Slashdot Mirror


California Legislature Declares "Cuss-Free" Week

shewfig writes "The California legislature, which previously tried to ban incandescent light bulbs, just added to the list of banned things ... swear words! Fortunately, the measure only applies for the first week of March, and compliance is voluntary — although, apparently, there will be a 'swear jar' in the Assembly and the Governor's mansion. No word yet on whether the Governator intends to comply."

45 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. CA must be on easy street by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what a fucking waste of time

    --
    This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    1. Re:CA must be on easy street by brainboyz · · Score: 4, Funny

      No fucking shit. Especially since this forsaken shithole is practically broke because of these dim witted bitches and their cock-biting agendas.

      On a related note, the Facebook response is a group called "Fuck Week." I didn't join, but I was quite amused.

    2. Re:CA must be on easy street by Mistlefoot · · Score: 4, Funny

      California? As in:

      "For some time now I have lamented the fact that major issues are overlooked while many
      Unnecessary bills come to me for consideration. Water reform, prison reform, and health
      Care are major issues my Administration has brought to the table, but the Legislature just
      Kicks the can down the alley.

      Yet another legislative year has come and gone without the major reforms Californians
      Overwhelmingly deserve. In light of this, and after careful consideration, I believe it is
      Unnecessary to sign this measure at this time."

    3. Re:CA must be on easy street by j-turkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those California legislators are totally un-politically correct. This bill is insensitive to people with Tourette syndrome.

      --

      -Turkey

    4. Re:CA must be on easy street by mmontour · · Score: 4, Funny

      WARNING: This thread contains words known to the State of California to cause offense and hurt feelings or other psychological harm.

      Please ensure that future discussions on this topic are RoHL (reduction of harsh language) compliant.

    5. Re:CA must be on easy street by Jurily · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Half the words in the dictionary can "cause offense and hurt feelings or other psychological harm", if used the right way.

    6. Re:CA must be on easy street by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can just see a few hundred robocallers swearing at california.

      They wouldn't be noticed among the tens of thousands of humans calling every day to swear at the gubbimint.

    7. Re:CA must be on easy street by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
      You missed the point. Here, let me fix it for you,

      For some time now I have lamented the fact that major issues are overlooked while many
      Unnecessary bills come to me for consideration. Water reform, prison reform, and health
      Care are major issues my Administration has brought to the table, but the Legislature just
      Kicks the can down the alley.

      Yet another legislative year has come and gone without the major reforms Californians
      Overwhelmingly deserve. In light of this, and after careful consideration, I believe it is
      Unnecessary to sign this measure at this time."

    8. Re:CA must be on easy street by bertoelcon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Half the words in the dictionary can "cause offense and hurt feelings or other psychological harm", if used the right way.

      The other half can "cause offense and hurt feelings or other psychological harm" if used in the wrong way.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
  2. May I be the first one to say by mudshark · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fuck that.

    --
    In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
    1. Re:May I be the first one to say by glenn.ramsey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Speaking as a "rampant cusser" myself, I can say that I am in now way "stickin' it to the Man" when I use curse words. Truth be told, I'll never fully understand why words get classified as curse words. They're simply another part of language used to convey extreme emotions. Sure, one could choose other words to display such emotions, but would it be as effective and why? Is it because some group of people decided that such words are offensive and this classification has been propagated throughout the generations? I say fuck that (I say that I do not agree with such arbitrary classification of said words). See the difference in emotion conveyed? Was anybody harmed by my wording? This world has become far too politically correct, and with no reason. If you can substantiate the classification of curse words with cases of where harm has come to a person because of their use, please do, I'd love to hear it.

    2. Re:May I be the first one to say by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2

      Sticks and Stones man. If these words could kill it'd be another issue. Explicatives and slang have now become casual english.

      And that makes it ok to deliberately offend people?

      Expletives (not "explicatives") are completely unnecessary in the forms they are most commonly used. Specifically, they do not add meaning to the sentence; they're merely an attempt to convey emotion or add "shock value". Take, for example, the common use of the "f-word":

      "That f-ing dog bit me!"

      Given that the dog was not actually attempting to copulate with anything, using the expletive adds no meaning to the sentence.

      In this case, it is an attempt to convey the victim's anger toward the dog, which is something already conveyed by vocal tone and physical indicators.

      However, that particular use is understandable. This, however, is not:

      "You're a f-ing moron."

      Again assuming the moron is not attempting to copulate with anything, what meaning does the expletive convey? None. We already understand the speaker's opinion of the moron, because, well, he's being called a moron. There is presumably disdain in the speaker's voice and some equivalent expression on his face.

      It's an attempt to add "shock value" - an attempt to further offend the recipient of the insult by using expletives.

