On the grading machine, keep the history window open. It's stored as part of the file. File history should give a very good idea if the student is resorting to shenanigans. Yes, a student could delete the file's history, but the teacher could require 'showing your work' through the history.
That may be but he has consistently applied the laws as written. (Unlike that other justice: Sotomayor who ignores that law & makes random decisions based on her beliefs.) If you don't like the laws don't blame the judges who merely enforce them. Blame the Congress for producing bad law.
The judiciary doesn't enforce the law. The executive enforces the law. The judiciary interprets the law. In other words, the judiciary takes the law as written as well as an actual set of facts; then, based on belief, determines how the law applies to the set of facts. Thus, interprets.
As justices, this is true of both Sotomayor and Scalia.
If you want to see both, the Udvar-Hazy Center currently has both. With the added bonus of an SR-71 and the Enola Gay. You don't even have to leave the airport, assuming you fly into Dulles that is.
But it may be able to answer a lot of questions asked by, say, a phone support caller.
Or better yet, questions posed from a phone marketer. I would certainly consider purchasing a product that was able to engage a telemarketer for a non-trivial length of time without committing me to buy something from that telemarketer.
Show up to the polling place and take a ballot. Submit the blank. A vote for 'nobody' is still a vote, in the sense that you're marked as having voted in the election.
The obligation that ties to the rights you (may or may not) enjoy is to show up on the first Tuesday in November and cast a ballot.
What I wouldn't have given to only have to walk up hills. Everything was mountains in my day. And the 'game' was called Getting Poked In the Eye With a Stick. And we were grateful.
Considering that the fastest space vehicles ever created took 3 months to travel a mere 8 light *minutes* (somewhere around one-16000th the speed of light), the assumption that we will ever reach even a significant fraction of the speed of light with a vehicle created anytime in the conceivable future is a bit of an overstretch to say the *least*.
No problem... A quick application of Moore's Law and we should be ready for launch in about 30 years.
A quick google search of Pixar's production schedule might have told the poster, or even the editor, that 2 of Pixar's next 3 movies are in fact new franchises.
In regards to my private Wifi service, the only authority I have to obey is my home state legislature, since I operate completely and wholly within the state.
Please see Wickard v. Filburn. The Supreme Court doesn't necessarily agree with you in RE: Reach of Federal Jurisdiction.
Apologies that I've pulled this completely off-topic. -- Ultimately, my preference, if the chemicals are properly documented on the food, is that the choice remain with me... in the sense that I want to decide if trans-fats are too much of a hassle. What I don't want is someone who thinks he has my interest at heart going to the State of New York and asking that I not be given the choice.
I just don't see the need to escalate this from a fairly benign individual decision about the level of hassle associated with the new rev of Google Earth into some sort of (to quote from the GP of your original post) war.
Umm, If you don't like DRM, then don't buy DRM encumbered music!
If you do want to listen to your music on all the devices you own, you still have options. For instance, you can simply buy the CD and do the work required to translate that music into the format desired for playback on whatever device you like, be it MP3 player, analog turntable, or full in-house symphony orchestra. If the effort is too great for any given device, perhaps what you should question is the wisdom of purchasing, say, an in-house symphony orchestra.
If you want to see the ocean floor, you have at least two choices: use Google Earth, or swim to the bottom of the ocean. The only real question is, is any available choice better than 'not' seeing the bottom of the ocean?
. . . for any citizen to conspire, support, or engage in activities whose sole purpose is the violent overthrow of the Constitution?
Since December 15, 1791.
The first amendment allows freedom of expression, even if the idea being expressed is to abolish the existing government.
You've conflated the Constitution with the Government. Those who are trying to overthrow the Constitution are significantly more dangerous than those who are simply trying to overthrow the government.
Slashdot Mirror
On the grading machine, keep the history window open. It's stored as part of the file. File history should give a very good idea if the student is resorting to shenanigans. Yes, a student could delete the file's history, but the teacher could require 'showing your work' through the history.
Never heard of collective nouns or the idea of notional agreement?
>>>Scalia is an asshole
That may be but he has consistently applied the laws as written. (Unlike that other justice: Sotomayor who ignores that law & makes random decisions based on her beliefs.) If you don't like the laws don't blame the judges who merely enforce them. Blame the Congress for producing bad law.
