Slashdot Mirror


At Google, You're Old and Gray At 40

theodp writes "Google faces an imminent California Supreme Court decision on whether an age discrimination suit against it can go forward. But that hasn't kept the company from patting itself on the back for how it supports 'Greyglers' — that's any Googler over 40. At a company of about 20,000 full-time employees, there were at last count fewer than 200 formally enrolled Greyglers working to 'make Google culture ... welcome to people of all ages.'"

25 of 543 comments (clear)

  1. Not just Google by walterbyrd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the belief that IT workers are washed-up at 40 is fairly widespread. Some believe that the H1B flooding is actually designed to get rid of older IT workers.

    1. Re:Not just Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most people under 40 don't want to spend 40hours+/week at work

    2. Re:Not just Google by AnonymousClown · · Score: 4, Insightful
      >Or do the old-timers just not get new technology?

      There's the old people who use age as an excuse for not bothering to learn. They just don't want to.

      Then there are the grandmas who are tech savvy. They get the internet, webcams, texting, and the shabang - then they tell their kids and grandkids, "I got internet, webcam, texting and all this connectivity. What's your excuse NOW for not calling?!?"

      Besides, most people over 40 don't want to spend 60hours+/week at work.

      That's because we got burnt too many times with the line of: "Work your ass off and there will be rewards." only to get a pink slip or just a cost of living raise with the rational that "you missed some of your metrics" or "you missed a deadline" - regardless of how unreasonable it was and the fact that the deadline was made by the marketing department to make a trade show or because the salesmen bullshitted to make the sale.

      We also learned that if you have to work 60+ hours a week regularly, it is the result of incompetent management.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:Not just Google by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is it? Or do the old-timers just not get new technology?

      The kids think some rehashed ancient concept from the 70s or 80s with a new marketing campaign, or same old stuff tweaked by the engineers now with improved specs, is "new technology".

      I know about IBM VM OS from the 80s, so I know everything about Xen/KVM/etc except the new marketing spin and the command line syntax.

      I know pascal p-code virtual machine system from the 70s, so I know everything about the java virtual machine concept except the new marketing spin and the command line syntax.

      The kids are trying to wrap their heads around the very concept of virtual machines, or the very concept of clustering, or the very basic concept of parallelization/threading. I did that back in the 80s, its old technology to me, not new.

      Same &#!^ different day with "high level language of the week (tm)", client-server processing, middleware, packetized data networks, etc.

      Is there any "new technology" out there to get, that I didn't get decades ago with a different marketing campaign and different command line syntax?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Not just Google by tychovi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most people over 40 realize that in the end it's just a job. Families are important and when you reach a certain age you start to understand what's important in life. Most corporations will drop you short of fully vetted and with not so much as a "thank you very much" to save the money.

      20 somethings are great because they'll work long hours and think nothing of it. The problem is quantity does not equate to quality. Google might not be in so many new court cases if they had a little wisdom present when some 20 something said "Hey, lets put WiFi sniffers on our camera cars!".

    5. Re:Not just Google by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful


      You would be dead by 30.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    6. Re:Not just Google by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think many of us "old" techies have no problems getting how cell phones or Twitter works.
      What we have a problem getting is why. TXTing is as important to the evolution of communication as the pogo stick is for the evolution of transportation.

    7. Re:Not just Google by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that's just to keep wages down in general.

      Age discrimination is about one thing: companies would rather have a 20-something desperate for work working 60 hours a week at $40K/year than they would a 50-something with some financial security working 40 hours a week at $70K/year. There are also some factors involving health insurance that can make it cheaper to have younger workers as well, but that's the basic story.

      It has nothing to do with whether older workers are productive, "get" newer technology, or fit into the company culture. From the point of view of your employer, you are an expense, and their goal is to minimize expenses by hiring the cheapest workers they can capable of doing the job (or at least not failing too badly).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    8. Re:Not just Google by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or do the old-timers just not get new technology?

