Slashdot Mirror


Yoctonewton Detector Smashes Force Sensing Record

KentuckyFC writes "A team of physicists has measured the smallest force ever recorded, at 174 yoctonewtons (yocto=10^-24), beating the previous best by three orders of magnitude. Their measurement device consists of a few dozen beryllium ions trapped in magnetic and electric fields using a device called a Penning trap. These ions vibrate at between a few mega and kilohertz, frequencies that can be accurately measured by bouncing laser light off the ions and measuring any Doppler shift they cause. Being charged, the ions are highly susceptible to the tiny forces associated with stray magnetic and electric fields, which change the frequency at which the ions vibrate. Hence the super-sensitive measurements. They team says that straightforward modifications should allow them to measure single yoctonewtons in the near future. This sudden leap in sensitivity could cause a problem for the system of SI prefixes, which don't yet come any smaller than yocto."

214 comments

  1. Yocto! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G R Double-E N Leaves
    G R Double-E N Leaves

    It's so easy! Happy-go-lucky!
    We are the world! We did it!
    Hyuu! Hyuu! Hyuu! Hyuu! Osu! Osu! Osu! Osu! (Ai!)
    Yocto! Yocto!
    Daigaku gohgaku
    Yocto! Yocto!
    Shachoh shuunin
    Happa ichimai areba ii. Ikite iru kara lucky da!

    Yocto! Yocto!
    Tohsen kakujitsu
    Yocto! Yocto!
    Nihon daihyoh
    Yannaru kurai kenkoh da.
    Everybody say yocto!

    1. Re:Yocto! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Hey, you got the ending wrong. That should have been "Klaatu barada yocto!"

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Yocto! by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 1

      G R Double-E N Leaves G R Double-E N Leaves

      It's so easy! Happy-go-lucky! We are the world! We did it! Hyuu! Hyuu! Hyuu! Hyuu! Osu! Osu! Osu! Osu! (Ai!) Yocto! Yocto! Daigaku gohgaku Yocto! Yocto! Shachoh shuunin Happa ichimai areba ii. Ikite iru kara lucky da!

      Yocto! Yocto! Tohsen kakujitsu Yocto! Yocto! Nihon daihyoh Yannaru kurai kenkoh da. Everybody say yocto!

      I changed the minds of a nation and all I got was this stupid song written in my honor.

      --
      A B A C A B B
  2. This is no big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is no big deal.

    1. Re:This is no big deal. by f3rret · · Score: 1

      Well to theoretical physicists and cosmologists it is.

      Any deviation to Newtonian gravity at atomic scale might end up proving the presence of alternate brane universes or give empirical evidence that could offer new insights into the nature of the universe as it is envisioned by M-theory.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    2. Re:This is no big deal. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      alternate brane universes

      Giant branes? The answer is 42.

  3. This is a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Big Fucking Deal

  4. Huh? by Rallias+Ubernerd · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Your comming up with miniscule amounts of movement, and your worrying about finding the proper prefix? Who hasn't hearsd of Scientific Notation?

    1. Re:Huh? by thedonger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who hasn't hearsd of Scientific Notation?

      I haven't hearsd of it.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:Huh? by cc1984_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your comming up with miniscule amounts of movement, and your worrying about finding the proper prefix? Who hasn't hearsd of Scientific Notation?

      Scientific notation may be good in science, bad for general press.

      Can you imagine someone selling a 1x10^12B HardDrive?

    3. Re:Huh? by Thanshin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who hasn't hearsd of Scientific Notation?

      I haven't hearsd of it.

      Don't worry, you have a large selection of hearsding aids to choose from.

      As long as you have good sighst...

    4. Re:Huh? by Rallias+Ubernerd · · Score: 0

      I thought they measured hard drives in bytes, which is powers of two. And if everyone knew of it, we wouldn't have such a problem with nitwits.

    5. Re:Huh? by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      "... bytes, which is powers of two ..."

      The "B" in "1x10^12B" does refer to Bytes. Had he used a small "b" it would have been bits (which are binary and can be measure in powers of 2).

      The example represents 1 PB (PetaByte)

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    6. Re:Huh? by Kentari · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even without reverting to scientific notation or a new SI-prefix they can go down to 0.001 yN before anyone starts to complain. That's 3 orders of magnitude beyond what they claim to be able to measure "soon" and 5 beyond what they did.

      And besides that, popular press doesn't seem to have problems with reverting to "100 million billions of bytes or kilometers", so why not "millionths of yN". It's not as if anyone still has a feel for these numbers beyond "peta" or "femto"... except for the scientists that run into them.

    7. Re:Huh? by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      They've never sold hard drives that way. Not since I can remember anyway, and that goes back to my first 540 MB hard drive.

      For hard drive manufacturers, one megabyte is 1,000,000 bytes.

    8. Re:Huh? by wisnoskij · · Score: 2, Informative

      And a quick look at SI prefix history (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix#List_of_SI_prefixes) will show you that they have been slowly expanding that table anyways (as it was needed most likely).

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    9. Re:Huh? by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who hasn't hearsd of Scientific Notation?

      I haven't hearsd of it.

      Don't worry, you have a large selection of hearsding aids to choose from.
      As long as you have good sighst...

      And if you don't have good sighst, I hearsd that there's a way to fix that as long as you can tatse well.

    10. Re:Huh? by TwiztidK · · Score: 1

      Hardrives are measured in bytes, 10^5 bytes is a gigabyte. However, memory is also measured in bytes, 2^30 bytes is a gibibyte (although often refered to as a gigabyte).

      --
      Sent from my iPhone 5
    11. Re:Huh? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I'd support measuring bytes in scientific notation if only to stop the dubious and pedantic "it's gibibyte" claims. (I've never heard anyone refer to it as gibi etc when speaking it.)

    12. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "... bytes, which is powers of two ..."

      The "B" in "1x10^12B" does refer to Bytes. Had he used a small "b" it would have been bits (which are binary and can be measure in powers of 2).

      The example represents 1 PB (PetaByte)

      That reminds me of an introductory CompSci class that I took in community college. A student asked the teacher:

      Student: "What's the difference between a byte and a bit?"

      Teacher: "Seven."

      I laughed out loud, noone else in the class got it.

    13. Re:Huh? by fiddley · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait 'til the teachers get told to start teaching this gibi crap at school. Suddenly all the recent graduates are talking exbi this and zebi that and you're still talking exa and zetta, and all of a sudden you're looking like a dibinosaur.

      --
      If medicine were ever perfected, we'd all be the same.
    14. Re:Huh? by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... because YoctoNewton is a unit that appears in general press all the time.

    15. Re:Huh? by cc1984_ · · Score: 3, Funny

      +1x10^0 insightful :)

    16. Re:Huh? by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      That's odd... I always though a gigabyte was 10^9. 10^5 seems like a really odd number for that sort of thing.

    17. Re:Huh? by TwiztidK · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I fail at math today. I realized it was wrong as soon as I clicked submit...but it was already too late.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone 5
    18. Re:Huh? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      This humorous thread has gotten a bit offtopic, but I'd like to unhumorously add that there's a surgical procedure that will cure nearsighstedness, farsighstedness, astigmatism, and cataracts, all at the same time.

      The downside is you're paying $15,000 to have needles poked in your eyes.

    19. Re:Huh? by cc1984_ · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How many people knew what a terabyte was 10 years ago?

      How many people know what a petabyte is now?

      In any case, your reply shouldn't be directed at me. I have no intention of using YoctoNewton more than three times in a sentence. What I was getting at is that scientific notation is not mainstream.

      I was addressing this point:

      Who hasn't hearsd of Scientific Notation?

    20. Re:Huh? by flanaganid · · Score: 0

      But if you don't have good sighst or good hearsding, then your other sesnes will be heightsened.

    21. Re:Huh? by vegiVamp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. For hard drive marketing people, one megabyte is 1,000,000 byte, just as for ISP marketing people, unlimited is until we tire of you.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    22. Re:Huh? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      As long as they can measure it in Libraries of Congresses, I'm okay with it.

    23. Re:Huh? by profplump · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't, you'd buy a 12th generation drive. Or maybe a "Double 12G" drive if you went for the 2x10^12 model. Or some other name that can be incremented but is not strictly tied to the drive size.

      It's not like marketing names are strictly tied to SI unit names, and they already print "1 TB = 1,000,000,000,000" in the fine print on the box to declare the actual size, so printing 1X10^12 would actually be simpler than the status quo.

    24. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just trying to figure out that typo, since the cited reference is correct, but the posted information above is wrong.

      The is also the potential confusion over the difference between referring to hard-drives and memory as being different, since hard-drives are simply long-term memory. The usual comparison is I think:
      Hard-drives vs RAM
      which becomes
      long-term memory vs short-term memory

    25. Re:Huh? by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Sadly, and perversely, most disk drive manufacturers count a megabyte as 2^20 bytes, but a gigabyte as a thousand megabytes i.e 10^3 * 2^20 bytes and a terabyte as a million megabytes i.e. 10^6 * 2^20 bytes. Crazy, but true at least until a couple of years ago; I haven't been disk shopping recently.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    26. Re:Huh? by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      Hardrives are measured in bytes, 10^5 bytes is a gigabyte. However, memory is also measured in bytes, 2^30 bytes is a gibibyte (although often refered to as a gigabyte).

      10^5 is a gigabyte?? Wouldn't that be 10^9 equals a gigabyte?

      If not... dang I've wasted a lot of money

    27. Re:Huh? by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      As long as they can measure it in Libraries of Congresses, I'm okay with it.

      One yLoC == what? a word?

    28. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, it's spelled: H E R T Z

    29. Re:Huh? by TwiztidK · · Score: 1

      Hard-drives are usually refered to as "storage" as opposed to "memory". The reason I used both of them in my example was to point out that hard-drives are measured in Base 10 multiples of bytes while RAM is measured in Base 2 multiples of bytes.

      Sorry about the 10^5 mistake. It definitely is 10^9, though my value for a gibibyte was correct.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone 5
    30. Re:Huh? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      The micro and smaller prefixes weren't officially part of the metric system until 1960, although micro was in wide use by engineers before that. When I was very young millimicrofarad was a common unit.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    31. Re:Huh? by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think a yLoC is a character in a Shakespere play.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    32. Re:Huh? by jd · · Score: 1

      The one after Yocto is Politico.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    33. Re:Huh? by lewiscr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And if you've got poor tatse, there's always goatse.cx

    34. Re:Huh? by idji · · Score: 1

      The next unit should be xonto for (-27) and xotta for +27. that fits in with the pattern that zetta/zepto and yotta/yocto make.

    35. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who hasn't hearsd of Scientific Notation?

      I haven't hearsd of it.

      Don't worry, you have a large selection of hearsding aids to choose from.

      As long as you have good sighst...

      And if you don't have good sighst, I hearsd that there's a way to fix that as long as you can tatse well.

      I wouldn't touhc that with a 10 foot poel

    36. Re:Huh? by oncebitter · · Score: 1

      I thought after zepto came groucho, harpo and chico?

    37. Re:Huh? by Decollete · · Score: 1

      You could have blamed it on a Wikipedia troll to save your math some face.

  5. SI Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sudden leap in sensitivity could cause a problem for the system of SI prefixes which don't yet come any smaller than yocto."

    Simple. Call them deciyoctos, centiyoctos, miliyoctos, microyoctos, etc. The problem will be solved forever. It's not like we will find anything smaller.

    1. Re:SI Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Simple. Call them deciyoctos, centiyoctos, miliyoctos, microyoctos, etc. The problem will be solved forever. It's not like we will find anything smaller.

      On Slashdot you never can be sure if you are reading a joke from a genius or a line from an idiot.

    2. Re:SI Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On Slashdot you never can be sure if you are reading a joke from a genius or a line from an idiot.

      It's Slashdot, it's ALWAYS the latter.

    3. Re:SI Issue by Stooshie · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL. We could have yoctoyoctos or even yoctoyoctoyoctos.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    4. Re:SI Issue by linzeal · · Score: 1

      How about using scientific notation like a sane person who has a B.S. Prefixes are for manufacturing and consumers not r and d.

    5. Re:SI Issue by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      It only starts getting cumbersome at 1,000th of a yoctonewton, so until we reach that point, use fractions. Oh nooooooooo!

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    6. Re:SI Issue by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 1

      Yoyoctomomma?

      Cheers,

      b&

      --
      All but God can prove this sentence true.
    7. Re:SI Issue by Alarindris · · Score: 1

      Giggitygiggity!

    8. Re:SI Issue by drachenfyre · · Score: 1

      Except when it's the former :)

    9. Re:SI Issue by matt4077 · · Score: 1

      Quote at the bottom: "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Since stupidity has no limits, and genius has, P(idiot) is inf/(not inf).

    10. Re:SI Issue by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It has been a rule that you cannot combine SI prefixes, but there's already a demonstrated need to be able to combine both metric and binary prefixes in the case of certain magnetic media (the 1.44 "MB" floppy disk has both a 1000 kilo- factor and 1024 kilobinary- factor, and if you could combine prefixes, it would be either a 1.44 KiKB or 1.44 KKiB floppy (kibikilobyte or kilokibibyte).

      It could also be used to have a decakilogram (10*10^3 or 10^4 grams). But not a millikilogram as that would just be a gram. If the rules allowed it, it should also disallow combining expanding and shrinking units (decakilogram (DKg) not centimegagram (cMg), and decimilligram (dmg) not hectomicrogram (Hug(*))) to avoid overlap. This would also allow milliyoctonewtons (myN) for octillionths of a newton until such time as an SI term was established.

      (*) I can't seem to get /. to accept the mu character for micro.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    11. Re:SI Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you hit a thousand yoctos in a row, you can call that a kiloyocto.

    12. Re:SI Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like we will find anything smaller.

      So they haven't found your penis yet?

    13. Re:SI Issue by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Tell me when will you be mine,
      Tell me yocto yocto yocto.

  6. Computer science is, as always, superior. by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, hereby, propose the diminewtons.

    They should've started from the tiniest entity, like we CSs did with the bits.

    They won't hear us complain of not having a name for portions of a yotabit.

    1. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      so in an analog world, what is the smallest unit then?

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    2. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by thijsh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Zero

    3. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      Assuming Thanshin is not a complete idiot, I think you just got Whooooooooshed.

    4. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on what we're talking about. Probably Planck units is about the best we can do, so starting with ~10^-100-ish would be a good first guess.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    5. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on what we're talking about. Probably Planck units is about the best we can do, so starting with ~10^-100-ish would be a good first guess.

      Hmm.. I first read that as "~10^-whoosh-ish"

    6. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe -1 is smaller then 0.

    7. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the wikipedia article you link, a PlankNewton would be 10^-44 newtons.

    8. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Assuming Thanshin is not a complete idiot, I think you just got Whooooooooshed.

      Maybe (+1 Not a complete idiot) would be a bit contemptous, but I think it's time we get a (-1 Whoosh).

      Or maybe a (+0 Whoosh).

    9. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fig. The prefix should definitely be fig.

    10. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit is not the smallest amount of information, the amount of information given by the occurrence of an event is inversely proportional to the probability of the event. A bit is the information given by an event that has a 50% chance of occuring, something that is more likely to happen gives us less information when it happens

    11. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by mea37 · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite following you here. I'll admit my physics is pretty rusty, but your own article puts the Plank unit of force at something on the order of 10^44 Newtons... so if we used that as the basic unit of force, not only wouldn't we have a prefix for a number of force units representing the smallest force we can detect; we wouldn't even have a prefix for a number of force units representing the weight of any every-day object.

    12. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by mea37 · · Score: 1

      I don't see much support for the argument that the world at microscopic scales is analog.

    13. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speaking as a fairly technichal person who installed and dual booted ubuntu and vista, and as a self elected rep. for the everyman, really why the hell do we need to measure forces this small!?!?

    14. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as smallest unit in an analog world. If there is, it would be a digital world.

    15. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, -1 is lower than 0. it is also bigger than 0, just in another direction than you were thinking of.

    16. Re:Computer science is, as always, superior. by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Well you are definitely right in that you don't follow: "what is the smallest unit then" "it depends on what we're talking about." Planck areas or volumes would be much smaller than 10^-44.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  7. Uncertianty Principle by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 1, Interesting

    At that small of values the uncertianty principle probably plays a big role in error. I wonder if they considered that.

