Slashdot Mirror


China Criticizes Google's "US Ties"

krou writes "State-run news agency Xinhua has attacked what it calls Google's 'intricate ties with the US government' amongst its high level officials, claiming that it's 'an open secret that some security experts in the Pentagon are from Google.' They have also accused the company of trying to change Chinese society by imposing American values on it. Xinhua said that 'One company's ambition to change China's internet rules will only prove to be ridiculous.' Google has denied the claims. Google spokeswoman Jessica Powell said that 'The decision to review our business in China was entirely Google's and Google's alone.'"

40 of 280 comments (clear)

  1. Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that while some Internet users in certain Western countries may see the Internet as something which exists independently of society and is merely a medium through which two individuals may communicate, from the Chinese POV it is a part of society and therefore allowed to be controlled.

    To be totally honest, I agree with the Chinese POV, since $People \in Society$ and $Internetusers \subset Society$.

    1. Re:Let's not forget by ircmaxell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree with that POV. The internet is its own society which is free from cultural and geological borders. That's the power of the Internet. The fact that EVERYONE is equal, irregardless of their location, political beliefs, language, religion, etc, etc, etc makes it it's own society. When a country tries to limit or control the internet, it is either because they don't understand it, or they fear it. This is especially true in cultures of control such as China and Iran. They are afraid of the internet, because it gives people access to a truly free society. The failure here is that almost no government believes that the Internet is a sovereign society.

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    2. Re:Let's not forget by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree with that POV. The internet is its own society which is free from cultural and geological borders. That's the power of the Internet. The fact that EVERYONE is equal, irregardless of their location, political beliefs, language, religion, etc, etc, etc makes it it's own society. When a country tries to limit or control the internet, it is either because they don't understand it, or they fear it. This is especially true in cultures of control such as China and Iran. They are afraid of the internet, because it gives people access to a truly free society. The failure here is that almost no government believes that the Internet is a sovereign society.

      Is this why US law like DMCA is imposed to me even while I don't live in US? Google removes results based on DMCA notices on all of their sites, not just google.com.

      China tries to control it's own Internet. USA tries to control the whole Internet. Which one is worse?

    3. Re:Let's not forget by sopssa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't Xinhua correct in this though? There's no lies - Google tried to change Chinese society and bring American values in it, just like is done in Iraq but only with military.

      This is nothing new, the same has been done with Hollywood and other mass culture for long time. Just play Civilization - you can spread your culture and slowly your enemies cities will want to join you.

    4. Re:Let's not forget by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Informative

      so let me get this straight: google, which is located in the us, is being complained about for having connections in the US? And this is coming from the chinese news, which is located in china, and has connections with China? ror.

    5. Re:Let's not forget by forand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure what your point is; both are horrible for the internet at large. Saying that China is doing something similar to something the USA is doing does not make either OK.

    6. Re:Let's not forget by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google isn't the internet. Google is a US company, and it's subject to US laws. Nobody is stopping US citizens from visiting websites run by non-US companies, which would not be subject to US laws. In China, however, you would simply be prevented from viewing any site that was not controlled (explicitly, by law, or by some other agreement) by the Chinese government.

      The US is trying to control the world through treaties and trade agreements, not by web censorship.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    7. Re:Let's not forget by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The internet is its own society which is free from cultural and geological borders.

      This video contains content from Sony Pictures, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.

      WAS free. Past tense. And prepare for ACTA, this is only getting worse.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:Let's not forget by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you think the US has never taken down a foreign website you are sadly mistaken.

    9. Re:Let's not forget by icebraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize that, although you're not in the US, Google does. If you don't want to be restricted by US laws, maybe you shouldn't use the services of a North-American company...

    10. Re:Let's not forget by sopssa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The point is that both countries have their own view on what is allowed and what is not. The difference is that China only restricts it inside it's own country, while US tries to enforce their view all over the world (with ACTA too). It maybe doesn't make it OK, but in my view it's still a lot better when you aren't trying to enforce your views to people of other countries.

    11. Re:Let's not forget by denobug · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not really. Xhinhua is politicizing the situation where Google is attempting to receive protection from it OWN government when being intruded upon. Why is it a bad thing for Google to ask NSA for security assistance when their high profile account is being hacked with possible traces to the Chinese government? I am not saying Chinese government has a hand in it but the suspicion should warrant Google to seek governmental help to pin point the issue and prevent additional attack from happening.

