Slashdot Mirror


Why Intel Wants To Network Your Clothes Dryer

An anonymous reader writes "Intel has shown off a working prototype of a small box that, among other things, can monitor your clothes dryer to see how much it's contributing to your power bill. The Intelligent Home Energy Management proof-of-concept device is a small box with an 11.56-inch OLED touchscreen that is designed to act as an electronic dashboard for monitoring energy use in the home. By equipping devices like home entertainment systems and clothes dryers with wireless networked power adapters, the system can actually report back the power draw for a particular power point. Leave the house, and it can make sure power-draining devices like that plasma TV are turned off. It is unlikely the device will enter production (there are apparently only four in existence), however this story about the box shows something we can expect to see in the home of tomorrow. Ultimately, it's not only about saving money, but also reducing load on the electricity grid by removing needless power use."

45 of 330 comments (clear)

  1. Perverts! by MarkGriz · · Score: 3, Funny

    They want to see your underwear, that's why.

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    1. Re:Perverts! by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now i know what "Intel Inside" really meant. Bastards.

  2. only if the government mandates it by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These will only become common if the government mandates it. I do not believe that the average end user will get enough benefit out of a device like this for them to be interested in putting the effort and money out to deploy and use these.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:only if the government mandates it by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of people are already monitoring their stuff with Kill-A-Watt. This is a networked, managed version of that. If the price was low (like less than $30 US per appliance, plus maybe $100 for the central box or software), people would get it. The problem would be getting to that price point.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:only if the government mandates it by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I signed up for PowerSmart Pricing for free. Which has hourly rates instead of a monthly flat rate. I've cut a good chunk of my bill by shifting most electricity to off hours.

      Coupled with a free eSmart programmable thermostat. I can set temperatures from the internet. I also have it setup to kill my AC during peak hours. I did have to give them ability to kill my AC remotely, however 1) I'm not home anyway. 2) It's only 6 times between June and September. Meaning all of 2 days per week.

      I'd love to figure out the protocol that it uses and set up some scripting, but for now it works.

      Initial cost out of pocket: $0
      Savings per month: $20-$50 (compared to previous year)

    3. Re:only if the government mandates it by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've seen some new hotels with some interesting energy saving stuff.. If it doesn't sense anyone in the room, it shuts off the heat/AC, turns off lights, TV, etc.

      Personally, I would love something like that at home, or just a big frickin red button near each door to the house (especially the door to the garage) that would kill all non-essential outlets in the house, turn off lights (except maybe one or two on a timer) and knock the thermostat down (or up in summer)

      Why is Intel working on this at the power supply side. It would seem to be much smarter to do this from the breaker box panel, (and those are actually pretty easy to replace/swap. You have the total house draw right there on the mains, and could monitor the load on each breaker going out. Define the "non-essential" ones, and then turn them off easily. All in one place. Breaker boxes haven't had much technology improvement since they upgraded from little glass fuses...

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    4. Re:only if the government mandates it by xaxa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some electricity companies in the UK have sent digital power meters to customers -- the one my parents received has a large LCD showing the total power use for the home (in watts). The display is portable, the sensor is wrapped around the main power cable.

      (I think they're forced to send them to some people to encourage energy efficiency.)

    5. Re:only if the government mandates it by Polo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But kill-a-watts are becoming more mainstream.

      I've had friends who would never have looked at it until they had trouble with power bills > $500.

      As devices like this appear:

      http://www.belkin.com/conserve/insight/

      that just have a money readout, it will make more sense to non-nerds.

      And hopefully one day: kids.

    6. Re:only if the government mandates it by gumbi+west · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why exactly would I want to spend, even say $200 (a very low price for a system given the cost of a kill-a-watt), for a system that might save me $10 a year on electricity and sometimes annoy me for hours on end.

    7. Re:only if the government mandates it by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, well now you know one: me. To your anecdotal evidence, I add mine. As a relatively new home owner, I visit a lot of DIY forums and I assure you, people everywhere are looking for ways to save on energy costs in this economy.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:only if the government mandates it by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When I see statement like this, I often think about indoor plumbing. I can imagine the hicks saying "how day the government make me put in indoor pluming. My outhouse is good enough."

      Obviously there is little benefit of indoor plumbing, especially in the south where it seldom gets cold and the rain it not that big of impediment, and there is space. The added cost of indoor plumbing does set a huge impediment to ownership of houses, and some may choose to not have it in order to have a protection from the elements.

      So the benefits are societal. We have made a decision that we do not want to defecate in public, so we have spent huge amounts of money to make sure that happens. It is a public health issue. Likewise we are now in process of deciding that we do not want the power plant polluting our air any more than we want the neighbor pissing in the yard. It again is going to cost huge amounts of money to make this happen. Each of us managing our power consumption is going to part of that solution. A dryer is huge waste of electricity, and is going to be one of the big thing that gets managed.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  3. Is this cost effective? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This'll be a great idea if it can be built so cheaply that the money I save from using it is greater than the money I'd save by not buying it.

    Not sure I see that happening all that soon.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  4. Now how about... by Pojut · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they come up with a way to detect that monster that keeps eating my fucking socks. I'm sick and tired of wearing mismatching socks! DAMMIT, FIND THAT BASTARD!!!

    1. Re:Now how about... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dryers actually do eat socks. Some years ago, mine died. Thinking "hey, there might be some salvageable parts" (motor, timer), I took it apart. Inside the case, outside the drum, there was a literal double handful of single socks, and about $4 in change and bills.

    2. Re:Now how about... by russotto · · Score: 3, Informative

      The dryer drum turns. The back and front of the dryer do not. To keep heat and clothing inside the drum while allowing the drum to turn, there are two felt seals between the drum and the case. These wear down and that can result in clothing being pushed through the seals.

  5. Re:Interesting... by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could do that with a sticker right now. Do you need a sticker?

  6. Not sure if its worth it by rotide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Assume for a second that they are going to start selling these systems tomorrow. What would their cost be? $100? $300? $500?

    Now, how much would you stand to save per year in reduced energy use from a device like this monitoring and potentially powering off unused devices? $50? $100?

    I'm already pretty good at keeping things off when I'm not using them so I'm skeptical that a device like this is going to save me any money after you figure in the cost of the device and the ironic cost of powering the device.

    In theory a device like this sounds good but the very people who are worried about their energy use (and would purchase a device like this) are probably the people who least need it.

  7. Clothes dryer? by elvum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My highly advanced clothes-line technology comes with an implicit display of its power consumption - zero.

  8. Useful for some people, but... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see the appeal. It looks like it's over-engineering a solution to something that can be done with common sense.

    Then again, I love tech and gadgets and I guess most of that is an over-engineered solution to something or another.

    The only reason I would care about this is if I realized I left something *dangerous* on before I left for work and could turn it off remotely. I don't use a curling iron, but I know for some that would be a big deal. A stove / oven / toaster oven / etc would be dangerous as well, and while I never left one on before leaving the house I know that's a concern for some. Though I imagine only electric stoves and ovens would apply unless there was a way to electronically turn off the gas reliably.

    As for the power draw, I would just care enough about it to know in the beginning "how much does X" use via one of those little gadgets you can temporarily plug between the device and outlet. Then decide for myself if I should monitor how much I use device X.

    Personally, I'm in the mind-set of "turn if off when not in use."
    - Not watching or listening to the TV, turn it off.
    - Not in that room across the house, turn off the main light.

    I shouldn't need a device to remind me.

    1. Re:Useful for some people, but... by Steauengeglase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I think that idea is inevitable and even responsible, it also seems like a serious vulnerability. I don't want someone getting in and turning my washer, dryer, stove, AC on while I am away, let alone my neighbor's constantly open wrt54g with a default password of "admin".

      If we think planes crashing into buildings are scary how about massive rolling black outs at 8:01 AM every morning.

  9. So the Government can turn it off by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Funny

    So the Government (or the egacorporation acting on the govt's behalf) can turn off your appliance, and only let you use it during certain predetermined times. i.e. Rationing of electricity usage.

    Yeah I know..... you think I'm a nutter for saying that, but then again I've studied government history. If they CAN do a thing, they will do that thing. Maybe not now, maybe not tomorrow, but eventually.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  10. Re:Interesting... by grahamsz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't that a lot of the point of the smart grid?

    I should be able to say, "Dry my clothes in the next 4 hours or when the unit price for power drops below $0.07"

  11. Oh goody, the wired home. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our flying cars are just around the corner.

    I have heard about the intelligent home all my life. So did my parents AND their parents. Look up some old reels from a "visions of the future" style problem. Where you see some housewife in black&white use robots we still don't have. 50+ years and the toaster still doesn't work right.

    Okay, so the dryer is networked. What now? Report its power drain? I know it drains power, I can hear it running. How much? Well, I know how much thank you, I can see it on the bill. If I don't care about the money I sure as hell don't care about the environment OR that it will brownout the district.

    If I do care about the environment and bill, then I would hardly want to ADD to the polution and cost by installing electronic devices I don't need.

    This belongs in the category of the fridge that scans your food. The gadget is called a wife. They can see straight through metal and can detect rotting food a mile away. The gadget for saving electricity is called a dad. Try it. Get a wife with the optional extra of a kiddy or two (odd enough you don't get a discount for bulk buying) and you soon will be the most efficient energy saver on the planet.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  12. Re:Interesting... by Xacid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been waiting for all the foreboding 1984-esque posts here but so far not too many. Frankly I'm glad to see some optimism here for this. People fail to realize how the whole system works. It's not like a battery that gives instant power at a certain capacity. The power companies have to be able to predict usage to a fairly accurate degree. To the best of my knowledge any power produced above what is needed isn't stored anywhere and thus is wasted. If we could optimize the grid in a way that made it more predictable and easier to lower the load on then there'd be less overall waste.

  13. Re:Interesting... by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it could also give suggestions such as:

    "You know, if you waited 4 hours and ran this load of laundy at midnight, you'd save 30% because of the lower power rates"

    That would be pretty cool and useful! We can save a lot of money, not by buying a bunch of new electronic goods but, by simply modifying our habits with our current electric drawing devices.

    Clippy: It looks like you are trying to wash semen stains out of your Y-fronts.Would you like me to order some rubber knickers instead?

  14. Re:Interesting... by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know a way we could save at least 15% of energy usage in the USA right now:

    mandate that all appliances (DVD players, TV's, etc) had an actual, PHYSICAL POWER SWITCH rather than being electrical vampires.

    There's no reason every fucking device on the planet has to have a goddamn clock, and much less that it needs to eat more than 2 watts 24/7 just to wait for a power-on signal from some lazy fatass who can't stand up and walk 8 feet from the couch to turn it on.

  15. Re:wired? Don't bother. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ZigBee, which, as the article states is the key to this system, is a protocol that runs over a wireless mesh network. I use XNet ZB modules for my tinkering.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  16. HAN by Tisha_AH · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work in the AMI/ Smart Grid field and I am just finishing up a study on HAN devices for a municipality. This is the way to go, with a ZigBee enabled device to communicate with power monitoring adapters that all of your electrical loads plug into. If it also supported an internet LAN connection back up to the utility AMI MMS (meter management system) it could incorporate the latest billing rate information and any data collected from the AMI meter outside the house.

    There are some solutions out there that are closed-proprietary but I believe that a standards-based solution is the right way to go. HAN needs to get to the point where you can go into your local home improvement store and buy devices that can associate to a central device. Right now the price-point is too high at around $100 a device and it can cost $300-$400 to equip a home with a IHD (in home dislay), programmable thermostat and a communications gateway.

    I hope that Intel can apply pressure to the marketplace so this technology can become ubiquitous.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  17. Re:Interesting... by xaxa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pumped storage schemes can store power (pump water uphill, to fill the reservoir used by a hydroelectric power plant).

    Wikipedia says it's used for 2.5% and 5% of electricity generation in the US and EU respectively.

  18. Re:Interesting... by amorsen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    much less that it needs to eat more than 2 watts 24/7 just to wait for a power-on signal from some lazy fatass who can't stand up and walk 8 feet from the couch to turn it on.

    That can be achieved with less than 0.1W. It's close enough to 0 for me. Mandate that instead of mandating physical switches.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  19. CurrentCost meters by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here in the UK we're seeing a lot of devices that you place around the incoming electricity feed (via a loop you put around the cable) that has a wireless transmitter to a LCD display of current overall power usage (and some historical stats). They're quite cool, some can be connected to your PC, like the CurrentCost Envi. The idea is you can see how much power those hungry devices use as you see the meter spike up when you turn them on.

    The government has set a policy for monitoring meters, and the electricity companies (and Sky TV for some reason) are offering subsidised units (I got mine cheap off ebay from someone who had one of these).

    You can get these things in the US and Australia/NZ too, and even Google is getting involved as these things will upload to Google Powermeter.

    So, adding a wireless usage transmitter to every plug sounds expensive (but cool) but it wouldn't provide that much more information than you can get currently. However, the CurrentCost devices talk to each other (and you can set up multiple meters) so if their comms protocol was a standard (it might be, they advertise it as C2), then additional transmitters could fit into an existing power-usage network without fuss.

    1. Re:CurrentCost meters by swillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And this is the stinker: It tells me that the cooker (hob and oven) and the TV use the most power in the house. duh.

      Okay, so your largest draws are things you can't (or don't want to) reduce. Does that mean you should just give up? Why not spend some time looking at other areas to see if you can reduce your usage by a few percent?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  20. Re:More likely.... by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Funny

    and Google collect its MAC.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  21. Re:Interesting... by skids · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "vampire power" thing is a bit overrated, actually. It's worth having standards for new appliances limiting their offline current draw, but the amount of energy savings to be had doesn't come anywhere near 15% of our electricity use. Not even close. Home electronics themselves only use 7ish percent of our total electricity. See here

    To the GP: yes that's the idea of the smart grid.

    And in general it is pretty pathetic that Zigbee or X25 or even out-of-band ethernet or RS232 power strips and power meters continue to be products that are only sold at a premium to professional IT/ISP departments or home automation boutiques. The meters and the power switches themselves are all dirt cheap, and the network interfaces are also really cheap to add. I mean, look at the price of 5-port ethernet switches and tr to tell yourself adding a port or radio to a deivice like this is going to be "prohibitively expensive". It just does not make sense.

    But these have always been products that cannot sell on the shelf at Home Depot. The best you can get is a dedicated lightswitch/lamp pair that uses a proprietary "protocol." As sad as that is, it's "progress" compared to several years ago when even that was not available.

    Anyway, I suppose I'm going to have to watch a slow motion trainwreck of companies trying to proprietizesmart grid initiatives in the coming decades. Sigh.

  22. Re:Double-edged sword by MontyApollo · · Score: 2

    This idea of appliances calling in for their own repairs has been somebody's wet dream for a long time, and they even made a TV commercial showing supposedly how it would be a good thing for a repairman showing up at the door unannounced. That's not what I want, and I don't see why this idea has such legs.

    It would be maybe interesting if the appliance could send just me a report, then I could shop it around for estimates, but having it automatically contact somebody without going through me first is unappealing.

  23. Re:Interesting... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clippy: It looks like you are trying to wash semen stains out of your Y-fronts.Would you like me to order some rubber knickers instead?

    Clippy: It looks like you are trying to wash blood stains and powder residue off your clothes. Would you like me to contact a criminal defense attorney?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  24. Re:Interesting... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have a physical power switch AND let every device have a clock......that gets set by radio time sources and stores time zone in non-volatile memory.

    Have your cake, and eat it too.

    Or each device could utilize a normally-open relay for power switching.

    Your DVR can record a show, then open the relay when finished.
    Press one button to turn your microwave on, then enter the cooking time. When it's finished, the relay opens.

    Sure, it will add to the cost of the device. But if the 15% is accurate for your household, the additional device cost will be made up in no time at all.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
  25. Not monster. Wormhole. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    I seem to get extra socks out of my dryer. They must be yours. Gimme your address and I'll send them to you.

    1. Re:Not monster. Wormhole. by frogjimmy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Busted! Typical "Nigerian sock scam" if I've ever heard of it. Don't fall for it! There are no crate-loads of argyles waiting for you! He's not really a prince!

    2. Re:Not monster. Wormhole. by MagicM · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just put them back in the dryer. They'll make their way back.

  26. MIT's done this for years by Captain+Spam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, basically they're working on an advanced (or, if you feel you must call it this way, "overcomplicated") version of MIT's Random Hall Laundry Server? Are we going to see an advanced version of the Bathroom Server next?

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  27. Re:Interesting... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't want ANY of this stuff near my electronics.

    Sure, it sounds good to be able to monitor...however, I'm afraid that it might become mandated that everyone would have to have a monitoring device, and the govt gets to tell you when you can do what, and what temp your house can be, etc.

    With the feds (and some states) poking their noses into private citizens' lives more and more...I see this as one more thing coming. Hell, sounds like one hell of a rider to attach to the cap and trade bills going through right now.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  28. Re:Interesting... by The+Chemical+Crow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about a power strip with a switch?

  29. Re:Interesting... by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    mandate that all appliances (DVD players, TV's, etc) had an actual, PHYSICAL POWER SWITCH rather than being electrical vampires [sciencedaily.com].

    There's no reason every fucking device on the planet has to have a goddamn clock, and much less that it needs to eat more than 2 watts 24/7 just to wait for a power-on signal from some lazy fatass who can't stand up and walk 8 feet from the couch to turn it on.

    Horse shit horse shit horse shit horse shit.

    Buy a Kill-A-Watt
    Measure the actual power consumption of your devices in standby mode
    Find that they're all immeasurably close to 0

    I have a wide variety of chargers, adapters, power strips, surge protectors, AV gear, gaming systems, etc. None of them draw so much as a single watt of power when in standby mode.

    The claims that I need to buy a smart power strip to shut off my array of chargers, or that governments need to mandate that devices come with GREEN FEATURE #246187 is utter horse shit.

    You claim at least 15%.
    Show me the fucking numbers, measured from appliances in your house. I've measured my shit, and I know these claims are lies.

    You want to ACTUALLY conserve energy use?
    Fix your insulation. The vast majority of homes in the US and the world have shitty, shitty insulation.

    Beyond that, yes, I want every device to have a physical power switch. Why? Because I like having physical control over my shit.

  30. The vampires are real by name_already_taken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The "vampire power" thing is a bit overrated, actually.

    No, it isn't.

    Switching power supplies, like good quality cell phone chargers and laptop power supplies generally use almost no power when they're not under load. At least, the ones in my house don't. I know this because...

    I installed a Brultech ECM-1240 on my house's breaker panel. It has current taps around the main feed, and several other house circuits, like the kitchen outlets, furnace (which also works as my a/c blower in the summer), etc. It sends the data over IP to a low power PC (6W, thanks to a low power CPU and SSD) which stores it in a database and generates graphs you can view in a web browser (unfortunately using a Flash applet).

    The software was, to put it mildly, complicated to set up. Seriously. It's not quite a finished product, and it has a few gotchas that prevent it from working until you figure out the mindset of the person who hacked it together. Once it's working, it's pretty neat though.

    So, what did I find?

    The powered subwoofer in the living room uses 10W when it's in "Standby" mode. It's now wired to a relay connected to my receiver's switched outlet, so it's never on unless the receiver is also on.

    The PS3 wakes itself up at all times of the night - oh, you think it's off, but it's nowhere near off. It'll wake up for whatever nefarious reason whenever the hell it wants to and then it stays on until you turn it off again - all the time using about 150W continuously. I wanted to watch Bluray movies, not heat the room all night, thanks. I turn off it's power switch (on the rear of the unit) after I shut it down now.

    The Apple TV uses 30W all the time - ok, this is Apple's fault, I think. There's no power switch, and I don't think there's even an option to shut it down. I just unplug it, which is inconvenient since we use the Airtunes function a lot.

    I've even found some things that aren't really vampire power, but are what I call bugs and inefficiencies:

    The color laser printer upstairs decided one day that sleep mode means "run all your motors and keep the fuser warm for no apparent reason." Averaging about 350W continuously (we don't use the upstairs of the house much, so it went unnoticed until I came home and saw the power usage chart. Reset the printer and all is well so far.

    The basement dehumidifier was going through defrost cycles very frequently. You could see them as a sawtooth on top of the main power use graph. I took the machine apart, washed the coils and replaced some insulation that had fallen off one of the refrigerant lines. Power use dropped by about 50W and the defrost cycles happen much further apart.

    Anyhow, I guess my main point is that your house is probably full of power wasting appliances, but unless you know what's going on, you'll never find them. Except the laser printer - I heard that one when I went into the room it's in.

    You don't need anything as complicated as my setup, just something that will record the power usage (or even just current) coming in on your main power feed. It's really helpful though to know when things are going wrong.

    Looking at the graph, I can see big things like the house a/c, the garage door opener, etc., but also small things - in the winter I could see the 8W used by the furnace's gas valve as it cycled the burners on and off, and I can see the 3W from the solenoid valve in the fridge when someone gets a glass of water from the dispenser on the fridge door.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!