Slashdot Mirror


What You Get When You Buy a $40 iPhone In a Bar

Barence writes "How good — or bad — are fake iPhones? PC Pro blogger Steve Cassidy has a friend who paid £25 ($40) for an 'iPhone' in a bar, and he's got the photos and full lowdown of what's inside this not-so smartphone. The phone looks convincing enough from the outside, with a genuine-looking backplate, but things start to go wrong when you switch it on. What's a "Java" and "WLAN" App button doing on the screen? And how about that Internet Explorer icon? It's like you're handling an artefact from an alternate history, dropped in via a spacetime wormhole. It has dual SIM handling, too, and came with a bizarre auxiliary battery festooned with warnings about not pressing a button mounted on the front of the top-up device."

211 comments

  1. fraud by chibiace · · Score: 0

    haha its a pain some of these people try to sell them at near retail prices, when the customer finally gets the product they are very shocked.

    --
    he who controls the spice controls the universe
    1. Re:fraud by Tehrasha · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure its a fake, but will it run linux?

    2. Re:fraud by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Got Root?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    3. Re:fraud by themanwiththestick · · Score: 0

      Sure its a fake, but will it run linux?

      1. Fake iphone
      2. Linux
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

  2. Never fails to astound... by Shatteredstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know I'm almost never ceasing to be amazed by the effort and dedication of people who bootleg.

    So much hard work. So much time spent working out how to design, construct, and replicate just close enough to make the sale and in some places even make a 'moderately' working replica.

    If only the bootleggers could be recruited to actually create and sell your product!

    On another thought you have to wonder on a component standpoint some of the bootleggers/replicators (wow sounds like I'm talking about some robot race) throw it all together with all that effort and sell it so cheap when a suitably crappy real version can cost quadruple or more!

    --
    I do what I must because of what I must do.
    1. Re:Never fails to astound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If only the bootleggers could be recruited to actually create and sell your product!

      They can!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xflXMZL2stU

    2. Re:Never fails to astound... by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      The same could be said of all sophisticated criminals. For those that run large bot nets. Why so much effort into a crime? If you put the same effort into releasing good software you could make a very very good living.

    3. Re:Never fails to astound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could make a "very good" living being honest or make a fucking butt ton of money being dishonest.

    4. Re:Never fails to astound... by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So much time spent working out how to design, construct, and replicate just close enough to make the sale...

      I doubt there was little if any NRE (Non-Reoccurring Engineering) costs involved in the construction of these iPhonies. The price alone strongly suggests the most likely explanation is that the Chinese manufactures making the genuine iPhone, are running their production lines on the side, without Apple's consent.

      Apple has handed them the specifications and all the manufacturer has to do is build a few thousand more than what Apple orders. The bootleg manufacturers don't even have to pay for things like molds or automation setup costs. They then fill in any missing pieces (such as software or mute slider switches) with the cheapest thing they can get.

      You probably would be surprised at how often this happens with consumer goods built in China.

    5. Re:Never fails to astound... by gmack · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt that very much. The dual sim tells me it's not at all Apple electronics and most likely made by SCI. Sci makes cheap knockoffs using an OS they skin to make the front screen look like whatever OS they are mimicking. Slap an Apple look alike case and home screen and it's an iphone. Slap a t mobile g1 case on it and it's Android.

      I actually own one. I needed a cheap phone fast and their G1 knockoff was cheaper than even low end phones around here. It wasn't bad for the price but I wish they wouldn't bother skinning it to look like other phones.

    6. Re:Never fails to astound... by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

      Also: Sawyer makes the con game look well sexy.

    7. Re:Never fails to astound... by orlanz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its called the 3rd shift. You have Chinese factories that just keep the assembly line running for a third unoffical shift. The local assembler, nor the US company really cares enough to stop them. Not to mention the incentives from the under the table dealings.

      Why doesn't the US company stop them? Cause the markets that they really care about and make profit in (US and Europe) have heavy enough disincentives to make bootlegging insignificant in comparison to the costs of further stopping them. Plus, the majority of the bootlegging sector can't or won't afford your product anyway. They aren't a customer to begin with, so why stop them from subsidizing your purchasing costs to the 3 shift vendor.

      Now when politics hits the fan or someone gets greedy under the table, all Ell breaks loose.... for a week and then freezes over again. As to address gmack's post further down, most mass produced hardware is like lego blocks. You just need a smart enough individual in electrical engineering to put things together in the right order (trust me, that's not a scarcity in most of the world). So its not too hard to put an extra solid disk chip, sim reader, flash light, or even add a FM component when you are already the assembler who has access to the _expensive_ specs, the assemblers, AND the manufactures behind them. Not to mention, most hardware will automatically support the additional stuff as its already built in, but for high, profitable yield ratios, those features are disabled or not used (See AMD Phenom II X series for an excellent example). This is why the third shift stuff is such a hit or miss, its doesn't have proper QC to minimize the defects. If they did, it would be VERY expensive... more so than the original.

    8. Re:Never fails to astound... by Nikker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sim is really the only part of the phone apple didn't design. It is a standard part that is roughly the same for all phones because it comes from specs from the FCC or your local equivalent. It would be like a wifi chipset it just deals with radio protocols and encryption. The main point is that the only benifit to outsourcing to China is labour costs, you have to provide specs for everything. When they are not only making the overall design but all the individual components are being manufactured right next door to each other it's just about working with what you've got (which in this case is not that bad). A hand full of engineers patch work some extras or start up a ghost shift and just pay / hide material costs and you're up and running. With overall performance getting pretty good you can't really go wrong. They just have to make it Linux compatible in some way and the community will likely take care of most of the support. For that price and some mobile OS that I can find software you have a product. We've given a lot to the Chinese and if there is ever a plateau they've got silicon valley by the balls.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    9. Re:Never fails to astound... by garompeta · · Score: 1

      Why would they take the risk? Once they are in your factories they can copy your products even better.
      See the biggest sportswear brand in china, Li Ning, even their logo is a blatant copy of Nike (but upside down) and their motto a blatant copy of Adidas ("Anything is possible" vs. "Impossible is nothing").

    10. Re:Never fails to astound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Artistic license. The bootleggers have to be geeks knowledgeable enough to build equipment. So, think of it as a black-Ops engineer, with a tech-minded soul, similar to ours. We tend to reduce the enemy to some form of mindless AI's, but you should give them credit too, and they are proud of their knock-offs enough to add signature touches that they feel the original COULD have had.

      They assemble a product to BEAT or equal the real product in terms of features. More likely, users know and avoid their knockoff, but cheapskates and first-time "clients" only need a phone to appear better than the market one from competitors of the legit phone.

      Without all the corporate laws and mandates, or even a need to obey IP and licensing for the new components and features, it's a piece of cake. The bootlegger creates one single product; their "product line" doesn't need 10 different models of this newly created knockoffs and probably doesn't get refreshed every couple years like the real iPhones. When the iPad came out, it very carefully omitted features that would make Apple lose sales of more expensive laptops and iPhones (camera, screen type and flash licenses.) The bootlegger's team doesn't have to worry that selling iPhon-y 2.0 will cut a prior bootegged iPhon-y 1.0 or iPhonyPad. Even if they did, each sale of their iPhony, being illegal in Apple's eyes, pipes some real profits away from the seller.

    11. Re:Never fails to astound... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't the US company stop them? Cause the markets that they really care about and make profit in (US and Europe) have heavy enough disincentives to make bootlegging insignificant in comparison to the costs of further stopping them. Plus, the majority of the bootlegging sector can't or won't afford your product anyway. They aren't a customer to begin with, so why stop them from subsidizing your purchasing costs to the 3 shift vendor.

      Why can't game developers figure this out? It's not worth the cost.

    12. Re:Never fails to astound... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      or record companies, or movie studios?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    13. Re:Never fails to astound... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      the sim is little more then a id number and some storage space for contacts and sms.

      basically its there to tell the network operator that the phone is connected to, where to send the bill for any activity.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    14. Re:Never fails to astound... by tsa · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't the US company stop them? Cause the markets that they really care about and make profit in (US and Europe) have heavy enough disincentives to make bootlegging insignificant in comparison to the costs of further stopping them. Plus, the majority of the bootlegging sector can't or won't afford your product anyway. They aren't a customer to begin with, so why stop them from subsidizing your purchasing costs to the 3 shift vendor.
       
      Now when will the RIAA understand that and stop their manhunting?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:Never fails to astound... by gmack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dual sim means dual sim slots and two recievers so the phone can connect to two networks at once if you don't mind a shorter battery life.