      Let's not forget Google is a US registered company with headquarter in California. Their stock is listed in US stock exchange. They pay taxes to US government. Seeking help and protection from your own government is well within their rights as a US company.

      Further I don't think China has any leg on the issue either since they actively help their own industries and private companies with ties. It's all just a Publicity Stunt to keep its own citizen from sympathizing Google by playing a patriotic card.

    12. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ror.

      lacist asshore!

    13. Re:Let's not forget by SQL+Error · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China tries to control it's own Internet. USA tries to control the whole Internet. Which one is worse?

      China.

    14. Re:Let's not forget by AnotherUsername · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is this why US law like DMCA is imposed to me even while I don't live in US? Google removes results based on DMCA notices on all of their sites, not just google.com.

      China tries to control it's own Internet. USA tries to control the whole Internet. Which one is worse?

      So build your own search engine, open results entirely, and put it out for any to use. No one is stopping you. Well, unless you are in China.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    15. Re:Let's not forget by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't hold your breath. They said the same thing about the outdated US drug laws - "When all the Baby Boomers take charge, we will have a sensible drug policy in the US." Well, they have and I am still waiting. Seems the more things change the more they stay the same.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    16. Re:Let's not forget by superdave80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And what website was taken down? And how exactly did the US enforce this take down in a country that it has no power over?

    17. Re:Let's not forget by SilasMortimer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Isn't Xinhua correct in this though? There's no lies - Google tried to change Chinese society and bring American values in it, just like is done in Iraq but only with military.

      Google did no such thing. Google provides a service and China wants to restrict it. Furthermore, it wants Google to take on the responsibility of restricting what China wants restricted. Even if the people at Google were comfortable with the restrictions, which they have a right not to be, the cost to them of trying to enforce the Chinese government's rules is prohibitive. Makes it overall a bit stupid for Google to agree to anything.

      And you're saying there are no lies. So you say that Google has ties to the government? Even if you're a conspiracy nut, look at recent history with regards to how the US government handles China. What will you see? We've kissed their asses. US politicians always stand strong on American principles... except when power is involved. This is why we don't recognize the Turkish genocide of Armenians and it's why the Chinese can trample whatever human rights it wants to even outside of their own country.

      This is nothing new, the same has been done with Hollywood and other mass culture for long time. Just play Civilization - you can spread your culture and slowly your enemies cities will want to join you.

      You make it difficult for me to defend the effects of computer and video games to people who say that they stunt people's critical thinking skills.

      --
      Omnes tuae crepidines sunt nobis sunt. Ascendo tuum!
  2. Good grief! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Funny

    China is taking its lead from North Korea on the propaganda front?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Good grief! by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Xinhua is state run, so accusing a google of being a puppet of the government is kind of silly. Anyways, Chinese propaganda used to be a lot like the USSR's Pravda or KNCA today, but it's not quite that extreme anymore. That probably makes it more effective. I mean, don't people begin to catch on after 50 years of weekly "the west will experience nuclear armageddon at our hands" rants?

      "The matchless fighting spirit of the leader, who continued the forced march of high intensity to vibrant hard-fought fields for an upsurge throughout the year, burning his heart with noble love of his country and fellow people, gave free rein to the mental strength of all the service personnel and people and worked world-startling miracles across the country." -- KCNA, http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2010/201001/news01/20100101-08ee.html

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  3. OMG. Thank you, China. by Jawn98685 · · Score: 3, Funny

    My government is using the Internet to spy on me? Who knew?

  4. No NSA behind Google? by kubitus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Logic says can not be:

    :

    Secret Services/Intelligence must get information

    there is information in the internet

    where is information seeked for: in search enghines

    to know what is searched for you ought to sit behind a search engine, best Google

    and you can then also influence what is being found

    much cheaper than Echelon

    And in the answer streams from a search engine one can embedd other things such as trojans etc...

    QED

  5. Do we have to hear about every piece of propaganda by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ???

    If I wanted to read chinese propagada, I would go to the source:

    http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/

  6. Hello, China, reality calling by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google is behaving far more ethically than the State Department. If they were really Pentagon puppets, they'd be more concerned with trying to add 2% to the value of the Yuan rather than with trivial little things like free speech and political freedom.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  7. China is naive by testadicazzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China needs to learn that in the U.S. the corporations run the state, not the other way around.

  8. Ho ho ho. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While it would not at all surprise me if the relationship between aspects of the US intelligence apparatus and aspects of google is rather cozy(they'd merely be joining the long list of data broker companies for which that is true*cough* ChoicePoint, *cough* Acxiom, *cough*AT&T); it takes real chutzpah for a country where enterprises owned outright by the state and/or military are common, standard practice, to start moralizing about the shady and nebulous ties between google and America's spook infestation.

  9. Re:Do we have to hear about every piece of propaga by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ???

    If I wanted to read chinese propagada, I would go to the source:

    http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/

    You know, I wish I 1) spoke some variant of Chinese and 2) knew more about Chinese media outlets. I wrote a journal post about this situation back when it was developing and tried to find a diverse viewpoint in Chinese news related to Google's ultimatum. It turned out to be more humorous and an exercise in futility than anything else. Does anyone who speaks the language know of a 'subversive' news source out of China? Or anything at all offering balanced and multiple views in the reporting? All I see is multiple sources looking like they are offering you unbiased news when, in fact, they are regurgitating something to you that is within a government approved standard deviation of the government approved message.

    Really, really sad. Also a stark reminder of how thankful I should be of the diversity of our press in the United States no matter how sorry it may look at times ...

    --
    My work here is dung.
  10. One company's ambition by thej1nx · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If one company's ambition change China's internet rules will only prove to be ridiculous, why is a China government run news agency so frantically issuing statements on the issue?

    It is just one company, right? In theory they shouldn't even be taking notice...

    If they had actually expected to come out fully unscathed from this, they would have not even blinked.

    China's censorship system had worked so far only because the Chinese always had options/alternatives when blocked from sites containing "dangerous ideas". The Chinese public simply accepted the government explanation. But Google, as the world's leading search engine, is something that is pretty much an inherent part of internet. Blocking a valuable internet resource requires much more rationalization, which is exactly what has the Chinese government sweating. It will be much harder to sell to the internet-using Chinese public. As such, this actually can lead to a relaxing of censorship in China. If not, it will lead to a realization on the part of Chinese public as to how they are actually visibly suffering by tolerating a non-democratic fascist state. Both are the first baby steps on the road to self-determination and freedom for the people in China.

    Sadly, the said Chinese government is banking on having an alternative in competing search engines such as that of Microsoft. If Microsoft fails to follow Google's example, it will now actually be actively working to keep the seeds of democracy out of China.

    Not that Microsoft, would be interested in anything apart from its profit line, considering it doesn't really believes in any kind of business ethics.

  11. hate them, but there's some truth by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, we all love to hate the chinese. But there's some truth in there. The US is aggressively exporting its values and believes to the entire world, and it isn't asking if anyone wants it. Hollywood is the biggest propaganda machine ever, far more subtle and effective than any Nazi or Soviet Russian government efforts. And yes, Google is part of a culture as much as it is a company, and is bringing that culture to the world.

    Most of the world is eating it up. A lot of people welcome it. Few of them made a conscious decision among alternatives on the matter of culture and spirit.

    I'm not debating if the US culture is "good" or "bad" here, just stating the fact that the amount of culture that is in the american way of doing business is seldom reflected.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:hate them, but there's some truth by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when did the right to self-determination, freedom of expression and thought, freedom to not be oppressed by a fascist state, become wrong?

      Huh? Those aren't exclusively US values, buddy. Though it's amusingly very American to claim ownership of those ideas...

      No, "American culture" is generally considered fun stuff like: Consumerism. Corporatism. Obsession with money and violence. Fear of sex and drugs.

      You know, the real America, not the fictious one that conservatives and libertarians wished existed, but actually doesn't.

  12. I feel lucky to be born in the USA by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The US government has done many awful and unjust things but it is a beacon of human rights when compared to the Peoples Republic of China.

    What's happens to US citizens when they criticize the US government? What happens to Chinese citizens when they criticize the current government of China?

    An honest answer to this test should quiet the post we will see here today. Somebody is going to apologize for the atrocities of the Chinese government by saying that the US government is no better. I can criticize both the US government and the Chinese government. I don't fear any reprisal from the US government for that criticism. Chinese citizens can have their lives taken away or be imprisoned for little more than a charge of 'creating instability'.

    1. Re:I feel lucky to be born in the USA by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I don't fear any reprisal from the US government for that criticism."

      That is a bit of a stretch, considering that critics of US foreign policy have found themselves unable to board airplanes. Sure, it is not as bad as what happens in China, but let's not act like the US is all roses and that criticism of the government goes unpunished. Only a few years ago, my friends were imprisoned for peacefully protesting the RNC in New York. Like I said, not as bad as China, but certainly nothing close to ideal...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:I feel lucky to be born in the USA by wilder_card · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unable to board airplanes == imprisoned and executed? Really?

    3. Re:I feel lucky to be born in the USA by andy1307 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like I said, not as bad as China, but certainly nothing close to ideal...

      That's a straw man. Where did OP claim the US was a utopia?

  13. Re:Well, yeah. by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course Google is trying to impose "American Values" on China. As it stands, they can't gain enough power to control things there. If China becomes more like America, then Google (and other companies) will have a bigger say in the government, and will be able to make more money.

    Yes, obviously. It can't possibly have anything to do with Google's value coming from allowing people access to information and Chinese government's power coming from denying people access to information. Clearly, this is not about Chinese government wanting to keep its Ministry of Truth running and Google being a threat to that, but instead it's about Google trying to control Chinese government.

    I guess every puppetmaster's worst nightmare is for the strings to get cut...

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  14. Re:Whoda thunkit? by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not sure Google is actively working to further the interests of the US. Instead, Chinese leadership is incapable of appreciating the differences between US policy, US culture, and plain ole' innate freedoms. Chinese leadership sees everything through a Han cultural perspective, with everyone not Han is either a strong barbarian intent upon conquering China or a weak barbarian who should be conquered by China.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  15. Re:Can't be by WindowlessView · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bah. As if in the US's case the "country" has anything to say about it. China has some notion of "country" and keeps its companies aware of it. The US is owned lock, stock and barrel by corporations who throw around terms like country and patriotism when it is convenient for them - usually when they need some cannon fodder and tax payer funding to defend or acquire what is in their corporate interest.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
  16. Re:Can't be by msoftsucks · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's not what is happening here. What's really happening is that the last 12 years of giving the rich tax breaks and giving them free money has caused them to be even more greedy. Instead of reinvesting that money in America, they fired all their American workers and closed down the American factories and opened new ones in China. They started off saying that only the low-skilled work will be moved, to where they are now moving engineering and higher level skills. And they are trying to hide that they are doing this. Just look at IBM recently saying that they will stop reporting employee levels by country. The rich don't care if they destablize America and get a little dirty working with a dictatorship because the were already dirty making their money in the US. The movement of jobs doesn't indicate that people don't care about these jobs, it shows that the rich have no allegance to any country and are killing America for greed. Plain and simple.

    --
    Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
    Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
  17. Imposing American values on China? by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You mean like free trade?

    The Chinese government *wants* American values, but cafeteria style. They want free exchange of information so long as it is information leaving America and entering China. They don't want information leaving China or worse yet circulating within China. The Chinese government wants America to be open and pursue classical liberal trade policy while it remains closed and pursues mercantilist policies. It wants America to be true to its respect of sovereign nations, but to forget about every individual's sovereignty over his own opinions. It demands the American not interfere in free markets while the Peoples Liberation Army operates businesses and party official parlay their connections into business wealth.

    China has rejected the extreme form of socialism it was founded on, but it has not adopted the enlightened capitalism of Europe and America. It has recreatd the caricature of American capitalism portrayed in its own propaganda: a system in which corrupt wealthy men pull the strings of corrupt government.

    It's no wonder they don't want American values: those values empower the working class.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  18. Re:Can't be by WindowlessView · · Score: 5, Insightful
    > you might want to reread your statement with "me" instead of "them".

    Most people do. Here is what they see about financial holdings in the US:

    Top 1% owns 43%

    Next 19% owns 50%

    Bottom 80% owns 7%

    Most people see no "me" in those statements.

    > However if a company doesn't do this things, then the stockholders sue saying that the CEO's were not doing their best to maximize profits.

    A situation which could be remedied by changes to some laws. More importantly would be getting Wall Street off companies backs so they can plan more than 3 months out. The latter has less to do maximizing corporate profits than the Street's own interests, profits, and bonuses.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannolis.