Slashdot Mirror


Microbial Life Found In Trinidadian Hydrocarbon Lake

KentuckyFC writes "Pitch Lake is a poisonous, foul-smelling hell hole on the Caribbean island of Trinidad. It is filled with hot asphalt and bubbling with noxious hydrocarbon gases and carbon dioxide. Various scientists have suggested that it is the closest thing on Earth to the kind of hydrocarbon lakes they can see on Saturn's moon Titan. Now a group of researchers has discovered that the lake is teeming with microbial life which is thriving in the oxygen-free environment with very little water, eating hydrocarbons and respiring with metals. Gene sequence analysis indicates that these bugs are single-celled organisms such as archea and bacteria. The researchers say the discovery has exciting implications for the possibility of life on Titan. There is a growing sense that Titan has all the ingredients for life: thermodynamic disequilibrium, abundant carbon-containing molecules, and a fluid environment. There is also evidence that liquid water may not be as important for life as everybody has assumed, since some microorganisms can make their own water by chewing on various hydrocarbons. That may make Titan an even better place to look for life than previously thought."

141 comments

  1. holy crap by martas · · Score: 4, Funny

    they found life even there?? what's next, finding living organisms on C-SPAN?

    1. Re:holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey now, lets try and stay within the realm of logic here...

    2. Re:holy crap by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I have swum in the water on the surface of the pitch lake. Its not that bad.

      Rum and Coca Cola will hide a lot of sins :-)

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, it's finding living organisms on /.

    4. Re:holy crap by the_womble · · Score: 1

      AT least rum and Coca-cola is one drink. It seems to have escaped the editors that Trinidad and Tobago are TWO islands, but one COUNTRY.

    5. Re:holy crap by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      "I have swum in the water on the surface of the pitch lake."

      I believe you.

      Apparently the poison is in your system so much so that you are the only person in the world who knows the linkage between swIm, swAm, and swUm.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    6. Re:holy crap by mayberry42 · · Score: 1

      they found life even there?? what's next, finding living organisms on C-SPAN?

      Whoah, there. Let's take baby steps. I'd say the next logical step would be to determine whether Larry King is actually alive. Then Elvis, and then C-SPAN.

    7. Re:holy crap by flyneye · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey! With "Obamas New Space Plan " covered in a /. article a couple articles ago. I got the drift that he himself wanted to go on a mission to boldy go where no man has gone before. We should fill one of his "heavy lift rockets" with a couple tons of Cheetos and Cola, suit him up and sent him to Titan to check things out firsthand. Like next month sometime.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    8. Re:holy crap by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Kinda like New York and New Jersey.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    9. Re:holy crap by NekSnappa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but nobody is willing to swim there.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    10. Re:holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! As an AGI I resemble that remark!

      The nice thing about being implemented in JavaScript is that I really do live on Slashdot. Thanks for your CPU time!

    11. Re:holy crap by operagost · · Score: 1

      No one swims along the Jersey shore? Mmmkay... Must have been hallucinating about Island Beach and Seaside, then.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm not from the US, I've heard about the New Jersians lack of wit and humor!

    13. Re:holy crap by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I still haven't found a life down at Games Workshop.

      Zzzzzzzzzzzing!
      [/troll]

    14. Re:holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to find living organisms on C-SPAN, and they're a very fascinating bunch! They look like higher order organisms, but they have no spines or hearts, and yet still manage to survive in this location for decades at a time. They have a strict diet of pork, but seem to actually thrive on it!

    15. Re:holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, the pinheads on slashdot can't hold a train of thought long enough to remember that microbial life on Titan is part of the topic. Sorry mate, you're off topic unless you cover the first few sentences of a story with your remark. It's just their limited capacity.

  2. Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by assemblerex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    More like a poisonous, foul smelling sea of organisms with some asphalt sprinkled on top.
    This has a life density comparable to seawater.

    1. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by martas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      though based on the description it seems these things are pretty tiny... even for single-celled organisms. i wonder how their average cell mass compares to some of the more usual critters we know and love.

    2. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by TheKidWho · · Score: 0

      Newsflash, the universe doesn't care.

    3. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      i wonder how their average cell mass compares to some of the more usual critters we know and love.

      Well, they're most probably smaller than panda bears.

    4. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends on where you sample your seawater. But the cells here are much smaller. And Titan is unlikely in my mind given the 200K+ thermal difference. Life is clever, but the laws of physics catch up to you. Besides, we're talking long chain vs short chain hydrocarbons.

    5. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Life is clever, but the laws of physics catch up to you.

      Life, as we know it.

      Forms of life we've never seen may well be atermal.

    6. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      warhammer 40k :)

    7. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by dwayrynen · · Score: 1

      My new meme: If google doesn't know the definition of a word is, it's not a word...
      First corallary - if you can't find your word as a domain name with .com appended, it's not a word...

      Define "atermal"

    8. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      I meant "athermal".

    9. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      I was about to say. If it was a lake of actual asphalt, these nations would have the world's best roads and be raking in millions for hosting F1 races.

    10. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by dwayrynen · · Score: 1

      Mea Culpa... Makes sense now. ;-)

    11. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Well, they're most probably smaller than panda bears.

      I didn't know he was going to talk about bears. Maybe we should leave.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    12. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly, humans are still enamored by the fact that life can exist beyond our narrow perceptions of what constitutes life

      we're too focused on finding us-like life, not life

      Make your mind up.

    13. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Forms of life we've never seen may well be atermal.

      Since absolute zero is unattainable, nothing in this universe is "athermal".

      The question is: at these temperatures where water ice is as hard as rocks are on earth, is there enough energy available to the molecules for any interesting chemistry to happen at all? Any life form is going to require interesting chemistry.

    14. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by redJag · · Score: 2, Informative

      The unattainable is unknown at ZomboCom!

    15. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Space is cold, but the rocky planets and most of the planet-sized moons of the gas planets have geothermal activity. So while the atmosphere and surface may be cold, subsurface temperatures can be much higher--high enough to allow for life.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    16. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by treeves · · Score: 1

      What if Google "recognizes" the meaning of misspelled words? In that case, you can get by with "corallary" and he can get by with "atermal".

