Slashdot Mirror


Volcanic Ash Heading Towards North America

chocomilko writes "St. John's International Airport, the easternmost airport in Canada, has begun canceling flights due to worries of ash from Iceland's Eyjafjallajokull volcano, leaving travelers stranded after the weekend's Juno awards festival. Early reports stated that there was a 30% chance ash would reach the island by early Monday; Air Canada has issued an all-day travel advisory. A thick blanket of fog currently covering the city isn't helping matters, either."

37 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. Affects on Europe by Celt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ireland's airspace as well as Englands, France, Germany, Finland etc all closed at present and has been since before the weekend, lots of people stuck in other countrys unable to get home and are trying any means available to try and get home. US/Canada will really feel it if the same thing happens. ....and people think we're not all connected in the world :)

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:Affects on Europe by Celt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah heard that, these people had to buy bikes in order to board a ferry in france
      http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0418/breaking15.html?via=mr

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    2. Re:Affects on Europe by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 5, Funny

      The US train system is excellent if you are coal, or liquid polypropylene, or the like. For humans not so much.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    3. Re:Affects on Europe by Kirijini · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The US train system is excellent if you are coal...

      Not so much. I know what you mean - coal plants rely on the railroad system for the delivery of coal, and as a natural consequence, the railroad system is tailored for delivering coal. But, nevertheless, the coal plant owners are not happy with the US railroad system, and it is far from "excellent" to them.

      Coal plants are completely hostage to whomever owns the railroad that goes up to their plant. For some plants, the last 10 miles or so is owned by a different railroad company than the one that provides most of the shipping, and the owner of that "last mile" has absolutely no competition in delivering coal to that one plant. And naturally, they charge an enormous premium, as compared to plants that receive their coal from other railways or other delivery methods (barge, or even trucking).

      The US train system is like any other network infrastructure, including the internet - a robust "last mile" is just as important as a robust "backbone." And competition at each segment is a good thing, but rare because such capital-heavy infrastructure is extremely prone to consolidation, monopolies, and rent-seeking - all of which lead to stagnation, and all of which need to be regulated for the public (and economic!) good. In some ways, this might be one explanation as to why the airline industry is doing better than passenger trains - they rely on a completely different (almost "peer to peer," as in, airport to airport) infrastructure that allows competition; and despite the heavy capital investment required, its much harder to exclusively own part of the network and lock out competition.

      This is all based on some readings I did in college on the American energy infrastructure. I don't still have those books, so I don't guarantee the accuracy of everything said here, but, consider this article a citation.

  2. That just sucks ash... eh? by MeNotU · · Score: 4, Funny

    That just sucks ash... eh?

  3. Spellcheck fail by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's Eyjafjallajökull. I barely knew which volcano you were talking about.

    1. Re:Spellcheck fail by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      And back on topic, the Brit. Navy is actually sending two warships over to the US to pick up people. I think that's pretty impressive.

      That's what you say now. Just wait until you hear about the "passengers" having to swab the poop deck and service the engines. Worst.cruise.ever!

    2. Re:Spellcheck fail by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      And back on topic, the Brit. Navy is actually sending two warships over to the US to pick up people. I think that's pretty impressive.

      After all the news about the Tea Party rallies, I'm pretty nervous about the Brits sending over warships...

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  4. bankers take on the grounded flights by Xemu · · Score: 4, Funny

    This was overheard in London:

    The English Banker to the Icelandic representative for Kaupthing Bank:

    We said we wanted CASH... not ash!

    --
    Tell your friends about xenu.net
    1. Re:bankers take on the grounded flights by flex941 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Longer version:

      --

      Dear Iceland,

      We said "send CASH".

      Yours sincerely,
      United Kingdom

      --

      Dear United Kingdom,

      You should have stopped to consider that there is no letter "C" in the
      Icelandic alphabet before issuing your demand.

      With best,
      Iceland

      --

    2. Re:bankers take on the grounded flights by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 5, Funny

      The economy of Iceland's last request was to have its ashes spread across Europe.

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
    3. Re:bankers take on the grounded flights by tpheiska · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Iceland,

      We said "send HASH".

      Yours sincerely,
      The Netherlands

      --
      "wahts woring iwth my tyoping?"
    4. Re:bankers take on the grounded flights by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear UK, You should trust our files implicitly, but here's the hash anyway:
      76D08CAB8B28C5F447D47519454F0D94

      Yours sincerely,
      The Netherlands

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
  5. A word of advice by lammy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this situation unfolds for Canada / North America as it has done for Europe, they may wish to revise their means of communicating cancellations to passengers. The 'marker pen on a whiteboard' technique may be suitable for a handful of flights at a small regional airport but doesn't scale very well once an entire continent's airspace has been closed. Also, the hand-drawn "Sorry" with a sad face next to each flight number will start to take on a somewhat patronising tone.

    1. Re:A word of advice by yotto · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is Canada. The "Sorry" and the frowny face are actually dictated by law.

    2. Re:A word of advice by JamesP · · Score: 4, Funny

      And don't forget the 'Desolé' since everything has to be in french. I assume they should draw a frowny face with a french hat and a cigarette as well...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    3. Re:A word of advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And don't forget the 'Desolé' since everything has to be in french. I assume they should draw a frowny face with a french hat and a cigarette as well...

      Q:-(_...

  6. I'm Tired of Living in Harmony with Nature by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Funny

    How 'bout you?

    Bet you're feeling real good about driving that Prius designed to be oh-so-gentle on Mother Gaia, ain'tcha?

    Meanwhile, the belch from one unpronounceable volcano wipes out the cumulative effort from all of mankind over the past hundred years to purify the water and soil, and dwarfs all of our species' feeble, amateurish efforts to pollute them in the first place.

    Gimme a rainforest, a chainsaw, and a case of Red Bull. It's Payback Time!

    1. Re:I'm Tired of Living in Harmony with Nature by Marcika · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How 'bout you?

      Bet you're feeling real good about driving that Prius designed to be oh-so-gentle on Mother Gaia, ain'tcha?

      Meanwhile, the belch from one unpronounceable volcano wipes out the cumulative effort from all of mankind over the past hundred years to purify the water and soil, and dwarfs all of our species' feeble, amateurish efforts to pollute them in the first place.

      Gimme a rainforest, a chainsaw, and a case of Red Bull. It's Payback Time!

      Bollocks. You overestimate the volcano. The cancelled planes would have belched out 14 times more CO2 and SO2 than one pesky little volcano. Nature? Feeble, I say, bah!

    2. Re:I'm Tired of Living in Harmony with Nature by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even the comments for that link indicate that others think it is bogus, as it doesn't account for methane (a MAJOR greenhouse gas that volcanos emit) and other gases, and it has already been corrected many times. While interesting, you would have to be insane to use that data for anything important, like all Slashdot links.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  7. Its going to get much worse... by antonyb · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Its going to get much worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      First they run the country down and go bankrupt, then they set the place on fire... I'm wondering if this is somekind of insurance fraud?

  8. Re:SIGH by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think we here in the US have had that experience not too long ago. Not to be overly grim here, but the week after 9/11, there were no planes flying in the skies above the US. Not hearing the planes landing and taking off at a near-by major airport nor seeing them high in the sky flying into other airports in the region was pretty odd.

  9. Re:Who laughed? by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have passenger rail outside the northeast. You just rent a car, drive 90 miles to the depot, arrive near your destination, rent another car to drive 90 miles to your home. What could be easier? ;)

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  10. You're kidding, right? by Taagehornet · · Score: 4, Informative
  11. On the bright side.... by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A few more strong eruptions like this in different regions around the world, and there'll be enough ash in the sky to knock the temperature down a little bit. Global Warming is solved!

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  12. Re:SIGH by Tweezer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All aircraft engine manufacturers call for zero ash. I'm guessing that they figured that was the easiest thing to do as opposed to doing actual testing. Since it's never been tested properly, I wouldn't blame the governments for following the written specifications. I also doubt that any engine company is going to be willing to take on the lilability of publishing updated specifications allowing some ash.

  13. Re:How long till the Tea partiers blame Obama? by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kind of like everyone blamed Bush for anything that happened in the previous 8 years? Including a few hurricanes?

    No one blamed bush for Hurricane Katrina. Just for sitting on his ass when it hit, for appointing unqualified and flagrantly incompetent butt-buddies, excuse me, political henchmen to run FEMA, and for deliberately underfunding and eviscerating FEMA and nearly every other non-military federal agency in order to deliberately make them incapable of carrying out their mandate. Which worked brilliantly in his war against "big government", until we actually needed that government to rescue tens of thousands of people.

    Then we got our act together, at many times the expense, and with many times the casualties, than it would have entailed if a competent president had appointed a competent leader of FEMA, and not gutted the agency of funds and logistical support.

    And yes, everyone (except the hard-core right) quite correctly blames him for that. And the illegal war he started, and the financial implosion that was a direct result of Republican lassaiz-faire bank regulation (and which the Republicans are trying to continue today by filibustering any meaningful bank reform).

    It's bad enough they do these things and then try to make us feel bad for pointing out the error of their ways. It's even more disburbing how utterly incapable of learning from their mistakes, and correcting their ways, these idealogues are. They'd rather be stubbornly wrong regardless of the evidence, than have a hint of flip-flopping on an issue(what most of the rest of us would call "correcting a mistake")

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  14. Re:SIGH by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What is so odd to me is that many Europeans thought that Americans were laughing at them because the volcano interupted their air travel. I don't know anyone who thought that was funny at all. Do Europeans really think that we are that petty?

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  15. News Flash(es) by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a good, up-to-date list of eruptions in 2010. Updated fairly frequently, so it should give travelers a little insight before it hits the main media.

    1. Re:News Flash(es) by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, that link won't help. The ash from an eruption can travel great distances, and the direction changes with the wind.
      You're better of consulting your local http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_Ash_Advisory_Centre

  16. Interesting Animation of Dispersal by DieByWire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's an interesting animation of the dispersal from Denmarks's weather service: island_vulcano6000.gif

    --
    Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
  17. Re:SIGH by varcher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    determine if it's dangerous or not

    Actually, the danger isn't that planes will fall out of the sky or somesuch because they've encountered some ash. The problem comes from the glass/ash mixture having a rather big effect on engines and airframes' wear-and-tear. Flying thru the ash plume probably causes 10 or more times the normal wear on engines. However, the maintenance schedules are rather inflexible on planes.

    Net result? The flights won't be dangerous now. They'll be in a couple weeks/months, when you have 90% of your airplane fleet that has engine problems early, the civil aviation inspectors can't inspect them all, and the average european company becomes no more reliable than the lowliest north-african charter plane company.

    Sure, they could replace all those engines earlier. If they can find some outside of the counterfeit market at reasonable prices, that is.

    (short: Resuming flights before we can figure out the length of the emergency is short-term good, long-term bad)

  18. Re:Jet stream doesn't go that way. by actionbastard · · Score: 4, Informative

    Generally, yes. However, you need to look at this: http://wxmaps.org/pix/NHanim.html, to understand why it's possible for this to occur.

    --
    Sig this!
  19. Re:UK MET-OFFICE by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about the Norwegian air ambulance helicopter, the Finnish airforce jets, and the MET office aircraft that did fly up there and did come back with measurable effects on their aircraft?

    Or were they conveniently ignored because that doesn't fit well into an attempt to blame the met office?

    Oh, and besides:

    "During all those next days this first data-set never got adapted, updated with actual data or even checked again."

    [citation needed]

    I can't see any evidence anywhere whatsoever for the above quote, only evidence to the contrary- i.e. that continuous satellite data is being used (and not just by the met office), and also that the met office has as mentioned above sent aircraft up to test the effects too.

  20. Re:How long till the Tea partiers blame Obama? by VolciMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Kind of like everyone blamed Bush for anything that happened in the previous 8 years? Including a few hurricanes?

    No one blamed bush for Hurricane Katrina. Just for sitting on his ass when it hit, for appointing unqualified and flagrantly incompetent butt-buddies, excuse me, political henchmen to run FEMA, and for deliberately underfunding and eviscerating FEMA and nearly every other non-military federal agency in order to deliberately make them incapable of carrying out their mandate. Which worked brilliantly in his war against "big government", until we actually needed that government to rescue tens of thousands of people.

    Then we got our act together, at many times the expense, and with many times the casualties, than it would have entailed if a competent president had appointed a competent leader of FEMA, and not gutted the agency of funds and logistical support.

    And yes, everyone (except the hard-core right) quite correctly blames him for that. And the illegal war he started, and the financial implosion that was a direct result of Republican lassaiz-faire bank regulation (and which the Republicans are trying to continue today by filibustering any meaningful bank reform).

    It's bad enough they do these things and then try to make us feel bad for pointing out the error of their ways. It's even more disburbing how utterly incapable of learning from their mistakes, and correcting their ways, these idealogues are. They'd rather be stubbornly wrong regardless of the evidence, than have a hint of flip-flopping on an issue(what most of the rest of us would call "correcting a mistake")

    Regardless of whether or not the head of FEMA was qualified, what is FEMA's purpose? They are an "emergency" management agency. Louisiana and the city of New Orleans asked them to wait to come down.

    The mayor of New Orleans and the governor of Louisiana should take most or all of the blame for damages and injuries incurred during that hurricane. Hurricanes happen. New Orleans is below sea level. Katrina was a hurricane. It was heading towards New Orleans. And yet no one ordered an evacuation of the city until the storm was just hours away?

    Likewise, why were out-of-state contractors hired to work on the cleanup and rebuilding? Excluding folks like myself who volunteered to go work there with aid teams like the Red Cross, Samaritan's Purse, etc, why were local folks not hired? Sure, some of them were unqualified to build bridges. But how qualified do you ave to be to take a shovel and muck-out a building?

  21. Re:SIGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    You know, this thread starting with:

    Finally. All Canucks & Americans who laughed at us Europeans now get to experience how nice it is: no hassle, quiet skies, no contrails, stay-at-home and work -- or be stranded in interesting cities at your bosses' expenses !

    Maybe that's related, somehow?