Slashdot Mirror


Kid Health Experts Attack Video Game Summer Camp

Jack Action writes "The University of British Columbia runs a summer camp where kids get to play computer games for three hours a day. The camp organizers say it is 'a good social opportunity for some kids who didn't fit into other programs.' However, health professionals declare they are 'troubled' by the camp. A professor in UBC's department of medicine says kids should be outside and engaged in 'unstructured play,' while the CEO of an NGO that monitors kids' health chimes in that they already spend too much time in front of screens and not exercising. Do the health experts have a point, or are they just criticizing something they don't understand, or perhaps is not to their taste?"

28 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Unstructured Play? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just Cause 2 is pretty unstructured.

  2. One time... by InvisibleSoul · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...at video game camp...

    1. Re:One time... by ig88b · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...I stuck a wiimote...

    2. Re:One time... by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...into my TV because I wasn't wearing the protective...

  3. Last I checked... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the day is still 24 hours. Are three hours of video games more detrimental to their bodies than 6 to 8 hours of school classes?

    1. Re:Last I checked... by spyder913 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...or reading? People are too quick to condemn video games.

    2. Re:Last I checked... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We have a winner!

      When I was in school I woke up at 5:30-6:00am, and spent until 3:00 sitting in one seat or another before coming home and "officially" having 3 hours* of homework per class according to pretty much every document the school had.

      Take 9 hours for sleeping and you've got 15 left during the day, 12 hours of something other than playing videogames for 4 months straight is a damn sight less unhealthy for kids than sitting at a desk for about 12 hours a day for ~10 months straight.

      *Yes, 18 hours of homework starting at 3pm. Nobody I asked could ever find the problem with this until I pointed out that would last until after my second class the next day.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    3. Re:Last I checked... by nbert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Prof. Mckay seems to be more concerned about "obesity levels" according to the article. However, I highly doubt that a summer camp is the right place to fix this issue and 3 hours of computer games a day won't make anyone fatter than he/she already is. It is hard for me to see any point in this story.

    4. Re:Last I checked... by GoatCheez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I went to a private school and we also had 3 hours of homework per class per day. The scary part is that sometimes we really were assigned 3 hours of homework per class per day. We also were required to write a term paper for each non-english class per semester. For english classes we generally had 2-4 papers to do per semester depending on grade and level. Term papers and preparation for them (reading source material) did not factor into the 3 hours. I REALLY hated high school. Let these kids play some games for 3 hours.

    5. Re:Last I checked... by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now this doesn't make a lick of sense to me.

      I admit to being a slacker. I don't know whether or not I'm a "genius" of any kind, and in fact I doubt it, but I passed all of high school and a 4 year college (in 6 years, admittedly) doing virtually none of the homework assigned. I have a decent grasp on pretty much everything I set my mind to in spite of that, even just barely passing. Am I ready to jump into any number of careers that require some of the more arcane things they taught? No. But I'd probably put myself in the 60-80% range of understanding for a lot of it. I'm fairly sure that at one point in high school, I didn't study for a math class, was the first to finish the test, and also got 100.

      If you as a school system have to work someone 1000% as hard as I worked--or more--to get them that remaining 20-40%, you are completely out of your fucking minds.

      And I don't want to hear any teachers telling me how hard it is to teach kids. I'm not bashing the teachers. It's possible nobody in the world today has figured out a classroom environment / mass teaching paradigm that actually encourages 90-100% retention without inordinate amounts of work. More likely, whether anyone's figured it out or not, virtually nobody is trying to implement it, and instead they're all working using the methods passed down from previous years, decades, centuries.

      I'll tell you what, though; I was always up to listen to things and up for getting hands-on with anything. Homework was something that for whatever reason totally freaked me out, so I didn't do it, but if you gave me something interesting to listen to, or something interesting to do, I was all over it. I'm sure there are plenty of others. "Study this because studies say studying will teach you things" is no replacement for teaching.

      End rant before I go in circles again.

    6. Re:Last I checked... by hldn · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm one of those that didn't bother with extracurricular activities or homework and i don't live in my parents' basement, you insensitive clod.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    7. Re:Last I checked... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Close, it was for a grade and they actually did tend to give absurd quantities of work.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    8. Re:Last I checked... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Informative

      All three i personally attended in 3 different states on opposite coasts and several dozen more spread throughout the country that people I've conversed with have attended.

      http://www.google.com/#hl=en&safe=off&q=%223+hours+of+homework%22&fp=d9bfea1616ddd46f

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    9. Re:Last I checked... by misexistentialist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that guideline is from college where you have 2 classes/week. Teachers teach what they were taught.

  4. video games = violence by fattmatt · · Score: 2, Funny

    These fat kids are just going to end up violent killers ... that is the more troubling issue!!

    1. Re:video games = violence by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least we'll be able to outrun them when they come for us!

  5. Lets Do the Math by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    24 hours in a day.

    As a kid, we'll say you SHOULD be getting 9 hours of sleep a night. Thats what the health experts say, anyways, especially for teens.

    So we're down to 15 hours already. Okay, lets say an hour for each of your 3 meals. Normally breakfast is a bit quicker and dinner is a bit longer, but it should all even out. So 12 hours. Lets say you want 3 hours of some kind of lessons. 9 hours. 3 hours for video games? 6 hours left.