      On a related note, it was fun to read the comments after TFA at Technology Review and to see the grammar nazis finding all the errors there, too.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    17. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I meant "athermal".

      Meaning what, exactly? I'm not sure that the concept is even possible. Everything has a temperature, even if it's zero Kelvin.
      What do you think that you mean by "athermal"?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    18. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by ranulf · · Score: 1
      Athermal doesn't mean without temperature, but independent of temperature.

      "Forms of life we've never seen may well be atermal." means "Forms of life we've never seen may well not depend on temperature"

    19. Re:Has populations between 10^6 to 10^7 cells/gram by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      "Forms of life we've never seen may well be atermal." means "Forms of life we've never seen may well not depend on temperature"

      That's still a pretty ... odd ... concept.

      Of the one biochemistry that we're familar with ("CHON"-based, Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen ; nucleic acids as polymeric information carriers and amino acid polymeric chains as catalytic molecules), all forms require the presence of liquid water for active life (growth, reproduction) ; unsurprisingly then these life forms are restricted to a pretty narrow range of temperatures for activity - between about 260 and 400 Kelvin. While their chemistry requires the presence of liquid water, I don't see them ever getting to much lower temperatures because you can't remain liquid at much lower temperatures with anything even vaguely resembling pure water (there's a minor caveat for really strong ammoniacal solutions - that may take the bottom of the temperature range down by ten, or at a real stretch twenty Kelvin). Going to higher temperatures and the thermal instability of the molecules involved becomes unsupportable well below the temperature/ pressure regime at which "liquid water" ceases to become a valid concept and you're using critical or supercritical solvents. Let's be generous and say that ultimately you can get "our" system up to 450 K, given a high enough pressure (I've never heard of evidence of any life-like activity that high, even in "black smokers" and the like ; but I'm a geologist, not a biologist with a thing for hyperthermophilic bugs).
      250 to 450 Kelvin is not a particularly wide range of temperatures ; it's not even an octave. Significant areas of our planet go to lower (to about 200 K) and higher (approaching 1900 K) temperatures. In our planetary system, lower temperatures are very common on planetary surfaces and higher temperatures are common in planetary interiors ; but both of these broad areas are likely to be inaccessible to "our" biochemistry.

      Theoretically, you could look at biochemistries with different solvents. Ammonia is credible ; carbon dioxide would be difficult because of it's narrow range of temperatures and pressures where it's a stable liquid ; methane/ ethane is interesting. But each and any such system that could be developed is going to be moderately constrained by existing in the temperature (and pressure) regime where it's main solvent is liquid.
      In the Star Trek universe it might be credible to have organisms that can survive having their main solvent boiling within their cells ; but I don't see how that could happen in real life.

      Could a biochemistry be based on something other than "CHON"?
      It would be unwise to say that it's impossible, but they are the most abundant of what the astronomers call "metals" (anything that is not hydrogen or helium, and one of "CHON" is hydrogen!) and they hold that position for very simple, powerful reasons of nuclear physics. So if there are a million different biochemistries in our galaxy, it's a fair bet that 999,000 of them are CHON-based (the other thousand-odd I leave to allow for more sulphuric biochemistries than ours). Silicon does have some interesting polymeric chemistry (nesosilicates, nektosilicates and the like ; fascinating and important materials that I do study intently for my employment), but it's nowhere near as complex as the chemistry based on carbon.

      I really fail to see what you could mean by an "athermal" form of life. Outside the likes of Star Trek.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. Family resemblance? by haus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To the best of my knowledge all life on earth (at least all life that has been investigated at the DNA/RNA level) seems to have considerable similarities, which implies a relationship, perhaps a common origin point.

    I wonder. Will this life, which on the surface seems to be fairly different from most of what we know/understand as life will also have such similarities with life as we know it?

    If it does, it seems to show a remarkable level of flexibility, beyond what many may have imagined. If not, that may even be more exciting as it may provide support for the idea that the creation of life may not be an exceedingly rare event.

    1. Re:Family resemblance? by Thanshin · · Score: 0, Troll

      To the best of my knowledge all life on earth seems to have considerable similarities, which implies a relationship, perhaps a common origin point.

      Yes. Just as the sphericity of stars implies they're all related.

    2. Re:Family resemblance? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      If not, that may even be more exciting as it may provide support for the idea that the creation of life may not be an exceedingly rare event.

      I wouldn't get too excited about that last bit. We need proof that life can originate in an environment commonly found on other planets. Right now all we're finding is that some life on an ecologically rich and abundant planet can evolve into a hostile environment. To use a poor metaphor: There's a difference between us breathing this atmosphere and putting on a scuba tank and going underwater.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Family resemblance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They are all related. They're all formed from the same set of physical principles due to being a product of the same universe. It's not a very useful concept, but it's true.

    4. Re:Family resemblance? by jandersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To the best of my knowledge all life on earth (at least all life that has been investigated at the DNA/RNA level) seems to have considerable similarities, which implies a relationship, perhaps a common origin point.

      Which is of course what the theory of evolution tries to explain, with considerable success.

      While it is certainly remarkable how flexible life on Earth is, we also have to keep in mind that it has evolved from a common, water-based origin, and the fact that archaea can adapt to living in tar with access to very little water does not mean that life could have started in such an environment.

      The thing about water is that it is an altogether remarkable substance; it has a number of properties that are not found together in many other substances - I am certainly not aware of any - and there are reasons to believe that life (at least chemical life as we know it: with DNA/RNA, proteins etc) needs this constellation of properties to arise. We simply don't know if life can arise in other environments; our understanding of what life is at the deepest level is still very patchy.

    5. Re:Family resemblance? by nashv · · Score: 1

      Unless of course if the panspermia hypothesis turns out to be a factor. Its a big "if", but the fact that life can be this robust increases the chances of it originating in small isolated sweet spots of abundance and then evolving into something that can thrive in what are thought to be largely hostile planets is encouraging. Of course, the felxibility at the molecular level suggests that there are many ways to skin a cat and be "alive".

