Slashdot Mirror


Europeans Bury "Digital DNA" Inside a Mountain

adeelarshad82 writes "In a secret bunker deep in the Swiss Alps, European researchers deposited a 'digital genome' that will provide the blueprint for future generations to read data stored using defunct technology. The sealed box containing the key to unpick defunct digital formats will be locked away for the next quarter of a century behind a 3-1/2 ton door strong enough to resist nuclear attack at the data storage facility, known as the Swiss Fort Knox. The capsule is the culmination of the four-year 'Planets' project, which draws on the expertise of 16 European libraries, archives, and research institutions, to preserve the world's digital assets as hardware and software is superseded at a blistering pace. The project hopes to preserve 'data DNA,' the information and tools required to access and read historical digital material and prevent digital memory loss into the next century."

161 comments

  1. Quick... destroy it!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Future generations of purist can use it as a reference for "cleansings".

    1. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by spazdor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's be real here. We're doing this so that anthropologists from other spacefaring civilizations will be able to read all the stories about us plowing ourselves to hell.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    2. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by spazdor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Blowing. What the hell are you trying to say, typo gnomes?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    3. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They are saying we will die off to unsustainable farming?

    4. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's just say that you wouldn't want Monsanto's license server to go offline...

    5. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by eln · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I just assumed you meant that humanity would at some point finally give up our weapons and beat our swords into plowshares...then we would beat each other to death with those plowshares.

    6. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they'll understand the languages that are contained on all that data....

    7. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by spazdor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, naturally we'll also archive a copy of all the Rosetta Stone(tm) language packages.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    8. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by spazdor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      *taps sig thoughtfully*

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    9. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Why not? It's up to them to prove you don't have a licence to use their products. If they have to admit in court that "sorry but our licence database cannot produce a report saying joe smith does not have a licence", that would satisfy my reasonable doubt.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    10. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      They could just have thrown in an Amiga into the vault and closed the door behind it. It can do anything, even crush patents!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    11. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by clemdoc · · Score: 1

      Swords to plowshares!

    12. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a zip drive in there.

    13. Re:Quick... destroy it!. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Just think of what a nuclear plowshare would be capable of.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  2. Fuck you PC World. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would it have killed you to include the slightest mention of what "the key to unpick defunct digital formats" is in an article discussing how the Europeans have stashed one away?

    1. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The key is a COBOL program written on punchcard.

    2. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the Elvish word for 'friend'

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've cryogenically frozen one of the members of Deviance

    4. Re:Fuck you PC World. by J.J.+Dane · · Score: 5, Informative
    5. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dwarvish*

    6. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

    7. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key is 1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5

    8. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, Elvish. The mines were the Dwarves', but the entrance the Fellowship used was meant for the Elves, from the Second Age when they were on better terms with the Dwarves.

    9. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BA-C0-14?

    10. Re:Fuck you PC World. by h00manist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would it have killed you to include the slightest mention of what "the key to unpick defunct digital formats" is in an article discussing how the Europeans have stashed one away?

      Can't be mentioned, it's a stash of software, much of it copyrighted, abandonware with no clear owners, old versions of software with no proper redistribution licence, etc. Emulators for old platforms, with copyright and patent issues. And a bunch of old equipment, with as much specifications and manuals as possible. So in order to provide information to future generations, this generation's laws had to be somewhat ignored.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    11. Re:Fuck you PC World. by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      defunct digital formats

      Hope they included blu-ray

    12. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The don't want to alienate their PCWorld reader base, who get uncomfortable with terms like hash, key, compression, bytes, xor, linked-list, or other worlds. They do know how to change Windows' wallpaper though. (Although they're call that the "screensaver").

      On another note, why are they sticking in a .MOV file? I can't even view one of them!

    13. Re:Fuck you PC World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mellon! Er, wait...

    14. Re:Fuck you PC World. by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      I love the song.

    15. Re:Fuck you PC World. by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, It's a TB of documents all in Word 95 format. What can go wrong?

    16. Re:Fuck you PC World. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      But, hopefully, by the time we ever need it, the copyrights will be expired.

      We can only hope Disney goes out of business soon so content created in the later half of last century will be freed by the middle of next century.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  3. Frankly... by raving+griff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we are taking such precautions to insure that this data key will not be destroyed, would not in the worst case scenario virtually every piece of data that ISN'T buried under a mountain be gone too?

    1. Re:Frankly... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suspect that the logic(aside from the fact that it simply isn't economic to store everything in blast vaults), is that today's cheap, common, ubiquitous digital formats are widespread enough to more or less protect themselves through sheer numbers(can you imagine how much of the earth's surface you'd have to nuke to get rid of all the XP install CDs?); but that the incentives and technology required for them to be readable and useful in a few decades, or after a modest nuclear exchange or something, are actually quite rare. Thus, you put the work and money into building the reading/decoding tech, and just bury that.

    2. Re:Frankly... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 2, Funny

      can you imagine how much of the earth's surface you'd have to nuke to get rid of all the XP install CDs?

      Dear God, you'd have to nuke the entire freakin' planet!

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    3. Re:Frankly... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Funny

      From orbit, no less.

    4. Re:Frankly... by gdshaw · · Score: 4, Funny

      can you imagine how much of the earth's surface you'd have to nuke to get rid of all the XP install CDs?

      A noble objective to be sure, but I for one believe that GNU/Linux can and should achieve world domination peacefully.

    5. Re:Frankly... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Its the only way to be sure.

    6. Re:Frankly... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the logic(aside from the fact that it simply isn't economic to store everything in blast vaults), is that today's cheap, common, ubiquitous digital formats are widespread enough to more or less protect themselves through sheer numbers(can you imagine how much of the earth's surface you'd have to nuke to get rid of all the AOL install CDs?); but that the incentives and technology required for them to be readable and useful in a few decades, or after a modest nuclear exchange or something, are actually quite rare. Thus, you put the work and money into building the reading/decoding tech, and just bury that.

      FTFY

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    7. Re:Frankly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you see? We COULDN'T be sure!

      Oh god, we're screwed, man!

    8. Re:Frankly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you imagine how much of the earth's surface you'd have to nuke to get rid of all the XP install CDs?

      XP installs what about all those free AOL disks

    9. Re:Frankly... by RDW · · Score: 1

      'If we are taking such precautions to insure that this data key will not be destroyed, would not in the worst case scenario virtually every piece of data that ISN'T buried under a mountain be gone too?'

      Well, if I've learned anything from James Bond films, their precautions ('Accompanied by burly security guards in black uniforms, scientists carried a time capsule through a labyrinth of tunnels and five security zones to a vault near the slopes of chic ski resort Gstaad.') pretty much ensure the whole thing will be destroyed by sabotage within a month, probably in a large explosion. Bet you 'Andreas Rauber' owns at least one white cat, has installed a large, obvious, self destruct button in the central chamber, and will insist on explaining his world domination plans in detail to the first MI6 agent his guards capture.

    10. Re:Frankly... by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      The key difference being that, at some point in the future, someone may actually want to access the contents of an XP install disk.

    11. Re:Frankly... by jimboisbored · · Score: 1

      Game over man, game over!

  4. Hmm. by swanzilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The sealed box containing the key to unpick defunct digital formats will be locked away for the next quarter of a century behind a 3-1/2 ton door"..."the information and tools required to access and read historical digital material and prevent digital memory loss into the next century."

    Perhaps they should include the calculations they used to equate 25 years with 90 years.

    1. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will be locked away for the next quarter of a century

      Read: we intend to open the vault in 25 years

      prevent digital memory loss into the next century.

      Read: the data should still be readable in 90 years.

      Perhaps you should learn to read?

    2. Re:Hmm. by Robin47 · · Score: 1

      "The sealed box containing the key to unpick defunct digital formats will be locked away for the next quarter of a century behind a 3-1/2 ton door"..."the information and tools required to access and read historical digital material and prevent digital memory loss into the next century."

      Perhaps they should include the calculations they used to equate 25 years with 90 years.

      Those calculations are the key.

    3. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, are you calling into question Swiss time keeping? Perhaps it's a metric time thing...

    4. Re:Hmm. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      They were specifying the years in dotBeats, or whatever in the hell they called those things.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  5. What if... by EdtheFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if future generations never find it after the apocalypse? After all, it is in a secret bunker deep in the Swiss Alps

    1. Re:What if... by thedonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or what if they do find it and can't figure out how to use the key? Even a written language can become undecipherable after enough time passes. Now they think they can ensure digital access to an unknown future generation with technology we can't imagine? At the very least that requires electricity analogous to what we have now, and - now I'm talking hundreds of years - just the idea of encoding data in 1's and 0's. By then we'll just be imprinting information in viscous goop and reading it by dipping our finger in the goop and tasting it. Try that with any current storage media.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... we'll just be imprinting information in viscous goop and reading it by dipping our finger in the goop and tasting it. Try that with any current storage media.

      mmmm... Delicious knowledge...

    3. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By then we'll just be imprinting information in viscous goop and reading it by dipping our finger in the goop and tasting it.

      Well, that's sure give a new flavor to being goatse'd.

  6. AACS + CSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, will it include information on how to crack AACS and CSS? No wonder they are locking the door until we have a new format...

  7. The Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the "key" they're talking about, is basically a file format descriptor. Basically they're storing the opposite of what the patent-infringement-lobby in Hollywood (see: Why they went to California instead of paying Edison Company) does. Basically the anti-DRM.

    1. Re:The Key? by Leperous · · Score: 1

      Ok, but this begs a simple question: how is the information describing the file formats itself encoded?

    2. Re:The Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omg... we forgot to include an ASCII chart!!! Omg, what a Latin characters anyway? OMG!!! What is a chart!!!

    3. Re:The Key? by The_countess · · Score: 1

      its encoded in English (and maybe German, French, Spanish and Chinese)? and on paper maybe? or maybe a clay tablet. or a golden one.

    4. Re:The Key? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok, but this begs a simple question: how is the information describing the file formats itself encoded?

      It's printed on surplus thermal fax paper from the 70's. That stuff will last forever!

    5. Re:The Key? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Just a demonstration of why the most important thing about data preservation is choosing the right technology: I went to Wendy's last week and found out the hard way that they use thermal paper to print their receipts. By the time I got to where you're going, the heat from the food had turned my receipt into a charcoal-grey blob with indistinct writing....

      Acid-free paper goes a long way, but ultimately they need to put acid-free paper maps TO the vault all over the place, paint them on sides of buildings, etc. so that if civilization collapses, somebody millennia from now will be able to find the vault. Either that or they need to bury it near a population center so that people will actually be LOOKING for it. This, of course, assumes that they expect civilization to collapse. If they don't, then there's really no point to doing any of this.

      It's not like we can't find hardware to read legacy digital media from the late 1970s or early 1980s on. The reason it's hard to find stuff before that is because A. stuff wasn't standardized before that point, and B. it wasn't prevalent enough. Thus, out of the triple-digit instances of a particular model of mainframe tape drive, a single-digit number of them might still be functional, and that single-digit number might be zero. When you have hardware that was built in the millions of units, this is not nearly as common a problem. Also, now that data formats have largely converged to a set of broadly deployed standards, chances are, any records of value are periodically carried forward to newer hardware anyway, making this largely moot. The exceptions are mostly government jobs. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:The Key? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Err... by the time I got to where I was going.... This is what happens when you completely rewrite a sentence one too many times.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:The Key? by PTFD5023 · · Score: 1

      Naaaah, they saved it as a PDF file and saved it to an iPad.

    8. Re:The Key? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Acid-free paper goes a long way, but ultimately they need to put acid-free paper maps TO the vault all over the place, paint them on sides of buildings, etc. so that if civilization collapses, somebody millennia from now will be able to find the vault.

      Hey, perhaps they should store all the stuff in a MySQL database. I've heard that it's ACID-free as well.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:The Key? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Klingon of course.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    10. Re:The Key? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      We have a similar vault (warehouse) of old tech at my work. Our data recovery folks have to deal with computer generated data going back to the 60's. Bleah!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    11. Re:The Key? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Obviously, it's in "key.doc"

    12. Re:The Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, but this begs a simple question

      No, it doesn't.

  8. Ogg Theora with XviD inside? by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    Do they have Ogg Theora? I ask because I have some videos I transcoded a year or two ago and....

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  9. That's what They say... by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2, Funny

    Always been wondering what those Swiss are doing under those mountains. Storing information about data formats, sure. This is propaganda straight from Them - They want you to believe this to secure what is *really* down there. Data formats, right - They could as well hang out a sign reading "The content of this underground bunker complex is BORING. Don't go there, you'd only waste your time." Something up in Their propaganda department lately? I am used to better work.

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    1. Re:That's what They say... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      Always been wondering what those Swiss are doing under those mountains.

      This is just a ploy, a cover, for there ultimate goal.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    2. Re:That's what They say... by kalyptein · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah yes, I see the Swiss delved too greedily and too deep...

      --
      Entropy gets everyone.
    3. Re:That's what They say... by InterGuru · · Score: 1

      The Swiss have long protected all their military force in underground bunkers. This is one reason Hitler did not attack them. For details, see The Swiss Army by John McPhee.

      When I lived there 25 years ago all houses and workplaces a nuclear bomb shelters.

    4. Re:That's what They say... by piquadratCH · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Swiss have long protected all their military force in underground bunkers. This is one reason Hitler did not attack them.

      Could you please stop spreading false information that historians debunked decades ago? Thanks.

    5. Re:That's what They say... by Dragooner · · Score: 1

      Maybe they have a stargate.

      --
      Fugga Wugga
    6. Re:That's what They say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are just piggybacking the 'data as a ploy to hide those insidious chocolate recipes, allied with the Dutch.

  10. Nothing new by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's been done before, in various guises. The BBC Domesday project springs to mind, and numerous digital timecapsules.

    It seems to me that such projects have a lot in common with SETI searches - somehow providing information to someone who may not have the capability to decode it until they understand the entire message anyway. It always gets me that in such projects they don't do simple things before they lock stuff away, or send a message, like: give a bunch of (non-computing) students the devices / data and don't tell them what it is, how it works. Make sure they've never heard of the project you're working on, then lock them in a room with the data / devices and see what they do. If they can't decode it completely, your project is too elaborate and will not meet its aims. If they only decode it because of their knowledge of the area, then get someone else. Until an average mathematician / physicist / whatever can decode it, it's too complicated to be decoded by a post-nuclear generation and / or ET considering their inherent communication problems in some circumstances anyway.

    I have a good feeling that the Voyager golden records would never be completely decoded in such circumstances.

    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a good feeling that the Voyager golden records would never be completely decoded in such circumstances.

      Yeah, but so what? You'd probably have done the exact same thing... well I'll freely admit I would have. That was Carl Sagan's baby, and he was basically doing it to get laid by impressing his girlfriend and then wife.

    2. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, but if the golden records are played backwards, they're actually Rainbow's 1978 Long Live Rock 'n' Roll, which should provide sufficient warning to any semi-intelligent species out there. R.I.P. R.J.D. :/

    3. Re:Nothing new by symes · · Score: 1

      There is another issue worth considering - perhaps if current human endeavours wreak mahem on Earth then surely it would be perhaps quite a good idea to start afresh.

    4. Re:Nothing new by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Squirrels or raccoons?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:Nothing new by Yer+Mum · · Score: 1

      And to prove the article's point, the Domesday project is to all intents and purposes now unreadable.

  11. Does this include the DRM keys? by DadLeopard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this include the DRM keys to all the defunct DRM schemes that were supposed to let you access the songs, video and books that you had bought, but went out of business and took the keys to your data with them! Or is this just a copy of the DVD Rebook and other such information on the various and sundry formats!

    1. Re:Does this include the DRM keys? by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Let's hope that there are enough pirated CDs and DVDs :)

  12. Encrypted formats? by ThisIsAnonymous · · Score: 1

    I guess they will stash a copy of AnyDVD somewhere in the vault as well...

  13. Did they remember... by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

    Did they remember to include information on how to read the BBC Doomsday project laserdiscs?

    I believe the required laserdisc players went out of production something more than 10 years ago and spare parts stopped being manufactured something like 5 years ago.

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
    1. Re:Did they remember... by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Don't forget CEDs.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Did they remember... by The_countess · · Score: 1

      provided the level of technology hasn't gone down too far, or has sufficient recovered after a doomsday event, I'm guessing figuring how to read the dots of those disks isn't going to be all that much of a problem. provided they printen a ascii table on one side, it should be all set.

    3. Re:Did they remember... by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

      Reading the "dots" wouldn't help you in seeing the image data stored on a laserdisc: It's not a binary format.

      --
      No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
    4. Re:Did they remember... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Reading the "dots" wouldn't help you in seeing the image data stored on a laserdisc: It's not a binary format.

      Doesn't that make it a lot easier to decode, then?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:Did they remember... by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

      Depends upon your definition of "easier"...

      It may seem intuitive to us to spin the disc at a specific speed (dependent upon where on the disc you're reading from, this is all a massive oversimplification) and then read the data with a photodiode, filtering the signal with a few passive components before feeding that into the composite video input of a television but such details may not seem so intuitive in a few years when old CRT displays and their signaling technology has long disappeared into the sunset of obsolescence.

      --
      No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
  14. Can't escape moore's law... in 8yrs by recharged95 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...pretty much everything today can be stored on a home server in 8yrs.

    With distributed technology, cloud servers, and bit torrent, to spend a few million to store a few formats and keycodes on moving tectonic plates seems a bit illogical. Humans didn't do it 10000 years ago and we still figured out what happened back then.

    1. Re:Can't escape moore's law... in 8yrs by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Humans didn't do it 10000 years ago and we still figured out what happened back then.

      Don't forget the cave paintings, scrolls, clay tablets and the like. (:

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Can't escape moore's law... in 8yrs by flaming+error · · Score: 2

      Please refresh my memory - how did they build Stonehenge? The great pyramids? Lightsabers?

    3. Re:Can't escape moore's law... in 8yrs by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

      At least one of those is fictional. And I'm not too sure about the lightsabers, either, come to think of it.

    4. Re:Can't escape moore's law... in 8yrs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming a doubling of storage every year (which is generous) eight years gives 256 times as much storage. Are you saying that all the world's data can be stored on 256 home servers today?

      But obviously it can't. Am I missing the point? Or are you retarded?

  15. I wonder... by erroneus · · Score: 1

    We have heard of cloning by grabbing the DNA from a cell and putting it into an embryo or stem cell or whatever. But have we ever sequenced DNA, transferred the data, used it to replicate a DNA molecule, and then make a living organism from it? If we can do that, then recording DNA is good. If we can't, perhaps we ought to first work on the restoration process. We could literally seed and populate distant worlds with DNA from our planet by building a tiny factory with a database and sending it out to land on various planets in other star systems and galaxies.

    1. Re:I wonder... by Jesse_vd · · Score: 1

      you might want to read the summary

    2. Re:I wonder... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      You might be new here. The eponymously named erroneus is simply holding up the highest standards of slashdot commentary.

    3. Re:I wonder... by Jesse_vd · · Score: 1

      i kind of wondered that after checking the UN. well then i see the humour and had a similar reaction to "digital DNA"

    4. Re:I wonder... by Jesse_vd · · Score: 1

      As one unable to recall the traits of millions of slashdot users, i might tell you to do the same.

    5. Re:I wonder... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I did. But as another responder pointed out, the term "Digital DNA" got me to thinking about this OTHER idea. Perhaps I could have chosen my words better, but still... it got me thinking and that's what I was thinking about. DNA data about various life forms are being recorded even now. I just wonder about "assembly" instructions and the ability to make viable organisms.

    6. Re:I wonder... by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      Which leads me to ask the question: Why would we want to seed other planets with organisms from the earth? Just to perpetuate ourselves? What a strange idea.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    7. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a wonder it's not modded Off Topic

  16. Hope they don't lose the key to the door by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's all very well having nuke-proof bunkers and thick steel doors. But at some point someone's gotta get in there (presuming they think out digital formats are worth decoding - they could be in for a bit of a disappointment) to get the keys. If the future society gets into such a state where it's lost all the external copies of these keys it's probably not going to be too good at looking after physical means of access.

    I can just imaging after the next war / asteroid / depression / pandemic all these people standing outside this massive steel door, wondering what the hell was inside it?

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Hope they don't lose the key to the door by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Just write "Contains neither canned goods nor ammunition" on the door in a variety of common world languages, as well as the pictograms used in McDonald's procedural documentation(mankind's last written language during the apocalypse, dontcha know), and the rabble should ignore it.

    2. Re:Hope they don't lose the key to the door by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Were making these for the aliens.