      Funny, my young friends come to me for help with their tech. Maybe I'm not your normal geezer, but most other nerd geezers aren't so normal either.

      Besides, most people over 40 don't want to spend 60hours+/week at work.

      Damned right, suckers. With a few years (hopefully) one gains a bit of wisdom. I don't live to work, I work to live, and sixty hours a week doesn't leave much time for living.

      I think it's a damned shame that you young people are willfully giving up what my and previous generations have fought and striven for.

      Again -- SUCKERS!

      Now GOML.

    9. Re:Not just Google by Bucc5062 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Holy crap, are you serious? First of, who really wants to work a 60 hr week? For that matter why forty or even a flippin' 8 hr day. programming is not assembly work, it is craftsman work, more art then anything else. Since I started in this industry over 29 years ago I found that the idea of turning on creativity at 9 and turning it off at 5 was laughable. For accounting purposes I appreciate the need for some set time frame of measurement for payment of services, but if it takes you 60 hours to accomplish tasks in a week then either you cannot do your job well, you are way over worked thus abused in your job, or a workaholic that cannot comment on how normal people approach their job. I do not want to spend 60+ hours a week working because at 49, I have a life.

      As to understanding new technology? How frickin' pretentious can you get? Define "new" technology? Show me a language that is radically different from most other languages that only "young" technicians understand. Are machines that more sophisticated today then five, ten, fifteen years ago or have they just improved in speed, storage space, and simplicity. I don't use an Iphone so am I just an old geezer or a person who does not want to toss his well earned salary on Apple/AT&T for a bunch of toy apps. Ipad, slates, notebooks, these are not "new" technology, just repackaged current technology. New would be along the lines of neural links, bio-integrated technology that free me completely from carrying around some plastic, silicon and wire.

      Grow up, think for a moment. One day you will be me, a 49 year old, active, knowledgeable IT professional with the potential to work, add value to a company while enjoying a life. Step away from the narcissistic attitude and consider your future when you say things like "do the old-timers" and then don't say it unless your purpose is to sound stupid in public.

      Sit on my lawn all you want because (1) I bought it with my salary (2) I can enjoy it because I work to enjoy it and (3) because it seems you need a place to remind you that life is more then work.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    10. Re:Not just Google by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >I'm 40. I think that MY generation at 40 might be starting to get washed up
      Not convinced. I'm 46 and when I grew up I knew a lot of people who really got into home computers. Heck, I started with programmable TI calculators in the 1970s. My friends now span around 44-55 years old and 70% of them are still really into IT and can build PCs, program in various languages etc. Some do it as a hobby, some professionally. There *are* people in my age group and much lower who play the 'well, we didn't have computers when I grew up so I can't learn them' card. This is just pure bollocks. They might not be interested in the things but don't blame your age for it. I'm not interested in cars but I'm not going to say 'Well, we didn't have fuel injection when I was young so I just can't understand them'.
      FWIW, since I hit 40 I've learned Java, XHTML/CSS/PHP/mySQL and built my own CMS. Just before that I learned C# when it first came out. At home for fun I've played about with XNA and I'm now looking at Android development. Workwise I'm still cranking out C/Unix or VB/Windows stuff. At my last count I've worked on 8 OS's and 30+ languages and to be honest, new ones get easier because they have so much in common after a while.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    11. Re:Not just Google by drewhk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To summarize:

      Old people are no more lazy than young ones, but much less naive.

    12. Re:Not just Google by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're not getting it. Pretty much everything 'new' in IT is just the old stuff renamed/repackaged. The point the OP was making is that once you grok the concepts, learning the latest syntax is trivial. I found Java pretty easy to pick up because it had so much of previous languages in it. I already knew how much of the underlying technology worked so all I had to do was work out what J2EE and other terms were all about. A day with Google, a half decent book or two on Java and 2 weeks later I was running circles around the hot new Java 'Guru' grads at work. The only difference was that I went home at 5:30 and they stayed somewhat later working on something that would have taken anyone with experience ten minutes to solve.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    13. Re:Not just Google by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny thing about that. We are doing an SAP conversion and one of the principles on the project is in his 60's and outworking the consultants who are working obscene hours because they are paid hourly. Many of the other developers in their 50's are putting in 60+ hour weeks (and have been for several months).

