Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Gets a Vuvuzela Button (Seriously)

teh31337one writes "YouTube always has had a way with pranks. Some time in the last hour, the world's largest video portal activated a new button on some videos that looks like a tiny soccer ball. Clicking it will activate an endless, incredibly annoying sound that sounds vaguely like a swarm of insects. Or, for anyone who has been watching the World Cup, like the dreaded vuvuzela — an instrument commonly played in South Africa at football (soccer) games. South Africa is, of course, the host country for this year's World Cup, and fans watching the games have been subjected to the vuvuzela's mindless drone for hours on end. The noise is so annoying that television networks have taken measures to filter it out, and guides have popped up showing viewers how to block it from their TV sets and computers. I'm not seeing the button show up on all videos, but it is definitely appearing on some clips that aren't soccer-related."

53 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Or how about... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Or how about... by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      ha ha ha, Blocked by my workplaces internet filter for "proxy avoidance"
      Anyone using that to avoid a proxy is insane.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Or how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Particularly awesome while browsing the local obituaries, as it sounds like a massive swarm of flies.

      BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...

    3. Re:Or how about... by fcbs · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about listening vuvuzelas non-stop? There is an online radio broadcasting vuvuzela sounds 24/7 @ http://www.vuvuzela.fm/ My neighbours love it, or so I guess... :D

  2. dreaded? by unixcrab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dreaded? Incredibly annoying? Come one, it's just a trumpet. I get the feeling that after all the prophets of doom predicted the stadiums wouldn't be finished and the fans would be murdered by criminals, they have nothing left to complain about except the little trumpets.

    1. Re:dreaded? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Come one, it's just a trumpet.

      No it isn't. You can get a tune out of a trumpet.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:dreaded? by RadioElectric · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, the vuvuzelas in the stadium are one thing but this has actually had a much more annoying effect back home (UK). They're selling vuvuzelas over here now, which means that there are people staggering around our city centres with low-tech airhorns (yes, they are that loud in-person).

    3. Re:dreaded? by krou · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bollocks. You can get a tune out of a vuvuzela, too. Don't know if that video is visible for non-UK viewers, so here's a clip of it on YouTube.

      I don't know how to play a keyboard, and if I bang the keys and make a racket, does that mean it's no longer a keyboard?

      --
      'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    4. Re:dreaded? by clickety6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come one, it's just a trumpet

      REMEMBER JERICHO !!

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    5. Re:dreaded? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dreaded? Incredibly annoying? Come one, it's just a trumpet.

      Have you actually fucking heard the noise just coming over the television? Are you deaf? Or is your opinion simply irrelevant to any normal person's perception of what is annoying?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  3. Re:Annoying... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh come on, April Fools Day' is the Internet at its most amusing just for stuff like this. You know it's only a temporary change.

  4. Re:Annoying... by Spad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well you've got to mimic the Facebook, otherwise how will you attract all those cool, intelligent people who use social networking sites to your services?

  5. So... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Being that I'm from the US, I didn't need yet another reason to hate soccer... but, thanks Youtube for giving me another one!

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    1. Re:So... by BoofBaf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i have never understood why some people take such great pride in hating something

    2. Re:So... by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 4, Funny

      i have never understood why some people take such great pride in hating something

      Yeah, I hate it when people act that way!

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    3. Re:So... by dc29A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's what I was asking myself all the time, then with every single FIFA World Cup I am reminded why:

      Incompetent referees: US being denied TWO game winning goals in TWO different matches (no refs, those weren't off sides). Brazil scoring a goal after a double handball (that fucked CIV for sure). Villa from Spain slapping a Honduras player: no infraction (should have been a straight red card)! And I won't even mention the hand of Henry. While most major sports have evolved to use video replay, not the FIFA! No sir! And even if you have clear video of players blatantly cheating, the FIFA won't do shit: see Ireland being fucked over by Thiery Henry and France. The FIFA is so stuck up and stubborn that even when Henry said: "Yes I cheated", they didn't do a thing.

