Slashdot Mirror


Israel Repeals iPad Ban

SillySilly writes "The ban has been lifted: The Communications Ministry announced Saturday evening that starting Sunday it will allow Apple's iPad tablet computer into the country, following two weeks of confiscations and confusion."

180 comments

  1. What, why? by Peach+Rings · · Score: 0

    If the device violates their wireless standards then why the hell should they allow it to operate in their country?

    1. Re:What, why? by Romancer · · Score: 1, Informative

      The order came from Communications Minister Moshe Kahlon, who apparently hadn?t been appraised of the initial decision to ban the devices due to their wireless specifications.

      Make sense now?

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    2. Re:What, why? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because Israel either (1) realized that it didn't really violate their standards as they thought or (2) realized that their standards are not enforceable because they are incorrectly set. The iPad follows the same Wi-Fi standards as other devices like laptops. Some test after the whole fiasco that the iPad actually emits less than an average US laptop. So if the iPad was in violation then Israel should be confiscating all US made laptops at the border.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:What, why? by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Everything that intentionally emits a wireless signal has to have a prototype sent to the FCC here in the USA. We typically learn of new Apple iPhone/iPad products just before they're submitted to the FCC because once they hit the FCC they'd become public record at that point anyway.

      Israel's complaint was mostly due to a lack of a seal of approval that the iPad now has. Nothing wrong with the device, just need to show one to the approved lab and pay the fee.

    4. Re:What, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean Chinese made. The only thing exported from stateside these days are Britney Spears videos.

    5. Re:What, why? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean Chinese made. The only thing exported from stateside these days are Britney Spears videos.

      I think her kids are also locally sourced... but I don't follow that stuff too closely because, hey, none of it's spilling my direction..

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    6. Re:What, why? by wmac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And are we going to discuss this matter for each of the 188 countries or at least 50 of them?

      How important is the small market there that this is being discussed all over the internet?

    7. Re:What, why? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0

      Here's what you should do. Post a story explaining how Israel's policy of confiscation is perfectly fine.

      This is a user-driven site, and if you think that you aren't getting enough balance, it's up to you to provide it.

    8. Re:What, why? by mpoulton · · Score: 4, Informative

      We typically learn of new Apple iPhone/iPad products just before they're submitted to the FCC because once they hit the FCC they'd become public record at that point anyway.

      Actually the FCC will handle equipment testing and acceptance confidentially. The process takes quite some time (months) so confidential testing and processing helps prevent early disclosure of products. Also, many devices like the iPad do not require new certifications because they will simply integrate a pre-existing radio module that has already been though the process.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    9. Re:What, why? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you believe that, this Jon Stewart movie is a must-watch. Besides being hilarious, it points out the obvious fact that the best way to fix the trade deficit is to improve the standard of living in other countries.

      --
      Qxe4
    10. Re:What, why? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      once they hit the FCC they'd become public record at that point anyway.

      You can actually pay extra to the FCC to have them keep it a secret until the product is released. Apple doesn't trust the FCC to be able to keep a secret, so they do announce the products before sending them to the FCC. And frankly they don't trust the FCC for a good reason: the FCC really can't keep a secret, someone will get a secret picture of it or something.

      --
      Qxe4
    11. Re:What, why? by adolf · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Gosh. If it were that easy to keep things quiet with the FCC, you'd have thought that Apple would've known about it.

      Instead, we get this.

      Hmm.

    12. Re:What, why? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Everything that intentionally emits a wireless signal has to have a prototype sent to the FCC here in the USA.

      That's only if you plan on using it in the USA, without a licence that makes it exempt from FCC approval. A lot of phones available in Europe aren't FCC-tested, because there's no point shipping them to the US since they don't have the infrastructure to use them.

    13. Re:What, why? by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, apparently you didn't read my post, because I explained why Apple doesn't go for the secrecy option (that is, the FCC has trouble keeping secrets even when they try. If you don't remember, Amazon's Kindle was revealed from the FCC even though they went for the extra secrecy protection). Apple reveals their products before the file at the FCC.

      --
      Qxe4
    14. Re:What, why? by adolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow. You're right. I didn't actually read your post.

      Please allow me to retract my previous statement, and insist that the immediate unavailability of vodka combined with a fright of the forthcoming Monday must have clouded my vision and thoughts.

    15. Re:What, why? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

      Israel's complaint was mostly due to a lack of a seal of approval that the iPad now has. Nothing wrong with the device, just need to show one to the approved lab and pay the fee.

      Are you sure? Name another WiFi device that Israel prohibited personal imports of.

      Is it not possible that the reason this WiFi device was singled out for prevention of personal importation a day or two after Apple delayed the international release is because the authorized Apple importer for Israel is well-connected within the Israeli government?

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    16. Re:What, why? by MrNonchalant · · Score: 0

      ...then Israel should be confiscating all US made laptops at the border.

      Or shooting them?

    17. Re:What, why? by nmg196 · · Score: 0

      > Nothing wrong with the device, just need to show one to the approved lab and pay the fee.

      RTFA. The article is about Israel not America. America's FCC is therefore irrelevant as it is not an international body. Most countries outside the USA do not care about the results of any FCC test results.

    18. Re:What, why? by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

      This question baffled me too until I read a Jerusalem Post article.

    19. Re:What, why? by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it was meant to be hyperlinked http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=173945

    20. Re:What, why? by mallydobb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Another thought to consider it to figure out who is responsible for importing Apple products into that country...

      Shimon Peres - Israeli President, Chemi Peres - son of Israeli President who happens to run iDigital, iDigital - Apple's Israeli distributor

      If you're prone to think such thoughts it appears that there would an ulterior motive ($$) for the ban on the iPad. I live in Beirut and the iPad has been here for a couple of weeks now, but the prices are astronomical, they're basically double of what the US retail price is. Best as I can figure is that people are purchasing them from the US and shipping them over to Lebanon. Add on VAT and import fees and double the price so a profit is made and you get as 16GB model for just over $1,000 USD. I almost gagged when I heard the cost for the 64GB model. I am not sure when the iPad will officially make it to Lebanon through the handful of shops that retail Apple products but I sincerely hope the prices go down when it does.

      --
      --- b2b.mallaidh.org | www.mallaidh.org | www.kidsalive.org/article/kahlil-pfaff/
    21. Re:What, why? by youn · · Score: 1

      Nah, apple prefers announcing products by forgetting prototypes in a bar :)... like they did with the 4G prototype :)

      --
      Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    22. Re:What, why? by Bakkster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, many devices like the iPad do not require new certifications because they will simply integrate a pre-existing radio module that has already been though the process.

      While this can happen, depending on the enclosure of the device the FCC can still elect for full testing. You still need to submit, and they can approve purely on similarity, but all the little metal bits can cause a compliant radio to become non-compliant. Think of a parabolic reflector, and that's a simple way to make a compliant device non-compliant.

      I'm pretty sure that with Apple's R&D budget and their limited space, the iPad probably didn't use an off-the-shelf radio module.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    23. Re:What, why? by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that won't just fix trade deficits, but ease rampant immigration issues, and mitigate the likelihood of conflicts. Happy people are less likely to move somewhere else, or start fights.

    24. Re:What, why? by delinear · · Score: 1

      By "the approved lab", I think he meant whatever the local equivalent certification body happens to be.

    25. Re:What, why? by delinear · · Score: 1

      Actually I think this is an ad-driven rather than user-driven site. Unfortunately "man bites dog" will always sell more clicks than "dog bites man", you're unlikely to see true balance while salacious stories generate more revenue, though admittedly it's better than a lot of what else is out there.

    26. Re:What, why? by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      > So if the iPad was in violation then Israel should be confiscating all US made laptops at the border.

      Jokes on you.. I don't think there are any laptops made in the US, then again, neither is the iPad

      [Yeah, I'm sure there is probably at least 1 brand that IS actually made in the US.. if you're reading the above line and getting upset, you need to find something better get worked up over]

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    27. Re:What, why? by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Well, you need to make me happy by giving me 25% of your wealth. I guess since you believe in the spread_the_wealth_around philosophy you won't have any problem with my request.

      If you do, I'll petition Obama to make you give me your wealth. He likes taking wealth from one person and giving it to someone else. He calls that charity on the part of the person from whom he takes money. So, I want him to make you charitable, whether you like it or not.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    28. Re:What, why? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You seem to have jumped to the conclusion that 'trade' is equivalent to 'spreading the wealth.' This is an unfortunate connection to make, because trade actually makes both sides richer, it gives them both something they want more in exchange for something they want less. Improving the standard of living around the world is not charity.

      --
      Qxe4
    29. Re:What, why? by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      You're right it's not charity. It's not trade either, when the jobs used to be American jobs. It's stealing jobs from the citizens of the US and then giving them to the citizens of another country. It's enriching a citizen of another country at the expense of your own citizens. It's enriching another country at your own country's expense. Seems pretty self-defeating to me. Bankrupting yourself to "help" someone else is never a good thing. It's irresponsible at best.

      That was the point of my post. What socialists see as "charity" isn't charity. Charity is the generosity that lives in the heart of the individual doing the giving. A third party taking money from your pocket, and/or mine, and giving it to someone else isn't charity. When it's the government doing it, it's theft at the point of a gun.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    30. Re:What, why? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yawn. Go read a book about economics. International trade always balances itself out in the end, and in the end creates more jobs for both sides, all throughout history. And there have always been protectionist alarmists such as yourself, who lacked understanding of basic facts, and they've always been wrong. Jobs always move.

      For an introduction to reality (assuming you are the kind of person who likes to educate himself), check out the Smoot-Hawley Tariff act. In the short term it seemed like a good idea, as production in the US increased it protected US jobs, but in the not-so-short term it was horrible and was one of the contributing factors to the length of the great depression.

      --
      Qxe4
    31. Re:What, why? by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Yawn, FDR's social justice policies had more to do with extending the Great Depression than any tariff. IOW's, massive increases in government size, spending and increased taxes hurt the economy more than anything else.

      And, no, jobs don't decide to move. Organizations decide to move jobs based on greed, and the government makes it easy for them.

      And, yes, our country is in fine economic shape. We only have approximately 1/5 of our workers without jobs. Ah, just a drop in the bucket. No big deal according to you.... Who needs an employed workforce? We'll just sell our products to those people who don't have any money....

      I say that's a whole lot of people not buying anything other than what's needed to survive. The engine that makes the economy go is broken. Why? At least in part because greedy idiots thought they could make more money for themselves by sending the fuel for the US economy's engine out of country. Mortgage crisis? In part because the jobs to pay for those mortgages went to some other country.

      Yup. Real great thinking. Let's cut off our nose to spite our face.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
  2. Well you know what they're like by jpmorgan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well you know what the nation of Israel is like, they're always initially suspicious of new tablets. But they come around in the end.

    1. Re:Well you know what they're like by countertrolling · · Score: 5, Funny

      This one might have the last five commandments..

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    2. Re:Well you know what they're like by masshuu · · Score: 5, Funny

      The 5 Apple Commandments.

      1. Thou Shall Worship the Apple, Only the Apple, and Nothing but the Apple.
      2. Thou Shall Only use the App Store, and reject any alternatives like unlocking.
      3. Thou Shall Reject any alternatives, including, but not limited to Microsoft.
      4. Thou Shall Bow in Ignorance, and Believe that Apple is always ahead in the game.
      5. Thou Shall Down Mod this any any posts that violate any of the above Commandments.

      --
      O.o
    3. Re:Well you know what they're like by countertrolling · · Score: 1, Informative

      (Score:0, Offtopic)

      Damn moderator.. I was so hoping I wouldn't have to ruin the joke

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    4. Re:Well you know what they're like by Superdarion · · Score: 1

      5. Thou Shall Down Mod this any any posts that violate any of the above Commandments.

      Your score of 4 suggests that the sinners surpass the pure ones by a margin of 4!

    5. Re:Well you know what they're like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like Israel was the only nation to make a big no-importing stink over the uncertified status...

      by Sveinjoe

    6. Re:Well you know what they're like by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      1. There's only one international airport so it's easy to enforce
      2. The government and their departments have no problem with looking like complete fools (it's like a daily occurrence)
      3. Oh yeah, and the president's son is an investor in the local Apple distributor (iDigital)

      It's probably some mix of those 3 ingredients but I'm not sure in which proportions.

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    7. Re:Well you know what they're like by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      I love OSX, but this kind of shit makes me a bit less inclined to buy a new Mac. I have too much Mac software here to migrate easily, but to others, I usually recommend Linux.

    8. Re:Well you know what they're like by keeboo · · Score: 1

      Looks like a banana republic to me.

    9. Re:Well you know what they're like by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      Kind of but banana republics have better duty free stores and more bananas.

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
  3. Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by strredwolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    At least they finally got it tested so it proved what it said. Isralies are picky to a fault.

    But you can't ship 'em in yet. Limit's only one per person, so no gifting yet.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Israel has been doing this "War on Terror"(TM) stuff for many years... and as a result some things that we consider harmless are "security threats" until they're proven otherwise. Anything that could emit a wireless signal could trigger something harmful, so there has to be limits on those things.

    2. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by caseih · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And of course things that we (the TSA anyway) consider security threats--like water bottles, and nail clippers with a pointy file on airplains--are seen as harmless to them. I think maybe they understand some things about terrorism that we don't.

    3. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by cbreak · · Score: 1

      Like cellphones? So there are no cellphones in Israel?

    4. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Anything that could emit a wireless signal could trigger something harmful, so there has to be limits on those things.

      I appreciate what you're saying about the Israelis having tighter anti-terrorism security measures, but a few things:

      1. It's absurd that the WiFi on an iPad (or any computer) would be a threat in numbers, but not in the singular.
      2. Anything with metal and electricity, or even just a magnet, can emit a wireless signal.
      3. The iPads were confiscated at customs. The plane has already landed.

      Without further evidence, this wasn't a "war on terror" thing, it was a standard regulatory thing. In spite of common(?) misconception, the Israeli government addresses issues that have nothing to do with terrorism.

    5. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Just like the USA, "they" can place taps on cell phones.

    6. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      As an Israeli I assure you, the "national security" reasons given by the ministry were nothing but poor excuses after the fact. Just like in america (or even more so) words of "security" are just the joker cards used by the government to confuse and distract. I also don't buy the conspiracy theories about corruption related to this case.

      The story, as I understand it, is a very simple story about a bureaucracy making a wrong decision, finding excuses to that decision and finally backs down after what it perceived as a sensible damages control strategy.

      The order of events ( in my opinion ):
      1) The custom personnel didn't know how to handle imports of the iPad.
      2) They contacted the office of ministry of communications.
      3) The incompetent office tried to obtain official details and specs of the device, failed to do so and decided to default to banning the device until further notice. When ignorant, Israeli bureaucracy always defaults to the lazy option and takes the "better safe than sorry" stance, whatever the cost is to the individual.
      4) Headlines rightfully ridiculing the decision popped up in Israeli online news sites, followed by a world wide criticism and ridiculing.
      5) The office understood the mistake but tried any tactic not to loose face. Then all the stupid excuses came out: the babble about national security, about the office protecting the convenience of the local populace, the lack of compliance from iDigital (apple products importer in Israel) and more excuses. Nothing more than "security", "what about the children" and "look a chubaka!" to confuse and distract.
      6) The office waits awhile for everything to settle down and lifts the ban with remarks about "sophisticated lab testing" etc. Sounds very scientific. Very hi-tec. I'm glad we have such sophisticated people in our government.

    7. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think maybe they understand some things about terrorism that we don't.

      Yes. The Israelis are interested in providing security; the TSA is only interested in providing security kabuki theater.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    8. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like the USA, "they" can place taps on cell phones.

      I only place taps on my shoes.

    9. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And of course things that we (the TSA anyway) consider security threats--like water bottles, and nail clippers with a pointy file on airplains--are seen as harmless to them. I think maybe they understand some things about terrorism that we don't.

      Different culture, different superstitions. Do not seek deep logic into either nation's arbitrary pain points. We laugh at people in the past for fearing broken mirror or throwing away salt would bring them a bad fortune. Today we fear nail clippers and mobile gadgets will do it. As any superstition, it's remotely based on some real rare occurrence or situation that has been overblown and distorted beyond recognition.

      And some still think modern people are logical.

    10. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes. The Israelis are interested in providing security; the TSA is only interested in providing security kabuki theater.

      On the contrary, it is Bunraku. They entertain you with puppets, all the while saying "pay no attention to what the men in the black suits are doing".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was a bunch of greedy fsckers that wanted iPads. Now that all of the greediest have free iPads, they're allowing them in the country now.

    12. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel has been doing this "War on Terror"(TM) stuff for many years... and as a result some things that we consider harmless are "security threats" until they're proven otherwise. Anything that could emit a wireless signal could trigger something harmful, so there has to be limits on those things.

      Oh please. As a veteran Israeli, the recent ban has nothing to do with the "War on Terror"(TM). It has to do with the fact that the Ministry of Communication boys are bumbling fools. No one here ever attempted to excuse the ban as part of a security policy.

    13. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your explanation sounds very plausible. More and more I believe that most government lunacy is the result of governments and government agents attempting to save face above all else.

    14. Re:Ban lifted, but limited to one per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clarifying. I knew the "banana republic" is the most likely explanation.

  4. Supply problems... by LostCluster · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apple doesn't have enough supply of the iPad to do a worldwide release because they're delaying American shipments and imposing purchasing limits on large buyers. As a result, they didn't do international standards testing because they aren't selling it everywhere yet. It looks like Israel was the only nation to make a big no-importing stink over the uncertified status... so really this Apple cleaning up a problem caused by excessive demand, something they should be used to by now.

    1. Re:Supply problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Apple cleaning up a problem caused by excessive demand, something they should be used to by now.

      Eh? Hard to imagine Apple wouldn't want, and tries to achieve, the excellent press of being unable to meet initial demand. This isn't like typical Christmas product sales, where shortages just means your potential customers go buy a competitor's product instead.

  5. No more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...iBan.

  6. Didn't necessarily violate, untested by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    If the device violates their wireless standards then why the hell should they allow it to operate in their country?

    It shouldn't. But it doesn't.

    The whole issue was that it was untested. That was it. As with any bureaucracy, rules must be obeyed even if in the end the result is the same.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. Tablet computer by aldld · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple's iPad tablet computer

    I don't really consider the iPad to be much of a computer.

    1. Re:Tablet computer by Quarters · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, ok, then, I guess that's settled. Since you seem to be in charge of determining what an electronic device with a CPU, RAM, I/O, and a display is called, how should we refer to it?

    2. Re:Tablet computer by countertrolling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Toy..

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    3. Re:Tablet computer by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 1

      Well, ok, then, I guess that's settled. Since you seem to be in charge of determining what an electronic device with a CPU, RAM, I/O, and a display is called, how should we refer to it?

      As a tablet.

      --
      'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
    4. Re:Tablet computer by neonKow · · Score: 1

      Your phone has all of that too.

    5. Re:Tablet computer by pinkj · · Score: 3, Funny

      It does more than an TRS-80 and that was a computer, wasn't it?

    6. Re:Tablet computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, it doesn't. The TRS-80 was a programmable minicomputer. The apple is as programmable, in general, as my daughter's barbie laptop toy. Sure, HTML5 will fix that, right?

    7. Re:Tablet computer by Zuriel · · Score: 2, Funny

      My *watch* has all that too. And it also won't run Flash. :)

    8. Re:Tablet computer by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      "the apple"? Should I assume you mean the Apple iPad or all Apple products? Because I can tell you right now that if you buy a mac you not only get the development tools for it (as well as the iPod touch, iPhone and iPad) for free (as you should) but you can also install 3rd party tools if you have some sort of "my gcc must be untainted" thing going.

      But let's say you're talking about the iPad, well it is possible to write programs for it, it's just that the operating system is locked down in a way that requires your applications to be signed in order for it to allow you to install the applications. So it is probably a lot more programmable than your daughter's "barbie laptop toy" (although to be fair I have little knowledge of the state of the art when it comes to Barbie laptop toys, for all I know it runs plan 9).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    9. Re:Tablet computer by JWSmythe · · Score: 0, Redundant

          No, the proper term is buzz word driven sales. Apple has done pretty well there. People need their iMac, iPod, iPhone, and now iPad. All the cool kids have it, so why don't you too?

          I used someone's iPhone, and was generally annoyed with it. I haven't had a chance to play with an iPad yet, but I suspect it'll be like all of the other Apple products I've used since my Apple IIe. It's pretty to look at, but I'll still call my PC based Linux/Windows machine a computer. (I either have one of each or dual boot).

          I was kind of stunned that at one place I worked, they bought several of the x86 Mac's, and went straight out and got their dual boot toy ("bootcamp", if I remember correctly), and used it as a Windows machine. No one could satisfactorily answer the question "Why did you spend more on that than a x86 Windows PC?" If you're going to buy an Apple to use an Apple, why would you make it run like an orange?

       

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    10. Re:Tablet computer by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      No, the proper term is buzz word driven sales.

      Too many syllables. Gotta keep it to three or less. If you can pronounce it while you're drunk, you might have a winner. Personally I see the iPad as nothing more than a iTouch for people that are too vain to buy reading glasses.

      why would you make it run like an orange?

      I like oranges? But seriously, a friend of mine did precisely that. Just didn't want to have to deal with the changes. Such a shame. On the bright side, the iMacs are probably the best looking Windows machines you'll ever see.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    11. Re:Tablet computer by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

      just that the operating system is locked

      In other words, trivia.

    12. Re:Tablet computer by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      Lets see: Smartphone, navigation device, MP3-Player, media player, internet-enabled TV, ... all of those and more have a CPU, RAM, I/O, and display. ...so what was your point, again?

    13. Re:Tablet computer by StripedCow · · Score: 0

      I don't really consider the iPad to be much of a computer.

      Certainly the iPad is not Turing-complete (because some turing machines will not be accepted in the app store.)

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    14. Re:Tablet computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TRS 80 could be programmed with basic, c, fortran and who know how many others without the owner of the hardware being able to say anything. The ipad is locked kind of like electronic toys.

    15. Re:Tablet computer by pinkj · · Score: 1

      Then how are all these apps being written for it?

    16. Re:Tablet computer by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect it'll be like all of the other Apple products I've used since my Apple IIe.

      Apple IIe can run BASIC programs entered at the keyboard. iPad explicitly cannot.

    17. Re:Tablet computer by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Wow. The discussion mentioned the TRS-80, a Barbie laptop toy, and the Apple iPad. Referring to "the Apple" clearly, and without any doubt (to most, it seems), refers to the Apple iPad, as that's what's being discussed.

    18. Re:Tablet computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That description applies to my microwave...

    19. Re:Tablet computer by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I think I've seen a few too many individuals on teh intarwebs claiming to be experts on Apple products yet they seem to pick names at random ("the apple", "mcintosh", "mac phone" and "small mac" are apparently all names of various Apple products according to these "experts"). If someone claimed to be an expert on IBM/Lenovo desktop/laptop computers yet referred to the Thinkpad series of computers as "ibmpad" and "thinkbook", would you take them seriously?

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    20. Re:Tablet computer by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Ok, I agree with that. If I'm drunk I'm going to call it a toy. ;)

          I understand the change thing. People generally like bigger better things, but they don't deal well with change. But along those lines, I've known people who keep using the same computer til it dies, even though it's ancient. Why? Because they're afraid to even get a new computer.

          And to add a car analogy.. :) A long time ago, I used to spend a good amount of time at an auto repair shop. On occasion people would come in with an old beat up broken car that should have been retired a decade before. They'd be presented with an estimate that was more than the car was worth and would be a very hefty down payment on a new car. One of them once said, "I know what's wrong with this car. I don't know what would be wrong with another car I bought." So, instead of taking several thousand dollars and buying a good used car, they'd spend it on their old piece of junk.

          My ex-wife had a small import SUV, with a book value of $2,800. The transmission went out in it. That transmission was only used in that model, for one model year. It cost just about $4,000 to have the transmission rebuilt. I told her that we could sell this one as junk, and buy a newer one that looked and worked better for the cost of the transmission. I lost, and it got fixed.

          The same has applied to computers. After Win2k and WinXP came out, I found a lot of people still using Win95 or Win98. There was basically no resale value on their computers because they were so old. Even when told that the hard drive was toast, the CD ROM didn't work, and it didn't have enough memory to run anything remotely recent, they'd insist that they wouldn't change.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    21. Re:Tablet computer by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Please re-read my comment. You clearly misunderstood it. When talking about a distinct set, in this case a Barbie toy, an Apple computer, and a TRS-80, saying "the apple" to refer to the only Apple device in the list is perfectly acceptable. It's not strange, and it's not indicative of people misunderstanding or misusing terminology.

  8. Mossad is happy now? by dave562 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Have they confiscated enough of them to thoroughly document them enough to begin the reverse engineering process?

  9. US made laptops? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    US made laptops -- Got a link?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:US made laptops? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    2. Re:US made laptops? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I find it pretty hard to get excited about a computer "made in the USA" when you know pretty much every component in the thing was actually made in China.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:US made laptops? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Intel, AMD and others have fabs in the US. The RAM in my laptop was produced and assembled in the US. I bought it because it was cheap, it's the fourth time I've bought this brand and no problems yet, knock on wood. I don't really understand how something American made can be cheaper, but whatever, I'm happy to vote with my dollars.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:US made laptops? by jimthehorsegod · · Score: 1

      I bought it because it was cheap..... I'm happy to vote with my dollars.

      Yeah but it rather looks as though you're voting for Cheap not voting for US-Made!

    5. Re:US made laptops? by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've given up. Cheap and good is better than country of origin. Although if a product comes from a democratic country I will probably buy that item. Like if it made in India or France or something. But if the American one is cheaper than the French one, I'll buy that.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:US made laptops? by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Hard drives seem to be cheapest in the US and Canada. I believe they're usually manufactured over here?

    7. Re:US made laptops? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the USA, but there are disk manufacturers in Europe, particularly in Poland and the Czech republic. My wife kept a job with such a manufacturer for about 6 months when she and I lived in Poland briefly. Surprised that there was such an operation in Poland, I did some research, finding that many drive manufacturers operate in Europe, not in Asia. Presumably, they can better control the production quality of a device such as a hard disk, while exploiting the low-cost wages of the post-soviet states. Not that I should be surprised, many other companies do the same thing, Dell in particular is well-known for this.

    8. Re:US made laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American componets, Russian components - BAH! All made in Tawian!

  10. I swear by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometimes it seems like Slashdot posts stories about Israel for no other reason than to get people to start arguing. Come to think of it, the same goes for Apple.

    Why does anyone need to know this? There's really not much discussion you can have about "this country lets you bring iPads" in, before this whole pages inevitably devolves into endless flaming about 1) Israel's foreign policy and/or 2) how the iPad sucks because it's a closed platform or whatever.

    I'm just saying, it'd be cool if the editors stopped and asked themselves, "Are we posting this because it's important news that people should know, or are we posting it because we want to watch it draw trolls like moths to a flame?". This story is firmly in category 2.

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    1. Re:I swear by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some people travel to Israel for business. It's actually a technological powerhouse, not some godforsaken desert that many think it is.

      So anyone with an iPad would be very interested to know that Israel was stealing these computers at the borders.

      Sure, there is some levity about Israel's foreign/domestic policy, but the crux of the matter is that Israel was taking stuff that didn't belong to it in the name of "safety". That's pretty important to anyone who might be affected, don't you think?

    2. Re:I swear by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sometimes it seems like Slashdot posts stories about Israel for no other reason than to get people to start arguing. Come to think of it, the same goes for Apple

      No maybe about it, Slashdot does post stories--and not only about Israel--for no other reason than to get people to start arguing. In fact, I've learned that if I purposely word a submission in a way that will stir up a controversy, it's much more likely to get used. I did exactly that this past week with a submission about Apple possibly buying ARM Holdings by adding a slightly paranoid-sounding sentence about Apple being "able to control who gets to use the processors (and, more importantly, who doesn't)." Totally unnecessary, but I knew that it would help get the submission chosen, and it was.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people travel to Israel for business.

      LOL bullshit. Most slashdot users are part time employees at Best Buy, entering their sixth year of community college. Sorry, sparky, but you don't get to travel for business if you're making $9/hr.

      ^_^

    4. Re:I swear by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re: Why does anyone need to know this?
      Historically the ipad, its software and hardware do open a few questions.
      Some parts of the world might ask questions beyond interference issues.
      Could slashdot users comment on unique tracking needs?
      How open is Apple OS efforts to a trojan or more passive world wide tracking?
      Would an engineer like a new grey market ipad..

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:I swear by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 4, Informative

      So anyone with an iPad would be very interested to know that Israel was stealing these computers at the borders.

      FWIW, the iPads were not being stolen. The rightful owners could reclaim their property when they exited the country.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    6. Re:I swear by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      They also have surprisingly good food(even if you cannot get a cheeseburger :P) and hot women roaming the country with assault rifles slung around their backs, what more do you need?

    7. Re:I swear by matria · · Score: 1

      Plenty of cheeseburgers. You just have to find the non-Kosher McDonalds. There's one at the central bus station in Netanya.

    8. Re:I swear by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Sorry, sparky, but you don't get to travel for business if you're making $9/hr.

      As a Best Buy employee who is entering his sixth year of community college, I have to prove you wrong. I got an all-expenses-paid trip including a 3-night stay in a hotel and food allowance when I was in charge of the photo lab at another shit-job. Also, I beat you up in high school and get more pussy than you do.

      But what does this all have to do with Israel? Jews are some of the worst customers a retail monkey will encounter.
      +5, informative

    9. Re:I swear by toxygen01 · · Score: 1

      Great, so you have to leave the country to use things you "own". Do I understand it correctly?

    10. Re:I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually most of the restaurants aren't kosher...

    11. Re:I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes it seems like Slashdot posts stories about Israel for no other reason than to get people to start arguing. Come to think of it, the same goes for Apple.

      Yes yes, everybody is out to get you. Isreali tend to be very eager to claim that whenever possible.

      Now that I sufficiently reinforced that notion ... it's really just about the iNews. The fact that it happened in some country or another is secondary. If Isreal had banned random-chinese-noname device, we wouldn't have read about it. If some-other-country would have banned an iProduct, we would have.

      Slashdot somehow has to make it's two iNews per day quota.

    12. Re:I swear by maroberts · · Score: 1

      Probably, but that applies to other countries as well. I suspect that if you tried to import some guns that you own in the US to the UK, you won't be allowed to use them in the UK, and it may be a while before the police let you leave.

      Similarly you can (semi)legally own pot in some EU countries, but I suspect the US may be a little pissed off when you take it through their Customs....

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    13. Re:I swear by HateBreeder · · Score: 1

      Israel was taking stuff that didn't belong to it in the name of "safety".

      didn't belong to it? In the name of saftey? Why do you make these things up?
      The iPad has never passed the israeli communication ministry tests for wireless devices. it's not qualified for use in Israel. Every wireless device MUST pass these tests before it can be admitted into the country. Israel has been doing the same for many different type of cellular phones since forever, but no one gives a shit because they weren't apple products.

