Today's Best CPUs Compared... To a Pentium 4
Dr. Damage writes "How do current $74 CPUs compare to the $133 ones? To exclusive $1K Extreme Editions? Interesting questions, but what if you took a five-year-old Pentium 4 at 3.8GHz and pitted it against today's CPUs in a slew of games and other applications? The results are eye-opening." Note that this voluminous comparison is presented over 18 pages with no single-page view in sight.
I'm at work, where I have a P4 winXP machine.
AND I'M PROUD OF IT.
o hai
Are games so lazily programmed that they don't take advantage of that either?
Obviously it's not exactly easy to make programs that can run either on multiple cpu's or a single one just as well.
Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
Goddamnit Dwarf Fortress. It could really, really use multiple cores to handle physics. A good enemy flooding system based on a dam and an artificial lake will hog the fastest CPU.
45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
Yeah, you're right, it's all really about having multiple threads in your soft. All these deadlocks, stravations and races blahs are just there to frighten kiddies!
"Or use Btrfs; ZFS isn't the only option with integrity checks."
Oh yeah, because nothing screams "reliable" like filesystem that is still in beta.
"People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress 2 both have options to use multiple cores. I believe that, when enabled, the other cores to "physics processing." My understanding is that "physics processing" is geek-speak for "making the bodies of your slain foes collapse into realistic piles of death as they hit the ground."
A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.