    Thats 6 hours left to exercise outside, is that not an incredibly high amount? That's almost as much as a day job. These kids should BE so lucky.

    1. Re:Lets Do the Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      these are teen and pre-teen boys, you left out 3 hours a day for masturbation

      I thought that counted as exercise....

    2. Re:Lets Do the Math by BitterOak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      these are teen and pre-teen boys, you left out 3 hours a day for masturbation

      Three hours?!?!? When I was a teen, it only took me 5 minutes, thus totalling about 30 minutes per day.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  6. If it was a "reading" camp by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they'd have no problem with it. In fact they'd probably praise it for being innovative. Double standard. - I think a gaming camp is a cool idea, especially if the games are oriented towards RPGs (reading) or simulations (strategies). Plus it's only 3 hours a day.
        They get exercise the other ~10 hours in the day.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:If it was a "reading" camp by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would suggest those "troubled health professionals" find a summer camp where they can go fuck themselves for 3 hours a day.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. My anecdotal experience by assemblyronin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The camp organizers say it is 'a good social opportunity for some kids who didn't fit into other programs.'

    Back in High School we had a really cool teacher that let us setup a LAN with 5 computers in his classroom; We mostly played Quake and Warcraft II. It even expanded to the point that we had one guy running a D&D campaign, others would bring their MTG cards, and one guy was messing around with building robots. Point being, a good bulk of the guys that showed up were guys that weren't getting any meaningful peer interaction otherwise, because the other clubs and activities weren't up their alley . Gaming would happen, yes, but since there were only 5 computers a lot of socialization happened as well.

  8. Re:3 Hours A Day by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well this being Canada, for the remaining 8hrs, we go out as a young child and wrangle our first beaver. Once we've successfully captured ibe, without our ankles being gnawed off we go for the moose. They're very tame, believe it or not. We haven't had a single goring fatality up here in 30 years. Once you've successfully got your pet beaver, and your war moose. We go hunting the national pest, it's called the Canadian Goose or They who shit on everything. That pretty much fills up the summer, kids are then taught to bunker down for the winter which lasts 8mo between construction, and black fly month.

    This isn't forgetting in the winter we have hockey, and hockey to keep us active and ensure we get snow blindness.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  9. Re:THREE WHOLE HOURS! by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fact they're going to a "video game camp" is strong evidence they wouldn't have gone to a "normal" summer camp to start with. So rather than spend those hours alone in their houses playing video games, at least here they have more opportunity to interact with others... which may lead to doing more things besides playing video games at home alone.

  10. Why not board games? by Dracil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the point is social opportunity, then these provide a good social opportunity that does not require sitting in front of a screen. It arguably also requires a bit more thinking than the average video game. I'm of course, talking about games like Puerto Rico, Small World, Tigris & Euphrates, or Battlestar Galactica. Not games like Monopoly.

  11. The out of touch generation by Hammer79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like the complaints are coming from people who missed the computer revolution as children and are failing to see the big picture. I went to a computer camp in the 1989 as a 10 year old, and I had a blast. There were outdoor activities mixed in as well, but I still remember how amazed I was with even the most primitive of coding. Today, I do most of my coding on PIC's, but that early exposure to computers is what sparked my interest in this career path, and led me to pursue education in that field.

  12. What kind of sorry camp is this? by billius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are they just criticizing something they don't understand

    Okay, time to end the fake snobbery. Video games have been around for a long, long time. My dad (who will be 60 soon) owned an Atari 2600 before I or any of my siblings were born (ie he got it of his own free will). The original NES came out in the US almost 25 years ago, giving us games like the Final Fantasy series, which people spent hours and hours playing. At least *some* of the people in charge *know* what video games are, how important they are to kids and what role they play in society. However, the point of summer camp (at least as I remember it) was to give you something different. Most kids don't have the opportunity to go hiking in the woods, shoot rifles, ride horses, sail/row boats, etc at home. The point is to have a *real* adventure, the kind of experience that will stay with you for a lifetime. Spending three hours a day playing video games is a complete waste of time at summer camp as you can do the exact same thing at home. I'm sure I bitched about the rules when I was a kid (who doesn't), but I'm thankful that I was forced to "unplug" and try new things. Thanks to summer camp, I got to learn how to use woodworking tools, how to sail catamaran, how to shoot a muzzle loader and how to *properly* use a compass among other things. I'm sure at the time I would have thought it was cool if I got to play video games as well, but in retrospect I'm really glad I was "forced" to go outside and play.

    Playing Wii is not the same as learning to code at computer camp or doing cool problems at math camp. Video games at summer camp are the same as video games at home. This kind of clueless convolution rings about as hollow as the "cool adults" who talk about how "tech savvy" modern kids are because they are always texting.

  13. Some camps are more intense by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    3 hours is only a small percentage of the waking day, so IMHO this camp sounds like a normal balanced summer camp.

    Some camps are more intense. I once came across a daily schedule for a girls gymnastics camp, and it read like something from Army basic training. Workouts from 0700 to 1700. A good riding camp will have kids in the saddle five hours a day. Camps for competitive sports are so intense they're scary.