Slashdot Mirror


Man Spends 2,200 Hours Defeating Bejeweled 2

An anonymous reader writes "A California steel contractor spent 2,200 total hours over the last three years racking up a high score in Bejeweled 2. He exceeded the 2^31-1 maximum score programmed for the score display, proving that there is, in fact, an end to the game. I suppose congratulations or condolences are in order."

14 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. Signed int by Eudial · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah well, 2,147,483,647 points ought to be enough for anyone.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  2. x64 by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

    THE reason to upgrade to x64

    (Also, I thought my 5 days continuous freelancer game at university was extreme)

  3. What are the odds by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, who wants to bet that most of the time he spent playing Bejeweled he was also billing someone for contract work?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:What are the odds by Voyager529 · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, he was a QA engineer?

      Likely for McAffee.

  4. Re:Why this is sad by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are a LOT of WoW players who average more than 2 hours a day. When I played I averaged 3 hours a day. This guy enjoyed bejeweled and came home and played Bejeweled after work. A lot of americans watch about that much TV per day and they're not even posting a high score. Healthy? No. Worse than a typical high end raider in WoW? No. Worse than a typical American watching TV? No.

  5. We need more people like this guy by arcite · · Score: 4, Funny
    You all saw The Last Starfighter right? This guy has skills! Who know when unmatched matching of coloured gems could come in handy. Maybe we'll be invaded by variously Gem shaped aliens who (through a quirk in quantum mechanics no doubt) have a fatal weakness when matched in pairs of three. This guy could someday LITERALLY save the world!

    Conversely, he may have a bright future as a stockboy at Walmart (or if you will, Target), which requires speed, precision, and the ability to organize matching products in rows of three, five, up to infinity. Clearly, he is a credit to the species.

    1. Re:We need more people like this guy by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is Slashdot. A certain degree of "semantic leniency" is called for.

      P.S., You insensitive clod.

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:We need more people like this guy by slamden · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's funny, we one time hired a guy to help us move in Chicago. He packed the truck like I had never seen before, perfectly floor to ceiling, all in the front half, tied down and perfectly stable. The back was 100% empty. It was certainly more efficient than the horizontal stacking that occurs whenever I pack a moving van.

      Turns out the guy was a former Tetris champ making a little side money to pay for grad school.

    3. Re:We need more people like this guy by feardiagh · · Score: 5, Funny

      During one of my moves we had the a full wall minus one box all set. As my buddy was about to place the last box and complete the wall I called out "Wait! You can't put that box there or all my stuff will disappear." He laughed. Then he thought about it and started a second row saying "Just in case."

  6. Re:Why this is sad by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Although maybe I shouldn't talk: how many hours does the average American watch TV a day? Although they wouldn't lock someone up for watching TV for 2 hrs a day, but if they did something crazy like, throw rocks at a tree for 2 hours, everyday, for 3 yrs, someone might notice. I think this guy needs professional help.

    Oh, so what...

    Really. Yes, plenty of people watch 2 hours of TV a day. Frankly, that's not all that excessive. Figure one 1-hour newscast and one 1-hour length drama/show. Does that put it more in perspective?

    I'm not a gamer, so personally, I wouldn't spend 2 hours, let alone 2 minutes, playing a computer game, but the guy hasn't caused anyone any harm, so who cares, really?

    It's not sad, it's just the way he chooses to spend his free time. Just as I might choose to spend my free time trying to learn another language - something that many other people would find boring and/or a waste of time.

  7. Why criticize? by cvnautilus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I, for one, don't consider time playing video games as "wasted." If it made this guy happy, why does it matter so long as he isn't killing and eating your goats or something?

  8. I talk to trees. by harrytuttle777 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank you for sticking up for people like me who talk to trees. I should caveat that I USED talk to trees until some of the trees started calling me crazy and laughing at me behind my back. Now I am just kind of sad.

       

  9. Because of libraries and external dependencies by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why would you use a signed integer for a value like this?

    An honest, practical answer:

    Because most people who develop software link to other libraries, and many of those libraries don't have overloaded functions that take unsigned ints as parameters.

    For example, C#'s String.Substring function takes Int32s as parameters. So if you're using an UInt32 called x to hold some kind of index that you want to use in that function, you have to 1) check to see if x is less than zero (or better yet, less than UInt32.MinValue), and if so, throw an exception, then 2) cast x to an Int32, which takes a miniscule amount of time and resources.

    It's much easier just to define x as an Int32, even if you never intend for it to be negative.

    In the case of Bejewelled, I can only guess as to what dependencies might exist. Maybe the graphics routine to display the score on the screen is some kind of DisplayNumber(Int32 number,...) function that is generic enough so that they can write the function to display any number, positive or negative, and not have to build and maintain (and risk breaking when the code is updated) yet another function to do the same thing with uints because some weird bizarre edge cases exist where people use numbers > 2^31 but for whatever reason can't just use an Int64 instead.

  10. Re:Why this is sad by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Figure 40-minute newscast, 40-minute drama/show, 40 minutes advertising

    FTFY

    (Your point still stands. I agree with you.)