      It's a particularly Chinese innovation and not just a small tweak of an Apple design.

    16. Re:Never fails to astound... by Neoprofin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until you're found shot to death in the doorway of your Moscow apartment?

    17. Re:Never fails to astound... by Atryn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why can't game developers figure this out? It's not worth the cost.

      or record companies, or movie studios?

      Seriously? Do you think these are comparable? One is a manufacturing situation in which there are scaled cost advantages in overlooking excess production that doesn't affect your sales market. The other is almost purely Intellectual Property in which excess production and circulation has no advantages and often does creep into your (otherwise) target market.

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    18. Re:Never fails to astound... by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Probably when they begin having 3rd shift musicians recording knockoff albums in studios after hours and... oh wait, you're comparing a physical manufacturing operation to a company that deals with intellectual property and copyrights, which doesn't make sense at all! You're an idiot.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    19. Re:Never fails to astound... by tsa · · Score: 1

      Well, you're a freak, so we're even :)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    20. Re:Never fails to astound... by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      I'll go along with that. :)

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  3. the new version by rarel · · Score: 4, Funny

    the iPhony!

    1. Re:the new version by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      As a user of the real iPhoney I'm offended you would say that.

    2. Re:the new version by mysidia · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see your iPhoney and raise you an iPony.

      The iPony is the only farm animal that comes complete with a beautiful white embossed iApple logo, and a USB port for syncing your ride data and loading playlists for listening while you are driving around in your iPony

  4. What You Get When You Buy a $40 iPhone In a Bar by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Arrested?

  5. High Standards by Itninja · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFA: The final nail in the coffin was an app we found five screens in, which even allowing for "cultural differences" Apple would never allow through the approvals process. The app in questions showed a lissom Asian lady lying on a bed who wriggles and moans suggestively when you rub your finger over her.

    So Apple would not allow this, but we can have like 100 fart apps? That's pretty messed up.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:High Standards by Shatteredstar · · Score: 5, Funny

      So its a cheap softcore porn device? I could see a market for this thing in bars everywhere!

      --
      I do what I must because of what I must do.
    2. Re:High Standards by sdpuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now all they have to do is put in tactile feedback, and you've got an iPhone killer !

    3. Re:High Standards by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      It's actually just a (rather old) flash game.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    4. Re:High Standards by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Interesting
      even the knockoff iphone can do flash?

      And it only costs $40?

      The article fails to note if there are any bad traits to this phone...

      --
      Bottles.
    5. Re:High Standards by Pyrus.mg · · Score: 1

      A Flash game? No wonder Apple hasn't got an app for that.

    6. Re:High Standards by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I could see a market for this in high schools and on college campuses everywhere.

      And in convenience stores... they can put the cheap softcore porn device right by the dirty magazines.

      And there'd probably be a market among slashdot readers too, they could do online sales and sponsor slashdot with ads, they'd probably sell out very quickly...

  6. Awesome review by DavidR1991 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ashens did a review of one of these a while ago (the menu does not look identical, but the resolution of the screen + font seems similar).

    Sharing purely because I found it fairly amusing (especially the call dropping feature...)

    1. Re:Awesome review by Announcer · · Score: 1

      I appreciated the guy's wry sense of humor. (Or should I spell that Humour?) Well done.

      --
      Willie...
  7. Is it worse or better? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A guy I work with has one of these he bought in China. If it has a removable battery and Java it might be a good thing to own.

    1. Re:Is it worse or better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are standard fare from DealExtreme. I don't know why this is even news.

      Actually some of the phones they have look pretty decent. I wouldn't mind getting my hands on one of the watch phones that they sell.

  8. SEE!!! by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what the new 'Anti-counterfeiting Treaty' currently being negotiated in secret is meant to protect us from!

    Moral of this story - Don't buy a smart phone after you've been drinking all night and especially not one from said bar! I mean, come-on, everyone knows bars don't sell phones they sell hookers and blow!

    1. Re:SEE!!! by Shatteredstar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt it will protect us really, afterall I have my own views on how well 'anti-counterfeiting' will work in countries that have repeatedly basically said "We'll do something about it!" then obviously not done anything.

      As for moral of the story we can take another from it...

      "There is a strong market for cheap thrill devices in bars!"

      --
      I do what I must because of what I must do.
    2. Re:SEE!!! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Moral of this story - Don't buy a smart phone after you've been drinking all night and especially not one from said bar!

      I seriously thought, for a moment or two, you said "especially not one from the salad bar!"

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:SEE!!! by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not? It sounds at least as good as any other cheap touchscreen phone at a quarter of the price.

    4. Re:SEE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what the new 'Anti-counterfeiting Treaty' currently being negotiated in secret is meant to protect us from!

      This is exactly NOT what ACTA is being negotiated for.

      ACTA is being negotiated to crush people who share their DVDs, CDs, and games with friends. Destroy people who buy a CD and then load it on their MP3 player. Beat up on people who sample, mix, or otherwise do anything but consume media.

      And when I say "crush", "destroy", and "beat up" I mean sue them for everything they have. Sheesh! No wonder it's being negotiated in secret!

    5. Re:SEE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone knows bars don't sell phones they sell hookers and blow!

      You're right, forget the phones.

    6. Re:SEE!!! by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Wooooooooosh

  9. Better value per dollar by phoenix321 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's even better than the iPhone:
    - two SIMs
    - user-changeable battery
    - unlocked

    but here's my favorite:
    - "drag and drop files through USB port of computer (No Software Required)"

    No mandatory iTunes. Eat that, Steve!

    1. Re:Better value per dollar by Shatteredstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Strange the person may've bought an actual semi useful thing..once they get some of the junk off of it!

      Perhaps the bootleggers in this example have actually produced something with some degree of quality/usefulness that surpasses the real one...well at least to the Apple haters out there of course.

      --
      I do what I must because of what I must do.
    2. Re:Better value per dollar by pikine · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This quote from TFA hits the target right on.

      What leaves me speechless is that the SciPhone must represent more work and more value – and more capability – than its £25 asking price, just in terms of cost of development and production. Just about the only way to be stupider than incurring Apple’s wrath with a forgery, is to grossly undervalue the technology you use as part of that forgery. It’s a bit like making a forged pound coin by melting down gold sovereigns

      It actually seems to be a very useful device, sold dirt cheap only because the manufacturer couldn't get over the guilt that they're selling counterfeiting iPhone. Now, I only wish they would design and market a legitimate brand to compete with Apple.

      --
      I once had a signature.
    3. Re:Better value per dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What makes you think that legit sales are even an option? It probably infringes buckets of patents (most obviously the touchscreen) and I'm sure that IE and Java and whatever other software are not legitimately licensed. Since any effort at branding would get them shut down by the FTC and international trade laws, they don't have much of a choice.

      But I'd still consider buying one.

    4. Re:Better value per dollar by phoenix321 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I can speak from experience that Chinese no-name dual-SIM touchscreen phones are way better than their price point and reputation would suggest.

      600RMB (~60 EUR) would get you a touchscreen phone from ChangHong with integrated stylus and character recognition (Chinese and Latin, but it's error prone), high resolution display (480*x?), two SIMs, music player, straight mini USB interface, driverless USB mass storage interface, 8GB integrated, up to 32gb via SDHC micro and a 2.5Mpixel camera. And the phone can be set to English (with some Engrish in the mix of course). Bluetooth yes, but no 3G, no WiFi.

      It looks like this (I don't know if that is the model I played with, it looks only vaguely similar)
      http://img.alibaba.com/photo/263983686/ChangHong-F8-mobile-phone.jpg

      An interesting feature is text-to-speech for names stored in the address book: it actually read the name of a caller in understandable English. Caller not in the adressbook with CLIP enabled had their numbers spelled aloud. In Chinese only of course :)

      One feature I was very content with is the battery time: it has a 4000mAh battery - NiMH, not Li-Ion but still. A solid two weeks of battery power with medium amounts of talking time in between is more than impressive. Within the 600 RMB package was a second identical battery, a charging station, a 5V USB charger that could be substituted with any other 5V USB charger that exists. That way, you could always keep one battery charged and switch as soon as the other battery got low. Memory effect shmemory effect - you'll get a brandnew original battery for 5 EUR, so it's no problem charging the thing whenever you need to. Maybe Li-Ion is overrated and the situation where a memory effect would be noticeable isn't that common. I mean, who recharges their phone daily?

      Measured in value-per-dollar, this thing was great. Downsides and eventual deal-breakers were some Engrish remains in the menu but the worst was some menus that were in Chinese only, no translation available. The games for example, but also some SMS sub-menus.

      When (not if!) ChangHong gets around to translate the firmware with all submenus and iron out the last kinks, this will devastate the lower end cellphone market.

    5. Re:Better value per dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish there were good second / third tier supplier phones out there to buy! I was actually excited when I heard some babble about clones iphones or whatever mentioned,
      but disappointed when I found that they apparently clones the wrong part (imho) of the phones. They made the thing physically LOOK LIKE another popular handset, but not with
      suitably good functionality / hardware / software inside. Frankly I don't give a damn about 'branded' phones like iPhone, Nokia, whatever. I just want some generic piece of hardware
      that I can buy at a commodity price with reasonable quality in the hardware, at least workable software, and basic compatibility with GSM/3G.
      Actually I'd prefer if it WASN'T one of the popular 'branded' devices sold by US carriers or Apple or whatever since generally they have the nasty habit of taking a perfectly
      reasonable bit of phone hardware and doing stupid things like locking it to a given carrier's network or crippling the firmware / user interface so that you can't do whatever you want
      with the software (e.g. no user upgradable OS or Web browser or user supplied games / apps / JAVA programs not authorized by the carrier). I just want to buy a freaking handheld PDA
      which happens to have a 3G/GSM phone and GPS included in the mix and runs an otherwise open / unrestricted version of Android or Windows Mobile or whatever that doesn't attempt to restrict
      what I do with the phone so there's no need for 'jailbreaking', 'rooting', 'unlocking' etc.
      Yes you can buy an unlocked Nexus 1 for like $500 though AFAIK that isn't totally 'open' in terms of what you can do with it in software since IIRC there were comments about various restrictions
      between what you can't do (install apps to SD card) or differences in what is permitted in a 'developer handset' vs. a consumer one or whatever.
      You can get a Nokia N900 but the software seems still buggy, the phone has Q/C issues that seem offputting for a top of the line handset, and Maemo has no future.
      Other than that there are pretty slim pickings for 3G phones you can buy and actually own/control what you've bought and have a full smartphone feature set with modern HW/SW.
      Seems like people said there would be a flood of new Android based devices on the market from upstart companies in Asia or whatever taking advantage of the free Android platform, which
      at least showed promise for making the 3G smartphone hardware platform an open commodity priced platform with a broad number of vendors (think netbooks) but that does not seem to have happened since there still are only a handful of models you can buy, most crippled/branded/controlled through Verizon, ATT, Tmobile, and the odd european imports from somewhat less restrictive European carriers (SIM unlocked anyway) but still usually crippled and incompatible with some US 3G frequencies.

      Hello, Taiwan, *please do* make some "generic" 3G GSM handsets based around Android or Moblin or heck even Symbian or Moblin if those are sufficiently open. Show me a $50-$200 handset with similar specifications to something like a Nexus 1 or HTC HD2 but without the crippled/locked software and the 'brand tax' that something that is associated with a popular near monopoly carrier / brand like HTC/Nokia incurs, and I'll buy a couple. I don't even care much about the style or the sleekness. Heck I'd even rather have one like a brick if it actually was decently designed to be water proof / drop proof / rugged against dust / dirt / scratches and had a double-size battery instead of the ridiculously underpowered low capacity batteries they stick into most handsets these days. Don't clone the STYLE, clone the basic HARDWARE PLATFORM like all generic PCs / NETBOOKS do, basic ARM Snapdragon / Cortex A8 CPU, RAM, FLASH, 3G modem, Android firmware, 4.5" screen, battery, done. Not hard. No reason for these things to cost $400-$500 when a netbook with twice the hardware capability in it costs $220 retail.

    6. Re:Better value per dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you could probably install Linux on that thing!

    7. Re:Better value per dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NiMH doesn't really have a memory effect. That's NiCad you're thinking of.

    8. Re:Better value per dollar by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they have, just much much less than NiCd. But why don't most phones have NiMH batteries? NiMHs are dirt cheap, really. The Changhong phone I had was 2.5cm thick. Not iPhone-class, of course, but not bulky either. I'm sure there are a lot of people and professions out there that could really use a 4000mAh battery with 2 weeks of standby time.

    9. Re:Better value per dollar by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Bah, scratch that, I measured it again, it is not 2.5cm but 1.8cm, very similar to a Sony Ericsson W800.

    10. Re:Better value per dollar by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      touchscreen phone from ChangHong with integrated stylus and character recognition (Chinese and Latin, but it's error prone)

      Who sends text messages in Latin these days? The Pope?

    11. Re:Better value per dollar by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      This comment is using Latin characters. Thanks for asking.

    12. Re:Better value per dollar by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Chinese no-name dual-SIM touchscreen phones are way better than their price point and reputation would suggest

      character recognition (Chinese and Latin, but it's error prone)
      And the phone can be set to English (with some Engrish in the mix of course).
      Caller not in the adressbook with CLIP enabled had their numbers spelled aloud. In Chinese only of course :)
      Downsides and eventual deal-breakers were some Engrish remains in the menu but the worst was some menus that were in Chinese only, no translation available.


      Doesn't sound 'way better' to me.

    13. Re:Better value per dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why cant they put android on this, or at least make it easy to be hacked by us to put android on.

      Common chineese people, make a generic phone like a generic PC, and android can be the new 'DOS' for phones, like 80s PCs.

      Oh and GPS should be a requirement.

    14. Re:Better value per dollar by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Utor Latin cotidie, vos frigus agrestis.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    15. Re:Better value per dollar by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Better than a Zune at least.

    16. Re:Better value per dollar by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > NiMH doesn't really have a memory effect. That's NiCad you're thinking of.

      Sort of... if you egregiously abuse a NiMH battery by repeatedly recharging it when it's not even halfway discharged, it will eventually start to ACT like a NiCd battery with memory damage. The difference is, unlike NiCd, you can undo almost all of the damage by discharging it to the point where the phone shuts down, fully charging it back up, and repeating a few more times. With NiCd, memory effect is more or less irreversible and permanent.

    17. Re:Better value per dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, you wrote NiMH not NiCd. NiMH do not have a memory effect. Cheers.

    18. Re:Better value per dollar by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      In english Slashdot, latin fatur vos!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    19. Re:Better value per dollar by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You may disbelieve it because it's from Wikipedia, but here goes...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel-cadmium_battery#Memory_and_lazy_battery_effects

      It is unlikely that this precise repetitive charging (e.g., 1000 charges / discharges with less than 2% variability) could ever be reproduced by consumers using electrical goods.

    20. Re:Better value per dollar by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, and this is nothing new - the Iphones have long being playing catchup to what's available in cheap bog standard phones (e.g., 3G, copy/paste, video recording, Java, MMS, ability to run apps from anywhere, tethering). Sure, it has better hardware (you'd hope so, for the price), but it's also had gaps that have taken Apple years to fix (and in some cases, they're still not available), and it is hardly the be all and end all of phones, nor is it clear why it deserves the "smartphone" label when other phones don't (all feature phones are smartphones these days, really, by the original meaning of the term).

    21. Re:Better value per dollar by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "This comment is using Latin characters. Thanks for asking."

      So "phoenix321" is Pope's nickname on Slashdot? Really funny, isn't it?

    22. Re:Better value per dollar by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      Latinos!

    23. Re:Better value per dollar by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I found a problem wit their blackberry clones: WAP wouldn't work on this side of the ocean, only with Chinese carriers. Other then that, i agree it was a decent ( not great... ) deal.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    24. Re:Better value per dollar by mysidia · · Score: 1

      With no brand... how much can you trust that they don't have a pile of software on that thing spying on you?

      For example, to collect information about you to sell to ID thiefs: or if you are foolish enough to login to a banking website on the device....

      Counterfeit device, unknown software, no company to shutdown... basically means they could be doing whatever they want (as long as they can do some basic coding)

    25. Re:Better value per dollar by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      How do you spell "Whooooosh" with Latin characters?

    26. Re:Better value per dollar by hitmark · · Score: 1

      or it could be a classical case of upselling the brand.

      take a generic set of jeans, they are usually cheap. Slap a specific logo on them, and you can ask for 100-200% of the generic version...

      from the sound of it, the knock-off phone is no different from a samsung, lg or sonyericsson feature phone. But as its a no-brand phone, it sells for parts and labour + maybe 10-20%.

      also, when it comes to phones, most are subsidized by the carrier in exchange for a contract binding you to their service for a number of years. For the companies making the phones, this can be a incentive to mark up the unsubsidized phone cost, with the result that the subsidized phone looks cheaper (or more valuable) then it really is.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    27. Re:Better value per dollar by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      See, with Sony devices, you can trust they *have* a pile of software on that thing spying on you.

