Slashdot Mirror


Mysterious Radio Station UVB-76 Goes Offline

leathered writes "Tinfoil hatters around the world are abuzz that UVB-76, the Russian shortwave radio station that has been broadcasting its monotonous tone almost uninterrupted since 1982, has suddenly gone offline. Of course no one knows what the significance of this is, but best brush up on your drills just in case."

42 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Explanation: by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wiki:

    Another explanation for the constant buzzer is...radio waves are reflected from ionosphere inhomogeneities. Changes of an ionosphere state can be caused by solar geophysical or seismic events. This method involves comparing a continuous radio transmission which is reflected by the ionosphere with a stable basic generator. The continuously transmitted carrier frequency currently used for this research matches that of the Russian Buzzer (4.625 MHz).

    If the ionosphere can change state from seismic events, why couldn't seismic events be changed through manipulation of the ionosphere? It is indeed possible to control large-scale events with small-scale signals with phenomina such as resonance. What of all of the earthquakes which seem to hit the people we don't like, providing opportunities to rebuild and sieze their resources as part of the growing trend of disaster capitalism, the ultimate way to make money and spread influence without declaring war?

    And why is there no comparison to HAARP in that article?! From the HAARP wiki:

    The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, the University of Alaska and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).Its purpose is to analyze the ionosphere and investigate the potential for developing ionospheric enhancement technology for radio communications and surveillance purposes (such as missile detection)...The current working IRI was completed in 2007, and its prime contractor was BAE Advanced Technologies.

    Which is a big, big military industrial comglomerate.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to change the state of my tinfoil hat into a pipe, so I can put some more weed into it and smoke out of it.

    1. Re:Explanation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm hoping like hell this is an attempt at a joke because if it isn't...

      If the ionosphere can change state from seismic events, why couldn't seismic events be changed through manipulation of the ionosphere?

      If the direction of the sun relative to earth can change the amount of light in my bedroom, why couldn't the direction of the sun relative to earth be changed through the action of my light-switch?

      I could possibly tolerate the idea that HAARP could effect the weather, although the system has so many variables that I doubt any controlled effect could be created, but earthquakes? really?

    2. Re:Explanation: by danny_lehman · · Score: 5, Funny

      maybe the guy pushing the button every 1-1.3 seconds figured out he didn't need to..?

    3. Re:Explanation: by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This signal may well have been a check signal of some kind for various defense services - something like a dead man's grip but now it has been obsoleted. (At least we can hope that it has been)

      As long as there is a carrier there is no real problem. Of course there has had to be other channels too, so this was probably a last resort when/if all other means of communication did break down.

      All related to the M.A.D. doctrine. We can all hope that this is a sign that Russia no longer needs this transmitter because the warheads that were involved are no longer active or are rearranged to a setup where this is no longer necessary or useful.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Explanation: by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it was M.A.D. and it wasn't no longer needed, we would probably already know. So, sleep easy tonight.

    5. Re:Explanation: by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, just like Project ELF for extremely low frequency communication with US submarines, tech moves on.
      Great, useful, in place for years and then superseded.
      Or the lack of a signal and a change to a numbers station means KGB and FSB sleepers are digging out their weapons caches ready for a Red Dawn :)
      Somewhere in the depths of Bolling Air Force Base a DIA nerd is searching scanned East Bloc documents for any hint to signal changes.
      Did the CIA buy the right documents back at the end of the cold war and will the DIA worker find them in time.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Explanation: by inKubus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This reminds me a lot of my monitoring systems for servers. Of course, I use an active check for most stuff, but there are also passive checks that listen for a SNMP trap. Probably that's what this is. There's something important that someone wants to monitor. When it drops out, probably the monitoring device starts recording the message. We have something similar in the U.S. called the Emergency Broadcasting System. Interestingly, the EBS uses a non-automated system (at least it did when I was in radio). So basically you receive a signal from your upstream provider and then you send it out to your downstream people, and then whatever payload there is you send out on the air. It's all manual, the operator in the control room has to know how to do it. This sounds like something similar. The odd thing is the constant carrier. That can get expensive. So it must be something really important, or they use it for other calibrations or orientations.

      Obviously, it could be a spy thing also, it wouldn't be surprising at all. If it's stopped, it's not a big of a problem as if there were a lot of messages ;) Anyway, rest assured the NSA is hard at work and knows much more than you.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    7. Re:Explanation: by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you like some ELF and history I suggest that you go here: SK6SAQ

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    8. Re:Explanation: by w0mprat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I could haarp on about this all day.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    9. Re:Explanation: by lorg · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... not to mention trolls. Those guys are everywhere.

  2. The reason by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a conspiracy! Damn them! This means something, but WHAT COULD IT MEAN?

    "Maintenance"

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:The reason by melikamp · · Score: 3, Funny

      I grew up in Moscow, and I agree. This thing reminds me of the Diablo II chat gem.

  3. Article Quality. by cosm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So the main article comes from a discussion board on a conspira-blog-forum. And the description of the station in question is from Wikipedia, followed by a YouTube video in the third link. Now, don't get me wrong, I am not questioning the journalistic capabilities of the submitters, but holy-jumping-jeebus can we get an article with some legitimate [CITATION NEEDED] please. Perhaps this one was a tongue-in-cheek submission facetiously posted for the TFH crowd.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Article Quality. by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember, just because you're a paranoid psychotic nut job crank doesn't mean there isn't a conspiracy.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Article Quality. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Funny

      >but holy-jumping-jeebus can we get an article with some legitimate [CITATION NEEDED] please.

      In the 1980s the US was eager to test the resolve of the Soviet's glasnost policy of open relations with the West. A drunken Caspar Weinberger, the current Secretary of Defense, decided to ask the Soviets to work closely with experimental music artist Brian Eno after reading an article about him in the Post. Brian was supplied with the best drugs Iran/Contra could supply. After months of negotiations and late night stoner brain-storming sessions, Brian finally got the approval for his epic 10,000 year song which is to be broadcast by the Russians. The break from today was simply the start of the chorus.

      Shortly after the Soviets got revenge by allowing Yakov Smirfnoff passage into the US and then "losing" his paperwork for return.

    3. Re:Article Quality. by Vahokif · · Score: 4, Informative

      You never know, the Russian Woodpecker signal turned out to be a nuclear launch detection radar in Chernobyl.

  4. They're changing the format by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Russian media says the station is switching to soft rock.

    1. Re:They're changing the format by jimmydevice · · Score: 5, Funny

      UVB-76 AM 4625 THE BUZZ! THE BEST BUZZ ALL THE TIME, SINCE 1982!!!

      28 Years is a hell of a long time to be stunting.

    2. Re:They're changing the format by cosm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Russian media says the station is switching to soft rock.

      It would be redundant. The uncreative repetition of top 40's these days is no different than "a buzzing sound that lasts 0.8 seconds, pausing for 1–1.3 seconds, and repeating 21–34 times per minute". Mainstream must all wear tinfoil hats, because they already took a page out of UVB-76's book.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  5. It's back up by jimmydevice · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dialed into 4625 KHz and I can hear the buzz, Guess it was just a maintenance down-period.

    1. Re:It's back up by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its been slashdotted.

  6. Re:Heard about this on 4chan by cosm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Heard about this on 4chan's science board

    Current events research. Your doing it wrong.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  7. Re:Heard about this on 4chan by game+kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your doing it wrong.

    ...

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  8. A week or so after last episode of Lost? by feepness · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think this is pretty obvious.

  9. Re:Boxer Rebellion by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Burma-Shave

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  10. Don't worry... by n3umh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's still a freaky buzz on 4644kHz. And there's something that sounds like a movie ray gun on 4666.
    FOUR SIX SIX SIX
    Plenty of freaky shortwave left...

  11. Re:Heard about this on 4chan by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, no... that's spelled correctly in the native language of 4chan.

  12. Maybe by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe someone just opened the electric bill...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  13. Re: At least WWV is still on the air by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    WWV? Did I miss WWIII and WWIV?

    Guess that's what happens when you spend too much time on Slashdot.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  14. Actually it usually does by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For one thing, you'll notice that the conspiracy nuts are, well, always wrong. They have an abysmal track record throughout history and in modern times. Well, with a trend like that, it is pretty safe to say that they'll continue to be wrong. Same sort of thing with any crackpot thing that has been wrong time and time again. I mean just because ESP has failed every test doesn't prove beyond any and all doubt that it doesn't exist in some form... But it gives really strong evidence of that fact, and thus makes it pretty safe to say that indeed it's BS.

    The other thing is that the people who are in to conspiracies seem to have extremely poor logic skills. They ignore obvious evidence, jump at tenuous connections, straight out make shit up, and place more faith in that which can't be proven than that which can. As such, the conclusions they draw are very likely wrong. When you use a bad logical process, your conclusion usually isn't right. That's just how things go. The scientific method, logical principles, and so on aren't random. It is the stuff that works reliably for separating truth from fiction. So when you fail to use it, well your results are probably incorrect.

    So yes, just because you are a paranoid, psychotic nut job who thinks there's a conspiracy probably DOES mean there isn't a conspiracy. If you bet against them, you'd make plenty of money.

    1. Re:Actually it usually does by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Has nothing to do with profit motive, just simple statistics. Supposing you could find a place that would give you even money on conspiracy theories, well you'd make a ton betting against them. Reason is because they are wrong all the time. It is just a way to illustrate the extremely bad track record.

      One of my favourite recent ones was that the US was cutting communications lines to Iran in preparation for an invasion due to the opening of the Oil Bourse. The media noticed that undersea cables were getting cut and reported on it, without reporting that this happens all the time and there are ships who do nothing but fix cable breaks. The conspiracy theorists on /. came out of the woodwork and said that this was a precursor to attack (the cuts were happening in the Mediterranean) and it was a "sure thing" that the US would invade shortly.

      Well, of course, that didn't happen. The cuts were repaired, life went on, and cables continue to get cut by various sources (careless ships, natural phenomena, etc) all the time and the media pays it no mind.

      It was a completely ridiculous theory, with no good evidence, yet it was a "fact" to the nuts, until it didn't happen. They of course never came out and admitted error or anything.

      So sorry, but you aren't convincing me by making vague references to "disinformation". Simple fact is that conspiracy nuts suck at logic. Their track record is abysmal. Thus, when they make a claim, my default position is to assume it is wrong.

    2. Re:Actually it usually does by takev · · Score: 4, Funny

      I real conspiracy theorist would say that the reason the US didn't invade right then was because they were exposed by slashdot and others and therefore aborted the invasion. In fact all those theories that didn't actually come true was all because of the theorists, so be happy that they exist.

    3. Re:Actually it usually does by BikeHelmet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For one thing, you'll notice that the conspiracy nuts are, well, always wrong. They have an abysmal track record throughout history and in modern times.

      That's because they aren't remembered as conspiracy nuts once they prove their case.

      And the ones that are nutty get a whole lot more attention.

    4. Re:Actually it usually does by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For one thing, you'll notice that the conspiracy nuts are, well, always wrong.

      That's only because when a conspiracy is proven its no longer considered to be in the realm of "conspiracy nuts."

      I'm sure there are hundreds like that, I can think of a few off the top of my head - COINTELPRO, Watergate, Iran-Contra. Tuskegee experiments, Greek Wiretapping Scandal.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Actually it usually does by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget the biggest one, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which was used to escalate our involvement in Vietnam and led to 50k Americans dead, and of course now turned out to be total bullshit.

      As for TFA it is probably just another form of numbers station, which aren't exactly big secrets. Hell I used to listen to them with my grandfather on his big Korean War military radio (I need to find some tubes for that old thing and break it out) and according to him it was pretty common knowledge those were for spy communication. It was one of those things that nobody with high enough clearance would confirm, but he would laugh and say it was one of those "We don't know WHAT that is, wink wink" kind of deals.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Actually it usually does by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep. Hit this one on the head.

      Something I think the so called "conspiracy theorists are nuts" mentality is hurting is America's ability to accept evidence of boring conspiracies, or to not think much of them when they come out. So-and-so embezzled a million bucks with custom software? Meh. Such-and-such company has been stealing from the population for decades? Meh. The NSA/FBI/ATF/IRS/whatever has been with their funding that's illegal? Meh. Oh, but if there was evidence that the government has puppet Presidents, or something like that... people would be interested.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  15. Re:It's no mystery by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

    Chances are, it's a power failure. The area reportedly had a significant storm yesterday. It's possible that the power failed and that they didn't have enough fuel or battery capacity or whatever to keep it running during an extended outage. That would also neatly explain why it reportedly came back and has reportedly died again.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  16. Ionosperic sounder by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is clearly an ionospheric sounder, same as the numbers stations. These things are used during communications planning for a military exercise.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  17. Re:No satellite imagery? by omni123 · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://maps.google.com/maps?t=h&q=56.082778,37.089444(UVB-76)&ie=UTF8&ll=56.081568,37.089972&spn=0.014464,0.045404&z=15

    it's missing on Google Maps right now... that's actually pretty interesting. I'm not really the conspiracy type but definitely interesting.

    Bing has aerial photography that isn't really helpful..
    http://www.bing.com/maps/default.aspx?v=2&cp=56.082778~37.089444&style=h&lvl=15&sp=Point.56.082778_37.089444_UVB-76___

    More sources at http://toolserver.org/~geohack/geohack.php?pagename=UVB-76&params=56_4_58_N_37_5_22_E_type:landmark_region:RU

  18. Well, at least this one is still up. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://www.khaaan.com/

    I've lost track; how many years has Kirk been yodeling into the ether like that?

    -FL

  19. Spooky by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is pretty spooky, I mean the conspiracy theories are kind of warranted considering this station's eerie history.

    Someone must have been funding a station that has lasted since 1982 and is powerful to be heard world wide. I have done a little bit of amateur radio and I know that in order to do that you need some serious power, a huge antenna, and quite a bit of constant maintenance. It is definitely not a stretch to think that this station was/is run by the Russian Government as at the very minimum for some sort of testing or maybe as an emergency broadcasting system during a disaster.

    However, I really doubt its part of the Dead Hand system. I would think they would use something more secure if the dead hand system was under automatic control. If there is any possibility that it is part of the Dead Hand system than the Dead Hand system is certainly a system that requires some sort of human intervention due to possibilities of interference, false positives, or someone over riding the system to send a the activation codes.

    Just my 2 cents, I am certainly no conspiracy theorist but it is always fun to think about the possibilities. There is plenty of stuff that we simply don't know about; however, I do hope that the some of the theories are real because than at least I would know that our government has a high enough level of competence to actually keep fool us in a significant way.

  20. I hate the editors by guyminuslife · · Score: 3, Funny

    Before I read this, I had no idea this thing existed.

    Now, I am consumed with an overwhelming need to discover the reason for this transmission. I will not be able to rest until I have discovered the secret. This transmission is now the most important thing in my life.

    DAMN YOU!

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.