      But generally, it's not a question of "too tired" as much as "too smart".

      Pay me hourly and I'll work the hours you want.

      Why should I work 60+ hours a week for a 10% bonus?

      Why is your emergency an emergency? Sure an emergency can go on for a few weeks but if you are talking 18 months-- you are understaffed. It's not an emergency. You are using me as a slave and a battery to toss away when I get to be "old" at 40.

      Especially when I know the managers are going to be getting 33% bonuses if the project goes in?

      Also, the younger people get 30 years of career payoff for (in some cases literally) killing themselves. On our last big push 10 years ago we had a fairly young developer die when an other wise mild virus wasn't taken as sick time and he worked and worked and finally it crossed the blood brain barrier. The doctors apparently said he was so worn down he couldn't fight the illness.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:Not just Google by xaxa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Patience and frequency come down to the user -- that's not a problem with the technology. I disagree with you about patience, anyway: if you make a phone call you're implicitly wanting an immediate response; not the case for a text message.

      Your grandparents (or great grandparents, perhaps) would think the same about you telephoning friends when you were a teenager, and could make the same arguments. Their social engagements had to be arranged in person, or by letter!

    15. Re:Not just Google by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you haven't saved enough for most of your retirement by the time you hit your 40s, you kind of deserve to have to worry about it.

      WTF are you talking about? Do you have any idea how things work in the real world?

      I'm still in my 20s

      Ah. Carry on, then.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  2. young company by spidr_mnky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it possible that this statistic is just due to the fact that Google is a young company? My hypothesis here is that they've just done the most hiring where there are the most candidates, straight out of school. I don't know whether this is sufficient to explain the numbers, but it's not like they can focus on retaining employees that have been with the company for twenty years. Anyone old at Google was hired old.

    1. Re:young company by careysub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A company staffed by newly graduated graduate students explains a lot about their interview practices. A Google interview session is typically an oral exam - solve hard problems on your feet as if you had recently taken a course in the material - because it is the only form of evaluation they know.

      They can use any style of interview they want (interviewing is sadly a very flawed evaluation process anyway), but only recent graduates, or people who specially refresh their oral exam skills in advance, will do well in these types of interviews. And often the expectation of the interviewer is pretty unreasonable: if he is a fresh expert in X, then you should be a fresh expert in X, otherwise you get the fatal interview veto and become a no-hire; given that there are are an awful lot of X's in the computer world, this is going to eliminate a lot of excellent engineers. This stuff has little to do with on-the-job problem solving and programming skills.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  3. Elders of the internet by NoZart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is always the talk of how older people don't get new technology, but i think this only described the people who grew up without IT and were confronted with it at a late age for the first time.

    This might be naive, but i think now is the time where people grew up in this high tech scenario and for the first time actually grew old with it, too. Society needs to understand that the "new old guys" are just as proficient in adapting new technology as the young ones because adapting is what they did their whole life.

  4. Work / Life Balance by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm 43 and work in IT in Vancouver, Canada. Vancouver's version of Google is Electronic Arts (EA). EA has many employees in Vancouver, a 'cool' office and lots of perks, like Google. It also has a very young workforce with people like me generally not interested in working there. Why? Because there's very little life/work balance at EA. I'm married, I have a kid and another one on the way - I'm not interested in working 80 hour weeks in exchange for free breakfast and a basketball court. I'd rather go home on a summer evening and play frisbee with my kid - Not play ultimate with my co-workers, then go back to work for another 3 hours. Google builds cool stuff, but I suspect their culture just isn't skewed to provide those things that someone like me would want, i.e. a good life outside of the office. Doesn't mean they're a bad company, they're just not a good fit for people like me.