      With Apple devices, you can trust they *have* embedded your current GPS coordinates and a timestamp into every single JPG you shoot.

      With Apple devices, you can trust they will gouge you for every cent, with a locked phone, apps only from The Man, data exchange through The Man's iTunes application.

      And I certainly know other major brands sending tracking information home, HP printers were worst, but there were others I don't remember now.

      No brand or World brand, they all spy on you. Even the world's most trusted governments and agencies do.

      What is that "Trusted brand" you speak of? We're not in the Fifties anymore when a Brand Name actually carried trust in a sense of "I certify for quality since I built it myself" - since the 1990s, a brand only means "We are expensive. With this brand, you can show your friends how well endowed you are (financially and anatomically)"

      Case in point: "Nike" is the world's most well-known brand and they have Vietnamese children to assemble the shoes. Deserving of our trust, eh?

    28. Re:Better value per dollar by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Okay. The brands probably are phoning home to report information such as usage statistics and othe data.

      What they are probably not doing is uploading your confidential web site logins, banking passwords, account numbers, etc.

      The liability would be too much if they got caught. And it would tarnish their brand. The brand name companies definitely have a lot to lose.

      The companies are on the record, on the up-and-up: if they do anything really bad, and get found out, they can be held accountable.

      If someone finds out a fake iPhone was spying on their every move, logging every keystroke, uploading every password, there's not a thing they can do, no company they can sue, etc.

      Their only mitigation is to attempt to change all passwords (if they discover early enough, and not through abuse of said passwords to further unsolicited mail, steal their ID, or steal funds).

    29. Re:Better value per dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      touchscreen phone from ChangHong with integrated stylus and character recognition (Chinese and Latin, but it's error prone)

      Who sends text messages in Latin these days? The Pope?

      Of course not, silly! He said error prone. The Pope is infallible!

    30. Re:Better value per dollar by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Now, I only wish they would design and market a legitimate brand to compete with Apple."

      I give a fuck about "legitimate"?

      Sell me the knockoff and I'll deal with any problems since it was cheap. Either way my money goes to the same
      ChiCom assembly plant.

      With the knockoff I get access to something I'd not otherwise buy.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    31. Re:Better value per dollar by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      My understanding is the reason phones moved from nimh to liion was higher energy density afaict laptops moved to liion for the same reason (laptops moved much earlier than phones though).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  10. Re: What You Get When You Buy a $40 iPhone In a Ba by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Why? How is buying something in a bar different from buying it off (say) craigslist?

  11. Re: What You Get When You Buy a $40 iPhone In a Ba by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    Yep, but at least this one comes pre-jailbroken.

  12. so in other words by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    This thing is far more useful than an iPhone!

  13. Sorry dude, it's fake by TokyoJimu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recently spotted a waiter with an iPhone in a third-world country so I went over to ask him about it. But it quickly became obvious that it was a fake. The sad thing is, I don't think the guy knew it. He said his mom paid $120 for it but it was basically unusable. You had to press real hard on the screen and the location calibration was way off (I'd played with another fake iPhone when I was in Laos and it was much better than this one). I showed him mine and the way it's supposed to work, with just a light flick of the finger.

    Once I'd convinced him it was a fake, he asked me how much fakes like his go for in the U.S. I told him we don't have the fakes because you can get a new real one for $99 (with two-year contract). I ended up talking to the guy for a half-hour and it was a learning experience for both of us. But I felt bad for the guy, having spent several months' salary on a phone that barely worked (and possibly thinking that Apple makes such poor products)

    1. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How much is "$99 (with a two year contract)"?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by rarel · · Score: 1

      The point is that you pay 99 bucks and leave the store with one. Contract technicalities are another story altogether.

    3. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just checked for my local area. A $99 iPhone requires paying at least $69.99 a month with a two-year contract. That includes a (required) data plan at $30/month and the cheapest cellphone service at $39.99. There's also an activation fee of $36. All totaled, that's $1,814.76.

      The cheapest cellphone service is 450 anytime minutes and 5,000 night/weekend minutes. The next step up is $20 more for unlimited night/weekend. And the next step up is another $10 for unlimited anytime.

    4. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by EvanED · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not that I want to dispute your overall point of that's what you're counting, but a contract that binds you to another $1700 outlay over 2 years isn't much of a "technicality".

    5. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by TokyoJimu · · Score: 1

      True, it all adds up. But still, people in the U.S. (and most other developed countries, I suspect) don't buy fake iPhones.

    6. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It all depends. How easy is it to get one? If I knew there was a guy in town that had a knock-off phone shop, and he'd warranty it for a year, I'd spend the $40 with him, rather than full price elsewhere, or to be tied into a perpetual contract. Hell, if he warrantied it for 6 months, he'd probably get my sale.

          I'm one of many, who usually don't qualify for the discounted 2 year plans, so my choices (if I wanted an iPhone) would be the full retail no-contract rate, which I believe is somewhere in the ballpark of $400, or one of the unsubsidized phones for $40. If I go through less than 10 phones in 2 years, I'm still ahead. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by UnknowingFool · · Score: 0

      And your point is? Most cell phones in the US are subsidized. You can pay the $99 and then the 2-yr contract or the unsubsidized price of $599. It's your choice, and it's the same whether you get a Blackberry or an iPhone or a LG, etc.

      Another point to make is that Apple has no control over what AT&T will charge you for the contract. No manufacturer does. Nokia can't tell T-mobile nor Sprint nor AT&T what they can charge for rates.

      The only point of contention is that the iPhone is only on AT&T at the moment. That also is not unusual. Some cell phone models are exclusive to a single carrier unless you unlock them. Most phones can't be used on some carriers. For example you can't use a T-Mobile Motorola RAZR on Verizon's network. You have to buy a Verizon Motorola RAZR(v3) because it uses a different band.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    8. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the can do spirit that has made America what it is today!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by rarel · · Score: 1
      Oh sure.

      Should have put quotes, it was meant as sarcasm. Personally, I think such lock-in contracts are just evil. :/

    10. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most cell phones in the US are subsidized. You can pay the $99 and then the 2-yr contract or the unsubsidized price of $599. It's your choice...

      Apple won't sell me an unlocked iPhone. Amazon doesn't have it, nor does Newegg.

      Another point to make is that Apple has no control over what AT&T will charge you for the contract.

      Not directly, but the fact that they only sell an AT&T-locked version means that I must go through AT&T to use get one. If Apple wasn't so restrictive, I could buy an unlocked version from them and use it with my existing AT&T account, or my T-Mobile account.

      The only point of contention is that the iPhone is only on AT&T at the moment.

      As far as I'm concerned, that's like saying "the only difference between 0 and 1 is that they aren't the same."

      For example you can't use a T-Mobile Motorola RAZR on Verizon's network. You have to buy a Verizon Motorola RAZR(v3) because it uses a different band.

      Ah, but I can buy an unlocked Razr and use it on either AT&T's network or T-Mobile's network.

    11. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Should have put quotes, it was meant as sarcasm

      Fair enough. :-)

      Personally, I think such lock-in contracts are just evil. :/

      Agreed. (And I practice what I preach on that point too: I've never signed a cell phone contract, and just spent $550 on an unlocked N900.)

    12. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      And your point is? Most cell phones in the US are subsidized. You can [etc.]

      Everything after your first sentence is irrelevant, because that wasn't his point.

      Hal Porter and EvanED's point was that the "$99" genuine iPhone being compared with the fake $120 one in truth would work out significantly more expensive because it was only available at that subsidised price with an expensive contract.

      Even if the contract worked out well for some people, it's still misleading to compare the pricepoint of the subsidised iPhone with the (probably) non-tied fake model.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is why basically all phones are subsidized. Most people don't know how to count, so they think that $1800 is less than $120.

    14. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. They assume they're going to have to pay for cellular service in any case, and therefore don't care all that much about the contract.

    15. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Apple won't sell me an unlocked iPhone. Amazon doesn't have it, nor does Newegg.

      Buy one overseas, then. The US is the only country where you can't buy unlocked iPhones.