      What's worse, so many people have allowed their vocabulary to shrink to the point where they use few adjectives which aren't expletives; there are many people who use them in place of other more appropriate adjectives in normal conversation, or to fill a void in the flow of their conversation when they can't think of the word they mean to say (i.e. to replace "um"):

      "I was going to the store to buy a... f-ing... to buy a lawnmower..."

      This of course adds no value and actually distracts the listener from the topic of conversation (unless of course the listener also has this habit).

      It's not helped by the fact that people with large vocabularies are nowadays viewed as pretentious merely for using the words at their command. It's sad that so many people look down on others for using real adjectives instead of adjectives derived from expletives.

    3. Re:May I be the first one to say by russotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that makes it ok to deliberately offend people?

      If people are offended by swear words not directed at them, the problem lies with them and not the speaker.

      "That f-ing dog bit me!"

      Given that the dog was not actually attempting to copulate with anything, using the expletive adds no meaning to the sentence.

      Number one, it's a dog; it probably was trying to copulate with something, perhaps the leg of the victim. Number two, conveying emotion is a perfectly valid use of language.

      Use of expletives as an intensifier, as in "You're a fucking moron", is also a perfectly valid use of language. If you object to deliberately offending people, it's not the expletive which is the problem.

    4. Re:May I be the first one to say by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Respect has to start somewhere. If everyone goes by your own plan - "I'll be nice as soon as everyone else is nice" - then nobody will ever be nice.

      That's a pretty simple concept. If you refuse to be a source of respect, then you're just part of the problem.

  3. Fuck you, asshole by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Give me your clothes.

    1. Re:Fuck you, asshole by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How delightful. The first post to be moderated offtopic quotes cussing uttered by the governor of California in one of his better known roles, thereby making it relevant to the subject on two levels Where are my mod points when I really need them?

  4. Of course by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course, this story is going to generate the largest collection of cuss-word containing posts that Slashdot has seen in months. Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Of course by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.

      Not this one. Belgium.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    2. Re:Of course by sconeu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh come on. There is absolutely no way in hell that Slashdot could be considered a Serious Screenplay.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  5. Granola by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fruits,
    Nuts,
    Flakes,
    Pelosi
    .
    .
    .
    Profit?

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  6. working hard...or by TornCityVenz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good to see that with schools going down the toilet, a budget spirally out of control and more and more companies moving out of the area...the legislature is hard at work.

    --
    I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
    1. Re:working hard...or by Knara · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next they'll make a law that states people have the right to not be offended on the Internet.

  7. Voluntary.... by headkase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .... For now.

    --
    Shh.
  8. swear jar in the Assembly by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, that sure beats the shit out of raising taxes!

  9. Just one thing, Dude... by orthancstone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do ya have to use so many cuss words?

    1. Re:Just one thing, Dude... by hldn · · Score: 2, Informative

      the fuck you talkin about?

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    2. Re:Just one thing, Dude... by orthancstone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have it your way Dude.

  10. Great Way to Raise Revenue by thedbp · · Score: 2, Funny

    They can appeal to the Moral "Majority" by saying "Hey! Let's not swear for a week, and we'll set up a swear jar too!" but really what they're saying is "Hey, you cocksucker motherfuckers! We fucking know you can't control your goddamn language you bastards, so cough up some fucking dough!" Great way to get some money in CA's coffers. They are struggling, and with all the filthy language that flies around that very liberal patch of land, this could very well lead to serious revenue.

    Yes, I'm being facetious.

  11. Re:God damn idiots by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They're doing that because they can't do anything else. Governments with their backs against the fiscal wall frequently start banning everything in sight. Banning is cheap, because inevitably they never put any money into enforcement, or in cases like cell phone driving bans, they let the cops go crazy with fines as a backdoor revenue generator. In any case, when you see a government get on the "ban this ban that" bandwagon, it means they're broke, can't actually pass any legislation that would in fact do anybody any good, but still need to justify their salaries.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  12. Role Models by Tsiangkun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Frequently I like to embrace the role models in our government and
    use word placement to make a point. Arnold did this, and it was
    clear what his intentions were. I applaud our government for
    keeping their promises on this critical piece of legislation.

    Year after year tax payer money gets thrown away on
    one stupid idea after another. Unless we can educated the
    uneducated, these movie stars will continue to rule.

    America needs leadership that can dedicate a week to getting
    results. A week just to stop swearing at each other, that is
    not even a good start. We need a week away from faith in
    our markets to fix everything. We need a week of using
    logic to solve problems. We need to vote third party, the
    democrats and republics are colluding, but they call it compromise.