  5. Speaking as an old geezer by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The bad news is, I probably don't pick up new crap as quickly as I used to. The good news is, I don't need to because most of it is like the old crap I've already learned.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  6. Re:Age Discrimination is Reality in IT by mario_grgic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not if you are James Gosling, Guy Steele, Peter Norvig, Ken Tompson, Bjarne Stoustroup, Joshua Block, Donald Knuth etc.

    If you get too comfortable in your position and stagnate, fail to thrive and achieve and make a name for yourself in the industry, then yes, you will be pushed out by cheaper labor that will eat your lunch. I doubt any of the above guys tremble in front of 20 year old kids that come to work with them. It's most definitely the other way around.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  7. ageism, as opposed to sexism or racism by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    has a built in karma

    if you are white, you'll never be black. if you're a man, you'll never be a woman

    but if you are 20, some day you WILL be 50. therefore, all of the hatred you dish out will be visited back on you... by your own self. karma still applies to sexism and racism, but it comes back in the form of other people's views of you. not the special hell of a self-created low self-opinion

    if you are 20, and have a bad attitude towards the aged, someday, you will have a bad attitude towards yourself. self-hatred is something all of us carry around to some extent, but to have self-hatred gradually grow as you get older must be a terrible weight to bear, and it keeps growing

    you can see it on the street: the guys with the ridiculous fake hair and the women with the ridiculous facial plastic surgery: this is self-hatred. who wants to walk around broadcasting their lack of confidence and stinking of desperation, to telegraph that you want to be something you can never be again? to worship youth, but then turn into someone old, must be a terrible experience to go through. to simply look at yourself in the mirror and be filled with anguish: built in karma for being an ageist. this also might explain some suicides by people in their 40s and 50s

    meanwhile, if you always treated the elderly fairly and gracefully, then when you yourself are older you will still be confident, and still like yourself, because you will treat your older self the way you treat older others today. built in karma still applies, but in the positive: you age gracefully, and have a full happy life

    so the cost of being an ageist is to have an unhappy older life

    don't be an ageist. look at the elderly and see yourself as you will be someday, and smile, for the sake of your own future happiness. you want to age gracefully, you really do. so prepare yourself psychologically now for aging gracefully, by treating the aged you encounter today with the same grace you want to treat yourself with later

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  8. misleading? by quadelirus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article seems misleading. It says that Google has 20,000 employees and fewer than 200 of them over the age of 40 are working to "make Google culture... welcome to people of all ages."

    It makes it sound as if they are saying Google is a company of 20,000 with fewer than 200 employees of age 40 or over, but that isn't true. It's just that fewer than 200 of them have joined this specific group to make Google culture welcome to people of all ages. Seems like we've made a "news story" out of thin air. Slow news day?

  9. Young people dont last here very long. by xmousex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I blame it on the current talent pool in the midwest. Most of the people we bring in now all have this "video game" degree from the nearby university. Not one of them understands the concept of designing practical solutions. They also do not understand testing. They seem to fall into the duct tape programmer category. Simple obvious decisions about user interface, input formatting, smart security decisions, anticipating user mistakes, these things just dont come with that degree they arrive with. The seasoned programmers here watch the same stupid mistakes getting made over and over again. On the one hand, we desperately need the help, there is so much work to get done and tons of money to be made, on the other hand, these kids that come in just make more work for us in the long run as we keep recoding and recoding the stupid shit that they do. In a few instances, these kids get a degree and find out its not really what they wanted to do with their life. They just got the degree because they liked playing with their wii and their parents were excited to have something their kids would actually pay attention through in school.

    I would much rather bring in the mature, more experienced programmer that has been through it all and builds in ways that eliminates all the obvious problems, so we can stay focused on the bigger issues of a project.