Slashdot Mirror


Plasma Jets Could Replace Dental Drills

Hugh Pickens writes "The first electric dental drill was patented in 1875; modern drills grind the diseased portions of teeth away at up to 500,000 rpm. But dentists have been seeking less invasive ways of wiping out stubborn, tooth-decaying bacteria. Now Live Science reports that bacteria-killing jets of plasma could soon replace the drills used to treat cavities in our teeth. Researchers recently demonstrated that a small, blowtorch-like device emitting a relatively cool beam of purple plasma could eliminate oral bacteria in cavities, leaving more tooth structure intact than a drill does. To test how well 'cold' plasma jets (about 100F or 38C) sterilize tooth material, researchers took slices of dentin from extracted human molars, doused them with bacteria, and torched them with the plasma jet. An inspection via a scanning electron microscope of the damage done to the germs shows bacterial remnants had holes in their cell walls. When the plasma jet fires, it charges oxygen in the surrounding air, creating highly reactive molecules that can break down the bacteria's defenses. Researchers believe the technique could be available to general dentistry in three to five years."

131 comments

  1. Guys, I need this ASAP by dushkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Researchers believe the technique could be available to general dentistry in three to five years."

    COME ON, guys, my appointment is on the 22nd. Hurry!

    --
    o hai
    1. Re:Guys, I need this ASAP by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Even if it works, it doesn't need to show up at your dentist. Carisolv apparently worked, too, and yet our teeth still get drilled.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Guys, I need this ASAP by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Don't rush them or the first models will emit an ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmminous hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Guys, I need this ASAP by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      It also has to be safe, affordable, and the worst obstacle will be getting it past the bureaucrats who "approve" medical devices.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    4. Re:Guys, I need this ASAP by Antidamage · · Score: 1

      Speaking of hums, I've been seeing a laser dentist.

      I absolutely hate injections and drills, but he was able to do my fillings with no pain, no discomfort, no injections or painkillers. I highly recommend them. I'd never go back to a tooth-grinder again.

    5. Re:Guys, I need this ASAP by Starayo · · Score: 1

      There's a "laser dentistry" place down the road from me. I considered it because it sounds awesome.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:Guys, I need this ASAP by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      There's a "laser dentistry" place down the road from me. I considered it because it sounds awesome.

      I've seen Space Mutiny, so it sounds hilarious.

    7. Re:Guys, I need this ASAP by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  2. right... by iamagloworm · · Score: 1

    so i just need to manage no cavities for another 5 years. it's been 6 since i saw a dentist. i can do this. come on!

    1. Re:right... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 5, Informative

      For cavities' sake, get checked. I skipped going to the dentist for years because I'd never had cavities, until I went and the guy found 3 :/

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    2. Re:right... by laughing_badger · · Score: 4, Informative

      For oral cancers sake, get checked at least once per year. At that rate, they are usually treatable.

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
    3. Re:right... by deniable · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had my first fillings almost four years ago and the dentist had already stopped using drills. Mine were shallow so he used a mini sand-blaster. Mouth was full of grit after but better than the stories I've heard about drills. He said for deeper work they use a laser.

    4. Re:right... by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

      He said for deeper work they use a laser.

      That sounds awesome, but I'm a bit confused: how do they fit the whole shark inside your mouth?

    5. Re:right... by GaryOlson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Genetically modified pico-sharks, you ninny.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    6. Re:right... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The drills really aren't that bad, assuming that the dentist doesn't botch it. No new technology can be expected to solve poor technique or accidents.

    7. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This reminds of the following classic AI koan:

      ---

      In the days when Sussman was a novice, Minsky once came to him as he sat hacking at the PDP-6.

      "What are you doing?" asked Minsky.

      "I am training a randomly wired neural net to play Tic-Tac-Toe."

      "Why is the net wired randomly?" asked Minsky.

      "I do not want it to have any preconceptions of how to play."

      Minsky shut his eyes.

      "Why do you close your eyes?" Sussman asked his teacher.

      "So the room will be empty."

      At that moment, Sussman was enlightened.

    8. Re:right... by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The drills really aren't that bad, assuming that the dentist doesn't botch it. No new technology can be expected to solve poor technique or accidents.

      Actually, the way I understood this is that plasma is used to disinfect the dentin, instead of mechanically drilling away the infected part. So there is less potential for mechanical damage as well. Some drilling is probably necessary to remove the mechanically decayed part, but there is less need to remove extra layers just in case.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    9. Re:right... by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      My problem with the drill isn't so much the touch factor (vibration)...it's the secondary factors, like the smell and the noise. Those can't be addressed with technique on the part of the driller.

    10. Re:right... by algormortis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dentists in the US sometimes lie for money. I remember when I went to one in Florida, and he said he had "found" a cavity and wanted to charge a ridiculous amount to fill it. Not even a week later, a relative of mine in New York checked my teeth (yes, she was a dentist) and said I didn't have any cavities.

