Slashdot Mirror


Using Windows 7 RC? Pay Up Or Auto Shutdown Warned

CWmike writes with a warning that free preview copies of Windows 7 in the wild will start nagging users to pay up in a couple of weeks until ultimately shutting down the PC altogether in a month. "Microsoft unveiled the schedule for Windows 7 Release Candidate's retirement in May 2009, when it issued the early look to the public. At the time, it said Windows 7 RC would expire June 1, 2010. Before that date, however, users are to receive warnings of the impending end. Starting on Feb. 15, Windows 7 RC will display notices every few hours that the machine will periodically shut down beginning on March 1. As of March 1, PCs running Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours. Those shutdowns will come without warning."

57 of 430 comments (clear)

  1. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    BFD. You didn't pay for it, and it's Microsoft. What do you expect?

    1. Re:Really? by pwnies · · Score: 5, Funny

      I expected chairs to be thrown at me.

    2. Re:Really? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What surprises me more is that people are still using the RC. Why would anyone do that? I've seen 7 on my dads alienware(*) laptop. Frankly, I wasn't impressed. Feels like Vista, but a bit faster. XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig. At least it doesn't feel sluggish, but on an i7 I wouldn't expect that.

      (*) My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad ;-)

    3. Re:Really? by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, I think that if I'm told a beta is going to be valid until June, I wouldn't expect harassment 3 months before that time.

    4. Re:Really? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What surprises me more is that people are still using the RC. Why would anyone do that? I've seen 7 on my dads alienware(*) laptop. Frankly, I wasn't impressed. Feels like Vista, but a bit faster. XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig. At least it doesn't feel sluggish, but on an i7 I wouldn't expect that.

      (*) My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad ;-)

      Not unusual. I do the same thing. It's a sore PITA to keep replacing computers - if you go white box, figuring out what parts you want in it is practically a full time job. If you go OEM, well, then you get stuck with parts you aren't happy with.

      I gave up, and still run my nearly 10-year-old Celeron 533A (overclocked to 800MHz, back when it was the normal thing to do). I did pick up a couple of better computers along the way - a Mac Pro and a nice Core 2 Extreme laptop, but my old PC still runs fine. Especially since these days, any decent PC will last a really long time if you exclude gaming. CPUs aren't getting much faster quickly, ditto video cards... so even moderate gaming will work on decent high-end machines for years to come.

      Really, I don't know who came up with the idea that PCs should be replaced annually or even every two years or so. Moving all that data gets to be a huge chore, as is having to dig up all your installation CDs and setup programs and registration keys, and other crap. If you're well organized, it's easy. But most people aren't, and most people don't backup at all. And I have a small pile of hard drives I've removed from old PCs that may have unrecovered data.

      As for Windows 7 RC, it's actually a great solution to two problems. First are those who sold PCs with "Windows 7" prior to release to notify people they don't have a legitimate copy anymore. The second problem is when a PC gets installed with Windows 7 to evaluate, and is promptly forgotten about or even inventoried that it has Win7 RC. Well, hopefully when people get around to seeing that machine again, they'll realize that machine really ought to be re-imaged.

    5. Re:Really? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good luck finding drivers... That's the whole problem.

    6. Re:Really? by sopssa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you just couldn't read a few words more to understand the whole thing and that it starts to shutdown every two hours on March? The original warning about that wasn't that it works until June, it was that on March it starts to shutdown every two hours, and finally on June it will stop booting. That's three months for you to take your files and settings and update. Stop being so freaking difficult.

      I know it's the usual thing to badmouth MS on slashdot, but everyone knew it was going to expire and you would need to update.

    7. Re:Really? by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CPUs aren't getting much faster quickly, ditto video cards [...]

      Actually, they are, it's just that typical requirements are plateauing.

      Really, I don't know who came up with the idea that PCs should be replaced annually or even every two years or so.

      No-one outside of enthusiasts does this. Businesses typically work on a 3-5 year cycle, and home users frequently even longer.

    8. Re:Really? by ajlisows · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably not typical, but a friend of mine is still running the RC. Why? Here was the situation. His laptop was acting up last summer. Constantly shutting down. I told him I would reload it for him. It came with Vista. I backed his stuff up, wiped his partition clean, and started installing Vista from scratch. It simply wouldn't finish installing. I tried several times with the same result (and no, I'm not so stupid that I don't know how to install Windows). I thought it was probably a hard drive or RAM problem so I ran some tests on those. No problems. I don't remember who the manufacturer is but they did not have XP drivers on their site for that model. For kicks I tried installing the Windows 7 RC. Perfect.

      So...I gave the laptop back to him and I told him when Windows 7 actually came out we would have to do something about it. It hasn't been high priority until now, especially because he says the computer is working better now than it ever has. Of course, he won't be too happy when if it starts shutting down. Thanks for the reminder, Slashdot. ;)

    9. Re:Really? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After all that registration and setup work, turns out my wife likes Win7 but "hates" the new ribbon interface of Office2007 and wanted Office97 back. I can't find my Office97 CD, so I installed the latest Open Office hoping they didn't do the ribbon interface thing. OOO-Calc still offers a more familiar drop-down interface to my veteran Excel user than the new Excel. Hopefully OOO-Calc will leave the interface fairly stable as it moves forward.

      Office 2007 is some kind of sick joke like Vista. Particularly as Open Office is free and seems to open Word documents just fine. Like you I used Office 97 for ages but I don't have the CD to hand anymore. The machine I'm typing this on has Office 2007 on it but it's so irritating I used OOO instead.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  2. Without warning? by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uh, it's going to notify you... ...that's warning.

    1. Re:Without warning? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, the warning will start Feb 15h, and Microsoft doesn't release security updates for the Windows 7 RC code, so we're ALL better off to see these machines change to a different OS. The previews of Windows 7 were aimed at a tech savvy audience and hence I do not see any issue... except typical Slashdot "LOL M$ SUX WHATEVER IT DOES" bullshit.

      --
      This space for rent.
    2. Re:Without warning? by RobVB · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's also the giant Windows and Microsoft logos everywhere. If that doesn't alarm you...

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    3. Re:Without warning? by street+struttin' · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh, it's going to notify you... ...that's warning.

      Yes, but it will notify you without warning.

  3. ..so? by monoi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless they're also going to disable booting an Ubuntu install DVD, I don't see how anyone could have a problem with this. Windows is a commercial product. If you don't want to pay for it, use one of the entirely credible free alternatives.

    1. Re:..so? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, it's our M$ bashing article of the day, I've been waiting all day for a nice 'M$' bash post full of venom and vitriole, please don't rain on the parade! LOL M$ SUX!

      --
      This space for rent.
    2. Re:..so? by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Windows is a commercial product.

      Exactly right. Bootleg Windows is the #1 competition to Linux. So if ya want to bring about "The Year of the Linux Desktop" helping Microsoft turn the screws on unlicensed installs is probably the most productive thing a non-coder can do. Especially outside the US.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:..so? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I haven't finished bashing Apple yet!

      NOTE: Since multitasking is disabled in iPhone/iPad, I can only bash one evil empire at a time.

    4. Re:..so? by mikerubin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Windows 35?

      --
      I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
    5. Re:..so? by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the first one is always free.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:..so? by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Three stories the geek will studiously ignore:

      We don't ignore them, we understand them to be unimportant. Please take your astroturf campaign somewhere people won't call you out and laugh.

      > Microsoft revealed that it had sold over 60 million Windows 7 licenses through the second quarter.

      So what? Just means that after a couple of YEARS of pent up demand because of the Vista fiasco retailers had a decent Xmas selling season for PCs despite the generally crappy economy. Almost none of those 7 licenses were actual retail sales in the normal meaning of the word. Yes, we all understand the Microsoft tax still exists despite multiple consent decrees so every PC sale is also a Windows sale. But those would have been Vista sales a year ago and XP before that. Hell, about half the netbooks this Xmas were still XP. And to be able to show a increase in revenue they had to jack the OEM pricing on 7 oretty steep. That is a longterm opportunity for the Penguin Army.

      > Apple's Aug. 28 release of its Snow Leopard...

      Meh. At least most Apple users DO upgrade when a new OS ships instead of waiting for their next system purchase to get it rammed down their throat whether they want/like it or not. But Apple is just a niche player and their business model requires them to remain a niche player. Unlike His Steveness who only aspires to be a cult leader, we want "World Domination"

      > For the last day in January Windows 7 Breaks 10% in Daily Tracking.

      You say that like you guys in Redmond are proud of it or something. It is a sign of a saturated market. Odds are over half of that 10% was people getting a new machine for Xmas because the penetration numbers for 7 before that was still fairly small. Compare and contrast to Win95's release and deployment rate. That was a product people really wanted enough to suffer through the pain of upgrading.

      Windows 7 (Professional 64bit) is actually pretty good, I got it forcefed on a new laptop (but it runs F12 99% of the time) and it mostly works. Both W7 and Fedora screw up some aspects of hot docking, each failing to deal with the external display having a different resolution in different ways. W7 blows up Firefox; every launch throws three error dialogs before settling down and running. F12 instead throws the abrt-tool every time FF closes. Meh, a pox on em all. Bottom line, after seeing W7 it is OK as far as Windows goes. I ordered the XP restore disc just in case I decided W7 blows goats but didn't end up using it. Would I upgrade a working Windows XP PC to it? Why? I can't answer that question and I'd bet you can't either. Since Vista has had some service pack love I'm not even certain I'd recommend spending good money taking an otherwise working Vista install up to 7.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    7. Re:..so? by aldld · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That actually kinda sounds like something a drug dealer would say.

      Try it for free and get hooked?

    8. Re:..so? by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Wait, so which is it now? Is it:

      > a) Vista was crap, and now people are falling over themselves to buy a windows 7, or a PC with windows 7, or
      > b) Almost all of windows 7 sales were involuntary, and not a product of demand

      I'll try one more time to explain it.

      1. Vista was considered to be crap. EVERYBODY was saying it, the NYT, CNN, everybody. I never messed with it a lot but the one machine I put the RC on worked just fine. Sluggish though and it was an Athlon64. But regardless of fact, perception is everything once a meme sets in and Vista == suck was accepted wisdom.

      2. No significant numbers of customers have bought upgrades since the Win9x era because upgrades are painful and almost always end up in a wipe and fresh load. An upgrade also normally requires tossing hardware without drivers. Thus now they buy a PC and it comes with an operating system. When they replace that PC it usually comes with a new OS.

      3. Enterprise and SMB customers were (and still are) offered the option of getting XP but retail choices were 1) Vista, 2) Mac, 3) postpone purchase.

      4. Macs are expensive and don't run any of a user's existing software.

      5. Facts 1-4 caused customers to put off replacing their PC in droves, fearing getting stuck with "the suckage that is Vista."

      6. The buzz around Windows 7 started telling people it "didn't suck like Vista." Again it didn't even have to be true, only that be become common wisdom.

      7. Millions of people who had put off buying a new PC came back to the stores and bought a new faster PC since the Vista nightmare was finally over. But note that sales weren't through the roof even with the pent up demand.

      Bottom line, people don't run out in any significant numbers and buy based on the OS but they will avoid buying a new PC if one of the components is considered to be crap. Imagine if every PC offered at a decent price had one of those old Conner Bigfoot hard drives after you figured out they were crap. You would wait until the stores got in new models. Well Vista was kinda like that.

      > Anyway, however which way you slice it, it's a win for Microsoft and a loss for Linux. It doesn't help Linux for you to deny this.

      Do you really think the only shot Linux had was the window of opportunity while Microsoft was pushing Vista? We made most of our gains against XP. All we have to do is keep the quality up and make small but constant gains. Eventually we will get close to Mac OS at which point we will instantly become the 2nd OS since we run on commodity hardware. After that Apple dies (really doubt they could maintain their mystique and profit margins as #3) and we are the only competition left standing. From there we should be able to get into double digits, especially if we can get any traction from the ARM smartbooks and tablets. Then the battle begins.

      > Face it: people are using windows 7, and by and large, they are satisfied with it.

      I wouldn't dispute that, it is part of the argument I just made, see point 6 above. However, what I am saying is if they have XP or Vista SP2 they are also pretty satisfied and will only be upgrading the XP installs because much of the hardware hosting those installs is getting long in the tooth. Quick! Name me ten must have applications that only run on Windows 7. Ok, how about name ten that won't run on XP. Remember, people buy PCs to do things and if XP can watch YouTube videos and post to twitter most folks are happy campers. And Firefox on any current Linux can also do those things. If the iron wall keeping preloads out of retail channels is ever broken all hell will be set loose on Microsoft's balance sheet. Note also that 'enough' computer to do those things is quickly approaching the cost of a Windows 7 license. (Starter excluded)

      > No matter how it's deployed, 10% of the huge PC market is extremely large.

      Not really. Windows 7 has been on sale through one Xmas. About one in ten PCs in active service rolling

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  4. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This should not be a surprise to anyone. Why is this news?

  5. Nostalgia! by pwnies · · Score: 4, Funny

    PCs running Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours. Those shutdowns will come without warning

    The periodic shutdowns aren't actually part of the trial restrictions. They're built in to celebrate the 10th anniversary of windows ME

  6. Every two hours, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's still a pretty good stability improvement over WindowsME.

  7. Feature or Bug? by Joucifer · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...will automatically shut down every two hours. Those shutdowns will come without warning." My office computer already does this.

  8. Re:What's different? by matazar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm going to assume you are trying for a joke here. In either case, you are doing something wrong.

  9. That is probably their main target by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People who've forgotten or being lazy. Not only do they want your cash, but supporting prerelease software is a recipe for problems. They'd like to phase it out and not patch it.

  10. I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /. by anomnomnomymous · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice post there: Completely devoid of any bias towards Microsoft/Windows...

    Ok, let me turn off my sarcasm-mode first.

    So why the negative article about this? All the users knew beforehand that the free trial would end one day: Saying that it's "nagging" the user to pay up, is nothing more than using some fine choice of words to make it look bad on Microsoft.
    Seriously, there's lots of other stuff that you can slack MS for, and you have to do it for this?
    Also, you got to love the 'it will shutdown without a warning'... but it warns you from the 15th of February...

    Next up: Adobe nags the users after one month of using their trial software. Oh, the horror!

    --
    When you shoot a mime, do you use a silencer?
  11. What service.... by jameskojiro · · Score: 5, Funny

    What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it?

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:What service.... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 5, Funny
      What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it?

      The service is Windows, and you disable it by installing Ubuntu.

      (You must be new here).

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  12. Re:obligatory .... by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know this is Slashdot and all, but I've been running Windows 7 right from the public beta, through RC and final, and it never once bluescreened on me and all shutdowns were for updates or manual restarts.

    --
    This space for rent.
  13. Re:What's different? by swanzilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see where you are going there...

    In all honesty, when was the last time you saw a BSOD? I have been running XP at work with 100% uptime for years, and for quite a while kept a Vista dual-boot for streaming media at home with no issues. At least tout the merits of something superior w/o resorting to tired anti M$ rhetoric.

  14. Ask Slashdot: by countertrolling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you expect people to get upset over this? What, are they expecting it to just keep on going? My copy never got out of the virtual box. It's just there to figure out how to learn WTF. Come March.. or February, or whenever, whoopee! 25gb freed up.. for the hacked copy.. just kidding. No name, home made boxes with XP are a booming business right now. 7 is still a giant kludge. It's like Microsoft wants people to switch. Seems to be working.. Lots more Macs in my neighborhood.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  15. Windows 7 networking woes by HycoWhit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Count me as one of the people seeing the nag screens... Installed Ultimate edition 32-bit, have a license of Professional 64-bit. So at some point I am going to have reload the OS. Just not sure it if will be Win 7 Pro-64 or back to XP.

    Biggest problem with Windows 7 has been the network performance. On a gigabyte network I can not get better than 100mbs performance, while the Linux and XP machines perform as expected. To make matters worse, the network appears to spike and disconnect itself at random times. Streaming a video from the Windows 7 machine and surfing the web will produce stutters. Talked with a buddy that is a a major account TAM--apparently the networking issue has been well known since the RC and affects nVidia and Intel chipsets. My question to him--so what chipsets does that leave unaffected?

    I really tried to like Windows 7 but the more I try to like the more I find thinking Ubuntu is the way to go...

    1. Re:Windows 7 networking woes by HycoWhit · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going with my fault for installing Windows 7 in the first place...

      The same hardware performs as expected under XP and Linux (SuSe, rPath, and Ubuntu), so folks can draw their own conclusions.

  16. So what? by markdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what? Are there people stupid enough to think that a demo version of any software will run forever without nagging and shutting down, or going into limp mode? This is a completely stupid article totally unworthy of being posted on Slashdot.

    If you want a legal, free, [modern] OS without nagging or shutting down, install Linux, BSD, or OpenSolaris. Otherwise, pay up or shut up!

  17. Win 7 RC was good by microbee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had used it since last May until last December when I bought a discounted ultimate version for $30. The RC had almost everything the final version had, and it was nice for me to be able to try it out before paying for it (and finding a deal). I have no complaint for something that was free for half a year and as high quality as the official version

  18. Slashdot moderation flaws by heffrey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a truly lame story. The biggest flaw with the moderation system is that I can't use my mod points to moderate on the actual stories as well as the comments!

  19. It's a good thing. by recoiledsnake · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the RC doesn't get any updates, less vulnerable boxes in the wild is always good for all of us. Why is this being spun as a bad thing?

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:It's a good thing. by Malc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know why this is even a story. It's a total waste of bandwidth. This shutdown is part of the deal of using the RC. Maybe there are people out there who downloaded it off bittorrent without realising it was limited, but then that's their own stupid fault.

  20. Re:I run Windows 7 RC by recoiledsnake · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you could update from the RC to the final I would.

    It was explicitly stated during the RC process that it may not be upgradeable to the final version. Anyway, I have updated it and it works fine for me and most. Here's how http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/3075/how-to-upgrade-the-windows-7-rc-to-rtm/

    Backup everything and try it before a fresh install.

    --
    This space for rent.
  21. Re:What's different? by Sowelu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only time my computer's ever crashed since I installed XP was when my secondary drive suffered a head crash. I'm sure someone will tell me that Linux could have kept running, because hey, it wasn't even the root drive. But I can't say I really care.

  22. Re:I run Windows 7 RC by radish · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't need to download anything from Steam, just copy the files. There are instructions on their site.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  23. Re:I run Windows 7 RC by cpt_drewbie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Steam alone is probably going to take all week to get everything re-downloaded.

    Just as an fyi: So long as you preserve the Steam directory, you shouldn't need to reinstall any of the games as far as I know. The last few times I have formatted, all I need to do is possibly reinstall the steam client itself and all of my previously installed games have worked fine afterward. It's one reason I tend to get games on Steam now instead of elsewhere if they're released at the same time.

  24. Re:Oh wow! by recoiledsnake · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, Paint has a ribbon interface now! That alone is worth top dollar! : )

    --
    This space for rent.
  25. Re:Oh wow! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I get to pay ...

    You don't. You are free to take your money elsewhere - say, to Apple - or keep them to yourself and install some free Linux distro.

    Of course, you might want to ask yourself why so many people are willing to fork out the cash for an "operating system that consistently breaks". Perhaps your last Windows experience, circa 2001 (a scarred WinME user?), is a tad outdated, don't you think?

  26. Hi, I'm a PC by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    and random restarts of Windows 7 was my idea!

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Hi, I'm a PC by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Funny

      ``and random restarts of Windows 7 was my idea!''

      Does this satisfy your need? Windows 7 in 7 Screenshots.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  27. we can do that... by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Interesting
    While the moderation system is screwed up (and the metamoderation even more so), you may have missed something when you said

    The biggest flaw with the moderation system is that I can't use my mod points to moderate on the actual stories as well as the comments!

    That is what the Firehose is (supposed to be) for. You can go to the firehose, set it to show you upcoming stories, and then vote them down if you think they aren't worthy. And if you see stories in the firehose that deserve attention but are not scoring high enough for the front page, you can vote them up at the same time.

    And then in proud slashdot tradition, all those votes will be discarded and they will do whatever they feel like (or whatever makes the most money).

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  28. Normal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rebooting every few hours, then not booting at all? Many Windows users will just think this is normal.

  29. Windows 7 Wiped My Drive Clean by zeroRenegade · · Score: 2, Informative

    After I installed windows 7 ultimate it completely wiped my drive which had windows 7 RC, and installed some bloody system files.

    I foolishly was using the drive as storage at the time. One of the worst losses I've been hit with.

    I had disconnected all other drives during the actual install of windows 7 ultimate (since windows is infamous for altering boot sectors), and I did not reconnect the other drives until many startups afterwards. Still it managed to completely wipe the drive without me even noticing until a day later.

    It could have been much worse. Thank God windows does not understand the ext fs.

  30. Re:time... by louden+obscure · · Score: 2, Funny

    no problem, itsa toyota with a push button tranny and a sorta sticky gas pedal...

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  31. Re:Wait a minute... by Zorque · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm assuming you haven't used Windows since 98, because my Vista box gets regular heavy usage and has been on for close to 2 months now. I really only have to restart it when I do major updates or on the off chance that some third-party program crashes it.

  32. Oh for the love of........ by jaronc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Isn't this story perhaps a little hysterical? When the RC came out they were very clear that this would happen, they even gave the dates. They were also very clear you may not be able to upgrade from the RC.

    Now it's about to happen and people are surprised? People agreed to help test an RC and in return they got almost a years worth of free use out of a fairly stable OS. Trials over, pay up.

  33. Re:I run Windows 7 RC by war4peace · · Score: 2

    So you made fun of your girlfriend by installing an operating system which was specificaly designed with the following in mind:
    1. Would cease working after the cut-off time
    2. Should NOT be installed on any sort of "production" machines (it's a RC after all)
    3. Would not be officially upgradeable to the W7 final
    And now you're complaining of all of the above.
    It's like buying fresh milk and whining it went bad 4 days later. you had been warned. What did you expect?
    If you have a legit purchase, google for the installation workaround. Worked fine in my case. I too had Windows 7 Beta installed on a "production" machine, but was fully aware of the risks and managed to upgrade to final version with ease. But whining about its limitations never crossed my mind.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)