      If Apple wasn't so restrictive, I could buy an unlocked version from them and use it with my existing AT&T account, or my T-Mobile account.

      It's not Apple who is being restrictive, but AT&T - see above point that iPhoines are sold unlocked everywhere outside the US.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    16. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Apple won't sell me an unlocked iPhone. Amazon doesn't have it, nor does Newegg.

      You missed the point. The price of a phone in the US is somewhat misleading because they are almost always subsidized. So someone trying to say that the $99 iPhone is expensive is meaningless because you have to buy a 2yr contract if you want the cheap phone price.

      Not directly, but the fact that they only sell an AT&T-locked version means that I must go through AT&T to use get one. If Apple wasn't so restrictive, I could buy an unlocked version from them and use it with my existing AT&T account, or my T-Mobile account.

      And how is that different from a Palm Pre or the first versions of the Motorola RAZR? Both were exclusive.

      Ah, but I can buy an unlocked Razr [motorola.com] and use it on either AT&T's network or T-Mobile's network.

      You missed the entire point again. Can you use a Verizon Motorola RAZR on a GSM network? No.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    17. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by UnknowingFool · · Score: 0

      Hal Porter and EvanED's point was that the "$99" genuine iPhone being compared with the fake $120 one in truth would work out significantly more expensive because it was only available at that subsidised price with an expensive contract.

      Apple has no control over what a network will charge you for your rates. Saying one model is more expensive than another while including the rates in one phone and not another is not a fair comparison. If you live in the US, you are subject to AT&T's rates. If you live in the UK, you are subject to Orange rates. Orange will allow for pay as you go while AT&T does not.

      All the comparisons here say: It's $99 but you have to pay for 2 years, but this other phone, I only counted the phone price and not any rates I would have to pay were I to use it for 2 years.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    18. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Skater · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, but what would the service cost without the phone? If AT&T split out the "phone subsidy" from the monthly price so you could see what it was, I think you'd discover that most of that $1800 is actually what you'd be paying anyway for the service. And it's not like the competing cell phone companies here have very different rate plans - they seem about equivalent to me, last time I checked a couple weeks ago.

      For example, let's use T-Mobile, and pretend they offer the iPhone. They discount the price $10/month if you're not subsidizing a phone, I've heard. So the subsidy fee is actually $10*24 months = $240. The other part of the $(monthly fee*24 months) is the service that actually makes the phone useful as a phone/web browser/text message device. You would have to pay that (or a similar amount) at any carrier, regardless of the phone.

      I'm not sure why Slashdot has so much trouble understanding this. Slashdotters seem to think that cellular networks, phone networks, and internet bandwidth are free to install and maintain, and that $1800 several people quoted is entirely going to pay for the phone. Last time I checked, $240+$99 or whatever is still far less than the unsubsidized price of $599. (Actually, the subsidy is really less than that in today's dollars, because the monthly fee is worth less and less over time.)

      If your real beef is with the two year contract then don't get one. No one is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to sign a contract or buy an iPhone. It's their product, they can offer it on their terms; if you don't like it, you don't have to accept it. And, frankly, two years isn't really that much time. Wait until you buy a house and are "locked in" for 15 or 30 years (Heard over on Housedot: "There are fees to sell a house! OMG! It's a tarp!").

    19. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by EvanED · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Buy one overseas, then. The US is the only country where you can't buy unlocked iPhones.

      I'd rather buy from a company that actually wants my money; Apple apparently doesn't.

      It's not Apple who is being restrictive, but AT&T - see above point that iPhoines are sold unlocked everywhere outside the US.

      And whose choice is that? Apple's. It's their phone.

      They're the company that chose to make the exclusive deal with AT&T. Without Apple, AT&T wouldn't have any say in the matter.

    20. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      A) The problem is that the previous poster claimed that the iPhone is $99 compared to the knock off's $120. That is simply untrue. Even using your math that puts the iPhone at $340, the knock off is still dramatically cheaper. The previous poster was trying claim that the iPhone was cheaper. Using discount example, it only takes 1 year for the TCO on the unsubsidized phone to become less than the iPhone. Of course the $599 price ticket on the iPhone is total BS. Since you cannot buy one unsubsidized, any number that is put out there is simply for marketing purposes.

      Either way, the fact that someone claimed an iPhone was cheaper than a $120 unsubsidized phone shows that people cannot count, and as long as people cannot count, and are easily confused by the subsidized price, you will always see the subsidies.

    21. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by mdwh2 · · Score: 2

      The point is that $599 is way more than $120, as mentioned in the OP.

    22. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The US may not have "Iphone fakes", but obviously there is a market for $120 or similar phones, without contract. The Iphone fake things sounds more a property of fashion than technicality - people are engulfed by the RDF, and think they look hip if they have an Iphone.

      I showed him mine and the way it's supposed to work, with just a light flick of the finger.

      So his had a resistive screen - try using your phone with gloves sometime, and see how well that works for you.

    23. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "It's not Apple who is being restrictive, but AT&T"

      Oh, sure, come on! AT&T went after Mr Jobs with a really big gun telling him "you are not going to trade this gadget with anyone else, are you?"

    24. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by sorak · · Score: 1

      But I felt bad for the guy, having spent several months' salary on a phone that barely worked (and possibly thinking that Apple makes such poor products)

      I'd hate to be "that guy", but if $120 is several months salary, then thinking Apple makes poor products is probably the least of his worries.

    25. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by TokyoJimu · · Score: 1

      At Macworld Expo, several companies were selling iPhone-compatible gloves. Good thing I live in an area where these are not needed.

    26. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by demonlapin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, it's worth noting that regardless of the phone used, most people with a smartphone will subscribe to a talk+data+text plan costing in the neighborhood of $100/mo. So, if you're going to pay that much anyway...

    27. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point is that the $120 (outright) fake is an order of magnitude cheaper then the $99 (contract) real one, and the OP mislead the third world waiter about it by claiming otherwise.

    28. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      you did not consider the consequences of being "locked in" to any contract. if you move and get no reception in your new area, too bad, you signed a contract. if your financial situation changes, too bad, pay up.

      and best of all, now that you are locked in, providers have little or no interest in keeping you happy as a customer. they can provide whatever crappy service they want and it doesn't matter because the majority of their customers are locked in.

      in the US, providers don't compete on service. they compete on what shiny new phones they have. pretty inexpensive for the providers. the cost of giving you a discount on the shiny phone is insignificant compared to their savings from serving you with poor reception, technical support, and customer service over the course of your 2 year contract.

    29. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      ... If you don't count TFA.

      And, If I had the choice between $1,913.76 for a real one or $40 for a not-in-jail fake one, I think I would take the fake one, even if I had to press harder to get the screen working.

    30. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what would the service cost without the phone?

      About $720, because I wouldn't get as expensive a plan.

      The other part of the $(monthly fee*24 months) is the service that actually makes the phone useful as a phone/web browser/text message device. You would have to pay that (or a similar amount) at any carrier, regardless of the phone.

      I pay $30/month. That gets me enough airtime that I'm maxing out my account because in any given month, I use far less then I pay for. With that I get (admittedly absurdly expensive) a la carte internet access, which I use for minor things like checking bus arrival times.

      The thing you're overlooking is that iPhone-like devices are plenty useful without a data plan. Lots of places you can pick up wi-fi, and even in the absence of connectivity it can still be used as a PDA.

    31. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by fat+bastard+of+doom · · Score: 1

      To this third world waiter this 120.00 may have had the rough equivalent in buying power of a month or more worth of wages, whereas even the 599.00 in the United States is just a couple of weeks even at low wages. If you live on 50.00 per month, the 120.00 is a hell of a lot.

    32. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what would the service cost without the phone? If AT&T split out the "phone subsidy" from the monthly price so you could see what it was,

      I think they should do that, and so should all the other phone companies. People make more informed choices when they know what they pay for, and capitalism only works properly as long as the consumers make informed choices.

    33. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a brief discussion of horses heads, and offers that cant be refused.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    34. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      Basing your math on T-Mobile's discount is completely misleading. They're still not removing the whole subsidy cost. The price of $599 you quoted is about right, and that's how much you should save by bringing your own phone. The networks are still trying to make lockin seem like the best deal.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    35. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      You call $1500 surcharge a "contract technicality"?

    36. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      The point is that an iPhone doesn't cost $99, but $1780. If the waiter could barely afford $120 for the cheap phone, he wouldn't be able to pay 2/3rds of that every month. The guy probably uses a pre-paid sim card with very reasonable rates (by U.S. and European standards)

      The iPhone exclusivity is all about premium prices and has nothing to do with technical difficulties. If Apple weren't intent on raking in a large chunk of those $1680, they'd let me use the Phone with a cheap data plan of my choice.

