Slashdot Mirror


Switzerland Pursues Violent Games Ban

BanjoTed writes "We hear lots about the issues facing violent games in Australia, but the anti-games bandwagon is gathering pace closer to home — in Switzerland, to be precise. The Swiss government is gearing up to consider a total ban on mature games in the country."

46 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. Er... by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We hear lots about the issues facing violent games in Australia, but the anti-games bandwagon is gathering pace closer to home — in Switzerland, to be precise."

    Are you sure you don't live in Austria?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Er... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not true. There are some at the Vienna zoo.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  2. I'm Australian you instensitive clod!!! by syousef · · Score: 5, Funny

    This isn't closer to home for me:P~~~~

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  3. I can understand banning games by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some games are really bad, whether it be egregious content or age-inappropriate content.

    But there's no need to get violent about it. A normal rational games ban would work just as well as a violent games ban.

    1. Re:I can understand banning games by the_womble · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do they not ban all films, books, and CDs with content unsuitable for children as well?

    2. Re:I can understand banning games by lukas84 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really an issue, since anyone with a clean criminal record can purchase as much ammo as one wants.

    3. Re:I can understand banning games by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, you've changed my life! I suppose we could say that you've souffled it! I mean, you'd know what I meant, right?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:I can understand banning games by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be easier to ban children directly?

    5. Re:I can understand banning games by houghi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Rinminds me of when I was young, I was too young to go to a movie, so I just bought the book. When I was older, I saw the movie and what was written in the book was much more non-16 year old then the movie.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  4. Slipperly slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If as an adult you let the government treat you like a child, remember what happened to you as a child when you "said something mommy and daddy didn't like".

    1. Re:Slipperly slope by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      remember what happened to you as a child when you "said something mommy and daddy didn't like

      All those years of expensive therapy for naught...

      Thanks, asshole.

    2. Re:Slipperly slope by coolsnowmen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because I want to blow shit up...

    3. Re:Slipperly slope by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Great idea.
      If it's a crime it can't be the subject of a video game.

      Any super hero game is out since it encourages vigilante behaviour which is a serious crime.

      Uplink should be banned because it has the player commit serious crimes like breaking into computer systems without their owners consent.

      Commander keen is out since obviously he flew without a pilots liscence while underage (encouraging kids to joy ride), operated firearms without a liscence(unless 8 year olde are commonly issued liscences for powerful weapons) and murdered large numbers of animals with no consideration for proper methods of humane slaughter.

      Pacman is out since it encourages kids to consume pills which haven't been proscribed to them.

      Dwarf fortress is out since it allows genocide, torture, theft and flooding of populated towns with magma.

      The whole point of games is that they allow you to do things which would not be allowed in real life.
      I don't know about you but I wouldn't find "Accountancy: The Game" much fun.
      Similarly "Complying with building code regulations" is far less fun that lego.
      "Turning found large qantities of cash into the proper authorities to see if anyone claims it" is far less fun than rogue.

      Why limit it to computer games.
      Any children playing guns with pieces of wood should be forcibly stopped from playing games in which they act out doing illegal things like kill people.
      The blocks of wood should be confiscated and replaced with math books so that they can become productive members of society.

      The whole point of games is that they're not real life.

      I've never stabbed anyone despite playing as an assasin in oblivion.
      I've never shot anyone despite playing doom and GTA.
      I've never undermined by house with tunnels depite playing digdug

    4. Re:Slipperly slope by HungryHobo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're changing the goalposts.

      No I would not "support" any of those games.

      I would however not oppose them since they do nobody an harm of any kind.

      Freedom of speech is a bitch isn't it.

      I don't like rape games so I don't buy them.
      if I had children I'd discourage them from playing rape games.(hell I'd outright stop them)
      I support minimum ages for purchasing them.

      But there's zero reason to ban any of those.

    5. Re:Slipperly slope by radish · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why aren't we seeing any games manufacturer try for a push in games that aren't quite as destructive?

      You're right! Those damn game makers should try making games which aren't violent. Maybe someone could make a game where you're in a band, or maybe you're a DJ. How about sports? Someone should make a football game, or a snowboarding game, or skateboarding, or bowling!. If only someone had thought to make a game to tie into the Winter Olympics! There's such a lack of imagination in games these days.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  5. A great sign! by Spazntwich · · Score: 4, Funny

    With this focus by Swiss leadership on the dubious social dangers of simulated violence, we can at least take heart knowing they've found solutions to all other social issues with demonstrated negative impacts.

    I'm so happy to live in a world with such pragmatic leaders. We can always count on politicians for intellectually honest debate of issues and good faith efforts to fix the problems they can.

    So nice to sleep easy knowing that representatives the world over don't let themselves get bogged down in baseless populist hysteria or abuse the power they're given to manipulate economies such that wealth is redistributed to their buddies.

    I don't know what we'd do without our honest, hard working politicians. May your silver spoons never tarnish, you captains of hypocrisy.

    1. Re:A great sign! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Informative

      Switzerland...a country full of mountains where the majority of households has an assault rifle and 2/3's of the male population has military training.

      I was rather surprised the first time I got a mail from a business associate saying he wasn't going to be available for a few weeks, on account of him going off to crawl through mud, shoot heavy weapons and other fun activities. Not quite something you'd expect the typical porsche driving hot-shot business exec to do, let alone enjoy.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  6. Part of a general pattern by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Switzerland has very little regard for free speech. Very little regard for things that are unpopular or disliked and has an aging, reactionary voter base. Frankly, I got far more worked up over the ban on minarets that they enacted last year. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/30/world/europe/30swiss.html That was a much more serious violation of basic rights. This? This is small potatoes.

    1. Re:Part of a general pattern by golden+age+villain · · Score: 5, Informative

      Switzerland has very little regard for free speech. Very little regard for things that are unpopular or disliked and has an aging, reactionary voter base.

      Aaaaah Switzerland, this famous dictatorship... And you are supporting these claims how? Because I happen to live in that country but it doesn't seem to be the country you are describing. Free speech? Very little regard for things that are unpopular or disliked? What the hell are you talking about exactly? Do you have examples that make Switzerland stand out of the crowd of European countries? Agreed, the ban on minarets is not exactly the vote we can be most proud of. I would just like to point to the fact that Switzerland is no different from other European countries in that regard as was demonstrated by numerous polls in Europe following this particularly infamous vote. Also on votes asking whether or not to put a cap on immigration, the Swiss people have constantly voted no (there was several votes on this question since the 70s) and we have also accepted to embrace bilateral agreements with the EU and extend those agreements to the new EU members from Eastern Europe so I don't really see more reactionary voters than in any other western country. The only difference is probably that pretty much everything goes into a public vote and is hence very visible.

    2. Re:Part of a general pattern by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'll find stupid laws in any country, just because you heard of the minaret ban doesn't mean that's representative of Switzerland. Besides free speech does not mean you can build whatever you want, the minaret ban does not prevent anyone from saying what they want.

    3. Re:Part of a general pattern by Radtoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed. Free speech is not really in danger in switzerland:

      Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index 2009

      Freedom house

      I'm sure you can find more evidence if you care enough.

      Whether a human right has been dented with the minaret law is (potentially) still to be determined by some court. But I think it would sure be a tough case for the court. Determining whether towers in certain shapes can't be prohibited by a democratic and fair election isn't easy by itself, I bet. Add to that that these towers are not necessary, but only somewhat (modern-)symbolic for a certain religion...

    4. Re:Part of a general pattern by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I got far more worked up over the ban on minarets that they enacted last year. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/30/world/europe/30swiss.html That was a much more serious violation of basic rights.

      Can you name the "basic rights" that are being violated here? Nobody is stopping Muslims in Switzerland from practicing their religion, they are only not allowed to impose it on everyone else in the form of giant rockets (erect penises?) whose only purpose is to promote the said religion. Since they are not even being used for calling for prayer what else is their purpose?

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    5. Re:Part of a general pattern by biovoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ban on minarets was based on a vote of the public on that specific issue. The Swiss people decided on this issue. You may not agree with the result, but at least the Swiss have the ability to vote on specific issues, as opposed to most other so called "democracies", where the only control the individual has is on electing a representative. In other words, your "democracy" is really just a democratic republic.

    6. Re:Part of a general pattern by biovoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your ignorance of the Swiss political system is evident. Parties have very little impact on these issues. Do some research before making completely unfounded responses.

      Politics of Switzerland

    7. Re:Part of a general pattern by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wait one minute... The majority of Germans back the laws against Jews and Gypsies? Please get real references here....

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party

      Hitler came into power through a minority. His party never had the majority. The problem was that at that time Hindenburg was vehemently against the Nazi's, but to get a "functioning" government he allowed them to be a government. Think of it as follows in a modern context. Stephen Harper who is in the minority in Canada was allowed to be a government in by the governor general. The catch, and this is where things became dangerous once Hitler's party became the government one of their first acts was to impose absolutism. In a watered down way it was Harpers peroge where he stopped allowing the government to function.

      I am not saying Harper is Hitler because he is not. What I am saying is that Harper and Hitler from a political action perspective were very very similar. Once Hitler's party gained full control the propaganda started...

      BTW not every German was for Hitler. Neither my mother's family nor my father's family were Hitler supporters (and we are not Jewish either). My mother's parent's were "disabled" and hence were one of the ones who were considered sub-German quality. And my father's parents thought the Nazi's were trouble, they were industrialists my grandfather hated extremists! Though they were scared enough to not say much. As much as people enjoy the rights to free speech, right to demonstrate and a right to a fair trial. In those days you "disappeared".

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    8. Re:Part of a general pattern by Rakishi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pure democracy is called "tyranny of the majority" for a reason.

    9. Re:Part of a general pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Over here in California we have a more direct democracy and it results in tyranny of the majority.

    10. Re:Part of a general pattern by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Usually by people who wouldn't get their own way in a true democracy. Well boo hoo, suck it up , thats what true democracy is about. But instead in the west we generally have the type of "democracy" where the elected leaders happily ignore the majority in favour of pressure groups and minorities who make lots of noise. How exactly is that anything other than the tyranny of the minority?

    11. Re:Part of a general pattern by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called that for a reason.
      In a true democracy the majority have all the power.
      If 50% of the population vote yes then they can slaughter of all gays, black people or *generic unpopular group*
      I guess boo hoo, suck it up , thats what true democracy is about.

      Fortunatly most democracies are constitutional democracies where the power of the majority is limited so that groups which are not a large portion of the population don't get shit upon by the majority.

    12. Re:Part of a general pattern by yndrd1984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you name the "basic rights" that are being violated here? Nobody is stopping Muslims in Switzerland from practicing their religion, they are only not allowed to impose it on everyone else in the form of giant rockets (erect penises?) whose only purpose is to promote the said religion. Since they are not even being used for calling for prayer what else is their purpose?

      Can you name the "basic rights" that are being violated here? Nobody is stopping Christians in Switzerland from practicing their religion, they are only not allowed to impose it on everyone else in the form of giant torture devices (lower case 't's?) whose only purpose is to promote the said religion. Since they are not even being used for crucifying people what else is their purpose?

    13. Re:Part of a general pattern by thijsh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More exact it was a vote of over 100.000 people in Switzerland about the fate of their nation which was 'threatened' by a total of 4 (you read it right, four) minarets. A mayor factor why these people voted for the ban is the christian party in the country... Exactly like the ban on violent games the ban on minarets was engineered by a few conservatives who use fear to get a lot of people to vote their way. In the case of minarets they even had propaganda-posters like this: http://warincontext.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/swiss-anti-minaret-campaign1.jpg

      Maybe it's tyranny, but the majority is just cattle...

    14. Re:Part of a general pattern by CisJokey · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree at your base argumentation. But the same problem is containing in any indirect democracy (there will be few guys, telling al other guys what they should do, not do). So regardles what you could argue, its at least not that big problem in a direct democracy because millions of peeps have to vote yes or no (not a small elite). Or do you think all poeple in america did like to bomb Iraq down, this was an idea of few's... I think the real problem you describe (which describes your fears) is facism. And this can be a true problem, this was discussed in our country since the minaret thing happend (should all the peeps in switzerland really have that power). A lot of propaganda in tv, "the evil terrorists" combined with Islam and so forth. Generally swiss guys can only vote for things that are not violating basic human rights defined in the geneva convention or provided by organizations like the UN. So the minaret thing is still in discussion, if it gets treaded as violating basic human rights, the vote gets discarded and will be removed. (We can not vote for eating babies, killing black peeps). This was the one reason they voted against the minarets (which is useless and stupid), because voting against islam in general would not be allowed or is illegal. For two reasons; - It violates basic human rights - It violats the freenes of religion in basic. (At this point there was a huge discussion if voting against minarett is vioalting) I'm swiss and in my personal opinion, even as swiss voter, you are not allowed to ban that, because it harms the freenes of religion and a minarett does not itself brake any laws. They also can not put speakers on it (because they are to loud, as the christ. churches bells). But if your religion forces you to do something considered as illegal in here, you are not allowed to do so. There is another discussion at the moment about the jews and kosher meat.

    15. Re:Part of a general pattern by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, women in Switzerland didn't had the right to vote until as late as 1971.

      So that's 39 more years than in most muslim countries - and still counting.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. Watch those crime rates climb! by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If we look at the youth crime rates in the US, they dropped of precipitously when the PS1 came out and have stayed low compared to previous decades ever since.

    If the trend was the same in Switzerland, what happens when you take away that outlet?

    Most of the drop in crime likely comes from resolution of boredom, but it probably serves as a panacea for some of the whackjobs out there too.

    1. Re:Watch those crime rates climb! by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh video games, is there any crisis you can't solve ?

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  8. Not just unemployment by jbatista · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd like to see this much dedication in governments to other, more serious, forms of violence such as hunger, desease, poverty and (there I say it!?) corruption and unemployment. Yes, I realize banning unemployment is futile (some people are incompetent) but I consider it a vile form of violence against 40-something people when they're too old for employment but too young for retirement. But if they can get it right with some little things, maybe they can figure out how to get it right with bigger, more important things; but that is just a silly dream of mine.

    --
    My sig is better than your sig.
  9. You know where this is going by janwedekind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are Flash games and soon there will be HTML5 games and then they will be discussing the introduction of internet censorship.

  10. Closer to home? by srjh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some of us are Australian, funnily enough.

    1. Re:Closer to home? by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Funny

      What are you in for?

  11. on positive side by jarkus4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Switzerland has more direct democracy than most countries. Even if the legislation passes parliament, if someone gathers 50k signatures against some law (in 100 days), he can cause national vote on this matter. In this vote all citizens decide whether the law should stay or be rejected. So to get rid of it they just need to convince normal people (and not politicians) that this is a bad idea.

  12. Bundled with child porn... by Kolargol00 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course this stupid idea has been bundled with some child porn legislation to ease its way into the parliament. :/ Here is the original press release (in French, also available in German and Italian).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more. Junta
  13. Re:"Mature"? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's shorthand for "for mature audiences". But you knew that.

  14. Re:"Mature"? by mike2R · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He does have a point though - most of what is classified as "mature" in games really only appeals to teenagers. Take the sex scenes in Bioware's DragonAge; speaking as someone in my thirties they are cringe-makingly awful, but I suspect my eighteen year old self would have enjoyed them.

    It isn't just games. I recently reread what I remembered as some excellent Sci-Fi books, Peter F Hamilton's Night's Dawn series. I still like the books, but I found the constant gratuitous sex scenes really got a bit wearing after a while. When I first read them, I found those sections titillating.

    --
    This sig all sigs devours
  15. Re:Quoting Orson Welles... by zarzu · · Score: 3, Informative

    this quote needs to die, now.

    until the end of the 15th century the eidgenossenschaft was fighting the habsburg, throughout the 16th and 17th century there was religous civil war all over switzerland. at the end of the 18th century france essentially conquered switzerland and started the helvetic republic. the last fights on swiss territory were in 1847 and there is only democracy since the 19th century.

    that italy had a strong cultural development during the rennaissance has nothing at all to do with war and bloodshed, it mostly has to do with social structures, immigration and patrones like the medici family.

  16. Turnout of voters by goto_break · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since more than half of voters are over 65, there is little chance for that.

    This is just wrong: http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/17/22/publ.Document.89803.pdf Turnout of voters by age (in 2003): 18-24: 33% 25-44: 35% 45-64: 52% 65-... : 57% (and average age is 31)

  17. Thank you mother Helvetia by XAD1975 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This won't prevent me from driving 15 minutes to enter France and buy my games there. However, as Swiss Citizen, I feel concerned since: 1. This law will infantilize me and strip me from my adult judgment over what is good or bad for me. 2. This law doesn't deal with the real issue which is the lack of liability of today's parents in their progeniture's education. They tend to rely more and more on school & State to raise the kids they chose to have. 3. Child Pornography and Video Games are put together in this extract while they are different issues to be adressed. 4. What about other medias carying violence such as TV, Theatre, Sport, etc?