Slashdot Mirror


Lost Nazi Uranium Found In a Dutch Scrapyard

colin_faber writes "Lewis Page of the Register is reporting that forensic nuclear scientists at the European Commission's Joint Research Centre traced the two pieces of metal found in a Dutch scrapyard — described as a cube and a plate — back to their exact origins and dates. Apparently both came from ores extracted at the 'Joachimsthal' mine in what is now the Czech Republic from the former Nazi nuclear-weapons programme of the 1940s." The article runs through the roadblocks that, unknown to the Allies, the Nazi regime erected against their possible success in any nuclear bomb development during the war.

50 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Many boffins died ... by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... to bring us this information. Context:

    Furthermore the Germans were hampered by having driven many top physicists out of the country with their anti-Semitic policies, and also by drafting other boffins into the army to fight as ordinary soldiers.

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
    1. Re:Many boffins died ... by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why can't we talk about 1940s Germany without bringing up the Jews?

      but you fuck one goat...

    2. Re:Many boffins died ... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stupid British slang. Of course, its hardly a real news source, hence the slang in the first place.

    3. Re:Many boffins died ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article is about Germany trying to build an atomic bomb during WWII. Jewish scientists who fled Germany around that time include Einstein (E=mc^2, the basis for atomic bombs), Teller (father of the hydrogen bomb), Bloch (worked with neutrons, worked on the Manhattan project), Wigner (told Roosevelt about Nazi bomb plans, worked on the Manhattan project), Szilard (same as Bloch, one of the people who first conceived the a-bomb) and Frisch (same as Szilard).

      Do you suppose some of those guys might have been kind of useful to a German atomic weapons program?

    4. Re:Many boffins died ... by Vahokif · · Score: 3, Informative

      Teller, Wigner and Szilárd were actually from Hungary, not Germany.

    5. Re:Many boffins died ... by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Einstein had nothing to do with the atomic bomb, other than supporting it politically. Not to say that he wasn't a brilliant physicist, but he really had nothing to do with it.

    6. Re:Many boffins died ... by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Einstein did many things, and yes his formula was instrumental in predicting the power that a nuclear explosion would have (and yes - he miscalculated the first time, everyone did). However his contribution to the atomic bomb was limited to the suggestion that "matter should be convertible into energy". Not much more than that sentence. Of course, that sentence was the reason a lot of scientists re-examined the properties of known radioactive materials, leading to :

      The direct basis for atomic bombs, for a quick neutron-cascade reaction in enriched uranium, laid by these scientists :
      Otto Hahn (German, Nazi)
      Fritz Strassman (German, most likely also a Nazi)
      Lise Meitner, Jewish, who initially received a "special exception" from the Nazi regime for her work, and protection from a thoroughly Nazi university in Austria, but then was forced to flee anyway

      But this was only fission itself, and the suggestions that if somehow large amounts of U-235 were used with cadmium-enriched water between them that a "large amount" of energy would be released. This release of energy was not yet a bomb, it is what we call today a "meltdown". Dangerous, very hot, and poisonous, but nowhere near an atomic explosion. Niels Bohr calculated exactly how much energy a meltdown would produce : 200 million electron-volts PER split atom. The principle that guides bomb development was still missing 2 concepts : enrichment and the discovery of "critical mass".

      Incidentally, Otto Hahn was part of the nazi nuclear weapon development program (in fact he was the one that suggested the Nazi's start one). Enrichment was eventually mostly perfected by Otto Hahn, in parallel with the enrichment accomplishments in the Manhattan program.

      Critical mass, the actual direct cause for an explosion (nazi weaponization of nuclear power at that point was mostly focused on e.g. launching bombs with it, or producing oil with it, that sort of stuff), was discovered by Francis Perrin.

      Then, in 1939, all elements to produce a working atomic bomb were in place. Eventually, while Otto Hahn has in fact drawn up plans that would have worked before the Americans had a working plan, the Americans were the first to get a working atomic bomb in July 1945, a month after the fall of the third reich.

    7. Re:Many boffins died ... by martyros · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the quote from Heisenberg in the article is particularly interesting:

      "We definitely did not want to get into this bomb business," said Heisenberg. "I wouldn't like to idealize this; we did this also for our personal safety. We thought that the probability that this would lead to atomic bombs during the War was nearly zero. If we had done otherwise, and if many thousand people had been put to work on it and then if nothing had been developed, this could have had extremely disagreeable consequences for us."

