Slashdot Mirror


Escalating Gmail/Spamming Attacks

We've been getting submissions about an uptick in compromised Gmail accounts in the last few days, but nothing that could be substantiated. Robert McMillan did a bit of digging and now reports in PC World that "Google is investigating a growing number of reports that hackers are breaking into legitimate Gmail accounts and then using them to send spam messages. The problem started about a week ago but seems to have escalated over the past few days. ... [I]n forum posts, Gmail users note that the hackers appear to be sending spam via Gmail's mobile interface — which gives mobile-phone users a way to check their Gmail accounts — and wonder if there may be a bug in the mobile interface that is allowing criminals to send the spam. ... Google says there's no Gmail bug. ... 'Spammers may sometimes use a mobile interface to access accounts they have already compromised because it's simpler for bots to use this method at large scale.'" Here's how to tell if your Gmail account has been accessed by bad guys, and what to do about it.

139 comments

  1. Recent Security Theft at Google by teknopurge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wasn't that google sso (Gaia) code ganked recently? Wonder if it's connected....

  2. First bug found? by kyrio · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the outcome of the stolen login source.

  3. I'd be surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if this didn't have an effect in Wall Street.

  4. This happened to my significant other by Polarism · · Score: 4, Interesting

    About a week ago, ironically. She had a pathetic password, so I wasn't too surprised. The upside to the story was that we contained it rapidly, and now she actually USES keepass for all her passwords. Woot! Thanks mister Romanian hacker dude.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
    1. Re:This happened to my significant other by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1, Funny

      She had a pathetic password, so I wasn't too surprised.

      Was it "penis" or "hunter2"?

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:This happened to my significant other by drachenstern · · Score: 4, Funny

      She had a pathetic password, so I wasn't too surprised.

      Was it "cravf" or "*******"?

      I don't understand your post. It appears to have been garbled on the way in. Can you repost?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    3. Re:This happened to my significant other by Zixaphir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The correct term would be coincidentally, not ironically.

      --
      "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds"
    4. Re:This happened to my significant other by Conditioner · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh wow, Slashdot has this cool new feature that masks passwords when you type them in a post !!! check i tout, this is my password: *******

    5. Re:This happened to my significant other by Anarki2004 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      orly?

      Here's my password: Nicefuckentryyoustupidassholethisisslashdothowstupiddoyouthinkweare?

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    6. Re:This happened to my significant other by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Password: This_is_slashdot_and_some_people_really_are_that_stupid***

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:This happened to my significant other by Sique · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's my password: Nicefuckentryyoustupidassholethisisslashdothowstupiddoyouthinkweare?

      Which actually means: "I have never read bash.org."

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    8. Re:This happened to my significant other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome ;)

    9. Re:This happened to my significant other by xtracto · · Score: 2, Funny

      The slashdot feature is really cool, this is why I see:

      orly?

      Here's my password: Whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    10. Re:This happened to my significant other by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      It does the same for social security numbers and debit card numbers.

      Check it out, heres my visa: XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX

    11. Re:This happened to my significant other by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned with what this "Nice fuck entry" is.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    12. Re:This happened to my significant other by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this means nothing to you, but I was posting from my phone and intended to follow up with something in the vein of "hey, that didn't work!" but my phone fails at life sometimes. Though I will openly admit I have never seen that bash website. Now that I read this post I realize there is nothing I can do to save myself. In retrospect, hitting the submit button was a poor decision.

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    13. Re:This happened to my significant other by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      In retrospect, hitting the submit button was a poor decision.

      It always is my friend... it always is.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    14. Re:This happened to my significant other by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Nah, post without caring. THis is the Internet and it's okay to be wrong. I already did.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  5. They have a point by alexborges · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It makes sense bots would use the mobile interface. Its lighter so it uses less bandwidth, so more spam-per-bots == profit.

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:They have a point by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention the security on a mobile device is about as strong as a wet paper bag, I wouldn't be surprised if they managed to infect mobile devices instead of just using the mobile interface.

    2. Re:They have a point by Itninja · · Score: 1

      I wish I could make sense bots. That would be awesome.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    3. Re:They have a point by drachenstern · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's been quite a bit of talk on this lately. See for instance this post at Sophos (not exactly a no-name company) http://www.sophos.com/blogs/sophoslabs/?p=1156

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    4. Re:They have a point by knarf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ah, but you did notice that Sophos is in the business of selling anti-virus software? It should not come as a surprise then that they tell you you need it on your phone. They'd try to convince you you need anti-virus on your washing machine and your microwave.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
  6. Got mine too by gander666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    And I had a pretty secure password. Now it is much more secure.

    I got lucky, noticed the odd activity (from Texas no less) and jumped all over fixing it.

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    1. Re:Got mine too by cosm · · Score: 1

      If you tell me both passwords, I can tell if they are "not secure at all" fairly quickly.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    2. Re:Got mine too by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Yeah but what's weird for me is seeing the ATT traveling through one of the ATT-partner networks coming out of PA. So 99% of my gmail access tends to be from 2 local IP addresses, but the iPhone shows up as a PA geo-IP.

      Go figure.

      Point is, people may not realize that their phone is showing up as coming from somewhere not-local and they'll think they've been had. Well, hopefully this group is smarter than that.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    3. Re:Got mine too by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      old pass: gMALE
      new pass: Eyjafjallajökull

    4. Re:Got mine too by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      But you'll need his credit card and SSN as well.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    5. Re:Got mine too by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I know several people whose mobile phone access shows up as coming from Texas, though they don't live in Texas. Google just uses someone's geolocation database, but carriers like AT&T don't have to follow that... for a while my friend thought his account had been hacked as well, but it was repeatable - clear the list of sessions, then connect from his phone, and a Texas entry would show up.

      Have you checked whether that was the case for you?

    6. Re:Got mine too by gander666 · · Score: 1

      Yep, and nope, it wasn't the phone connection. The phone connects via IMAP, and its connections all source from my home state (when I am not traveling). The TX connections were POP3 (I do not ever use POP3) and had odd times of access.

      my only sin was that I haven't cycled the gmail password in a couple of years (lazy). Now it is a randomly generated 20 character password from KeePass. Took me 10 minutes to memorize it.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    7. Re:Got mine too by gander666 · · Score: 1

      Well, that isn't my only sin, but the only related one... :-)

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    8. Re:Got mine too by wcoenen · · Score: 1

      Do you use this "pretty secure password" on multiple accounts, other than gmail I mean?

    9. Re:Got mine too by Jahava · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This type of thing happened to a friend of mine. At 1 in the morning I got an e-mail from him advertising Viagra. After some decent analysis we concluded that his illegal copy of Windows 7 was probably to blame. My belief is that the ISO came with a rootkit gratis.

      I'm writing this half as a "me-too" and half as a note of caution ... illegal operating system downloads are probably the easiest way someone can infect you. If you're running under such a configuration, I'd re-evaluate the cost ... or consider a better option :)

    10. Re:Got mine too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually laugh when I read crap like this but this did happen to me. It appears someone sent spam to everyone in my address book. What's funny is I use a good password and I watch where I surf. I also don't check my mail via any Google Apps or even the web; I strictly IMAP from my non-jail broken iPhone as well as TBIRD.

      I have changed my password since it happened but something is definitely going on at Google. I almost feel like my account wasn't compromised so to speak, it's almost like someone administratively logged in, did some dirty work, and then left.

      What's odd on their 'Details' page is one IP I don't recognize:

      Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com
      Address: 8.8.8.8

      Name: 166-205-140-229.mobile.mymmode.com
      Address: 166.205.140.229

      I don't do any third party checking nor check my gmail on mobile other than my iPhone which uses my wireless although perhaps if mymmode.com belongs to ATT, it's possible it was on Edge.

      Either way, something definitely happened at Google and wish I knew what. Makes you feel violated, actually.

    11. Re:Got mine too by Fishbulb · · Score: 1

      Mine also had one from TX. Isn't there a big spamhaus in TX?

    12. Re:Got mine too by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, so I see you're trusting the security of the cloud?

      Thank you, i'm here all week!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    13. Re:Got mine too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any illegal software (warez) can be a very effective way to compromise your system. If you want your computer to be connected to the Internet, do not install illegal software on it.

    14. Re:Got mine too by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Add more slashes and dots.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  7. Very true. by T+Murphy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can verify this trend. Several of my aunts have switched to Gmail lately, decreasing the spam I get from Hotmail/Yahoo and being replaced by Gmail-based spam.

    1. Re:Very true. by Lavene · · Score: 1

      I can verify this trend. Several of my aunts have switched to Gmail lately, decreasing the spam I get from Hotmail/Yahoo and being replaced by Gmail-based spam.

      I have turned to a whitelist policy when it comes to Gmail. All @gmail.com e-mails go directly into the trash unless I have witelisted that particular address...

    2. Re:Very true. by Blackbrain · · Score: 1

      Doesn't help in this case. I've had two friends get compromised in the last week. In both cases, since I was in their address book, I got V1agra spam from their accounts. The messages were from legitimate white listed Gmail addresses sent from legitimate Google servers.

      --
      Where would we be if Wheel had hid her round rock in a cave instead of showing everyone how it rolls?
    3. Re:Very true. by Lavene · · Score: 1

      Doesn't help in this case. I've had two friends get compromised in the last week. In both cases, since I was in their address book, I got V1agra spam from their accounts. The messages were from legitimate white listed Gmail addresses sent from legitimate Google servers.

      Duh! Of course... And I even read TFA! Guess I forgot to connect my eyes to my brain.

    4. Re:Very true. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Did you know what Microsoft is running a Beta program where you can get $200 for inviting other people? I only just found out from my mum.

      You'd think that, being a /. reader, I'd be pretty well informed of beta programs. Especially ones which pay you. Who'd have known...

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  8. actual problem is using the same password by pikine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apparently this happened to someone I know. She created a third-party web account (in her case, I think it's LinkedIn), entered her Gmail address, and used the same Gmail password for that account. I had to remind everyone I know that some websites *always* check to see if they can log into your e-mail with the password you supplied. Or it could be that the third-party account database was compromised. Either way, always use a different password. A lot of websites apparently store password in clear text, or in non-salted SHA1 or MD5 form so you can easily perform an inverse lookup.

    After she changed her password, her account is clean again.

    --
    I once had a signature.
    1. Re:actual problem is using the same password by trapnest · · Score: 1

      I had to remind everyone I know that some websites *always* check to see if they can log into your e-mail with the password you supplied.

      [citation needed]

    2. Re:actual problem is using the same password by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Clearly not all websites do that, it's an exaggeration. It's a damned useful one though, one should always assume it is the case.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:actual problem is using the same password by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which is why I use Password Composer

      Lets say my 'password' (mor of a salt) is hunter2.

      For google.com my password is: 9594ab73
      For facebook.com my password is: e288ff0e

      You don't even need to use that form, sha1 or md5 (or even doubled up) should work fine.

      md5(sha1("slashdot.org"+"hunter2")) should provide an adequately uncrackable password.

    4. Re:actual problem is using the same password by houghi · · Score: 1

      Always using a different password is great, but with many websites and many computers I use (some of them not mine, so things like Xmarks don't work) highly impractical.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:actual problem is using the same password by pikine · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of graph coloring? All you need to do is to ensure that no two related accounts have the same password. Usually, that means you use one password for e-mail, and another password for everything else. You can always use more unique passwords for an account that has sensitive information.

      --
      I once had a signature.
  9. Breaking in? by Itninja · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are they really 'breaking in'? If I leave a post-it on my front door that says 'key under mat', and someone uses that to get into my home, I don't believe that's 'breaking in'. So if I have a Gmail password of 'password123', and my account is compromised, can we call that 'breaking in'. Not really sure if computer crime is analogous in this way. Trespassing maybe...

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Breaking in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's breaking in. The analogy would be if you if left your laptop outside with a desktop background describing how to get into your email. Even then it still may be criminal

    2. Re:Breaking in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      breaking, or more accurately to break and enter does not actually refer to the process of causing damage to enter a property. It is simply the act of breaking or passing through the defined boundary of a house or property you are not supposed to be in. As such you can break and enter a building by walking through an open door.

    3. Re:Breaking in? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      And once again, Slashdot blames the victim.

    4. Re:Breaking in? by mycroft822 · · Score: 1
      Well in my case they certainly did. The password I had been using was "very secure", or whatever their highest rating of them is called, and somehow they got in to my account to send messages. I saw server bounce messages popping up on emails written in Spanish, so I was fairly certain they weren't coming from me. This was around Jan/Feb though, and from TFA:

      The New York Times reported Monday that Google's centralized login system, code-named Gaia, was compromised by hackers in late December.

    5. Re:Breaking in? by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with that analogy is that the vast majority of door locks have complexity equivalent to 'password123'.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Breaking in? by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      No, Itninja blames the victim. If he's going to single out the victim, lets single out the one throwing stones.

    7. Re:Breaking in? by Itninja · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Relax junior. I'm not blaming anyone. Just wondering how 'breaking in' is defined with regards to computer crime. For a home, the crime of 'breaking and entering' has a very specific definition. If the door was unlocked for example, and someone came in, it's not 'breaking in'.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    8. Re:Breaking in? by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Informative

          Is that a reference to the antique method of springs and tumblers which can be easily displaced with a pick and a tensioner, or the fact that most residential locks have up to 6 pins cut to one of ten depths (10^6 combinations or less) or the fact that a bump key will open almost any lock that you may encounter?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Breaking in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The victim wouldn't be getting the blame on Slashdot if this was about Hotmail.

    10. Re:Breaking in? by Zardus · · Score: 2

      Having a weak password is more like having a dinky combination lock on your front door, not like leaving it open. If someone comes up to your house and cracks your $2.98 Walmart combo lock, they're still robbing you.

      Also, how can you call someone who's ID is well over 600,000 lower than yours a junior? It defies all reason! By common sense, DerekLyons is 3 times your age.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    11. Re:Breaking in? by rliden · · Score: 1

      That would probably depend on your current residence. In the United States it *is* breaking and entering if you enter another person's home without permission whether your door is locked or not.

      Your original analogy is shortsighted. Having a simple password is more akin to having an easily copied house key and not permission to enter a domicile. Your condescending belligerent attitude (relax junior) betrays your lack of intelligence and ability to think critically.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame, more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage.
    12. Re:Breaking in? by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My other gmail account just got yoinked and I'm in the process of recovering it. This account is just fine atleast right now. I use alphanumerics mixed with upper and lower case. And a unique pass on each account. Something...odd is going on.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:Breaking in? by plf5403 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My Gmail account was accessed by the Amazon EC2 cloud about a week ago. (http ://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ ) I have an 18 character upper/lower/numeric/special character password so I'm guessing it wasn't a dictionary attack. "Something" odd is definitely going on. I changed the account password as soon as I was alerted to the unusual IP and have been OK since, but I'm watching the access IP's like a hawk now. An no, I don't use this password for any other web site or application.

    14. Re:Breaking in? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I survived only because I had a very-rarely-used account that was my original gmail account, which I used to invite myself to my commonly-used account. It had the critical data - the invitation URL, etc. - that made it easy to get my account back.

      But this is definitely a major break-in - I didn't have any spam posted from my account, but I did get password reset requests from Twitter and Facebook. By the time those had occurred, I had already changed the passwords to all involved accounts.

    15. Re:Breaking in? by Itninja · · Score: 1

      If you consider the term 'relax junior' condescending and belligerent, then I am guessing you are living a very sheltered life. One day, when you're ready, you can buy yourself a legal dictionary and know how B&E are defined. Trust me, it's a bit more complex that what a Google search can give you.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    16. Re:Breaking in? by rliden · · Score: 1

      I didn't Google it and I'm not a lawyer or work with law enforcement. I had this explained to me by the police after a robbery. If the intent is theft you can be charged with burglary; if not, at the least you can be charged with criminal trespass. It may be more complicated, or not, but the bottom line is it's not okay to enter another person's private residence (and it's not limited to private residence) without permission. Blaming someone for having an easily copied key or weak security doesn't and shouldn't imply they are at fault. This is where you original criticism of the victim is weak.

      Here is a definition of "Breaking and Entering" from lawyers.com: Breaking and entering. Here is the definition of privilege from the same source. According to that site those definitions are based on the Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Law. Here is another site that discusses burglary in regards to B&E: Burglary.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame, more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage.
    17. Re:Breaking in? by Itninja · · Score: 1

      So this has come full circle. As I've already said, I was not 'blaming' or 'critisizing' anyone. In fact, nearly my entire original statement was in the 1st person. Maybe I was blaming myself?

      And as your own cited sources point out, if a person uses no force to enter, and no unlawful activity is intended, it's *not* B&E.

      And it certainly *is* okay to enter a persons private residence without permission (as long as zero force is used and your permission has not been revoked by the owner). For example, a landscaper my be working on my yard and need to use the restroom. If he knocks and I don't answer, and opens the unlocked door, he is not committing a crime. I have given implied consent by hiring him to work on my property. I would have had to lock the door to remove any implied consent. Or, if your neighbor leaves his front door swinging open and you suspect something untoward you can legally enter, without permission, to see if everything is okay (but I would recommend you call the cops instead - in case there is a crime in progress).

      But is getting way OT now....I just had a question about computer crime and if it is analogous.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    18. Re:Breaking in? by urieleoc · · Score: 1

      I too had the same access from the Amazon IP address. I also use a relatively (I once thought to be complex) password. Maybe 10+ characters isn't good enough anymore. I've switched to the smash face into keyboard password generation method. Oddly enough, I can't log into gmail anymore and my face looks like a waffle iron.

    19. Re:Breaking in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rorschach: By the way, you need a stronger lock. That new one broke after one shove.

    20. Re:Breaking in? by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a keylogger would be the only (client-side) way to have compromised your password. Do you happen to use flashblock or similar to prevent flash running in the background? AFAIK flash advertisements are the main way flash keyloggers work, so I assume flashblock is a pretty effective way to remove that risk.

    21. Re:Breaking in? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      Do you use any of the number of applications that offer to synch your mobile phone tasks/calendar/whatever with Google Docs? I've seen a lot of those springing up and can't believe that people would be so free with their Google password

  10. Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Android phone (Moto Droid)... curious to see if anybody else that's been compromised has one, too?

    1. Re:Android? by pizzaandwine · · Score: 1

      Another (happier) victim with an Android phone here. Unclear to me whether they accessed via Android or not to me. I'd be quite surprised as I run a quite-tight set of Linux ships. Happy because 2 female friends of mine simply wrote "thank-yous" for the link to herbal viagra. It was worth cleaning up the mess.

  11. All this, and more ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this, and more, brought to you by the "Cloud"®.

    Gotta love that Cloud® thingy, it's way more secure than old fashioned email.

    Convenience kills civilizations, R.I.P., it's already too late for the "Western Posse" so full of narcissism that they can only see profits, and units in a world full of diminishing resources, welcome back to the third world, any day now.

    I'll miss it, but hopefully adapt.

  12. Where are your filters now? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can your filters respond to an avalanche of spam from an increasing number of throw-away email accounts when it is relayed by legitimate email servers? Can your filters handle spam email that changes body, subject, header, relay, and source address? How much time are you putting into these filtering configurations to do that?

    Maybe it is time to start thinking about how to actually address the spamming problem now, instead of just dealing with the spam itself. Your filters aren't going to help you forever...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Where are your filters now? by icebraining · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe it is time to start thinking about how to actually address the spamming problem now, instead of just dealing with the spam itself.

      Except that many did, and those solutions were dismissed because they won't work.

    2. Re:Where are your filters now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently mine can.
      I use gmail.
      Time spent: 0
      False positives: 0
      False negatives: <0.01%

    3. Re:Where are your filters now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what your right. The first time I sent an email by telnet and used a different name/domain name/ip address I couldn't believe how ridiculous the the whole email system is. For crying out loud atleast verifiy the address....

    4. Re:Where are your filters now? by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe it is time to start thinking about how to actually address the spamming problem now, instead of just dealing with the spam itself.

      Except that many did, and those solutions were dismissed because they won't work.

      First, your assertion of "they won't work" is false. Groups have managed to disconnect botnets from their controllers during spam floods, and that does effectively stop spam from being sent. It is far more effective than any filter could ever hope to be at reducing spam-driven network traffic. And when people start pooling their resources to take the proper steps to remove spammers from their profit motives, we will see the real difference.

      And second, are you actually trying to either defend scaling up filters (in an endless arms race) until the end of time, or are you suggesting instead to do nothing at all (which is equally as useful)?

      If people want to actually stop spam, they can't just keep updating filters. Because sticking to filters only increases the cost of spam for everyone.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    5. Re:Where are your filters now? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      First, your assertion of "they won't work" is false. Groups have managed to disconnect botnets from their controllers during spam floods, and that does effectively stop spam from being sent. It is far more effective than any filter could ever hope to be at reducing spam-driven network traffic. And when people start pooling their resources to take the proper steps to remove spammers from their profit motives, we will see the real difference.

      Except that it has been shown to be irrelevant on a long-term basis; it's no less of a cat-and-mouse game than filtering.

      And second, are you actually trying to either defend scaling up filters (in an endless arms race) until the end of time, or are you suggesting instead to do nothing at all (which is equally as useful)?

      No. You said:

      Maybe it is time to start thinking about how to actually address the spamming problem now, instead of just dealing with the spam itself.

      People are not *just* dealing with spam. Many have come up with proposed solutions. Since none has worked until now, filtering is indispensable.

    6. Re:Where are your filters now? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      First, your assertion of "they won't work" is false. Groups have managed to disconnect botnets from their controllers during spam floods, and that does effectively stop spam from being sent. It is far more effective than any filter could ever hope to be at reducing spam-driven network traffic. And when people start pooling their resources to take the proper steps to remove spammers from their profit motives, we will see the real difference.

      Except that it has been shown to be irrelevant on a long-term basis; it's no less of a cat-and-mouse game than filtering.

      That is untrue. When you stop a botnet from sending spam, you making spamming slightly more expensive for the spammer. And when you take more direct proactive economic steps against spam you will do even more to hurt the spammer's bottom line. The only way to get spammers to stop sending spam is to drive them out economically, because the only reason they do it is to make money.

      So no, going after the botnets - and eventually the profit motive itself - is not a cat-and-mouse game. Going for the profit motive itself is the only way that you will drive spammers into a new business. At the end of the day, spammers care only about how much spam they send, not how much gets through. Similarly at the end of the day, someone has to pay for the traffic of all the spam that is sent, regardless of how it is handled in the end. So if you want to make a meaningful difference in the spam problem you need to go after what drives it, rather than just escalating the filtering arms race.

      Maybe it is time to start thinking about how to actually address the spamming problem now, instead of just dealing with the spam itself.

      People are not *just* dealing with spam. Many have come up with proposed solutions. Since none has worked until now, filtering is indispensable.

      Your conclusion can only be supported if you ignore the botnets that have already been disabled and the spam that was not sent as a result.

      If you oppose proactive solutions to spam, that is your own prerogative. Just be aware that filtering will never actually solve the problem, and in the end only ends up directing more of the costs of spam to the consumer directly. Any alternate claim of the benefits of filtering are disingenuous at best or outright lies at worst.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    7. Re:Where are your filters now? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Can your filters respond to an avalanche of spam from an increasing number of throw-away email accounts when it is relayed by legitimate email servers? Can your filters handle spam email that changes body, subject, header, relay, and source address? How much time are you putting into these filtering configurations to do that?

      Mine can. I give every contact a different @myDomain.com address. One gets compromised, I disable that address and give the contact a new one.

      Bonus: I know who compromised my address to the spammers.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    8. Re:Where are your filters now? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Groups have managed to disconnect botnets from their controllers during spam floods, and that does effectively stop spam from being sent.

      Your post advocates a

      (X) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante

      approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

      ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
      ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
      ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
      ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
      (X) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
      ( ) Users of email will not put up with it
      ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
      ( ) The police will not put up with it
      ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
      ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
      ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
      ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
      ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

      Specifically, your plan fails to account for

      ( ) Laws expressly prohibiting it
      ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
      ( ) Open relays in foreign countries
      ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
      ( ) Asshats
      ( ) Jurisdictional problems
      ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
      ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
      ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
      ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
      ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
      (X) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
      ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
      (X) Extreme profitability of spam
      ( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
      ( ) Technically illiterate politicians
      ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
      ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
      ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
      ( ) Outlook

      and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

      (X) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
      ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
      ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
      ( ) Blacklists suck
      ( ) Whitelists suck
      ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
      ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
      ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
      ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
      ( ) Sending email should be free
      ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
      ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
      ( ) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
      ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
      ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
      ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

      Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

      (X) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
      ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
      ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    9. Re:Where are your filters now? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      If you oppose proactive solutions to spam, that is your own prerogative.

      I never fucking said that! What I said it's filtering is indispensable *until* another solution works, and that people *are* coming up with solutions, unlike what you said ("instead of just dealing with the spam itself.")

  13. This happened to a family member . . . by pacergh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And I reviewed her security protocols. She has a Mac and uses Firefox or Chrome exclusively. This leaves out attacks based on Microsoft security holes (un-updated Microsoft installations, etc).

    She visits sites while still logged into Google. I wonder if there is some way to do that. The only other thing I can think is that she used her email address to create an account at a compromised or fake website and used that email account's password as the account password.

    Nevertheless, I can confirm the unauthorized access was through the mobile interface. In fact, the access point was Portugal.

    The only other thing I can think of is somehow her use of Google's software for accessing her email or syncing her calendar through her iPod Touch might have been compromised. Then again, she only connects to the network here. (Unless she left it roaming.)

    On a side note, GMail, by default, does not require an SSL connection. I wonder if anyone who was hacked had their settings set to require that.

    Anyway, the point is that Google's assertions that accounts are compromised is bogus. If my family member's account was compromised, it was because of an insecurity in Gmail. Either browsing while logged into Google, or by not requiring an SSL connection to access Gmail, I don't know -- but I feel confident the insecurity was not the typical social engineering or browser/chat hole.

    As some have said above -- Gotta love the Cloud!

    I think I'll keep predominantly to old-fashioned email. After all, Google went and picked a fight with the Chinese. Maybe it isn't state-sponsored hacking, but that doesn't mean it's not Chinese hacking.

    1. Re:This happened to a family member . . . by trapnest · · Score: 2, Informative

      On a side note, GMail, by default, does not require an SSL connection. I wonder if anyone who was hacked had their settings set to require that.

      This used to be the case, but they've changed now. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/01/google-turns-on-gmail-encryption-to-protect-wi-fi-users/

    2. Re:This happened to a family member . . . by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      I have "always use https" turned, on, and I was hacked. Then again I used a pretty shitty password.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    3. Re:This happened to a family member . . . by bjourne · · Score: 1

      I have posted about it previously, but there are very strong indications that googles account system suffers from one or more bugs. There have been dozens of reports of users who have accidentally been logged into other users accounts. It is definitely possible that crackers and spammers have figured out how to exploit the security holes by now.

      See http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100321162016AAZnwCC, http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=48382, http://www.google.pl/support/forum/p/gmail/thread?tid=13d02f7a7404e5f6&hl=en, http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/youtube/thread?tid=4426cc7a854b727d&hl=en, http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/my-google-account-is-showing-someone-elses-adsense-account.html, http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Docs/thread?tid=65ca8c56386ded1e&hl=en and much more...

    4. Re:This happened to a family member . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it should also be mentioned that it is possible to configure google to force SSL on all connections, at least on custom domains.

      Manage This Domain > Domain Settings > Enable SSL - Automatically enforce Secure Socket Layer (SSL) connections when your users access Gmail, Calendar, Docs, and Sites. Learn more

    5. Re:This happened to a family member . . . by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

      You sound pretty sure that this is a technology problem and that someone in your family could in no way be "one of those people".

      How do you know it wasn't a guessed password? There are bots that hit my server's SSH port all day, trying username/password combinations (denyhosts takes care of them, but then they come back from another address). How do you know that the same isn't happening with Google's email interface?

      With most email accounts, gmail included, you don't even need to guess the username; anyone that sees your email address knows your account name. Guess-work has just been reduced by half.

      I suspect that Google doesn't maintain the same standards of security on the gmail system as I do on my own public-facing systems. I don't have to worry about unlocking millions of legitimate users; they do. I think the security is pretty loose.

      You're thinking big by wondering if she was a victim of a drive-by, network sniffer, or an unpatched security hole. Many accounts to publicly-accessible systems are far easier to break through simpler means.

  14. Happened to one my accounts as well by RootWind · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This happened to a gmail account that I use specifically just to auto-forward e-mails. I never log-in to it since all it does is forward, and it had a pretty secure password. I would imagine a spammer wouldn't just brute-force random accounts?

    1. Re:Happened to one my accounts as well by RootWind · · Score: 1

      This is what was in the details before I changed the password last week:
      Mobile Algeria (41.103.164.236) Apr 14 (6 days ago)
      Mobile Serbia (94.189.168.76) Apr 14 (6 days ago)
      Mobile Saudi Arabia (77.64.47.176) Apr 9
      Mobile United States (TX) (208.54.171.181) Apr 7

      From people describing that they see Texas and Serbia activity. It sounds almost like it's all the same "entity"?

    2. Re:Happened to one my accounts as well by icebraining · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would imagine a spammer wouldn't just brute-force random accounts?

      GMail shows a captcha after a few tries.

    3. Re:Happened to one my accounts as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one I found out about was also from a mobile last Saturday, but in the Ukraine

      Mobile Ukraine (94.179.112.145) Apr 17

    4. Re:Happened to one my accounts as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The captcha is actually without effect, try it, type your pass wrong a few times, then use the correct one without filling the captcha, you'll get in (if they havn't fixed it since i tried it)

  15. Almost, but not really by SpaceGhost · · Score: 1

    As soon as I read this I went to my account, and saw a lot of mobile activity from California. I freaked! Then I had a thought - so I went to my WM6 cell phone and had it synchronize with gmail. Aha! I knew it - my cell phone is really in California. (And some mobile activity may be legit, and the state may be wrong, as I'm in Texas, T-Mobile must route it out there.)

  16. Funny by vikingpower · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A rapid scan shows that most of those who, here on this page AND are complaning about or admitting to having gmail accounts hacked, are within the US. I am in Austria, and know of no compromised accounts whatsoever - friends, acqaintances, etc. etc. Although the Serbian hackers are damn close... Coincidence ?

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Funny by Zardus · · Score: 1

      Probably.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    2. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot's readership in the United States: hundreds of thousands.
      Slashdot's readership in Austria: you.

      I think you can see the problem with your theory now...

  17. Happened to me last week by tylersoze · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah this happened to me last week and had a secure 8 character password made up of random letters and numbers. I'm not sure if it was a hack or maybe I just got sloppy and used that same password on some other site were I also provided my e-mail and they somehow got it that way. I'm not sure if I had the SSL setting enabled because when I went to set it, neither the http or https radio button was set. I had also just written up an automated perl server monitoring script a few days before that would use the account to send an automated message (via SSL) but that could have been coincidental, who knows? All they did was send Viagra spam to all the contacts. I immediately changed the password and also made the security question/answer nonsense since I can remember my damn password. Only check the mail from my Macbook or iPhone.

  18. GMail's Security is Crap by virb67 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gmail's security sucks and it's customer service is non-existent. Try getting Google to respond to your attempts to regain control of your own gmail account after it's been hacked.

    My friend had her gmail hacked recently. The hackers locked her out, changed her private info, and then sent this email to every single one of her contacts:

    "i'm sorry for this odd request because it might get to you too urgent but it's because of the situation of things right now,We are stuck in london right now,we came down here on vacation ,we were robbed, worse of it is that bags, cash and cards and cell phone were stolen at GUN POINT, it's such a crazy experience for us, we need help flying back home, the authorities are not being 100% supportive but the good thing is that we still have our passport but dont have enough money to get on a plane back home, and i need you to loan me some cash just to complete the ticket fee till we are back home to refund it back to you,i'm dead serious about this.hope to read back from you asap."

    The hackers then sat logged-in to her account pretending to e her, and chatted with her contacts via gmail chat begging them to Western Union cash ASAP.

    Over the course of many hours, we tried to regain control of the account via Google's automated system, but we were repeatedly denied. There was no way to contact an actual human being at Google. After a day of pleading on Google forums, control was finally returned to the accounts rightful owner, but the damage was already done.

    Google encourages people to trust gmail with their most sensitive personal data. I think their negligence and lack of response regarding their own products' defects borders on criminal.

    1. Re:GMail's Security is Crap by Kalriath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yet 30 seconds on the phone if you were a Google Apps customer and - BANG! - that email would be back under your control. I guess it's the "you get what you pay for" thing.

      And yes, I do recognise that your personal info and email messages to datamine is in fact worth something (and therefore a form of payment) but I guess Google doesn't.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    2. Re:GMail's Security is Crap by John+Hasler · · Score: 0, Troll

      > Gmail's security sucks and it's customer service is non-existent.

      If you want customer service become a customer. Users of free accounts are not customers. A business's customers are the people who pay them money: advertisers, in Google's case.

      > Google encourages people to trust gmail with their most sensitive personal
      > data. I think their negligence and lack of response regarding their own
      > products' defects borders on criminal.

      You got what you paid for.

      For email (Webmail and POP/IMAP) and Usenet I suggest Newsguy. It's an actual business, not an advertising agency.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:GMail's Security is Crap by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      The problem is that I can't just pay Google to do this for me. My account was hacked last week or so - I would have paid $20 on the spot to speak to a human being to get my account reviewed to assure that nothing was compromised, no emails were sent, and for a password reset keyed to my mobile phone. Instead I had to navigate the hacked accounts form.

    4. Re:GMail's Security is Crap by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

      That is rather crap

      I am, however, delighted to learn that none of my friends would possibly fall for such a scam were my account to be hacked. This is thanks to my past email communications with them; henceforth, I shall cite my ridiculous pedantry as a security measure.

  19. Recovery Options Slim to None by rothstei · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Happened to my spouse. Password was more than eight characters, letters, numbers, etc. but I think her work is the likely vulnerability (these free screen savers are great!) No more of that now, obviously. The awful part was trying to get the account back. Because of Gmail's "Swiss Bank Account" set up, there is no way to prove you are the real user. She lost access to Email, Docs, Calendar. She just kept filling out the form, and getting rejected. Google advises to set a security question, but that was the second thing changed, after the password. Only after filling out the form over and over for 10 days, was she finally judged to be "real", and her password was reset. For the cloud to take off, there has to be a better structure. A local admin structure? If we were going to start using Google products again fresh, I would sign us up for a free Apps domain, and then give us each user accounts. (When I first signed up for free Webmail, not only did I not know my spouse, I had no idea much of our data-lives would eventually be linked to the account.) That way, if anything untoward happens, I can login as admin from home and reset the accounts. Unfortunately, I don't think there's a way to link personal accounts into an Apps set up. Not yet anyway (crossing fingers). My other work around is that I set up a proxy double email account, to which my real address forwards everything. If for some reason I need to read my email from an unsecured computer, I log in to the proxy account, where I can read copies of all my mail. If its compromised, I cut it off from the actual account faster than a zombifying limb. Still not a great solution, because all my mail is compromised, but at least I don't lose control of my email address and the rest of my Google account.

    1. Re:Recovery Options Slim to None by RJFerret · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is why I don't like having the same cookies/login for multiple sites. I use a Yahoo email for Google Calendar and Google Voice for exactly that reason. But this reminds me to download/archive my calendar. (I know someone who lost their gmail account and there calendar went bye-bye too.)

      I wonder if sharing it with another account would insure against that risk?

      In my case, I don't put all my eggs in one basket.

    2. Re:Recovery Options Slim to None by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Crucial take-home message: if you account is ever hacked, having the invitation URL and inviting email address for your invite to GMail will radically simplify the process.

    3. Re:Recovery Options Slim to None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Setting up account recovery via SMS might have helped in this situation as well.

  20. It's happening to quite a few.. by zoid.com · · Score: 1

    I posted the info last night in the thread about someone stealing google's auth code. I don't think it's a dictionary attack. I think it's related to using the password on other sites. Happend to my wife right after setting up a Nike account. No malware detected. I guess it could be fishing sites.

  21. Re:Happy Birthday Adolph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You bastard. I needed this reminder that I share my birthday with one of the lowest life forms ever to have inhabited a human-looking body. Douchebag.

  22. i got more spam at my non-google account by n3v · · Score: 1

    although i also recently started getting Nigerian offers for my craigslist posts from ppl with gmail accounts..

  23. compromised by echostorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I seem to have been compromised by Chinese mmorpg gold farmers. They even send their sent mail to the trash, which I find interesting. They have sent over 15 emails already in the past 4 hours advertising the site: www.Mmop.com from ip 58.20.79.212. What is most interesting about this is the fact that the password on this account isn't exactly what I would call easy to guess, and has to have been lifted from another site or source.

    1. Re:compromised by ActionDesignStudios · · Score: 1

      Interesting, this same thing happened to me today (from the same exact IP address). I saw an access from China earlier today from when I was on an airplane. They seem to have accessed my account via POP3 (I don't use POP3, but had it inadvertently turned on) -- they sent a bunch of spam mail to myself which was automatically thrown in the trash due to a filter I set up specifically to get rid of chinese gold spam.

  24. /me too by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    happened to me on sunday. and six other friends. 25 people i know since sunday have gotten hit as well.

    obnoxiously there's no way to report the incident to google. all the help stuff is self-serve and the "send feedback" link is a closed beta.

    i had a 28 character password of numbers, letters (upper and lower case) and punctuation that I only used for gmail, so it's highly doubtful they were able to guess at that.

    somehow i feel like this is linked to the theft of their security software

    1. Re:/me too by DKalkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      obnoxiously there's no way to report the incident to google. all the help stuff is self-serve and the "send feedback" link is a closed beta.

      It's irritatingly hard to find, but there is a way to report it. http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=50270 My significant other's account got hijacked yesterday and Google did react less than half an hour after we filled out the form.

    2. Re:/me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Instead of starting my own me too I'll just respond to one. I was hit as well. Incidentally, it was on a gmail account I go to paranoid lengths to keep secure. It was on my gmail account I specifically use for my online banking, broker account, etc. I've never sent a single email on it. The password was 20 characters long of random characters, letters, and upper and lower case. The password was not in any way related to any other password I use. Also, I only ever log into this account from an old, tightly secure linux box that I use only for paying bills online and accessing electronic banking--never for general web browsing or anything else at all. I disable wireless on every computing device I own. I have never shared my password either or written it down. Most people say I go to paranoid lengths with computer security and even I was hit. I really have no idea how I was hit. I even use ad block, no script, flash block, and always type in the URL to any site I go to on that box.

    3. Re:/me too by uwmlml · · Score: 1

      Same. I had a secure log in, then Tuesday I got hacked. Did all the measures Google recommends plus a few more, then got hacked again Sunday.

    4. Re:/me too by Dragee · · Score: 1

      Well, you've eliminated every "user-error" vector I can think of, except one. What were your password reset settings on the account? I'm guessing that with the rest of your measures, you didn't have an easily-guessable answer, but I'm curious.

      --
      dragée (n): a sugarcoated nut
  25. Huh? Why the need to break in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't these guy realize gmail accounts are free? Who hires these guys?

  26. Interesting choices in software by griffinme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the page where Google talks about keeping your account secure....
    "We can tell you, though, that trying all of these programs often makes a difference, as does having the latest versions.

            * Google Pack - Norton Security Scan, Spyware Doctor
            * Kaspersky Free Virus Scan
            * Spybot Search and Destroy
            * Lavasoft Ad-Aware
            * MacScan"

    Norton is not part of the Google pack. Besides, when did it become a good idea to run more then one anti-virus? I always thought that was a good way to cause problems with them fighting each other over a virus.
    From the Google Pack page...

    "Learn more about Google Pack Software

            * Google Chrome Web Browser
            * Google Apps
            * Google Earth
            * Google Toolbar for IE
            * Spyware Doctor with Anti-Virus
            * Google Desktop
            * Picasa
            * Adobe Reader
            * Firefox with Google Toolbar
            * Google Talk
            * Skype
            * RealPlayer"

    What is interesting is that it includes Chrome and Firefox. It is nice to see them recommending Spybot. It has long been a favorite of mine that seems to have lost some of its popularity over the past year or two. On the other hand, they have RealPlayer in the Google Pack and I have despised them for ages.

    --
    Is he strong? Listen bud, He's got radioactive blood.
  27. Keepass And Complex Passwords by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    I have found that my Google Account password is my most important password. Not only does it have my Gmail since 2004, it also has my Calendar, Voice, Documents, and Checkout. It's pretty freaking terrifying. Interesting question: do I need to split it up amongst different providers? Putting your eggs in one basket is a pretty stupid idea but having everything together is so freaking convenient. Ugh.

    Anyway, I use Keepass. I have a 60 character password with symbols, letters, numbers, and the like. That means that I cannot use my Gmail account on public computers that do not have the Keepass software and my password database, but that forces me to keep my discipline. I literally cannot log into my email away from a computer or device that I own.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  28. GMail has always had extremely lax security by green1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although this isn't directly related to this particular occurrence, I think Google has some serious security issues to deal with on the entire gmail platform. I am a forum admin, and I find that the vast majority of spammers who sign up for accounts do so with a gmail account. most of these appear to be bots, they are only marginally slowed down by our captcha, so I suspect they have no trouble with google's either. The fact that such a large percentage of the spam comes from accounts set up through gmail tells me that spammers find it to be the easiest email system to break in to with automated tools.
    If I had the option I would simply ban all registrations from gmail accounts, it would eliminate the vast majority of our forum spam. Unfortunately though too many of our legitimate users also use gmail accounts.

  29. Re:Happy Birthday Adolph by aquila.solo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Happy birthday, AC!

  30. This is why by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 1

    This is why I randomly generate all my important passwords.

    --
    'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
  31. a couple of thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my thoughts are along the lines of "password recovery" compromises
    1. your main password should be sick complex and written down
    2. with any "password recovery" questions should you should choose one where you can put in a real password and not simply choose an option from a drop down list, the password should be even more difficult than your main password, destroy all copies thereof after entering it into the system including clearing the cache(don't write it down)
    3. never give google your phone number since they consider it a viable form of id for password recovery and can be spoofed (or a phone company bot-net master can request your password)

    i wish there was a true "no password recovery" option, but till there is that's the best improvisation i can think of

  32. happened to my better half by outdated · · Score: 2, Interesting

    she clicked on a link sent by one of her friends, and it asked for her gmail password, which she duly filled in.
    Luckily for her, she was online on gmail when the hacker started sending mails and phishing links to her other friends,
    and we immediately changed the password, and forced signed out all other sessions [yes, that little feature on gmail recent login details came in handy.]

    The account is safe now, and more importantly.. she learned her lesson, not to give away her passwords to any random site.

  33. google has been breached by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    I feel like this may be linked to the theft of their security software. Or else maybe a breech from the way past that someone has decided to jump on. Long gone mad employee or something could also be the blame. From what I have read from others that were breached, it does not matter the complexity or age of the password, you still get breached. So something fishy is definitely going on here. I guess it is safe to say that if you have a gmail account it is not safe, and you should check it everyday.

  34. screw you users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's surprising people here at slashdot are not defending google.

    as it's motto do no evil, it's not their fault. it's the user's fault. it's never google's. screw you.

  35. Mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine was hacked about a week ago; I chalked it up to a weak password.

  36. calendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all google services should only work via SSL, this is not the case at the moment so even if I use https on gmail, it doesnt mean calendar will only open on https for me! this is probably how they sniffed all the passwords so far :/

  37. I got hit Tuesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My password is a mix 8 letters and numbers I only use for gmail. Spam was sent out from my contacts in groups of 10. Each group of ten got a different link to somthing.spaces.live(dot)com. I caught it an hour after I started getting return dead addresses and immediately changed my password and password retrieval question. I went over my filters to make sure none were changed and also checked forwarding and pop access.
    Adaware and virus scan showed nothing. As a precaution I saved my contacts to a file and deleted them for now.

  38. Investigation on Google forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interesting investigation work on the Google forums:

    http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/gmail/thread?tid=77127463d8f40cb6&hl=en