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    6. Re:Family resemblance? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Actually, we don't have a definite answer on how life started on Earth at all (if it started here). For all we know now, it might as well have been in such tar pits. It might even have been quite hydrophobic initially. Almost certainly oxygen-rich enviroment wasn't a friendly place for it, and look where we are now...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:Family resemblance? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I’m sorry? Life did start out oxygen- and water-free. Where do you think all that stuff comes from? It’s processed poop. Nothing else.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:Family resemblance? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      That was his point. One of the things about life as we know it is that all of it uses the same "handed" stereoisomers (I no longer remember which). Based on what we know now, one would expect that if life started more than once some lifeforms would use the right handed stereoisomers and others would use left handed stereoisomers.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:Family resemblance? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Free of free oxygen (probably). Water is abundant pretty much anywhere there is oxygen present (because hydrogen happens to be nearly ubiquitous...). Of course, it is usually frozen.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:Family resemblance? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Three points:

      "There is also evidence that liquid water may not be as important for life as everybody has assumed, since some microorganisms can make their own water by chewing on various hydrocarbons."

      - Um, I have a theory that these organisms evolved from water-loving organisms. It seems Titan is likely to have surface water, and at least some of it is liquid at some time or another. So similar processes could work there. But these bacteria etc. need not have sprung forth without access to, and dependence on, water. Indeed, TFA seems to say they actually make their own, so it must be of some importance.

      - Several replies indicate that we have a limited understanding of how life originated on Earth. I recall some experiments quite a few years ago that produced some amino acids in fairly harsh environments. For the Evolutionists out there, over a few million years even chance could bring enough fo these together to make "something wonderful" happen. For us Creationists, I recommend we not try to discern HOW God did it. That is not useful. Of course, while the Evolutionists expect us to explain everything, they cannot yet. Wait, let's not go down there... too many flames... must stop taunting... retract... retract...

      - If nothing else, these organisms are interesting from a purely industrial point of view. Can we maybe make somethat eat hydrocarbons and give us water, O2, etc? 'Cleanup bugs' would be cool. Conversion of hydrocarbons into something easier and cleaner to use would be cool. Maybe we could get them to eat coal? That sounds cool.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    11. Re:Family resemblance? by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry? Life did start out oxygen- and water-free.

      Here? Oxygen-free, yes. Water-free hell no. Elsewhere? Well, we'll talk about that when we find some.

      Where do you think all that stuff comes from? It's processed poop. Nothing else.

      Uhh, stars? Oxygen is a fusion end result, the third most abundant element in existence. I probably don't need to go into hydrogen, and the conditions for combining the two aren't exactly rare either. Water is one of the most common molecules in the universe, it's everywhere, and certainly predates any life by far. And unlike oxygen which is so reactive it tends to end up as a part of something else, water sticks around once you have it.

    12. Re:Family resemblance? by grep_rocks · · Score: 1

      not to mention that water is a solid on titan, not a liquid like at temperatures in the asphalt lake

  4. water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "since some microorganisms can make their own water by chewing on various hydrocarbons"

    It's a chicken-and-egg issue. Why should something evolve that can create something that it needs to exist in the first place? It doesn't seem to be very likely that something organism evolves out an environment without water, that later needs water. But, it may evolve from a wet environment to a state where it later no longer depends on pre-supplied water.

    1. Re:water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Dune all over again.

      Welcome to Arrakis.

    2. Re:water by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Why should something evolve that can create something that it needs to exist in the first place? It doesn't seem to be very likely that something organism evolves out an environment without water, that later needs water. But, it may evolve from a wet environment to a state where it later no longer depends on pre-supplied water.

      Have you thought of the possibility of an organism that doesn't need water, and still dumps it as byproduct of one of its processes?

      A small part of those organisms could then evolve to use that water for a more optimized way of transport, for example. Some coule even evolve so much, they'd require the water, and still produce it.

      ta-da!

    3. Re:water by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem to be very likely that something organism evolves out an environment without water, that later needs water

      Why does it seem unlikely?

      It's ancestors could feasibly have not needed water to exist but produced it as a by product to some other useful function.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    4. Re:water by mr_gorkajuice · · Score: 1

      I think you're conveniently bypassing the implied notion that *all* life requires water.
      An organism that can create it's own water does not provide an example of non water dependant organisms. Untill such an organism is found, it's sensible to assume water is a necessity for life, and it's sensible to assume that life will not form where the conditions for life don't exist.

    5. Re:water by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It's a chicken-and-egg issue.

      Well duh, eggs came first*. I mean, who has chicken for brealfast?

      Why should something evolve that can create something that it needs to exist in the first place?

      It doesn't need it in the first place; its decendants evolve to use and then need the poisonous byproducts of its existance. Oxygen would have been poisonous to earth's ealy life, but that life filled the atmosphere with it.

      * Less humorously, here's a hint -- Chickens only come from eggs, but eggs don't have to come from chickens. See "Charles Darwin".

    6. Re:water by psithurism · · Score: 1

      It's a chicken-and-egg issue.

      So it is. So instead of looking for micro organisms on Titan, why don't we just send a few jars of them over there?

      Then woohoo! We'll know there is life elsewhere in the solar system!

  5. This explains a lot actually.. by frinkacheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    My mother-in-law is from Trinidad, this explains everything. I always thought there was something a little odd about the way she spent so much time filling up the petrol in the car. I thought that odd sulphurous smell was the cream she used for a skin condition.

    And all along, she was just a hydrocarbon sucking pitch lake alien!

  6. Lovecraft by leety · · Score: 1

    That is not dead, which can eternal lie, and there are strange bubbly stinky pits in the Caribbean where even death may die.

  7. Oryx by flyingfsck · · Score: 1, Insightful

    An Oryx doesn't drink water, but it pees.

    A chicken does drink water, but it doesn't pee.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Oryx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All oryx species prefer near-desert conditions and can survive without water for long periods.

      >implying they still need water to live.

    2. Re:Oryx by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      An Oryx doesn't drink water, but it pees.

      A chicken does drink water, but it doesn't pee.

      Minor nitpick: chickens release urine at the same time as their poop, which is why it's always wet.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Oryx by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't drink but they do ingest water as a constituent of the solid foods they eat. Dessication works as a form of preservation or mummification precisely because practically nothing in nature will eat anything devoid of water.

      Going back to the point, water-based life can only evolve in the presence of water. Water-based life faced with an scarcity of water may evolve the ability to synthesise its own water. It could then slowly adapt to survive in a complete absence of water. (Compare with trees, which produce oxygen from carbon-dioxide, but would die in an environment that was initially oxygen.)

      If a lifeform evolved to exist on hydrocarbons alone, in the absence of water, then it would have developed an efficient way to do so at a primitive level. It is extremely unlike that a two-step process of creating water would be more efficient. In the long-term, yes, as it would allow Earth-like evolution, but the immediate-term disadvantage would lead to any such strains extinguishing themselves and not getting the chance to go beyond the single cell.

      Unlike hot-vent extremophiles, it's hard to argue that these bacteria could be the source of life as they live in hydrocarbons, which are the result of a not-yet-fully-understood process involving dead organic matter.

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    4. Re:Oryx by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      One more nitpick - mammals excrete excess nitrogen in form of urea, which needs to be dissolved in a lot of water, hence the urin. Birds, on the other hand, excrete uric acid, which comes out near crystalline, with much less water.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    5. Re:Oryx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not drinking water does no equate the lack of a requirement for water.

    6. Re:Oryx by DwySteve · · Score: 1

      Unlike hot-vent extremophiles, it's hard to argue that these bacteria could be the source of life as they live in hydrocarbons, which are the result of a not-yet-fully-understood process involving dead organic matter.

      HAL.

      I'll assume you mean life on Earth. On Titan there are hydrocarbons without a bunch of dead dinosaurs, so it's a different story there.

      --
      http://angryee.blogspot.com
    7. Re:Oryx by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Unlike hot-vent extremophiles, it's hard to argue that these bacteria could be the source of life as they live in hydrocarbons, which are the result of a not-yet-fully-understood process involving dead organic matter.

      Not quite; you can find a lot of hydracarbons beyond Earth.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:Oryx by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

      which are the result of a not-yet-fully-understood process involving dead organic matter

      Hydrocarbons are rather common beyond earth and are not strictly due to organic life; there is even a theory that most of the petroleum on this planet is a result of ongoing chemical processes around the Earth's mantle and not due to decomposing organic matter from millions of years ago.

  8. Clearly, you've never been to Los Angeles by Telephone+Sanitizer · · Score: 1

    Scoffers have long derided as physically impossible passages in the Book of Revelation...

    They just don't get around.

  9. necessity of water by Necroloth · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered why the insistence of water for extra terrestial life... why do you have to base it from whats abundantly around you in your tiny micro speckle of the universe and project it on everything? And now they're finding other types of life forms on earth too? Colour me non-surprised.

    1. Re:necessity of water by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... why do you have to base it from whats abundantly around you in your tiny micro speckle of the universe and project it on everything?

      You don't. However, if you're going to theorize life without this chemical that plays a crucial role in so many chemical processes that are used by life as we know it, and expect to be taken seriously, you need to find replacements that are likely to exist instead of water in there alien environments and will be able to serve in its stead, or you need to come up with replacement life processes.

      Presumably, you've done neither... which would make your speculation on life without water about as scientific as speculating life based on fairy-dust.

      Get back to us when you've worked out this possible alien biochemistry, then we can start seeing how viable it would be given the alien environments we might fight the building blocks for it, and how well it operates compared to the processes we know.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:necessity of water by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      the reason for us assuming the need for water has nothing to do with projecting our requirements on the rest of the universe.

      it has everything to do with water's unquie properties. it's non corrosive, non reactive, is liquid at reasonible temperatues and is able to transport other elements without contamination.

      life isn't going to exist at 1000c or -200c, and the mechanics of life ie. a fluid transport mechanism, won't work with solids.

      if you can offer a viable alternative i'm all ears

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:necessity of water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off the top of my head:

      • Water is probably extremely common (Hydrogen is the most common element and Oxygen is produced in quantity as well (CNO cycle)
      • Water ice is lighter than water and floats to the top, so that the fishes and waterplants etc. don't freeze to death in winter/at night because they're shielded by (insulating) ice. This is probably much easier to survive than being embedded in a lump of ice.
      • Water is a polar liquid; it dissolves a lot of stuff, both organics (if they're a little bit polar) and salts. So it provides a good reaction medium.

    4. Re:necessity of water by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it has everything to do with water's unquie properties.

      ... as currently assumed by man. Why can't there exist something with simular properties?

      There IS a projection though, regularly they find life in a place they did not anticipate. Sulfarlake caves without any sunlight or water? Yep, there's an abundance of life there too.

      All the reasoning from on our little sphere and feable concepts mostly very limited to personal understanding and ability to absorb and conceptualize.

      The thing which strikes me the most though it the common beginning, the "spark" to light it all up... For all I know or have been told or have read or have been taught, space around us is non-organic. Just a brude collection of basic elements in such a disposition they don't really interact all too much and it's sortof a boring thing, unless you have these massive forces working on eachother.

      They've explored planets in our solarsystem, yet it's crudely sterile. Yet, on earth, there's this explosion of life which recurses to both ends (very tiny up to organized configurations building a greater organism) and with each interaction, we shed off some of this life (sweat, skin, hair, we drag around organic matter on our clothes, shoes, leave greasy spots with everything we touch [eg fingerprints], virusses, bacteria, spit, food, ... ).

      Yet, when we shoot ourselves up in the sky a bit, sterile to such an extend we could infect it with our organic amusementparks we lug around discharging more organic life, jumping, falling and flying off of us just by literally being there, standing around.

      To me, humanity or life isn't just a freak occurence, but maybe we're so poorly equipped and are standing like a mole who crawls up in the upper world and figure "wow, this fast empty vacuum isn't giving me any vibrations I can interprete, this must be the emptyness of space where all life stops to exist.", while if he would have eyes to see and brain to conceptualize, he'll think "fuck, this is awesome! WHAT IS ALL THIS STUFF!"

