update and I have internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I received text messages last week warning of the cutoff and forced update.

    I called Saturday afternoon and politely asked the CSR if I'd receive any consideration for running an unaffected 1.6 ROM and have made a few 911 calls. Apparently the guy made a note. I asked for his name and ID number and hung up. Next day neither of the phones had internet, so I called up and sang the same song to the this CSR; he insisted that I had to update, I explained that I'm not affected and being asked to install an earlier revision of the ROM is hardly an update. He said all he could do is "reset the phone" when we hung up. He asked me to restart my phone when we hung up and when I did, my 3G signal was back and has been back since.

    I've been getting texts to update, though.

  14. Re:They do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The iPhone 3G is not a GSM-only phone. It is a GSM/UMTS phone.

  15. I stand corrected by Wolfier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thanks for letting me know Rogers is no longer the GSM monopoly here. Here is some more background information and more of my opinions below.

    The bug was, when GPS is turned on, calls to 911 can crash the phone. This bug was fixed in Android 1.6 and subsequent releases, which came out months ago. However, Rogers stated that there'd be no 1.6 updates to their customers (contrary to what Magic users in other countries can do).

    Data for all Dream/Magic users went down on Sunday, and will remain down until the update is applied. The reason for data shut down is that, apart from shutting down GPS, which a carrier cannot do remotely, shutting down data is also a work-around for the 911 call issue - so, this way it's guaranteed that 911 calls will always succeed from the moment they activated the block, thus, covering their ass from potential lawsuits.

    What's on the update:
    1. The 911/GPS crash fix in the main firmware.
    2. HTC's new Sense UI made for 1.5.
    3. New radio firmware
    4. New bootloader firmware

    #1 is the only necessary part to fix the 911 issue. #2 is of dubious usefulness to users, especially if it requires a full backup, that Rogers claimed can be done with "3rd party software" - but the software that can fully back the phone up are all root-user-only. How ironic.

    #3 and #4 are out of pure user control so customers can no longer unlock or root or run custom firmware. I have no complaint if it's for subsidised phones. However, unsubsidised phones (i.e. those we have paid a full price to buy) are also forced to update, even for people who run custom firmware that *already* has the 911 issue fixed.

    So we're given 2 carrots (911 fix and Sense UI) and 2 big sticks (useless control freak firmware updates).

    My opinion is, they could have rolled out a fix sooner - if a lone hacker can do it in his spare time, I'm sure a major wireless carrier can do it - the sooner the better, because there are people whose life might be at risk.

    Instead, Rogers probably spent a lot of time testing the unnecessary parts of the fix (Radio firmware and Bootloader), and also testing their totally useless "add-ons" (branding, partner bookmarks, unremovable links to Rogers Shop, "Ringback", Ringtone purchases, etc.) - without wasting time testing these unnecessary parts that provide negative values to their customers, especially those using unsubsidised phones, I imagine they could have rolled out the fix sooner - even for only ONE day, and putting less of our lives in danger. In my opinion, it's putting profits higher than customer safety.

    They say they cannot support rooted phones, but people are not asking for support. They're only asking to get the service they have paid for - "service" meaning usable bandwidth. Somehow these carriers or some backwards-thinking PHB inside still think they can provide something more than bandwidth, and forcing these extra "services" to unsubsidised phones somehow seem to have a priority even when customer safety is at stake.

  16. More discussion on the Android E911 bug by scdeimos · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's more info and discussion over here regarding the Android 1.5 firmware and the E911 bug...

    Rogers HTC E911 GPS Bug Update

  17. Re:Concealing device id/type/abilities? by litui · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, they legally can't in Canada.

    From http://techreview.eatuniverse.net/2010/01/24/rogers-disconnects-data-services-to-g1-users/ :

    "Some of you may recall legal precedence for this kind of issue, dating waaay back to the 70’s when Bell (then Northern Telecom) tried to force its customers to use Bell branded phones, and tried to attach a special fee to modem/fax use. The courts ruled against Bell, and the CRTC jumped in and made all sorts of rules to prevent telecom’s from requiring proprietary hardware, on standardized networks. This does, legally, carry over to GSM carriers. GSM is GSM. If your phone supports GSM on the frequency of a carrier, the carrier must provide a signal. Period."

    --
    I send you this message in order to have your advice.
  18. Re:How ironic by Aceticon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My experience too.

    I live in Europe (UK at the moment) and took my (unlocked) GSM phone to Canada when I went on vacations there. Since I was going to be there for almost a month, I bought a SIM card from Rogers to use in Canada and avoid roaming costs.

    My experience:
    - A Pay-As-You-Ggo (i.e. no contract) SIM is ridiculously expensive (C$50 with no included minutes). For comparisson sake, £35 (about C$60) in the UK with no contract gets me a SIM card, a mobile network dongle (really!) and includes £15 in credit (and the UK is hardly the cheapest mobile phone market in Europe, in Holland I got a SIM card for 5 EUR).
    - In Canada you pay to receive calls (wtf!)
    - Top-ups expire after a while: in other words, you load money into the phone and if you don't use it before a set deadline date then Rogers just takes it away.
    - Making calls does cost about 2/3 of what it costs in the UK. Again, please note that the UK is far from the cheapest mobile market in Europe.
    - Checking your voicemail is free in the UK but costs money with Rogers in Canada.

    To top it all up, they assigned me a mobile number which was re-used from somebody else and came subscribed to some "pay-to-receive one SMS joke a day" scam - this required a call to Rogers support where they first tried to deny all responsability and finally relented and repayed the money taken from my account only after I got angry, mentioned that number re-use was not my choice - their problem not mine - and mentioned something about "deceitfull sales practices" and that maybe it should be escalated to the local regulatory entities. I had to demand a block be put on all SMSs to that number to avoid further such issues.

    All in all I'm happy this was only for a month and I don't see how you Canadians take it.