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    1. Re:Uncertianty Principle by Tar-Alcarin · · Score: 4, Funny

      They may or may not have. It's impossible to tell.

    2. Re:Uncertianty Principle by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      At that small of values the uncertianty principle probably plays a big role in error. I wonder if they considered that.

      Probably not. After all, physicists aren't requiered to know about physics.

      Wait a second...

    3. Re:Uncertianty Principle by khallow · · Score: 1

      If we had sociology majors doing this stuff, we wouldn't have to consider these sorts of questions.

    4. Re:Uncertianty Principle by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      If we had sociology majors doing this stuff, we wouldn't have to consider these sorts of questions.

      Because it would already have been answered by a committee of government technocrats?

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    5. Re:Uncertianty Principle by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, these guys definitely should've consulted with you first for basic physics concepts.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    6. Re:Uncertianty Principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, I'm sure they didn't take into consideration that basic piece of physics knowledge you picked up on high school.

    7. Re:Uncertianty Principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're measuring the velocity of the atoms but not their positions. However, their positions are constrained.

      h/4pi is only about 10^-34 Nms. If the containment is O(1um) then delta p can be about 10^-28 Ns. A force applied over a long time like a second *could* therefore be measured to 10^-24 N. If the force is applied for longer, even finer measurements would be possible. What they can't do is see a force of that magnitude applied for a very small time. If you could arrange a force of that order which only lasted for 1us, they wouldn't be able to detect it.

    8. Re:Uncertianty Principle by khallow · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more that there wouldn't uncertainty in the answer.

    9. Re:Uncertianty Principle by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      But the question scientists are asking is, "Is there any beer in the fridge?

    10. Re:Uncertianty Principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that small of values the uncertianty principle probably plays a big role in error. I wonder if they considered that.

      No. They're complete morons. Sheesh. Say, you're not related to this guy are you?

  8. Look at last fiew SI prefixes by ATestR · · Score: 1, Informative

    zepto
    yocto

    Seems like the logical next steps would be prefixes starting with x, then w, etc. So:

    xocto
    wupto
    vecto
    etc.

    I doubt that the measurement of forces will go that many more orders of magnitude beyond where they're already measuring things.

    --
    âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
    1. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      No, but we'll need for them for other things. What will we do after Apple makes the iPod Yocto?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      zepto
      yocto

      Seems like the logical next steps would be prefixes starting with x, then w, etc. So:

      xocto
      wupto
      vecto
      etc.

      I doubt that the measurement of forces will go that many more orders of magnitude beyond where they're already measuring things.

      Yeah, but what are the base2 derived prefixes? zebti, yobti, xobti, wubti, vebti, etc?

    3. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Hold my hat, I'm off to the trademark office to register those names and variations, as well as buy the .com .net and .org!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by imakemusic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What will we do after Apple makes the iPod Yocto?

      Isn't it obvious? We'll bitch about how useless and locked-down it is whilst simultaneously posting at least two stories a day that say how it is changing the world.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    5. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Lose it while trying to pick it up with the included iTweezer?

    6. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by operagost · · Score: 1

      Then harpo, then groucho. Either this force is tiny, or my newton meter has stopped.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even need prefixes for small fractions (1/1024th, 1/(1024^2), etc.) of a single bit?

    8. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by nomoreunusednickname · · Score: 1

      it's exbi, zebi, yobi, and then... wuib, vebi? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix

    9. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about taco, as in taconewtons. Yum!

    10. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zepto
      yocto

      Seems like the logical next steps would be prefixes starting with x, then w, etc. So:

      xocto
      wupto
      vecto
      etc.

      I think your list is incorrect: I don't see Chico, Harpo, Groucho, Gummo, or Zeppo.

    11. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      I doubt that the measurement of forces will go that many more orders of magnitude beyond where they're already measuring things.

      Turn your card in at the doo....oh 7 digit UID.

      Saying "${THING} will be {big|small} enough to do something forever" is pretty much a guarantee that it will last as a limit for a very brief time.

    12. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by bughunter · · Score: 1

      People who use those prefixes in spoken English wind up sounding like Bruce Cosby's Mushmouth character.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    13. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      etceteracto

    14. Re:Look at last fiew SI prefixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to the Groucho, Zeppo, Gummo, Harpo and Chico units then?

  9. Doppler effect? I don't know... by vsage3 · · Score: 1

    The doppler effect to me is a very specific phenomenon whereby there is a shift in perceived wavelength when there is relative motion between a source emitting waves and the observer. The article talks about lattice vibrations being the source of the shift (these vibrations are referred to as "phonons" by physicists), which has nothing to do with relative motion.

    1. Re:Doppler effect? I don't know... by vsage3 · · Score: 1

      Silly me! These are a few ions, and hence there are no phonons since there is no crystal structure. Still, I would like to know exactly what they mean by "vibrations"

    2. Re:Doppler effect? I don't know... by niklask · · Score: 1

      From the article itself:

      Their kit consists of a few dozen beryllium ions trapped in magnetic and electric fields using a device called a Penning trap. These ions vibrate at between a few mega and kilohertz, frequencies that can be accurately measured by bouncing laser light off the ions and measuring any Doppler shift they cause.

      Me thinks you forgot to read the part about bouncing photons off the ions. The ions will be moving relative to the photons due to the vibrations.

    3. Re:Doppler effect? I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ions are crystallized, but the only vibrational mode that matters is the symmetric center-of-mass vibrational mode. It's right there in the paper.

      They excite this one specific vibrational mode and use the Doppler shift in a detection laser to detect the resulting ion motion.

  10. It's 10E-24 by ugen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is an accepted mathematical (and computer) notation for it. Please use that - there is no need to resort to the equivalent of emoticons.

    As an aside, why does every possible potential fraction of a unit need it's own prefix? Unless it is widely used to warrant a prefix, using a numeric power is just fine. Somehow I doubt these units will be common enough for anyone to even remember. SI is really going overboard on this, taking an idea to absurdity.

    1. Re:It's 10E-24 by lurgyman · · Score: 1

      Or even 1e-24 if you wanna get super technical ;)

    2. Re:It's 10E-24 by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      You don't do a lot of actual sound-based talking to people, I guess. "One zlotnikNewton" rolls off the tongue quite a lot smoother than "one to the power of minus 24 Newton".

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    3. Re:It's 10E-24 by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      That does, however, break down when you say "One Yoctonewton" and then have to immediately add "that's ten to the minus 24". Words are only efficient if people actually know what they mean!

      Even regularly dealing with extreme orders of magnitude, pretty much everyone I work with knows from 'nano' to 'tera' and then just automatically switches to powers of ten.

    4. Re:It's 10E-24 by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      The same is true when talking about, say, recursive structures in an object-oriented context.

      Words are at their most useful in conversations with people who know what you're talking about. News at 11.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    5. Re:It's 10E-24 by xaxa · · Score: 1

      When you are comparing lots of values the prefix is useful, also when reading/speaking them.

      "We measured forces of 12.0yN, 25.2yN, 124yN and 3529yN" is more easily processed (by my brain at least!) than "We measured forces of 12.0e-24 N, 25.2e-24 N, 124e-24 N and 3529e-24 N". Note that I wrote 3529yN rather than 3.529zN, it's clearer.

      (How far did you travel to work? 7.5km, or 7.5e3 m?)

    6. Re:It's 10E-24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an accepted mathematical (and computer) notation for it. Please use that - there is no need to resort to the equivalent of emoticons.

      As an aside, why does every possible potential fraction of a unit need it's own prefix? Unless it is widely used to warrant a prefix, using a numeric power is just fine. Somehow I doubt these units will be common enough for anyone to even remember. SI is really going overboard on this, taking an idea to absurdity.

      Simple, when talking about this in the lab, do you really think they want to have to say:

      'one hundred and seventy four times ten to the negative twentyfourth power newtons'

      instead of 174 yoctonewtons everytime they want to refer to this?

    7. Re:It's 10E-24 by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Well, on the other side it's pretty handy. I'd hate to have to use scientific notation to tell someone the size of a harddrive I just bought.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    8. Re:It's 10E-24 by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      Prefixes can be combined anyways. Milliyocto and microyocto would satisfy 10^-27 and 10^-30, respectively. This is similar to older papers that I have seen in which micromicro was substituted for pico (i.e., uuM for pM). It would only become annoying after yoctoyocto (10^-48). One yocto is silly enough.

    9. Re:It's 10E-24 by plover · · Score: 1

      One yocto is silly enough.

      And 640 yocto ought to be silly enough for anyone.

      --
      John
    10. Re:It's 10E-24 by Metrathon · · Score: 1

      PeIsn't it annoying when somebody steps in to clear up things and can't get it right?

    11. Re:It's 10E-24 by bughunter · · Score: 1, Informative

      Umm.... that would be equal to one.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    12. Re:It's 10E-24 by bughunter · · Score: 1

      You're the second person in this thread to make that error. If we're talking about very large exponents for powers of one, we will never run out of prefixes.

      That's because one to the Nth power is one... for all values of N.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    13. Re:It's 10E-24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you screwed it up. It would be 1E-24, i.e. 1 * 10^-24 would be 1 yoctoNewton.

    14. Re:It's 10E-24 by milnivlek · · Score: 1

      Umm.... that would be equal to one.

      Nope. "1E-24" doesn't denote "1^-24", but rather "1 x 10^-24". The E (or e) notation always implies a multiplication by "10^..."

    15. Re:It's 10E-24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... no? The 'E' (or 'e') is for scientific notation, not exponentiation. 1E-24 = 1 times 10 to the -24th. To summarize the points of the posts above yours: one guy said that 10^-24 should be rewritten as 10E-24, but then the next guy pointed out that actually it's 10^-24 = 1E-24. (Btw, 10E-24 = 1E-23.)

    16. Re:It's 10E-24 by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      That's because one to the Nth power is one... for all values of N.

      I'm calling B.S. on that. One to the millionth power is, like, a million ones! That's at lot more than one one, so it has got to be more than one. You must feel really stupid now, lol. You fail math 4evah.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    17. Re:It's 10E-24 by dewilso4 · · Score: 1

      I propose the prefix prefix notation. milliyocto = 10^-27, yoctoyoctoyocto = 10^-72

    18. Re:It's 10E-24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, you are completely wrong. It's the same with "tera". Do you know off the top of your head what a thousand terabytes is? It's an exabyte right... or was it petabyte... anyway you're not sure.

      Fast forward ten years, to 2020, and you will use whatever it is (I think petabyte) as commonly as we use "terabyte". Also, you might not remember, but a few years ago, tera was NOT on the tip of anyone's tongue. Even earlier, people didn't know giga. You are just completely wrong that a certain portion of the prefixes won't be very commmon for a lot of uses...

  11. Low mass gravity measurements by forand · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Haven't had time to read the article but it would amazing if force measurements at these levels could be conducted between well characterized masses to validate general relativity at low mass short distance scales.

    1. Re:Low mass gravity measurements by eggoeater · · Score: 1

      There's a couple of problems with any validation of general relativity short distance scales. Pretty much any measurement you take would fall within the range of experimental error due to things like Brownian motion and quantum effects of working at such a small scale. ...

    2. Re:Low mass gravity measurements by radtea · · Score: 1

      Haven't had time to read the article but it would amazing if force measurements at these levels could be conducted between well characterized masses to validate general relativity at low mass short distance scales.

      The value of G is 6.67x10-11 N*m**2/kg**2

      So the Newtonian force between 1 kg masses as 1 m is 12 or so orders of magnitude larger than this device can measure... BUT, there is no way of coupling six atoms gravitationally--they have masses ~10-25 kg. And using the Earth or something like that as the test mass won't do, at least not easily, as it is full of non-idealities.

      GR has already been tested pretty well at terrestrial scales--GPS accuracy depends on getting the GR corrections right, for example. This kind of thing might eventually push those limits down from 1000's of m to m, and that's always a good thing, but gravity is such a weak force that even with this kind of astonishing sensitivity it is going to be tricky.

      With regard to the silly concern about prefixes, which seems to be about the only aspect of this work accessible to the average reader here, the usual thing physicists do is invent new units of convenience, like the "barn" for cross-sections.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:Low mass gravity measurements by Steve+Max · · Score: 2, Interesting

      GR (or actually, the Newtonian approximation) has been tested down to distances of ~1mm; for two ~1kg masses, that would be a force of ~10^-4 N. We don't want to get "G" to a better precision (well, we do, but that's not the point of those experiments); we want to see if at small distances the force deviates from the expected (1/r) behaviour. Such a deviation would mean that there are more than 4 spacetime dimensions (with the extra dimensions being compactified, meaning they have a size of only a small fraction of a meter). If we could reliably measure gravity down to some yN, we could test it at REALLY small distances. That would be a real test for extra dimensions, and indirectly a real test for string theory*.

      * = of course, string theorists will always get the size of their extra dimensions to something orders of magnitude smaller than whatever can be tested; after all, they can't have a falsifiable theory, can they?

  12. Work on it by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...And yet still not sensitive enough to measure how fast I jumped when my niece recently asked me if I wanted a Miley Cyrus ticket too.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Work on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor do they have measurements sensitive enough to weigh the contents of your wallet after attending a Miley Cyrus concert (after t-shirts, $7 for a beer, parking, and all those bare essentials).

  13. Still not sensitive enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...to detect the attractive force a Linux nerd radiates out to women.

    1. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by wc_paladin · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you admit it's an attractive force.

    2. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Only problem there is that you really don't need to measure the "weak attractive force" that a Linux nerd radiates toward women as it is completely swamped by the "strong repulsive force" also radiated in the same direction.

    3. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Maybe it technically is a force that attracts, although anyone who's experienced it would hardly call it attractive...

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    4. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      All forces are attractive at near infinite distance.

    5. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

      If it's a weak attractive force like gravity, then if you had a really large, billion solar mass supermassive Linux nerd you'd have inescapable attraction.

    6. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you admit it's an attractive force.

      Repulsion is just negative attraction :-)

    7. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by qaroliner · · Score: 1

      ...............coz there is none

    8. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by jd · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether you are referring to the Linuxium or anti-Linuxium form of the particle.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      "Near infinite" distance? I live just beyond infinity, so that must be my neighbour.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:Still not sensitive enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be negative.

  14. Faptometer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I formally propose the fapto as the prefix for the next smallest increment. Acceptance of the faptometer won't fulfill me as a person, but it should make me happy for a couple of minutes.

    1. Re:Faptometer? by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      FaptoNewton?

      Well some people could find old Isaac attractive i guess...

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  15. this thread of course will devolve by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    into a bunch of humorous suggestions for the name of units smaller than yocto

    allow me to start the noble proceedings:

    mosquito-newtons

    eensyteensy-newtowns

    feelingsofinadequacy-newtons

    napoleoncomplex-newtowns

    wheredididropit-newtons

    2009GNP-newtons

    loco-newtons

    gonzo-newtons

    artdeco-newtons

    your turn

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:this thread of course will devolve by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1
    2. Re:this thread of course will devolve by maxume · · Score: 1

      Liebnizes.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:this thread of course will devolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      marx-newtons
      groucho-newtons
      harpo-newtons
      chico-newtons
      zeppo-newtons
      gummo-newtons

    4. Re:this thread of course will devolve by ChinggisK · · Score: 1

      ounceo-newton and poundo-newton. Just to confuse the hell out of everyone when the usual flame wars erupt.

    5. Re:this thread of course will devolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FigNewtons

    6. Re:this thread of course will devolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually people don't seem to be jumping on this suggestion too hard.

      If only there were a measurement to show that.

    7. Re:this thread of course will devolve by spambucket235 · · Score: 1

      fig-newtons

  16. Advertisement Opportunity by RealErmine · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sudden leap in sensitivity could cause a problem for the system of SI prefixes which don't yet come any smaller than yocto.

    I say that the SI authority open the floor for commercial advertisers to sponsor smaller prefixes.

    Future announcements might include: "Physicists break force measurement record with device sensitive to 10 Applenewtons."

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    1. Re:Advertisement Opportunity by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      You mean, iNewtons.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    2. Re:Advertisement Opportunity by eggoeater · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it wouldn't be anything that cool... it would be more like ComcastNewtons, DisneyNewtons, or ExxonNewtons.

  17. Ob. Star Wars reference by tomhudson · · Score: 0

    "I sense a disturbance in the forc .. another distur ... another dist... anothe ... MAKE IT STOP!"

  18. So what does this mean? by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

    In laymans terms, what does this actually mean?

    From how many hundreds of miles away can we detect a sparrow fart? Or more slashdot related, how many miles away can someone detect my unencrypted wireless AP?

    --
    Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    1. Re:So what does this mean? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In laymans terms, they can now detect the force emanating from a single midichlorian.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:So what does this mean? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      In laymans terms, what does this actually mean?

      Well, if you consider it from an atomic scale, it's a substantial force. On a proton, a force of this magnitude would produce an acceleration of about 10,000 G's. For the obligatory car analogy, a car of mass 700 kg which experienced the same acceleration would be subjected to about 72 meganewtons (in imperial units, that's 16 million pounds of force).

      At the relevant length scales, these forces are not particularly small. It's still amazing that we can measure them at all, however.

  19. Great Scott! by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 0

    Dr Brown didn't know what a Gigawatt was when Marty got to 1955!

    IMarv

  20. I'm displeased by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Not one Obi-wan Kenobi quote in the whole thread yet. None of you are geeks. You're just nerds. NERDS!

    1. Re:I'm displeased by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      At the risk of starting a vi-vs-emacs style flamewar, I think they prefer the term "trekkers". :)

    2. Re:I'm displeased by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1
      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    3. Re:I'm displeased by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Yes there was. And I, for one, am PROUD to be a nerd. Maybe you should join the underaged trolls at geek.com?

    4. Re:I'm displeased by xxdinkxx · · Score: 1

      Slashdot: news for nerds. Stuff that matters.

    5. Re:I'm displeased by devent · · Score: 1

      Gorge Lukas ruined SW for me with Episode I. The Force is nothing more then some micro critters swimming in your blood.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    6. Re:I'm displeased by drkim · · Score: 1

      "The Force is nothing more then some micro critters swimming in your blood."

      Oh, great... so now you can tell your doctor, "I was out with this hooker last week, and I think I caught a dose of the Force."

  21. say, that's a good idea by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    the emoticonewton

    or perhaps the :)newton, 8-(newton, :-Pnewton, ;\newton, etc

    this is a great idea you've had! pat yourself on the back

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:say, that's a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>this is a great idea you've had! pat yourself on the back

      I already did that but I only used 174 yoctonetwons so he probably didn't feel it.

  22. beyond yocto by migloo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Logically, 10^-27 would be called xennea
    The recurrence is:
    zepta (Z + hepta=7)
    yocto (Y + okto=8)
    xennea(X + ennea=9)

  23. in proper slashdot parlance, you must:

    1. translate yoctonewtons into libraries of congress units
    2. contemplate a beowulf cluster of them
    3. explain their significance with a car analogy

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:no by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. In any vertical list of sequential positive integers, one entry must always be 'coyboyneal', and one must be'...', which is always followed by the last entry, 'profit'.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:no by Scatterplot · · Score: 1

      4. explain your, for one, acceptance of the new yoctonewtonian overlords.

  24. Re:iPod Yocto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just enough to hold the mandatory 30 second anti-piracy advertisement, followed by the RIAA approved 5 second clip of the song, followed by a 30 second commercial outro.

    All DRM protected and only usable with "trusted" hardware (digitally encrypted at receiver and then decrypted by the new mandatory $500 digital speaker, or $200 earbuds) to keep those evil pirates from infringing.

  25. SI prefixes are lame by fortapocalypse · · Score: 1

    Why are we using non-mathematical language to describe numbers? Just use powers of ten, etc. and be done with it! I like base 2 better, though. Base 10 is a flight-of-fancy. ;)

  26. Turtles all the way down. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "zeppo", duh!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  27. creators' newclear power senses everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    &, is even able to create new 'things' at will. additional 'features' include the ability to re-arrange anything/everything in the wink of an eye. what a 'device', no?

    manufactured 'weather' still sucking badly. seismic activity remains 'normal' (usgs).

    never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators, who understand/sense us on a sub-atomic level, & by every other conceivable measure. you become a member of the creators' wwwildly popular planet/population rescue initiative/mandate simply by wanting to. see you there?

  28. Not that kind of force-sensing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Still can't detect individual midi-chlorians, can it?

  29. Dark Matter? by pavon · · Score: 1

    Could something like this be useful for experiments like the CDMS, which are searching for non-baryonic particles?

  30. I have a solution! by Dialecticus · · Score: 1

    I propose fig as the new SI prefix for 10^-27.

    ...Then again, maybe I'm just hungry.

  31. Prefixes by russotto · · Score: 1

    I could help these guys out with the prefix issue. But after the whole kibi/mebi/gibbi nonsense, I'm not feeling inclined to. They'll have to suffer with what they've got.

  32. they could sell the names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell the names for branding purposes and with this finance several years of studying even weaker forces

    microsoftnewton
    cocacolanewton
    GEnewton

  33. Sensitivity verses practicality by hAckz0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to wonder what exactly they expect to measure with such a device. The premise of the Penning trap device is to use a static magnetic field (magnets) and an electric field (electric circuits) to cap the ends of the device to contain the super cooled, in this case beryllium ions. In order to "measure" external electric fields one has to let in external electromagnetic radiation, which will not come without having some overall effects on the containment vessel and circuitry as well. With external electromagnetic radiation power propagating at r^2 the vessel will get more of a dose than the beryllium ions and the electric field will have some level of modulation which will in turn make the ions vibrate in the axial direction based on the reactance of the containment circuitry, not the primary waveform desired to be measured. Yes, you will measure vibrations at the quantum level, but are you really measuring what you think you are? The device is likely so sensitive that due to the uncertainty principal it may defy us the ability to prove what is actually being measured.

    1. Re:Sensitivity verses practicality by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder what exactly they expect to measure with such a device.

      I have the answer: the net power output of the "magnet motors" you see on youtube.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:Sensitivity verses practicality by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      This was obviously designed by a girl who had a brother that bothered her on car trips with the "I'm not touching you" scheme. Now she can prove he was.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  34. Punching Contest by samkass · · Score: 1

    Let me guess how this experiment started...

    Scientist 1: "Let's see who can punch the softest. You go first!"
    Scientist 2: "I managed to punch with 6 Yoctonewtons! Beat that!"
    Scientist 2: "OW!"
    Scientist 1: "You win."

    --
    E pluribus unum
  35. Yes, no big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just prefix with a second set of units - milliyoctonewton,etc.

  36. I'm glad they did not say "times smaller" by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Both the summary and the article express how much smaller something is, without saying "n times smaller." If you never believed in miracles, here is incontrovertible proof!

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  37. Re:YoctoGoatse!! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Did you know that if you horozontal-mirror that SI chart it looks strangely like an ASCII Goatse?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  38. Re:iPod Yocto by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least it will be less of a mess than Linux audio.

  39. and how could we forget by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    fignewtons

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  40. They could have avoided this problem... by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    The obvious next steps below Zepto would be Grouchto, Harpto, and Chicto. If they'd followed the logical course they'd be set for another two orders of magnitude, instead of having to come up with a new name in the middle of a recession. Do they think SI prefixes grow on trees or something?

    1. Re:They could have avoided this problem... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Do they think SI prefixes grow on trees or something?

      Well, someone did suggest fignewtons.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:They could have avoided this problem... by drkim · · Score: 1

      Would a "Harpto" be the measure of one horn honking?

    3. Re:They could have avoided this problem... by argent · · Score: 1

      I loved fig newtons when I was a little kid, but I had no idea what they actually had in them, so I called them "squashed fly biscuits".

  41. Should stem from 10^27 by neko+the+frog · · Score: 1

    As many of us know there is a movement to make "hella-" the SI unit for 10^27.

    Following convention, 10^-27 should therefore be "hello-"

    Which works perfectly, since that makes 10^-27 kitties...

    --
    -- the opinions stated above aren't those of my employer. in fact, they're probably not even my own. you know what, ju
  42. 1000^-9 by autophile · · Score: 1
    Since:

    femto (10^-15) = Danish femtem (15),
    atto (10^-18) = Danish atten (18),
    zepto (1000^-7) = French sept (7) but with a z,
    yocto (1000^-8) = the Greek okto (8) with a y I guess to differentiate from 8,

    ...then it stands to reason the next prefix (1000^-9) will come from some language's 9, preferably one with a t in it. These could be:

    French: neuf
    Greek: ennea
    Latin: novem
    Albanian: nente
    Russian: devyat
    Many Slavic languages: devet

    My money's on devto.

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
    1. Re:1000^-9 by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      An unit of measurement that's smaller than a yocto?

      In English, we call that the "G-spot"

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  43. Next smaller standards by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Should surely be itti and bitti.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  44. The next size smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next size down should use the prefix "Zeppo".

  45. "Smash" is the biggest overstatement you could.. by idji · · Score: 1

    possibly imagine!! it is the tiniest of fathomable gentle nudges!

  46. REVENGE IS OURS!!! by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    Just wait til they try to vote on new standardized names.

    All laughing at us with the kibi and mebibytes stuff... it ain't over.

    BY FAAAAARRRRRR

    MUAHAHAAH!!!

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  47. The smallest force ever detected? Really? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Every scale I’ve ever seen had a “zero”.

    You can now proceed to discuss precision, accuracy, and the difference between the two...

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  48. Detect the Force, You Must (N/t) by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 1

    N/t

    --
    Responsibility is an addiction
    Virtue is a temptation
    Community is a cartel
  49. Don't yet come any smaller than yocto? by mrjb · · Score: 1

    If you look carefully, you'll see they've built in an escape mechanism. zepto, yocto? Sounds like seven and eight to me. Novto, decto would seem sensible continuations. Likewise (novta, decta) on the other end of the prefix spectrum.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  50. Gravitational Constant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The value of "G" itself would be much more finely measurable.

  51. No, It's 1E-24 by Chuck+Lane · · Score: 1
    Dangnabbit, where are my mod points when I need them? This comment is both (1) technically wrong and (2) misguided. It certainly shouldn't be modded ``Insightful''!

    (1) The notation ``bEa'' is shorthand for ``b times 10^a''. Therefore, ``10E-24'' means ``10 times 10^(-24)'' = 10^(-23), which isn't 10^(-24).

    (2) Prefixes may or may not have much in common with emoticons, but they are worth creating. They are very handy for communication, both oral and written. Other posters have made this point, so I won't say any more about it.

    (By the way, should ``dangnabbit'' have one ``b'' or two? I can't find any trustworthy resources on this.)

  52. what? nooo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my wife, who is a physicist, has for years been calling my schlong "yocto" :( :( :(

  53. You Mean 1E-24, Right? -nt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    asdf

  54. Force by dandart · · Score: 1

    The force is stro- no wait.

  55. It's clear... by Scatterplot · · Score: 1

    Once you run out of prefixes, just start using two. Example: milliyoctonewtons.