    37. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Consumers who are offered the choice often go for the cheaper, more competitive plans. €30 - €40 are totally adequate for an extensive voice+data plan. I can get a data-only plan for €15/month. iPhone plans on the other hand are just plain expensive.

    38. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy one overseas, then. The US is the only country where you can't buy unlocked iPhones.

      Wrong you are. Many countries in Europe have got their own operator selling the 2 year contact bundled iPhone.
      Sadly this is the case.

    39. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Apple has no control over what a network will charge you for your rates.

      That's debatable, as the exclusive telco agreements they had in several (all?) countries when it was first launched implies some degree of leverage, as did the cut they received.

      However, this is irrelevant to my main disagreement:-

      Saying one model is more expensive than another while including the rates in one phone and not another is not a fair comparison.

      I never said it was. The point that provoked the debate was someone trying to compare a $99 subsidised and contract-tied price to one whose "real" price was $120. I believe the OPs were making this point when they added the contract price.

      As I said, *depending on your usage*, the contract price may still work out well, but you can't compare the two unless you do it on a per-person basis.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    40. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what would the service cost without the phone? [..] I'm not sure why Slashdot has so much trouble understanding this. Slashdotters seem to think that cellular networks, phone networks, and internet bandwidth are free to install and maintain

      Then you seem to have made assumptions and missed the point that was being made. You can't directly compare a $99 contract-tied price (as the OP did) to a $120 "real" price.

      Of course, depending on what your service agreement is, the iPhone may well work out cheaper, but that's a different comparison altogether and will vary by person.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    41. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Please note the currencies involved. Nested-9-deep isn't the place for a full-on rant against US cell companies, but typical US plans break down as $30/mo for data, $20/mo for unlimited texting (although you can usually get 500 texts for $5, 1000 for $10, etc. - and that counts sent and received texts), and a minimum of $30/mo or even $40/mo for phone service. You can get $50/mo unlimited everything through prepaid like Boost Mobile, but you have to use their phones.

      iPhone plans are expensive, but the last time I checked they were only $10/mo more expensive than the same data/voice/text option on, for example, a RAZR. And they're the same price as the Blackberry plans.

    42. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      If you have an expensive plan, then yeah, the subsidy will be more. But that still doesn't make the iPhone any cheaper or change the fact that it's overpriced unless I use all those texts and minutes. Most people don't BTW.

    43. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You may well consider it overpriced; you're certainly entitled to your opinion. My comment was offered in response to the statement that an iPhone cost $1800. It doesn't; for the typical smartphone user in the US, it's more like $99 up front + (maybe) $10/mo for life of contract, because that user was going to get a pimped-out plan to begin with. At that rate, it's $340 over the life of the contract, which is in fact less than the unsubsidized price.

    44. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      /disengage reality distorion field

      This is just rediculous reasoning. The iPhone costs $1800 over two years. There are other options which are much cheaper.
      If you don't have $1800 (over two years), you can't afford the iPhone.

    45. Re:Sorry dude, it's fake by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      An iPhone may have a total cost of ownership approaching $1800 over two years, but most of that is money spent on the plan, not on the phone. It's disingenuous to ascribe costs to the phone that are part of a plan you would have bought anyway - it's not as though the plan goes down in cost when your contract ends. If you have a smartphone in the US, you are going to pay a lot for it - a data-only plan from AT&T is $60/mo. T-mobile offers unlimited messaging and data with limited minutes starting at $60/mo, and they're the cheapest option (with coverage that often matches the price). $60/mo is $1440 over two years, plus the cost of the phone.

      So it does take a lot of money to own a smartphone - any smartphone - in the US for two years. But the iPhone isn't a standout; the cost for a Droid, or a Nexus One, or a Blackberry is about the same. (I carry a Droid, because AT&T had no service where I work. That's since changed, but I don't like the iPhone or dislike the Droid enough to switch.)

  14. Botnet by kheldan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wouldn't at all be surprised, especially for the rediculously low selling price, if it's got botnet software embedded right into it, and this is part of an overall plan to create a wireless and mobile botnet. Either that, or a tool for direct identity theft or worse.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Botnet by mr+exploiter · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised either if the the devices sold by American companies had same backdoor for government wire-taping. Oh wait this is already happening.

    2. Re:Botnet by khallow · · Score: 1

      I got to agree. My bet is that they're grabbing credit card numbers and bank information.

    3. Re:Botnet by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Probably also shows up as a drive for Windows with a handy autorun.inf for installing said software. "Please to type administrator password for the sync"

    4. Re:Botnet by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

      "I wouldn't be surprised either if the the devices sold by American companies had same backdoor for government wire-taping."

      Wait, the government is taping wires to things now? I've heard some pretty wacky conspiracy theories in the past but this one sounds feasible! Any suggestions on how to protect ourselves from this nefarious plot? (I'm all out of tin-foil. Oh noes!!)

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    5. Re:Botnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely the knock-off was so cheap because it was nicked from somewhere. I'd expect something like that to be at least twice the price, and I don't think it has enough value as a botnet member to subsidise the difference.

  15. Ya, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does the phone work?

    1. Re:Ya, but by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if it doesn't, that's almost as good as the phone in an iPhone.

    2. Re:Ya, but by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      You might think so, but I know somebody who picked a couple of these up in China. They did indeed look real cool, but after the juice ran out it was discovered that the battery would not recharge.

      Guess it is cheaper to make a knock-off that just makes it past point-of-sale. Who you gonna call?

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  16. Where the hell can I get one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    An iPhone running Windows Mobile 6.x?

    In other words, an iPhone that can run GS Player and Opera? And can use it as USB storage? And for $40?

    I'm sorry, but I don't see a down side here.

  17. News Flash: by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    When you buy a name-brand item from someone you don't know on the street or in a bar, you get a cheap knock-off.

    Film at eleven.

    1. Re:News Flash: by KaimaraZatar · · Score: 3, Funny
      "When you buy a name-brand item from someone you don't know..."

      Well, you could take the time to get to know them. But they'd probably still sell you the cheap knock-off.

    2. Re:News Flash: by Jeng · · Score: 1

      And all this time I thought if I were to buy a name-brand product for dirt cheap at a bar that it would be stolen property.

      Probably in the states its more likely to be stolen at least rather than a knock-off. Knock-offs are more likely at the flea markets in the states rather than at bars.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    3. Re:News Flash: by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, the same holds in the UK as well- if a guy offers you something in a pub at a cheapass price, it's likely stolen. Though I guess it *could* be a scammer floggeing fakes to people who think- and don't care- that they're getting stolen but genuine goods at a cheap price.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:News Flash: by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Here in East London, the traditional patter for people flogging fake perfume is "Its the same as you buy in Selfridges/Harrods, the only difference is... it came out the back door instead of the front. So you pay £10 instead of £40. A bargain. How can you resist?"

      The answer to the question is "Cos it smells like cat's piss!"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  18. Coming to a Home Depot lot near you... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like White Van speaker scams
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_van_speaker_scam/

    If that is the case, expect it to be made from cast-off electronic components with a failure rate not unlike a Yugo

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:Coming to a Home Depot lot near you... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_van_speaker_scam is the correct URL, that extra "/" at the end seems to make wikipedia sad.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    2. Re:Coming to a Home Depot lot near you... by mike260 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The guy got a functioning touchscreen smartphonefor £25. Counterfeit or not, it's hard to call that a ripoff IMHO.

    3. Re:Coming to a Home Depot lot near you... by Toonol · · Score: 2, Informative

      My experience with Chinese knockoff products is that they're half the quality, more versatile, and ten percent the price. Often a better overall deal than the original.

    4. Re:Coming to a Home Depot lot near you... by RichiH · · Score: 1

      It does because mediawiki supports namespaces which, you guessed it, use a slash.

  19. Youtube video review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an interesting video review of a fake iPhone on Youtube:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2tVE7qRLwk

  20. for the money, you still have a better deal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... than this guy.

    And that "Asian lady lying on a bed who wriggles and moans suggestively when you rub your finger over her. " is exactly the Axe Feather game; wonder if they actually ported Flash to that phone.

    1. Re:for the money, you still have a better deal ... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That's a wonderfully 'legitimate' looking website...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  21. Re:WARNING I have a friend by trmj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alright, so I made that whole story up.

    That was obvious from the subject line.

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  22. "full lowdown"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A full description would have been most interesting, but this was just a glance description. From TFA's own author: "I got my hands on it for basically 2 15 minute contacts."

    Please re-title as What /. Gets When You Buy a $40 Editor In a Bar.

  23. Re:WARNING I have a friend by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a better premise than the the last ~500 movies of the week on Syfy.

  24. Great timing by rsayers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I *just* ordered one of these from eBay yesterday. I needed a cheap unlocked phone, this option was cheaper than most name-brand used phones and at the price I paid, I won't be terribly upset if it's complete garbage.

    1. Re:Great timing by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      On one hand, what possible use is a phone that actually doesn't work?

      On the other hand, what fun is it to play with an obvious iPhone knockoff?

      See? I could have been an economist... ''other hand'... In fact,

      I might actually be one now...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Great timing by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      this option was cheaper than most name-brand used phones and at the price I paid, I won't be terribly upset if it's complete garbage.

      Why would you pay actual money for 'complete garbage'?
      Ok, $5 maybe. But I've got a bag of actual garbage I'll sell you for $10, if you want it.

    3. Re:Great timing by Boogaroo · · Score: 1

      Be prepared for a poor web browsing experience.
      Pages will show up in Chinese.
      You won't be able to access some pages that require you to log in.

  25. HiPhone Clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a HiPhone a while ago, and promptly sold it for being amateur hardware.

    It was a reasonable fascimile, but anyone who compares it to the real thing wouldn't be fooled for a moment.

    Of course, a HiPhone isn't a counterfeit (I guess), but a clone. I'm not sure if there's a real difference, but it too supported a number of features I liked over the iPhone, including dual SIM, expandable memory, and being unlocked.

    It was still awful, so I bought a Sony Ericsson and just when it was getting time to upgrade, the Nexus One was released.

    I can't even imagine using a regular phone now.

  26. So? by hduff · · Score: 1

    . . . a bizarre auxiliary battery festooned with warnings about not pressing a button mounted on the front of the top-up device.

    What happened when you pressed the button?

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:So? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Funny

      the universe was completely destroyed and replaced by another universe, identical to the first except it was one in which the button had not been pressed.

    2. Re:So? by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

      A notice comes up saying "Please Do Not Press This Button Again"

    3. Re:So? by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      Well, I got the reference even if no mods did.

      --
      Squirrel!
    4. Re:So? by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      You are so kind!

    5. Re:So? by mysidia · · Score: 1
      All of planet earth got sucked into a void, Futarama-style.

      Stephen Hawking: "Great. The entire universe was destroyed."
      Him: "Destroyed? Then where are we now?"
      Al Gore: "I don't know. But I can darn well tell you where we're not: The universe!"

      "Anyone wanna play Dungeons & Dragons for the next quadrillion years?"
      Stephen Hawking: "Yes, please."
      Deep Blue: "Pawn to rook A."
      Al Gore: "I'm a tenth level vice president!"

    6. Re:So? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The button jumped to the other side of the phone as he tried to press it.

    7. Re:So? by Tanuki64 · · Score: 1

      What happened when you pressed the button?

      You will get 1000000 dollars and somewhere in the world a person you don't know dies.

    8. Re:So? by u38cg · · Score: 1
      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  27. maybe it's better? by darrenkopp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i bet it'll run flash before the iphone does.

  28. I've been using one for the last year by johnny6vasquez · · Score: 2, Informative

    I initially bought one of these as a joke.

    At first I hated it, but it really grew on me. Having an unlocked iPhone form-factor phone, that I can transfer anything I want to it, pictures, music, movies, all over usb, is really nice. I took it traveling and really liked having two batteries, especially after I started reading books on it. Say what you want about the new eBook readers, but I love having a backlit screen that can fit in my pocket, fit hundreds of books on microSD cards, and has a backup battery. I could read clearly at night in bed or waiting for the subway in poorly lit areas.

    It's really funny to watch an iPhone user try to use my phone, because even though it looks nearly the same, the screen handles way differently, needing more of a tap than a slide.

    I wouldn't buy one of these for running apps on, I would just use it for an eBook reader and phone. That's all I wanted out of it and it exceeded my initial expectations.

    This is the one I have: http://product.madeinchina.com/CECT-i9-Quadband-Unlocked-Dual-Sim-PDA-Smart-phone/10618567.shtml

    If all you want is a unlocked phone and eBook reader with awesome battery life, give it a try. But the article is right that it can't compare to an iPhone. The user interface sucks compared to Apple's product, especially when you move into the submenus.

    1. Re:I've been using one for the last year by argent · · Score: 1

      What's the OS? Does it run Mobibook reader?

    2. Re:I've been using one for the last year by johnny6vasquez · · Score: 1
    3. Re:I've been using one for the last year by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The one thing which would make me seriously consider buying one (or more) of these phones - even though I'm in an all-CDMA area - is the ability to run Linux on them - Maemo/Moblin/Android or similar.

      So, I have to wonder: why hasn't anyone put Linux on any of these, and why isn't there an extensive modding community? Do they have DRM or some such thing preventing such a thing, or are so many corners taken that booting anything but the stock ROM will fail? A new $50 ARM computer with decent specs and a usable touchscreen, not to mention killer battery life? Where do I sign up!

      Think about it: these are dirt cheap MIPS or (more likely) ARM based devices. They've got some solidly impressive specifications (even if half the parts barely meet electrical tolerances). They are not slow. Equivalent or lesser development platforms (FriendlyARM) are much more expensive ($140 or so) for something similar, and that's about as good as you can find for a dev board with a touchscreen LCD of any type.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:I've been using one for the last year by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I thought I might add: if the asking price in a Chinese market is $40, you know they'll part with the device for a fraction of that. They probably get them for $10-15 each and are pleased if they make $25 each.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:I've been using one for the last year by johnny6vasquez · · Score: 1

      The CPU is a MT6226 CPU http://www.infinity-box.com/wiki/index.php/Chinese_Miracle

      As far as I can tell, the people who mod their i9s use SpiderMan for flashing firmware and MTK Flash Tools for reading firmware, all over a com port using a special cable.

    6. Re:I've been using one for the last year by johnny6vasquez · · Score: 1

      This is the model I have http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93RnYZaeyFk, it's a bit slimmer than the video in the thread above. I never dropped calls either, although the touchscreen was frustrating to get used to. The UI isn't as good as Apple's.

    7. Re:I've been using one for the last year by DrXym · · Score: 1
      If all you want is a unlocked phone and eBook reader with awesome battery life, give it a try. But the article is right that it can't compare to an iPhone. The user interface sucks compared to Apple's product, especially when you move into the submenus.

      Sooner or later Android is going to turn up on these things and then people will able to buy cheap and functional smartphones for practically nothing.

  29. WTF? by Dorsai65 · · Score: 1

    What the hell did he THINK he was going to get for his money? In a freakin' BAR?

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the fake iPhone was less of a surprise than the tranny he had picked up in that bar the previous night.

    2. Re:WTF? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I don't know.. but it sounds like he got something (slightly) more useful than what is normally sold at a bar :)

      Liquor and electronics are just different ways of disposing of cash... the latter at least can have a more lasting benefit.

      Whereas $50 spent on mixed drinks is a sunk cost that provides brief pleasure for one night, and then goes away.

  30. fake blackberry, money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I recently bought a fake blackberry at the Official Beijing Fake Market for 40$, and I love it. (I think the case is similar to the Blackberry 8900)

    Dual sim, QWERTY keyboard, good screen, fast (and stable) firmware, excellent battery time (thanks to 3700mAH battery), bluetooth, can be used as a webcam via USB, TV Tuner, and the list goes on! It even has a lot of options my previous 'real' phones did not have, like saving texts directly to MMC. (8gb supported).

    Here's the kicker:
    It's a full J2ME phone so I managed to install many apps, including Google Maps and Opera 5.2, which both work excellent.

    It's excellent build quality, but if this one breaks I'm buying a "Chinese Copy Phone" again.

    1. Re:fake blackberry, money well spent by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Does the official Beijing Fake market have a website of some sort?

      I mean.. if it's necessary to travel to China to reliably find a certain one of these nice phones, the trip itself could easily be more costly than the phone.

      It would also be nice if there were a listing of the different "fakes" available, their characteristics, and how to most easily obtain the best ones.

      I'm sure there's more than one "fake" modeled/skinned after the same branded model, and variation of quality fr. maker to maker....

