Slashdot Mirror


How Do I Fight Russian Site Cloners?

An anonymous reader writes "I used to run a small web design service, the domain for which I allowed to expire after years of non-use. A few weeks ago, I noticed that my old site was back online at the old domain. The site-cloners are now using my old email addresses to gain access to old third-party web services accounts (invoicing tools, etc.) and are fraudulently billing my clients for years of services. I've contacted the Russian site host, PayPal, and the invoicing service. What more can I do? Can I fight back?"

208 comments

  1. contact your clients by Pinhedd · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you have a summary of your clients (and you should) you should send out a mass email and let them know what's going on

    1. Re:contact your clients by Cassini2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check that the problem is not closer to home. The problem could be either technical like a corrupt ISP or some spyware, or it could be an insider running the scam.

      To make this scam work, the third party needs a great deal of inside information. That points to an insider. For instance, the third party would need access to invoicing forms to make everything look official.

    2. Re:contact your clients by sopssa · · Score: 5, Funny

      The money has to get to these people somehow. Follow it, and you find the crook.

      Exactly, good advice!

      Like girlintraining states, you only need to hack to the Visa merchant account to know what bank account it belongs to, then hack the bank to know who is the owner of that account and get his bank statements to know what is being done with it. After you furiously raid the persons home you discover the old lady is a money mule and has wired the money overseas. Now you only need to take a flight to Kazakhstan and go talk with the local banks about it, just to find out that some alcoholic cashed it out for $10 and gave it to some man he doesn't remember.

      As always, great tip, girlintraining.

    3. Re:contact your clients by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I didn't immediately think "insider" but now you mention it... it makes total sense of a very unbelievable story.

      Oh well yet another story that doesn't pass a reality check, and in good kdawson fashion no supporting links or so. Here we go:

      The fraudsters copied the web site (that was presumably off-line for a long time). Trivial if it is all static pages, not trivial to impossible if it includes a lot of server-side scripting and you do not have access to the server directly. And quite unlikely that a web site is copied and kept archived by would-be fraudsters hoping that in the future the owner lets the domain expire so they can bring it back on-line? No. It just doesn't happen.

      Then they need to know which third-party services you used. And that you were so trusting that you use a third-party web service for invoicing in the first place.

      Then they know your clients (potentially through the third-party invoice service).

      Then they have your passwords (I may assume password protection).

      And how come your old accounts at those invoicing services are still accessible in the first place? From the fact that you let your domain expire after "years of non-use" I take it your business has closed years ago too. Third-party web services usually require payment, especially specialised stuff like invoicing. Not likely they keep that active without it being paid for.

      So Russian hackers? No. Insider job? That's where you should look first indeed. Start with former employees I'd say.

    4. Re:contact your clients by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      And explain to them how email is not a way to do business on the web if they are not cryptographically signed. Sorry, I may sound like an asshole, but this is a flaw in the email protocol that everyone accepts and deals with. This is the kind of things that will more and more happen until people ask for something more robust.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:contact your clients by omnichad · · Score: 2, Funny

      archive.org - just has to look alike, doesn't have to act alike

      password resets via email, though PayPal is quite a stretch.

      You seem to make good points on the rest.

    6. Re:contact your clients by ottothecow · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I am not sure they would have to replicate the pages exactly. Just take whatever shows up on archive.org and and slap a current date on it.

      The cloners are not trying to recreate your business--they just have to make it look like the business still has an active website. Then they use the emails that they now control to get back into old accounts.

      As for knowing which third-party services were used, there may be some indication on the archived site or there may be something available with enough googling--maybe they find a former client from a "site design by..." tag and social engineer some answers out of them (they don't have to be an insider or client themselves...they just use your old email address and ask a former client). There can't be that many providers of some of these services that were active when the business was running and are still active now...just start using lost password forms.

      They might have to reinstate your old payments, but a few months of invoicing service is a drop in the bucket compared to what they could then invoice your clients for (and bigger corporate customers might not ask questions before cutting a check to a company already in the system).

      --
      Bottles.
    7. Re:contact your clients by Quantumplation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They did it on CSI...

    8. Re:contact your clients by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you forgot another one...

      He also needs to take a baseball bat and beat himself in the head. Leaving LIVE billing accounts anywhere is pure stupid. you CLOSE those accounts when you close up shop. Even pay-pal will allow you to close up shop and shut down an account.

      That's just criminally sloppy.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:contact your clients by Pinhedd · · Score: 1

      To make this work effectively all an attacker would need would be the domain name. Replicating the site itself would be fairly easy and once they grab the domain they can also grab the email address, this wont include the original contents but it will match the address on file for many services. If this email address is tied to your third party services all they need to do is send out a password reset and neglecting any security questions they'll have access to all your stuff.

    10. Re:contact your clients by mikael · · Score: 3, Informative

      You would just have to send an "oops, I've forgotten my passpord" to the third-party service. With any such service, they will always send out regular circulars and notifications to whatever E-mail accounts are registered with them.

      So all a web-site cloner has to do, is find a defunct web-page that is no-longer in use, get hold of the E-mail address, and wait to see what arrives. Maybe they got hold of an old server with disk drives that weren't erased properly.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:contact your clients by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with this is that the scammers can send just out another mail calling him the scammer and 'reassuring' the customers that everything is okay and keep the money flowing. Who are they going to believe, originalguy@gmail.com or admin@originaldomain.com?

      He needs some way of proving who he is. He may have to resort to calling each customer directly to convince them, perhaps by referencing details of their relationship and past transactions that the scammers shouldn't know.

    12. Re:contact your clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The money has to get to these people somehow. Follow it, and you find the crook.

      Exactly, good advice!

      Like girlintraining states, you only need to hack to the Visa merchant account to know what bank account it belongs to, then hack the bank to know who is the owner of that account and get his bank statements to know what is being done with it. After you furiously raid the persons home you discover the old lady is a money mule and has wired the money overseas. Now you only need to take a flight to Kazakhstan and go talk with the local banks about it, just to find out that some alcoholic cashed it out for $10 and gave it to some man he doesn't remember.

      As always, great tip, girlintraining.

      Watergate Advice - follow the money...

    13. Re:contact your clients by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Corollary: Attach a dollar bill to a conveyor line, build that line to go around the block and turn the motor on, watch investigators jog around the block.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:contact your clients by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and have them contact their bank if any of them paid and start the process of following up on where the money went.

      I'm assuming they are contacting their local police. And sharing info. If this is what it looks like, it becomes international eventually, and getting back to the perps would be nice. Unrealistic, perhaps, but nice.

      What a scam. sheesh.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    15. Re:contact your clients by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what are you talking about?

      His clients aren't going to the site, the cloners are using the access to third party information obtained through the sites email fraudulently bill them. When old clients (some might not be any more) all of the sudden see themselves being billed for years of service that they never recieved/paid for or got, who do you think they are going to believe?

      Someone telling them there is a scam going on, which would explain the behavior?
      Or someone telling them ignore him, everything is fine we are just billing you for no real reason?

      What happens when they pick up the phone to follow up with a complain?

      He doesn't need a way to prove who is to the customers, he has proof that he paid for the site domain originally and needs to contact the third party service providers to get that account cut off and redirected to him

      Shame on you for not updating contact information when you let the domain expire. forget the open customer accounts within your 'profile' I'd be willing to bet that all of the transactions and everything else are tied to an account of his OWN with the 3rd parties, and various bad bits of information that have now been stolen the biggest problem is that the third party services are treating the activity as legit.

      --
      "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
      EdelFactor
    16. Re:contact your clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As always, great tip, girlintraining.

      Yeah, she's a real nutter, one of the few slashdot ID's I can remember for batshittyness.

    17. Re:contact your clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree with this. There's probably not much you can do.

      But you could fight it from a legal service perspective if you have the means to do so. If a company fraudulently represented themselves as your company and started billing your old clients even though no service was performed, it's definitely a battle that can be done legally. Plus it would probably clean up some of that trash (fraudsters) along the way.

    18. Re:contact your clients by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      Or it may just be a black hat wannabe that isn't really part of the Russian mafia.

      As always, great tip, girlintraining.

      You know her that well or you just wish you did?

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    19. Re:contact your clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't even need to get hold of the specific email address. If they own the domain now, they can set a catch-all email and see what addresses you're using with what services.

    20. Re:contact your clients by Pinhedd · · Score: 1

      that would only work for periodic inbound messages. I don't routinely receive emails from pay pal so unless someone knew the exact email I use they wouldn't be able to recover it.

    21. Re:contact your clients by teg · · Score: 1

      (and bigger corporate customers might not ask questions before cutting a check to a company already in the system).

      Bigger companies would have routines in place that would make this very hard... if you send an invoice, they'd better have a current PO number (or equivalent) or they'd be out of luck. Big companies have routines, and dedicated people to carry them out. This wouldn't be the first scam they'd see...

      A better target would be a small company, with just enough people that not everyone knows everything that happens, but too small to actually have rigid routines on everything.

    22. Re:contact your clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was it previously done? By snail mail. Were they cryptographically signed? No, they were just signed - about as secure as email.

    23. Re:contact your clients by sorak · · Score: 1

      I have an idea. Email an MP3 version of Metallica's "St Anger" to them, and let the RIAA do it for you.

    24. Re:contact your clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's not really correct. I think it would go more like this:

      Like girlintraining states, you only need to subpoena the Visa merchant account to know what bank account it belongs to, then subpoena the bank to know who is the owner of that account and get his bank statements to know what is being done with it. After the police lazily raid the persons home you discover the old lady is a money mule and has wired the money overseas. Now you only need to take a flight to Kazakhstan and go talk with the local banks about it, just to find out that some alcoholic cashed it out for $10 and gave it to some man he doesn't remember.

      But the end result is exactly the same.

    25. Re:contact your clients by onyxruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The principal of what girlintraining said stands, if you want to solve the problem you have to follow the money. The fact that this would likely require international police cooperation to resolve is moot. Police agencies work together on this kind of crime on a routine basis, it's just a question of where the jurisdiction falls.

      I used to work large balance fraud for a living, I could research a case, find the victim, find the perp, find all the aliases and their addresses, determine what was real, gain collaborating evidence from other fraud victim companies and be on the phone with the secret service with everything they needed to prosecute the case - and I typically did all of this in less than 15 minutes. While your chain of events isn't that far off, remember that for the people that solve this type of crime, it's what they do every single day.

      For example many scams like this used to be initiated in Romania, and then Romanian authorities started cooperating with outside police agencies. It's a bit of a game of a whack-a-mole, as scam artists pick different host countries. All that being said, there's no voodoo in solving this type of crime, the only voodoo is working through jurisdictional issues.

      The thing this person needs to do is report the crimes to the appropriate police agencies for their jurisdiction. They can then forward a copy of their police report to their former clients in an attempt to save their reputation. You gain points for trolling, but lose them for hyperbole.

    26. Re:contact your clients by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Bigger companies would have routines in place that would make this very hard... if you send an invoice, they'd better have a current PO number (or equivalent) or they'd be out of luck. Big companies have routines, and dedicated people to carry them out. This wouldn't be the first scam they'd see...

      In my experience, "big companies" have lots of people working for them, doing jobs that they don't understand the importance of. Many of these people simply follow the routine without understanding the point of it. As such most of them will cheerfully help you with and what you need to do to meet their process. As such, "big companies" tend to be very easy prey for these sorts of shenanigans. Where I work, we pay a 75 year old retired contractor $470 / hour to maintain one of our legacy systems. (you read that right). This guy long ago made plain what his price was, and there isn't any other soul on earth who is "qualified" to handle the old system, so the morons I work for continue to pay the extortion when the system breaks (which thankfully is not often). The moral of the story, is that the process may be setup to prevent abuses, but no process will prevent any real amount of abuse. The only effective safeguard is having savvy employees, which, sadly, given the state of phishing in this world, just isn't in the cards.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    27. Re:contact your clients by centuren · · Score: 1

      If you have a summary of your clients (and you should) you should send out a mass email and let them know what's going on

      Talk to a lawyer, too. You sound pretty liable in all this, as it all sounds like it stems from business negligence / lack of due diligence. A domain name should not be the key to any third-party web services accounts, among other things.

    28. Re:contact your clients by mikael · · Score: 1

      If you list your E-mail as a registered to a personal domain name in some public forum, that is enough for someone to wait for that domain name to expire and take over. Once control of the domain and E-mail address is gained, anyone can search for that E-mail across all forums and then take over.

      I've tried killing off old E-mail accounts in the past. Redirect all friends and family to the new address, while attempting to kill off any subscription based E-mails that arrive. Some are fairly easy - just click on the "Unsubscribe" button at the buttom and it's done. Other sites transfer you to their "manage subscriptions" webpage. You can unselect mailings, but you can't "delete this account and all associated mail communication".

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    29. Re:contact your clients by jsmcdougall · · Score: 1
      Hi All,

      I'm the original poster! Sorry about the Anonymous Coward status, I got lazy and never thought the story would get picked up.

      The site is http://www.fruition.ws/

      It's an HTML and image clone of what was a PHP/MySQL site. (Notice that none of the forms function.) I figure Russian hackers because the nameservers point to ns1.firstvds.ru and ns2.firstvds.ru.

      It can't be an inside job because the company was a one-man show, and that was me.

      Here's how I figured it happened:

      1. I let the domain expire.

      2. The hackers register the domain.

      3. They put up a version of my old site (either form archive.org, or maybe something they saved earlier?)

      4. They did some Googling to find my old email addresses, and set up those accounts.

      5. They used those emails to request "forgotten" passwords from the major invoicing services that a one-man shop would use.

      6. Voila! They're in and invoicing my customers.

      Make sense? Can we Slashdot (from the comments) them and take down the site?

    30. Re:contact your clients by capnkr · · Score: 1

      7. Profit!!!

      (Heh. Sorry, but that one was just floating over the plate...)

      Sorry to 'hear' about your troubles, but I don't think you'll be able to talk this crowd into doing a voluntary DDOS of the site...

      Why not create a web page explaining all this, so that when you get a contact from an irate ex-customer, you can simply direct them there. I would imagine that any current customers affected are pleased with your service, and so a brief explanation to them in which they find you are not really billing them anything would be enough to smooth things over.

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    31. Re:contact your clients by Geminii · · Score: 1

      What happens when 1% of all clients of defunct businesses who are billed by the fraudsters turn out to be businesses where a junior trainee admin takes the bill, checks that yes, they have records saying they did business with that business name, and processes the payment?

      It doesn't matter if 99% of recipients spot the scam, or do some checking, or kick up a fuss about an obviously wrong invoice, or aren't using their old billing address, or anything else. All it needs is that 1% who aren't paying quite as much attention as they should be.

    32. Re:contact your clients by supssa · · Score: 1

      As always, your stupidity knows no bounds.

      --
      Hatin' on products I don't like and getting modded up talking about tech I totally don't understand like it was 2005!
    33. Re:contact your clients by EdelFactor19 · · Score: 1

      what happens when that 1% get bit is that the 1% gets bit, and potentially that junior whatever gets fired if he didn't investigate the charge sufficiently. No matter what you do there is going to be 1% who do something stupid. There is nothing you can be expected to do to prevent that other than make your best effort.

      That's like saying what about the 1% of people who see a charge on their credit card bill that they don't remember making, but see they've been there before and pay it. Ultimately you are responsible for identifying whether you should pay your bill or not.

      So all in all i'm not sure what your point is. I agree that 1% might get taken; but at some level if they don't detect they are being billed for something they shouldn't be who can?
          And of what significance is this to the op?

      All it needs is 1% for what?

      --
      "Jazz isn't dead, it just smells funny" ~Frank Zappa
      EdelFactor
    34. Re:contact your clients by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      also if he contacts and old customer and tells them they are being fraudulently billed, it's really up to them at that point to take action. if they can't take the time to investigate if they are actually receiving a service what they are being billed, that's up to them.

  2. A crazy Idea by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 0, Troll

    You sound like you've taken care of most of what you can... so...

    Get a bunch of hackers together and tell them to do their best to DDOS your old site!

    1. Re:A crazy Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a rather dangerous and almost certainly illegal thing to do.

      However, I was thinking about suggesting that he post the URL here so that people here in slashdot could take a look at the site and get some ideas about what to do about the ...
       
      ...oh, wait.

    2. Re:A crazy Idea by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Get a bunch of hackers together and tell them to do their best to DDOS your old site!

      I believe this kid is available.

    3. Re:A crazy Idea by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      You mean like, post the URL on Slashdot?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  3. There's only one thing you can do by FreeUser · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Take off and nuke 'em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."

    Oh wait, they're in post-soviet Russia...
    (Sirens wailing)
    That probably wasn't a very good--
    [NO CARRIER]

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:There's only one thing you can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Take off and nuke 'em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."

      I love that movie. "Game over man, game over!"

  4. Russian hosting by blackraven14250 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good thing your site is hosted in Russia. That makes things a whole lot easier.

  5. fight back by toxygen01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    check the dns domain registrar of theirs and report domain abuse.
    that's what whois information is about too.

    1. Re:fight back by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      check the dns domain registrar of theirs and report domain abuse.

      But it's not domain abuse. This guy says he let his domain expire. Someone else then registered it. No domain abuse involved.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:fight back by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

      Asking an honest question, but I would think that registering a domain to do illegal activities would constitute abuse?

      --
      Illiterate? Write for free help!
    3. Re:fight back by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      Asking an honest question, but I would think that registering a domain to do illegal activities would constitute abuse?

      I would agree, but that would require determining if the activities are illegal in the country or location of the domain owner. Just because such activities might be illegal in my country, your country, or the country of the submitter doesn't mean it's illegal in country of the current domain owner.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:fight back by Dumnezeu · · Score: 1

      So, because I'm in China and I "borrow" your American identity doesn't constitute any abuse? Not even if I talk to your clients and convince them that I am you and demand money from them and threaten them with legal hassle if they refuse to pay? Not even if I empty your bank accounts? These bastards are using the domain as key element in a their scam of using this poor guy's identity to defraud his old customers. Someone tries to explain it to you and you still think that is not clear evidence of abuse?

      What the fuck could possibly constitute "abuse" for you? We are now witnessing the birth of a new generation: the slashtards.

      --
      Yes, it's sarcasm. Deal with it!
    5. Re:fight back by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      Someone tries to explain it to you and you still think that is not clear evidence of abuse? What the fuck could possibly constitute "abuse" for you?

      You don't get it. It doesn't matter what you or I think. It matters what the law thinks. Our opinions on this matter mean absolutely nothing.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  6. Try to have the DNS entry removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You MIGHT be able to at least force their registrar to shut down their DNS registration, thus removing both the site and the email addresses from the web.
    I don't know how it works for fraudulent sites, but for Spam pointing at a clearly "spam-vertized" site I found this tool useful:
    http://spamtrackers.eu/wiki/index.php/Complainterator
    It helps you look up the responsible registrars for a domain and gives you their contact information, so you can ask them to remove their DNS entries.
    Not sure how likely they are to help, especially if the registrar is in Russia or China (I read some horror stories about the lack of cooperation from some registrars in those countries), but you never know...

    1. Re:Try to have the DNS entry removed by Archon-X · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a problem with these automated tools - and that is that they're the shotgun approach.

      We run some mainstream sites, and we also allow affiliate promotion.
      We have a zero-tolerance spam / mailing policy, but that doesn't stop people trying.

      If or when complaints come through (SpamCop, SpamHaus, etc) - we deal with them, and nuke the affiliates - we're just as anti-spam & fraud as the BL guys.

      The problem, however, is that with the use of this / these tools, when DNS, upstream and network providers are scatter-bombed with complaints, over, and over, you end up getting blacklisted. Even if you're not in the wrong, you get blacklisted.

      If you've ever been on the end of a SpamCop / SpamHaus complaint, as much as they may have intended to setup a good service, their 'service' is incredibly partial.

      For example, the latest email back from SH to our host, when we had banned a fraudulent affiliate:

      Let's talk about removing the customer instead of offering up yet another affiliate excuse.
      Regards,
      -- The Spamhaus Project (SR22) http://www.spamhaus.org/

      Their website 'evidence' archives are full of libel and blackmail - if you email SH with a fake complaint, and say that company X participates in money laundering, international fraud and spam - they'll publish it - without an ounce of fact checking.

      Somewhat off topic, but these issues burn - who watches the 'watchers' / internet 'police'

    2. Re:Try to have the DNS entry removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhat off topic, but these issues burn - who watches the 'watchers' / internet 'police'

      Ceiling cat.

    3. Re:Try to have the DNS entry removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhat off topic, but these issues burn - who watches the 'watchers' / internet 'police'

      Ceiling cat.

      I don't believe in Ceiling Cat. I made sure that god killed every kitten ever born.

    4. Re:Try to have the DNS entry removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhat off topic, but these issues burn - who watches the 'watchers' / internet 'police'

      Coastguard?

  7. More To It? by s7uar7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do they know which third-party web services you used to use, unless it's one of your old clients?

    1. Re:More To It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It probably wasn't difficult at all, really. I would guess that he signed up for all those services with a fairly generic e-mail address like mail@domain.com, companyname@domain.com, clients@domain.com, etc., which they've probably re-created. Once those addresses started getting e-mail from the third-party services, they were in.

    2. Re:More To It? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      How many services have a "lost your password? enter email address here". If you abandon a domain name you really must make sure that you change the registered email address of any service registered using it. Its easy to forget if you are used to just accessing the site with username and password.

    3. Re:More To It? by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Informative

      It probably wasn't even that hard. Once they own the domain, they can park a standard email server on it and capture email sent to the domain, they don't even need to implement the specific addresses.

    4. Re:More To It? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      And even if the addresses were a little unusual between looking at the old website on archive.org and watching which addresses still get spam in the mailserver logs it's probablly pretty easy to figure out what addresses used to be used on a domain.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:More To It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of his customers might be publicly identifiable if their web sites are carrying a badge linked to his web site.

    6. Re:More To It? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      It's even easier since you can set up a "catch all" inbox to catch any e-mails to the entire domain. At least cpanel lets you do this. I keep it off because it tends to catch mostly spam to randomly generated usernames@mydomain.

    7. Re:More To It? by patSPLAT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. take over domain
      2. setup catch all email account
      3. wait for "we wish you were still our customer" email
      4. take over old billing accounts
      5. repost site from archive.org
      6. start tracking down clients perhaps with search for 'site designed by xxxxxxx' and send bills

      It's a pretty smart scam.

    8. Re:More To It? by jsmcdougall · · Score: 1

      Hi there,

      I'm the original poster, now logged it. The site is http://www.fruition.ws/

      I thought it was a pretty clever scam as well. They didn't have to break into anything! I think you've explained exactly how they did it. At least, that's the same conclusion I came to.

    9. Re:More To It? by Dumnezeu · · Score: 1

      Yes, nothing seems to work besides the homepage. And even the :hover styles are broken.

      --
      Yes, it's sarcasm. Deal with it!
  8. Business Ratings Sites by lmnfrs · · Score: 1

    Find all the ratings and informational sites you can, and explain as prominently as possible what's happened. Show some evidence by explaining how to find the history of a domain's registration so people can see the ownership changed completely.

    I assume you've been in contact with previous clients to learn they're being billed, so tell them they can report false billings on that type of site.

  9. Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by Bourdain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wouldn't it just be cheaper/easier to just never let even remotely valuable/vulnerable domains expire since it costs so little to keep renewing them?

    1. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How very helpful.

    2. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by uglyduckling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes!! You've hit on the perfect answer. Hindsight and a time machine can solve any problem. Bravo!

    3. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by doubleu606 · · Score: 3, Funny

      network solutions sales rep, is that you?

    4. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by Bourdain · · Score: 4, Informative

      I completely appreciate your response -- my suggestion is clearly inappropriate in the poster's question but...

      Even though the poster claims this domain was not used, merely the ownership of it (at nominal cost might I add) protected his business which he only realized in retrospect. That, I believe is the take home to readers of this forum in this situation -- not what to do if you make this blunder.

      As little as a single lost sale as a result of this gaffe on the poster's part, could far exceed the cost of renewing the domain for a decade.

    5. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because only answers solely for the original poster should be accepted. Answers to help other people from having the same problem in the future should be avoided.

      In fact why do we bother posting to a public web site, just email your answers to the poster.

    6. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Your use of the word "nominal" reminds me of this. The word "nominal" always left a foul taste in my mouth; it's like asking someone to give "only" some recurring amount. Aggregate that over a half-dozen someone's, and that recurring amount stacks up.

      Let's say that the OP tries his hands at a few dozen businesses during his life. For every one of those domains, he's stuck with another recurring fee to manage. Even if the individual fee is low, it adds up.

      Actually, kinda reminds me of the crap I cleaned off my hard drive this afternoon; tiny files can still fill up a drive, if you have enough of them.

    7. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      See a moderation called "Offtopic"

      Also, if Bourdain's post wasn't directed at the OP, it should have started off with, "I don't know how to help you, but perhaps this should be a warning to..."

      As it was, it read in a rather condescending tone.

    8. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by Bourdain · · Score: 1

      I agree, small things, added together "add up". Even more strangely, large things "add up" faster. But the way to make such decisions is where one's judgment comes into play...

      This is ultimately a judgment call for an individual to make, i.e. if you feel the sum of the small things is larger than the expected value of the value of the "large" things, you can make your decision. In your example, by actually supplying numbers, let's say someone decides to hold onto 6 domains for 10 years when he feels they have limited value (i.e. only "protective" value). That would cost around 6 * 10 * 20 or around $1200 (likely even less when you factor in present value or a deal you'd get from the registrar). Compare that number to what you could lose if someone were to steal customers from you. If you feel that $1200 is a reasonable price to pay for protection, then I'd suggest paying it.

      Merely employing the cliche of "small things add up" is little more than a "FUD" approach.

    9. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You're asking people to take a lifelong tax in order to start a business which may or may not last longer than a quarter, and that tax is cumulative with each business they attempt. Consider that the length of one's life is unknown (if it were known, insurance companies would be all over the guy handing out the "knowing"), and that seems like an awful lot to ask. Even a 30-year mortgage has an end date. Your suggested solution would be murderous on serial entrepreneurs.

      Consider further that the email accounts and business records could live past the lifetime of the proprietor himself. That still leaves his former clients open to the same kind of fraud, particularly if the person/system rubber-stamping the payments isn't aware that the business that sent them the invoice no longer exists.

    10. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It's a public forum, responses that aren't exactly to the questioners situation are no Off Topic. They are why a public forum is better than asking people for private answers.

      Just because you read a tone doesn't mean the tone was there let alone intended to be there.

    11. Re:Don't let valuable/vulnerable domains expire? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Hey, I don't like it any better than you do. Take it up with Taco.

      However, I think we've drifted offtopic...

  10. Would contacting ICANN help? by areusche · · Score: 1

    From readings on here, I've discovered that for a couple thousand dollars ICANN can take domain names from squatters and pass them off to you. Granted if it was some other business who wanted the domain name I'd say don't worry, but this is a clear case of fraud. So would Icann be able to help in this matter?

  11. If TV Has taught me anything... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only way to deal with the Russians is with the Italians or the Irish.

    So either:

    "Say hello to my little friend"

    or

    "This guy takes a blunt object, fuckin', waah! Hits the guy with the bandages around his head, right? Why? 'Cause he's smart. He knows the guy with the bandages around his ass, he ain't goin' nowhere. He's goin' fuckin' nowhere. "

    1. Re:If TV Has taught me anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Where you going? Nowhere!"

    2. Re:If TV Has taught me anything... by AtomicOrange · · Score: 0

      Not to be a pain in the ass, but "Say hello to my little friend" Was Tony Montana - Cuban. So would Cuban/Mexican drug cartels work?

      --
      "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
    3. Re:If TV Has taught me anything... by allcaps · · Score: 1

      "When are you going? Fast!"

    4. Re:If TV Has taught me anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scarface was Cuban. Thanks for defaming Italians.

    5. Re:If TV Has taught me anything... by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forget the Italians, they know the rule: Never fight a land war in Asia.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:If TV Has taught me anything... by moranar · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Say hello to my little friend" was Cuban.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    7. Re:If TV Has taught me anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greenley, I think I'm going to want a bagel with my coffee...

  12. Copyright Violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not go after them for copyright infringement?

  13. Contact the FBI by Orga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I assume this is a form of wire fraud, international at that.

    1. Re:Contact the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      might as well contact James Bond directly.

  14. Not many options, but to ease your conscience... by HikingStick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To ease your conscience, pull together your old contact list and let your former clients know that you've not been running the business (or charging for services) for years. Advise them of the current scam, and hope they get your message before they pay the bad guys.

    While I have your attention, shame on you for letting your business go dark without tying up the loose ends (e.g., informing your customers). I feel for your customers.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  15. Based on my understanding... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of how Russian Free Enterprise works, I would suggest either hiring hitmen to brazenly gun-down whoever cloned your site, if it is a relatively small operation, or insinuate that the cloner is an enemy of the state, and have him jailed on trumped-up tax evasion charges, if it is a large operation.

    If neither of these options suits, I hear that Polonium is the new Earl Grey...

    1. Re:Based on my understanding... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      You have a problem with the 'large operation' step there. No tax evasion charge will be laid if the operation in question does not do one of the following: 1. Threatens the current power in the country politically. 2. Does not play ball with one or more official representative of the current administration by sharing the wealth. It only takes one of the above two conditions in order for a company to be brought on tax evasion charges.

      By the way, what is interesting is that what is normally defined as 'tax avoidance' or 'tax optimization' (any legal ways to minimize taxes) is considered tax evasion there. That means that any corporations or private person can be brought up on tax evasion charges when needed.

  16. See if you can negotiate a cut if you help them? by enaso1970 · · Score: 1

    You should know some inside intelligence in dealing with your clients? Seriously: 1) Contact anyone you did any business through the site and explain the situation to them. 2) Contact their DNS registrar and complain 3) If they have an SSL cert - contact the issuing authority and complain 4) Buy a zombie army (computers or people) and attack!

  17. Phishing filters by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just an off-the-wall idea here, but check to see how to report this site to Mozilla and Microsoft to get it into their blacklist of phishing/scam sites. If I got something from a site, and, upon trying to visit it, my browser's filter warned me about it, I might suspect something fishy is going on.

    Doing this is by no means a complete solution, but it could get you part of the way there.

  18. hmm by nomadic · · Score: 1

    File a UDRP complaint and get the domain name back. Won't fix matters, they'll still have access to your customers it sounds like but at least it will help.

  19. Nuke the cloners from orbit by Daimanta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    it's the only way to be sure

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  20. ICANN by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution. It is often overturned in court, and isn't always effective, but taking back control of the domain in whatever way possible is more than likely the only way you will fully recover from this. Otherwise you are simply on a damage mitigation mission.

    --
    "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
    1. Re:ICANN by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the problem I see with this though is it's not like the domain was stolen. He allowed it to lapse while having email addresses on that domain still recognized by clients. They legally registered it, and are now making life hard for him. He screwed up, and can't go running to the authorities for that alone. Now clearly they're being fraudulent WITH the domain, but they obtained it legally, so that makes it a lot harder to legally take away.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:ICANN by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Excellent idea! If you file the claim, the scammers have to file a reply, or they lose by default. Since people like this are bottom feeders who move from one scam to another, I seriously doubt they'll want to expose themselves by filing a response. Like cockroaches exposed to a light, they'll scurry away.

    3. Re:ICANN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or......sell the rights to your former domain to the Chinese. That should take care of the Russian site cloners fairly effectively. As for the Chinese site cloners, well.......you have my sympathies.

    4. Re:ICANN by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Additionally, it doesn't sound like he even wants the domain back. He just wants people to stop using it to impersonate him.

      Suppose I own a domain, and want to stop using it. No big deal - I let it lapse. I don't want to pay for it - I don't need it. However, if somebody were to register it expressly for the purpose of impersonating me, I'd certainly care about it!

      The same thing can happen offline. Suppose I buy a home and phone number that used to be owned by Bill Gates simply so that I can impersonate him and clean out his bank accounts or whatever. Should Bill Gates need to dispute my purchase of the home? That isn't what is at issue.

      The problem is fraud, not domain ownership in this case.

      The real solution is to not tie identity to a domain. Sure, you can deliver based on a domain, but emails should be encrypted to a certificate, and signed by a certificate, and identity should be based on that.

      For whatever reason it seems like we live in this fantasyland where security and authentication is an afterthought in almost all internet protocols...

    5. Re:ICANN by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are committing fraud.

      If you sell your house, and I move in, that does not mean that I can legitimately use your credit card just because I have your mailing address.

    6. Re:ICANN by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not the case. Someone who legally obtains a domain name may be forced to surrender it if they use it to trade on the goodwill on another or if there is no valid reason for using that domain. Like if I bought applecomputers.com and sold laptops on it, Apple will almost certainly win a UDRP proceeding against me. If he can prove that clients are being scammed and the scammers are using the site to pretend to be him (and trade on his reputation) he would have a good case.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    7. Re:ICANN by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 1

      The problem is that yes, they are committing fraud, but since they are in Russia he has effectively nothing that he can do with regards to it. His only option is to find an alternative way to take control back, like I said, the best option being to somehow get the domain back. If they were doing this from the US, it would be much more simple.

      --
      "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
    8. Re:ICANN by bazorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if that's insightful or scary. so you are saying that once you have been victim of identity fraud, you can't do anything to stop it from continuing?

    9. Re:ICANN by dissy · · Score: 4, Informative

      the problem I see with this though is it's not like the domain was stolen ... Now clearly they're being fraudulent WITH the domain, but they obtained it legally, so that makes it a lot harder to legally take away.

      You should read the ICANN domain agreement you clicked OK to when registering a domain (All registrars for .com are required to pass that agreement on)

      Registering a domain name in bad faith, and/or for the use of fraud, is grounds for domain revocation.

      Being legally purchased, and not being stolen, do not factor into ICANNs rules. Those are more legal issues a court would need to address, and only after that happens would it be ICANNs concern.

      ICANN can revoke any .com domain on the grounds it is registered in bad faith or used for fraud.
      They HAVE done this in the past too.

      If you register a domain that sounds similar to an existing business, and also use that website for business, odds are good they can have it revoked from you. If your business line is the same as the existing business, it is guaranteed to be revoked. Being local rules, that the end user agreed to, there is little recourse when ICANN chose to do so, even if they do abuse this vague rule.

      http://www.icann.org/en/dndr/udrp/policy.htm

      Section 4, subsection A, paragraph III

      4. Mandatory Administrative Proceeding.

      This Paragraph sets forth the type of disputes for which you are required to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding. These proceedings will be conducted before one of the administrative-dispute-resolution service providers listed at www.icann.org/udrp/approved-providers.htm (each, a "Provider").

              a. Applicable Disputes. You are required to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding in the event that a third party (a "complainant") asserts to the applicable Provider, in compliance with the Rules of Procedure, that

                      (i) your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and

                      (ii) you have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and

                      (iii) your domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

    10. Re:ICANN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't the US have some sort of Cybercrime bureau where such activities can be reported to? FBI,, DHS, or other....

      I believe this might qualify if they are targeting US based entities and are attempted to defraud them.

    11. Re:ICANN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you do have the right to establish your business in that same address, selling the exact same thing the former owner sold.

    12. Re:ICANN by blair1q · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct. Legally, he's not the one with a complaint. It's his old customers who are being defrauded. This is neither his fault nor his fight.

    13. Re:ICANN by blair1q · · Score: 1

      So the solution is simple. Call up Jon Pos---er, ICANN, and report the fraud.

      Contact the former customers of the website and have any who've been hit-up for fake billings report it as well.

      Much simpler than the Jack Bauer defense.

    14. Re:ICANN by laing · · Score: 1

      ICANN has no power of its own. Good luck getting them to do anything for you. Pretty much every domain registrar does something to violate ICANN's terms. As an example, try letting a 3 letter dot com domain expire and see how long it takes to come up for open registration... Don't hold your breath!

    15. Re:ICANN by dissy · · Score: 1

      ICANN has no power of its own. Good luck getting them to do anything for you.

      First two hits on google:

      ICANN revoking a persons domains:
          http://goldsteinreport.com/article.php?article=6371
          ICANN Terminates EstDomains for CEO's Fraud Convictions

      And ICANN putting the smackdown on an entire registrar:
          http://aliasencore.com/p404/parava-networks-registrar-accreditation-revoked.html
          Parava Networks Registrar Accreditation Revoked

      Plenty more examples. If actually revoking domains means powerless to revoke domains, then their powerless state is mighty powerful!

      I have personally even gotten them to revoke a domain from someone else, who had the .com form of what I had .net, org, and .ca in use for. The .com was a clear auction page for the domain starting at a few thousand dollars, and an email to ICANN pointing it out and two weeks time got it unregistered. A day later it was registered in my name, and after a week (To avoid wasting my time in case the squatter wanted to contest) it was live with the other domains on the web server.

      Granted I don't think I could hold my breath for two weeks plus :P
      but that's still a far cry better from not doing anything for me as you imply.

    16. Re:ICANN by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes but that also does not mean I can have someone kick you out of your the house you legally moved into. Unless you're heading to jail which is the only alternative in this case too. The issue here never was what was legally bought, it's just pure and simple identity theft combined with fraud.

  21. Close your accounts! by iamapizza · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why didn't you close your third party accounts when you were shutting down your old site?

    --
    Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    1. Re:Close your accounts! by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many sites do not allow accounts to be closed. Try to close your Slashdot account, for example.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Close your accounts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It worked!

    3. Re:Close your accounts! by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try to close your Slashdot account, for example.

      Bastard. now I've got to re-register.

    4. Re:Close your accounts! by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      ...and now I've registered with your old username and will extort all your old friends for karma.

    5. Re:Close your accounts! by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Some swine managed to grab my old /. account 'Anonymous Coward' and now posts over and over again using it - Grrr.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    6. Re:Close your accounts! by malevo · · Score: 2, Funny

      This would be funny if you posted as an Anonymous Coward.

  22. Didn't you notice? by leighjam · · Score: 1, Informative
    How come you didn't notice your website and email were down?

    I used to work at a registrar and it's not like one day you wake up and BOOM the domain is gone. All give warnings weeks if not months ahead of time. Most give a couple days of leeway before turning off the domain. After they turn it off (i.e. no email, web or anything can use the domain) you have about 30 days before it goes into redemption, once in redemption it's a crap shoot if you can get it back but you still can.

    If it was your business, then the domain is a valuable asset and should be treated as such. Much like a brick and mortar office. If you don't pay the rent, leave valuable customer information in file cabinets and are kicked out (after getting an eviction notice), don't complain if someone comes in and uses the space for a crack den and the customer info for their own nefarious purposes.

    A few recommendations,

    • Use a reliable third party email account(i.e. yahoo, msn,gmail) for your contact info and NOT the domain in question
    • Make sure you check it all the time!!!!
    • Don't think your registrar is ALWAYS spamming you.
    • Renew domains for Christmas or another holiday, if you renew early the time just gets tacked on the end you don't looks anything
    • Renew domains for multiple years
    1. Re:Didn't you notice? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      And what happens when you close your business?

      Maybe he doesn't want that domain any longer. Why should he have to pay for it forever just so that nobody else uses it?

      And what will DNS look like in 100 years when 95% of all domain names belong to companies that no longer exist but refuse to let anybody recycle it?

    2. Re:Didn't you notice? by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Funny

      > A few recommendations...

      a) Read the article.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Didn't you notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      b) what article? c) ..... d) profit!

    4. Re:Didn't you notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come you didn't notice your website and email were down?

      From TFS (emphasis added):

      I used to run a small web design service, the domain for which I allowed to expire after years of non-use.

      Any questions?

    5. Re:Didn't you notice? by Bourdain · · Score: 1

      was there an article besides the several line initial post?

    6. Re:Didn't you notice? by Keruo · · Score: 1

      > And what will DNS look like in 100 years when 95% of all domain names belong to companies that no longer exist but refuse to let anybody recycle it?

      This is almost what I'm facing with one domain. It was previously used by another company during IT-bubble.

      That company has been defunct for 15 years, and the domain expired.
      The domain was grabbed by a company specializing in reselling domains, and they are asking 100x more than I'm willing to pay for the domain.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    7. Re:Didn't you notice? by qoncept · · Score: 1

      If you don't pay the rent, leave valuable customer information in file cabinets and are kicked out (after getting an eviction notice), don't complain if someone comes in and uses the space for a crack den and the customer info for their own nefarious purposes.

      I'll assume by "don't complain" what you actually meant was "do something about." (You know, since the OP wasn't "complaining", he was asking what to "do about.")

      Now, you expect him to, what, just ignore this and let the havoc wreak? If you're a stupid 18 year old and end up with 20k in credit card debt, do you just move on and keep letting the penalties pile up? Probably, but that's obviously not what you should do.

      --
      Whale
    8. Re:Didn't you notice? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      And what will DNS look like in 100 years when 95% of all domain names belong to companies that no longer exist but refuse to let anybody recycle it?

      Yah! How are Russians scammers supposed to make money, then!?

    9. Re:Didn't you notice? by dissy · · Score: 1

      Read the article.

      My bad. Something must be going on with my computer, as two different browsers show no links to any articles in this story summary.

      But you got modded +5 insightful, so you and others are clearly seeing links.

      Could you do me a huge favor and paste them in reply?
      Thanks!

    10. Re:Didn't you notice? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      How come you didn't...

      ... read the first sentence of the summary?

  23. Trace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Create a GUI interface using Visual Basic to track their IP address.

    Done.

    1. Re:Trace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran out of mod points, I think what was posted above is funny as hell! Mod it up!

    2. Re:Trace? by CreamyG31337 · · Score: 1

      That only works on a KILLER's ip address. I have this one written in visual cobol, but I haven't been able to figure out what country uses the 359.x ip address range yet.

    3. Re:Trace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonus points for a spinning atom or matrix-style animation.

  24. Re:ok, so you abandoned it and your customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Insightful? The new site owners are scamming his old customers by billing FRAUDULENTLY. If this were just them doing more work maybe the above post would not be a troll.

  25. Form an Empire... by DarthVain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and ally yourself with a "Trade Federation".... then use hordes of mechanical robots to fight a "Clone War".

    You might not win, but some asshole may make a few shitty movies about it anyway...

  26. Obligatory by Wowlapalooza · · Score: 1

    Clones are people two.

    In (non-)Soviet Russia, sites clone YOU

  27. Re:ok, so you abandoned it and your customers by spydabyte · · Score: 1

    agreed. it sounds like to me that he stopped working on a website, stopped offering a service, and let everything expired. That leaves a great business plan for someone to start where you left off. If the people are paying for a service they aren't receiving, that's their fault. If the Russian "cloners" are actually providing the same service you did, then good for the Russians.

    The only other issue I can see here is copyright / stolen corporate identity, which if you don't know what to do already (contact a lawyer and file an international law suit?) then there's nothing you can do.

  28. How did they get ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... the client account data? I should think that the answer to that question would define your options for legal recourse. Ultimately, liability may befall your former ISP, the usurpers, or yourself, depending on that answer.

  29. Always use a perm email by Bruha · · Score: 1

    It's not good practice to use your domain email as a email for any domain registered tools. If your domain was down for whatever reason you have no recourse to reset any passwords etc, and as we can see this issue can crop up.

    Unfortunately for the OP and I hope that his former customers would understand, he could be held liable, but I hope those impacted will just take it on the chin.

    1. Re:Always use a perm email by Chad+Birch · · Score: 1

      Where exactly do you get one of these "perm emails" that aren't tied to any sort of service that might go down or disappear in the future?

      --
      Sturgeon was an optimist.
    2. Re:Always use a perm email by Raffaello · · Score: 1

      Ironically, me.com, formerly mac.com. (ironic because when the service first started Apple were generally considered to be going out of business any day now).

    3. Re:Always use a perm email by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      How is that permanent? Apple could decide to stop providing it "any minute now". Even if they weren't, it's a subscription service (and bloody expensive one at that).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  30. Re:Not many options, but to ease your conscience.. by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    While I have your attention, shame on you for letting your business go dark without tying up the loose ends (e.g., informing your customers). I feel for your customers.

    Bingo! The OP deserves every heartache he gets for leaving his old business in such a state. I hope he does get sued and serves as a lesson to others.

  31. Fight Back by topcoder · · Score: 1

    Give them nothing, but take from them everything!!!

  32. Re:Not many options, but to ease your conscience.. by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    While I have your attention, shame on you for letting your business go dark without tying up the loose ends (e.g., informing your customers).

    Who's to say he didn't? He could very well have tied up loose ends, but that doesn't stop the scammers from invoicing the former customers anyway.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  33. helpful indeed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "help, I left a hundred dollars sitting on the restaurant table yesterday, how can I force the restaurant to give it back?"

  34. This one is too easy... by thepike · · Score: 1

    In mother Russia, site clones you.

    1. Re:This one is too easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, yet you screwed it up. It's SOVIET Russia.

  35. Re:Dear Anonymous Coward by allcaps · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is there a Doctor House in the?

  36. Re:talk to a lawyer by Skreems · · Score: 1

    How the hell is this modded informative? The guy didn't leak any financial data. This is the equivalent of moving out of a leased storefront and the next tenant contact Visa and saying, "Hey, I'm still here, could you pretty please send me a copy of all the records again?" and them doing it just because the address is the same.

    --
    Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
    The Urban Hippie
  37. Pre-empt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would suggest a pre-emptive strike, but as you may know the Russkies have that big ass Doomsday Device, so please don't.

  38. Where is the soviet russian joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia websites clone YOU!

  39. Re:Russian hosting [Dancing with 3rd-World] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Good thing your site is hosted in Russia. That makes things a whole lot easier.

    Exactly! If you accept the benefits of cheap 3rd-world labor, you have to also be ready to accept the ugly downsides. In Soviet Russia, the cake eats you too.
           

  40. Similar happened to us by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    I was part of a LAN gaming group. It was pretty much dieing anyway since more and more people were getting broadband then. Anyhow, we lost contact with the guy that had the domain, so we were not able to renew it when it expired several years ago. A few months ago, I was going through some old bookmarks, and lo and behold, the site was up and running. The forums weren't functional as they were based on custom code that they didn't manage to get. Other than that, it looked the same. The new domain contact info resolved back to some Russian place. BTW, there was no commercial value to the site, but it was a cool blast from the past to see it up again.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Similar happened to us by Raffaello · · Score: 1

      The new domain contact info resolved back to some Russian place. BTW, there was no commercial value to the site.

      1. resurrect deceased domain
      2. drive-by malware
      3. profit!!!

      i.e., it may have had no commercial value when legitimately operated in the past, but it may well be a source of illegal revenue now.

  41. Slashdot the site by dmesg0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Publish the link to the site on Slashdot (and don't forget to mention it has some free pr0n). The site will die within minutes, after the first 10 million slashdotters visit it.

  42. A choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill them.

  43. Doesn't smell right... by ArundelCastle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The site-cloners are now using my old email addresses to gain access to old third-party web services accounts (invoicing tools, etc.) and are fraudulently billing my clients for years of services.

    Assuming your domain's e-mail has been bouncing for *years*, how in the hell did perfect strangers a world away(?) dig up your data? This sounds like something that happens after an unshredded trash rummage.
    1. How do they know what all your internal e-mail addresses were?
    2. How do they know what your web services were?
    3. How do they know who your clients were?
    4. How do your clients believe you're still doing work for them after years of silence?
    5. How are these web services still holding your account data after years of inactivity? Invoice tools ain't free.

    Hard to believe we're getting the whole story here. I think Ask Slashdot just got phished.

    1. Re:Doesn't smell right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. They don't need to know. They just need to point the MX to a catch-all mail server and receive all mail for the domain.
      2. Many web services send mail to former customers to inform them about new products and services.
      3. They probably got the list of clients by reopening one of the web service accounts which he used to manage them.
      4. The clients who fall for it are probably unsure about the contract they had with him. Billing businesses for made up services is a surprisingly effective scam, even when the fraudster doesn't have any credentials which enable posing as a former business partner.
      5. The tools may not be free, but everybody's desperate for customers and storage is cheap. Reactivating an account is probably possible in many cases. Yes, it's sloppy and any service giving access to an old account on the basis of an email account alone deserves a public flogging. That's just one more problem with putting important business data into "the cloud" instead of keeping it on your local computer, where it belongs.

  44. would you like to play a game? by flahwho · · Score: 1

    Global Thermonuclear War. That'll take care of those pesky Russians!

  45. Don't Fight It, Help Out! by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    I can think of no better way to develop the sort of relationship you want with these people than to give them some assistance. A new web site offering credit card numbers, pr0n of various disgusting kinds and passwords to similar sites, "secrets of hacking [x]'s government sites", an enormous list of movies and such available for download, an international banking concern planned to assist others in recovering funds from dead relatives' accounts, and as many similar offering as you can imagine, is just what's needed. Of course the contact information should be theirs (even if it had been yours previously). Advertising it on usenet should help spread the word. Whatever you can do to send them /.'ing levels of traffic of all kinds will help make your point. Also, publicizing their contact info on multilevel marketing sites/newsgroups and Chinese manufacturer/wholesalers sites will get them more offers than it would take to please any such assholes. Devote some thought and time to it and I'll bet you can cause them far more trouble than they've caused you. And your old clients? Let them know that as the new owners of your old service, they'd be glad to service pets and farm animals on webcam and/or DVDs sent free for the asking. Currency exchange by email at 1:1,000 rates. Sex tour vacations for $200 including airfare. Official funds collection point for unspecified non-governmental armed freedom fighter organizations world wide. Recovered/liberated fissionables, pure plant extracts direct from South American mountains and middle eastern flower fields, all for pennies a day!

    And of course if any of these attract enough public attention and appear to be illegal, law enforcement at the cloner's location as well as elsewhere would almost certainly want to know.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  46. Re:Dear Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian mafia.... blink and you're dead... the joke went completely over the moderators heads, a.k.a. ''woosh''.

  47. Re:Russian hosting [Dancing with 3rd-World] by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

    Mmm yes because once a domain is registered in one place it can never be registered elsewhere.

  48. got to be more to the story by corbettw · · Score: 1

    What third-party web hostings apps were you using? And why did you leave your customers' data in them when you closed up shop? This whole thing reeks of incompetence on your part and possible stupidity on your former customers' part (if someone I used to do business with sent me an invoice for services after not sending any for months/years, I'd at least contact them to see if it was valid, possibly just delete it and see if they send another one).

    At this point, you have a responsibility to contact your former customers and let them know it's not you sending out new invoices. Whether they end up paying them or not is their problem, but you created this mess by not acting responsibly. Don't be surprised if some of them expect you to reimburse them for paying the Russians.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  49. In Soviet Russia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, site cloners fight you!

  50. No by pigphish · · Score: 1

    You cannot win against mother Russia.

  51. Just report it, there's nothing else you can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically, you're not part of the dispute, even though they used your old stuff, the dispute is between the scammers and the scammed companies. Unless the scammed companies can prove criminal negligence on your part, there is no way you can legally fight back, other than reporting the crime to the FBI, which I assume you already did.

  52. Re:Not many options, but to ease your conscience.. by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    While I have your attention, shame on you for letting your business go dark without tying up the loose ends (e.g., informing your customers). I feel for your customers.

    To be fair, he didn't say the customers are paying. It's entirely possible that he did tidy up loose ends, and now former customers are contacting him directly and saying, "Uh, what's going on? We stopped doing business years ago..."

  53. Re:ok, so you abandoned it and your customers by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    Clearly the modder misread and thought it said Inciteful when he made his choice.

  54. Possible trend? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
    I was first wondering how they knew this guy's domain would be profitable, but then I realized it could be done en masse. With "domain tasting" it coudl even be done without much financial risk.

    Register a ton of old expired domains. Set up catch-all email accounts. See what legit services send you marketing emails implying you had a prior relationship. If you don't find any, cancel the domain registration. If you do, pay for it, reset passwords, and start harvesting.

    Ugh.

  55. One solution by neurosine · · Score: 1

    There's this great invention discovered just this millennium most commonly referred to as the password. If the interloper is circumventing them, you should simply send an email to your client mailing list(assuming such an entity exists) informing them not to pay anything to your old I assume now defunct company. I would recommend that you send the same email to your previous vendors. At least then you've fulfilled your care of duty. Outside of this you can panic and run around in curlicues until hitting the nearest brick wall, which will hopefully have a calming effect. If you freak out the terrorists win...

  56. Re: Can I fight back? by Kirin+Fenrir · · Score: 1

    Yes. Go on 4chan and tell them they hurt a cat.

    --
    Caffeine is my anti-drug!

    Duranin - A NWN2 Roleplaying Persistent World
  57. Re:It's Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site cloners are in Russia. He's not living in Russia. Even if he were, going vigilante on a bunch of gangsters would only get him killed. At best he'd be like the people who fly to Nigeria to get their money back from 419 scammers.

  58. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah bla bal bla abl bla a jasdhajdhasjd lol k

  59. All your base are belong to us! (google x-lated) by prodevel · · Score: 1

    !

  60. Re:ok, so you abandoned it and your customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful? The new site owners are scamming his old customers by billing FRAUDULENTLY. If this were just them doing more work maybe the above post would not be a troll.

    So, what exactly is the problem for this guy? These scammers aren't preventing him from making a living from this domain/web site since he admits he stopped using it for financial gain years ago.

    It sucks for his ex customers and I don't condone this kind of activity, but really, where's the problem for him? His ex customers should take action to protect themselves, but it's not for him to do.

    If they are still his customers in some other venture, then sure, he may have difficulty explaining why he's fraudulently billing them. Wait, let me think about it for just half a second - NO, HE WON'T. He knows, and they know that he doesn't run that business or web site anymore. Everybody concerned knows it's not him.

    It seems to me that the real issue is that he got burned because he did nothing to protect the clients he claims to be so concerned about when he stopped doing business with them, and indeed, most likely he did nothing to protect them when he still was doing business with them.

    He brought it on himself, he screwed a lot of people because of his incompetence/laziness/greed, and now he wants Slashdot to fix it for him. Well guess what Bub? That aint gonna happen.

  61. Cheap Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We always advise clients these days if they want to dump a domain simply pay for an extra 5 years of registration and send the domain nowhere for those 5 years. Cheap insurance.

  62. SOVIET RUSSIA by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, site clones YOU!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  63. put this in bold by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the fundamental thing to take away from this incident, and, while it may be obvious, it deserves stating plainly:

    Domain control / email address control is an authentication tool.

    We've brushed by the concept in prior conversations about validating new user sign-ups.

    Implications include, as in this scenario, human verification by looking at a web page of a familiar domain, human verification by email correspondence with a familiar email address, and password resetting when in control of an email address; SSL certificate-based identity (if the decrypted certificate can also be acquired), URL -referenced data validity (executables for download), and probably a number of other authentication/control mechanisms reliant on domain/address -- your ideas are solicited.

    DNS hijacking, then, should be a serious concern. DJB warned about cache poisoning via brute-force source port + transaction ID spoofing in 1999. A long time went by before the issue got enough publicity (in 2008) to force the major DNS software purveyors to clean up their acts. This guy needs to be taken seriously.

    1. Re:put this in bold by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      ...your ideas are solicited.

      An idea, in the form of more detail on the "email address control" part: Just the left hand side of an email address.

  64. mother nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it seems weed even grows on the internet.

  65. Maybe this is an info gathering expedition instead by tra4d · · Score: 1

    Did anyone ever think that since this was given by an anonymous reader, that they are actually thinking of doing this and are looking to see if they will be caught or not. Hmmmm....

  66. My boss gunshy about IP thieves(read Free lancers) by stimpleton · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    5 years ago, I got my current job as they fired their freelancer who worked for us 3 days including 1 onsite. Over time he had quietly shifted websites host, Advice was offered that this was ok. Later discovered, that included domain names to his own registrar and began billing clients directly. Other minor things such as the main webadmin account forwarded to his personal email.

    Moving forward to now....we had job interviews. My boss gave a no nonsense directive; Reject any CV's where the applicant is a FreeLancer, Including any Part-Time employed listing FreeLancing as the other balance. In interviews any mention of doing Freelancing from the applicant was a death sentence(job wise). It was interesting to observe. This being my first involvement in the hiring process. One could debate the rights and wrongs of my bosses attitude, but that was what is was, and the perception itself is all that matters.

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
  67. Department "K" by Max_W · · Score: 1

    You are to file an official complaint to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russian Federation www.mvd.ru , into the department "K" (Fight against Computer Crimes).

    The website in Russian language, but I think it is not difficult to find someone who studied Russian in a school or know it natively. It may well work.

    1. Re:Department "K" by Max_W · · Score: 1

      Just try it, but write all details carefully in Russian language. Do not try to file complaint in English.

      One might have an impression that it will not work, but give it a try. For example, when 8 years old Justin Hansen (adopted Artem Saveyev) was sent by his mother from D.C. alone to Moscow with a note that she does not want to keep him anymore, it was a driver in Moscow who spent a lot of time and effort that this child did not end up sleeping in the street http://www.moscow-driver.com/news/2010-04-09.html

      Just find someone who can write in good Russian and file a detailed complaint at the Russian police website http://www.mvd.ru/

  68. How do we know? by Pirulo · · Score: 1

    You are not the Russians trying to counter the counter measures?

  69. Why does he care? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    I call B.S.

    Why does he care anymore?

    By his own admission:
    " I allowed to expire after years of non-use. A few weeks ago, I noticed that my old site was back online at the old domain. The site-cloners are now using my old email addresses to gain access to old third-party web services accounts (invoicing tools, etc.) and are fraudulently billing my clients for years of services."

    Years of non-use .... so why the sudden interest? Obviously you don't care about these clients anymore, you didn't keep in touch with them or continue working for them, why do you care if several years later someone approaches them pretending to be you and asks for money? Were you using these clients for reference? If so, why would you ever let your site expire?

    This whole story doesn't add up. I've had online businesses and allowed the domains to expire, if someone contacted my old customers to try and bill them I wouldn't care at all.

    Simplest solution is usually correct: what sounds more likely is you have a disgruntled designer or programmer take over your site and complain to your clients and now you're mad and want your site back.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:Why does he care? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Years of non-use .... so why the sudden interest? Obviously you don't care about these clients anymore, you didn't keep in touch with them or continue working for them, why do you care if several years later someone approaches them pretending to be you and asks for money?

      How about complaints and possibly police investigations coming your way? If someone pretending to be Mr X asks for money the obvious place to start complaining is Mr X. And being investigated for fraud is definitely no fun, no matter how you look at it.

  70. Re:Not many options, but to ease your conscience.. by jsmcdougall · · Score: 1

    Hi HikingStick,

    I'm the original poster. The site is http://www.fruition.ws/ if you want to take a look at the scam.

    I shut down everything properly. All my former clients were well aware that I was no longer in business. Their sites and services were transferred to other companies. In fact, that's how I learned of the scam. One of my former clients tracked me down once she received a new email invoice (with PayPal Pay Now button) for YEARS of services—fraudulent, of course. The thing is that the invoice was exactly what I used to send folks, because they had gained access to my exact account through my old email address. Luckily, no one paid anything before I was able to shut down the invoicing account and alert PayPal.

    In hindsight, I should have closed the invoicing account, but since it was free I figured I'd let it sit. That, apparently, was a bad decision.

  71. Re:ok, so you abandoned it and your customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are so many people on Slashdot so stupid? The Russians AREN'T providing a service; they're just FRAUDULENTLY billing his old customers for services NOT provided.

  72. or maybe its just misoginy in action by decora · · Score: 0

    god help the woman who uses a female ID on slashdot

  73. "Catch All" by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Which is the pure definition of "Catch All" email.

    * Only to be activated when you got perfect SPAM defense..

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  74. It just smells weird .. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    1. Catch All addresses

    2. By capturing all e-mails coming to the * (Catch All) address

    3. There are enough tools on the web to find that one out; as you might know, privacy is not real on the public web

    4. There are certain DNS registrars sending mail to billing contacts to pay up -to them- so they can transfer the domain and make you a customer. If those websites are still in the air, I can imagine there might be a customer believing the invoice was real.

    5. They do .. and many keep nagging about it too..
    5b. It's easy in many cases to find out which tools a business uses once you got in touch with it.
    5c. Some of them send company/program updates, the second step is using the e-mail address to request a "lost password".

    My question:

    What I would not understand is, which customer would pay up to a russian bank account? Does the squatter own an american bank account to wire money?
    In Europe, we use the IBAN system for international transfers.

    That already makes it impossible for the squatter to continue such abuse on the financial platform once the victim files a complaint; as it is a closely watched and backlogged SWIFT system through entire Europe. I wonder how exactly this Russian masks himself to be having an American account, unless anyone without identity papers can get those?...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  75. sopssa the loser who sits on slashdot all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject line above, and get some real skills sopssa you forums troll. All you do is sit around slashdot all day and that only tells the rest of us you are nothing more than a welfare case.

  76. Re:Not many options, but to ease your conscience.. by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    I apologize for assuming you did not shut things down or inform your customers. Now, my sympathies extend to you as well. Too bad we don't have any real meaningful legislation to allow recourse in these types of issues.

    My condolences.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  77. Re:Not many options, but to ease your conscience.. by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    From the reply I received, he did tie up most ends, so I apologized to him and extended my sympathies.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...