Slashdot Mirror


GoDaddy Follows Google's Lead; No More Registrations In China

phantomfive writes "GoDaddy has announced it will no longer register domain names in China, in response to new requirements that each registrant be photographed, and their business ID number be submitted. GoDaddy's representative said, 'The intent of the procedures appeared, to us, to be based on a desire by the Chinese authorities to exercise increased control over the subject matter of domain name registrations by Chinese nationals.'"

49 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fuck China and its shit.

    1. Re:Good. by religious+freak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plus, it'll be a total change in process and increase costs below the point of profitability for Godaddy

      fuck, shit, piss

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    2. Re:Good. by grumpyman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good. Don't buy anything made in China.

    3. Re:Good. by skine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is that possible?

    4. Re:Good. by grumpyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is exactly my point - I don't think it's possible (my comment never meant to be funny, but I find the modders amusing). Like it or not, as western society, we are part of the 'problem' (or you can call it 'ecosystem').

  2. Wow by Anonymusing · · Score: 5, Funny

    GoDaddy did something I like.

    Though, it probably has less to do with "Yay Freedom!" than "We can't sell that even with big-breasted women."

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    1. Re:Wow by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably has most of all to do with GoDaddy not wanting to figure out the logistics of integrating the new photography/ID requirements into their purchase system.

    2. Re:Wow by Buelldozer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Danica Patrick has a bra size of roughly 32B. That's hardly "big breasted" ;-)

    3. Re:Wow by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, it's hard to believe I used to recommend them as a hosting service--back before their advertising campaigns started looking like Hooter's commercials. Now they could have the best value on the market and I'd still be ashamed to recommend them to any real client (and by "real" I mean "Anyone who isn't an old frat brother").

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Wow by Eighty7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wish they'd go ahead and pull out of America too.

    5. Re:Wow by Jay+Clay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My brother works at GoDaddy... Amusingly, Anonymusing may be pretty close to the truth, from what I hear about the owner.

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymusing · · Score: 2, Informative

      In their defense... when their systems work, they work just fine. It's only when something goes wrong... it goes REALLY wrong, and Tech Support becomes a synonym for Kill Me Now.

      I've had worse experiences with BlueHost and 1&1 than I've had with GoDaddy, although that might not be saying much.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    7. Re:Wow by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having dealt with GoDaddy in the past (it took less than a month from setting up the hosting account to me threatening to sue them for breach), I'm pretty certain that the reason has nothing to do with doing right by their customers, so that pretty much leaves the alternatives; when you eliminate the unimaginable, whatever remains must be the case.... :-D

      My guess would be that it would take too much effort to add this to their purchasing system. They seem utterly incapable of making even simple changes to that system, which tells me that it's probably an unholy mess....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:Wow by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Working well is not a defense for being evil.

      "The Death Star contractors are delivering on time and under budget! Look at the quality of this work!"

    9. Re:Wow by Reverend528 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe they will. I was watching fox news today and apparently we are now socialists.

  3. Hey, Me Too! by 0racle · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would also like to announce that I will no longer be accepting contract work originating in China.

    Everything is easier when someone else takes the first steps.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Hey, Me Too! by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is easy for many companies that deal with web-based work to do this. China is a hotbed of Internet fraud. Although GoDaddy probably makes quite a bit off of domain registrations for .com/.net/etc from China, adding in the photography requirement isn't what will kill their interest. It is the eventual benefit of this requirement that would reduce much of the fraud coming from China (one hopes), and with the reduction of fraud, there are very few legitimate .com/.net/etc registrations from China compared to the US and the rest of the world.

    2. Re:Hey, Me Too! by Buelldozer · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's possible that the volume of registrations would fall low enough that they wouldn't make any money by continuing to do business there.

    3. Re:Hey, Me Too! by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I once worked with a client with subcontractors in China, who would at various times send him mockups and technical drawings for various products. On one particular project, time was getting tight and the subcontractor became strangely non-communicative at a crucial juncture. My client's blood pressure started rising as he kept trying (within the confines of a 10-12 hour timezone difference and a fairly significant language barrier on the telephone) to figure things out and get all the information we needed.

      The subcon kept insisting "I sent the files. I sent the files" but he never received them. As a workaround I set up an FTP space where files could be exchanged and we got through our deadlines that way. After the fact, an idea occurred to me and I told my client "hey, why don't you just phone up your ISP and ask them why you're not getting email from China?"

      Sure enough, it turned out his ISP had one day decided to just unilaterally stop accepting email from Chinese IP addresses. They did this as a spam and malware control measure, but didn't see fit to inform their customers of the change since they assumed it wouldn't impact anyone in any real way.

      Fun times.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    4. Re:Hey, Me Too! by Thinboy00 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd think they'd start with Nigeria.

      --
      $ make available
  4. pandemic? by bl8n8r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not a big deal - godaddy isn't the only domain registry out there. I wonder what other companies are going to follow suit though. Endgame I see is china eventually unplugging from the rest of the world and inventing it's own set of 'tubes.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:pandemic? by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod this interesting? How the hell is China going to operate in a global economy where more and more business is done over the Internet? The whole point of the filtering is the realization that China cannot compete without allowing access to the Internet, but trying to mitigate the potential delirious effects (to the government and the party) of a fully open Internet. If all it took was just chopping down the copper and fiber at the borders and shutting off access to foreign satellites, without any harmful effects to the Chinese economy, they would have done this fifteen years ago. They don't because they can't, so they have to use the state muscle to try to keep people from seeing dangerous information.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:pandemic? by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I think 'deleterious' is the word you were looking for.

      Why? "delirious " is a perfectly cromulent word.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:pandemic? by idontgno · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Closed trade enclaves to protect the people from the cultural pollution of the Southern Barbarians is an ancient and demonstratively successful strategy in that part of the world.

      Anyone with a legitimate business, diplomatic, or other official government-sanctioned need for external access will get it... massively filtered and heavily monitored, and for only a ridiculously small proportion of the population. That way, effective monitoring is feasible. Access will be strictly white-list.

      Everyone else gets the Chinese equivalent of AOL, pre-1993. (That's right, not even Usenet.)

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:pandemic? by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everyone else gets the Chinese equivalent of AOL, pre-1993

      They get floppies in the mail every month?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:pandemic? by nahdude812 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For Apple to abandon a supplier practically costs them nothing. There are a hundred more companies eager to step up to the plate and at worst Apple sees a temporary dimple in their supply.

      For Google to take a stance that they know shuts out a massive demographic is a much more significant ethical stand.

      The two are not even close in terms of sacrifice involved.

  5. No it's not. by IANAAC · · Score: 5, Insightful
    No, it's not obligatory.

    It's old and entirely unoriginal.

    1. Re:No it's not. by spazdor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's all pile onto this pointless thread and chime in about how pointless it is, so that it will take longer to scroll past.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    2. Re:No it's not. by spazdor · · Score: 4, Funny

      In metasyntactic Mad-Lib substitution joke, Communist rhetorical cliches build unexpected wooden puns out of YEW!

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
  6. What is their bottom line in China? by zero_out · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to wonder just how much GoDaddy.com was making from its presence in China. What was its market share? What was its gross revenue?

    Based on the opinions of many /. comments, I would have suspected that the two would make happy bedfellows. Doesn't GoDaddy.com practice extreme control over their clients, rooting boxes, and taking over lapsed domain names to then extort their customers, or am I mistaking it for another registrar / host?

    1. Re:What is their bottom line in China? by d34dluk3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Doesn't GoDaddy.com practice extreme control over their clients?

      Extreme control over their clients' boobs is more like it.

  7. Not political, just too much work by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    China is imposing requirements that domain registrants must provide a photo and a business ID. That's too much hassle for GoDaddy, home of extreme low-end domain registrations. This has little to do with politics and much to do with GoDaddy's business model.

    1. Re:Not political, just too much work by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree entirely. GoDaddy wouldn't do something hard because it is right, but (like most businesses) would do something easy because it saves money.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  8. I wonder by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Funny

    If fu.cn is taken?

  9. Geeze... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

    What a bunch of boobs.

  10. .CN domain extensions, not chinese registrations! by MrCawfee · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article summary is fairly misleading, they are no longer registering the .CN extension

    Here is some background:

      In December, giving 2 days notice to the international registrars, the .CN registry changed their policy to require paper documentation to register a .CN domain name. In January, because the registry didn't plan this very well, and because they gave absolutely no notice, they decided to turn off registrations all together until they could figure out how to actually implement their new policy. The registry implemented their policy without figuring out actually how to implement their policy..

    After a month of no registrations, they opened it up, changing their policy once again to only allow .CN registrations for companies not individuals, and only companies that had an office in china. From what i understand, they are trying to remove the stigma of .CN being the #1 fraud extension (before .cm came out that is)

    So to be clear, godaddy is no longer doing .CN registrations because .CN is no longer completely automated, which makes it unprofitable with their business model which is primarily based on volume.

  11. Re:inalienable rights by RabidRabb1t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Companies like Google and GoDaddy leaving China is not the result of them foisting their (or as you put it, American) views upon the Chinese; they are acting in what they believe to be their best interests. Filtering internet content or maintaining a backlog of photos and business IDs takes time and costs money. These companies did not like the control China was trying to exercise over them. The Chinese told them to get lost, and they did.

  12. Re:inalienable rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would be one thing if the US government decided to force democracy down China's throat.

    As things stand, that's not even in the ballpark of what's going on

    This, my friend, is capitalism. Google's power comes from freedom of information, which is severely limited in China. Similarly, GoDaddy has decided that continuing to operate in China would be just too much hassle.

    In my opinion, this is also the right thing to do. China is a big power -- possibly the next superpower. And if they do become at least as powerful as the US, it seems reasonable to hope that they will be dedicated to freedom instead of oppression.

    But in the end, this is the market at work.

  13. Re:inalienable rights by neonKow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last I checked, neither Google nor GoDaddy has a military, so I don't see how they're forcing anything. Both GoDaddy and Google are probably less concerned about the health of the US than about the health of the Internet, so I don't even think "American world view" and "supporting dictators vs democracies" has much to do with the issue.

  14. Re:inalienable rights by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I used to be really annoyed that the US has worked with so many kings and dictators, but then I realized the truth: 60 years ago, there was no one else really to do business with. More of the world was in some form of dictatorship than it was in democracy. When you look at it like that, the fact that we do business with Egypt really becomes more of a legacy operation than evilness, especially for the old guys in the state department who have been around a while.

    am awfully tired of our half assed attempts to export our way of life at all levels only when we see fit. we have supported as many dictators as democracies mostly because dictators are easier to please and get to follow our wishes.

    So you see a problem, and that is we aren't consistent in trying to make the world better, and your solution is to stop trying? If we change our policy, why don't we change it instead to be, encourage freedom where we can, deprecate evil wherever it is. We can't change the world alone, but almost everyone should agree that freedom of speech, women's rights, and freedom of self-determination are a good thing.

    --
    Qxe4
  15. Interesting by WeeBit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Smith has sponsored a bill that would make it a crime for U.S. companies to share personal user information with "Internet-restricting" countries. "

    Actually if you think about it, that Bill would help companies like Google and GoDaddy. Sorry China I can't help you in your quest to find out which of your citizens posted that content! Problem solved thanks to the new Bill.

  16. Re:inalienable rights by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

    flame me but can't we just let countries choose their own path? there is no reason we need to force the American world view down everyone's throat.

    Wait, I am confused.

    Is your contention that:
    1) Countries should be free to choose their own path, or is it
    2) Countries should not be free to choose the path of shoving their worldview down everyone's throat

    Because you can't have both.

    Furthermore, even if we accept that what China is doing is legitimate in terms of "choosing their own path" (rather than a case of "shoving their worldview down everyone's throat"), why does that mean it has to be free of consequences? China chooses its path. Google, GoDaddy, and who knows who else looks at that path and says, "you know what, we're not willing to do business on those terms" and stops doing business in China. Do you think that not only should countries be able to choose their own path, but that private entities should be actively compelled to continue to do business in countries that they no longer wish to do business in?

  17. Re:inalienable rights by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    can't we just let countries choose their own path?

    Can't China just let its citizens choose their own path?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  18. They still have a stranglehold... by improfane · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This really does not hurt China much.

    The western society is a 'servce culture', we exchange value by doing things for one another. The east culture is a manufacture culture. In the UK, our youth look up to playing instruments, video games, being footballers or engineers - doing service related things. In China, education is very important and cut throat. It's more about being a mathmatician, engineer or scientist. In my book about China and Microsoft (Gwanshee), the Chinese can get into university degrees as young as 13!

    They are reducing our production capability - they manufacture a large number of things for us so we can do business cheaper. This is a massive stranglehold they have: we benefit because our businesses can do things for less. It's no longer profitable for us to run factories and production workshops in our own territories. This means we become dependent on them, like sucking from a teat.

    What do they get from it?

    Skills, knowledge, experience to bolster their own country. We get nothing. If we send an Apple engineer to overseer production of an iPod*, who is actually learning how the technology works? Do you think that it's really private from the native factory owners? We're essentially giving them technology and abilities. We have seen them building factories, power stations and transport links that put ours to shame, they are really building themselves an impressive infrastructure. They fund international scholarships to put the skills they learn to good news.

    We're digging ourself into a roadblock. What if China cuts us off from manufacturing? It's not as though ALL THE businesses have absolute control, they could not avoid retribution from the government!

    We would be screwed. The UK practically builds nothing by itself anymore, we just let China do it. If they stop, we're unemployed and opened for expansion. I think they are grinding us down slowly and surely.

    What do you think of China? What can we do about it?

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:They still have a stranglehold... by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if China cuts us off from manufacturing?

      Then we will move our manufacturing to other poor countries: Cambodia, Thailand, India, Latvia will all be happy to pick up the slack if China lets off. They all want to learn the skills and technology, too.

      China can't conquer by cutting off production of cheap manufactured goods. If they stop producing stuff, yeah, there might be a shortage and deep recession for a number of years (mainly depending on how quickly they stop; remember that if they stop immediately it will really hurt them too, and if it is a long slow stop, it will be easy for us to adapt to), but it won't take long to get production back up in other places.

      Also, I can't speak for the UK, but in the US there is still a manufacturing industry of $2.7 trillion. So it isn't a hopeless case.

      --
      Qxe4
  19. Re:inalienable rights by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, we've done it many times in South America. Pinochet comes to mind immediately.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  20. Re:inalienable rights by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think you got modded troll because you used what is basically an argument from a philosophy 101 class to make a point. Everyone already knows that some things (like slavery) are bad, even if they can't describe the philosophical basis for that judgement, so bringing it up is nothing but a distraction from the conversation.

    However, if you like to discuss philosophy, I'll give my view on it:
    There is no natural reason that slavery is bad. It is entirely our opinion, our own judgement. Even if you want to base your moral system on an idea like, "we should try to make sure our system of government causes harm to as few people as possible" or "society should be fair" or "do unto others as you would have them do unto you," it still is nothing more than an opinion that "society should be fair." At the bottom of any moral system is an opinion (it should be noted that evolution will favor those systems that tend to preserve society, whereas those that are self destructive tend to disappear).

    This is the meaning of freedom. We are free to see the world however we want, to be (in our hearts and minds) whoever we want. If enough people decide slavery is ok, it will happen. The earth has seen such things and worse before.

    Personally what I have chosen is that slavery is bad, and it is an opinion I feel strongly enough that I would be willing to fight to make sure the US remains slavery free, if I had to. My beliefs are that it is good to be loving and kind, and help people out when you can. And I try to do that, no matter what other people think.

    --
    Qxe4
  21. perfect the enemy of the good by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maximize the localness of your purchases.

    1. Re:perfect the enemy of the good by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good luck with that.

      As I sit here and consider all that is before me from China, I realize I would have to get rid of:

      My LCD picture frame
      My lamps
      My vacuum cleaner
      My stereo
      My microwave
      My oven
      My dishwasher
      My speakers
      My toaster
      My guitar hero controller
      My Wii
      My TV
      My DVD player
      My coffee maker

      I'll just go ahead and stop there. That is just the stuff I can see without getting up off my couch. If I went through the bedrooms and threw away everything made in China, my house would be half empty.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.