    2. Re:fake blackberry, money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said official cause it's actually marked on tourist maps as the 'beijing fake market'.

      Fact is there are markets, and fakes, everywhere.

      It's actually quite easy to buy these phones online.
      Googling for 'chinese copy phone' lists this one: http://www.vkamobi.com/categories/Hot-class/iphone-copy/ as the 3rd result orso.

      Prices seem higher than the ones sold locally, but that's to be expected. (I paid 40$ after bargaining, first asking price was 200$)

  31. Lame by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    600RMB (~60 EUR) would get you a touchscreen phone from ChangHong with integrated stylus and character recognition (Chinese and Latin, but it's error prone), high resolution display (480*x?), two SIMs, music player, straight mini USB interface, driverless USB mass storage interface, 8GB integrated, up to 32gb via SDHC micro and a 2.5Mpixel camera. And the phone can be set to English (with some Engrish in the mix of course). Bluetooth yes, but no 3G, no WiFi.

    Hmm, so it has less space than a Nomad, and no wireless...

  32. Googles real intention now becomes clear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With open source operating systems available to replace the legally dubious copies of Windows Mobile and Nucleus RTOS that these phones use at present, the chinese phone market will not only have a flourishing Android ecosystem itself, but be able to sell these phones into the west with little impediment. . Genius Google, pure genius.

  33. Re: What You Get When You Buy a $40 iPhone In a Ba by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Funny

    MichaelSmith, age 5: "But what was the underlying cause? Was he in search of food? Was he being pursued by a predator? Was there a potential mate on the other side of the road?!?"

    MichaelSmith, age 10: "Technically they never found any parts of the astronauts washed up on the beach, which makes that a single entendre!!"

    MichaelSmith, age 15: "All mammal meat is RED!! Plus the anatomies are completely different. OJ wouldn't necessarily be any better at cutting a turkey than anyone else just because he allegedly murdered someone."

    MichaelSmith, present day: "That doesn't even make sense! There were eight years between the Challenger disaster and the OJ Simpson trial, and supposedly I only aged FIVE years?!?!"

  34. Re:WARNING I have a friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd watch it.

    Does he have to fight a giant ice spider as an earthquake spontanteously causes volcanos to gush forth boa constrictors?

  35. They're all over the place... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    You see the iphone-wannabes on ebay, craigslist, etc, all the time. Even more impressive is how little time it takes the counterfeiters to crank out the clones. A while ago I did a search on ebay for the blackberry 8520 - which is a pretty recent model - and came up with quite a few clones along with the genuine phones. They even list them as "8520", and they fake the RIM blackberry logo, but they don't mention until the end of the listing that the phone is is a fake. A fake with many similar features and a much lower price, that is.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  36. Re:WARNING I have a friend by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    You got something against snakes?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  37. I'd be afraid to by KingSkippus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'd be scared to try to use this for anything but maybe passing some idle time playing games.

    I mean, think about it. The OS and core apps are developed in China. I'd be afraid if I use Chinzilla to read my e-mail on this thing, even if by WiFi, it would be "phoning home" to the people who installed the software to let them know where I'm going, what I'm doing, and oh, here are his passwords. Good luck reporting or prosecuting that identity theft.

  38. Re: What You Get When You Buy a $40 iPhone In a Ba by mschoolbus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Arrested as in beer, not as in speech.

  39. The icons by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    Odd how they decided to rip off some icons for the interface but not others. And some of the ones they did rip off were used for unrelated apps like the Safari browser icon for an app named "Compass." Strange.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  40. Could they get Android to run on it? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    Since Android is open source, couldn't they just use it and skin it to mimic the iPhone? That would be free and legal, and potentially make this a pretty cool device.

    1. Re:Could they get Android to run on it? by luther349 · · Score: 0

      well these phones only resemble the iphone. some models do have decent cameras and work ok. but there mostly built from cheap standard cell parts more often in stuff inside is just leftover stock. meaning they don't have close to the prossing power of a real iphone or android device. i saw one fake on youtube that could barley fake the ui it did it but dirt slow and just froze when trying to play a video. also you gotta look at the fact there ripping off the name and look for a reason iphones sell. but i do agree if they did make one that could run android well and sell it cheap they would have a market and would not be conserderd bootlegging as long as they steal no names.

    2. Re:Could they get Android to run on it? by MathiasRav · · Score: 1

      Android is just the software, you still need drivers to communicate with the hardware, and those are probably not freely available.

    3. Re:Could they get Android to run on it? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      OK, but there is published driver API, and it seems within reach of this knockoff company to write these drivers. I mean, they had to something like this and a lot more in order to put (sort of) functioning software on the phone. Since the clones are made with commodity hardware, many of the drivers would already have been written, no?

  41. Re: What You Get When You Buy a $40 iPhone In a Ba by snowraver1 · · Score: 0

    mammal meat is RED

    False, see pork, babies.

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  42. Re:WARNING I have a friend by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of my colleagues once bought a cheap Chinese MP4 player but it had a Sony battery and got so hot it melted in his pocket. When the doctor cut away his pants to examine the damage it turned out that China had actually partially merged into his leg -- he now has a large chunk of Asia in his lower hip. Pretty disgusting but there are some great camping sites near his knee.

    Now he's Chinaman, fighting against injustice by kicking evildoers with a leg that weighs several billion metric tons, which tends to hurt them a lot. His arch nemesis is every single Chinese citizen because they're not too thrilled about some random twit constantly tossing their entire country around. Also, the local tram company; fitting China into a tram is really difficult. He also can't fight injustice during Chinese New Year as his leg goes home to be with its family.


    Okay, so I made that up. The tram company doesn't really hate him.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  43. Marketing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In many ways it's not about the technology at all. It's not like the iPhone represents things which are that far ahead of the technological curve.

    It's about piggybacking on Apple's huge marketing presence and brand-name-recognition.

    Those bootleggers could use the same amount of technical "hard work" to create a distinctive and useful device which does 80% of what an iPhone does at 20% of the cost... And then fail to make any money at all because everyone would buy the iPhone anyway.

    Too bad we don't live in a world where the substance of technology always wins over the form of its marketing presence. But hey, anyone running Linux knows that :p

  44. Re:WARNING I have a friend by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of when Matsumura Fishworks and Tamaribuchi Heavy Manufacturing Concern merged.

  45. Blow S. Jobs by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The app in questions showed a lissom Asian lady lying on a bed who wriggles and moans suggestively when you rub your finger over her.

    Sold me! Where do I get one of these "special" iPhones?
         

    1. Re:Blow S. Jobs by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      You can start here. This may not be the exact model you're looking for, so check out the other phones.

      http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.31876

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  46. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, /. has nothing else to report so they post things about stuff that happened 2 years ago? Anyone can go on ebay and get a sciphone/i9 iphone knock off for about 50 quid shipped to your door new.

  47. Someone made a comparison for a ditto fake N95 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x2E1ZL_7O0

  48. My roommate has this by gorrepati · · Score: 1

    He has two of them actually. He ordered one, and got two. Anyways, it was not as convincing as the author of this post lead us to believe. Yeah, it was similar, but once the screen is turned on, I could see it was not an iPhone.

    --
    You will never have experience until after you needed it.
  49. Pounds Sterling, not US Dollars. Pub, not bar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why was it felt necessary to submit the story with $40 in the title instead of £25? The fake iPhone wasn't bought for $40, it was bought for £25. Come to that, why wasn't it felt necessary to prefix the dollar sign with an indication of which country's currency it refers to? Given Slashdot it based in the US and given current exchange rates I assume it refers to the US dollar, but the US is not the only country which uses dollars.
    Why was it felt necessary to submit the story saying that the fake iPhone was bought in a bar, when the article says it was bought 'down the pub'?
    Does the submitter not think Slashdot readership is capable of understanding things unless they're translated in to US terms?

  50. Splashing out £25 in a bar by jpallan · · Score: 1

    this gentleman certainly got off light, when one considers what most things you can pick up in a bar for £25 get you.

    --
    "Video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor" -- Ovid, Metamorphoses
  51. Re: What You Get When You Buy a $40 iPhone In a Ba by heson · · Score: 1

    Not much, both are probably stolen and or fake. It is the price not the place.

  52. Where you can buy it today for $100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just think I stumbled across where you can find this unit for about $100 buck's

    http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.32675

    TVG10 2.8" Touch Screen Dual SIM Quadband Dual Camera TV GSM Cell Phone w/Wifi and JAVA (Black)