Slashdot Mirror


Pumping Sunlight Into Homes

ByronScott sends a snippet from Inhabitat that begins "What if you could light your entire building using no electricity or artificial lights – but just the natural light from our favorite star, the Sun? Enter the Sundolier, a powerful sunlight transport system that's like putting a solar robot on your roof to pump sunlight indoors. The manufacturer claims a single Sundolier unit can provide enough light to illuminate a 1,000-2,500 sq. ft. area [93-232 sq. m] without any other sources." The company's website is a bit thin on details, such as what happens on cloudy days, or how many days of sunlight per year on average are needed for the device to perform acceptably.

45 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. There are no details by BobPaul · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's thin on the details because there are no details. This is just a flexible aluminum tube and a diffuser. The only thing different about this than the kits you can get at Menards is the big collector array which tracks the sun.

    There's no solar panels in this system. On cloudy days, you use electric lighting.

    Our Sundolier delivers sunlight so effectively that electric lighting can be turned off when the sun is out offering excellent opportunities to save electricity while reducing heat generation through cool indirect daylighting.

    There's no mention anywhere, not in the inhabitat.com article, nor the companies website, that this does anything on cloudy days.

    1. Re:There are no details by BobPaul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or a less fancy version. The article says

      The concentrated light is then reflected down a two foot tube and distributed using a “sun chandelier”.

      Fiberoptics would allow you to snake light to various rooms, into basements, etc. That seems more useful.

    2. Re:There are no details by oscartheduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, exactly. The use cases on the website are even all things like offices, schools, the kinds of places that aren't inhabited at night.

      --
      How to use coral cache: http://slashdot.org.nyud.net:8090/~oscartheduck
    3. Re:There are no details by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Considering it's for blunt transfer of light I think the fiber version might be cheaper too since you could basically make it out of the cheapest still-transmitting rejected cables.

      I'm not sure how much the cheapest functional cable for this is though, or how flexible, although the real trick would be getting the light into the fiber-optics to begin with. Some kind of half-pipe and tube-collector design both capable of just being hosed down by a home user is obviously the best solution but probably also expensive or impossible.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    4. Re:There are no details by magamiako1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure if the electric wiring in your house is burning to the point of causing you problems with toxic fumes, you've got quite a bit more to worry about.

    5. Re:There are no details by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sweet a hypochondriac geek.

      If you are worrying about the tiny bit of VOC's from your houses wiring, then I better not tell you about what your carpet and the wood in your house is outgassing. or the paint on the walls (yes even the "enviro-junk" they sell to try and placate people like you).

      The wiring puts out far FAR less than many other sources in a home even a LEEDS certified green home. Natural woods gas out nasties if you want to go looking for nasties.

      Oh and dont get me started about the impurity of the gypsum in your wall board.....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:There are no details by cptdondo · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK, they're officially call "Deck Prisms".

      http://glassian.org/Prism/Deck/index.html

    7. Re:There are no details by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently had a "Sun Tube" (sold at Home Depot and Lowes) installed in my house as an experiment.

      They cost about $153. It eliminates the need for a couple 60 watt bulbs and provides the lighting of about 300 watts.
      There appears to be no heat gain but I'm sure there is some.

      I'm happy with the results-- some people are not. The light is not yellowy like the light we are used to - it's blue white. You look outside the window and it's the same color but somehow it seems different when there isn't a window to compare.

      At current prices, I am not sure these would pay off.

      It has a "dimmer" door which is run by a solar powered battery as an option for more money.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:There are no details by countertrolling · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, you might have trouble during an eclipse...

      No problem. We'll just put up a National Eclipse Warning System to tell people to move to higher ground. Something with lasers, of course.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    9. Re:There are no details by MiniMike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Poor guy can't even go live in a cave, due to the threat of Radon. Seriously, if someone is that worried about the toxins in their house they should open their window and exchange them for the toxins outside their house.

  2. what a great idea! by cnkurzke · · Score: 4, Funny

    this works amazing, we should find a new name for this revolutionary device, how about we call it a WINDOW????

    only downside, it doesnt work when it's needed most, namely AT NIGHT, when it's dark.

    Maybe WINDOWS version 2.1 will fix that??

    1. Re:what a great idea! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      only downside, it doesnt work when it's needed most, namely AT NIGHT, when it's dark.

      That's not a bug.....it's a feature.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:what a great idea! by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This has lots of interesting uses, but homes are not generally the primary market. Light pipes are most useful for businesses. You want to build a big office building to minimize cost, which means that not everybody can have a window office. So what do you do? You put in light pipes so that you can significantly reduce your energy costs and significantly improve worker health and morale.

      Same principal applies to apartment buildings, hotels, etc. Imagine a sun deck with outdoor-style gardens at ground level in a 20-story hotel. Imagine cutting the lighting bill for an entire office building (including interior rooms) to zero almost every day. And so on.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:what a great idea! by anarche · · Score: 2, Funny

      Didnt they use these back in ancient times with someone adjusting the mirrors by hand

      Yes, but I've been banned from training monkeys to move the mirrors and the slaves keep going blind.

      Never trust a blind slave to shave you...

      --
      Wait! Whats a sig?
    4. Re:what a great idea! by feepness · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but I've been banned from training monkeys to move the mirrors and the slaves keep going blind. Never trust a blind slave to shave you...

      The sighted monkeys aren't such a great idea either.

    5. Re:what a great idea! by hey0you0guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was the best of times, it was the BLURST of times!?

  3. 50W lightbulb using a common 2L Bottle by Hadlock · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been done in the 3rd world for ages. You drill a hole in your roof, mount a 2L soda bottle filled with water (and two cap-fulls of bleach to keep it clean and clear), and stick an old black plastic film canister overtop of the white lid to keep the plastic from degrading. The video of these in use is amazing. Sadly however it only works when the sun is up - which is most of the workday (12 hrs typically) in the tropics.
     
    Watch it in action. Wow. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zMAWztZ6TI

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:50W lightbulb using a common 2L Bottle by value_added · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe you're the person to ask ...

      Some years back I stopped for a meal at a restaurant in the historical district of a small town here in California. The restaurant was a converted barn of some sort and had two large double doors for an entrance. During business hours, those doors were left open, as were another set of interior doors that led to an open air patio outside. Hanging on the wall by each sets of doors was a large 1-quart ziplock bag. The bag was filled with water.

      Noticing the bags, I asked the owner about them. She told me they were there to keep the flies from coming into the restaurant. I asked how a water-filled bag worked to keep flies away, and she said, "No idea, but do you see any flies in here?" Indeed, there were no flies to be seen (though there were some outside). She went on to tell me that that they had a regular fly problem years back, and one day a local immigrant gardner suggested the bags. The rest, as they say, is history.

      I'd guess an entomologist might be the one to ask, but have you heard of this technique being used?

    2. Re:50W lightbulb using a common 2L Bottle by masterQba · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1956/whats-the-purpose-of-bags-of-water-hanging-in-restaurants/ The water bag acts as a lens that enhances movement. The flies react to the movement - they stay away.

      --
      xb0x
    3. Re:50W lightbulb using a common 2L Bottle by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can do the same with acrylic rods. We did that for a insulated ceiling building in northern Michigan. we had the top of the rod cut at an angle and had that angle set to the south east as lighting was more important to be bright in the morning. 3 foot long 4" diameter clear rod cost less than $40.00 each and the cutting and polishing was done on site with a saw and acetone. inside was crudely faceted to spread the light around, shaft was painted with white wall paint.. plus you dont get a heat loss out of them unlike the reflective tubes with single layer plastic caps at each end that cost far more and are far harder to install.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  4. Bradbury story by wisebabo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a story by Bradbury (sorry slow internet here don't want to look it up) where they had "picture" windows made of glass(?) with an extremely(!) high index of refraction. These windows had been left out in some scenic location (African savannah) and because the velocity of light was so slow through the glass, it would take years for the light to get through! Thus a "perfect" 3D display of whatever the window had been exposed to.

    Sounds (extremely) farfetched but in "light" (ha ha) of the discovery of a method to slow down or even stop light (admittedly in a Bose-Einstein condescent in a near perfect vacuum just above absolute zero), it is not entirely fantasy. Not entirely.

  5. Are you rich? by mikeiver1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't know about you but I am not rich. Look at the fabrication work on that thing. For starters what do you do when the rain hits the reflectors. Water spots and wind blown dirt won't effect the performance of the reflector assembly in a detrimental way. I am sure that the proud owners will not mind in the least climbing up on the roof and cleaning the reflectors and admittance windows. Should be fun on a 12/12 pitch roof install. Dual tracking motors, those are really reliable and will never fail in service. The sun tracker and electronics should last for ever as well. There is no way that this thing is anywhere near a reasonable price. All that stainless steel and special assemblies. Don't get me wrong, it is a beautifully crafted device from the pictures but the fabrication is gonna be stupid expensive. They are not going to give it away. Another rich mans folly.

    1. Re:Are you rich? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are not going to give it away. Another rich mans folly.

      You'll notice two things about their site:
      1) No prices.
      2) No "home" applications listed.

      We're not their target market anyway.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  6. From their website ... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Increase the speed of learning
    Directly impact student performance
    Improve student behavior
    Recruit the best teachers who seek the best environments
    Highest quality light = highest quality learning environment

    The Heschong Mahone Group analyzed test scores of over 21,000 students in multiple school districts. The study showed that students with the most daylighting in their classrooms progressed 20% faster on math tests and 26% faster on reading tests when compared to students in the least daylit classrooms. Heschong Mahone Group, "Daylighting in Schools" Report at www.h-w-g.com, 1999.
    In a North Carolina Performance Report, students attending daylit schools outperformed the students in non-daylit schools by 5%-14%. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report, " Daylighting in Schools: Improving Student Performance and Health at a Price Schools can Afford, " 2000.
    A National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report concluded that students benefit from daylighting, both in terms of increased performance and general health and well being. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report, "Daylighting in Schools: Improving Student Performance and Health at a Price Schools can Afford, " 2000.

    Wow ... "increase the speed of learning?". Given crackpotery on their site, the poor science, the ridiculous claims that instead of focusing on fucking light delivered, focus on subjective, unmeasurable bullshit, the complete lack of details, video, specs, etc. this product doesn't sound very serious ...

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    1. Re:From their website ... by thsths · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Wow ... "increase the speed of learning?"

      Actually that is an important point. Most artificial light is so poor that it hinders whatever you try to do. It is well known how to produce better lighting, but it is just not done. When was the last time you experienced lighting that can adjust the color temperature, for example? That is quite an essential feature to keep your day rhythm working properly, and it has been shown to improve learning results significantly.

  7. Re:Huh? by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Informative

    The collector has servo motors so it can track the sun and maximize the amount of light sent to the diffuser. Otherwise it's just the same standard aluminum tubes you'd find in any solar collector installation.

  8. Mixing CTB and CTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I noticed that they are mixing color temperatures in that video.

    Sunlight is CTB-- "color-temperature blue" -- about 6500 Kelvin.
    Tungsten lights are CTO - "color-temperature orange" -- about 3200 Kelvin

    When you have a big skylight but use tungsten lamps to light the same room, the effect is this weird blue/orange clashing effect where areas lit by the different light sources appear to have different hues. The same thing is common in grade schools or offices where blue light from the windows collides with the greenish or yellowish flickering light of fluorescents. Photographers may be especially familiar with the idea of color correction to keep the colors appearing uniform. If you mix bulbs in the tungsten spectrum with these bottles or the horizontal lighting cutout panels we call "windows", you may want to get specially color-balanced lightbulbs with the blue color so they don't clash.

  9. Re:Bradbury story -- it was Bob Shaw by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think you mean "Other Days, Other Eyes" by Bob Shaw

    Thanks for reminding me -- I read it many years ago and enjoyed it - may re-read it now :-)

    It also appeals to another Slashdot meme - an evil government using crop-dusters to sow millions of shards of 'slow glass' to act as passive surveillance.

  10. Re:Why haven't these been around? by eclectro · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've wondered for years why nobody made something like this... (Or have they, and I just didn't know about it?)

    You just haven't known about it. This is a variation upon a theme of the solar tube. You can even get them in Costco now for under $200 USD each. Though this company appears to be trying to patent this very specific design, a parabolic collector feeding sunlight indoors is not new, and much of the technology is in the public domain and used with varying degrees of success. Naturally, you'll have a higher performing system the more money you put into it, but a good ROI is difficult to achieve as with any solar product. Of course, there also is something to be said for getting off the grid (and more reliability outside of cloudy days) in itself, which may be difficult to put a price on.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  11. This one goes around corners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Something like this one: http://www.sunlight-direct.com/ uses fiber optic cables to catch the sunlight and then send it around corners/to other floors/etc. It also doesn't work at night . . . yet. But throw in a few undersea cables (interlight backbone) and we could have a daylight exchange program with nations on the other side of the planet.

  12. What distinguishes this from, say, Solatube? by GlenRaphael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I had a house built back in 1998, "Solatube" lighting was one of the build options. From this pictures, this looks like the same thing with a slightly different input lens for a system like this:

    http://www.solatube.com/residential/product-catalog/brighten-up-series/index.php

    I bought one to brighten a dark bathroom. It was nice. pretty much the same effect as a skylight, but it worked even where there was an attic in the way that would make a standard skylight unworkable.

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
    1. Re:What distinguishes this from, say, Solatube? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was my take...what is old is new again, but they've been selling these in canada for about 10 years (at least). Because the collector is raised off the roof and half spherical, it takes a substantial snowfall to cover the light collector...its maybe ineffective 1-2 months of the year.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  13. Re:Pretty cool... by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

    A tornado can wreck any roof.

  14. Sunpipes are old news by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Though this one, looks far too complicated, with it's solar tracker 'n' all. Too much to go wrong for what has generally been considered a simple solution due to it's low-tech approach at getting light into a space.

    However they all suffer from the same drawbacks. You want lighting when it's dark - not (just) during the day, so you still have to install conventional lighting too. Plus they aren't so good when it's cloudy. They also pump in all the solar heat as well as the light so you use more energy than you save cooling the place down.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Sunpipes are old news by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They also pump in all the solar heat as well as the light so you use more energy than you save cooling the place down.

      It is possible to design a collector to take advantage of chromatic aberration to limit the amount of light outside the visible range that gets in, therefore limiting the amount of heat.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  15. Re:Why haven't these been around? by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    The difference - and this is important - is that they used the word 'robot' and pretended it was something exciting, rather than an incremental improvement on the standard light-pipe design.

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  16. Hey! by icebraining · · Score: 3, Funny

    our favorite star, the Sun?

    My favorite star is Proxima Centauri, you insensitive clod.

  17. Been around since the 80s by Dyne09 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This idea is not new at all... I used to work for a company that holds the original patents on this type of technology (http://www.solatube.com/), and has making these types of things since the 80s. Their product was far less obtrusive, and from the inside looked a recessed can-light, and not the transporter deck from the star ship Enterprise. Their overall luminosity was far greater too, and multiple warehouses and factory floors already use this tech. The technology around carrying light through a tubular structure has become pretty efficient, however the size of the roof perforation and the overall ability of the light to turn sharp corners are the big problem. It's basically impossible to feed these things through walls and reach a second floor. Instead, you have go straight down. There is however another company that already came up with the idea of using a solar dish to track light, only, they did it much much much more intelligently. http://www.sunlight-direct.com/ With fiber optics, they can scale down the size of the perforations, go much further distances, and make the lights much less obtrusive. They can even make 90 degree turns (or 180 degree, or 490 degrees if you really wanted too....) with virtually no loss of light. Just stating the obvious...

  18. nukdolier by MrKaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a problem much more easily solved by placing miniature nuclear power plants on peoples homes to generate electricity for internal lighting. Obviously no one has considered the danger from indoor sunburn from these lamps and a rooftop nuke would be a much more reliable solution that a glorified and much more complicated, sun mirror.

    What happens when it's cloudy? Such a stupid idea to use the sun for light during the day as it is *obviously* not as reliable as a rooftop nuke.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  19. Re:Pretty cool... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Incorrect. Most geodesic domes survive direct interaction with tornadoes. There is a cement dome home in the tornado belt that survived a F-5 tornado. with having all the exterior paint stripped off, but the building was left intact and undamaged.

    Just becaouse most people are stupid and build their homes like flimsy boxes does not mean ALL are.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  20. Umm...scooped by Weekly Reader... by HikingStick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember reading about this technology in the late 1970s or early 1980s in Weekly Reader, a print publication for the lowest elementary school grades in the U.S., designed to get kids interested in reading about a broad range of topics. One issue featured a Japanese office building that had a solar collector (a parabolic dish) on the roof, and then fiber optic cables that were run to various offices. Because the fiber carried so much of the sun's intensity, they had to terminate the fiber runs behind a diffuser (similar to what photographers used). I've been itching to see the technology reach the consumer market for years and years--I'd love to have natural light cycles visible in our basement rooms, and at the office I'd love to minimize our use of light fixtures when we could use natural light.

    If you have kids in school who still get Weekly Reader, take some time to read it with them. I've been amazed how, time and again, their predictions and insights into new technologies have been right on the mark.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  21. but... by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Funny

    does it run Linux?

    Sorry, someone had to ask.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:but... by jarbrewer · · Score: 2, Funny

      does it run Linux?

      More importantly, could you set up a sufficiently large Beowulf cluster of these things to light, say, 1/2 the earth at any given time?

  22. Cost by Anomalyst · · Score: 2, Informative

    Per their company president: $15K + install

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  23. Re:Coasters/update by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Update for anyone interested. Put one out this morning over the doorway leading to the front porch, just hung it from a string, and it is spinning and swaying around in the breeze. Seems to scare the flies away. We were getting them hanging out and around the screen door, where they would book in whenever it got opened. Now not seeing any. It isn't effecting the big bumblebees at all.