Slashdot Mirror


CBS and CNN Could Be Making News Together

crimeandpunishment writes "More proof of the profound impact cable, the Internet, and other outlets have had on broadcast news organizations. CBS and CNN, who have danced around the idea of a partnership for years, may be ready to move forward. Both news organizations have a lot at stake. Broadcast network news has a gloomy financial outlook, and CNN's ratings need a jump-start."

14 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. News by Spad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe CNN could start reporting actual news instead of relying on their viewers to tweet "interesting" information about the latest celebrity breakups so they can read it out on air.

    1. Re:News by Spad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you primarily limit yourselves to news stories that occur within the US it makes it that much more difficult to fill 24 hours with actual news.

    2. Re:News by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, the C doesn't stand for Celebrity?

      I can handle the HLN format, it at least is quick and you know when there is news and when there is fluff based on the time. CNN is to news what MTV is to music videos, sure they have it but it seems to not be the focus. Fox is too flashy and the networks are too slanted to provide reporting. The state of broadcast news has forced many of us to use the internet sources that gather it all up in one area (google news is my primary but I will bounce to Drudge for fun)

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    3. Re:News by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a lot of news that happends in the United States that can make a good 24 hour plan. However the fact is that CNN is trying to get the most audence. So they are filling it with entertainment flufff. And the meaningless comentaries that just get people routing for them or going online to critize them.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:News by dcw3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod Parent/GP UP!

      We have CNN in our cafeteria at work, and it sickens me to see nothing but "entertainment news". I really don't give a shit what Paris, Lindsey, Madonna, Brad, J-Lo, and the rest of them had for breakfast.

      Until one of these "news" organizations gets it, I'll be reading mine online.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:News by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, CNN fell to third in ratings behind MSNBC and Fox News, proving that the American public prefer to be spoon-fed biased opinion shows that they know they'll agree with.

      I'm sure that's part of it, but speaking for myself I stopped watching CNN because they replaced hard news coverage with gimmicks like iReport, floating pie charts and Star Wars holonet knock offs.

      The only serious American television newscast that's left is the PBS Newshour.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  2. Clone Walter Cronkie from his DNA. by EWAdams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they really want to retain viewers, they might... I dunno... try actual journalism and integrity. It worked for Walt.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  3. Re:CBS news = NNS by tnok85 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doubtful. They'd just organize it as a 'government regulated monopoly' in the best interest of the viewers. Then they could make sure that we only get the news we need.

  4. CNN, time to do *something* by jgreco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A large percentage of the links off the CNN homepage these days are to the ireport web site, and they don't even differentiate them anymore like they used to. As a general rule, I don't care to see amateur news reporting, and this has been one reason I've used CNN less lately. I'd rather have less news but have it be high quality.

  5. Making news by omission by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When things go wrong, journos are quick to point out that they only report what is happening. That's the academic theory they've been taught, in any case.

    Journos "make" news in what they choose to report and not to report. For example, which of the MPAA-controlled U.S. TV news organizations has reported on ACTA?

  6. Good luck to them by davmoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope they succeed at making news by merging, because they sure as hell can't report it. Using the words "journalism" and "CNN" in the same sentence has got to be the oxymoron of the year. And CBS isn't that much better any more.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  7. New name? by Briareos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So are they going to call it "CNNBS"?

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    1. Re:New name? by BlindSpot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So are they going to call it "CNNBS"?

      That would be appropriate, since CNN has been spewing nothing but BS for years now.

  8. CNN's ratings need a jump-start? by brxndxn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the problem. CNN cares about ratings. That means they care about the short term at the expense of their reputation as a viable news organization.

    Here's a quick fact for all of you TV executives: YOUR RATINGS ARE GOING DOWN BECAUSE PEOPLE HAVE MORE OPTIONS. Quit trying to build this 'one size fits all morons' news channel and start actually reporting news. Hollywood gossip belongs on the Entertainment channel. Quick one-liners and talking heads belong on the Commentary channel. Crazy banners trying to get me all worked up over the world's dumbest terrorist (ya.. that guy from Pakistan recently) belong on the Fear channel. Instead, CNN includes all these things and then calls it the News channel. Seriously? CNN, right now, you are stupider than your audience. You target an audience of stupid people with even stupider content. Even stupid people want to get smarter.

    Right now, if you watched CNN all day 24/7, you would not know who your lawmakers are, you would not know which countries are where or what their political system is, understand any non-simplistic political or social situations, understand social and market changes or direction, hear more than a single sentence from a single person at a time without her being interrupted, hear about any real dirt or corruption involved with any affiliated corporation, or understand the real 'world situation.' So, it's entertainment - not news.

    And, you talking head assholes (that's pretty much every CNN reporter except Jack Cafferty), IT'S NOT YOUR FUCKING JOB TO SET THE AGENDA FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Quit trying to tell people how to think. Quit identifying any political candidates as 'non-viable' or 'a longshot' or 'fringe' before you talk about them without letting people decide for themselves. Quit having opinions on everything. Quit being condescending to less educated people trying to make a difference in less affluent areas. Quit fabricating shit out of nothing - If there was a device that people thought was a bomb, but was determined not to be a bomb, don't report that it was a bomb! Quit talking only about buzzword political issues like abortion, gun control, and prayer in schools - like they are the only political problems facing the US. Quit wasting our time.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!