    11. Re:right... by aurispector · · Score: 5, Informative

      Looks like yet another solution looking for a problem. The point of the drilling is to remove infected dentin and leave healthy dentin intact. When teeth decay it's a process in which bacteria are demineralizing and destroying the hard structures of the tooth. Simply killing the bacteria is not sufficient to restore the damaged structures; the damaged structures themselves must be removed, along with any undamaged structures that have been undermined by decay. Additionally, if disinfection were the only goal the decay would still need to be exposed via drilling in order to effect disinfection. As much as people hate the drills, they also provide tactile feedback as to the location of decay. Hard tissue lasers are extremely expensive relative to the drills and provide no such feedback. Visual inspection is often insufficient to determine the quality of the dentin which is why we are always poking with those sharp little explorers. Another issue is being able to determine whether or not the bacteria have all been killed. Leaving infected dentin behind means the decay will simple continue from that point. Removing all of the softened, infected dentin is necessary to prevent recurrence of decay. Incidentally, traditional dental amalgam fillings (mercury, silver and tin) are inherently somewhat antibacterial. The metal tends to inhibit bacterial growth providing a small measure of protection to recurrence. However preventative measures like good daily diet and hygiene (e.g. cutting out the sugar and brushing/flossing) is still the best means of preserving your teeth.

      Other methods of disinfection have been tried and failed, hence "drill and fill" remains the most reliable method of restoration.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    12. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a dentist, I can comment here with some degree of authority on the subject. If a tooth has cavitated, in other words, the surface has broken, the dentin part you speak of being disinfected is a mushy mess. Even if the plasma could "disinfect" this area, the tooth would be left with a spongy core, incapable of supporting the remaining hard structure of the tooth. One of the fundamental parts of preparing a tooth is to not leave any unsupported enamel. If "infected" dentin is left, albeit bacteria free, the chance for tooth fracture is great.

      I do think that this technology would work in early caries removal, such as shallow lesions. Often you don't know how deep a carious lesion will go until you open things up and start excavating decay out. At some point you will have to use some sort of mechanical process to scoop the decayed material out, either a hand instrument or a slower speed bur.

      Now if you are concerned about the trade-off between exposing the pulp (nerve) and needing a root canal, or leaving a thin layer of carious dentin, this plasma approach may be good. It has been shown in research that a small layer of decay left under the proper filling, can repair itself and if small enough no root canal therapy may be necessary. The plasma may help out in disinfecting this area and help out the repair process. But I digress...

    13. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she were being sloppy because you weren't a paying customer. Get proof, like a photo of the cavity or whatever.

    14. Re:right... by budgenator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Different clinicians practice to different standards and use differing treatment standards and different diagnostic methods. A dentist using the older standard probe and X-ray technique will miss more, using new digital radiography and new diagnostic aids more will be found. Many small caries can remain sub-clinical for decades or even unmineralized and get smaller or they can grow explosively. Sometimes the "caries" are caused by physical traumas like abfraction due to bruxism, clenching and other parafunctional habits. Unfortunately there can be differences based on economic considerations as well.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    15. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the guy found 3 :/

      He found a frog that was being teabagged?

    16. Re:right... by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      How about earplugs and noseplugs?

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    17. Re:right... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Pfft, that's nothing. My dentist tells me that I have soft enamel passed down from my parents, so I regularly developed cavities throughout late high school and college. One time, between my regular six-month visits, I managed to develop 5 cavities. The most frustrating thing for me was the fact that I managed to develop them despite regular brushing with prescription toothpaste, flossing, and rinsing with prescription mouthwash, all while abstaining entirely from non-diet soft drinks at the request of my dentist. I'd go in every six months and get berated by my dentist for not taking proper care of my teeth every time she found another two cavities here or three cavities there. I probably got at least 8-12 drilled out during those years, despite all of my efforts.

      Of course, that's not the end of the story. In a wonderful twist of irony, I finally reached the breaking point and gave up on a lot of the prescription stuff and taking good care of my teeth, since I was frustrated with the costs and efforts involved that seemed to be yielding no results...and I haven't had a cavity since. The dentist keeps commending me on how well I'm taking care of my teeth nowadays, compared to how I used to take care of them. If only she knew...

    18. Re:right... by Ivan+Stepaniuk · · Score: 1

      I am a laser service engineer. Hard and soft tissue lasers become more and more cheap over the years, you can get a 400mJ Erbium YAG laser for less than 30.000 USD. A lot of my customers (dentists) agree that laser will be quite in every dentist office in less than ten years, at least here in Europe. Plasma jets are however still on the blackboard.

      --
      My other signature is a car
    19. Re:right... by ichthyoboy · · Score: 1
    20. Re:right... by beguyld · · Score: 1

      Likely because all the antiseptics killed the normal "good bacteria" in your mouth. Very much like our skin and intestines, there are bacteria which is supposed to be there.

      If you want to find out more about teeth vs general health. Look up Weston Price's (a dentist) world-wide research for an eye-opener about dental (and general) health:
      http://www.westonaprice.org/Nutrition-and-Physical-Degeneration-by-Weston-A.-Price.html

    21. Re:right... by beguyld · · Score: 1

      How about earplugs and noseplugs?

      Bone makes a very good conductor of sound vibrations right to your ear. Smell maybe, though you'll still taste it, which might be much of what is actually happening anyway.

    22. Re:right... by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      You cannot taste if you cannot smell. I have gotten to the point where the dentist is actually pleasant, even when drilling and doing all manner of things in my mouth, because I don't resist it. Kind of a zen thing. If I explained it you would not get it. LOL

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    23. Re:right... by beguyld · · Score: 1

      I have gotten to the point where the dentist is actually pleasant, even when drilling and doing all manner of things in my mouth, because I don't resist it. Kind of a zen thing. If I explained it you would not get it. LOL

      Ah, you're assuming I'm a typical "intellect as religion" geek. I'm not. Not by a very, very long ways...

      My comment wasn't to imply what you thought. It was a response to the idea of resistance through blunting the senses. I didn't try to communicate what you're saying though. I don't try that sort of thing very often here. Non-resistance is one thing. Actively seeking out abuse is something else entirely... :)

    24. Re:right... by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Maybe the context of dentist as threatening abuser is what has you suffer. :-) Whatever serves you, brother!
      I was not assuming what you thought. As usual, our resistance is all about us and not the thing we resist. LOL

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    25. Re:right... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The shark doesn't have to be in your mouth, it just has to have good aim.

  3. Home use? by MartinSchou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Would this kind of device be useful in the bathroom? Probably not as a replacement for flossing or brushing, but fighting plaque build-ups in places you can't really get?

    1. Re:Home use? by diskofish · · Score: 2, Informative

      This already exists. It's called a water jet.

    2. Re:Home use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not sure I'd want to drill my own teeth.

    3. Re:Home use? by dushkin · · Score: 1

      Self dentistry is a perfectly viable option.

      --
      o hai
    4. Re:Home use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have more info about this?

      You probably don't mean http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_jet_cutter or do you?

    5. Re:Home use? by cvtan · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'f tried. No it ishn't.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    6. Re:Home use? by basotl · · Score: 1

      A Waterpik is a popular brand of them. http://www.waterpik.com/oral-health/

      --
      HTC EVO 4G LTE w/ CM 10.2 | NookColor w/ CM 10.2 | Samsung Epic 4G w/ CM 10.1
    7. Re:Home use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how much hair you have down there.

    8. Re:Home use? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:Home use? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      but fighting plaque build-ups in places you can't really get?

      Chew some xylitol gum instead. It tricks the plaque's metabolism into thinking its digesting sugar and effectively starves them. It's better to kill off the bacteria than to try to repair damage (one theory of the mechanism of action for fluoride is it assists with enamel remineralization). I half-started a list of products I've found to be of decent quality here. I should get back to that with some good recipes I've worked out too...

      A bit cheaper than a home intra-oral plasma torch and more portable.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:Home use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next up, Plasma Razors!

      Shave with refreshing cool plasma! Watch the ladies enjoy the silky nature of plasma shaved skin.

      Buy now, only 3 payments of $19.95

    11. Re:Home use? by giorgist · · Score: 1

      Well amm ...
      Now that was the funnyest comment I can remember ...

    12. Re:Home use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this kind of device be useful in the bathroom?

      I wouldn't want to use it in place of a bidet.

    13. Re:Home use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got to be bogus, my dentist has been using a micro sand blasting tool for almost a decade. I thing it sprays baking soda. I don't even need anesthetic when it's used. Was used on both my kids when they were little and works great.

  4. This can't possibly help dentist suicide rates. by korney · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This can't possibly help dentist suicide rates.

    1. Re:This can't possibly help dentist suicide rates. by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      Actually I would think anything that greatly reduces the chance of a dentist visit resulting in painful drilling would eventually work to counter the stigma associated with the profession, and maybe alleviate the "everyone hates coming to see me" depression.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    2. Re:This can't possibly help dentist suicide rates. by NotOverHere · · Score: 1

      ...chance of a dentist visit resulting in painful drilling...

      But where would Steve Martin get more material for a musical performance?

  5. Hard coating? by swb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always wondered why they haven't developed a hard coating for teeth that would prevent most cavities and why we don't have vaccination against caries and periodontal pathogens.

    It often seems like the basics of dentistry have changed little. There are newer materials for crowns and tooth-colored fillings, CNC machines and 3d modeling for crowns, but AFAIK going to the dentist is little different for me now than it was 40 years ago.

    I sometimes wonder if advances in preventive dentistry aren't limited by the structure and practice of dentistry itself. Plus, dentists being dentists, they have a built-in interest in high-quality preventive care (high-frequency flossing, rinses, brushing, etc) and thus themselves develop few of the chronic problems that plague the general public and thus don't devote resources to better passive preventive systems/technologies as they believe the ones available are "good enough".

    In a way it kind of reminds me of the problems non-technology people have with computers that technology people don't suffer from; these issues don't really get addressed within technology itself very aggressively because to the people who don't have these issues, they aren't considered serious problems or are considered side effects of other problems (general ignorance or lack of intelligence, etc).

    1. Re:Hard coating? by vadim_t · · Score: 4, Informative

      It exists: Dental sealant

    2. Re:Hard coating? by cntThnkofAname · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have dental sealant, and it's no where near as good as natural enamel. I believe swb is getting at something that is better, that doesn't suffer from decay like enamel. The dental sealant that I have wears of every 3 to 4 years which results in mind numbing tingling sensation from exposed tooth nerve.

    3. Re:Hard coating? by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In a way it kind of reminds me of the problems non-technology people have with computers that technology people don't suffer from; these issues don't really get addressed within technology itself very aggressively because to the people who don't have these issues, they aren't considered serious problems or are considered side effects of other problems (general ignorance or lack of intelligence, etc).

      Actually, forgot to say, the solution to this exists, it's known as a "console", or a "cell phone". I mean purpose limited machines, where all running code is either heavily sandboxed, or manually vetted by some party.

      On general purpose machines such tactics are much less successful, because users actively fight such measures. At some point the user runs into a conflict between that they want to do something that the firewall/permissions/etc don't want to allow. And in such a case the security system is never seen as a good thing, and actively fought, disabled and worked around. Even if what the user wants to do is a seriously bad idea.

      It's like trying to protect somebody who insists on that yes, they really want to cut the branch they're sitting on, and if their tool prevents committing suicide they get another that doesn't.

    4. Re:Hard coating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's nice in that it works to some degree. But it only protects the exposed part of the tooth.

      If you're a regular sugary bevarage drinker, all it takes is that one errant bit of popcorn, tortilla chips, or beef jerky between the teeth to let the soda do it's work below the gum line. If you're not a good enough flosser the effect happens much faster. You'll find yourself with the problem of an otherwise normal looking intact tooth - but with a cavity that forms just below the gumline. And who knows what gunk gets trapped there if you can't manage to scrape it out. So the effectiveness of the sealant is not quite as good as you'd think it should be.

      In a way, I wish there was a way to re-seed teeth and trigger the horomone process that causes baby-teeth to fall out. (But with defective or damaged adult teeth.) That may still be a few years down the road though. (I suspect this will happen sometime after aging treatment technology gets better, since human teeth haven't really evolved for going much past 40 or 50 with fairly casual maintenance.)

      But until then, something that may cause less pain than drilling is a start.

    5. Re:Hard coating? by Spatial · · Score: 4, Interesting

      why we don't have vaccination against caries

      Last I heard, one is currently in human trials. It works by replacing the bacteria responsible with a different strain that doesn't create lactic acid, and therefore doesn't cause caries.

      In tests on rats, it provided a permanent solution. Here's hoping it works out for us too.

    6. Re:Hard coating? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      A few questions remain, though: Are these new bacteria especially hardy? We still need to brush our teeth to avoid calculus buildup and bad breath and auch a replacement therapy isn't very useful if a few brushings kill off enough of them for traditional caries bacteria to take hold again.

      I expect the answer to be negative, though - they'll probably see no problem in you having to get a complete mouth disinfection and bacteria placement therapy once a year. Then again, if it's cheap enough (USA)/covered by standard health insurance (everywhere else) I'm fine with it.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    7. Re:Hard coating? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have dental sealant, and it's no where near as good as natural enamel.

      Last time I talked to a Dentist on a related subject, he told me that that's by design - better that your natural teeth wear on the sealant/crown/whatever than that the sealant/crown/whatever be hard enough to cause wear on your remaining natural enamel.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:Hard coating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some places in Stockholm where they now use lasers to drill the holes instead of mechanical drilling. It is pretty much painless. Did it last year, and have another appointment in a few weeks. It costs a bit more, but I'd recommend it.

    9. Re:Hard coating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, that is +500 informative, thanks.

    10. Re:Hard coating? by LtGordon · · Score: 4, Funny

      We still need to brush our teeth to avoid calculus buildup and bad breath

      Rationally speaking, brushing a minima of three times a day is integral to good oral hygeine.
      rimshot();

    11. Re:Hard coating? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Apparently they are genetically engineered to be dominant, and thus cause the naturally occurring bacteria to die off.

      I would love being able to brush less, i haven't found any toothpaste without a strong minty taste... A taste that wakes you up when you try to brush your teeth at night, and when you do it in the morning it leaves a strong taste in your mouth for hours that ruins any food/drink you try to consume.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:Hard coating? by izomiac · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a story that one of my organic chemistry professors told about the other. You see, he devised a compound that worked exactly like fluoride, but bound to teeth much more strongly. He'd verified that it worked as intended in his lab and sent a batch off to the medical school for animal testing. Well, a few weeks later he received a call about the experiment.

      "I have some good news and some bad news..."
      "Well, what's the good news?"
      "We've been feeding the rats a diet of pure sucrose and not a single one has a cavity."
      "That's great! What's the bad news?"
      "Well, we'd like to have your permission to go ahead and euthanize them, they're all dying horrible deaths."


      At this point the professor goes ghost white and rushes home. A few days later my other professor inquires about why he did that. It turns out that he was so confident in his invention that he'd been brushing his own teeth with the stuff! A long story short, it turns out that arsenic was used in one of the synthesis steps, and he'd failed to remove all of it from the final product.

    13. Re:Hard coating? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Tom's of Maine makes a strawberry flavored kid's toothpaste. It was a little weird using a non-minty toothpaste. You could also try making your own toothpaste and giving it whatever flavor you like.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    14. Re:Hard coating? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I believe there have already been successes with stem cell-based teeth regrowing.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    15. Re:Hard coating? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      /. had an article about regrowing teeth in rodents. Alas, that is like 10 years off.

      I want glow-in-the dark teeth:)

    16. Re:Hard coating? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      On general purpose machines such tactics are much less successful, because users actively fight such measures. At some point the user runs into a conflict between that they want to do something that the firewall/permissions/etc don't want to allow. And in such a case the security system is never seen as a good thing, and actively fought, disabled and worked around. Even if what the user wants to do is a seriously bad idea.

      You know, I just one a several-day fight against Windows 7 insisting that 60 Hz is good enough for everyone on a CRT. It took extracting the EDID information on my display, manually tweaking it to hide the 60 Hz modes, turning the edited EDID to an INF, and finally installing said INF as a driver to prevent fullscreen applications (mainly games) from choosing modes that make my eyes bleed. Getting Ati Tray Tools working with Windows 7 - they aren't signed, and don't like UAC - is another fight I've decided to give up on.

      What I'm saying is, automation and safeguards are nice, but they should always be bypassable just by responding "yes" to a warning prompt. If I want to disable some display modes (or add more), let me. If I want to load an unsigned kernel driver, let me. If you don't let me, it simply makes solving the problem even harder.

      When automation makes your users reminisce about XFree86's modelines with longing, you've suffered epic failing.

      For anyone interested, here is a link to the 17-step procedure to prevent Windows from lowering the refresh rate to eye-bleeding level when display modes are changed. In step 4, simply disable the "standard timing" modes that have low refresh rates, and change the minimum rate to your liking. User-friendly, eh ?-)

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    17. Re:Hard coating? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is, automation and safeguards are nice, but they should always be bypassable just by responding "yes" to a warning prompt.

      It's been tried, doesn't work well for a large amount of people. Ever seen how "normal people" use their computer? Warning pops up "Do you want to install the RootKit ActiveX from l33th4x0rs.com?". Typical user doesn't even read it, clicks OK, keeps on browsing as if nothing happened. If you ask them what they did and why they'll go "Huh?". Because that's what they normally do: when a dialog box pops up they click "Ok" regardless of what it says (without even reading in fact), then go back to what they were doing.

      That's because lots of things ask trivial questions, or questions the users don't know how to answer, on a daily basis. So people get used to getting them out of the way as fast as possible.

    18. Re:Hard coating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are basically two different types of oral bacteria. one that decays your teeth and one that doesn't. i believe there are trials going on testing the idea of essentially replacing the type that decays your teeth with the type that does not.

    19. Re:Hard coating? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      It's been tried, doesn't work well for a large amount of people. Ever seen how "normal people" use their computer? Warning pops up "Do you want to install the RootKit ActiveX from l33th4x0rs.com?". Typical user doesn't even read it, clicks OK, keeps on browsing as if nothing happened.

      I'm talking about making configuration changes, not browsing the web. A typical user isn't going to screw around with the config settings, so he isn't going to be harmed by being able to set things up the way he wants.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    20. Re:Hard coating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are effective preventive measures but it would require serious changes in lifestyle.

      The role of diet in dental health has been extremely well documented in the work of Weston Price, a dentist who performed research on native diets. Weston Price travelled the world in the 1920-30's examining native diets of remote communities across the world just as they became exposed to the supposed 'benefits' of a modern diet. Price travelled extensively, from the Scottish isles, to isolated Alpine villages way in the mountains of Switzerland, to Eskimo and Intuit indians to the tropics of the south sea islands.

      Weston Price searched for the healthiest human specimens he could find. Remember, these were people who had no exposure to modern medicine, who did not have doctors, nurses, drugs or even an aspirin. What he found and recorded was the native diet and lifestyle of the most healthy people on the earth, and recorded their diet and its affect on their dental health.

      All of the people he studied had no professional dental treatment. Most had no toothbrushes. Many had never even seen a doctor. Despite not brushing twice a day with a fluoride toothpaste, and flossing one a day they managed to have perfectly formed dental arches and fantastic, healthy teeth with next to no cavities.

      Weston Price analyzed the common elements of these diets and concluded that the introduction of refined sugars and processed foods had an immediate and destructive impact on dental health.

      http://www.naturaldentists.co.uk/diet.html

    21. Re:Hard coating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they are unusually hardy. They have a gene which allows them to produce a tiny amount of an antibiotic, allowing them to dominate.

      http://oragenics.com/smart.html

  6. Great! by fysdt · · Score: 1

    Great! If this is a success... I might like going to the dentist :)
    Or maybe not..