The judiciary doesn't enforce the law. The executive enforces the law. The judiciary interprets the law. In other words, the judiciary takes the law as written as well as an actual set of facts; then, based on belief, determines how the law applies to the set of facts. Thus, interprets. As justices, this is true of both Sotomayor and Scalia.
If you want to see both, the Udvar-Hazy Center currently has both. With the added bonus of an SR-71 and the Enola Gay. You don't even have to leave the airport, assuming you fly into Dulles that is.
But it may be able to answer a lot of questions asked by, say, a phone support caller.
Or better yet, questions posed from a phone marketer. I would certainly consider purchasing a product that was able to engage a telemarketer for a non-trivial length of time without committing me to buy something from that telemarketer.
Maybe CmdrTaco will only reveal the IPs of those criticizing slashdot
We love CmdrTaco!
Don't even need to get that far...
kdawson writes
Show up to the polling place and take a ballot. Submit the blank. A vote for 'nobody' is still a vote, in the sense that you're marked as having voted in the election. The obligation that ties to the rights you (may or may not) enjoy is to show up on the first Tuesday in November and cast a ballot.
What I wouldn't have given to only have to walk up hills. Everything was mountains in my day. And the 'game' was called Getting Poked In the Eye With a Stick. And we were grateful.
Considering that the fastest space vehicles ever created took 3 months to travel a mere 8 light *minutes* (somewhere around one-16000th the speed of light), the assumption that we will ever reach even a significant fraction of the speed of light with a vehicle created anytime in the conceivable future is a bit of an overstretch to say the *least*.
No problem... A quick application of Moore's Law and we should be ready for launch in about 30 years.
it's not dead...
It's pinin' for the fjords.
Theo Van Gogh might disagree.
does it run Linux?
More importantly, could you set up a sufficiently large Beowulf cluster of these things to light, say, 1/2 the earth at any given time?
My cellphone's gone missing...
Stupid blackholes.
Part of the magic of meatspace board games is losing the bits and pieces.
You can't do that on an iPad.
Well... you could; you just have to take a hammer to the iPad first.
stop-A
You won't find the meaning of life at level 80.
True; it's found at level 42.
What court case limits the Eighth Amendment to Criminal cases?
That would be BFI v. Kelco Disposal, at least when the government isn't a party.
Sigh.
Gold is only good if the component will be unplugged and plugged back in a lot, or will spend a lot of time sitting around.
As opposed to components that spend a lot of time jogging.
In regards to my private Wifi service, the only authority I have to obey is my home state legislature, since I operate completely and wholly within the state.
Please see Wickard v. Filburn. The Supreme Court doesn't necessarily agree with you in RE: Reach of Federal Jurisdiction.
"By 2050 nearly 80% of the worldâ(TM)s population will reside in urban centers, and 109 hectares of arable land will be needed to feed them."
Assuming this quote is accurate, then that means we'll have plenty of land to grow crops on (because not as many people live in rural areas).
Especially considering we'll be able to feed everyone in the world using just over a square kilometer of land.
Apologies that I've pulled this completely off-topic. -- Ultimately, my preference, if the chemicals are properly documented on the food, is that the choice remain with me... in the sense that I want to decide if trans-fats are too much of a hassle. What I don't want is someone who thinks he has my interest at heart going to the State of New York and asking that I not be given the choice.
I just don't see the need to escalate this from a fairly benign individual decision about the level of hassle associated with the new rev of Google Earth into some sort of (to quote from the GP of your original post) war.
Umm, If you don't like DRM, then don't buy DRM encumbered music! If you do want to listen to your music on all the devices you own, you still have options. For instance, you can simply buy the CD and do the work required to translate that music into the format desired for playback on whatever device you like, be it MP3 player, analog turntable, or full in-house symphony orchestra. If the effort is too great for any given device, perhaps what you should question is the wisdom of purchasing, say, an in-house symphony orchestra.
If you want to see the ocean floor, you have at least two choices: use Google Earth, or swim to the bottom of the ocean. The only real question is, is any available choice better than 'not' seeing the bottom of the ocean?
Since December 15, 1791.
The first amendment allows freedom of expression, even if the idea being expressed is to abolish the existing government.
You've conflated the Constitution with the Government.
Those who are trying to overthrow the Constitution are significantly more dangerous than those who are simply trying to overthrow the government.