  13. Re:Anonymous Coward.... by ElKry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Coincidentally, the very same movie that talks about President Schwarzenegger and the amendments to the Constitution made to allow him to run for President of the USA.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. The obligatory by sdnoob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Shit
    Piss
    Fuck
    Cunt
    Cocksucker
    Motherfucker
    Tits

  16. Take credit cards? by Ostracus · · Score: 5, Funny

    " Fortunately, the measure only for the first week of March, and compliance is voluntary — although, apparently, there will be a 'swear jar' in the Assembly and the Governor's mansion. No word yet on whether the Governator intends to comply.""

    Governors office:
    Scene: Two aides about to get chewed out.
    Governor walks over to the swear jar and puts in a $100. Apparently it's going to be a long night.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  17. Shades of "Demolition Man" by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Give them at ticket every time they swear, and at least they'll have something to wipe their ass with!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  18. Motion seconded, do we have quarum? by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

    You've never felt the need to push the button labeled: "DO NOT PRESS"?

    "the Man" is in California, and he's telling people not to cuss for a week. By cussing in response, we are showing that his efforts to control others is only bringing about more of the very activity that he hopes to diminish. Any legislature that seeks to restrict the people should be met with such an attitude. I'd say it's what a good citizen would do.

    So I'll second the motion,
    Fuck that.

  19. Re:Does anyone have the text of the resolution? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tits? seriously? Piss doesn't seem like a swear word anymore either.

    Tits doesn't even belong on the list, you know. It's such a friendly sounding word. It sounds like a nickname. 'Hey, Tits, come here. Tits, meet Toots, Toots, Tits, Tits, Toots.' It sounds like a snack doesn't it? Yes, I know, it is, right. But I don't mean the sexist snack, I mean, New Nabisco Tits. The new Cheese Tits, and Corn Tits and Pizza Tits, Sesame Tits Onion Tits, Tater Tits, Yeah. Betcha can't eat just one. That's true I usually switch off . But I mean that word does not belong on the list.

    -snip-

    The reason Piss and Cunt are on the list is that a long time ago certain ladies said 'Those are the two I am not going to say. I don't mind Fuck and Shit, but P and C are out. P and C are out.' Which led to such stupid sentences as 'OK, you fuckers, I am going to tinkle now.'

    RIP George, you dead fucker.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  20. I've seen this before.. by Pinky · · Score: 2

    The next step is to put a little box on the wall with speech recognition. Then it could print out a fine automatically..

    ".. you have been fined 1 credit for a violation of the verbal morality..."

  21. Actually, I can see an upside by weston · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Profanity often can nudge interaction towards less restrained and thoughtful expression. The budget didn't spiral out of control by itself; it broke down because of (a) the laws surrounding how budgeting is to be done (b) the fact that the two parties couldn't work with each other.

    Discouraging profanity won't fix problem (a), but it might make problem (b) somewhat more tractable.

  22. The Governator by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Governator responded with his catchphrase, "Fuck you asshole," which previously he only used in his R-rated movies. He then added, "You are one ugly motherfucker."

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  23. There's a madness to this reason by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Informative

    Too many people were swearing at the legislature for their brain dead performance, so this is how they fix it.

  24. Wow. Embarrassing! by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think I've ever said this before, but this actually makes me embarrassed to be a Californian.

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
  25. Re:What's wrong swith cuss words? by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm glad you brought this up. Let me turn this question around a bit.

    I'm not actively offended by profanity. I grew up with it, hear it at work, in the media--about like we all do, I suppose. But even if I'm not actively offended by it, I'm not actively impressed by it either. Are you?

    I suppose I may have had a bit of a "brainwashed upbringing" in that I had parents who were concerned that I learn to speak English well and communicate effectively. English is a language with an extraordinarily broad and varied vocabulary--in part because it's borrowed so heavily from so many other languages. When I hear a person who seems unable to construct a sentence without using four letter words--for whom "fuck" and its variants act as noun, adjective, pronoun and/or verb without any apparent notion of what that word actually denotes--I admit that at first blush I'm probably going to have a low opinion of that person. If I were an employer, I wouldn't hire him or her. I wouldn't want him or her dating one of my children.

    I share your sentiment on "like" as a placeholder (I'm not too impressed by that either), but feel that even that is probably preferable to pointless (and invariably grammatically incorrect) references to sexual acts, excrement, and religious figures. And if you're making those references with a purpose to offend, are you really trying to communicate anything useful anyway?

  26. Fsck swearing by jamesh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fsck swearing... I want to hear them go a whole month (or even an hour) without saying any word starting with the letter 's' or something creative like that. The person that breaks the rule the most gets to sit on one of those seats over a tub of water that you throw tennis balls at a target and if you hit it dumps them in. Or even better, a bucket of slime over everyone's head that gets poured on them whenever they say "I don't know".