  7. Just don't cross the streams by Trip6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It could unleash a whole evil dental underworld.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  8. Makes me wonder by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...researchers took slices of dentin from extracted human molars, doused them with bacteria, and torched them with the plasma jet.

    Do you ever wonder how they think up this stuff. Some researcher is sitting around drinking coffee thinking, "Hey, I wonder what would happen if you blasted a cavity with plasma?" How do you even think of questions like that without being stoned?

    Then I started wondering if I'm going to be hearing my dentist going, "Pew! Pew! Pew!"

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Makes me wonder by maxume · · Score: 1

      I would guess that you pretty much nailed it, except the guy was probably already obsessed with cavities and came across some information about low temperature plasma.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Makes me wonder by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they weren't stoned...?

      Speaking as a scientist, I think that's an untested hypothesis.

    3. Re:Makes me wonder by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      ...researchers took slices of dentin from extracted human molars, doused them with bacteria, and torched them with the plasma jet.

      Do you ever wonder how they think up this stuff. Some researcher is sitting around drinking coffee thinking, "Hey, I wonder what would happen if you blasted a cavity with plasma?" How do you even think of questions like that without being stoned?

      I just figure they get bored with tiny knives and needles and drills, and they want to take a tiny blowtorch to us now, those sadists ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Makes me wonder by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "How do you even think of questions like that without being stoned?"

      http://www.tsmhouston.com/images/plasma-cutting.jpg

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Makes me wonder by 10Neon · · Score: 1

      They probably read a paper on other medical applications of plasma jets, and thought, "hey, this could apply to my field".

      --
      The Guide is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    6. Re:Makes me wonder by budgenator · · Score: 1

      They used to pore molten lead at 622 degrees F into cavities preps.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    7. Re:Makes me wonder by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      "Hey, I wonder what would happen if you blasted a cavity with plasma?" How do you even think of questions like that without being stoned?

      I'm assuming the researcher in question happened to have a cool plasma torch and was looking for things to do with it. It's the same instinct that leads people who've learned a new programming language to reimplement some perfectly good existing piece of software for the umpteenth time just to use the language. If you could do dentistry with code, you can bet you'd see PyDrill and JDentures on Freshmeat.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    8. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUDE SWEET.

  9. Side effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the side effects? Irradiating my teeth... sounds dangerous. Great if it works though.

  10. This won't replace the drill. by rdmiller3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The drill isn't just for killing the bacteria inside cavities (called "caries" by dentists). The drill is used to make an undercut hole large enough to get stuffed with filling material. In doing so, it removes not only the bacteria but also the food-material that the bacteria was growing on. A plasma jet won't do either of those things, so they would still need to use a drill.

    1. Re:This won't replace the drill. by yanyan · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Not only that, drills are used for reshaping teeth, breaking up large impacted molars, chipping away dental cement, making waiting patients cringe, etc.

    2. Re:This won't replace the drill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "undercut" you refer to is often not necessary with modern composite restorative materials.
      They actually bind with the tooth structure rather than require the mechanical retention which was necessary when using amalgam.

      Admittedly the location of some caries requires a mechanically made access opening for full debridement.
      Root canal therapy may require mechanical access to the pulpal chamber.
      Some teeth can not be removed safely in one piece and have to be sectioned.
      Implants require a surgical removal of bone for proper placement of the integrated implant body.
      These tasks are currently done with a rotary handpiece driven by compressed air or nitrogen.

      Whether lasers or plasma jets or some unknown device will ever replace our handpieces (drills) remains speculation IMHO.

      -DDS

    3. Re:This won't replace the drill. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The drill is used to make an undercut hole large enough to get stuffed with filling material.

      I think the point is to kill the bacteria before they dissolve a hole big enough in your tooth to require filling. Then again I DNRTFA.
      The cleaning would proceed as usual.

      cavities (called "caries" by dentists).

      (And by the French.)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  11. Sorry, we're open! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://adsoftheworld.com/files/images/dunecdentistopen.jpg

  12. Not the only use by codeguy007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't the only use. I watched an interview with the guy who invented the cool plasma. It can be used to sterilize hands as well. You know the sterilization chamber from Star Trek, the one you enter with your clothes off after coming back from a planet and get eradiated. Well you can do that too with cool plasma.

    1. Re:Not the only use by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      ...after coming back from a planet and get eradiated.

      I read that as 'eradicated'
      NOT GOOD!

    2. Re:Not the only use by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Will it come with Jolene Blalock as an option?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    3. Re:Not the only use by xTantrum · · Score: 1

      I was about to comment on this. didn't /. have a story about this a while back, and one of the aplications was about dentistry among other things? anyone have a link to that original article?

      --
      $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
    4. Re:Not the only use by N3Roaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      That only happens if you somehow come back from a planet while wearing red.

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    5. Re:Not the only use by daveime · · Score: 1

      NO ONE wearing red ever returns from an away mission ... fundamental fact of the universe.

