Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Quickly Revises "Sexting" Ad For Kin Phone

theodp writes "Microsoft's Kin mobile phone project came under fire as Consumer Reports and others pointed out that a promotional video looked like an inappropriate endorsement of 'sexting,' prompting a quick edit and an apologetic tweet. 'The video,' observed Consumer Reports, 'includes a downright creepy sequence [beginning around 0:33] in which a young man is shown putting a Kin under his shirt and apparently snapping a picture of one of his naked breasts. The breast is then shown on the phone's screen, just before the guy apparently sends it to someone. Next we see the face of a young woman, seemingly the recipient, with an amused expression...'"

69 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. LOLwut? by PhxBlue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, I could see a problem if it were a female breast ... but who the fuck thinks that sending a picture of a male breast is "sexting"?

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    1. Re:LOLwut? by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay, I could see a problem if it were a female breast ... but who the fuck thinks that sending a picture of a male breast is "sexting"?

      If they think a man's bare chest is in any way a private part or constitutes nudity, then I imagine these prudes would have a heart attack if they went to any beach.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:LOLwut? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay, I could see a problem if it were a female breast ... but who the fuck thinks that sending a picture of a male breast is "sexting"?

      Women? Gay people?

    3. Re:LOLwut? by lul_wat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hello? Also this ad is terrible. Atleast cover some of the features of the device, I can already put my current cellphone up my shirt o that's not a selling point

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    4. Re:LOLwut? by AnonGCB · · Score: 4, Informative

      As mentioned elsewhere, male breasts are generally not considered a private part, regardless of who they are attractive for.

      --
      http://CryoLANparty.com/ A lan I'm staff on!
    5. Re:LOLwut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Weirdo QotD: In 100 years, would male nipples be considered private if we started wearing bras/tops today?

    6. Re:LOLwut? by ArundelCastle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As mentioned elsewhere, male breasts are generally not considered a private part, regardless of who they are attractive for.

      Which is clearly a cultural and societal double-standard that topfree-rights advocates oppose. Of course back in my day, males didn't have breasts, they had pecs.
      Lets use this example: Is a pierced male nipple somehow less sexual than a pierced female nipple, purely because a man can display his chest freely? The result and motivation for the wearer is arguably the same regardless of gender or sexual preference. Sexy is whatever gets you hot, not what a ratings board or a family advocate group says.

    7. Re:LOLwut? by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lets use this example: Is a pierced male nipple somehow less sexual than a pierced female nipple, purely because a man can display his chest freely?

      Yes.

    8. Re:LOLwut? by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      She looks nice. She's got a beautiful face and body. But I bet you didn't see that, focused as you were on her breasts.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    9. Re:LOLwut? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can pretend the US is some how leagues above everyone else in freedom but it doesn't make it true. You're less likely to see women walking on the beach topless in the US, you're more likely to get sued (in fact lawsuits the subjects of numerous TV shows), you're more likely to be attacked for holding different religious beliefs, especially if you believe in no god.

      And here are some examples of Europeans freedom of speech:

      Pat Condell http://www.youtube.com/user/patcondell

      Nigel Farage http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bypLwI5AQvY

      Nick Griffin http://bnp.org.uk/

      Sure Europe has twats, like Nick Griffin, crying about their rights being trampled on but the mere fact he can hang out with the David Duke, hasn't been stopped for his comments on Muslims and has been allowed to even participate in politics says to me that European free speech is doing fine.

      Gun laws aren't even as restrictive as some Americans make out. Very few countries ban guns out right. Even the NRA has stated that, for instance, 10% of Austrians own hand guns compared to 16% of Americans. http://www.nraila.org/Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=72

      I do support the freedom to own guns and don't think own even automatics should be completely out of the question (though it should be quite hard to get them) but I understand why the laws exist and in a free society if vast majority do agree with the laws then where is the issue with the law? Some people value things differently. The Japanese may think the US is odd for not having public baths but that doesn't necessarily make the US wrong (or right).

      There are some limits to freedom of speech just as there are some limits in the US and every other country. Europe is by no means perfect but the US certainly isn't either and it isn't

    10. Re:LOLwut? by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because everyone knows that European countries have a centuries-long history of not horribly killing people for showing any kind of deviance what-so-ever.

      It's bad when the prudes leave your continent to seek more freedom.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    11. Re:LOLwut? by Larryish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sine when does Microsoft support "sexting" your "kin"?

      What is this, rural Arkansas?

    12. Re:LOLwut? by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I do support the freedom to own guns and don't think own even automatics should be completely out of the question (though it should be quite hard to get them)

      Either automatic weapons in the hands of citizenry are okay or they are not. Which one is it?

      I have nothing but contempt for people who don't have the guts to ban something outright but try to make it de facto banned by forcing people to jump through hoops.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. MOOBS!? MOOBS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think somebody is confused about what sexting is.

    1. Re:MOOBS!? MOOBS! by Moridin42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I.. hope you're joking.

      If not, I have news for you. Every phone that has ever advertised that it is easy to take pictures is a phone that has advertised the exact same thing. Unless, of course, the process of sending those pictures has been some arcane ritual that can only take place on the third minute of the seventh hour the day after your first born takes its first breath. Which is probably not the case.

      What you take pictures of and how easy it is to take them are separate issues. If it is easy to take a picture of your dog, it is also easy to take a picture of a naked person. But I don't see any outrage over the iPhone's photo taking process, which is also pretty simple. Ditto the lack of outrage over Android, Motorola, LG, Samsung ...

      If it is the content of the advert in question, where is the outrage for the endless commercials (read: porn) depicting bare chested men pushing beer, beach vacation spots, travel reservations, antiperspirants, body wash, exercise or diet programs, or whatever else. The damage such lewd imagery does to the children!

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
  3. Was it hairy!? by Merakis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mother's hide your daughters. I hear 'The Nippler' is in town.

    1. Re:Was it hairy!? by codepunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it did show the mans tit.

      --


      Got Code?
  4. Uptight much? by Rog7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh good lord, how uptight does our society need to be?

    It's a contradiction too, because sexualized youth seems to be perfectly acceptable as long as it's from a Mickey Mouse Club alumni that promises abstinence.
     

    1. Re:Uptight much? by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah but me committing mass murder with a tactical nuke in FO3 is perfectly OKAY! I'll be over here, beating my head against the door frame. Maybe when I pass out and wake up, things will make sense. Or I'll be brain damaged...I think that's win-win!

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Uptight much? by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

      TPIUWP

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Uptight much? by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No shit. Considering how often we hear about porn moving technology, how big 'The Valley' is, and so forth, can we please shed this neo-Puritanical bullshit in the US?

      Guess what: normal, healthy people like to fuck. Normal, healthy people (especially men) like to look at other normal, healthy people. Just because your version of the FSM said it was all "eww, icky, gross" does not mean the rest of us should suffer.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:Uptight much? by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Here is the thing. It would be nice if we in the US were not so afraid of bodies. OTOH, this is changing. There was a time not so long ago when we could not show a woman wearing a bra on TV. Now women's bodies are becoming less of a taboo, but men's bodies seem to be almost as much as taboo. With this the case, it seems as if there is some sort of objectifying going on rather than just the depiction of the natural form. It would be different if both genders were parading around in skivvies.

      But in the real world there are rules. And the biggest rule is, and should be, that we are in control of our own bodies and the depictions of our own bodies. The next biggest rule is a most kids are not often making long term decisions. How many of us ditched high school to go have some fun. Such decisions are not death, and the there is nothing wrong with taking naked pictures as kids have been doing for years. These pictures have even gotten passed around. What happens now is it becomes very easy to lose control of those images and negative consequences can be long term. Therefore most parents want to limit the possibility that their kids will do such things, and if a phone seems to be centered on sending pictures, perhaps the parent won't buy it. It is not that anyone things that phones are not used to take and send such pictures, no one is that stupid, it is just, IMHO, few people would buy a phone advertised as such activity being the primary purpose, as appeared to be in the MS video. Likewise, I think most parents would not buy their kids a subscription to Adult Friend Finder, even though online dating is likely going to play a big part in any kids future. There is just no reason to emphasize casual sex at that age.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Uptight much? by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He also says not to wear cotton-poly blends. Forgive me if I'll take his advice with a grain of salt.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:Uptight much? by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the kind of thing that can come back and haunt you months or years later.

      But ONLY in the puritanical society described. If it wasn't a big deal to begin with, then it also wouldn't be a big deal to be able to "come back and haunt you".

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    7. Re:Uptight much? by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That rule is for Jews only, like the rule against eating milk with meat. A gentile can eat a cheeseburger, or wear cotton-poly blends, without being unrighteous.

      The milk rule has to do with a verse in Exodus listing some religious rituals Jews were commanded to perform and others that that were forbidden. One of the forbidden rituals was boiling a baby goat in its mother's milk. Aside from considerations of cruelty, 20th Century archeology discovered that the Ugarites, one of Israel's neighbors, practiced precisely such a ritual.

      The prohibition against seething a kid in its mother's milk prevented the incorporation of this foreign ritual into Jewish life. Later, when that law was no longer needed, it was reinterpreted to forbid mixing milk and meat at all, even though each was allowed separately. It was a commandment, and since there is no mechanism for repealing a divine law, the Jews had to find a way to obey it. The prohibition on mixed fibers is probably of the same nature. It probably addressed a specific threat of cultural assimilation or religious syncretism.

      The function of many of the commandments of Jewish religious law seems to be maintaining a distinct Jewish cultural identity. If the Pentateuch were still open to additions today, they'd probably add a prohibition against Jews setting up live trees in their house. To us, the intent would be clear: Jews should not let Christmas holiday practices creep into their culture. Two or three thousand years from now, long after people stop setting up Christmas trees, that prohibition might seem weird and arbitrary.

      In an ironic way, it is the arbitrariness of such a law that justifies it. The entire point is to prevent the Jewish people from assimilating into the cultures that surround them. Laws against killing or bearing false witness are sensible laws for anyone, but were all Jews to follow only such laws, it would be doubtful that Jews would maintain their distinct cultural identity for thousands of years more.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Uptight much? by Klinky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So basically it sounds like someone bending the word of "God" to really just be a way of telling other people what to do/not to do and that the divine word isn't really divine after all.

    9. Re:Uptight much? by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was also a holy book all about sex that a bishop got rid of, destroying every copy; The Gospel of Eve was destroyed in 3rd century ad by Epiphanius of Salamis for encouraging various sex acts.

  5. Fucking Puritans by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People have bodies.. get over it.

    Sexting is a "phenomena" of prudes having to face the fact that not everyone experiences the same reservations as them about nudity. No-one is forcing them to participate.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Fucking Puritans by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fucking Puritans



      Amusing choice of adjectives.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Fucking Puritans by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sexting is a "phenomena" of prudes having to face the fact that not everyone experiences the same reservations as them about nudity. No-one is forcing them to participate.

      Clearly you've never received a visit from "Mr. Goatse" on your cell. I had to soak mine in bleach for an hour, and Verizon wouldn't honor the warranty after that.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:Fucking Puritans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Puritanism - the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy." - Henry Mencken

    4. Re:Fucking Puritans by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

      People have bodies.. get over it.

      As the spokesman for the brain-in-vat segment of the Slashdot community, I submit that you are an insensitive clod.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    5. Re:Fucking Puritans by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the frightening thing is that anybody would think that large numbers of other people would recognize an image of genitals as being theirs. Face recognition it isn't. Yet. Ahem.

  6. Depends on the man-tit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Depends on the man-tit by McGiraf · · Score: 2, Funny

      -10 gross , i new i should not have clicked this link....

    2. Re:Depends on the man-tit by longhairedgnome · · Score: 2, Funny

      o rly?

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
  7. Why is this even an issue? by Securityemo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously? Is people who think like this a large enough fraction of their market base that they actually feel like they have to appease them?

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
    1. Re:Why is this even an issue? by AlamedaStone · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously? Is people who think like this a large enough fraction of their market base that they actually feel like they have to appease them?

      The only reason to defend sexting is if you like child pornography. You aren't a ... pedophile... are you?

      I mean, think of the children.

      The children know that Freedom is what we believe in our hearts to be morally right! And we here in America love our freedom, no matter what some experts would like us to believe! After all, 9/11 happened because they hated our Freedom, so anyone that can't think of the children might as well be terrorists. It's about Family Values.

      Family, Faith and Freedom are what separate us and make us the greatest nation in the world!

      God Bless America.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    2. Re:Why is this even an issue? by deniable · · Score: 4, Funny

      I mean, think of the children.

      The Thought Police would like a word with you. Come along please.

    3. Re:Why is this even an issue? by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing. " ~ Poe

      --
      'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
    4. Re:Why is this even an issue? by AlamedaStone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be easier to tell it's a parody if it actually contained some humor instead of mean spirited ranting.

      It would be harder to do a parody if it weren't for humorous mean-spirited ranting.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
  8. Sexting by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly I was a teenager in the wrong millennium.

    1. Re:Sexting by codepunk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do you dream of being a teen again and your friends sending pictures of man boobies to you?

      --


      Got Code?
    2. Re:Sexting by codepunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had it pretty good in class back in the day, the chicks in class just flat out showed me their junk. Who in the hell wants a picture when you can
      see it live.

      --


      Got Code?
    3. Re:Sexting by feepness · · Score: 4, Funny

      I dunno. If you're chicks had junk I'm not sure I'm all that envious.

  9. It could have been worse by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    They could have shown the Blue Balls Of Death.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  10. This commercial by codepunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Never mind the MOOBS this commercial is worse than the one with Bill wiggling his ass. You can tell some 70's Microsoft Hippie Chick manager wrote and produced it, total fail.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:This commercial by Dhalka226 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why? Have you ever heard the saying "all publicity is good publicity?"

      I'm not going that far, but for creating a "controversial" ad likely on the cheap they have half the Internet talking about it and their product, one way or another. My exposure to the Kin is now one TV commercial and one Internet conversation on Slashdot. One cost them a little money and one was completely free.

      I don't know if it was intentional. I doubt it matters. The reality is they just got hundreds of thousands of dollars of free advertising as everybody on the Internet and half the people on conventional "news" programs mention their product's name. Free.

      Total fail? No.

  11. Whats the Problem? by drolli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean it wouldnt be something I do, but both persons involved seem to be grown-ups, in a perfectly concious state, and it seems to be funny to both (for whatever reason). To me the complete scene is as cryptic as the idea why i would buy a phone from Microsoft; maybe this is just to show that the phone does not have real features going beyond an arbitrary cameraphone from 5years ago (but *with touch*). Overall the video seems to aim at people around 25 i would say.

    So i dont understand if that is "sexting", i dont understand what the word exactly means (it seems diffuse), i dont see why i would complain about adults (male or female) sending pictures of breasts to other adults (as long as both sides are fine with it). But i think nodoby should complain by depicting seemingly funny things in an advertisement, even if the people in it act highly irrational.

    I am actually more annoyed by advertisments still exhibiting old gender role models.

  12. Easy share, easy go... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Kin series of phone seems to be all about easy sharing with a green button dedicated to that called the "Kin Spot"... but well, that can be taken the wrong way, can't it?

  13. Sexting with kin? by bipbop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sexting with kin? Now your incest can have more manboobular visuals? What?

  14. This keeps happening by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am sure that it is part of the advertising plan to be "forced" to withdraw sensational ads as a way of gaining extra publicity. I have never seen this ad, and only once heard about the Kin phone, but now I have been exposed (oh dear) to the campaign as a news item.

    I am sure that if nobody complained then the ad executives would plant their own complaints in the news just to get people to talk about it. How many times do you hear news reports about people being outraged without ever saying who those people are. I imagine that it is rare to need to resort to doing their own complaints, because the people who get offended by this are so predictably vocal. And who cares if you piss them off, because the target market are young people who think sexting is OK and who would be quite happy to rebel against the prudes.

    1. Re:This keeps happening by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am sure that it is part of the advertising plan to be "forced" to withdraw sensational ads as a way of gaining extra publicity. I have never seen this ad, and only once heard about the Kin phone, but now I have been exposed (oh dear) to the campaign as a news item.

      That's exactly what I thought. As far as I can tell it was ONE blogger who only said that there was something a bit creepy about the ad. Nobody would have noticed or cared until MS publicly withdrew the ad and apologized, at which point every single news outlet picked up the story in a way that's mostly sympathetic to MS and its new phone. Whether it was accidental or deliberate it worked out pretty well for Microsoft.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  15. Reverse Streisand effect? by jamesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd never even heard of the 'Kin Phone' until just now... is Slashdot being assimilated into the Microsoft marketing machine?

  16. Re:"our society"? by Your.Master · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because society B is far more ridiculous than society A, does not mean society A is not itself ridiculous.

  17. Black man and white woman kissing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Toward the end of the video (ad) there is a black man and white woman kissing.

    Back when I was young that would have been the controversy, not a white dudes nipple.

    So from that point of view I think we are making progress.

  18. Creepy? by tomthepom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Creepy? Really? What exactly is 'creepy' about it?
    Unless you mean 'likely to make a large section of the population feel uneasy because they've been cowed into a pathetic state of guilt and self-censorship in the face of a narrow-minded and hypocritical moral hysteria of a small minority'. Yeh you're right, that is creepy.
     

  19. MS gets human needs by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Funny

    Showing the pleasure you cannot have with an ipad.
    The world has moved to an audio and visual level and expects it anytime, anywhere.
    We have the software, hardware and bandwidth, so lets have fun.
    Why wait for a US telco or "Jobs" to understand that people like to reach out and relate in both the visual and emotional?.
    MS could have done it in a more nudge nudge way, but when has MS ever really understood marketing beyond a tool of market control.
    But for buzz and a way better than Apple hardware offereing - a real win :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  20. self pedophiling by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In some states doing something like this could be construed as "sexual relations with a minor" (i.e., yourself). Theoretically, that could land you in jail for 5-10 years and forever be labeled a pedophile.

    'Sex' once meant intercourse whereby the female could be impregnated. Now it can mean anything, including petting, phone sex, Internet sex, and sexting using SMS. Someday, it might mean alluding to sex through indirect references such as these. Eventually, it might even mean any arousal of the autonomic nervous system. You may someday get busted for having a wet dream. I am sure that will never happen until, of course, it does happen.

  21. Quick edit? by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    prompting a quick edit and an apologetic tweet.

    How quick was it? Was it so quick, that you'd think they had the edit prepared in advance, just waiting for the "outrage"?
    Come on guys, those are old, old tricks.

    So, anyway, Microsoft have a new mobile device again with a hip ad again, awkward name again, that's trying to compete with a similar device from Apple again. Best of luck to them.

    "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein

  22. I'm glad they take sexting seriously by theY4Kman · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...because no one else will.

  23. Why is this an issue? by jevring · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why the moral panic? So what if people see some breasts? Male or female. I don't get why this is even an issue.

    --
    Move sig!
  24. Microsoft's 'kin mobile phone project by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft's Kin mobile phone project

    Hate to be a 'kin grammar Nazi but there's a 'kin apostrophe missing there (to indicate missing letters - actually there should be one after as well, but that looks silly and the "g" is usually silent anyway).

    As in: "'kin hell, some 'kin perv has sent me a 'kin picture of his 'kin moob! Ugh, its 'kin mingin'!"

    They've failed to 'kin notice that, but they're worried about 'kin man tits?

    (Plus, Kin Sexting sounds a bit incestuous...)

    (To appease Pratchett fans, perhaps the next Android phone will be the "-ing"...)

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  25. No dongs please by itsdapead · · Score: 2, Funny

    Send pictures of your dong to Microsoft now!

    Probably won't work - I'm sure that the Kin will detect those yellow dots they put on banknotes and refuse to take the picture. I expect even Vietnam have adopted them by now.

    (Disclaimer: this is a joke based on the fact that us westerners think the name of the Vietnamese currency is funny. If you find yellow spots on the other sort of dong, please seek medical advice).

    Which gives me a brilliant idea! Soccer moms of the world!! Get your sprogs' privates tattooed with yellow dots and no nasty pervert will ever be able to take photos or print pictures of them!!!

    Hang on - I need to call the patent office...

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  26. sexting with your kin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    sexting with your kin? That's something only Microsoft 'Research' could have thought of.

    1. Re:sexting with your kin? by fbjon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Eventually it'll progress to phone-sex with your kin. And before you know it, someone's hacked it, and you'll be forking little baby processes with your kin. A rather incestuous device, it seems.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  27. The point by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While the ad only showed a mans chest, that is not the point of the controversy.
    The point is that the ad was basically advocating sexting.

    I am pretty sure no one was mad about the ad containing a males chest.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:The point by RazorSharp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it wasn't and the fact that you and them believe it does shows your immaturity and the fact that you are uncomfortable with the human body.

      Grow the fuck up, people.

      When the phone was announced Microsoft said its target market was teenagers. Would you want your teenage daughter to be so comfortable with her body that everyone at her high school has her tits on their phone?

      If this weren't a cellphone commercial with teenagers as the target market there would be no controversy, but it is. The whole point of the advertisement is to showcase the device's capabilities and about the only thing they do with it is take a picture of a guy's chest and send it out. The clear implication is that the phone is great for "sexting."

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  28. Newsflash by cyclomedia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone* on the planet has breasts and nipples. The two types of trouser monster are distributed half and half*. Everyone* who's undergone puberty has sex, usually for fun. One day everyone's naked pictures and sex stories will be on the internet and no one will care anymore, it might put a bunch of celebrity papparazi out of business because no one's career will be ruined because of naked videos or pictures because it wont be a big deal. Eventually.

    * Approximate values.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.