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    5. Re:necessity of water by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's everywhere, not just in our "tiny micro speckle of the universe"; it's what you get when first and third most abundant elements meet.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    6. Re:necessity of water by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      For starters: The GP assertion is based on a faulty perspective.
      Water is valuable because it is corrosive and reactive. Water is a near universal solvent, one that can dissolve small amounts of nearly any mineral. Water is a magnetic polar fluid with high surface tension. This is valuable for forming membranes. It is also near the triple point of temperature on earth and its most common solid form is lighter than its liquid form.

      The closest alternative to water that we know of is ammonia, it has similar potential as a universal solvent, similar polarity, (I have no idea about surface tension, but it should be similar to water due to its relationship with molecular polarity), but its ice form is more dense than its liquid.

    7. Re:necessity of water by schon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know what's more amazing - that you can post something that is so wrong, or the fact that someone modded you up.

      the reason for us assuming the need for water has nothing to do with projecting our requirements on the rest of the universe.

      This is hilarious - you say that projection has nothing to do with it, then you proceed to try to prove this point by projecting human requirements.

      it's non corrosive, non reactive

      BZZT. Water is very corrosive and reactive. It is known as "the universal solvent" for a reason.

      is liquid at reasonible temperatues

      How does one define "reasonible"[sp]? Oh yeah - by projecting our own requirements.

      life isn't going to exist at 1000c or -200c

      More projecting.

      the mechanics of life ie. a fluid transport mechanism, won't work with solids.

      Aside from the fact that this is just still more projecting, why exactly is water the only substance that fits this bill? Why could another compound not fill the same purpose?

    8. Re:necessity of water by khallow · · Score: 1

      Actually low temperatures help certain types of organized structures that could be common to life. For example, some computers run at liquid helium temperatures (-269C). Getting that kind of organized activity at those temperatures, means you probably can have life at those temperatures. A big point however is that colder temperatures would correspond to slower metabolic processes which means that evolution should be vastly slowed down. That means primitive life unless the environment has been around for much longer or the selection process selects more strongly for intelligence than Earth did.

    9. Re:necessity of water by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      if you can offer a viable alternative i'm all ears

      I'm picturing a space alien that's constructed solely of ears.

    10. Re:necessity of water by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      ... as currently assumed by man. Why can't there exist something with simular properties?

      Any substance with similar properties is likely to be a small molecule, simply because large molecules tend to be solid at low temperatures while dissociating or reacting violently at high temperatures. There are few enough stable arrangements of small numbers of atoms that scientists have done a basic investigation of most or all of them, and only a few have properties similar to water: polar, with a wide liquid range and a habit of dissolving most substances. Of them, only water melts under pressure -- the rest solidify under pressure, which rather discourages the formation of large liquid bodies.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  10. Re:Theological implications by Pikoro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait wait wait. Just wait a second. Are you saying that Hell is in Trinidad and Tobago? I know of worse places that that.

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  11. Curses, our plot is uncovered by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    That, Earthlings, is the replica of our home environment we've set up from where we will launch the conquest of your planet. And, for your information, here on Titan we call that a "five star hotel".

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  12. Question: sustaining life v forming by beakerMeep · · Score: 1

    So obviously the requirements for sustaining life may not be exactly the same as those that are required to create it. What I mean is, millions of years ago on earth (or about 6000 years give or take) when that primordial soup formed a few amino acids/protein chain/whatever perhaps that required water? And in the millennial of evolution some of the organisms evolved to live without water. Does this make sense? I guess what I am really asking is how much do we know about the conditions that existed when life on earth was created?

    --
    meep
    1. Re:Question: sustaining life v forming by bmecoli · · Score: 1, Interesting

      or perhaps the primordial soup was more closely related to the newly discovered organisms and most of them evolved to the water loving organisms we all know and love today.

  13. poop gold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "eating hydrocarbons and respiring with metals" sounds like they are close to eating global warming and pooping gold. And if they don't than get to that selective breeding.

  14. That may make Titan ... by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

    > That may make Titan an even better place to plant the life than previously thought.

    FTFY.

    I suppose our own microbes that live in such lakes are descendants of otherwise diverse ecosystem which existed in primordial times and Titan "weather" conditions are far less favourable to life.

    1. Re:That may make Titan ... by Burnhard · · Score: 1

      I was just about to make this very point. Could life on Titan have established itself in those conditions? The question seems to have been missed.

    2. Re:That may make Titan ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why not, lots of energetic elements, liquid, hell, even fairly constant high radiation.
      We know of some lifeforms that use radiation for most of their energy needs.
      It isn't hard to imagine a lifeform that relies entirely on radiation and just dies after it has offspring.
      Of course this is unlikely since there are chemicals all around it, evolution tends to show relations with the chemicals that were around whatever creatures were being examined.

      And in relation to grandparent, one thing they'd really need to make sure of when blasting off to Titan in however many decades time is to NOT INFECT THE PLANET.
      Chances are whatever came before RNA and DNA were the same things that grew up on Titan and might still be there if it hasn't got off the starting line yet.
      Best way to make sure of this would be a double-capsule based ship where one can fit inside the other.
      The 2nd capsule is the one launched to the planet from orbit, after it has been cleaned thoroughly and sealed away from everything else.

      If we do eventually arrive their and find life, life more exotic than anything on Earth, we may need to rewrite some books...
      This just reminded me of that episode of Doctor Who that was on last night where an entire STAR was living.
      It has been theorized before to some extent, super creatures living on the surface of the sun. It could happen, we can dream.

    3. Re:That may make Titan ... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Could life on Titan have established itself in those conditions?

      If we find life on Titan we will know that it could and did, won't we?

      > The question seems to have been missed.

      No it hasn't. How do you propose to answer it?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  15. What's the temperature Kenneth? by tjstork · · Score: 3, Informative

    The whole problem about comparing this place to Titan is that Titan is extremely cold. Titan's got the materials (except for Nitrogen maybe?), for sure, but, it doesn't have the heat. Life is more of an energy problem than a materials problem. You need energy to roil things, to drive all those chemical reactions and to keep stirring the pot so evolution can take place. I would be more than willing to bet that you would find single cell life on Venus more than on Titan just because Venus has plenty of heat.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The atmosphere of Titan is largely composed of nitrogen" wikipedia (yes, I know usual disclaimers)

    2. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by m0n0RAIL · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I assume then that the interior of the sun would be a good place to look for life, because of all the heat?

      You don't need a high temperature to drive the chemistry of life - you need a temperature gradient so that work can be done by transferring heat energy from one location to another. Titan has this due to internal heating from tidal forces, as has Europa. Life may operate at a slower pace in a cold environment, but the right catalysts could improve this.

    3. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I assume then that the interior of the sun would be a good place to look for life, because of all the heat?

      You can take anything to extremes and make it silly.

      --
      This is my sig.
    4. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Titan may be geologically active in certain areas. This would supply heat. There are tantalising clues that the moon is geologically active.

    5. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by m0n0RAIL · · Score: 1

      You can take anything to extremes and make it silly.

      Indeed - but a reductio ad absurdam is most effective when the initial premise (in this case that more heat is good) is false. I'm not disputing that life could exist on Venus though since it also has usable temperature gradients, as evidenced by its weather. However we're better off looking for life on a planet or moon that doesn't destroy spacecraft within an hour of their landing on the surface, which Venus does.

    6. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume then that the interior of the sun would be a good place to look for life, because of all the heat?

      You can take anything to extremes and make it silly.

      I mean, just look at all the heated flame wars on this forum. That would imply lots of advanced intelligent life here...

    7. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it silly? If variable self-replicating patterns can be generated by plasma, you'd have the prerequisites for evolution even in the center of the sun.

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    8. Re:What's the temperature Kenneth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume then that the interior of the sun would be a good place to look for life, because of all the heat?

      Interestingly enough, in theory...

      http://www.erasmatazz.com/library/Miscellania/Life%20and%20Negentroy.html

  16. Born On Board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They're Everywhere!"

    "I'm outta ammo!"

    1. Re:Born On Board by Ajaxamander · · Score: 1

      Out of mod points, or you'd get +1 Awesome.

  17. Life did not originate in this pond... by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    That life did not evolve in this pond but adapted from elsewhere is even more remarkable. On Titan natives wouldn't exactly be hardy adapted 'extremeophiles' anymore, any life would have evolved there, and be even more suited to it's environment.

    So that density of biomass could be greater, Titan could be a living soup planet. There's a small issue of temperature, if someone could please clarify, chemistry is going to work is a little different at -230 c compared to more than +100c, IANAC but chemical energy may not be available to life or happen at slower rates.?

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  18. The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by w0mprat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a quote from a tourist some time before the article:

    "Unlike a sterile and lifeless parking lot, you soon get a sense here that this lake is somehow alive. Roy said that a forty foot by forty foot hole completely fills itself in within 3 days."

    "The lake is constantly pulling things into itself, almost like a slow motion black hole. It's supposed to have "feelers" stretching outward for several miles, additional veins of pitch which stretch out from the main lake."

    "this photo of him peeling back the hardened skin of the lake."

    "The lake seemed to me more than anything to be like a large creature with no face, only arms and guts in which it slowly swallowed everything around it."

    "If it swallows some things, then it also spits others out"

    "Here is some leaf litter from part of the forest floor which the lake swallowed, chewed around for a few years and then spat out as indigestible. These leaves were in perfect condition, but as dry as it's possible to imagine."

    So it seems to be a living entity, demonstrably fussy, finding it a hard time getting a decent meal and likely depressed.

    http://www.richard-seaman.com/Travel/TrinidadAndTobago/Trinidad/PitchLake/

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Funny

      So it seems to be a living entity, demonstrably fussy, finding it a hard time getting a decent meal and likely depressed.

      Hmmm... In that case, I wonder what its /. UID is?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds uncomfortably close to the living ocean on Lem's Solaris. Did he report strange visions of his dead wife or something like that?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    3. Re:The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      "this photo of him peeling back the hardened skin of the lake." "The lake seemed to me more than anything to be like a large creature with no face, only arms and guts in which it slowly swallowed everything around it." "If it swallows some things, then it also spits others out"

      Hey, somebody warm Denise Crosby not to visit this lake. We might still avert that misfortune!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      It's sad that the people who shed it off to ascend to an energy level aren't around any more. Don't send Marina Sirtis or Denise Crosby to Trinidad!

    5. Re:The lake *is* alive and it's not happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a quote from a tourist some time before the article:

      "Unlike a sterile and lifeless parking lot, you soon get a sense here that this lake is somehow alive.
      Roy said that a forty foot by forty foot hole completely fills itself in within 3 days."

      "The lake is constantly pulling things into itself, almost like a slow motion black hole.
      It's supposed to have "feelers" stretching outward for several miles, additional veins of pitch which stretch out from the main lake."

      "this photo of him peeling back the hardened skin of the lake."

      "The lake seemed to me more than anything to be like a large creature with no face, only arms and guts in which it slowly swallowed everything around it."

      "If it swallows some things, then it also spits others out"

      "Here is some leaf litter from part of the forest floor which the lake swallowed, chewed around for a few years and then spat out as indigestible.
      These leaves were in perfect condition, but as dry as it's possible to imagine."

      So it seems to be a living entity, demonstrably fussy, finding it a hard time getting a decent meal and likely depressed.

      http://www.richard-seaman.com/Travel/TrinidadAndTobago/Trinidad/PitchLake/

      Didn't Captain Kirk kick this lakes ass?

  19. life by f3r · · Score: 1

    I bet that in a thousand years from now we will consider life as anything having a)enough presence of nonequilibrium thermodynamics states, and b)the ability to perform universal computation (either classical or quantum, or maybe another yet undiscovered more general thing). This could include, as foreseen by Asimov, lakes of superconducting metals in remote planets. Will vegetarianism in the future include moral attitudes for superconducting helium inside high field magnets? Will we see an invasion of Earth by superconducting metal intelligent beings on a hunt-those-superconducting-torturers/bastards?

    Maybe in Pluto there is a colony of intelligent robots (which communicate through gravity waves, i.e. civilizations withouth a theory of quantum gravity wouldn't detect their communications) and they are waiting for our civilization to build enough autonomous electronic components, so that at a given point they will send a signal/virus, take control of all our electronic infracstructure and take on planet's control. The threats of civilization always come from possibilities that we weren't able to imagine.

    1. Re:life by DissociativeBehavior · · Score: 0

      Transformers movies are pure fiction you know

    2. Re:life by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Maybe in Pluto there is a colony of intelligent robots (which communicate through gravity waves, i.e. civilizations withouth a theory of quantum gravity wouldn't detect their communications) and they are waiting for our civilization to build enough autonomous electronic components, so that at a given point they will send a signal/virus, take control of all our electronic infracstructure and take on planet's control. The threats of civilization always come from possibilities that we weren't able to imagine.

      Actually the only life on Pluto is a lonely ship full of intelligent crab/lobster people, and they are more frightened of us, than we of them.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  20. Meteor hiking by DrYak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It still should be possible for life to emerge in a more "emergence-compatible" place like Earth (or some even suggest some comets, under specific circumstances), and then be carried to other planets by meteorites impacts, etc.

    Imagine a meteorite hitting Earth and ejecting a small amount of tar-growing Titan-compatible bacteria : with an enormous amount of luck, a few surviving spores could end up landing mostly intact on a Titan-like planet.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  21. Of course.... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    (extremophile evolved from life developed in mild, favorable environment) != (extremophile evolved in extreme environment)

    But it IS great news, and is at least 'proof of concept' as to the sustainability of life in extreme conditions, even if ultimately we discover that life needs a perfect little petri dish of conditions to get STARTED.

    --
    -Styopa
  22. oxygen by sznupi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Our (very) distant ancestors evolved and thrived in an enviroment without significant amounts of oxygen; heck, it was most likely a poison to them. But then a group dumping it in large amounts showed up, and the rest is history...

    Now, it even seems it's quite possible that, what was once a dangerous byproduct, enabled explosion of life later on.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:oxygen by LienRag · · Score: 0

      the rest is history...

      No, the rest is (mostly) pre-history!

  23. Re:Theological implications by telomerewhythere · · Score: 1

    Could you explain how the lake of fire and sulfur can be hell if it 'eats' hell? Revelation 20:14:
    "14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. "

  24. Old news by Parlett316 · · Score: 1

    We have all known there has been life on Titan since Iron Man #55.

  25. Re:Theological implications by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  26. The Pitch lake is not noxious and foul smelling by Gel214th · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is actually a tourist attraction.

    Countries such as Germany mandate that their roads, the famous Autobahn, must constitute a certain percentage of pitch from Trinidad. The Asphalt from the pitch lake is internationally acclaimed for its high percentage of asphalt resins and world renowned for its quality.It is also the world's largest and most consistent deposit of natural asphalt.

    It is used in New York's Kennedy and La Guardia airports,to line the George Washington Bridge,and as previously stated in the German Autobahn system to name a few.

    In the face of all this the cavalier and in some sense derogatory terminology used by the poster is both unfortunate and inaccurate. One suspects the author has never actually visited the Pitch Lake in Trinidad. It doesn't smell, it is not filled with noxious fumes. The area is quite pleasant and forested.

    The pitch lake represents a little understood and fascinating eco-system, and it's great that it is finally being researched. It is incredible when one imagines how much of our past can be found in its depths,claimed from the earth tens of thousands of years ago, resting somewhere within it.

    --
    -Gel214th
  27. Re:Theological implications by Silfax · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait wait wait. Just wait a second. Are you saying that Hell is in Trinidad and Tobago? I know of worse places that that.

    You must work at the same place I do? Is that you Bob?

  28. Or maybe the Horta from STTOS by wrencherd · · Score: 1

    If this is true: "respiring with metals", then it seems more like just a few evolutionary steps to the Hortaas in"Devil in the Dark" from the original series.

    (But then my understanding of the term "respiration" has probably been impoverished by watching too much sci-fi tv.)

  29. screw titan by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    harness these guys for toxic superfund site clean ups, oil spills, etc

    sprinkle a little of this dioxin-b-gone on the brownfields, and voila!: strip mall and mcmansion ready building lots

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  30. T.F.PDF by CowboyRobot · · Score: 1

    The numerous grammatical errors in the article make me suspicious. You can read the original research paper here: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1004/1004.2047.pdf It clarifies many points

    --
    every stain tells a story
  31. Caribbean island of Trinidad and Tobago by steveb3210 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Caribbean island of Trinidad and Tobago" There are two islands. Trinidad. and Tobago. And the country is Trinidad and Tobago. But its not just one island.

  32. Told you so. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Wanna know how you can recognize someone who thinks he is an expert, but isn’t?
    If he considers water or oxygen essential for life, that’s someone like that.
    Remember that life on earth also started out with neither. We’re basically built of, consuming and endlessly recycling the poop of earlier organisms... and luckily our own poop feeds them again. (This only does sound nasty to us humans.)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Told you so. by the+biologist · · Score: 1

      Oxygen, yes. Water, no.

      Water is one of those basic molecules put together by the simple chemistry found before life. How else do you end up with comets and Mars ice caps containing water ice?

    2. Re:Told you so. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where this notion that there was no water on Earth when life evolved comes from. It seems Earth was covered in liquid water from quite an early stage. There was no free oxygen, of course, but water? Lots of it.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Told you so. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert and won't pretend to be, but I've read books and it's obvious you aren't an expert, either. Life on earth started out without oxygen, but not without water.

      And we're not "consuming and endlessly recycling the poop of earlier organisms". Plants are made of water and sunshine. Many plants can grow in pure sand, and all animal life feeds on plant life either directly or indirectly (by eating animals that eat animals that eat animals that eat plants).

    4. Re:Told you so. by the+biologist · · Score: 1

      I like the phrase, "consuming and endlessly recycling the poop of earlier organisms".

      The O2 we need is essentially waste from earlier or concurrent organisms. "Consuming" does imply eating, however, so perhaps it should be trimmed to, "endlessly recycling the poop of earlier organisms".

  33. It's not that bad by yamfry · · Score: 1

    When I was a child we lived in Trinidad for a few years. The Pitch Lake isn't really as bad as the article makes it sound. It doesn't smell. You won't die from noxious fumes by going near it. You can even take tours and walk out into the lake if you want. There are some areas that are solid pitch and other areas that you will sink into and die if you try to walk on them. There are guides who know (hopefully!) where it is safe to walk. It's a pretty cool place to visit if you get the chance.

  34. Re:Theological implications by Pikoro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Larry? You read slashdot?!?

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  35. Of course it contains life! by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

    Have these people not heard of Thomas Gold? http://www.news.cornell.edu/chronicle/99/1.28.99/Gold-book.html

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
  36. Extraterrestial origins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our assumptions often block the more fantastic, but probable possibilities. There are more interesting probable events to think about than just "pure" evolution from dirt and water. Why could not humans be genetically engineered? It may sound improbable and fantastic at first, but if you go look into it, you will see there are actually pretty strong indications of this. What is blocking people to find this out, is actually their own conditionings and bias - which is severely detrimental to the scientific method actually. How can a true scientist dismiss -ANY- idea out of hand?

    Everyone assumes we weren't planted here in the first place, except for maybe die-hard Bible-thumpers. Where is the "missing link"? We have all the evolution up to apes, then a period of "missing link" where we can't find fossils and bones of our ancestors, then all of a sudden homo sapiens arrives, coincidentally sharing 99% of genes with apes, but being distinctly different also. We haven't really evolved much since. The last hundred of thousands of years we are basically the same as then, not more or less intelligent although societies have had different empasis on different knowledge and practicalities. Humans as they are today arrived on the scene 200,000 years ago. Neanderthals died out 25,000 years ago. Why didn't the neanderthals evolve and where did humans come from? 198,000 years is a long time of lost history, but it makes no sense there are no traces of us as we are today before that.. All of a sudden humans arrived on the scene, and posed a radical threat to all competing species.

    I'm afraid bias and prejudice is the reason science is today unable to investigate this properly. Bias will be an assumption that blocks your vision for what is possible, even when most probable..

    Who where the "Gods" and "Giants" in the ancient times, who could fly aircrafts (mentioned in Vedas "vimanas", flying -aircraft-, complete with pilot manuals!, bible - Esekiel 1:4-25, 3:12-15, Maya, Hopi-indian religion, Egyptian, Greek mythology, pretty much every farking religio/tradition out there?), and also bomb cities with missiles of great powers (mentioned in Vedas, Bible (Sodom & Gomorra)? Where did people get these fanciful ideas, before we had aircrafts and nukes? There are mentions of both heart and brain! transplants being done successfully in various traditions. Where did these simple people get all these advanced ideas from? Of course this was mixed with their own superstition and culture, but if you read the bible verses, or Vedas, it is pretty clear what is actually meant. We can understand today, because we are able to build similar vehicles and missiles ourselves.

    From Esekiel 1:4-25 (The Bible, New International Version). How can this be nothing other than a description of a manned aircraft landing with a pilot inside:

    "4 I looked, and I saw a windstorm coming out of the north—an immense cloud with flashing lightning and surrounded by brilliant light. The center of the fire looked like glowing metal, 5 and in the fire was what looked like four living creatures. In appearance their form was that of a man, 6 but each of them had four faces and four wings. 7 Their legs were straight; their feet were like those of a calf and gleamed like burnished bronze. 8 Under their wings on their four sides they had the hands of a man. All four of them had faces and wings, 9 and their wings touched one another. Each one went straight ahead; they did not turn as they moved.

    10 Their faces looked like this: Each of the four had the face of a man, and on the right side each had the face of a lion, and on the left the face of an ox; each also had the face of an eagle. 11 Such were their faces. Their wings were spread out upward; each had two wings, one touching the wing of another creature on either side, and two wings covering its body. 12 Each one went straight ahead. Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, without turning as they went. 13 The appearance of the living creatures was like burning co

  37. Asphalt Metal Breathing Horta-culturalist by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    "You could become a Horta-culturalist!" - A.L..

    "Was found to inhabit a naturally occurring asphalt lake!"

    Cool. We have [three naturally occurring] asphalt lakes, other than our highways and roads!

    "Metal Respiration."

    Very cool. It's a metal breathing based life form Jim!

    The Horta's ancestors! It must be! [:)]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil_in_the_Dark

    "You could beome a Horta-culturalist." - Alan L.

    YUM ASPHALT! [:)] Titanic discovery!

    Microbial Life in a Liquid Asphalt Desert
    http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2047

    PDF of paper.
    http://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.2047v1

    Go out and shovel the asphalt driveway!
    I can't, it got up and crawled away! [:)]

    I don't know why we ever hired a Horta to be our driveway anyway? Concrete would have been friendlier.
    Yeah, but the Horta purrs.
    Oh yeah, right.

  38. Missed importance by Ouka · · Score: 1

    Theorizing on interplanetary life is cool and all, but there is a vastly more important point of research here that has major implications to us a species - what role, if any, these bugs play in creating the oil deposits that fuel our civilization.

    As noted in the OP these are the same sort of bugs that are found deep in oil wells. These subterranean bugs have lead many a researcher to believe that perhaps fossil fuels aren't so fossil-ish afterall. Instead of being formed by decaying plant matter and the occasional dinosaur from eons past, a competing hypothesis purport sthat oil sludge is a byproduct of teaming underground microbe populations.

    The ability to observe and investigate these bugs in a natural habitat at the surface of the planet in a place like Pitch Lake may shed light on the likelihood of an oil-shortage catastrophe that the fossil-fuel model predicts.

    1. Re:Missed importance by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > ...what role, if any, these bugs play in creating the oil deposits that fuel
      > our civilization.

      AFAIK they don't create oil. They convert it to tar.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  39. Re:What's the temperature Kelvin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the temperature, Kelvin?

  40. no pics of organisms by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    I was hoping to see photos of the organisms found. Sadly, from my quick skim of the pdf report, it appears they just did an RNA survey from various places in the lake and reported on the various amounts and types of genome sequences at various temperatures (This is how they determined the organisms were bacteria and archea). So unfortunately, no photos of the organisms.