Slashdot Mirror


Gates and MS Don't See Eye-To-Eye On CO2

Sam Machkovech writes "Bill Gates's speech at last week's TED Conference centered on 'moving to zero-carbon energy, and our need to reduce CO2 emissions 80% by 2050.' His choice of subject was an abrupt turn from The Gates Foundation's typical humanitarian topics, but he insisted that energy innovation is crucial to his Foundation's goals. A move by Microsoft today proves that Gates's old company has less interest in that carbon-neutral goal — Microsoft has begun campaigning against a bridge redesign that would result in more bus and transit options for commuters between Seattle and the company's homebase of Redmond, WA."

12 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. wait, what...? by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    "moving to zero-carbon energy"

    That would be the end of life as we know it. Quite literally, as a matter of fact, since we're all made of carbon.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:wait, what...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go and sequester yourself.

    2. Re:wait, what...? by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are hereby awarded 1 "I was retardedly obtuse on the internets on purpose" merit badge.

      Congratulations.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:wait, what...? by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be the end of life as we know it. Quite literally, as a matter of fact, since we're all made of carbon.

      Bah. I'm nitrogen-based, so the only thing I'll need to worry about is head shoulders shampoo.

    4. Re:wait, what...? by Idiomatick · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think 'zero-carbon energy' implies that we could no longer use humans as fuel.

    5. Re:wait, what...? by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah. I'm nitrogen-based, so the only thing I'll need to worry about is head shoulders shampoo.

      Dude, all I have to do is inhale and I will end you.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    6. Re:wait, what...? by girlintraining · · Score: 1, Funny

      Go and sequester yourself.

      I already did that in the shower this morning. Your point? :P

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  2. I don't even need RTFA by oldhack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, MS is opposing the redesign because it needs to pump CO2, obviously.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  3. Wait a sec if they take different sides by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Then which side are us slashdot'ers supposed to hate?

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  4. Re:troll... by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm pretty sure they've already de-trolled the area. It's a nasty process evicting a troll from his home once he's settled in.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  5. Re:Devil's advocate by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

    The sad thing is that environmentalists have a sort of knee jerk reaction every time they hear the word nuclear, even though it is the only power source that is cheap, safe, and good for the environment. The only people who oppose it are the ignorant (Nuclear Power means Nuclear War!) or people who think life would be AWESOME if we could all go back to living in caves.

    Wow, you have created some sort of God-Emperor of Strawmen there.

  6. So? by legio_noctis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seeing as Bill Gates no longer works at Microsoft, I doubt they see eye-to-eye at all. Nor do they need to, or we to know whether or nether they are.