  13. 3-5 years? by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make you hate when xkcd is right at something.

  14. It sounds to me like by arcite · · Score: 1

    You have never had any serious dental work done. There are plenty of hi-tech advancements that didn't even exist 20 years ago.

    1. Re:It sounds to me like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have never had any serious dental work done

      I think his question is more along the lines of "Why haven't we advanced to the point where we never NEED any serious dental work done"

    2. Re:It sounds to me like by swb · · Score: 1

      Like what? I've had a root canal and 3 crowns and my wisdom teeth extracted in the last 2 years.

      I think some of the restorative technologies have gotten better (eg, implants, Cerac CNC-milled crowns) but the preventative technologies have not. Even stuff like wisdom tooth extraction doesn't seem very high tech.

      About the only thing I really appreciate is the ability to take the Halcion/Hydroxyazine/Nitrous cocktail before major work and blank out during the experience.

  15. 5 years? phew looks like its gonna happen by meow27 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://xkcd.com/678/

  16. Grounding clamp by vlm · · Score: 1

    Where does the grounding clamp attach?

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  17. We should've had them by now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /. had an article about very similar research about 4 years ago...

  18. In a very enthusiastic Billy Mays voice.... by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    it charges oxygen in the surrounding air

    . Wait, is oxi-clean.. plasma?

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  19. No 240Hz LED LCD could do that ! by AwaxSlashdot · · Score: 1

    Once again, plasma proves its technically superiority over LCD.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  20. Shakespeare by quotes · · Score: 1

    For there was never yet philosopher That could endure the toothache patiently.

  21. Holes in cell walls? Yay! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    An inspection via a scanning electron microscope of the damage done to the germs shows bacterial remnants had holes in their cell walls.

    I take from that, that it will also put holes it my cells’ walls.
    Do. Not. Want!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Holes in cell walls? Yay! by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I take it your dentist leaves everything completely intact when he uses a dental drill?

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    2. Re:Holes in cell walls? Yay! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I take from that, that it will also put holes it my cells' walls.

      multi-cellular organism WIN!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  22. plasma drill info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had my hands on a prototype.
    Bout 2 years ago.
    It's kinda a fun thing to do, and most
    curiositers can make one at home.

    The problem right now is that it requires
    tens of liters per minute of air, and 5Kv,
    so the physical dimensions are rather large.
    This instrument is considered a low energy ion
    generator, vs many high energy generators.
    ( ma vs 100's of amps )

    A big ballast is required because the
    physics of producing atmosphere plasma at 1 atm
    still is not completely understood. It's
    difficult to prevent arcing. As a matter
    of fact, that's a real reason for getting
    continued funding for that research. The "plasma"
    pencil can be produced with other physical
    constructs of the "gun". This is an
    excellent area for some budding physicist to
    pursue. Most white papers are about ionization
    in vacuum, or using radio frequency excitement.
    There are also now ways to generate ions
    on microstructures.

    The plasm will do things to various
    organic structures, but as pointed out will
    not remove the decay itself.

    The device ionizes the air, but the tip of
    the jet is intended to ionize a surface.
    A dentist would need no detector. But there
    are many other uses where the result would
    need to be determined usually with some ion
    detector. These are also easy to make.

    As a matter of fact, a plasma was considered for
    use in the ISS to sterilize interior structures.

    To get variants on a theme, use helium, or a
    helium/atmosphere mix ( 2% helium). The plasma
    mentioned was originally created with 5KV DC
    voltages but AC is much more generally preferred
    for things like ion cleaning devices, like air
    cleaners. As another interesting fact, the
    $300 air ionizers use 12KV and the breeze created
    is actually generated by the ion generation.
    There is no fan.

    The plasma ARE cool, and you can stick your hand
    right in the purple flame. Lots more info can be
    googled.

    1. Re:plasma drill info by daveime · · Score: 1

      The plasma IS cool, just like the water IS wet, and the fire IS hot.

      Mass Nouns are not plural.

    2. Re:plasma drill info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plasma ARE the plural of the plasm.

      The plasm will do things to various
      organic structures

    3. Re:plasma drill info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Plasm' is biology. This is physics. There is no such thing as "plasm" in this context. You are incorrect.

      Plasma IS ionized gas. The plural is plasmas, when dealing with set of different types. Just like the gas IS and the gases ARE. The liquid IS and the liquids ARE. The plasma IS and the plasmas ARE.

    4. Re:plasma drill info by daveime · · Score: 1

      At this point, I'm torn between Cartman's "he he he he he he" and Nelson Muntz's "haw haw".

  23. Standards of what is a cavity by spineboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently went after many years, and the dentist found three. I was a little suspicious, and asked the dentist about it. He said yes, due to advanced digital x-rays, cavities are spotted earlier. The more important fact was that he said with newer filling techniques and material, it allows them to fill smaller cavities. The older fillings didn't "take" that well in teeth, and so dentists had to let cavities grow largert, so they could fill them successfully. So the up to date, modern dentist will probably find these "mini-cavities" and fill them before it becomes a giant cavity.
    Why do this then? Well one of my older style fillings was in a tooth that was weak, which cracked in half, and I needed a root canal and crown. The newer mini-fillings will keep more of the tooth, preventing problems like that in the future.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Standards of what is a cavity by alcourt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just because they say there is a cavity doesn't mean there is one. A younger dentist insisted I had three cavities that needed filling. No x-rays, just based on the pressure test (where they push down on your teeth with a probe), where the dentist pushed down much harder than standards from several other dentists.

      I changed dentists. He used x-rays and the pressure test and concluded no cavities. I mentioned what the other dentist said and he said no, no evidence of even smaller cavities. Since I was a new patient to the new dentist, he did a full workup, not just a routine visit checkup. Several years later, still no evidence of these supposedly obvious cavities.

      Unfortunately, such fraud does occur. I don't know how common it is, but I am now convinced the one dentist was trying to invent work to justify excessive personal spending (she talked a lot about how much she'd spent on her home lately). I've seen enough guides to say that one of the best defenses against such fraud is to ask to see the pictures.

      No, I'm not a dentist, but one doesn't have to be a dentist to realize that sometimes, a professional will claim work needs to be done when there is no professional justification for that work. It happens in all fields. I'm suspicious of the "well, our standards and technology have improved" excuse. For some reason, the older the dentist, the more likely they are to be willing to show me pictures or justification of any advised work (dating all the way back to when I was a kid and advised to get braces).

      --
      "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend unto the death your right to say it." -- Voltaire
    2. Re:Standards of what is a cavity by algormortis · · Score: 1

      My experience was basically almost exactly like this, except neither dentist used X-Rays; just the probe. I still don't have any cavities, and it's been four years since that dentist said I had a cavity. Thanks for backing me up alcourt :)

  24. The bright shiny future. by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    This adds a whole new layer of meaning when your Dentist goes "Whoops!"

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  25. They're not all minty... by mbessey · · Score: 1

    A lot of toothpastes made for children are fruit-flavored, and Tom's of Maine (http://www.tomsofmaine.com) makes a few non-minty flavors. Also try your local natural foods store - they probably have some wacky flavors.

  26. Re:Hard coating? pssszt is it safe ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a global plot by liberterian dentists on God fearing merkins, who just want a perfect smile.

    They are waiting for the gene splicers to come up with the correct sequence to allow you to grow more than two sets of teeth. They wont bother filling then, just whisk the offender out.

    Think of of all the lovely loot they will make doing new comestic work on that tooth

  27. Vitamin D can help prevent tooth decay by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    It's been know since the 1930s:
        http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v05n03.shtml

    Treatment:
        http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/treatment.shtml

    This may be an especially big problem these days in pediatric dentistry, as kids spend more and more time indoors.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  28. the dentist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the dentist is the shark *with fricken lasers!

  29. You Can Trust LiveScience by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    After all, a full 70% of the top ten mysteries of the mind (according to them) actually had to do with the mind.

    In this little missive of theirs they make clear that we've all been mistaken thinking drills were for digging holes into materials like teeth, when all along they were intended for killing germs by digging holes into them.

    As for "creating highly reactive molecules that can break down the bacteria's defenses", you can buy a quart bottle of dental drills for a dollar or less. These drills go by the name "hydrogen peroxide".

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  30. I was shown the radiographs by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Ahh -that's the kicker.My dentist had a screen right next to the chair showing me where the carries were. Digital x-rays are quite nice, as the images can be blown up to show you where the problem lies. Mine was easy to spot.

    I concur - ask to see the images. If you're at all concerned, then get a second opinion. No one is holding you in that chair.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:I was shown the radiographs by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Digital x-rays are nothing more than a small sensor connected to a computer by USB. As a bonus, they use much less X-ray radiation than the old film.

      If your dentist isn't using this technology by now (mine has for almost 10 years), then you need to switch dentists. There's no reason to stick with someone who's too cheap or stubborn to get out of the dark ages of dentistry. Same goes for anyone using those horrible old mercury-filled fillings.

  31. I'm Rick James by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    How do you even think of questions like that without being stoned?

    Nitrous Oxide is a helluva drug.

  32. huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This cold plasma thing sounds awesome. I love the idea of killing bacteria with freakin' plasma, yet having the death of said bacteria having nothing to do with heat at all.

    I'm still worried, however, that operating such a device frequently could cause radiation-related problems to develop over time. Think: if plasma at such low temperatures is capable of causing such a reaction with bacteria, surely it is emitting much more radiation than you would expect.

    Keep in mind that blow-torches produce radiation. I don't understand exactly how, but even if the plasma torch is 100 degrees, how can such a thing be safe?

    I'm no scientist, but somehow being around a plasma torch for too long sounds potentially risky.

    Hey, who wants to stand in front of their microwave's ridiculous little wire mesh radiation shield and count the number of times the little dish rotates with its non-microwave emitting light turned on?

    HEY! WE HAVE TO BE ABLE TO SEE IN THERE!!