      When a wireless device goes to the US, it needs to be approved by the FCC. if it isn't, then it is illegal for use in the US. that simple. no "saftey" reasons, no "terror" reasons. It's just a fucking wireless device that needs to approved first.

      And "taking stuff that didn't belong to it"??? would you say the same when some drug dealer tries to smuggle illicit substances into your country and the government confiscates the drugs? Besides, the iPads were kept in storage until you left the country. You could alternatively ship them back home straight from the border stop.

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    14. Re:I swear by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      When a wireless device goes to the US, it needs to be approved by the FCC. if it isn't, then it is illegal for use in the US. that simple. no "saftey" reasons, no "terror" reasons. It's just a fucking wireless device that needs to approved first.

      Except that in both Israel and the US, this is NEVER enforced for random people coming into the country with random devices. A metric crapload of people from Japan visit with phones that have never been submitted to the FCC and nothing happens. The same goes for laptops going into Israel. Now if you want to sell a device in the country in question, that's a different story, but just bring it in, never a problem.

      The difference here is they were actually confiscating the devices at the border which they don't do with other laptops or devices that have not been approved. Probably this was the result of the iPad looking sufficiently different that it was recognizable to average border guards who knew it wasn't for sale there yet, but that's just speculation. None of the reports to date have a good explanation as to why it was singled out and treated differently.

    15. Re:I swear by HateBreeder · · Score: 1

      The reason it was singled out was because a few visitors were actually trying to pass the devices through customs so that they could legitimately use them in Israel.

      I suspect most of the Japanese visitors to the US don't declare their phones as taxable goods since they have no intent of keeping/selling them in the US.

      People who didn't declare their iPads when entering the country were not specifically searched for iPads.

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    16. Re:I swear by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      People who didn't declare their iPads when entering the country were not specifically searched for iPads.

      No, but those several of those did have them confiscated. This has not been the case with any other laptop I know about.

    17. Re:I swear by HateBreeder · · Score: 1

      This happens all the time with laptops and cell phones. I've had a cellphone confiscated when it was shipped over, friends had laptops confiscated the exact same way.

      Maybe you didn't hear about it because no one cares when an anonymous Taiwanese manufacturer has its products confiscated? But when such a hyped product like the iPad gets confiscated, the fanbois just go mental, filled with self importance they make outrageous claims like Israel would change their policy specifically for the iPad - because it's THAT cool.

      Seriously, this is really not news-worthy and wouldn't make it to a page 50 random headlines section unless crazy apple fanboys were involved.

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    18. Re:I swear by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This happens all the time with laptops and cell phones. I've had a cellphone confiscated when it was shipped over, friends had laptops confiscated the exact same way.

      Wait what? We're talking about it being confiscated at the border when being carried through by an airlines traveller. That's not the same as being confiscated when shipped through the mail, although I've never had that happen either. Seriously, I used to do a lot of traveling and I'm pretty sure my cellphone back in the day only worked in the US and was approved there, but no one ever tried confiscating it. No one I've worked with ever had that problem either and a lot of them went to Israel regularly.

      Do you have anything to back up your claim that other brands of devices are regularly confiscated or is that just your surmise based upon your experience with the mail?

      Maybe you didn't hear about it because no one cares when an anonymous Taiwanese manufacturer has its products confiscated?

      A lot of people care when laptops are being seized at the border, regardless of the manufacturer, because a lot of people cross those borders. I've never heard any fellow road warriors warn about this problem.

    19. Re:I swear by ygslash · · Score: 1

      So anyone with an iPad would be very interested to know that Israel was stealing these computers at the borders.

      FWIW, the iPads were not being stolen. The rightful owners could reclaim their property when they exited the country.

      Well, yeah. After they pay a $12 per day "storage fee".

    20. Re:I swear by HateBreeder · · Score: 1

      As an airline traveller, when you enter the country, you have 2 routes: 1. declare goods for tax purposes 2. nothing to declare

      Generally speaking, if you bought something abroad then you need to go through 1 and pay the appropriate tax.

      If you go through 2, you would normally not be searched. Although, you might be chosen randomly for a search.

      If you go through 1, you need to show all the items that you've bought abroad and pay whatever custom taxes you need to pay.

      Have a look here. The order was given to customs - i.e. only to people who opted to go through route 1.

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    21. Re:I swear by eladts · · Score: 1

      Are there really businessmen using iPads? The iPad is far from being a business oriented computer.

    22. Re:I swear by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      I know several who already own iPads and take them everywhere. A handful more would already have them if not for lack of inventory.

      It's just a big toy, and even grownup men like toys.

    23. Re:I swear by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Seriously thou are drugs and guns the same as what amounts to a touchscreen netbook?

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    24. Re:I swear by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Everytime I went to Israel the entrance was easy, the exit is where they bug you about what you've gotten and where you've been and what you are exporting.

      I never declare anything.

    25. Re:I swear by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Yes, business people are using iPads, my cousin is an airline pilot for a major carrier and he has replaced his work laptop with an iPad.

    26. Re:I swear by hazah · · Score: 1

      That's only because you can't haggle.

  11. iSrahell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Palestinians just need new wireless cards to return?

  12. Very true by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't really consider the iPad to be much of a computer.

    And many don't consider the computer (as we know it) to be much of a tablet.

    The difference is what makes it better, and why they seem to be succeeding when other tablet efforts have come out flat.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Very true by aldld · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Tablets (like the iPad) are generally meant to be used for different things than what I (and most people I know) use a full computer for.

  13. Re:Jews for Nerds! by Beelzebud · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    My advice to you: Be like Hitler, and kill yourself!

  14. Clearly... by Nov+Voc · · Score: 1

    ...following two weeks of confiscations and confusion.

    Clearly, someone didn't feel like just waiting in line for their own, eh?

  15. Its ok. It has a driedel app. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That and the Israelis love a good bribe just like everyone else.

  16. Trolls are not attracted to bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I resent the insinuation that anyone who has something negative to say about Apple or Israel is somehow a troll.

    If you can't have an intelligent conversation about the merits and demerits of a technology, maybe this isn't the site for you.

    We know you love Apple and Israel. But that doesn't magically bestow any extra weight to your opinions.

    So cut it out with ad hominem attacks. If you can't defend yourself, your favorite computer company, or your favorite country with reason and argument, then stay lurking. Because those of us who can attack and defend aren't pulling any punches.

    1. Re:Trolls are not attracted to bait by JackieBrown · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I resent the insinuation that anyone who has something negative to say about Apple or Israel is somehow a troll.

      If you can't have an intelligent conversation about the merits and demerits of a technology, maybe this isn't the site for you

      The problem is that people posts have nothing to due with technology. (Some do but how many post can you get out of Israel now allows the ipad?)

      Instead, we hear about how they are building homes in places we think they shouldn't or how they are murders of innocent Palestinians.

      If you want to bash Israel, at least keep it technology related, but hate does not usually allow one to restrain oneself.

    2. Re:Trolls are not attracted to bait by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am cool with that. But at least the editors could be honest and use a humanity story. There are plenty to choose from.

    3. Re:Trolls are not attracted to bait by matria · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah... like how that iconic picture of the 12-year-old Mohammad al-Dura screaming in terror moments before he was brutally murdered was finally proven to be a staged "Pallywood" production. Or driving the Palestinians out of their homes in Jerusalem. Oh, you mean those Jewish homes purchased over 100 years ago, whose owners the Jordanians drove out, renting the homes to Arabs and holding the rent in "escrow" for the legal Jewish owners? Until the Arabs stopped paying the rent and tried to claim the homes as theirs? And finally got evicted for not paying rent for years? Wish I could live in a rental house and then decide to just stop paying the rent and get to claim title to the house.

      Or how about building some apartment buildings in a Jewish neighborhood of Jerusalem that in no way expands the borders of said Jewish neighborhood? Well, I guess facts really aren't all that much fun, are they? After all, "thousands of illegal settlements driving the Palestinians off their land" sounds a lot more exciting than "Jews legally building apartments in their own neighborhoods".

    4. Re:Trolls are not attracted to bait by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Sure. Post one of those stories and we can talk about it. Posting an iphone story just so we can talk Israel politics is dishonest.

    5. Re:Trolls are not attracted to bait by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      You might be a troll if your idea of infrastructure tends to foot bridges with curiously large abutments.

    6. Re:Trolls are not attracted to bait by matria · · Score: 1

      True. But then, that's often how a conversation goes; starts on one point and segues to something else. The iPad story is legitimate, and receives its share of conversation. Every post has interesting side channels to the conversation.

    7. Re:Trolls are not attracted to bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen!

  17. Re:For chrissakes... by JackieBrown · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    but don't try to pin the innocuous confiscation of iPads on some weirdo paranoid delusion about Mossad.

    That was cute especially since you added your own "weirdo paranoid delusion" to your reply.

  18. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't choose your race. But you choose a religion, if any. Making fun of others because of their beliefs is less worst than making fun of others because of what race or sex they are.

  19. Did that affect non residents ? by Pastis · · Score: 1

    > If your iPad was confiscated by customs officials
    > atBen-Gurion International Airport, you can now
    > pick it up

    Questions:

    * did that affect people travelling to Israel as tourists or just locals returning home with a product from overseas who declared it at customs ?
    * if you were a tourist, was your iPad returned when you left the country ?
    * if not, do you have to go back to Israel to get it returned or can they ship it to you ?

    1. Re:Did that affect non residents ? by Wovel · · Score: 1

      I am sorry that I can not answer, but I did feel compelled to say this: How dare you ask questions relevant to the story!!

    2. Re:Did that affect non residents ? by Superdarion · · Score: 1

      And he didn't even mention how the iPad is closed! Baffling!

    3. Re:Did that affect non residents ? by Phizzle · · Score: 1

      You could simply reclaim your iPad at Customs upon exiting the country.

      --
      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
    4. Re:Did that affect non residents ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it did affect tourists.

      Anyone leaving the country could have his/hers iPad delivered to the plane after boarding, naturally this involved a delivery fee.

      The real reason for the ban had nothing to do with security or radio standards. The official Apple distributor and cellphone companies didn't want to repeat the iPhone fiasco. By the time they've signed their (very ambitious) distribution contracts with Apple every consumer that wanted an iPhone, already had it. It's amazing what you can get away with if you have the right friends.

  20. Re:For chrissakes... by JackieBrown · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Which delusion?.....I don't think you'll find anything delusional about my post. Maybe you need to consider your own biases.

    You just contradicted the post (of yours) I replied to (and quoted) or you are going off-topic and adding what the Mossad has done that is evil.
    Unless those supplied post are about how Mossad is not really a weapon but "right-wing zealot settlers." And what makes the settlers right-wing? The fact of wanting to settle in Israel won land?

  21. They are not out to get you by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Sometimes it seems like Slashdot posts stories about Israel

    The same could be said about Australia any time it's government does anything stupid related to technology, thus I suggest growing up.
    We are not all out to get you.

  22. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm glad to know that bigotry is acceptable! I'm off to make Jew jokes and then get upset that people get angry with me. After all, Jewish people chose their religion, didn't they?

  23. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Its interesting that the same President that see racism in the legitimate actions of the Cambridge Police and the State of Arizona, hides the anti-Semitic prose of its National Security Adviser.

    You will know racism is sufficiently dead when we can tell jokes again. I don't know if James Jones is actually anti-semitic, but telling a joke about a race does not alone make one racist, any more than telling a blonde joke makes someone anti-blonde.

    --
    Qxe4
  24. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by matria · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    er...Jew is a race. "Real" Jews can in fact be identified by DNA.
    http://www.healthanddna.com/ancestry-dna-testing/jewish-dna.html

  25. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Really that's just a story about an idiot that thinks he should start a presentation with an ethnic joke. It doesn't matter enough to make much fuss over because you can be sure that such an idiot doesn't do much of the real work.

  26. Re:For chrissakes... by matria · · Score: 1, Informative

    Add to that the usually ignored fact that it was Israeli land that was occupied by Jordan and Egypt for 19 years before the Jordanian and Egyptian occupation was lifted.

    Funny how during those 19 years of Jordanian occupation of the West Bank and Egyptian occupation of Gaza that nobody ever suggested a Palestinian state in those occupied territories. And that during those 19 years (and the 40 years since then) the 400,000 or so refugees from the 1948 war were kept blocked up in the "camps" and not allowed to disperse among their Muslim brethren, nor those from the West Bank area and Gaza allowed to return to their homes in the West Bank and Gaza, as all other refugees from all other wars all over the world do.

  27. MAZAL TOV!!!! by Phizzle · · Score: 5, Funny

    The iPad is now KOSHER!!!

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  28. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha a Jew gene. All the other Jews are fakes just trying to piss Hamas off.

  29. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He jew that...

  30. Why the iPad? iDigital is the Israeli distributor by ebonum · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think the bigger question is how 1,000's of other foreign products go in without any problems. Why was the iPad singled out? If I take my new HTC phone fresh from Taiwan and unlicensed in Israel, they are not going to seize it.

    Time offers an explanation:

    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1983236,00.html

    "It is worth noting," Etengoff wrote, "that Apple's Israeli distributor, iDigital, is run by Chemi Peres, the hyper-entrepreneurial son of Israeli President Shimon Peres.

    "Clearly, iDigital wants its lucrative cut of every iPad brought into the country — which it will undoubtedly receive when a modified European version of the iPad is approved for import over the next two or three months.

  31. Re:Custom agents happy now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no. but they have confiscated enough to make all the custom agents and their families happy.

  32. Same is true of USA by fantomas · · Score: 1

    "The whole issue was that it was untested. That was it. As with any bureaucracy, rules must be obeyed even if in the end the result is the same."

    Indeed, though I'd go further than saying it is true of bureaucracies to any organisation or nation. Would the USA trust a device made in China (for example) if the Chinese government said they'd tested it? Probably not. Would a US company (say Ford, or Cisco, or Apple) trust a foreign made device because the Chinese/Italian/Kazakh/whatever makers said they'd tested it? Probably not.

    I suppose it's down to a> how much you trust the people who tell you they've tested it and b> how much trouble you'll be in if it goes wrong and you've just taken somebody else's word that it's safe/within correct bounds when it actually proves to not be so.

    I should imagine in the USA with the whole run-by-lawyers culture, sue-you-for-anything there's a lot of pressure to do your own testing to make sure devices do actually behave how they are meant to. Not sure what the drive is in Israel but I guess it's perfectly believable similar pressures happen there.

  33. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by keeboo · · Score: 2, Informative

    er...Jew is a race. "Real" Jews can in fact be identified by DNA.

    There's DNA you may identify was "jew", but things are not that simple.
    The moment you make such connection a rule, you'll end up with things like jew families who are no longer jews and weird things like christian jews.

    This whole debate of who is a jew is a mess. If you want to know more, you may start here and here.

  34. Funniest I ever seen was a Hinjew. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a mess, is all I can tell yew.

  35. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then what do you call a practitioner of judaism?

  36. Not needed for Massad by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    Don't forget you are dealing with a group that makes "The Family" look kind at times and they have both lots of desert and a very nice body of water to hide stuff. If the Massad wanted to get a shipping container of iPads for whatever reason most likely they would just ask for them (and get them) or they would just "vanish".

    Just remember if you go far enough back both groups involved are in fact Family.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  37. Re:And the White House comments on Isreal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The joke was racist against Muslims too, wasn't it? Did the fact that the wandering man was a Taliban add anything to the joke? Would the joke have been less funny or lost some subtle context if the "Taliban" was just described as a "man"? Where's your indignation on that matter?

  38. The REAL reason iPads were "banned" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel just "banned" them so they could confiscate them...they wanted iPads, they just didn't want to wait in line at launch. ;)

  39. Apples and Oranges by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you're going to buy an Apple to use an Apple, why would you make it run like an orange?

    Because not all applications on which a business depends are available for Mac OS X. That's why Orange Micro used to sell single-board PCs that fit in one of a Mac's slots. This was faster than the emulation that was otherwise required before Apple switched to x86 CPUs.

  40. Microwave oven is an appliance, not a computer by tepples · · Score: 1

    Because I can tell you right now that if you buy a mac you not only get the development tools for it (as well as the iPod touch, iPhone and iPad) for free

    So if you have an iPad and you currently sync it with a PC, you need to buy a Mac mini and a subscription to a service that costs $99 per year (iPhone developer program) in order to turn your iPad into a computer. Otherwise, the iPad is called an "appliance". Your microwave oven has a microprocessor, but do you ordinarily think of it as a "computer"?

  41. Things to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So your saying that Israel is a sign of things to come for the US?

    Great, just fucking great.

  42. Big problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a huge market for google....

  43. You can't go further than the end by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    As with ANY bureaucracy

    Indeed, though I'd go further than saying it is true of bureaucracies to any organisation or nation.

    Which part of my "ANY" was not clear?

    It's hard to go further when I was already at the end of the line waiting.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You can't go further than the end by fantomas · · Score: 1

      "Which part of my "ANY" was not clear?"

      I was pointing out that there are organisations and nations which are not primarily bureaucracies, though on reflections you might argue that all established organisations are bureaucracies so your succinctness was correct.

    2. Re:You can't go further than the end by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Well, I see where organizations (or as you say nations) might not initially be perceived as bureaucracies... it's just that I think of any group larger than 10 or so automatically becoming a "bureaucracy" with all the inherent behavioral issues...

      So, sorry for being a bit snippy in response. I really did mean to cover any nation or large group.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  44. Information is power by maroberts · · Score: 1

    I don't think the Chinese have much to fear on the guns front but they definitely don't like their citizens to have certain information.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  45. Re:For chrissakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the 400,000 or so refugees from the 1948 war were kept blocked up in the "camps" and not allowed to disperse among their Muslim brethren, nor those from the West Bank area and Gaza allowed to return to their homes in the West Bank and Gaza, as all other refugees from all other wars all over the world do.

    Why should the refugees disperse amongst Muslim bretheren when they HAD homes stolen by Israelis?

    Neat the way you ignore the fact that occupied Palestine(AKA Israel) has never allowed the right of return to those whose homes and land were stolen.

    Occupied Palestine is an apartheid theocracy, where only those of a certain religion are allowed to rule.

    The 400,000 were refugees from ethnic cleansing by
    the various terrorist organisations who fought a nasty campaign in the late 1940'2 to ethnically cleanse a part of Palestine.

  46. as an israeli, i can tell you why it took time by lagi · · Score: 1

    it just takes time for Israelis to read and understand the contents of the English written user manual
    we only use basic English words: "Like", "Facebook", "Comment", "Download" ... j/k :)