Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx Benchmarked and Reviewed

tc6669 writes "Tom's Hardware just posted an interesting review of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. It includes an expanded set of OS benchmarks that they also performed on the previous LTS release (8.04), to see just how much the mainstream Linux distro has progressed in two years."

164 comments

  1. Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Better than the previous version: Ubuntu 10.03 Irrational Lynx

    1. Re:Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      wasn't the previous LTS release called "Hardly Heroin"?

    2. Re:Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No, I'm pretty sure it was called "Hairy Hardon".

    3. Re:Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I can't wait for Ubuntu 10.10 Melodramatic Mudkip

    4. Re:Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldnt it be 'MOAR MUDKIP' ?

  2. Lucid Lynx by oldhack · · Score: 1

    For a moment I thought it's a GUIfied lynx. :P

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  3. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

    They totally changed the theme, lots of bugs closed, many apps have been changed, in short you have no idea what you are talking about.

  4. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Beelzebud · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If this is how you understand it, then you must have some severe cognitive disabilities...

  5. Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by advocate_one · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is what matters to me... has anybody done reviewed that? all the reviews I've seen have been fresh installs...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I upgraded from the last lts all the way up, but I did it as they come out. It worked for me. Mind you I was running Lucid alpha, I like to stay up to date.

    2. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is a recipe for tragedy. The operating system itself upgrades perfectly well, but the GConf schemas are subtly incompatible and the GNOME people couldn't care less about solving this problem. If you're going from Hardy to Lucid I highly recommend a nuke-and-pave install and copy your homedir from a backup, without any of the dotfiles.

      I had a great deal of mysterious behavior on my laptop that was upgraded to every Ubuntu release since Hardy, and all of that stuff disappeared when I reinstalled and got rid of all my dotfiles.

    3. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just spent the morning upgrading from 9.04 to 10.04. Naively, I responded incorrectly to where GRUB should install. The upshot was my system wouldn't boot. Had to revert to a previous live CD of 9.04, re-install IT, which installed over the top of 10.04, with a good GRUB, then applied updates as recommended. The result was a running 10.04 system with all my 9.04 settings preserved. Also, I'm about a half day older with nothing to show for it except a couple of additional gray hairs.

      Why in HELL did the original upgrade mess up a perfectly good, ahem - at least functional - GRUB (2) config? Why in HELL would it assume anyone would want to change? And why in HELL does the "help message" about choosing where to write GRUB assume the list of choices means a damn thing to someone other than a sysadmin?

      GRUB 2: NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME!

    4. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by AlbertinaJane · · Score: 1

      I did. It failed so nice :) But it's a bliss to reinstall and then put /home and /etc stuff back to its place.

    5. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh dear... shades of the fun I had going from KDE 1.2 to KDE 2... I had to create a new user account and copy the config files across from there before KDE would load properly for me in my account... that was back going from Mandrake 7.2 to 8.0... oh happy days... praying the monitor detect wouldn't fry the monitor when setting up X.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    6. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      I upgraded one desktop system from Jaunty -> Karmic -> Lucid in a single sitting without any issues -- though I then manually uninstalled all the social-media crap than comes with Lucid. That aside, everything went well.

      However, I have another system running Hardy, as my MythTV system, that I'm hesitant to upgrade as the "do-release-upgrade" program wants to install all the "recommended" software, meaning 850 more packages that I don't want or need (like GNOME), even with the "-m server" option. I've considered manually updating my apt sources and doing an apt dist-upgrade, but have read "bad things" about that approach. I'm loath to do a fresh installation. At the moment I following the mantra: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    7. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Yep, big upgrades suck. I did that a few years ago with Ubuntu. I don't remember what versions either. I rebooted, and it hung. :(

      I use Debian, and I can do upgrade parts. Even dist-upgrade work.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If you do not understand what you are doing maybe you should learn a little about what you are doing first?

    9. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why this year isn't the year of the linux desktop.

    10. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      I did an in-place upgrade of the Netbook Remix from 9.10 to 10.4. Didn't have a single problem. This was on a 9" Acer Aspire One 150

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    11. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by alexhs · · Score: 1

      You don't need to go that far.

      You can simply remove your .gconf directory after the installation (of course, you will need to use the text console, or another window manager that handles updates more gracefully).

      I personnally remove .gconf* .gnome* .gtk*, just to be sure.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    12. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes.

      Cupsd will utterly fail.

      you need to re-issue....

      sudo apt-get install --reinstall cups

      to get it working again.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Short conclusion: remove the flash player package before upgrading, or you'll get a broken packages, and the cleaning up stage of the upgrade will fail.
      The system seems to work okay, but the package manager is confused.

    14. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked great for me... on a server install

    15. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I didn't have this problem, prior to the upgrade I had trouble printing PDFs too, it would print one page every five minutes, boy was that annoying, not on 10.04 it just works. I did have to reinstall the printer however.

    16. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by mindbrane · · Score: 1
      Last Saturday I was really bored and got around to updating my acer Aspire One N270, netbook running 9.10. I was watching the upgrades when I noticed the Ubuntu 10.04 install button, so, bored, I did what my dad would do and clicked on it. It took 5 hours to complete and so far I've had only the one painful issue. Mauve, really mauvy purple with white shinny highlights. What's next? brightly coloured ponies and unicorns? I run a lot of stuff on my little netbook and so far so good. Maybe Ubuntu has become the, for now, ultimate net OS. just say'n.

      Although it wasn't an 8.04 LTS to 10.04 LTS upgrade it went well and runs well. Long may it run.

      --
      ideopath @ play
    17. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I generally quite agree with you. However I've upgraded Jaunty > Karmic > Lucid without trouble on two boxes. Possibly Ubuntu is finally getting the hang of the upgrade method, so like the OP I'd like to hear how well the LTS > LTS upgrade is going.

      [Minor note Karmic > Lucid took _forever_, compared to the Jaunty > Karmic upgrade. If anyone is thinking it's about time they did a nuke'n'pave, then I recommend doing it for Lucid just because you'll be back online much sooner.)

    18. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by sideshow · · Score: 1

      I did this with no problems. However, I did it on a "server" type machine so I didn't have to worry about X, GNOME, etc.

      --

      Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    19. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Something with the aim of user friendliness (like Ubuntu) shouldn't require an in-depth knowledge of the Linux/x86 boot methods. It ought to "just work". If it doesn't, then the upgrade routine isn't reading for release, and that section of the upgrade should never have been attempted. There should be a way for a power-user to force the upgrade, but it shouldn't be presented to a regular user during the "easy" upgrade process.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    20. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by HBoar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or just let the installer choose for itself. There is no reason why you have to manually choose where to install anything in *buntu now.

    21. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I upgraded, using the Alternative install CD. There were a couple hiccups - the biggest of which is that my Slickness Black theme is somewhat borked. I don't need or want a "colorful" desktop, since I'm colorblind. Purple? That's my very last choice of a color scheme - can't tell purple from violet from lavender, or any other blue-red blend. But, the system works fine. I was surprised that the upgrade downloaded a few hundred meg of data during upgrade, despite the fact that the CD image was mounted, but, ehhh. A few hours (on my extremely slow DSL) and it was over.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    22. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You need to familiarize yourself with Grub2 and the Grub2 boot disk. All that you had to do was to reinstall Grub2. Please, let me draw your attention to the fact that I said Grub2, and I did not say Grub. There is a difference. Beginning with Karmic, Ubuntu uses Grub2. No need to nuke an installation because you put the boot loader in the wrong place.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    23. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, you are perfectly correct. An operating system that doesn't hold the hands of the incompetent will never earn any market share. Kinda like manual transmissions - if it can't do all the work for the mindless zombie, it won't sell.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    24. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Okay, so maybe I'm being a bit of a nitpicker here...

      but do ANY of the Gnome/KDE folks use more than one machine? Because I do, and my home directory can be used on any number of different versions of Gnome/KDE and distros.

      Can't these guys figure out a way so that if I log into machine X, it doesn't bork the menu system because it has a config from machine Z?

      WTF?

      Hello, this is only a capability Unix/Linux has had since 1986/1993!!

      Yeah, yeah, I could write it myself, but what are the odds I alone would get it A) accepted B) right for more use-cases??

    25. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what its worth, Ive upgraded from Jaunty to Karmic to Lucid.

      In Jaunty and Karmic I had some problems with PULSEAUDIO, I either didnt had time or was lazy to fix those problems, I upgraded to Lucid and those problems got fixed, also it runs very smooth and fast, Ive been able to play several games on WINE without any problem at all, as for now, those are the biggest differences Ive noticed in comparison to the previous non LTS releases in which those problems would arise and would be difficult to solve (at least for me and my novice Linux/Ubuntu knowledge).

    26. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      though I then manually uninstalled all the social-media crap than comes with Lucid

      please, please tell me how to remove the stupid useless envelope icon without removing all the useful ones like battery, bluetooth, and volume.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    27. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ur use a different username / home directory, then you can even do this from nautilus.

    28. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you were lucky. 7 out of 7 pc's I upgraded from 9.10 to 10.04 had this problem. All did use HP printer drivers... This could be a cause. All I know is that there is a LOT of people on the net that have the same problem. and it's a brain dead simple fix.. force a reinstall of Cups.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    29. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      An operating system that doesn't hold the hands of the incompetent will never earn any market share.

      Irony: no operating system to date can or ever will do this without a Fisher-Price GUI.

    30. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Lets assume a machines lifecycle is five years. It used to be more like three but machines lifecycles have got stretched in recent times.

      With windows the manufacturer usually installs the latest version unless specifically requested not to. Given that microsofts lifecycle policy promises 7 years of security support overlap between releases and that third party app vendors generally support older releases (it's only in the last few years that i've seen apps dropping support for 9x and 2K) it is quite practical to keep running the same version of windows for the lifecycle of the machine.

      With ubuntu LTS if you want to keep security support you will most likely have to upgrade twice over a computers five year lifecycle. Also most software comes via the distro so if you want more recent application software you have to upgrade the whole OS to get it.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    31. Re:Upgrading in place from the previous LTS? by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      I upgraded from 9.10, and I left the "Notification area" in place but removed the "indicator applet". It works quite well enough as it is.

      I tried using indicator applet, but I don't want that envelope either, I use webmail already. It's a common complaint, I don't doubt, but the Ubuntu folk aren't about to listen, so we solve the problems ourselves.

      P.S. Regression: can't switch pointer schemes away from "default pointer". I'm going to go look to see if that's already on launchpad.

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
  6. A solid review by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never read Tom's any more, but maybe I'll start. I appreciate that they tracked down the cause of a performance regression between Hardy and Lucid. The only other site that routinely benchmarks Linux distributions is Phoronix, and those guys are prone to just throwing weird results out there with no explanation. The number of inexplicable, unrepeatable benchmark results posted over at Phoronix is huge and ever-growing. This benchmark from Tom's is much more useful.

    1. Re:A solid review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I upgraded from Karmic and it was all good except for thunderbird 3. That made the whole system unusable every time I started it up. Fortunately I was able to downgrade back to the thunderbird 2 package from karmic and everything is running superbly now.

    2. Re:A solid review by somenickname · · Score: 1

      Phoronix is great for information and their benchmark suite is excellent but, I agree that their benchmark results have to be taken with a grain of salt. I actually have a feeling that the reason their benchmark results are so dubious is actually *because* they have such an easy, automated benchmark suite. They just run the benchmarks, it generates a webpage and they annotate it. Some of my specific gripes with their benchmark results are:

      1) Declaring a winner on very small margins. Unless you are actively optimizing software on a completely quiescent box, a 1% difference in average performance doesn't make something faster. You chalk that up to noise and just call it a draw.
      2) Declaring a winner on baffling results. When you see a number that you don't expect, you don't just say, "Odd. That's really slow." You investigate and find the cause of the odd results and fix it if possible. Then you post the baffling results if still applicable and the better results like Toms did.
      3) Declaring a winner for a limited or useless test. If A is faster than B using a filesize of C, that's interesting if I work with files of size C. If I don't, then that number is meaningless to me. If you are benchmarking for user-grade machines, you have to find the subset of the dataset that is relevant and test it's min/max/average/medium.

      I probably have more gripes but, that's the gist of it. I read phoronix daily but, I always feel like their benchmarks and comments on the benchmarks do an injustice to whatever things they are trying to compare. The Toms benchmark was a bit better but, rarely have I seen online benchmarks not do #1.

    3. Re:A solid review by helios17 · · Score: 1

      I've been using Mint since the 7 release. It's obvious that Mint is more than just a cosmetic release of Ubuntu...They tend to fix "bugs" that the Ubuntu Devs ignore for two releases or more. The silly Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to logout was never removed (or reinstated) and they've vastly improved their software installer as compared to the Ubuntu offering. It just goes to show what a community can do when they take pride in their work. Not to mention that I don't have to add flash, Java, etc. I'm just sayin'...

      --
      Windows assumes you are an idiot...Linux demands proof.
  7. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Heywood+J.+Blaume · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why was this modded troll? AC may or may not be demonstrably wrong, but was he trolling?

  8. It's working quite well under VirtualBox by Virtucon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have four Guest Instances of 10.04 running alongside 9.10 under VirtualBox 3.2, no problems to report. You can see the difference especially in responsiveness vs. 9.10 in terms of app startup, system shutdown/startup and the GUI is definitely more polished. I did like the old "Human" motif better with 9.10 but for what I'm using it for, it's been solid.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  9. Linux Mint derivative by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    I'll wait until Linux Mint makes a release based on ubuntu:

    I've been recommending it to friends as a nicer, friendlier, greener (yes, it's also Irish) Ubuntu that is not shy about providing support for proprietary video drivers and Adobe flash out of the box.

    mint green > aubergine

    I still run Debian testing on my primary box, though.

    1. Re:Linux Mint derivative by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I have to agree that Mint is a pretty easy to use distro. I had no idea the founder was Irish. :)

    2. Re:Linux Mint derivative by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ha, I didn't have to wait long... Linux Mint 9 (based on Ubuntu 10.04) came out of beta last week. And I've still been installing new machines with version 8 since then :-P

      Well, thanks for the reminder!

    3. Re:Linux Mint derivative by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      can linux mint be installed like wubi? it is one of the greatest features of ubuntu, imo.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    4. Re:Linux Mint derivative by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      It's a feature complete clone of Ubuntu.

      (This means the answer is yes, and I don't have to look it up to find out either)

    5. Re:Linux Mint derivative by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      um no. i googled about it but it seems there is no wubi equivalent in mint. my earlier comment was not very clear. wubi is a separate windows program that installs ubuntu inside a virtual hdd stored under ntfs as a huge file. so it is not exactly a feature of ubuntu.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    6. Re:Linux Mint derivative by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      The Windows installer "Mint4Win", which is a fork of Wubi, is included on the Live CD and allows Linux Mint to be installed from within Microsoft Windows. The operating system can then be removed as any other Windows software using the Windows Control Panel). This method requires no partitioning of a Windows user's hard drive. It is only useful for Windows users; it is not meant for permanent installations as it incurs a slight performance loss.

      You were reading about the hardy mint version. It's there, just a different name.

    7. Re:Linux Mint derivative by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      amazing! thanks!

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  10. Reset Gnome by Das+Auge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I did an upgrade and had almost no problems. I did have to re-config grub2 to dual-boot into Windows-7.

    After a couple of weeks, I did something that made my bottom panel disappear. I couldn't get it back, so I deleted my .gnome and .gnome2 folders. Holy cow, did that make a difference. The windows became so much more responsive and features that I didn't have, appeared (I can't remember what they are off the top of my head). So if you are having any problems with GNOME, delete those folders and enjoy. Keep in mind that you'll need to reset all GNOME-related settings such as the desktop picture, panels, and such.

    1. Re:Reset Gnome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After upgrading, both my panels disappeared, but only for the other accounts on the machine. I can killall gnome-panel and get them to come back, but that's not exactly a fix. I've deleted all .gnome* folders and nothing changed. The only bugs I can find in Launchpad say FIXED. This isn't the behavior I expect from an LTS release.

  11. Intel 3D performance by wrook · · Score: 1

    Given the recent work on the integrated Intel graphics drivers it would have been nice to see some benchmarks. My impression is that it is better, but it would be nice to have some numbers.

  12. test until it makes sense. by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    i like how they just fucked with it until the unigine tropics benchmark finally made sense.

    like the average person is going to know anything of the nvidia driver version and tweaking the compiz fusion config.

    1. Re:test until it makes sense. by oatworm · · Score: 1

      Right, which is why they did it. The average person will see that it's slower, grumble in frustration, and walk away. Tom's Hardware, on the other hand, went the extra mile, dug into the bits, figured out what the problem wasn't (Nvidia driver), figured out what the problem was (Compiz), then explained how they fixed it.

    2. Re:test until it makes sense. by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      the antithesis of the "out of the box" experience test.

      if 8.04 had been given a thorough optimization, it would have been faster too.

    3. Re:test until it makes sense. by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      For benchmark reviews the defaults should be used, agreed.
      OTOH, if Windows users can fuck with registry files, start-up entries and flip-flop virus scanners as often like the shoes of the same name, then we can tweak compiz fusion config :)

  13. Hope they fixed sound (pulseaudio). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    On my laptop the headphone jack sense was broken in 9.04 (jaunty) in various ways -- the internal speakers wouldn't mute when the headphones were plugged in or sometimes the internal speakers would go from muted to on after listening with headphones for ~10-20 minutes. IIRC from the help forums, there was a problem with how the developers built the package. I couldn't be bothered to try compiling the sound system myself since I could get by not needing realiable sound. Anyway, I'm looking forward to trying a live CD version of Lynx.

    1. Re:Hope they fixed sound (pulseaudio). by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      don't raise your hopes. sound worked on my laptop flawlessly in 9.10 but in 10.04 there are stutters and error notifications all the time. i can't understand how they could break a perfectly working thing in a newer version. if i upgrade my program, i would not touch the parts that already work.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  14. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1
    Well, GP said:

    As I understand it, the final verdict of the review is that it really hasn't improved that much...

    The last paragraphs of the review said:

    The bottom line is that this operating system installed flawlessly on all five of our test systems. It also performed quite well, showing both significant and incremental improvements in most areas over the previous Long Term Support release. The stacked feature set, unparalleled ease-of-use, rock-solid stability, and heavy coat of polish make Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx the most approachable Linux OS to date.

    So, it is without an ounce of trepidation that we are unseating the now one year-old Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope and calling Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx the desktop Linux distro king.

  15. I do something similar... by ebbomega · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But it's a little bit in-between.

    I do a fresh install, but maintain my /home partition as-is. I make my regular username my default root-accessible (via gksu/sudo) one, but then once I've installed, I create a new user named after the release (hardy, jaunty, lucid, etc.). Then, I log into my default account. Using the icons on my desktop, I then install my non-standard apps (audacity, gimp, vlc, easytag, nicotine, etc.).

    Once I've basically got my computer up to where I was before, then I log into my version-specific account which creates a fresh profile, and I start to check out the differences - themes, feature updates, new defaults - for all my apps I regularly use. If I see anything I like, I hop over to my default profile and adjust. If I see anything I don't, then I just don't bother changing my current settings.

    Has worked fantastic for my last 3 upgrades (please note that I never go with mid-release upgrades.... while the .04 series almost always include a ton of improvements, I find more often than not the .10 upgrades will break at least one thing).

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
    1. Re:I do something similar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fantastic"? Not an adjective I would use to describe the process you outlined. "Byzantine" comes to mind. Does "pain-in-the-ass" count as one adjective?

  16. Intel Video Finally Working Well by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For the last several releases, Ubuntu has dealt very poorly with Intel video cards. Now to be fair, this isn't entirely their fault; they were impacted by the switch to DRI2, GEM, Modesetting, etc. However they haven't handled it gracefully. I have three systems -- HTPC (Dell Studio Hybrid), laptop (Lenovo SL400), and a netbook (Acer Aspire One) -- that use the i915 driver, and both 9.04 and 9.10 were horrible (no 3D acceleration, poor 2D performance, etc.). In fact 9.10 (and possibly 9.04) required me to pass a kernel parameter to disable modesetting (i915.modeset=0) to even get to a GUI to install.

    I realize there were workarounds and hacks, to get reasonable performance from the Intel cards with the previous two releases, but nothing I found seemed simple or fully addressed the issue. This was largely due to some of the fixes requiring newer kernels and since Ubuntu isn't a rolling release distro, that would make fixing things much more difficult. My personal laptop (T400, also with a i915 video card) runs Gentoo, and I had fixed all the Intel video issues several months earlier.

    Fortunately 10.04 seems to have gotten everything back to working well again, and hopefully all the changes will be worth it in the future.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    1. Re:Intel Video Finally Working Well by sleepy_sanchez · · Score: 1

      I still get random X window system crashes on lucid lynx. I remember them being related to intel driver(i915). And I didn't have them on previous releases.

    2. Re:Intel Video Finally Working Well by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      Actually there were some last-minute commits that screwed up those of us with Intel "Ironlake" graphics. Users of the ThinkPad X201 unfortunately need to pass kernel parameters to the live cd and must patch their kernels to make the installed system work.

    3. Re:Intel Video Finally Working Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm typing from 10.04. It's great. I haven't been using it for very long but from what I can see, in every department, it blows MAC OSX, and Windows 7 out of water.

    4. Re:Intel Video Finally Working Well by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      9.10 and 10.04 both work flawlessly with my intel integrated graphics. actually, ubuntu has always played well with intel as far back as i can remember.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    5. Re:Intel Video Finally Working Well by mjwx · · Score: 1

      For the last several releases, Ubuntu has dealt very poorly with Intel video cards. Now to be fair, this isn't entirely their fault; they were impacted by the switch to DRI2, GEM, Modesetting, etc. However they haven't handled it gracefully. I have three systems -- HTPC (Dell Studio Hybrid), laptop (Lenovo SL400), and a netbook (Acer Aspire One) -- that use the i915 driver, and both 9.04 and 9.10 were horrible (no 3D acceleration, poor 2D performance, etc.). In fact 9.10 (and possibly 9.04) required me to pass a kernel parameter to disable modesetting (i915.modeset=0) to even get to a GUI to install.

      9.04 and 9.10 ran fine on my Lenovo R400 (Intel IGM 4500HD, C2D 2.1 GHz, 2 GB RAM) better then Windows Vista and even XP for most web browsing. I did not encounter this problem, not saying you didn't have it but there may be a bigger problem at work (specific HW or FW revision perhaps).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Intel Video Finally Working Well by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My Acer Aspire D250 (GMA950) went from working (without compiz) on 9.10 to overheating and locking up all the time on 10.04. From where I'm sitting, Lucid breaks intel video. I actually went back to XP on that machine because Ubuntu has never provided a satisfactory experience, and still doesn't. Also, I would like Ubuntu to stop trashing the ATI video built into the R690M chipset in my Gateway netbook, but I don't know if there's any distribution that works properly with that hardware. I may have to revert that machine to Windows also if the -ati driver doesn't support it soon, I'm tired of getting video corruption with scrolling.

      Every time I try to use anything other than nVidia with Linux I have serious problems. You'd think I'd learn my lesson, and never ever buy anything with anything but nVidia graphics. I think I may finally be there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Insanely impressed with this release. by ebbomega · · Score: 5, Informative

    #1 feature that has me blown away: full iPod Touch/iPhone support in Rhythmbox, without jailbreaking. Seriously, this was the one thing that kept me from buying an iPod touch for so long... I eventually decided to just bite the bullet and find _SOME_ fix that works... ultimately going with just using iTunes within Virtualbox. But then I hooked up my iTouch after upgrading to Lucid and was about to go launch Virtualbox and test that was still working fine... but saw my iTouch, with its designated name, listed in Rhythmbox....

    I'm sitting there going, "No.... they didn't...." so I try to drag one of the songs in my library over to my iPod.... and boosh! They did!

    Only problem I found though was that when I moved a couple tracks over that had "Unknown" as album title, it actually made everything else with "Unknown" as the album title inaccessible on the iPod. seems though this only has to do with stuff that was added via iTunes... so if I remove the song and then re-add it in rhythmbox, it's perfectly fine.

    It's a bit of a weird bug, but easily worked past, and now means that I no longer need to keep going into Windows/iTunes to load stuff onto my iPod. Great jerb!

    Also, while I'm not a _huge_ fan of the new default theme (window control buttons on the right pls) I did end up picking one of the new themes that suited my tastes, and I honestly am not looking back at all. I keep saying this every time I upgrade, but best linux yet.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
    1. Re:Insanely impressed with this release. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I still have a problem with this. While RythmBox supports copying files to/from the iPod just fine in this release, it doesn't have a sync function. If you want to move a file from the computer to the iPod, or vice versa, then it's a drag and drop afair.

      Better than nothing, but I still prefer being able to plug in the iPod before I jump in the shower and have all my music purchases from the night before as well as any new podcasts transferred over before I dash out the door for work.

      That feature alone is why I'm running Windows XP via VirtualBox in seamless mode, solely to run iTunes.

      I'm hoping that when I upgrade my phone to something Android based later this year I can dump that (as some other Linux players, like Banshee, do support syncing, but don't support the newest iPods).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:Insanely impressed with this release. by SEAL · · Score: 1

      window control buttons on the right pls

      gconf-editor
      apps->metacity->general
      button_layout=:maximize,minimize,close

    3. Re:Insanely impressed with this release. by SEAL · · Score: 1

      er sorry, make that :minimize,maximize,close

      And then log out/in or restart X or whatever.

    4. Re:Insanely impressed with this release. by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see why Gnome must necessarily hide this sort of stuff in an obscure gconf setting. It's almost like Microsoft and the obscure registry settings.
      In KDE, you right-click the title bar->configure window behavior->windows->buttons, and you can drag all the standard buttons and a few extra (sticky button, on top button, keeb below button, etc.) around the bar.

    5. Re:Insanely impressed with this release. by SEAL · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Also if they're going to arbitrarily change something like this, after many many releases with it on the other side, they should present a dialog to let the user configure it during installation / upgrade.

    6. Re:Insanely impressed with this release. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm very, very, very happy that Rythmbox has no sync function, as that drives me crazy in iTunes. Well, iTunes in general makes me lose it, but that is another story.

      However. you can just drag-n-drop your whole library to your iPod, and Rythmbox will happily only transfer what isn't there already.

  18. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by SkyDude · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why was this modded troll? AC may or may not be demonstrably wrong, but was he trolling?

    No, but that's the inequity of the /. mod system. Free speech is not a right on /.

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  19. I experienced many bugs in 10.04 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have noticed many small bugs on Ubuntu 10.04, mostly dealing with compiz with dual monitors. I was able to fix every gotcha but once again I had to go to the Internet about 20 different times to get the system just right.

  20. Lynx Browser by c0d3r · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Last time i checked, gmail is the only major web site that works with Lynx. I make all my AJAX web applications Lynx compatible, and you should too. Any word on when lynx is going to support Java applets or Flash swfs? I can't wait until they release Duke Nukem Forever.

    1. Re:Lynx Browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java is supported you just have to install it and there is a workaround using mozplugger and wine to get shockwave files running.

  21. Very nice release by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    In general, and for me, Canonical has released the best version yet. Hopefully it will continue to just get better.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  22. Hey by mewshi_nya · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've noticed it to be running a little faster than 9.10 did, on my Lenovo IdeaPad S10... so... looks good :) And this is with all the bells and whistles turned on.

    1. Re:Hey by adpads · · Score: 1

      Agreed - on a Lenovo s10, going to Lucid from Fedora 12 is like what it must have been going from Vista to Windows 7, for Windows people - waking up from an ice age. I installed fedora 13 on release day yesterday and couldn't have made a better choice than to junk it and go for Lucid.
      I have it installed on all my systems now - it's a silver bullet for all those bugs that various distros had on various hardware. Hands down the best linux yet.

  23. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by retchdog · · Score: 1

    What do you mean? Sound magically works again, and stopped fading out into static after 10 seconds of use.

    On the downside, there is now no obvious way to get a panel volume control applet. (sigh) At least I'm ahead on average!

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  24. Also by Das+Auge · · Score: 2, Informative

    Then also try deleting your .gconf .gconfd .metacity folders.

    1. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was it! Strange how that isn't even suggested in bugs or on the forums. Thanks a bunch!

  25. You can't get to there, from here by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    Yes, this is something that really should be a central part of the review. The only possible reason (apart from scoffing at how crude and unevolved the older version is) for comparing Ubuntu 10 with 8.04 is to quantify the benefits of migration. Since it appears to be impossible (without a backup, wipe, virgin install and then days spent rebuilding all your customisations and apps and settings) there should at least be a ote to that effect.

    Since the only major performance improvement is from going EXT3 - EXT4, there's no point in even trying an "in place" upgrade. It's a gaping hole in Ubuntu's release and something you'd'a hoped someone would have considered. I wonder why they forget about us 8.04 users?

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:You can't get to there, from here by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      i'm no EXT expert, but isnt EXT4 basically EXT3.1? perhaps it is possible to upgrade a partition in place to EXT4 (might require unmounting etc..)

      This is probably far beyond the average ubuntu-user, but a small automated script on next-boot could handle this...

      As for forgetting about 8.04 users, ubuntu is like that, short sighted bastards...

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    2. Re:You can't get to there, from here by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      what's really amusing is that they push the LTS as suitable for business users (even selling support packages) and people are going to be really upset to discover that to go from one LTS to the next requires a nuke and repave!!!

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    3. Re:You can't get to there, from here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Since the only major performance improvement is from going EXT3 - EXT4, there's no point in even trying an "in place" upgrade. It's a gaping hole in Ubuntu's release and something you'd'a hoped someone would have considered. I wonder why they forget about us 8.04 users?

      Since most of the performance benefits of ext4 can be had by mounting ext3 as ext4, I wonder why you're bitching about this when it would take less time to edit your fstab?

      Nobody forgot about you, there's no tool as yet to convert an ext3 fs into an ext4 fs. And even if there was, if it failed they'd have summoned satan all over your data, and alienated everyone who is allergic to backups. Better to just force the issue. If you have an external hard disk larger than the partition you have to remake, it's fairly trivial to make a bootable backup and do the work from there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. volume control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you missing again? I have a panel volume control applet that installed by default under 10.4/gnome. Staring at it. Note: I did a net upgrade, not a wipe and reinstall.

  27. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by moonbender · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Violation of freedom of speech: deleting posts, which didn't happen. Exercising your freedom of ignoring other people's speech: browsing at +2.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  28. My experiences... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    Netbook Remix has been running like a dream since I upgrade to 10.4lts on my EEE 1000 40G.

    Ubuntu 32bit 10.4 has been running like a champ on my fun Atom desktop PC.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  29. Went Back to 9.04 by RiffRaff06078 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I will give 10.04 another shot at some point in the future, this time with a fresh install rather than an upgrade, but I ran into so many bugs, crashes, and lack of compatibility that I switched back to 9.04. I am a huge fan of Ubuntu, and I hope this was just an upgrade glitch, but for now, 10.04 is on my back burner.

  30. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Other big bugs exist.

    GUI browsing of SMB networks is still borked out of the box. Cups fails when doing an upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04 you haveto force a --reinstall of cups to fix it.

    Several other things as well.

    It's better, but still has some serious show stoppers for non linux guru people. My wife likes it as her only OS but only because I fixed SMB browsing and the Cups problem.

    Dont get me wrong, I think it's far more stable than Windows 7, but it's not perfect and there are big enough "oopsies" that they need to fix them and release 10.04.1 right away.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  31. I like it. However.. by arndawg · · Score: 1

    It's noticeably slower on my old laptop (512mb ram). Was originally a 9.04 -> 9.10 and now 10.04. I recommend at least 1 gig if you're going to try this.

  32. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the downside, there is now no obvious way to get a panel volume control applet.

    Weird, mine came pre-installed.

    Try adding gnome-volume-control-applet to your startup applications.

  33. It's a nice o/s by EmagGeek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But, if by "made progress" they mean "slowed down," then I'd say it has progressed tremendously since 8.04.

  34. Last Advice by Das+Auge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Glad to help!

    My last bit of advice is to watch the video on YouTube from gotbletu. He has tons of Ubuntu how-to videos. He's slightly profane, but very informative.

  35. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They? Canonical is not so upstream friendly when it comes to Linux OS (== kernel) or it ecosystem. Canonical neither does support upstream so well when it comes the desktop use.

    Correct me, but it looked like you did not mean with "they" the upstream who actually _developes_ the software what Canonical _just use_ for Ubuntu. "They" (== the upstream) has done lots of things in first place correctly. Canonical has just ruined lots of things trying to be king of the hill, and failed on it.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3385088017824733336#

    Canonical is for Linux like Microsoft is for competitors....

  36. Everything is relative by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    It beats the hell out of XP and that's good enough for me. Thank you, Ubuntu, you've made two aging/underpowered machines suddenly useful again.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  37. I use the Kubuntu 10.04 version instead by Rick17JJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use Kubuntu 10.04 which is the KDE version of Ubuntu 10.04. I installed it last week and it seems to be working perfectly. I chose the alternate install version of the AMD 64 version of Kubuntu 10.04. As most of you probably already know, Ubuntu uses the Gnome desktop environment, whereas Kubuntu uses the KDE desktop environment. With Linux you get several choices in desktop environments.

    Being somewhat nervous about upgrading, I kept my old version of Kubuntu 9.10 and installed a fresh clean copy of Kubuntu 10.04 onto a different partition. That way I knew that I could always go back to my older version, if I needed to.

    I am one of the few people who insists on using different wallpaper for each of my virtual desktops. After installing Kubuntu 10.04, I had trouble figuring out how to get it to allow me to use different wallpaper for each of my virtual desktops. The way to enable doing that had changed since Kubuntu 9.10. I eventually found how to do that by clicking "Settings," then "System Settings," then "Desktop," then "Multiple Desktops," then checking the box for "different activity for each desktop." After doing that, I went to each virtual desktop and right clicked on a blank portion of the screen and then selected the "Desktop Activity Settings." I chose my favorite wallpaper from there.

    I don't care very much what default software they include with Kubuntu, since I know what programs I prefer and can quickly and easily download and install them for free from the official Ubuntu repositories. There are hundreds of free Linux programs available from the official repositories. I prefer to use Synaptic to download those programs, because it is an easy to use point and click front end for apt-get. I have not yet tried using KPackageKit instead, which comes already installed with Kubuntu. When I first installed Kubuntu 10.04, I used apt-get to download the Synaptic package manager, and then used Synaptic to install every other favorite free program of mine.

    I have been happily using Linux on the desktop for about 10 years now, but, I am not a computer expert. Kubuntu 10.04 seems to perform quite well on my several year old AMD 64 X2 4200+ computer. Unlike the earlier Kubuntu 9.10, I have not yet found any bugs or other problems with Kubuntu 10.04.

    1. Re:I use the Kubuntu 10.04 version instead by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I might have to try again. Upgraded from Karmic about a month ago when KDE broke in Karmic and it was still broken for me in Lucid. I'm currently using Gnome and hating it.

    2. Re:I use the Kubuntu 10.04 version instead by __aayejd672 · · Score: 1

      I installed Kubuntu 10.04 too, first as an upgrade from 9.10 which didnt go too well. Then re-installed from clean. Major show stopper for me was the fact that I couldn't log out without the entire system freezing and forcing a hard reset. I cant "just don't logout" as suggested by someone in #kubuntu as me and my girlfriend have separate accounts and use user switching. I tried for 3 days to narrow the problem down, different graphics drivers, manually setting xorg.conf, various other things but no joy - back to 9.10 for me, its rock solid.

      I also installed Ubuntu 10.04 just to see if the problem existed there too and it did, 3 days down the drain, disappointed is an understatement :(

    3. Re:I use the Kubuntu 10.04 version instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did the dist-upgrade from Kubuntu 9.10 to 10.04. After the reboot, KDE wouldn't start up. I finally figured out it was because Compiz was crashing, which I was running before the upgrade. I finally just did an "sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop", and since then things have been fine. I am no longer running Compiz, as the cube-desktop is included in KDE. Although I still prefer the way Compiz did switching between desktops. I am not a Gnome user, so I was really happy when I got KDE working again.

      I've been using Linux since 98 (Redhat 5.1) and I must say it's come such a long way. But I have never had an upgrade go perfectly smooth.. and I've done several of them over the years.

      I did find some oddities, like Unreal Tournament was so dark I could hardly see anything... messing with the brightness in the game didn't help. It may have been something with changes to OpenGL? I ended up just installing xgamma, and tweaking the gamma settings in a wrapper script. That's the great thing about Linux, there's always workarounds.

      The only other thing I've noticed is that my CPU is being used more consistently by kwin/firefox/plasma-desktop. Just small amounts, like 4-8%, but this is a quad-core system... I just notice it more in my gkrellm, and the cpus were idle most of the time on 9.10. Overall - love the new 10.04.
       

    4. Re:I use the Kubuntu 10.04 version instead by soppsa · · Score: 1

      With Linux you get several choices in desktop environments.

      Hi, welcome to slashdot.

  38. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's obviously trolling because 10.04 moved away from a brown theme to a stupid black and eggplant purple theme.

    I want the brown back. It was distinctive.

  39. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by retchdog · · Score: 1

    OK that did the trick. It doesn't show up anymore in the "add to panel" menu which threw me.

    Thanks.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  40. Next release will be awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Can't wait for MASTURBATING MONKEY!

    Though I hear that after the Z release, they will use human codenames starting at A again. My suggestion for the first one: Arrogant Asshole, followed by Bumbling Bastard, Conniving Cunt and Dastardly Dick.

    1. Re:Next release will be awesome. by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      Dastardly Dick.

      Then for the comming releases i suggest 'Malevolent Mutt' and 'Prevalent Pidgeon'

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    2. Re:Next release will be awesome. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Actually it's maverick meerkat.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  41. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    I totally agree, I was only responding to the parent who claimed no major bug fixes occurred.

  42. Only issues I have noticed that is relaly annoying by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    - NVidia drivers seem to sometimes flicker the screen for some reason. But then I reboot and t goes away. Then the next day it is back. Not sure what is going on with that.

    - iwl3945 driver does not resume properly after laptop suspend, about 50% of the time. If you encounter this, you have to do this sequence I have figured out with much experimenting

    - rmmod iwl3945
    - suspend again
    - resume again
    - modprobe iwl3945

    This seems to reset the card enough to fix the issue.

  43. ...or you could just use 'gnome-cleanup'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a tool for this; it's called 'gnome-cleanup':

    DESCRIPTION

              gnome-cleanup erases all GNOME user preferences, returning
              the user to the default look and feel. This can be used to
              undo undesired preference settings, or to correct the desk-
              top if the preferences become corrupt. The GNOME preference
              files are automatically recreated the next time the user
              logs into a GNOME session. By default this program erases
              the configuration files for the user running the command.

    In this case, it may not do exactly what you need, but in my experience it does the trick 99% of the time.

    1. Re:...or you could just use 'gnome-cleanup'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you mean gconf-cleaner?

  44. Upgrade madness by JSG · · Score: 1

    Ho hum another *buntu has turned up. It's version xy.z and it's called "Rancid Racoon" or something.

    Cue: "but my feature n doesn't do m" style comments followed by "upstream are wankers" etc etc.

    Later we get the "my filesystem was eaten by *buntu xy.z and I hate it"

    Followed by "Well I've upgraded from *buntu 0.0000000000001 incrementally to xy.z and it all works beautifully".

    Now substitute "*buntu" with any other pre packaged distro's name and this gets boring.

    I'm a pretty hardcore Gentoo user and we don't get these sort of announcements. Frankly I'm glad of that. I'm quite happy adding just a bit at a time. I'll grant you that my boot times are not as good as the latest iteration of say *buntu but I'll address that once I care about it.

    Dammit, why can't Gentoo and other source based distros get a regular "oooh, ahhhh" mention here! Out of the box I get a far more up to date Linux based experience than any other distro BY FAR.

    It does take a while to compile but that is a fair price to pay.

    *buntu is out of date already!

    1. Re:Upgrade madness by PBoyUK · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest that the reason Gentoo isn't mentioned more often around here is the slashdot groupthink predisposition to actually like Linux. If however we were forced to focus too much on Gentoo, and put up with more Gentoo users, it is likely that the backlash would so negatively affect the image of Linux as a whole that it'd fall out of favour, turning slashdot into an MS fanboy website, hence collapsing reality, time and space into a supermassive black hole that consumes the rest of the universe.

      At least until said black hole had finished its 'emerge universe', got on with another Big Bang and finally presented us with a command prompt to once again get something useful done. This process may however take many millions of years to complete, ironically similar to setting up a Gentoo system in the first place. Scary thought.

      Or even worse, what if God was a Gentoo user, creating the fabric of spacetime with ridiculous and troublesome optimization flags. Dark Matter? Nah. Just a bug from compiling with -O3.

  45. I'll upgrade if they've fixed the bug with OOo by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

    I've done a test install, but I noticed there's a problem with Open Office where if I enable the quickstarter, Ubuntu won't shutdown! I have to right click the quickstarter icon and get it quit that way, and *then* the OS will shutdown.

    Also, no uber-important, but the same quickstarter icon has a white background. And before you say, "well that's because the new theme is dark", I currently use 9.10 with the New Wave theme which is also dark.

  46. Feisty Fanboi say: by Drunkulus · · Score: 0

    I heard there was once a text based browser called Lynx! I'd love to try that, is there an emulator to run it?

  47. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

    The bottom line is that this operating system installed flawlessly on all five of our test systems

    Maybe they should have tried a few real-world scenarios. Maybe upgrading a system that was running 8.04 on a RAID-5 array. ...but that would have skewed their 'ubuntu is awesome' stats.

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  48. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by darkpixel2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Violation of freedom of speech: deleting posts, which didn't happen. Exercising your freedom of ignoring other people's speech: browsing at +2.

    Deleting posts != free speech violation.

    You have the right to free speech. You don't have a right to post on Slashdot--a network owned by someone else, and more than you'd have the right to spray paint a message on your neighbors house. It wouldn't be a violation if he repainted his house. If you want free speech on the web, go buy your own domain name, load your own discussion or blog software onto your own server.

    That's what I do. Of course my free speech will last up until approximately 5 requests a second, then my old POS server will catch on fire.

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  49. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

    What do you mean? Sound magically works again, and stopped fading out into static after 10 seconds of use.

    On the downside, there is now no obvious way to get a panel volume control applet. (sigh) At least I'm ahead on average!

    Try siv (or maybe it's 'pysiv'). That's what I use--works well. Simple slider bar that floats on top of everything else so I can easily change the volume while watching videos.

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  50. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    So, install a brown theme, you dipstick. You need not even be a guru. System > preference > appearance > get more themes online If that is to difficult for you, then you're not even running a Linux distro, you're just a troll.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  51. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the talk of upgrade and server blues [by those that had them] and nobody mentioned Archlinux yet.

  52. Maybe the most irritating thing by mrwolf007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    is having the buttons on the left.
    To fix that:
    open console or press ALT-F2
    type "gconf-editor"
    go to "apps->metacity->general"
    edit the key "button_layout" to "menu:minimize,maximize,close"
    No longer get nerved by the changed layout.

    1. Re:Maybe the most irritating thing by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      i have stopped using ubuntu because of irrational, stupid changes like this.there is also the envelope icon that takes up space on the top bar that you can't remove without also removing volume and bluetooth etc. yes you can have a separate applet for volume but then that icon does not match with the theme.
      even fucking windows is more customizable than this. gnome needs to die.kde is going in a much better direction with their plasmoid stuff.
      and shuttleworth and co have shown tremendous disregard for the community that has supported them. they did not bother to give a single reason for this fucking change.
      also, the windows in ubuntu look very ugly now, it appears that there is some sort of formatting error, with everything left justified.
      also the notification system is utter crap. for example if you lose your wlan signal it says disconnected. but if you move the cursor over the thing it becomes transparent! wtf! you should be able to click the notification and it should give you the networking options.
      on the other hand kubuntu and opensuse are amazing.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    2. Re:Maybe the most irritating thing by AlterRNow · · Score: 1

      Hear hear.

      I switched away from Ubuntu when they decided to pull this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/431091

      --
      The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    3. Re:Maybe the most irritating thing by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      same here, yesterday i installed Fedora 13 on my main machine, together with a lovely intel SSD. Havent had much time to try it all out, but so far it is really snappy.

      i do have my ubuntu 9.10 partition intact, but if all goes well that will get blown away in a few weeks i imagine..

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
  53. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by oakgrove · · Score: 1

    The official volume applet now is actually a part of the indicator applet. Add that to the panel and the volume will show up. The gnome-volume-manager-applet is the old one.

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  54. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by retchdog · · Score: 1

    that's a neg.

    I just get indicators for rhythmbox (no volume control there); display settings; battery meter; and a weird and useless envelope icon with some useless options, like "set up mail" and "set up broadcast account".

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  55. Compiz Desktop Effects = Slow by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 1

    Page 11 was particularly interesting: 3D game graphics are 33% slower in Lucid due to Compiz.

  56. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    Dont get me wrong, I think it's far more stable than Windows 7

    well then you are wrong. they haven't been able to do sound properly which is perhaps the simplest thing to do. my sound card works without any driver in win7. but it does not in ubuntu. i would even say that windows 7 has a higher uptime than ubuntu now. there are so many crashes and nothing can come back after a crash. you HAVE to reboot forcefully. win7 otoh recovers itself even from a graphic card crash.

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  57. Works great on my old Toshiba by aqk · · Score: 0

    Works great on my old (OK- THREE years old) Toshiba Satellite with only one gig.
    A FREE showed very little swapspace being used, if any at all.
    If this keeps up, I just may remove the original Vista from the laptop!
    Not to mention a slow migration from NTFS to EXTx....

  58. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    sound is actually broken for me where it worked in 9.10(stupid random versioning). now there's stutters and if you play a song it never finishes. and then you can't even logout or shutdown, you have to open up a terminal and sudo halt. and what's up with the uac like thing that pops up randomly and asks for the password and DOES NOT TELL YOU WHICH PROGRAM YOU ARE GRANTING ACCESS TO!!
    and there is no way to get rid of the stupid envelope icon without also removing volume, bluetooth, battery and stuff.
    my anecdote is worth the same as your anecdote.(hint:zero)

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  59. gNewSense by xororand · · Score: 1

    The free (libre) derivative of Ubuntu should not be left unmentioned: gNewSense.

    Even if you don't use gNewSense, their homepage can serve as a guide for hardware shopping. They only list devices that work without non-free firmware or drivers.

    From their website:

    gNewSense is derived from Ubuntu, and thus has most of the same functionality. There are a number of differences though.

    • Non-free firmware removed from kernel in main*
    • Non-free firmware removed from linux-ubuntu-modules**
    • Builder, a tool to produce a distribution
    • Restricted removed
    • Multiverse removed
    • Ubuntu logos replaced
    • Universe enabled by default
    • Emacs, bsdgames, nethack and build-essential part of the default install
  60. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by FrangoAssado · · Score: 1

    I think it's clear they were talking about free speech on Slashdot, not the general constitutional right of free speech.

    Slashdot makes a point of never deleting comments and even allowing anonymous free speech.

  61. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

    I've been using win7 fairly heavily for half a year with zero crash problems. At this point, any fatal crashes are unacceptable for a primary desktop machine. The bar is much, much higher than it was back in the bad old days of Win98 and MacOS 9.

    I feel obliged to add that the best way to have a stable experience with Ubuntu (or Linux in general) is to match the hardware to it, and ensure proper support before buying/building your system. A little homework goes a long way.

  62. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    three of the four wifi cards i have dont work with it. nvidia drivers are broken in the install kernel. it was rushed... not enough qa. its great if it works for you... big if.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  63. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

    It's easier than that, just select the brown theme in Appearance. Don't have to download any extras.

    On the topic of default themes: I find it highly interesting to see what people choose in terms of leaving the default, or perhaps going to an earlier appearance (this was common when WinXP came out).

    The desire to change the window decor is not correlated directly to technical ability; rather, it's something about certain people being distracted/displeased by certain window decorations, and feeling the need to change them, period. What is that in people? Why can't we leave well enough alone?

  64. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

    broken for me where it worked in 9.10(stupid random versioning).

    The versioning is anything but random. It corresponds directly to the year (2009) and the month (October, the 10th month). Every single Ubuntu release follows this convention. Releases are on a six month cycle. Thus 10.04 is the April 2010 release.

  65. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAH! You read TFA!!

  66. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    routinely browsing SMB shares here, no problems at all.

    Can you elaborate why it's "borked" out of the box?

  67. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

    Which would be fine, if not for the constant hardware support regressions. Next time I get chance I'm going to spend another couple of hours trying to get my Canon ip2600 working again. Worked fine under the last Ubuntu.

    --
    Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
  68. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by IRWolfie- · · Score: 1

    I think canonical has said in the past they aren't focusing on the kernel but on things to make the os more user friendly

  69. Re:Only issues I have noticed that is relaly annoy by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    I'll second the iwl3945 issue, and it leaves my knetworkmanager applet telling me it's unmanaged. The ATI X1400 video driver seems to be buggy too... weird 16-bit-ish rendering on parts of the screen. It's all annoying enough that I'm typing this from Windows 7.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  70. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

    Dont get me wrong, I think it's far more stable than Windows 7, but it's not perfect and there are big enough "oopsies" that they need to fix them and release 10.04.1 right away.

    Okay. I'm fine with anyone liking Ubuntu (though I use Gentoo myself and my Ubuntu install is actually Kubuntu because I prefer KDE). But I have had fewer problems with Windows 7 than I've had with Ubuntu. Windows 7 has become my preferred operating system for vanilla tasks like word processing, etc. Excel, OneNote, Word. Like 'em all since the latest version of Office came out. Top stuff. I wouldn't want to develop on Windows and I don't. Linux is what I use for anything remotely likely coding - even web-design, and Linux is the backbone of my home network (i.e. my backup and media server). But Windows 7 has been excellent for me so far and most definitely *not* unstable.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  71. Glad to see that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tom's Hardware is getting into ubuntu benchmarking to give some competition to Larabel's soapbox.

  72. I confess, don't care for it by pugugly · · Score: 1

    My upgrade to 10.04 broke stuff I've gotten used to working without issue.

    Flash in Firefox broke
    gxine broke
    MythTV broke, but I'm fairly certain that was at best peripherally related (MythArchive Plugin killed the frontend)
    Various other smaller but irritating issues

    This is obvious stuff that should not have happened, certainly not in an LTS release. Forgivable - I have upgraded every six months for several years now with very little issue, but definitely screwy.

    Pug

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  73. For the record by ebbomega · · Score: 1

    That feature is set on a device-by-device basis. If you set it not to auto-sync on the first time you hook up your device to iTunes, then you can actually pull music from ANYBODY's library, not just your own.

    But yeah, I always used that feature, so the Rhythmbox interface works just perfectly for me.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  74. It's not that it's hidden... by ebbomega · · Score: 1

    It's just that nobody's programmed it to be user-friendly yet.

    Welcome to OSS. Don't like it, rewrite it.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  75. impressed but... by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    I'm very impressed with this release but I agree with Tom's Hardware about the location of the window min,max and close buttons. I downloaded and installed an "Ambiance-Right" theme to put the buttons back on the right side. Also, I don't know why TH made a big deal about the Ambiance theme and Skype...On Skype, just go into Options>General and change the Style to "GTK+". However, the theme makes tool-tips unreadable on Calibre

  76. Well, for my purposes by ebbomega · · Score: 1

    it suits me just fine.

    To be honest, I'd be happy with just keeping the home drive as-is - it's never given me issues (except in Amarok where every upgrade or so it would reset my library... that's what I get for using KDE apps... back to rhythmbox for me!). The only issues I ever got was when I just repointed my repositories to the new distro and upgraded that way.

    Only reason I go through the hassle of creating the new user is because I want to check out what neat new features have come in by default.

    That's what I like about linux - is that I can make it as much of a hassle as I'm comfortable with. If I really want to turn my brain off, then I can reformat my home dir every time. But I configure a lot of shit to work very specifically for me, so I don't want to have to keep reconfiguring everything. Seems a lot easier for me just to keep my home drive kicking around.

    Most windows apps wouldn't give me that option. If I wanted to move from XP to Win7 I'd have to completely copy over my Documents & Settings folder, and then start rearranging into the appropriate Win7 folders. Most of my shortcuts would stop working so I'd just have to make new ones. Just seems like a lot more of a headache for power users.

    My approach isn't for everybody, but I'm not everybody. I'm the kind of guy who uses shell scripts to clean up his mp3 collection, and likes to install programs at the commandline because synaptic takes too freaking long. Sure, you don't NEED it to run linux effectively, but I'm a stickler for doing things the quick advanced way.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  77. Rawr by complacence · · Score: 1

    A lot of changes happen for a reason. It takes about an hour to get used to this one. If you don't want to, it's trivial to revert to the previous setup.

    there is also the envelope icon that takes up space on the top bar that you can't remove without also removing volume and bluetooth etc.

    This is wrong. That's "indicator-applet". If you remove it from the panel, nothing else goes missing.

    windows is more customizable than this.

    Right. You call a system which offers several layers of customization (from top to bottom: GUI menus -> configuration files -> interpreted scripts -> recompilable source) less customizable than monolithic windows. Your world seems to be a strange but simple one.

    gnome needs to die.

    Ah, so you're just trolling?

    kde is going in a much better direction

    "There is only one right direction. That is to wherever I am. What other users might prefer is irrelevant.

    they did not bother to give a single reason for this fucking change.

    Mark Shuttleworth comments on the bug report and writes a blog.

    shuttleworth and co have shown tremendous disregard for the community

    "This is a difference between Ubuntu and several other community distributions. It may feel less democratic, but it's more meritocratic, and most importantly it means (a) we should have the best people making any given decision, and (b) it's worth investing your time to become the best person to make certain decisions, because you should have that competence recognised and rewarded with the freedom to make hard decisions and not get second-guessed all the time.

    "It's fair comment that this was a big change, and landed without warning. There aren't any good reasons for that, but it's also true that no amount of warning would produce consensus about a decision like this."

    (Shuttleworth, see also 202, 218, 388 and 410)

    the notification system is utter crap. for example [...] wtf! [...] it should give you [...]

    "Bugs in my OS? Unheard of!"

    i have stopped using ubuntu because of irrational, stupid

    This part of the sentence is true.

    1. Re:Rawr by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      A lot of changes happen for a reason. It takes about an hour to get used to this one.

      the blog entry you link to says:

      We’ve carefully placed all the panel indicators on the right, and we’ve carefully put the window controls and window title on the left. So now we have all this space on the right. As a pattern, it would fit to put the window indicators there.

      can you point out to me that part which tells the reason why they moved the window controls to the left. as far as i understand it they just did it because they want useless, irrational change for the sake of change. they could have let the window controls stay where they are and place the new fangled (imo, unnecessary) panel icons at the left. why make the users change their habit?
      also, it might have taken an hour for you, but i simply can't get used to it. every time i try to use it, it irritates me to rage.

      This is wrong. That's "indicator-applet". If you remove it from the panel, nothing else goes missing.

      are you a moron? try and remove the indicator applet. volume, bluetooth, and power are also gone. please try it before sounding off on someone who knows more about the topic.

      Right. You call a system which offers several layers of customization (from top to bottom: GUI menus -> configuration files -> interpreted scripts -> recompilable source) less customizable than monolithic windows. Your world seems to be a strange but simple one.

      i don't care. i can remove individual icons from the taskbar in any version of windows without changing anything else. i cannot do it in 10.04 ubuntu with the envelope icon. that makes it less customizable.
      from your quoted shuttleworth:

      There aren't any good reasons for that

      enough said.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  78. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    Nah, just skimmed the conclusion.

  79. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by retchdog · · Score: 1

    Anecdote: actually, the plurality of conflicting anecdotes indicate a very unstable software platform.

    For instance, I've run the exact same upgrade/install path on both my laptop and desktop. Nonetheless, the mechanics of icons are totally different on each. For instance, I get the stupid envelope icon on my desktop, but not on my laptop. Likewise, audio seems to work and not work at random for each person and each machine configuration. There are many more discrepancies; I've just given up keeping track...

    So, no, these anecdotes are not worthless. For one, they are more-or-less exactly why I don't recommend ubuntu (or any linux) to any casual computer user.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  80. Re:FINAL VERDICT: Not much has improved. by retchdog · · Score: 1

    to elaborate, your sound problem is exactly the one I had on 9.10 on my desktop, but 10.04 fixed.

    these are not unusual; anecdotes taken singularly may be worthless, but when the bug reports (as you can read on canonical's fora) show such a non-monotonic path of errors with such variability, there is something wrong.

    WinXP had its problems for sure, but I've never heard of anyone whose sound stopped working with SP1, came back with SP2, &c. (unless they were using some weird 3rd party software).

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky