Slashdot Mirror


5.5 Earthquake Hits Canada; Felt in US Midwest, New England

joelmax writes "A magnitude 5.5 earthquake hit central Canada this afternoon, rattling buildings from Windsor to Montreal to several US states. The epicentre of the quake was in Quebec, 61 kilometres north of Ottawa, according to the US Geological Survey, and struck at 1:41 pm EDT." If you felt this quake, it would be great to put your location in the title of your comments, below — with lat/long coordinates even better.

66 of 560 comments (clear)

  1. Shaking in Ottawa by geo-geo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was in a boardroom on the 6th (top) floor of our building for a 1:30 pm meeting and just as we're getting underway the table and chairs were shaking. Was pretty heavy for about 20 seconds and then faded off over the next minute. We're a lot of government buildings so the policy is to evacuate. We actually tried to continue our meeting but then they finally got to our floor to check it out they found us and told us to leave. As you can guess, no more work is really being done today. It's pretty exciting for us as we don't get this here.
    One interesting note, when I did go outside most everyone was on their cell phone and several were stating that they couldn't get service. I would guess because of the increase in volume at that time.

    1. Re:Shaking in Ottawa by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I didn't get touched, I'm in Alberta, but our Branches out in the Toronto Area felt it quite a bit.

      Latitude = 43.6325, Longitude = -79.6601
      Lat = 43 degrees, 38.0 minutes North
      Long = 79 degrees, 39.6 minutes West

      Our only Tech out there emailed and asked if our systems were capable of withstanding 5.5 Earthquakes.

        We emailed back "We don't know!!! Is everything running? Power okay? Any one sent in any IT Requests?"

      To which he responded, "Everything looks good. We're all fine by the way, thanks for checking."

    2. Re:Shaking in Ottawa by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

      We actually tried to continue our meeting but then they finally got to our floor to check it out they found us and told us to leave. As you can guess, no more work is really being done today.

      You know, as a resident of Southern California, I don't get many opportunities to call anybody else a weenie*...

      * :)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Shaking in Ottawa by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously. 5.5? I don't get out of bed for anything less than a 6.5.

      I guess we're just jaded here in SoCal.

    4. Re:Shaking in Ottawa by noidentity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're in an area that isn't hit often, it's smart to take it seriously, even though people in other areas treat the same magnitude earthquake something less-serious. People in the latter place are used to handling the after-effects, and the infrastructure is made to handle it better. In other words, the context matters as well as the event.

    5. Re:Shaking in Ottawa by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      The surface waves may spread farther in area, but magnitude N is still magnitude N. It's like getting two feet of snow in D.C. -- it's unusual, but other people are still going to laugh at you when you freak out.

    6. Re:Shaking in Ottawa by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seismic waves don't travel along the surface. Ok, so the short-range ones do.

      Just like echos in water, they bounce around and form "pockets" or whatever they are called where the effect is intensified by constructive interference.

      It's entirely possible to have a stretch between you and the epicenter who feels nothing, yet you get your teeth rattled.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Shaking in Ottawa by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>You know, as a resident of Southern California, I don't get many opportunities to call anybody else a weenie*...

      Seriously.

      Since when is a mere 5.5 earthquake front page news on Slashdot? I guess people in other parts of the country don't really understand that a 5.5 is quite weak.

    8. Re:Shaking in Ottawa by FiloEleven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's news because it's an unusual geological event, and there are lots of geeks who find this sort of thing interesting. Since it was so widespread, I'm sure they got a lot of submissions from people who were affected by it.

  2. central canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get a map... its the east side of Canada.

    Yes, Toronto is ego central though...

    1. Re:Central Canada? by JazMuadDib · · Score: 5, Informative

      Central Canada is a term used in Canada to represent Ontario and Quebec, as opposed to Western or Atlantic Canada. It has little to do with geography.

    2. Re:Central Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be from Calgary.

      Eastern Canada is New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, PEI and NFLD/Labrador.
      Western Canada is west of Ontario.

    3. Re:Central Canada? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ontario and Quebec is actually called Eastern Canada. Those 3 provinces west of Ontario are central. While British Columbia is West.

      Central Canada.

  3. Central Canada? by mdielmann · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's not exactly Central Canada. You can't go much farther east without being in the Atlantic. Granted, it probably impacted more Canadians than an earthquake anywhere else in the country would have.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  4. Nothing in Chicago by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Informative

    But I figured a USGS link was in order.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  5. Obligatory xkcd by Jamori · · Score: 5, Funny
  6. I felt it....ohhh wait. by PieterBr · · Score: 5, Funny

    At first I thought it was because the US won their group on the world championship. But then I realised the are no football fans in America.

    1. Re:I felt it....ohhh wait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Soccer. There are no soccer teams in America. There are lots of football teams.

      By the way, if we win the World Cup, that means the sport gets renamed worldwide. Seriously, we'll do it. How does "FISA World Cup" sound?

    2. Re:I felt it....ohhh wait. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are no soccer teams in America. There are lots of football teams

      Football is not handegg.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:I felt it....ohhh wait. by Changa_MC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Football. There are no football teams in America. There are lots of American Rugby teams

      FTFY

      --
      Changa hates change.
    4. Re:I felt it....ohhh wait. by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, from that picture I suddenly understood American attitudes towards soccer. The guy with his taped up fingers (and exaggeratedly padded muscles) running like he could pound through a refrigerator looks way more manly than the guy with what looks like a hacky sack and herbalife written on his chest. It also explains soccer's heightened popularity in certain parts of California. Soccer needs to get new sponsors, that's all I can say.

      --
      Qxe4
    5. Re:I felt it....ohhh wait. by ak3ldama · · Score: 5, Funny

      When a 6'2" tackle who benches 620 and weighs 310lbs of solid muscle tells you he plays football, you don't question it.

      Sure you can, you then let him chase you around for, say, 25 seconds and then he tires. Either that or he continues chasing you all the while wondering why no one blew a whistle yet...

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
  7. Ann Arbor by CoffeePlease · · Score: 5, Informative

    42.31124, -83.67578 Thought it was a particularly large person stomping around near my cube. The floor shimmied slightly. It was cool.

  8. felt in toronto by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    I felt it in my basement apartment in Toronto.

    But was it really an earthquake, or did the thought of all those politicians gathering for the G20 make the ground vomit?

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
    1. Re:felt in toronto by Dorkmaster+Flek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I felt it at my work in the downtown core as well. It was a small rumble here, though. I doubt it caused any real damage, although given the fact that the G20 is in town, an earthquake was not my first instinct when I felt it...

      --
      I like to think of online DRM as something akin to a college -- you pay for lessons until you learn something.
  9. Twitter not good enough for you? by Tsaot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or, to save time, you could just try querying the Twitter API for any tweets with the #earthquake tag, check the location of said tweets, and plug those into Google maps. Or, for an even faster (but more constrained) result, you could just check the USGS Did You Feel It? map. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/dyfi/events/us/2010xwa7/us/index.html

    1. Re:Twitter not good enough for you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In answer to your subject:

      No. With all confidence and utmost sincerity, I believe I speak for the majority of Slashdot users when I say, in fact, no, Twitter is not good enough for us. Thank you for your time.

  10. Nothing too serious. by BLToday · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm from California, a 5.5 is about a large truck going by. One time, we had a 5.4 in the Bay Area and it was one of those quick jolt ones. I thought the fat guy in the apartment above me fell down. I think we had a 5-something last week, I didn't notice since I was at Disneyland.

    1. Re:Nothing too serious. by RafaelAngel · · Score: 2, Funny

      As said fatguy, all I gotta say is that I tripped over the dog.

  11. Shaking by rxan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mississauga near Pearson Airport. 4th floor of office building. Wavy and shaking. Nothing was broken but you could really feel it. 43.638968,-79.609534

  12. 5.5? Feh! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the 5th floor of the Key Bank building. EVERYBODY PANIC!!!

    What a bunch of wimps.

    Here in southern California, a mere 5.5 would hardly even arouse anyone's interest. Probably make page 1 of the local section unless the Padres made a big trade; then it would be relegated to page 2.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:5.5? Feh! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, but it did happen on a major fault line that's been there some hundreds of millions of years.

    2. Re:5.5? Feh! by JO_DIE_THE_STAR_F*** · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yeah, and if the temperature in southern California dropped to -40C and dumped 2 feet of snow, California would be shut down for a week and the national guard would be called in.

      Where as in Edmonton, Alberta that's a regular Tuesday (in January).

      It's all a matter of perspective.

      If your on a ocean going vessel and your hit by a 30m rouge wave that's a minor incident.

      If on the other hand your riding your bike through the park and get hit by a 30m rouge wave You may drown and the event is going to make headlines the world over.

    3. Re:5.5? Feh! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you see any tectonic plates meeting in the middle of North America?

      Nope, but that has nothing to do with you easterners being a bunch of wimps when it comes to earthquakes. You were even too wimpy to post with your nick--QED. For that matter, it doesn't even have all that much to do with earthquakes. The most powerful earthquake in US history happened on the New Madrid fault, which is a thousand miles or more from the nearest tectonic plate boundary.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    4. Re:5.5? Feh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rouge waves? Well if you're in the gulf maybe, though more of a brown/black wave...

    5. Re:5.5? Feh! by nizo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd be worried about quakes too if I lived someplace that wasn't accustomed to having them and had many old non-earthquake safe buildings.

      So how's your tornado shelter?

    6. Re:5.5? Feh! by Mordaximus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What a bunch of wimps. Here in southern California, a mere 5.5 would hardly even arouse anyone's interest. Probably make page 1 of the local section unless the Padres made a big trade; then it would be relegated to page 2.

      Wimps?

      2" of snow would make you cry for weeks. In Ottawa, we finally caved in and cheered for an extra 6" so we could break the 170" record only a few years ago. It's all about what you're accustomed to.

    7. Re:5.5? Feh! by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's all of that illegal make-up dumping. It leads to rouge waves, mascara storms and glitter tornadoes.

    8. Re:5.5? Feh! by bigredradio · · Score: 4, Informative

      Snow day? Ha, here in SoCal just a rainy day is a major upset in our routines. Odd how you get used to some things.

      Earthquakes = No problem.
      Drizzle = OMG WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO!!!

    9. Re:5.5? Feh! by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Snow day? Ha, here in SoCal just a rainy day is a major upset in our routines. Odd how you get used to some things.

      Earthquakes = No problem. Drizzle = OMG WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO!!!

      LOL, yeah, that's true! Major mayhem on the highway whenever it rains down here but that's not due to panic, it's due to it being way too easy to get a drivers license in this state.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    10. Re:5.5? Feh! by lupinstel · · Score: 5, Funny

      The key to driving in the rain in SoCal is to drive as fast possible through it; therefore you spend less time on the road and minimize your exposure to the dangers of rain.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    11. Re:5.5? Feh! by hypnotik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah. In Chile we laugh at you California people making big deal of 7.0 magnitude earthquakes. Here those are called aftershocks.

      For the record -- I was 60 miles from the epicenter of the 8.8 on February 27th. The quake wasn't that bad, but the aftershocks every 15 minutes for the next 3 days got tiring.

      --
      (I was only an egg, but then I cracked)
    12. Re:5.5? Feh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      many old non-earthquake safe buildings

      Bingo. Houses are built for snow-load back home. (I'm out West now.) There's a lot of brick, stone, and brick/stone-veneer construction that's going to have to be examined pretty carefully now.

      A big problem will be chimney fires come fall. It doesn't take much of a kink in a chimney to cause a hot spot. The word has to be put out now to get those inspected. And start early, because there aren't nearly enough trained people to look at it all once the weather turns.

      [Can I ask for a Mod Up? -- unless the media clues-in and emphasizes inspections, people aren't going to know. Getting this post visible will at least have the /.ers out there advised to get their chimney checked. Chimney fires suck because they tend to go un-noticed till the attic is on fire, usually after you've gone to bed.)

    13. Re:5.5? Feh! by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Kitchener ON. Stuff was rattling on the shelves here... about 150 miles southwest of the epicenter.

      The largest earthquake ever recorded in the U.S. was in 1964 in Alaska. It was 9.2 on the Richter scale. The second largest measured earthquake. In contrast the New Madrid Earthquake (about 150 miles south of Saint Louis on the Mississippi River) was estimated from 7.5 to 8.1. However, the geology of the Midwest (one big piece of underlying bedrock covering most of the U.S. Midwest and Southern Ontario) allows the effects of an earthquake to be felt with little diminishment quite far from the epicenter, unlike earthquakes in zones like California (where the effects are not transmitted anywhere near as far). The underlying reason for the New Madrid Earthquake Zone looks to be a failed rift valley causing a weak spot in the sheet of bedrock covering the Midwest.

      Also, ca. 300 years ago there was an estimated 8.7 to 9.2 Megathrust Earthquake off the Cascadian coast in 1700 (off the west coast of North America from mid Vancouver Island in B.C. Canada, and down along Washington and Oregon States. This was large enough to cause a large tsunamis to strike the coast of central Japan. It is expected that this area will experience this type and magnitude periodically (every ca. 500 years). I know in Vancouver, and most of coastal B.C. for that matter, that extensive earthquake retrofitting has taken place, and new buildings have to meet tough earthquake codes.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    14. Re:5.5? Feh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clearly posting AC because he owns a chimney inspection service in Ottawa....

  13. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quebec's finally separating!

  14. Known hazard area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's in part of Canada that is prone to earthquakes, extending roughly along the Ottawa and St. Lawrence River Valleys. The increased activity along here is related to two factors: 1) this is an old "suture" where pieces of continents were accreted onto the rest of North America a long time ago (the later half of the Paleozoic) culminating in the building of the Appalachian Mountain system (the Appalachian Orogeny); 2) the suture stopped being an active plate boundary after the continental pieces were fused onto the continent, but crustal stress still occurs because of the relatively "recent" melting of the continental ice sheets ~10k years ago. The weight of the couple kilometres of ice during the glaciation depressed the crust, and much of central Canada has been experiencing isostatic rebound (i.e. rising back up again) ever since the weight was removed. That process slowly deforms the crust, and when the stress gets too great the rock moves, generating earthquakes. The stress tends to get released along old zones of crustal weakness (i.e. #1).

    This seismic hazard map by the Geological Survey of Canada shows the increased risk along the St. Lawrence River rather nicely. More details here.

    Having said all that, the level of activity in this part of Canada pales in comparison to earthquakes in the area of an active plate boundary, such as California, where the deformation rates are higher, the earthquakes more frequent, and often higher magnitude. It means that building codes along the St. Lawrence-Ottawa River Valleys are fairly strict when it comes to earthquake resistance, just in case, but a significant earthquake is still outside most people's everyday experience. I'm sure people are freaking out (I'm ~1000km away, so I felt nothing).

    1. Re:Known hazard area by cuby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or simply...That area is in a rift valley (not a small thing): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottawa-Bonnechere_Graben

      --
      Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
  15. I'm impressed! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you felt this quake, it would be great to put your location in the title of your comments, below -- with lat/long coordinates even better.

    ...but do NOT post your zip+4 code, as that would be a huge invasion of privacy. :D

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  16. CHAOS in Upstate New York by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Funny

    I looked outside and saw wrecked cars strewn about. Some cars are overturned and on fire. Some buildings appear to be deteriorating in front of my very eyes.

    They I remembered I'm in Upstate New York. People here can't drive. The state is broke. Yesterday looked pretty much the same.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:CHAOS in Upstate New York by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd wager that anyone who moderated my comment "funny" hasn't been to Upstate New York (or not for very long). I was really expecting to be moderated "informative" or "insightful" instead.

      Oh well, you can't always get what you want. And on the roads here you're lucky to get anything better than rear-ended.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  17. Re:Can 5.5 even be felt at ground zero? by Kymermosst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's unusual for the location.

    No, it isn't.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  18. Waterloo, Ontario by kbahey · · Score: 2, Informative

    They have revised it down to 5.0 per the USGS.

    I did feel it. Was on a recliner sofa working on my laptop, and felt the sofa rock back and forth. Did not think it was a quake at the time. See
    http://baheyeldin.com/places/canada/earthquake-2010-june-23-1341-quebecontario.html">here.

  19. Re:You big babies. It's 5.0, not 5.5. by Minwee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No kidding. There was a 5.7 quake down here a week ago - you know who cared? No one. But a 5.0 (not 5.5, reported by TFA) hits Canada, and it's a front page slashdot story.

    Don't worry. When California gets its largest quake since 1935, people will stand up and notice that too.

  20. Whew, I was worried there for a minute by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    61 kilometres north of Ottawa

    Thank God. That's thousands of miles from America.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  21. Heads will roll by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Any word on who they're planning to charge for failing to predict this monster?

  22. Obligatory xkcdsucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
  23. Kingston Ontario, 44.227644,-76.491965 by codegen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is already a wikipedia entry for it (almost 1 hr ago) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Ontario_earthquake

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  24. Felt it in Montreal, QC by anstice8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I felt it in Montreal, QC, It's the first one I've felt since i was born and I'm 21, so for anyone saying its common then do your research. Just because everyone's talking about it doesnt mean we're freaking out over it, I felt more shaking this morning with construction on my street, so it's not a big deal other than it being rare.

  25. Re:Dr. Evil? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was pretty cool.

  26. Re:Westland Mi and Forest Park Il by DriedClexler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are we talking about the same Michigan? I was on a flight that landed in Detroit at about 2pm CST, and on the way to my destination I saw NUMEROUS buildings just devastated by the earthquake, a lack of essential services, disruption of civil order, severe deterioration of roads and infrastructure, looting in broad daylight ... you name it.

    They must have been near the earthquake's epicenter.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  27. Exaggerate much? by Noren · · Score: 2, Informative

    I lived in Calgary for a couple of years, which is warmer than Edmonton but not by all that much. It never got anywhere near that cold.

    Since recordings began, the only time it dropped to -40C or lower in downtown Edmonton was January 26, 1972. That was a Wednesday, not a Tuesday, by the way.

  28. Felt Downtown Toronto by inhuman_4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    My lab is on the 4th floor of an old building downtown Toronto and I definitely felt it. I have lived in this area my whole life and have never felt an earthquake before. At first I didn't know what it was, once I figured it out I started moving to the stairs.

    I know lots of people get more and bigger earth quakes then this, but for a first timer like me it's pretty freaky. Ancient 400lb spectrum analyzers don't normally move.

    lat=43.660153
    lon=-79.376972

  29. Glacier rebound + earthquake facts by Tarantura · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just making sure everyone knows their facts: Remember magnitude doesn't measure INTENSITY of shaking but instead amount of energy released at the moment the earthquake begins. Yes, the scale is logarithmic. So, a 5.0 earthquake is 32 times stronger than a 4.0, with a 6.0 releasing more than 1000 times the energy of a 4.0. Feeling that 5.7 on the 15th of this month here in SoCal, the first thing that pops in my head is "How strong is this one going to feel - is it the Big One"? It's actually quite cool to be able to feel the P-waves arrive first followed by the S-waves if the earthquake is both strong enough and far away enough for speed differences to be noticed. It's also nice to notice someone mention the glacial rebound earthquakes of areas in far NE U.S. and S.E. Canada - that's the first thing I guessed the moment I heard about it.

  30. Re: by thunderlive · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm from Hamilton, Ontario Canada my house shook a little, felt odd that's all. 4312'50.61"N 7947'19.50"W

  31. Re:You big babies. It's 5.0, not 5.5. by ailnlv · · Score: 2

    no, the exact formula is 2/3 log(M)-10.7. Therefore, a full step is actually 10^(3/2) (approximately 31) times stronger, not 10.