    3. Re:Hope they don't lose the key to the door by couchslug · · Score: 1

      People have been able to figure out how to break rock for a very long time.

      The barrier to entry keeps out those who panic, yet rewards diligent effort in future.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Hope they don't lose the key to the door by richard.cs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember reading in some sci fi book about a vault that was sealed by attaching a chunk of a long-lived radioisotope to the back of a tight fitting steel door such that the heat released caused the door to expand and jam tightly into the frame. The idea was that it could only be opened by a fairly advanced civilisation that was capable of artificial refrigeration, plus of course able to recognise what was needed. I always found that an intriguing idea although anyone sufficiently determined could probably get in anyway

      Don't suppose anyone knows what book that was? I've been trying to find it for years now.

    5. Re:Hope they don't lose the key to the door by dr_blurb · · Score: 1

      super intelligent aliens will finally manage to enter, read about the intricacies of the Word format, and commit mass suicide.

  17. Hallelujah? by Snarkalicious · · Score: 1

    Let the great age of Apple IIe emulation last forevermore.

  18. Lack of foresight by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    In twenty-five years, there will be no way to decode the data format they used to store their data about decoding data formats. :P

  19. wow...vaguest story ever. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    we may as well have decided to pack unicorn farts into old lorries and drive them through candy mountain to the fairy princess....apply the word 'digital' 'cloud' or 'virtualization' anywhere in the aformentioned statement you feel it will produce the most revenue.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  20. On a tangentally related note... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since TFA was a bit light on the details, who wants to do some speculating on how they would preserve digital data for the long term?

    With modern CNC/rapid prototyping tech, stone or fired clay tablets could actually be surprisingly painless, if still rather bulky. Printing with good toner on high quality paper(or something paper-esque but more durable, like Tyvek) would last pretty well, and be a lot smaller.

    The more important decision would probably be how to express yourself: You'd probably want to use common world languages and math as much as possible. If you have to include binaries, you might even describe your own simple VM. If you needed better storage density, you could plaintext a description of, say, a barcode format, assuming that the future will have optical sensors good enough for the purpose, and then store the rest as barcodes printed/etched onto tablets...

  21. And don't forget by GreenSquirrel2 · · Score: 1

    to hide the pass key to the door somewhere safe.

    1. Re:And don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need: the combination to the vault door is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

  22. I sincerely hope I'm wrong by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    This is mostly a joke, but not 100% a joke. I sincerely hope it's not true. However, the thought occurs to me that maybe this "key" is nothing more than, say, a copy of Windows 98 on floppy discs. Seriously, without more information about this supposed "key" we have no way to know if those involved actually did include something that might really be useful to future generations who want to get at the data or if they did something as stupid as what I suggested.

    1. Re:I sincerely hope I'm wrong by umghhh · · Score: 1
      Donno what they put there but if it was me I would have put:
      • dvd player
      • connected to HDTV set
      • dynamo to power them
      • case full of pr0n

      Nothing else actually deserves to be stahsed away and protected. I mean frankly what artifacts of every day life that you see around actually deserve to be saved for future generations? None! Or you mean some Hollywood shit or all speeches of Reagan do?

  23. Great idea, but... by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

    The only flaw in their plan: the documents describing how to read these formats are stored on eight-inch floppies.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  24. Obligatory xkcd reference: http://xkcd.com/593/ by zill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In 3010 AD, archaeologists discovered a sealed vault hidden deep under the Earth - full of technologies that are defective by design, algorithms engineered to restrict the users on how they can enjoy their own media, even rootkits disguised as music CDs.

    What did they find? DRM Hell.

    1. Re:Obligatory xkcd reference: http://xkcd.com/593/ by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Here's a clickable link of the xkcd reference: http://xkcd.com/593/

  25. They need some parity mountains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps even a mountain range with stored keys. A single cosmic meteor could take out a mountain with no redundancy.

  26. Torrent Time Capsule? by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    The internet was initially designed to keep working in the event of a nuclear war, as it avoids having a single point of failure. Why not do the same with the "digital genome"? Distribute the "capsule" amongst thousands - millions? - of computers and update it every few months or so. Invite volunteers to participate SETI@Home style. Each participating PC / smartphone / game console / etc. etc. could hold manageable portions if it that could be readily reassembled. Store copies offline in the storage media of your choice. Deposit the instructions on assembling and using the capsule in both digital format, paper, and microfiche in libraries worldwide.

    .

    1. Re:Torrent Time Capsule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet was initially designed to keep working in the event of a nuclear war, as it avoids having a single point of failure. Why not do the same with the "digital genome"? Distribute the "capsule" amongst thousands - millions? - of computers and update it every few months or so. Invite volunteers to participate SETI@Home style. Each participating PC / smartphone / game console / etc. etc. could hold manageable portions if it that could be readily reassembled. Store copies offline in the storage media of your choice. Deposit the instructions on assembling and using the capsule in both digital format, paper, and microfiche in libraries worldwide. .

      label it xxxfurry.rar and it should seed itself

  27. Loooong term storage by MartinSchou · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been thinking about long term storage solutions for a while, and if we're looking at solutions that would survive floods, EMPs etc., pretty much all methods we have available today are done for. Also they require access to readers that may be ruined for whatever reasons.

    Essentially I keep coming back to punch-cards or similar. Not into paper, but into something like anodized titanium. The colour spectrum available there could allow something like 4 or 8 bit encoding per dot. Not entirely sure about how small you can make the dots, nor how close together you can put them if you want more than just two colours.

    It'd be somewhat human readable, in that you just need a microscope to view the dots, and then it's just the usual translation method of course. And you could store a simple "dictionary" of cards with large dots + words/characters to make it easy to translate (a Rosetta Stone). And since it's titanium it's unlikely to be affected by the usual disasters. It doesn't melt until 1,668 C, so it's probably going to be quite stable in most types of fires, it pretty resistant to acids, the anodizing should go through the metal, so even sandblasting it won't remove the information (unless you cut through it of course).

    Depending on the size of the dots, I think you could even make a simple credit card sized object, that you could show to a web cam to use as a private key for private/public key encryption, logging on to your workstation, getting in to a secure facility and so on.

    And if done properly, you could probably disguise the key if necessary. You can already get custom backs/covers for your iPod/iPhone. Why not get one with this kind of back on it? Hide the key via something like steganography, making every n pixel a part of the key.

    1. Re:Loooong term storage by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not paper?

      Documents on papyrus and parchment will last 2000+ years if properly stored.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_sea_scrolls

    2. Re:Loooong term storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the anodizing should go through the metal, so even sandblasting it won't remove the information (unless you cut through it of course).

      You fail to understand what anodizing is.

    3. Re:Loooong term storage by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      If properly stored. Notice the possible disasters I mentioned? Or even if you store them properly. What happens when you start looking at them? Accidents happen.

      And just how small can you make the characters, to make them readable later? The smaller the ink dot, the easier it is for it do disappear over time.

    4. Re:Loooong term storage by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Not at all.

      Just because titanium anodic films cannot be made thicker than about 300 nm, doesn't mean they can't ... uhm ... you know ... make you a 600 nm thick card?

      *clears throat*

      Okay, so that was me forgetting a rather basic fact.

      I suspect it was because I started out with the punch card idea. The hole goes straight through ... so if we replace the hole with a colour, that'll work as well ...

    5. Re:Loooong term storage by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Water - there are metal, stone, plastic casks that will remain water resistant over time. Or in a container in a salt mine, cave system, or geographically located where it won't flood. Like Jordan/Israel where the Dead Sea Scrolls were. Or...Black Hills of South Dakota, Wasatch range of Utah, Yucca Mountain, Missouri Karst.

      EMP - Paper/parchment is remarkably resistant to EMP. I mean, a fractional orbital bombardment system with a multi-megaton nuke could go off over the US and all the paper would remain usable.

      Multiple copies in storage in multiple locations.

    6. Re:Loooong term storage by mungewell · · Score: 1

      Why not a 2D barcode, etched or pin'ed into surface?

      DataMatrix (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datamatrix) can store upto 2335 alpha/3116 digit in a single 144x144 matrix including some pretty robust error checking, they can be 'stacked' in groups of 16. Whilst not easy, these can be decoded by hand and given a 'global standard' it is highly likely that some form of automated decoder would survive whatever disaster you are imagining.

      PS. anything that is a 'visual representation' should not be used as a security token, as it can easily be replicated.

    7. Re:Loooong term storage by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Essentially I keep coming back to punch-cards or similar. Not into paper, but into something like anodized titanium [wikipedia.org]. The colour spectrum available there could allow something like 4 or 8 bit encoding per dot. Not entirely sure about how small you can make the dots, nor how close together you can put them if you want more than just two colours.

      My god: why?!

      Let's say 3000 years from now someone were to discover such a tomb - a scientifically advanced civilization skilled in the sciences of the earth, sky, and mind.

      What do you think their response would be if they were to find a tomb full of complexly-encoded data? Might they even not recognize it as such, initially?

      It's somewhat presumptuous that their encoding methods would be even remotely similar to our's: they may have made an entirely different approach to "computing", for instance. Maybe they were mathematically/electrically/whatever advanced enough to not even bother with the 'binary' approach to computing.

      As such, they're stuck with a pretty much indecipherable mess: without having a clue what the binary data is supposed to translate to. What is the binary transitory to?

      You're up against a situation many, many times more complex than deciphering ancient Egyptian hyroglyphs due to lack of context. At least with hyroglphs, you've got the possibility of figuring things out due to the common pictographic representation - but even still it's a shot in the dark.

      So much of language is culturally derived, but short of that, it's numerical in basis (and how a solution might be derived). If you're only dealing with 2 basic symbols, derived into 16 hexadecimal symbols, and then finally into a "real actual data" format (or even with binary -> usable), you've got no basis on which to derive results.

      I'm sure there's a term for it, but I don't know it: you've got a "blind spot" between the available data (binary) and what it's conveying.

      In my opinion, the best way to do it would be as follows:
      * Your tomb itself would be accessible only with great strength (say, the weight that 20 strong men could push aside with levers). Make the door, and its surrounding encasement, of a material which does not weather or oxidize readily. On the door, inscribe (deeply) the purpose of the vault ("Tomb of Knowledge, 2010 AD, Whatever Solar Epoch") in numerous common languages. (Use a different font for each language so that their differences are somewhat indicated.)
      * Inscribe (in human-readable sizes) every single major human language, and the more esoteric/divergent minor written languages, onto a set of plaques and place them within a tomb in a geologically calm, mountainous area.
      * On these plaques you would have basic instructions as to what the tomb is, in each of the languages. The plaques would, when possible, be spaced so as like words are on the same location of associated plaques.
      * Then, pick the most common and/or easily interpretable/universal language and inscribe the bulk of your "human anthology" on those. Make sure a dictionary/thesaurus/etc. is written (and labeled) at the beginning of the stack; like in a library, 'section hangers' would point you in the right direction.
      * They would be within an inner vault, possibly only accessible through brute force (a lot of it) or solving a riddle derived from the knowledge in the entry vault - and hidden - to prevent its looting and destruction.

      (You know, document your fucking work. Unlike 99% of sysadmins/programmers out there who make the most esoteric systems imaginable and then leave it to the birds. Assholes.)

      The biggest problem with something like this is including "useless" information. If you're going to store something for an eon (or even 50 years), it better better be very important: history, science (which would include technology), classic literature, DNA records, extinct species, religious texts and the "work of cultures", and so on in decreasing importance. Likely also of significance (because this is what archeologists go gaga over today) would be including significant information about the everday lives and cultures of our societies.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    8. Re:Loooong term storage by Threni · · Score: 1

      Why not the internet? Like this underground thing, it was designed to withstand nuclear attack, and the data will be accessible to anyone with a browser. Html, jpegs and pdf files aren't going anywhere. Just create an Ubuntu vm and you're sorted.

    9. Re:Loooong term storage by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      A major problem with using non-corroding metals is that they are usually valuable. So, for very long term storage there is a good chance that someone will come along and "loot" your archive, valuing the materials over the content.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    10. Re:Loooong term storage by inigopete · · Score: 1

      I think the coloured titanium is a great idea, but it's only any good if it's recognised as information. This made me think: what if someone's done this before? Buried lots of information in the ground, in an extremely long-lived form, very deep underground where it will be safe.

      ...and we've dug down to it, had a bit of a chemical tinker with it, split it into bits and used it to fuel incredibly inefficient personal transport machines? I'm fairly sure that in a couple of centuries' time "petrol" will be the biggest joke of the 20th & 21st centuries.

      Or if that's too far-fetched, what about gemstones and diamonds? Are millions of people walking round with small fragments of immensely complicated archive information because instead of thinking "what could this mean", mankind tends to think "ooh, that's pretty..."?

  28. what's the use for this anyway? by youn · · Score: 1

    for one, I highly doubt that documentation for existing format will disappear, especially in an increasingly connected world where digital versions of documentations allow copying multiple times of that documentation in a perfect way in many different location... this is better-and-more-redundant-than-raid storage.

    further, let's suppose that some catastrophe destroys the file format spec... well there is a high probability that the data will be destroyed too

    even further... I highly doubt that the same brilliant minds that dwelve in the crypto analysis realm would not be able to reverse engineer simple formats if it came to that.

    further, the library would be obsolete if it is not continuously updated

    now, having multiple redundant copies of the library of congress (and other countries equivalents) at several locations (including file format), continuously being updated, that's something we could strive for... especially since storage is becoming cheaper. we just need to make sure it is stored on a durable storage medium

    ideally we'd include storage somewhere off the planet, that way even if a disaster messed up all our archive on earth, future generations would be able to retrieve it

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  29. swiss fort knox really exists! by vlm · · Score: 1

    at the data storage facility, known as the Swiss Fort Knox.

    When I read that, I immediately thought that must be journalist speak with the intelligence level turned way down for the mass media. However, it seems to really exist:

    http://www.swissfortknox.ch/swissfortknox-english/index.html

    "highest protection against ... " Blah blah blah long list of unlikely events. But it seems to exclude the extremely likely event of landslides and avalanches.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  30. Doom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vatican library closed, library books being sent down to mines, seed banks and DNA in mountains. Must be pretty bad, whatever is coming! ;-)

    1. Re:Doom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little do they know. ;-)

  31. Luckily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those future alien researchers will recognize that the key is stored in ADF, as 880% of the alternate universes settled on the Amiga as platform of choice about 2.8 billion years ago. The earthly phenomenon of the Amiga was actually an accidental technology transfer brought about by a bizarre gardening accident.

  32. In related news... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ...locked away for the next quarter of a century behind a 3-1/2 ton door strong enough to resist nuclear attack...

    Researchers reported that the combination to the door has been misplaced, possibly inside the vault itself. When asked, the grad-student replied, "Dude, I though you had it."

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  33. Hide it in cockroach genomes by SlideGuitar · · Score: 1

    Single safe = single point of failure. Distribute the information as noncoding dna in the genomes of cockroaches. That'll last.

  34. hmmm by squinty_s · · Score: 1

    Crystal skull anyone?

  35. Rosetta Disk, Language Archive by grendelb · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Long Now Foundation is thinking about and working on projects like The Rosetta Disk, which crams a bunch of languages onto a 4 inch metal disk. "This is an archive of over 1,500 human languages assembled in the year 02008 C.E. Magnify 1,000 times to find over 13,000 pages of language documentation. The text begins at eye-readable scale and spirals down to nano-scale. This tapered ring of languages is intended to maximize the number of people that will be able to read something immediately upon picking up the Disk, as well as implying the directions for using it—‘get a magnifier and there is more.’" That's just part of their "10,000 year library."

    1. Re:Rosetta Disk, Language Archive by DryGrian · · Score: 1

      Neato. I want one.

      --
      For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
  36. "Digital DNA"? by twmcneil · · Score: 1

    "Digital DNA" I don't know if I should snicker or barf. Hey Reuters, Don't give up your day job... Uh oh.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  37. Floppies by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I was at my parents' house over the weekend helping clean out the garage, and we found boxes and boxes of 5.25 and 3.5 floppies, in single, double, and high density, containing all kinds of memories of my childhood, including hundreds of disks of files I downloaded from BBSes, utilities, programs, games, school papers written in Deskmate and Scripsit (on my COCO3!), and so on.

    I've spent the last 3 days trying to recover data from them, but only about 5% of the disks are still readable. I wish I had done something like this as technology advanced over the years. I currently have all of my data going back to about 1996... but not much before that.

  38. Waste of money by guspasho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The summary says they are trying to preserve data into the next century. It seems to me if you want to ensure the availability of information into the next century, the least efficient thing you could do is lock it in a highly-protected vault deep under a mountain that nobody can get to. Instead you ought to be distributing the information far and wide in as many formats as possible. Post it on Wikipedia and various other sites that are likely to be preserved and distributed themselves. Print lots of physical copies and put them in all the libraries around the world. Otherwise you're just hoarding it.

    1. Re:Waste of money by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      I know the article is poorly written, but you could at least read it.

      "...adding that the project had made open-use software available online to enable people to decipher data stored in defunct formats."

      Isn't that what you're asking for?

      Furthermore, what about the hardware? The article didn't say clearly, but it sounds like they've included hardware, so I would expect to see gear to read 9-track, Exabyte, paper tape, punchcard, QIC, floppy (about a dozen formats), WORM, Zip, Diablo, and more. (All of which - except for punchcard - I've used.)

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  39. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've buried DNA inside a mountain before too - isn't that your job when you're the wingman?

  40. Should I be scared? by RedmondChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do they know something we don't know?

  41. The key?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell they're going to open the bunker?

  42. DNA is already digital (quaternary) by noidentity · · Score: 1

    They talk of digital DNA as if that's in contrast to biological DNA being analog or something, but DNA is digital, represented in quaternary (base 4).

  43. hmm, i got a time capsule also... by Nyder · · Score: 1

    ... in the form of my C64, and Apple IIe. They are 25 years old, still work, and their floppies still work.

    And via emulators I can access the same programs on my modern computer. In fact, I have all the software released for both those platforms (and others).

    Sorry, 25 years isn't that big of a deal.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  44. Yes, we could by Ranma-sensei · · Score: 1

    Vaporize Planet Earth.

    There, problem solved.

    --
    Non-supporter of Online Activation and any other draconian DRM
  45. It is impossible to back up digital data.... by rclandrum · · Score: 1

    ...with more digital data. Because all digital media becomes obsolete, it is impossible to guarantee that hardware will be extant at the point in the future when you wish to read the data. It may even be the case that the media is no longer even recognizable by future generations as something that contains information. How many 10 year olds can identify a potential information source simply by looking at an 8-inch floppy?

    No, the *only* way to back up digital information is to make it non-digital - i.e. to make it eye-readable by a human. Think paper or perhaps microfilm. Stone. Clay tablets. These things are even today instantly recognizable as a means of storing information, even when the actual language has fallen into disuse. Once it has been recognized as an important source of information (think hieroglyphics), humans will expend effort to decipher the data. But it must be recognized as an information source first, and no digital medium meets that criteria over the long term.

    Digital media does not store information, it simply acts as a slow conveyance mechanism to the next conveyance mechanism (think transfers from bus to train to plane), and if the cycle is interrupted, the data is lost.

  46. Put a copy online by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    I would think that it would be more productive to put a copy of this "digital key" online as a community accessible and editable (with moderation) resource. Open source programs that read these old formats (i.e., a library of sorts), ASCII documentation on each one, schematics of reference hardware, and the fostering of a community to maintain such a library (perhaps with funding) would probably go a longer way to ensure that an *.odt or *.xlsx document from today is still easily readable in 25 years.

    That being said, good paper documentation is probably good too.

    (I'm afraid my password protected FREDWriter documents on AppleII disks from 198* are long gone even if I could find the disks...)

  47. No DRMs ; limited Copyright problems by DrYak · · Score: 1

    So in order to provide information to future generations, this generation's laws had to be somewhat ignored.

    Thankfully, the whole thing is happening in Switzerland.
    Given the backup/archival/musem nature of the project, it might be tolerated under the fair-use provision of the swiss copyright law.
    And according the local DMCA-clone, if it is done in order to produce a legal copy, you're free to break any DRM standing in your way.
    (although I find the legality of providing tools for such protection-removal ambiguous due to bad wording).

    For software patents the situation seems to me less clear, although some of them are indeed prevented.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  48. All well and good by DRACO- · · Score: 1

    Oh this is all well and good to bury a digital copy of prized data.. What happens when everyone forgets it exists. Is anyone going around and passing out titanium plates with maps of where this data is to all libraries for the future?

    --
    Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.