Slashdot Mirror


I Use Twitter, Please Rob Me

nk497 writes "Developers looking to prove a point about the information people are sharing on social networking sites have unveiled a new tool called Please Rob Me. It hunts out tweets from people who are also using location-based services telling the world that they're out of town, and then directs the world to go rob their house. The creators of the site said: 'Don't get us wrong, we love the whole location-aware thing. The information is very interesting and can be used to create some pretty awesome applications. However, the way in which people are stimulated to participate in sharing this information is less awesome.' How long until the first actual robbery takes place?"

67 of 403 comments (clear)

  1. Sweet! Free Stuff! by Nzimmer911 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank you Please Rob Me! My new LED TV is awesome!

    1. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank you Please Rob Me! My new LED TV is awesome!

      WILL ROB AGAIN!!!! A++++++

    2. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, thank you "Please Rob Me" _his_ LED TV really is awesome. Shouldn't have tweeted about the job you just did from the other side of town, dimwit. Expect a surprise when you get home...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if the "seller" will give you an equally positive rating?

      "Smooth, easy transaction. Didn't make too much of a mess. Very little damage to front door. Highly recommended!"

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Exitar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, thank you "Please Rob Me", your wife is really hot! Now I will never have to meet her in a motel again thank to this wonderful service!

    5. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by hippie-joel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only on Slashdot would this be voted "Insightful".

    6. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by wealthychef · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny, but seriously, this website is going about it all wrong. How about sending messages to those poor souls saying something like "Hey, you know you are making your location known to possibly unfriendly people?" Rushing right to publish the information to said villains is not the right thing to do, in fact, it's an attack in and of itself and frankly this website should be subject to a lawsuit or even criminal action, as its intent is not benign.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
  2. Release the lawyers.. by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..

    1. Re:Release the lawyers.. by discord5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..

      Sadly PleaseSueMe.com has already been taken, or they would've been able to set a new trend.

    2. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Idaho · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doubt it, since they obviously don't live in the USA. Good for them, then :)

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    3. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Idaho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Their names look very Dutch to me (I'm Dutch myself), so I'm guessing the Netherlands (or perhaps Belgium).

      You're probably right that "encouraging people to rob a specific person's house is actionable in every first world country". However, that's clearly not their stated intention - to the contrary, in fact.

      In the Netherlands, if someone would start a lawsuit about this (could happen, sure), I'm guessing chances are pretty good that the judge will buy the argument of the website authors, especially since burglars can already trivially find the exact same information if they have two half-working brain cells, and their stated purpose is to actually make people aware of this obvious problem. In addition, whoever starts the lawsuit would probably first have to prove actual damages (e.g. being robbed), and that this was caused by this website, and even then there's the obvious counterpoint that they put this information online themselves in the first place, and it might have been trivially found without that website. The apparent intention (of the website authors) matters as well, probably more so than in the USA (this is just a feeling, I may be wrong).

      So, it's hard to prove that a robbery was "caused" or "encouraged" by this website, even then it involved your own stupidity in putting that information publicly on the internet in the first place, therefore the chances of winning (as the person who got robbed) seem not that great. In addition to that, mostly everyone here has insurance covering their household effects, meaning they'd get (most of) the money back from an insurance company anyway, so why bother with the lawsuit.

      Finally, if you lose, you typically have to pay the legal costs of the defending side - so starting the lawsuit is not without financial risk in the first place.

      Much of this is probably also true in the USA, but the legal costs involved would be higher, and I somehow have a feeling, also the chances of losing. (IANAL, so I may be wrong about that.)

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
  3. "How long until the first actual robbery" by TheMeuge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This isn't news. People's houses are cleared out regularly due to their Facebook status.

    1. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And before facebook (or any other social networking stuff) there were the obituaries in the local paper...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      twitterererers(sp?)

      "twats", seriously - it so perfect

    3. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by jgtg32a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or Twits to be a bit more accurate

    4. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Arimus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or just forgetting to cancel the milk or the pile of post just inside the front door, or news papers you forgot to cancel etc etc etc.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    5. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Potor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most houses are empty between 9-5, MTWTrF.

    6. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which is why my facebook status is usually.....

      "hunkered down bwehind sandbags in view of the door. Itching to try out my new 10 gauge semiautomatic shotgun..."

      or

      " need to leave for supplies, I have claymore mines set up all over the house, I hope I dont trip one again when I come home and kill the new dog like last time."

      For some reason I dont get any visitors... even from friends.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Rary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or just forgetting to cancel the milk or the pile of post just inside the front door, or news papers you forgot to cancel etc etc etc.

      There is a bit of a difference between leaving signs that you're away visible to anyone who happens to be passing your home, and actually broadcasting that information on the internet. More to the point, people who might otherwise take precautions, like getting a friend to pick up their mail while they're away on vacation, end up broadcasting the fact that they're away to the whole net-connected world and think nothing of it.

      Of course, the detail that has been left out is that a Twitter search won't tell you if the alarm has been armed or if the three nasty rottweilers have been fed recently.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    8. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by swb · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Out shopping for a new aquariums for my rattlesnake collection. The last burglar knocked them over running from the German Shepherds. Don't look forward to finding all 10 snakes, either."

    9. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can heartily recommend Trursday as the best day for theivery, as it's often overlooked.

    10. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm. My new Facebook status:

      "New shotgun looks and shoots great, really rounds out collection. Staying home this week since winning another martial arts championship. The new Rotweiler gets along great with the Dobermans."

    11. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Rary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, the detail that has been left out is that a Twitter search won't tell you if the alarm has been armed or if the three nasty rottweilers have been fed recently.

      Neither will a pile of newspapers on the front porch.

      Actually, the pile of newspapers does at least suggest that there are no rottweilers. If there were, somebody would be in charge of feeding them and letting them outside to "do their business", and most likely that person would pick up the newspapers while they're at it.

      The newspapers don't, of course, tell you whether the alarm is armed, but of course there's always those stickers and signs that alarm companies put up all around your house when they install the alarm. The presence of signs/stickers suggests the alarm is probably armed (why wouldn't it be?), while a lack of signs/stickers suggests the alarm isn't armed (or even installed).

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    12. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't need to buy 'fake' stickers. There are plenty of stickers that don't have a specific companies name on them. This is because security systems are not generally made by the monitoring company. Companies like Brinks probably don't want you to realize that they just buy off the shelf equipment and then sell it at 1000% markup. Anyone interested should check out http://www.smarthome.com./ They sell the same stuff as the monitoring companies. They also have partnered with a monitoring company that will happily work with self installers. It is dramatically cheaper. Obviously, this is only advice for those that are comfortable setting up their own electronics. It isn't hard, but you do have to read the directions.

      For those those that just want the sticker, they can buy the stickers there too. There is nothing 'fake' about the stickers. Brinks and their like don't have a patent on putting a sticker on your window to say that you have a security system.

      That being said. Actual as I said, you are right, actual burglars have told me that 90% of an alarm's effectiveness is in the stickers.

  4. I for one... by Mashdar · · Score: 2, Funny

    welcome our new squatter neighbors.

  5. Everyone leaves their homes by Rurik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, physical security, you're away from your home. So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day. There's been a lot of backlash over this site, including Twitter suspending their account, which is just silly. It's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home. It's just that now they can see you over FourSquare (speaking of silly...). It's the same as posting on Twitter that you're stuck in traffic, or sending an email from a work-only address. Just another in a very, very long list of ways to see where you're currently at.

    Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.

    1. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, everyone leaves home, sometime. But, even a regular work schedule gets unexpected interruptions. People get sick, play hookie, take a personal day, etc. So, a would be thief can never be sure if you are there or not. Sure, they can setup camp outside and watch the house, that's a tried and true technique. But, you have to preselect your victim to do that and then exert some effort as well as risk being spotted while casing the joint.

      But, with people Twittering and Facebooking their whereabouts a perpetrator can simply search for whoever isn't home right now. If they decide to target an individual, they can do so from a distance with very little effort, no chance of being discovered while they stalk their target, and near certainty that the target is not home.

      You imply that these technologies are no greater threat than everyday real world threats. But, the truth is that these technologies allow the perpetrator to automate and vastly increase the efficiency of their "work". It is definitely a greater threat. You just lack vision.

    2. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I make it as difficult as my insurance company wants it to be.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Rary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is exactly the point. Computers didn't enter the workplace so that people could suddenly do things that they couldn't do before. Computers simply made those work activities more efficient and effective. The same is true for other uses of computers. Using computers in crime doesn't mean crimes occur where they couldn't before, just that the criminals are more efficient and effective.

      Besides, someone using old-fashioned casing techniques would assume that my house is empty right now because I normally leave for work at 6:45. However, someone using modern casing techniques (if I were a Twitter/Facebook/Foursquare user) would know that I'm working from home today.

      This kind of technology takes much of the risk out of burglarizing homes.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  6. poor thieves by f3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can also imagine guys tweeting as if they were on holidays, but being home-entrenched and armed to the teeth, just for the fun of shooting at thieves.

    1. Re:poor thieves by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pretty long odds for the itchy trigger finger set... They'd soon get bored waiting and try to sweeten the pot.

      12:00 - leaving 4 grandmas, back in 2 weeks
      16:00 - plenty of beer in the fridge for when I get back tho, hope it doesn't get skunky
      18:00 - crap, left my rolex on the nitestand
      21:00 - crap, wife left her diamonds
      22:00 - crap, left the keys in the door
      22:30 - crap, left the keys in the truck too
      22:45 - crap, told the neighbor some moving guys were coming by around midnight

    2. Re:poor thieves by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally I don't have a problem with this kind of thing. Really, I don't. Want to rob, consider it a hazardous conditions.

      I mean if someone wants to fuck with my stuff, then they have to fuck with me and my big guns. We shouldn't be protecting the asshats on the off chance that a drunk guy broken into my house accidentally, or it was a couple of stupid kids.

      Stupid should hurt. Criminals are stupid lazy asshats for the most part, who are antisocial to boot.

      I'm sick and tired of people who want to coddle the criminals while they are committing crimes. You breaking the law? Then you're responsible for what happens to you, and all that you do.

      Seriously, criminals shouldn't have rights while they are committing crimes.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:poor thieves by lwsimon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you were legal until 18:00 - then I think it qualifies as "hunting over bait".

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
  7. Just because you can... by 2obvious4u · · Score: 4, Insightful

    doesn't mean you should.

    It is one thing for unscrupulous behavior to happen, it is another to encourage it. Their motives may be "pure" in that they are trying to bring awareness about what people know about you and what "could" happen. That doesn't mean it should happen. Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks, it is better for everyone. There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them. Now the community is encouraging people to rob people. The issue isn't people sharing their information, its people like these guys who are just being ass holes. We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.

    1. Re:Just because you can... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.

      That would be a nice warm fuzzy world to live in, but the truth is that on this grossly overpopulated planet, we all HAVE to hide our personal information, because the world is just too full of asswipes to just pretend they don't exist.

    2. Re:Just because you can... by Jawn98685 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, this is definitely a case of "should". Clueless Twitter users (prepending "clueless" seems almost redundant...) who advertise to the world stuff that only a fool would advertise in any other medium need to have their noses rubbed in their own stupidity.

    3. Re:Just because you can... by cduffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't told Foursquare about my Twitter account, or about my Facebook account, or about anything else. I use it because some places I frequent offer discounts to customers who do; that's it.

      So -- by default, Foursquare can't talk to anything else; it's your friends who hook it up to Twitter and such who are being the asses.

  8. I don't understand the value of this to robbers by xZgf6xHx2uhoAj9D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty. But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows; they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.

  9. You can question their methods... by Ltap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But if this raises awareness, full steam ahead. People need to figure out that if they have minute-by-minute updates of where they are and what they are doing, all of which is publically available, they will sooner or later have consequences.

    Moreso than robberies: I'm surprised we don't have rapes because of this, i.e. a girl tweeting while drunk.

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    1. Re:You can question their methods... by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

      Moreso than robberies: I'm surprised we don't have rapes because of this, i.e. a girl tweeting while drunk.

      I'm sure I'll be condemned to insensitive robot hell for this, but when I read that, my first thought was:

      Q: What's the blonde mating call?
      A: I'm SOOOOOOOOOO wasted.

    2. Re:You can question their methods... by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Q: How does a blonde turn on the light after sex?
      A: she opens the door

  10. Re:really a good idea? by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    oh, ghod, no, please, not "twobbery" . It's enough to make one give up the English language.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. Re:The reverse side is: by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, you could give someone else your phone or laptop to tweet with, but then you'd have a hard time explaining that.

          Why? Is it suddenly illegal to lend someone in another state/country your telephone? Is there a law stating that everything you write on the internet must be "the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth"? You can't invite someone into your house and then bash them over the head in "self defense". However if they force entry, it really doesn't matter WHAT you wrote. IANAL but I assume that the law draws a line at the point where the guy actually takes a crowbar to your front door. "He made me do it" doesn't work. You can't take break into people's houses unless you have a damned good reason that will convince a judge and jury, like a firefighter trying to save someone's life or property.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  12. Re:really a good idea? by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Funny

    He wanks as high as any in Wome !!!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  13. Re:Honeypot by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives.

    Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  14. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by natehoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hear insurance companies quietly whispering about new schemes to monitor their customer's twitterfeeds and deny claims based on homeowner liability.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  15. What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Twitter that you're gon for the weekend - too bad, because you won't get to enjoy your new big-screen home theatre with media pc.
    2. Wait with loaded shotguns for robbers to break in.
    3. BOOM!BOOM!

    Profit? NRA endorsements, talk-show circuit, book deals ...

    1. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative
      You can also follow the site owner on twitter: http://twitter.com/Mikepruett
      >Mikepruett
      >Mike Pruett | Rochester, MN
      >@WheresKiger Just eat at a new fast food place called Nupa Express on 11thAve NW and Civic Center Drive it was GREAT 11:12 PM Sep 15th, 2009

      ... and rob HIS house when he's not home:

      >Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM
      >Pruett, Mike mlt@mltgroup.com
      >4012 5th Place NW, Rochester, MN 55901

      Give him a call to tell him you appreciate being able to track him: 507-281-3490

    2. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Boomerang+Fish · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh my god! It's coming right for us!

    3. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Tuidjy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'd have a better chance in court if you shot them while they were on your property
      than if you electrocuted them with a contraption that was clearly non-accidental.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    4. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by twidarkling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So in the US anyhow his statement works.

      That's actually not true. The premise is referred to as "The Castle Doctrine," and it's a lot more stringent than people think. It requires more than just "in fear for my life" and not shooting someone in the back. And in that's just in places that actually have Castle Doctrine laws. States that don't, you're even more fucked if you try and shoot someone on your property.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    5. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 3, Informative

      not sure where you got that premise of the castle doctrine, in most southern states with that law (like texas) you don't have to be in fear for your life, or the intruder even be armed, if at your own residence.
      http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/852831/deadly_force_and_self_defense_to_protect.html?cat=17
      Pretty much every state says you don't have to retreat from your property instead of deadly confrontation, (ie any "I was scared for my life" defense, if reasonable, would work at home.) Some states even allow you to protect yourself with deadly force to hold your ground in any setting where you are legally allowed to be.

    6. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by eleuthero · · Score: 3, Informative

      the only problem with this is that depending on how he placed the spikes, caltrops are completely legal (parking lot entrances with one way spikes, etc.). I agree that he could have run into problems if he didn't follow local laws, but spikes in the road are not by their very nature illegal.

    7. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by P-Nuts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup. And the guy who put the spikes in the road was crazy lucky. Even clearly marked booby traps are against the law pretty much across the US, and if the guy riding the 4-wheeler fell on a spike and was injured or killed, the owner could expect some fun jail time as well as a most excellent lawsuit.

      What's the legality of the "severe tire damage" spikes you have in car parks to stop people going the wrong way?

    8. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by eleuthero · · Score: 2, Informative

      He was referring to states that either had stringent rules or did not have "castle doctrine" laws. There was an article in the news a few years back about a guy in Michigan who was being tried for murder after shooting someone who entered his house with the intent to rob him (assault as well?). It is intriguing (and I do not know the outcome) but Wikipedia reports that Michigan only recently created a castle doctrine (2006).

    9. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should tell my local supermarket that. They have spikes so that traffic can only exit through it, otherwise it just pops their tires. So far, no one has gone to jail for it (somehow, I think you're thinking of much different kinds of spikes).

  16. If you want to rob me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please try my ex-wife's house. That's where you'll find my stuff.

  17. How many bears do you know that use twitter? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny

    10am, hibernating.

    11am, hibernating.

    12am, hibernating.

    1pm, hibernating.

    2pm, hibernating.

    3pm, hibernating.

    4pm, hibernating.

    5pm, hibernating.

    6pm, hibernating.

    7pm, ate hitchhiker.

    8pm, hibernating.

    9pm, hibernating.

    Mind you, considering the average tweeter, this is actually pretty riveting stuff.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  18. Re:The reverse side is: by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless you live in a state that has a castle doctrine...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  19. Some problems and a solution by bbtom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. It needs to be "please burgle me". If you aren't at home, then you are being burgled, not robbed. A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence (at least in English law - Theft Act 1958 - it is). If nobody is at home, then nobody can be the victim of violence or the threat of violence. So your home is getting burgled - or, if you are an American, burglarized (what the hell kind of a word is that, right?).

    2. PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person. If you know where I live, please be assured that I am currently not at my home. But other people live where I live. Families exist. Flat sharing exists. Communal living exists. (Yeah, go and raid the kibbutz - I'm sure it'll be empty!) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys. It's not true of the rest of the planet.

    That said, this kind of thing does show why most location-based services are stupidly designed. I have played around with a few of them, and the only one I'm a real big fan of is FireEagle. Sadly, it's been a bit neglected for business reasons - i.e. Yahoo! financial situation. What is great about FireEagle is you share you location with FireEagle, and they then share it with whatever services you want to share it with. So, I have the little iPhone app which updates FireEagle. FireEagle knows exactly where I am. Then there's a Facebook app which connects to FireEagle, but I don't necessarily have to let it broadcast my location if I don't want it to. Or I can only give a vague location - perhaps at a country or city level. I have it wired in to my SSH setup, so if I SSH in to my Linux box from certain places, it updates my location. Because it is a location broker, it can be updated in any way people think of, rather than having to use a specific application (say, for the iPhone) like FourSquare etc. do.

    This is useful as I can build applications that sit on top of it. One I have been meaning to build is a "remind me when I'm at X" app. So I could basically dump a string (SMS/tweet length) into a database with a broad location in it. It could check against my location and when they match, I could be reminded of X. Remember to buy ice cream when I'm at the supermarket - well, when I'm at the supermarket, I should get a text message saying to buy ice cream.

    Location-based services shouldn't be tied to devices but to people. This is what everyone gets wrong. They need really good granular privacy controls. They need a big "forget me" option. This is something Google Latitude doesn't have. There is no way I have found to tell Google Latitude "Hey, take me off the radar. I'm not anywhere anymore."

    When I have some time to build it, I'd love to build something like FireEagle but running on my servers and just for me. Location is too important, useful and fun to trust Google or Yahoo! or some venture-backed Valley startup with. But if you are building location-based services, look at FireEagle and learn.

    --
    catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  20. Geez SFC by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not only did you completely miss the joke, but at least to moderators did as well. It's a honeypot, you don't want a deterrent like a dog post.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  21. Fuck me running by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2
    TWO moderators!

    TWO

    Augh

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  22. Google maps+streetview mashup=SWEET by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone mash this up with googlemaps and streetview yet? That would really drive the point home.

    At last a little payback for all this unfettered twitter narcisism. It's probably not very nice, but I can't help feeling more than my share of shadenfreude...

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  23. Lol child-like Americans :-) by fantomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and that's why a lot of us are glad US law doesn't quite rule the whole world just yet.... sueing somebody else for emotional damage because you posted on the public internet that you're not at home, because this causes you "a great deal of emotional unrest". Presumably the same people will be sueing Google and every other search engine that's archiving these posts as they scrape the internet?

    Grow up, take responsibility for your own actions. If having the world knowing that you're not at home causes you "emotional unrest", well then don't tell the world. Seems to me that some folk are incredibly child-like, unable to take responsibility for their own actions. Not sure who to blame for this. But I sure hope these people don't have any influence or authority in the wider world, seems like they should be kept in some sort of kindergarten.

  24. Re:Robbery? or burglury! by dotgain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Worry not! Free dictionaries around the world are blurring the definition as we speak. Another pair of words that used to mean different things, but now mean the same thing, thanks to good old fashioned honest-to-god ignorance. See also "literally" vs. "figuratively"

  25. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by cpscotti · · Score: 2, Funny

    Insightful is the new Funny.

  26. Rob? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know who this Rob guy is or what he has in mind but I don't like the sound of it.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning