Slashdot Mirror


Iran Hacks US Spy Sites

superapecommando writes "Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps hacked into 29 websites affiliated with US espionage networks, Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency reported on Sunday. 'The hacked websites acted against Iran's national security under the cover of human rights activities,' Fars reported. It did not disclose details of the attacks. The Internet has been used by Iranian opposition groups who contested the results of last year's elections there to organize demonstrations and share information about protests and arrests. The Revolutionary Guards is a military group that was founded after Iran's 1979 revolution. The group includes conventional army, navy, air force, and intelligence units, as well as the Basij paramilitary force and various business units."

9 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Re:When are they by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who is the "they" you are referring to? Just to clarify, the Iranians themselves are claiming they hacked these sites, not the US.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  2. Re:Amazing by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Informative

    This still isn't a "cyberwar" this is just iran arresting human rights activists and calling them spies/traitor with a thin justification.

    Anything governments try is still lost in the noise http://www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/

  3. Worst summary ever by DJ+Jones · · Score: 4, Interesting
    • A website is a passive entity that serves content; there's no such thing as a proactive-espionage-"attack" website. Grow up.
    • They were Iranian human rights websites. The article says (in quotes) that the Fars news network drew a tie to US intelligence with no details to back up that claim.
    • Fars news somehow linked this incident to other US funded groups that were arrested on a different occasion? with no citation.

    First off, Fars news is the equivalent of Fox News in the US. They decide the news before it happens. Second off, the only thing worse than this crappy article with no references is CmdrTaco's poor summary of it that insinuates that the US was funding these sites even though the article says nothing about that being true.

  4. Re:Not 29 Web Sites by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wouldn't be surprised if they were CIA fronts

    That would surprise me. What wouldn't surprise me is if the 29 domains are all linked to the Iranian government. I think this is a ruse, designed to create the illusion that the Iranian government is a) capable enough to pre-emptively strike its "cyber attackers and b) to paint the Iranian government as a victim of attack, as opposed to the attacker.

  5. Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice headline. These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA's cyberwar infrastructure. More appropriate headline: "Iranian script kiddies take down website; blame US".

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  6. Re:Bad Article Title by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Iranian Government has been desperate to tie the current protests to US involvement. Without that connection they are beating up their own people, with the connection they are stopping "the great satan" from interfering in their internal affairs. I don't know why this surprises anyone, they put people to death a few weeks ago by saying they were working for the west. They are desperate to convince their own public that these election protests have been orchestrated by the US, in fact I would go so far as to say that the more paranoid members of their government are convinced of such and will do anything including manufacturing evidence of such to convince the general public they are right.

    If these protests are all internally comprised they are no better than the shah, and regardless of how they feel about things they don't want to have themselves compared to him. They greatly fear that what happened to the shah could happen to them, they must convince everyone that the US is involved so they justify their own repressive actions.

  7. you mean "ALLEGED" by wisebabo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never have I seen an article title more in need of the word "Alleged"

    As in: Iran Hacks ALLEGED US Spy Sites

    Like you are going to believe that "Iran's semi-official Fars News Agency" isn't going to make unsubstantiated claims? (I know double negative, but here it ain't wrong).

  8. Re:Spy Websites?!? by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

    They were only U.S. spy sites in the sense that officially no right thinking Iranian would be against the government, so it would have to be a CIA plot Q.E.D.

  9. Re:Not that I put a lot of trust in *our* reports by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nice headline. These idiots make it sound like the Basji took down the firewalls at Langley and laid waste to the CIA's cyberwar infrastructure. More appropriate headline: "Iranian script kiddies take down website; blame US".

    An even more accurate headline: "Iranian government takes down human rights websites, accusing them of 'espionage'."