      In other words, simple-minded tyrants think that the best way to motivate people is to say, "Make this happen or die." (And less powerful but just as simple-minded people in the workplace use "Make this happen or lose your job.") But one result is that no one is willing to suggest the idea of anything moderately risky, for fear that they'll be put to work on making that happen, and punished when it can't be done.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    8. Re:Many boffins died ... by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you take 2 H and make an He, the mass of the products does not equal that of the reactants. Some mass is lost through the process and is converted into energy which is what gives the bomb is power. It's also what makes the Sun hot as well.

      --
      try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
    9. Re:Many boffins died ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I didn't say ANY of them were FROM Germany.

      Teller left Hungary when he was 18 and completed his undergraduate and graduate training in Germany. Wigner was also educated in Germany and worked there until he moved to the US, around the same time the Nazis were gaining power. Szilard also did much of his training in Germany and worked there for some time before fleeing the Nazis.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Teller
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Wigner
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leó_Szilárd

    10. Re:Many boffins died ... by idontgno · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically, Einstein didn't draft the letter. Leó Szilárd wrote the letter and convinced Einstein to sign it, mostly for credibility purposes.

      Wikipedia linky.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:Many boffins died ... by PerfectionLost · · Score: 2, Informative

      The sun is a mass of incandescent gas
      A gigantic nuclear furnace
      where hydrogen is built into helium
      at a temperature of millions of degrees

      http://www.mudslide.net/TMBG/Albums/tmbg-ws.html

    12. Re:Many boffins died ... by pugugly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A notation appended to my Evil Overlord list now -

      "I will never say 'Make this happen or die.' I will say 'Whatcha Got?' "

      Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  2. Elsewhere in the scrapeyard... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    An irradiated lead refrigerator with the body of the legendary tomb raider Indiana Jones was also discovered.

    1. Re:Elsewhere in the scrapeyard... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is it true that Schrodinger's cat was feeding upon the remains?

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    2. Re:Elsewhere in the scrapeyard... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes and no.

    3. Re:Elsewhere in the scrapeyard... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Curiosity killed the cat.

      Or it didn't.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  3. Doesn't address the most interesting issue by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's been a lot of controversy over whether Heisenberg deliberately sabotaged the Nazi bomb-making or whether he tried to help but was incompetent or whether the failure was due to factors beyond Heisenberg. Although I have not read the book, I've been told that Paul Rose's book "Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project" presents a strong case that Heisenberg tried his hardest to assist the Nazi regime in the building of the atom bomb.

    1. Re:Doesn't address the most interesting issue by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's been a lot of controversy over whether Heisenberg deliberately sabotaged the Nazi bomb-making or whether he tried to help but was incompetent

      I guess we'll never really know. Maybe it was both.

    2. Re:Doesn't address the most interesting issue by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everybody should read "Copenhagen" at some point, it's really the first and last word on this issue. There's very little in the historical record to guide us to the 'right' answer to the question of what Bohr or Heisenberg were trying to accomplsh, the best we can do is consider the different possibilities.

      Whatever happened, thank G-d Bohr didn't ask Heisenberg if he'd double checked his reaction cross-section radius...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    3. Re:Doesn't address the most interesting issue by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The longer it takes for the joke to sink in, the funnier it is.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:Doesn't address the most interesting issue by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess we'll never really know. Maybe it was both.

      We do really know. There is no plausible answer to Michael Frayn's argument in his play "Cophenhagen". Ergo, the matter is incontrovertibly settled: there is simply no way that Heisenberg could have got his initial estimate of the mass of a uranium bomb so badly wrong (several tonnes) at Farm Hall if he had been working on such a project for the NAZIs.

      This is one of those controversies that has been going on for so long that there's a little industry built up around it, but like buggy-whip makers the product they are pushing is no longer much needed.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:Doesn't address the most interesting issue by thesandtiger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      G-d is a way of saying "God" without actually writing the name in a medium in which it will eventually be destroyed. Presumably, the poster was thanking their god for not allowing the Nazi's to get the bomb.

      Unless you were just being intentionally obtuse, as so many strident atheists are, and trying to draw attention to it - in which case, I ask you, please stop doing that. It makes it really easy for everyone to get pissed off at the rest of us who are atheist but don't feel the need to be jerks about it.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    6. Re:Doesn't address the most interesting issue by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess we'll never really know. Maybe it was both.

      We do really know..

      That sound you just heard? Yep, you got it. Whoosh

    7. Re:Doesn't address the most interesting issue by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is no plausible answer to Michael Frayn's argument in his play "Cophenhagen". Ergo, the matter is incontrovertibly settled: there is simply no way that Heisenberg could have got his initial estimate of the mass of a uranium bomb so badly wrong (several tonnes) at Farm Hall if he had been working on such a project for the NAZIs.

      You assume that research invariably produces an incontrovertible and utterly final answer - when nothing could be further from the truth.
       
      Take for example, from the Manhattan Project, the discovery of Plutonium's sensitivity to predetonation. When the fission properties of Plutonium were first explored, it was discovered and 'proven' that Plutonium would work in a gun type bomb. Later, when the properties were being studied more intensely (to refine the bombs design), and completely unexpectedly, Plutonium showed an apparent change in it's fission properties - tending to explode early, well before the [gun type] bomb could reach anything approaching it's theoretical performance. (In other words it would fizzle.) Worse yet, different samples showed different performances, and when the same samples were shipped to Berkley they showed performance not only different from their original research there, but also different from Los Alamos.
       
      In the end it turned out that the difference in location of testing was one of the two keys - Los Alamos, being at higher altitude than Berkley, was subjected to a higher flux of cosmic rays. Those cosmic rays were fissioning P-240 that was present in the samples. The effect had not been previously discovered because the original (accelerator bred) had a far lower level of P-240 contamination than the (reactor bred) samples later used at Los Alamos. (And that the P-240 contamination level depended on the irradiation schedule and level during production.) The scientists had known about the P-240 contamination, but had originally dismissed it.
       
      The entire Plutonium bomb project had to be redirected to discover a method of assembling a supercritical mass of Plutonium orders of magnitude faster than was possible in a gun - resulting ultimately in the implosion bomb. The production schedule at Hanford had to be modified to control the breeding of P-240.
       
      Hell, speaking of Hanford, the reactors there (built according the best research of the time), failed to work initially because of a previously unsuspected decay chain and daughter product poisoning the reactions within the reactor.
       
       

      This is one of those controversies that has been going on for so long that there's a little industry built up around it, but like buggy-whip makers the product they are pushing is no longer much needed.

      This belief only exists among those who aren't actually conversant with the history of the development of nuclear arms. (And those who wish to find a 'hero' who stood up not only against the Nazi's but against nuclear arms.)

  4. Fun trivia by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fun trivia: Joachimsthal mine is where we get the modern word "dollar." Silver extracted from this mine was minted to attest its purity and the coin thus produced was called a "thaler." TH is a relatively unusual consonant sound in many languages, and corrupts to D in romance languages like French, and here we are.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    1. Re:Fun trivia by _merlin · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'll find that Romance languages is the accepted English term for the language group including French, Italian and Spanish. The name for the group including English, Dutch and German is Germanic languages. (Not the capitalisation, too.)

  5. Politics by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The issue of Heisenberg, and any theoretical physicist being treated like a pariah (and thus dooming Nazi Germany's atom bomb program) is very instructive. The Nazi's made a political and ideological decision, to wit:

    Quantum mechanics and general relativity is all about 'relativism' and 'ambiguity,' and is unworthy of Aryan science. It's emphasis on relative physical laws and indeterminacy are endemic of its moral turpitude and obvious Jewish origins.

    They would then cast about trying to find every white atheist physicist who had doubts about 20th century physics, and then give them huge grants, fat think tank jobs, and would promote their work to the moon and back. On the other hand they would work to suppress the contributions of people like Lise Meitner, who used the 'Jewish physics' to provide them with proof of the first lab fission reaction.

    I suppose there's some sort of argument pro or con of climate change in this... exercise for the reader.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    1. Re:Politics by grouchomarxist · · Score: 4, Informative

      Atheist? Perhaps non-Jewish, but I've never heard of the Nazi's having an inclination to promote a person *because* they were atheist, as opposed to Protestant or Catholic.

      The Nazi's were at least superficially Christian and opposed atheism:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler's_religious_views#Hitler.27s_reaction_to_atheism
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany

      Or perhaps you mistyped and mean Aryan.

    2. Re:Politics by grouchomarxist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Judging by the wiki articles, perhaps not the best sources but they're readily available, both Himmler and Rosenberg believed in some kind of Aryan religion which was an aspect of the Nazi movement. Neither appear to have publicly declared themselves to be atheists.

    3. Re:Politics by hachete · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah hem: a WW2 Wehrmacht belt.

      http://snyderstreasures.com/pages/buckles.htm

      Please go peddle your propaganda somewhere else.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    4. Re:Politics by buzzn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wehrmacht != Nazi. The Nazis were the political party in charge, and the Wermacht was the regular professional army. This is in no way to excuse the Wermacht, and many soldiers were Nazis, but we remind that the belt buckle of an ordinary soldier does not reflect the much more extreme values of the dictatorship, which imprisoned or executed many christian clergy for opposing the regime. The Nazis swept away anyone that opposed their power, and their religion was power.

      --
      Join the window installer's union, where prosperity is a brick throw away!
    5. Re:Politics by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, Einstein and his theories were outcast in the "German Physics" the nazi were building. Einstein was jewish and traitor in their eyes. The nazis really lacked science buffs in their government. They had some success in rewriting history, in creating a non-jewish litterature, they did not understand why it could not be possible to make a non-jewish physics. They did not understand that Einstein was not an author of his laws, but a mere discoverer.

      It is very interesting to look into the "Uranium Verein", the nazi nuclear program. Considering all the very good scientists they had, and the good infrastructure that existed at this time, they should have succeed way before US. But they had Bohr leave, they had Pauli leave, they had Einstein leave. More than Einstein, they put Heisenberg as a leading person, despite him being a poor experimenter (but a very good theorician) the good experimenter at the time was too suspicious because he kept having jewish assistant and protesting about their disappearance. It also didn't help that many of the scientific team had to serve some time on the front (and one or two died). The whole program is an example of bright people hindered by poor management, it is fascinationg to read.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    6. Re:Politics by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your post misses the mark: Nazis were not opposed to Christian scientists. They were against Jewish scientists. Against as in, first they marginalized them, made it difficult for them to work, then to find a job and finally (if the scientists and their family were stil residing in Germany or a Nazi-occupied country) deported to a concentration camp and gassed.

      Germany COULD have had a nuclear weapon before the allies, if only they didn't engage in their futile/counterproductive policy of extermination, genocde and racial discrimination against Jews. Scientists like Szilard (father of nuclear fission) would have stayed in Germany instead of moving to the USA where they then worked on the Manhattan project.

      And a note at the end: had the Nazis had a nuclear weapon, it would have changed the course of history. They didn't necessarily need more than one, either: just blow up one major USSR city (say, Moscow) and watch the Eastern front fold up and a truce being signed.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:Politics by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'd put it this way. The Nazis, intellectually speaking, weren't anything.

      Tyrannies of that type use ideology, but aren't about ideology. Trying to take their "ideologies" seriously as ideologies only leads to confusion, because they weren't interested in consistency, much less truth. They used language purely for its utility.

      Take their idea of "Jewish science". You can't take that notion seriously, because it's all a fantasy they cooked up to target people they were afraid of. So they just lump them in together. It's telling that Himmler wanted to label Heisenberg as a "White Jew". "Jew" doesn't mean "person of historically Jewish descent" or "person who adheres to the Jewish law". It's just the verbal equivalent of a punch in the face.

      The same goes for Hitler's views about atheists. Atheists tend to be free thinkers, and therefore likely to oppose the regime. So you take two despised groups and you manufacture a bigger "threat" by glomming them together.

      Scapegoating is so critical to tyranny that where there aren't ready made hatreds, the tyrant invents groups to be hated. Stalin invented the "kulik", or rich peasant, as the scapegoat for his failed agricultural policies. They kuliks weren't rich by any means, but if your family were starving and your neighbor's had food, that gave you a satisfying, concrete target for your rage right within reach.

      As far as the "Christianity" is concerned, it's about as meaningful as their notion of "Jew". If they'd been living in a predominantly Buddhist society, they'd be filling their propaganda with Buddhist trappings. If they'd been living in a Jewish society, then they'd avail themselves of Jewish symbols and scapegoat Christians and Muslims.

      You can connect what the tyrant wants to what he says in this way: The tyrant wants power. To obtain and hold onto it, he needs a compliant people. To make the people compliant, he arouses fear, anger and hatred in them. To arouse those emotions he uses words, not to tell people anything, but to goad them.

      Hatred and fear are for the politician like the nose ring a farmer puts on a bull. It allows him to safely lead a big, dumb dangerous animal where he wants it to go. This works for both right wing tyrants and left wing tyrants like Stalin. Remember that next time you are tempted to latch on to some popular political hatred.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Politics by careysub · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Germany simply didn't have the spare industrial capacity to build installations of this magnitude without serious reprecussions on their war effort. As well the design of these facilities are pretty obvious (and large) making them perfect targets for the 8th Airforce

      These exact same arguments can be made about the V-2 project, that consumed 2 billion Reichsmarks (1.2 billion US $ at the time, about 70% of the budget of the Manhattan Project during the war) late in the war for negligible real contribution to the war effort.

      The Mittlewerk V-2 plant was bombed many times, but being built underground of reinformed concrete, it was never put out of operation.

      These same resources could have provided a robust nuclear weapons program (but no bomb by the end of the war).

      Most surprising is Germany's failure to have a vigorous R&D effort early in the war on uranium. The cost of such a project would have been small (compared to the huge costs of industrial production) a few tens of million of RM over 2-3 years. They had two strong motivations to do this, even if they thought no atomic bomb was possible during the war.

      1. If Germany had "won the war" (defeat of the USSR, undisputed control over continental Europe, and the Anglo-American world suing for peace) they still would face a hostile Britain and U.S. even after an armistice. Given the precedent of WWI and WWII another round 10-20 years down the road seemed likely. Staying ahead of the Anglo-Americans in atomic technology would have been essential even in a victorious scenario.

      2. Using uranium as a source of power seemed much easier, and the French were actively pursuing this in 1940 before defeat. The US Navy started its own independent uranium program to build reactors to power submarines around this time. To Germany - outclassed in Naval power and needing to sever the sea supply line of the UK and USSR - the possibility of a uranium powered U-boat should have given the German Navy and Hitler thrills of a well-nigh sexual nature. Yet no serious effort was devoted to exploring this.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  6. Time for bed by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

    I misread that as "Lost Nazi Uniforms Found in a Dutch Scrapyard" and failed to see why that would make news.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  7. 2080 by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    2080: "Toldja Iraq had WMD's"

  8. Re:quick, someone call Clive Cussler! by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's no such thing as a *new* Dirk Pitt novel, they all have roughly the same plot.

  9. Boffin by burningcpu · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case any of you Americans were wondering what a Boffin is, it is a scientist. Here is a quote from wikipedia,

    "In the slang of the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, India and South Africa, boffins are scientists, medical doctors, engineers, and other people engaged in technical or scientific research.
    The word 'boffin' (or 'boff'—often as an insult[1]) can also be used to refer to any particularly clever person. The closest American equivalent is "egghead"."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boffin

    1. Re:Boffin by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought they were the ones who told the rebel alliance about the second Death star at endor....IT'S A TRAP.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  10. They all went to the moon anyway by Snaller · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought we were all clear on that.

    http://www.ironsky.net/site/index.php#teaser

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  11. No by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Funny

    French is the language of romance, but I understand that as a slashdotter, you might not know this. I read it in a book. Very intresting apparently it all is designed to lead to sex, whatever that might be. Further reading might be in order.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  12. Re:Die judischen by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Informative

    GP is not a German. His text was clearly machine-translated, so is yours, leading to very funny statements.

    Yours basically means: Hey, a mute bottom, you have lost the war - another thing that you siphon.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  13. Re:quick, someone call Clive Cussler! by HalifaxRage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What, you mean the one about smugglers? I thought he stole that from ~275 Hardy Boys books.

    --
    bomb the us up set someone
  14. Excellent book about Nazi uranium project by Mendenhall · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is a truly excellent book, "Hitler's Uranium Club" which documents what the Germans themselves said about their efforts. It is edited by Jeremy Bernstein. It is a collection of transcriptions of conversations among the leading German scientists (Heisenberg, Laue, etc., not all of whom were actually doing nuclear physics), who were captured lat in the war and transferred to Farm Hall in England. They were recorded secretly, so what is said is very candid.

    Anyone interested in this history should definitely read the book. The conversations run the gamut from very technical, to various fights over social issues.

     

  15. The Nazi Holocaust was a Christian pogrom by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Nazi's were at least superficially Christian and opposed atheism:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler's_religious_views#Hitler.27s_reaction_to_atheism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany

    The Nazis were more than just superficially Christian, most of them were very Christian, and had the overt support of the leadership of both the two main Christinan churches in Germany at the time (Catholic and Lutheren), for both the party in general and the policy of exterminating the Jews in particular.

    The reason so many people believe the Nazis were athiests is because of a couple of quotes taken out of context, and because the Catholic church has spared no expense (or Jesuit historian) rewriting history and glossing over their own involvement in both the policies and the atrocities. Indeed, they've even managed to gloss over the fact that Hitler was quite devoutly Catholic (and not particularly out of character in his behaviour--just look at how Columbus treated the natives of the West Indies, or Cortez the Mayans and Aztecs, or...the list goes on, ad nauseum, all with the blessing, both tacit and overt, of the Catholic Christian authorities).

    This actually becomes more obviuos when you look at the longer history of Catholic pogroms and inquisitions against the Jews that litter the history of Europe. The Nazi holocaust is merely the latest and most notorious. What a coup, to help organise and support such a massive Christian pogrom against a people, then send out your cadres of revisionist "historians" to recharacterise those responsible not as fellow Christians, but as Athiests...about the only group who wouldn't be inclined to support, much less lead, a pogrom against a population simply because their ancesters are rumourted to have cricified one of their deities two thousand years earlier.

    Indeed, as you note, the Nazis came after Athiests with much the same ferver as todays Teabaggers, Truthers, and other right-wing zealots. Some things never change.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:The Nazi Holocaust was a Christian pogrom by Kismet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Carrol Quigley disagrees with you. But then, you probably accuse him of being the Jesuit historian who "re-wrote" history.

      This is the usual way with "debunkers" who seek to tear down a mass movement in order to supplant it with another. Hitler desperately needed a Jewish devil, so he accused the Jews of rewriting their history. Actually, it was Hitler who invented a new history in which the Jew became a sub-human perpetrator of evil. In the same way, as you have demonstrated, the anti-Christian demands a Christian devil and will commonly accuse Christians of rewriting their own history (the same accusation is frequently leveled against any of the numerous denominations: Catholic, Protestant, Mormon, etc). Typically this is accompanied by a certain "guilt by association" argument. In your case, not only is Christianity associated with Nazism according to your own flavor of revisionist history, but it becomes the driving force behind it. Christian zealots are now to be blamed for every major ill the world has ever seen, including the holocaust. Christians are sub-human genocidal maniacs. Where do we go from there?

      Make no mistake: the Nazi movement was not a Christian movement, nor were it's principal roots found in Christianity. While plenty of Christians were sucked into the movement itself (mass movements are interchangeable, as Eric Hoffer pointed out; it is the quality of the belief rather than the thing believed in that is important to the True Believer), Hitler viewed all religion as competition to his own power. Hitler had no god but power. Nazism was merely one possible reification of Nietzsche's philosophy combined with any other power doctrines that could be extracted from social Darwinism, paganism, Christianity, and so forth.

  16. Re:quick, someone call Clive Cussler! by u38cg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dirk Pitt here, stuck in a cave/submarine/aircraft/other contrived and dangerous situation at the start of my latest novel, and I'd just like to take a few moments (checks Doxa dive watch) to disagree with you, I never repeat plot elements. Once I get out of my current contrived situation, I'm going to hook up with Loren and do something that'll really surprise you. So there. Now where that little Italian guy?

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  17. Interesting That This Was Not Congo Uranium by careysub · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The fact this can be traced to production batches at Joachimstal during the war is interesting for the following reason: it was a mine incapable of supporting a nuclear weapon program.

    Joachimstal (Jachymov today) is an ancient and famous mining district (others have noted here that Thaler == Dollar originated from its name) and due to radon gas in its mine is also the earliest recorded incidences of death from occupational radiation exposure - - - lung cancer was a common cause of death of underground miners from the 16th century onward. It was also a prominent source of material for the discovery of radiation and radioactive elements.

    But it could only produce a few tens of tons of uranium annually! Something like a 1000 tons of uranium was needed to support an effective nuclear weapons program.

    Germany had however a couple of thousand tons of already mined and processed ore from the Belgian Congo, captured at the outset of the war. This material was perfect for a nuclear weapons program - if it had one. This material was captured by the U.S. at the end of the war unused. A couple of thousand tons of ore from this same mine and shipped to the U.S. before the war in fact powered the Manhattan Project through most of its wartime operations.

    That Germany was still relying on old pre-war supply arrangements through Joamchimstal to obtain research uranium is very interesting. It is another manifestation of the failure to create a real weapons program.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj