Slashdot Mirror


Israeli Scientists Freeze Water By Warming It

ccktech writes "As reported by NPR and Chemistry world, the journal Science has a paper by David Ehre, Etay Lavert, Meir Lahav, and Igor Lubomirsky [note: abstract online; payment required to read the full paper] of Israel's Weizmann Institute, who have figured out a way to freeze pure water by warming it up. The trick is that pure water has different freezing points depending on the electrical charge of the surface it resides on. They found out that a negatively charged surface causes water to freeze at a lower temperature than a positively charged surface. By putting water on the pyroelectric material Lithium Tantalate, which has a negative charge when cooler but a positive change when warmer; water would remain a liquid down to -17 degrees C., and then freeze when the substrate and water were warmed up and the charge changed to positive, where water freezes at -7 degrees C."

46 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. I could be stupid by PakProtector · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But I was expecting something along the lines of "Researchers manage to make water freeze at greater than 0C," instead of "Researchers manage to make water freeze below normal freezing temperature."

    Haven't they ever heard of salt? Or Anti-freeze?

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:I could be stupid by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I thought pure water doesn't go solid, not until an impurity starts crystal formation that turns the water into a solid?

    2. Re:I could be stupid by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Salt and anti-freeze just have typical freezing-point depression; there's no way to use them to produce a situation where water that is a stable liquid at one temperature will turn solid if you increase the temperature. The situation in this experiment is that water that's liquid at -17 C will freeze as you head it up towards -7 C.

    3. Re:I could be stupid by Ardeaem · · Score: 4, Informative

      You missed the point. The neat thing is that water was liquid, and then they WARMED it, and it froze. It is just a gimmick, but it's not just that they managed to get it to freeze at a temperature below 0C. It's that, due to the interaction between temperature, charge, and the freezing point, they reversed the normal COLD-WARM SOLID-LIQUID order.

    4. Re:I could be stupid by ortholattice · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You missed the point. The neat thing is that water was liquid, and then they WARMED it, and it froze. [...] they reversed the normal COLD-WARM SOLID-LIQUID order.

      In this supercooled water experiment video, notice that the supercooled water freezes after the bottle is tapped. So energy is put into it, meaning that it is warmed up slightly. Isn't this also reversing the cold-warm solid-liquid order?

    5. Re:I could be stupid by Linzer · · Score: 5, Informative

      I thought pure water doesn't go solid, not until an impurity starts crystal formation that turns the water into a solid?

      In many cases, the surface of the container has defects which can play that role.

      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
    6. Re:I could be stupid by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But it wasn't really a difference in the water, it was a difference in the container around the water. That is a well known phenomenon with airborn freezing temperature water, that it freezes on impact instead of while traveling through (clean) air.

    7. Re:I could be stupid by pj81381 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I thought pure water doesn't go solid, not until an impurity starts crystal formation that turns the water into a solid?

      This comment seems really unintuitive so I looked around a little. Ice can actually form entirely without crystallization, by cooling it to ~137 C in a matter of milliseconds. The article also mentions that "pure water, in the absence of any nucleating surface, can remain in a supercooled liquid state down to temperatures as low as -40C". I guess that means that pure water will begin crystallizing at this temperature anyway.

    8. Re:I could be stupid by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, liquid water already contains quite a lot of tetrahedral "crystalline" structures floating around amongst the other molecules. So it really shouldn't need anything external to crystallize around... it already has some of its own.

    9. Re:I could be stupid by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So that's why my car gets covered in an inch-thick sheet of perfectly clear ice. That's always bothered me, thanks!

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    10. Re:I could be stupid by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly, this is well known, and is the difference between homogeneous nucleation caused by the massive undercooling providing the energy to nucleate ice spontaneously versus heterogeneous nucleation which requires much less free energy and occurs dependent on surfaces.

      It is not scientifically interesting that they warmed it to get it to freeze, that's just a comparison of freezing points... it's interesting that the charge of the surface modified the freezing/nucleation point. Frankly, I am amazed that this was published in Science; it seems like worthwhile research, but for a journal more like, say... applied physics letters or a more specific interest journal. Kudos to the researchers for managing to spin it as a general-interest paper when it is in fact a fairly simple observation of an obscure phenomena.

    11. Re:I could be stupid by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This could lead to a way to make ice cream without salt. They've managed to lower the freezing point of water without having to put any chemicals in the actual water itself.

    12. Re:I could be stupid by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you can replicate it yourself, leave a water bottle out in the garage when it's about 20 F out. take it inside and smack it against your hand, if the temperature is right you can watch the ice form. it works even better with non-carbonated flavored waters.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    13. Re:I could be stupid by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is recent research. I believe you can find the article on Ars Technica right now.

    14. Re:I could be stupid by BillX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, and if you pull a certain amount of vacuum on it, you can get water to do all of boil, liquefy and freeze at the same temperature. This is even without applying mechanical energy or kinky fields (electrostatic or magnetic) to coerce its behavior.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  2. Applications? by paskie · · Score: 3

    That does sound really cool, even as a fundamental research, but are there some cool real-world applications I'm not thinking of?

    --
    It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Applications? by kamochan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apply that weird surface to generate the weird behaviour, and use it to power a Stirling engine.

    2. Re:Applications? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      but are there some cool real-world applications I'm not thinking of?

      A pyroelectric lithium tantalate ice cube tray? In animal shapes?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Applications? by aBaldrich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are scientists, not engineers.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
  3. Progress by brettz9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not quite Hell, but it's an impressive step in that direction...

  4. Overflow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    By reading the title only, I thought the overflow-bug of water was finally found.

  5. Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't remember the science story yesterday Physicists Discover How To Teleport Energy being called Japanese Physicists Discover How To Teleport Energy. Is the fact these scientists are Israeli title worthy?

    1. Re:Israeli Scientists by Spad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously Chemists are more nationalistic than Physicists...

    2. Re:Israeli Scientists by aysa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't remember that stories about Italian/Japanese/German/British/French/Canadian scientists were ever questioned for mentioning the country of origin. Is the fact these scientists are Israeli disturbing you?

    3. Re:Israeli Scientists by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't find it particularly disturbing. I was pointing out the examples for the opposite reason--- to suggest that "[Nationality] Scientists" is not a particularly unusual phrase, contrary to the claims of the poster I was replying to.

    4. Re:Israeli Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait until you see tommorow's story: American Slashdot Editors Add Superfluous Words When The Title is too Small.

    5. Re:Israeli Scientists by Shohat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, we don't appreciate Apple products over here.

    6. Re:Israeli Scientists by jschen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Modded very funny, but with some element of truth. The grandest experiments in physics often require significant international collaborations and highly specialized instrumentation (think Large Hadron Collider) that demand large-scale pooling of resources. On the other hand, at least at this time, there really are no projects with such requirements in chemistry. Sure, there are many vibrant chemistry collaborations, but not nearly of that scope. So you can easily end up working only with people nearby, competing with a similarly capable team in another country (or in the same building). There are plenty of interesting problems in chemistry where a single person or a small group could produce a significant breakthrough through the creative design and execution of simple experiments using readily available equipment and chemicals.

  6. Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;-)) by ls671 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I put a beer in the freezer too long but not that long, when I take it out of the freezer, I can see it is pretty 100% liquid inside the bottle. Now, taking it out of the freezer makes it warmer and opening it even warmer due to air circulation inside the bottle.

    Well, when I open it, it turns to ice so I make my beer freeze by making it warmer so nothing new here ;--))))

    Very seriously, I swear this is true but I understand it could be due to other factors that the ones described in TFA like pressure inside the bottle but I thought it would interesting to mention anyway.

    Haven't anybody else seen their beer freeze in their hand while opening it just after it has been in the freezer although it was in a liquid state when they actually took it out of the freezer ?

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  7. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by spydum · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's an old bar trick. It has to do with the co2 being released on pressure change. Nothing like the science these folks have described.

  8. That's nothing. by Timosch · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of these guys managed to turn water into wine 2000 years ago...

  9. Ah, I see you are an american by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Funny

    You clearly must be an American, since you compare beer to water. Over here in the old world, we know there is a difference by the taste for one.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, your typical Budweiser is roughly around 3.4% alcohol by volume, which is quite weak. In the days before and during Prohibition it would have been scoffed at and called "Near Beer", made for kids. But it is that way today because of post-Prohibition laws that restricted beer to lower alcohol levels. In some states that is. For some reason around 3.3-3.4% was a fairly common level when it came to such laws.

      My state used to have some weird laws carried over from those days. They have changed somewhat since. But until pretty recently, (1) it was illegal to show alcohol content on bottles, cans, or their packaging. (2) Beer bought in regular stores was limited to 3.4% alcohol by volume. But you could get beer or ale of higher alcohol content at a state liquor store.

      That led to some strange situations. For example, you could get Rainier Ale in the store, at 3.4%, and at the liquor store at about 9% if I remember. But because of the law, there was no indication of strength on the cans, which all had identical green and gold printing. So people made some pretty major mistakes now and then.

      Fortunately the laws here have become somewhat more reasonable, but a typical domestic mass-produced lager in most of the U.S. is still usually around 3.4%. It's getting better, though, with all the smaller breweries that have started up.

    2. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Dragoniz3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only is it not particularly hoppy, it has a pretty significant rice content. If anything, bud is hop-flavored rice alcohol. This being said, it's still my favorite mass market beer.

    3. Re:Ah, I see you are an american by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only is it not particularly hoppy, it has a pretty significant rice content. If anything, bud is hop-flavored rice alcohol. This being said, it's still my favorite mass market beer.

      Yes, we live in a cultural backwater as far as beer is concerned. In Mexico the cheap regular beer is some of the best on the planet.

      --
      Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  10. So that's Frozone's trick! by wisebabo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He must be negatively charged (thus keeping water a liquid on or in him) and then the moment he "releases" it, it freezes!

    Could there be some sort of industrial application for this, like ice-making where you have a jet of "liquid" water (because it is kept in a negatively charged apparatus) but upon contact with something, loses its charge and freezes? How about rapid construction of ice sculptures? Just like spray on concrete.

    I even seem to remember someone in WWII proposing making giant pontoons/floating islands out of ice and hay.

    How about in Antarctica/on Mars using it for rapid construction of ice domes? Once it solidifies it won't melt.

    1. Re:So that's Frozone's trick! by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 2, Informative

      There has been quite a bit of work put into different 'icecretes', as a matter of fact. Here are a few examples, although I'm sure there's more that I'm not even aware of:

      http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/31-70/Ch6.htm
      Skip down to para 6-8.c and 6-10.b

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pykrete and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Habakkuk

      http://pisces.hilo.hawaii.edu/documents/VT-NIA-PISCESFinalReport.pdf
      A *very* interesting paper on using lunar regolith icecrete for construction (among other topics)

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  11. Re:Dowsing by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Funny

    A dowser was working Down Under
    when his failure caused him to ponder
    "the charge on me watta
    was more than it oughta.
    So I couldn't tell lightning from thunder."

  12. Re:Let me get this straight by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So first they cool it to -17 degree and it remains a liquid, then they warm it up to -7 degree and it freezes. That's like traveling from Greenwich to the Arctic via Antarctica and then call it a scientific discovery that one can actually reach the Arctic by going south, right?

    No, it's more like the realization that Canada is south of Detroit.

  13. Re:Contrary to what kids think by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think he was referring to the fact that it tastes like fizzy water with beer-like flavour, not the alcohol content. And Budweiser tastes pretty darned watery, even compared against other beers of the same type. Ales usually have a heavier taste to them, so it's not really fair to compare Budweiser against something like Guiness or Caledonian in terms of flavour. It is, however, fair to compare it against a good lager like Pilsner Urquell. Even when you compare it against a shitty lager, like Labatt Blue (which is also a pilsner, like Budweiser), Budweiser comes out on the bottom.

    (and no, I'm not saying that Canadian beer sucks, just that some of the most popular Canadian beers suck. Namely, Labatt and Molson. If you want a good Canadian beer, try something like Steam Whistle, or Wellington. We don't export the good stuff. Similarly, I think the Australians are smart enough to export the shitty beers and keep the good stuff for themselves, as are the Dutch... think about that when you order a Fosters or a Heineken.)

  14. Are they calling it Ice-Nine? by ibirman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, water ice that is stable at a higher temperature than liquid water? Can anyone say ice-9?

  15. Re:Anti-freeze by jfengel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tantalum is non-toxic, but you know it doesn't really work like that. Sodium is explosive; chlorine is toxic; sodium chloride is tasty.

    Still, as you say, lithium tantalate is going to be far too expensive for coating pipes.

  16. Whut? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sounds like it freezes due to the change in charge, not because the water warms up. It's freezing in *spite* of the water warming. It's like they are just chasing the freezing point around.

    You get the same effect when opening a highly chilled bottle of soda. It starts to freeze due to the release of carbonation, although the pressure change might come into play as well.

  17. Re:Nothing new I have noticed this with my beer ;- by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Informative

    When you open it COs is released this causes the pressure to fall.

            pV = nRT

    So you did in fact cool it by opening it.

    You could also supercool it I guess and shaking it a little when taking it out causes it to crystallize - but I'm having doubts about beer and beer bottles being pure enough to not crystallize out in the first place.

  18. More to the point: by Gription · · Score: 2

    Water needs to reach the correct temperature and then have something trigger the phase transition.

    In other words:
    The crystallization has to start somewhere. Imperfections in the surface or impurities supply this. If you have very pure water and a "perfect" container, the lack of a starting point for crystallization can delay the phase transition by quite a bit.
    (Then you get YouTube videos showing flash freezing of water bottles!/i))