      Cheaters: Asshole Italian (De Rossi, I know, I am shocked too, Italian divers, who would have tought?! He did same exact thing in 2006.) dives in the Kiwi penalty area to get his team a penalty shot. I am pretty sure Italians have discovered a new force in nature because being pulled back from your shirt, somehow miraculously they fall forward! Endresult: Kiwis are fucked. Italy, France and Brazil along with Christian Ronaldo are masters of diving. As soon as one of their players is touched, they dive. Couple this with incompetent referees and a broken referee system and you got a clusterfuck of bad calls.

      Playacting: Kaká being sent off with with double yellow card because Keita from CIV was "writhing" in immense pain on his head after being touched in the chest. I wish I had this insane ability of Kaká, just touch someone and this dude is in mega pain! Oh and let's not mention Miroslav Klose from Germany sent off as well because of obvious play acting from the serbian side. His first yellow card was completely unwarranted.

      Every single game, watch players agonize in pain as if they are dying, 20 seconds later they are back on their feet and trucking along. Now watch a hockey game with a player receiving a puck in the face, losing a few teeth, bleeding, sits down on bench a few minutes, gets patched up and goes back playing. All this without one single moment of agonizing in pain, and I am willing to bet he was in infinitely more pain than the football player. Football is slowly becoming a joke, becoming almost as bad as WWE wrestling. The difference between WWE and football is that football is only partially acted out versus WWE is all acting. This is very unfortunate because the game is beautiful, but it's being ruined by a federation, the FIFA, stuck in a 1920 mentality and of course by the hordes of players who abuse the system to cheat.

      PS: GO ORANJE!

    4. Re:So... by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Popular football causes violence, racism,

      There's no evidence that the degree of popularity of football in a society contributes to greater levels of violence and racism.

      It is perhaps defensible that popular football provides a focus for the violence and racism already in a society, but that's a very different thing than causing violence and racism.

       

    5. Re:So... by IICV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Easy, for me at least to answer. Popular football causes violence, racism, hours lost at work, wasted money, hours of TV and news coverage is lost; and a small minority. who are already rich, are the only ones to benefit.

      There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

      You are only seeing the downsides because you choose to ignore the upsides; how many people's quality of life becomes better due to these games? There is more to life than just work work work after all.

      Also, saying that football causes violence and racism is like saying the Ku Klux Klan caused violence and racism - they don't, they're just an excuse to be violent and racist. If your people weren't already violent and racist, football wouldn't cause them to behave that way.

    6. Re:So... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 4, Informative

      What reasons would that be, as opposed to those to call handegg boring? ;) (In terms of sports, I’m a shooter (online) and rally (offline) guy, so if you think I care about “sides” here, it’s all in your head.)

      I'm sure you've heard them before, but let's see how much of my still bad karma I can burn into oblivion answering honestly:

      The games are long and boring.

      The goal nets are too small.

      They don't score enough points (prolly due to the net's small size).

      The transitions are obvious.

      The players are wimps.

      The refs are blind.

      The fans riot violently; often causing mass destruction.

      Now add vuvuzelas!

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    7. Re:So... by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about stubbornness, it's about corruption. Bear in mind that FIFA is a predominantly French organisation, or it would have the letters in a sensible order. As it stands you can fix a game by bribing one person, who always has plausible deniability that he was unsighted or some other bullshit.

      When England or the USA win the final with an Argentina style "header" - that's when FIFA will introduce video replay - retroactively.

      P.S. Were you looking for your bike?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:So... by dc29A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The FIFA could give each team three video decisions (like the three substitutions they have) challenge opportunities. When a team notices a ruling against them that has serious consequences (red card, goal disallowed, handball, etc...), they can stop the game and ask for a video ref's ruling. It would only interrupt games something like six times max per game. Yes it would lose a bit of fluidity but for the integrity of the sport, video replay is required.

      Also, post play, referees could go through the footage and identify divers and play actors. Those will be sanctioned post game with red cards and/or suspensions. Worse, if they notice chronic play acting or diving from a team (I am looking at you Italy!), then they could suspend the entire team.

      Unless the FIFA starts reclaiming the integrity of the game with serious sanctions against players and/or teams, the game will be plagued by cheating, diving and acting.

  6. MOD PARENT UP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I Like This!

  7. For the americans by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Funny

    Soccer is what the rest of the world follows for sports as they don't have access to baseball or football or basketball or hockey.

    Some americans do play soccer, mostly because mothers consider it to be more harmless then a sport where you hit others with a baseball and spit on your balls, gay men jump each other, or the kid ain't black or japanese or the mother is against open warfare on ice. (European impression of US sports).

    The vuuzela is something soccer fans blow because they are bored out of their mind and hate their neighbour but rioting is forbidden. Average EU soccer fan does hockey on the stands.

    As an EU citizen who has been to both EU and US sports events, don't bother Americans. Your sports might be impossible to comprehend for non-natives but the atmosphere is a thousand times better.

    For the EU soccer fans, attent a US sports event once and make it clear you are a foreinger, the Americans will welcome the newbie and show you everything, just remmeber that they like to play pranks and so will offer you a drink of cooled piss and pretend it is beer. Just smile politely and drop it somewhere. It is all part of the experience.

    Oh yeah BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:For the americans by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And, as a side benefit for tourists, you should note that American sporting stadiums are, by and large, riot free. So if you get piss drunk, punch the person in front of you, then light your pants on fire and throw them at a player as he's exiting the field; you will likely be arrested. You are only allowed to act this way in Detroit.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:For the americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > will offer you a drink of cooled piss and pretend it is beer

      Yeah, last time I visited the US they pulled this one on me in every single bar I went. Even the shops sold it in cans, pretending it was real beer! You guys sure love your pranks, that's for sure! :-P

    3. Re:For the americans by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It also suggested that part of the reason for not watching soccer is a distaste for a draw - there has to be a winner, someone has to win and someone has to lose no matter how well the game is played.

      First of all, American Football used to have draws, and people watched it just as much.

      Second, why do people keep searching for some mystical explanation for why Americans don't watch soccer? It's not that complicated. The United States has a HUGE number of sports to watch. It's a mass market. Individuals gravitate to which sports are the most interesting to watch. The market has spoken. Soccer is less interesting to most individuals in the United States than other sports.

      It really is that simple. I can go into the reasons *why* soccer is less interesting than other sports to me, but it's not because of some stupid reason like "it wasn't invented here."

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:For the americans by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Soccer is less interesting to most individuals in the United States than other sports.

      It really is that simple. I can go into the reasons *why* soccer is less interesting than other sports to me, but it's not because of some stupid reason like "it wasn't invented here."

      I would buy that, except Americans watch fucking golf, the world's most boring sport. (Thanks a lot, Scotland.)

      And let's face it, baseball can be pretty freaking boring too. Throw the damned ball already! No, not to first base! And there are how many more innings of this?!

      (Disclaimer: I'm joking and American.)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    5. Re:For the americans by Draek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A physically slow kid playing football is very much like a physically weak kid playing rugby: unless he *vastly* compensates for his shortcomings in other areas he's going to get himself and his team owned, and hard.

      But perhaps you just don't notice because in the US the competence level in football is fairly poor to begin with, so as long as you've still got two legs you aren't that far from the average. In a country like Argentina however, you'd be fucked.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
  8. Re:Annoying... by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Far more annoying than either of these are the fucked-up popup "slide window" ads that obscure the bottom 1/3 of every fucking video on Youtube these days.

    I've taken to just clicking the Download Helper button and downloading whatever video to my desktop, so I don't have to see those stupid annoying ads and can actually see the video I was looking for.

  9. Memes by Jojoba86 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is my new favourite internet meBBBBBBBbbbbbbbbzzzzzzzzzttttttttttttttttTTTTTT.

  10. vuvuzela? by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    sounds like some part of a woman's anatomy

    vuvuzela button: sounds like some part of a woman's anatomy i'm not aware of, but should be aware of

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. Warning! Sensible Recommendation Ahead! by RaceProUK · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just don't click it. It's not like it's labelled 'Do Not Click'.

    --
    No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  12. Re:Annoying... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    all those cool, intelligent people who use social networking sites to your services?

    Do not want!

  13. South Africa and the vuvuzela by slasho81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The one legacy the vuvuzela will have after the World Cup is the future exclusion of South Africa from ever again hosting any international sporting event.

    1. Re:South Africa and the vuvuzela by slasho81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just because it's labeled "culture" doesn't make it any less of an annoyance, if not to everyone then at least to international spectators at stadiums or at home.

      South Africa should have taken a lesson from China. In preparation to the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games, China outlawed spitting in public. Spitting, clearly part of China's "culture", is considered an annoyance to international visitors. China considered these visitors their guests and appropriately catered to them.

  14. Re:Annoying... by Mathinker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, how many products did you buy because of YouTube ads last year? Was it enough? Meh.

    Your comment seems very similar to "every download is a lost sale", because, to me, at least, it's pretty clear that "Moryath" isn't going to buy anything advertised in that irritating way --- in fact, I wouldn't even be surprised if he might actually consider boycotting products pushed by "those stupid annoying ads". In that case, his avoiding the ads is doing the advertisers a favor.

    And you know what? I even think he's smart enough, in the case where he thought that his behavior was actually damaging Google (and it's not clear that it even is, because I'm certain that Google counts his download as a "view", and I'm not certain that Google doesn't charge advertisers based on the popularity of the clips they are supposed to pop up on, even if they don't get clicked), to move to a different tool which would block the ads while giving Google their share of payback from the advertisers.

  15. Re:Annoying... by bami · · Score: 5, Informative

    Adblock Plus takes care of these, haven't seen one ever on my desktop/laptops.

  16. Presented Without Comment by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  17. Re:Annoying... by cojoneees · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your assumption regarding the rating system of youtube is wrong. The like/dislike system was adopted as a consequence of the rating habits of youtube users not in an attempt to mimic facebook. The majority of the videos on youtube were either 1* or 5* with mostly nothing in between.

    The like/dislike mechanism is an evolution of a system that is trying to adapt itself to its user base.

    You can read more about this on the official youtube blog - http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2009/09/five-stars-dominate-ratings.html

    Cheers.

  18. Re:Football man, Football!! by aBaldrich · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Football is a game where you move the ball with your feet, not with your hands.

    >Of course you could just be an ignorant British ethnocentrist who doesn't realize that you're about the only ones calling it by that exact word.

    The name is not only used in English (the language of England) but also in German (Fussbal), French (football), Spanish (fútbol), Portuguese (futebol), ...

    >most of the English speaking world call it soccer

    According to wikipedia, you are wrong.

    >so fuck off

    so grow up

    --
    In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
  19. Re:I tried watching... by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Informative

    may have cost them some American's

    Here in America, we Americans don't put apostrophes in "American's" unless it's possessive. i.e. "Scientific American's in-depth article on electronic Vuvezeula noise filtering". It's possible apostrophe rules are different where you live, such as England or South Africa, but I doubt it :)
     
      http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  20. Untrue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Vuvuzela's are South African culture, if you dont like it, dont what any of the games, we couldnt care less what you did.

    No, the vuvuzela is not part of South African culture. It's a freaking Mexican horn, and wasn't even available in South Africa until 2001, when some crappy plastic company started churning the god-awful things out down there.

    It's no more part of their culture than OS X is.

  21. not that bad... by Goldsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the biggest complaint to come out of the first world cup in Africa are the cheap noisemakers, I'd call that a win. Sure, your typical South African may be upset that people are complaining about the horns, but the organizing committee has to be thrilled that people are not complaining about violence, a lack of organization, or any of the other things people were worried about when South Africa was announced as the host.

  22. A cultural tradition dating 9 years ago by aepervius · · Score: 4, Informative

    Those triompet in their form at footbal match are only commercialized recently. The traditional one don't even have that form or noise.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  23. Re:Annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, for once in your dreary, lonely life, just laugh and appreciate harmless spontaneity, you hopelessly miserable, cynical person.

  24. Re:Annoying... by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, I'm not a "leecher."

    On the other hand, I came to see the video. If they want to run a 5-10 second bit before the video plays, like many other video sites do, I have absolutely no problem with that. They need their advert money, fine. If they want to put ads down the right side, as long as they're not neon flashing crap or those annoying expanding "a truck runs all across your screen covering up the article you came to read" flash ad crap, fine.

    Where I get annoyed is that the ads are actually BLOCKING MY VIEW OF THE VIDEO. Many times, it's blocking my view of a foreign news clip or something else that has subtitles (like Auto-tune The News), which means the subtitles themselves are getting blocked.

    Google/Youtube needs to learn: STOP FUCKING COVERING UP THE VIDEO. It's damn annoying and no, it does NOT make me more likely to buy the advertised product. Far from it, I'll get even more pissed off if I mis-click the tiny-ass little "x" button to get the fucking thing to go away, and then either have a new page popup happen, or have my browser wander away from the video entirely.

  25. Re:Annoying... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your comment seems very similar to "every download is a lost sale", because, to me, at least, it's pretty clear that "Moryath" isn't going to buy anything advertised in that irritating way --- in fact, I wouldn't even be surprised if he might actually consider boycotting products pushed by "those stupid annoying ads". In that case, his avoiding the ads is doing the advertisers a favor.

    Remember X10, the little computer-interfaced security camera company? I was actually interested in buying a number of their products -- mostly to satisfy vague James Bond-only-nerdy urges -- ha ha, I can see it's the pizza guy who just rang my doorbell without leaving my computer!

    That is until they began a marketing blitz of pop-up ads. I recall it as the first such assault I experienced. And I vowed never to buy products from such a company. And I haven't.

    If blocking the pop-up ads on Youtube hurts the advertiser, and especially if it hurts Google, then good. Maybe they'll recognize that they're being hurt by their own behavior, and change their policy.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  26. Re:Annoying... by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also, it's youtube. You know what's more annoying than websites all mimicking each other? 99.9% of the content on youtube, that's what.

    The vuvuleza sound is actually quite an improvement. For instance, this morning one of my friends had sent me a link which turned out to be two minutes of a video of a rabbit, not doing anything. The buzzing sound gave it an ominous tone which was highly amusing, like the bunny was very very slowly moving toward a swarm of evil robotic bees.

    The top youtube videos, what you might expect to be the cream of the crop, are even worse: "Justin Bieber LOVES Chinese Guy!" I can't imagine a horrible buzzing noise degrading the quality of that one. A bunch of clips from the world cup, most having already been taken down, a buzzing noise would at least be something. "Seattle Cop Punches Woman - Raw Footage " didn't have the option, a buzzing noise masking the incoherent shouting would have been nice.

    It really failed to improve "Super Mario Beatbox" though.

  27. Re:Football man, Football!! by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Football is a game where you move the ball with your feet, not with your hands.

    Actually, some games called "football" forbid moving the ball with your feet. The etymology is not clear, but there's a strong case that the term refers to the fact that the players are on foot (as opposed to, say, being on horseback).

    most of the English speaking world call it soccer

    According to wikipedia, you are wrong.

    Really? You're using India, Chad and the Sudan as counterexamples? Let's take a look at countries where English is the primary language, and...whoops, there goes just about every blue spot on your map! Anyway, what they really call it in India is "not cricket so who cares?" :)

    (To be fair, I've seen sources that suggest that Australia and Ireland should be in the "disputed category" rather than the "soccer" category.)

    I also note that the article linked to that map you referenced says of those countries that call it "football", "In many of these countries, the term "soccer" is also widely used." This leads to the possible conclusion that both the statements "most of the English-speaking world calls it 'soccer'" and "most of the English-speaking world calls it 'football'" are both true. Without further hard evidence, I have to conclude that both you and the person you're responding to are talking out your asses. :)