Slashdot Mirror


ICANN Approves .xxx Suffix For Porn Websites

An anonymous reader tips news that ICANN has officially approved the creation of a .xxx suffix for porn sites, confirming the rumors we discussed on Thursday. While this resolves a 10-year debate on the subject, the Guardian notes that "many pornography companies are unhappy with the idea of a dedicated space online because they expect that as soon as .xxx is implemented, conservative members of the US Congress will lobby to make any sex-related website re-register there and remove itself from other domains such as .com or .org." Others are more confident, like Stuart Lawley of ICM Registry, the company sponsoring the new TLD. "Mr. Lawley said more than 100,000 domains had preregistered. He said he expected that when the dot-xxx domains opened for business, nine to 12 months from now, some 500,000 domains would register, or roughly 10% of the five million to six million adult online sites."

62 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. 100,000 preregistered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure that 90% of those preregistrations are by domain name squatters.

    1. Re:100,000 preregistered? by ericlondaits · · Score: 4, Insightful

      DNS is just a big extortion racket... I can imagine that Google will make sure to register google.xxx, gmail.xxx, youtube.xxx, etc. just like Facebook and any other big site. Celebrities are probably being advised to register their names (e.g. sandrabullock.xxx). It's the same as with the .net and .org domains defensive registering but much worse.

      Ironically, big porn sites will probably want to keep their .com domain around anyway. I can't imagine Vivid leaving vivid.com to someone else, to name one.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    2. Re:100,000 preregistered? by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm sure that 90% of those preregistrations are by domain name squatters.

      Of course they are, which is to be expected since this whole exercise is nothing more than registrars grabbing at cash.

      The sad part is all the uninformed idiots posting here who support the idea -- if even a fair number of Slashdot posters still don't understand why this is such a horrible idea then it's no wonder ICANN caved. On the one hand, they look good to the morons who have been pushing for this stupid idea for years, and on the other they were probably bribed with a huge amount money. Win win!

      For those wondering why .xxx is a terrible idea that is completely doomed to fail (at all the "official" goals at least, it will certainly succeed as the gravy train it's designed to be), read RFC 3675: .sex Considered Dangerous. It has all the same arguments being presented here, plus more.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    3. Re:100,000 preregistered? by h0dg3s · · Score: 4, Informative

      DNS is a protocol, you're thinking of TLDs.

    4. Re:100,000 preregistered? by Arkem+Beta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was also there when *cough* alt.sex was created; it took all the sex off mainstream usenet and put it in one tidy place. .xxx will do the same over time

      Because all companies restrict themselves to .com and other organisations stick to their respective .org, .net or .edu?
      Because all US based domains are registered under .us?

      I don't think .xxx is going to change anything at all, especially if ICANN introduces custom TLDs for sale.

    5. Re:100,000 preregistered? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Funny

      .sex Considered Dangerous

      Use a .rubber.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:100,000 preregistered? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You *always* need a tinfoil hat and crowbar. and sometimes your towel. these should be standard issue.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    7. Re:100,000 preregistered? by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You missed the point. They're going to make money!!

      After this they'll do the custom TLDs, then do away with the whole thing and eventually they'll sell us the domains we really wanted in the first place. Why let people pay once when they'll be happy to pay three or four times.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:100,000 preregistered? by abhi_beckert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Domain squatting is a completely separate issue. And one that has been solved in many countries —where I live it's outright illegal to domain squat, and protected using the same laws/infrastructure as trademarks.

      You can buy any domain you want here, but if someone else has a trademark — or if they're simply better known than you — then they can take it off you at any time. It's also illegal for anyone except officially approved registrars to sell a domain name, so taking control of a domain name someone else owns is always free.

    9. Re:100,000 preregistered? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nice brand you got there. Be a pity if it got associated with donkey pr0n.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. "Domain name squatters" by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Tries to imagine hot chick squatting on a domain)

    [fails, shrugs] I guess there really is a site for every kind of fetish.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  3. What is the point? by axl917 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All this will do is rake in registration $$$ and have zero effect on anything else. Take any site for example, like youporn.com. They will go register youporn.xxx so they have their name protected, and one will redirect to the other. If some other company tried to register youporn.xxx out from under them, the real site would just sue and claim it.

    They won't give up their .com addresses, so nothing will change.

    1. Re:What is the point? by ciderVisor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They will go register youporn.xxx so they have their name protected, and one will redirect to the other.

      But if the .com address always redirects to the .xxx address, then firewalls could be easily configured to disallow all .xxx domains.

      I guess that's one possible plus point.

      --
      Squirrel!
    2. Re:What is the point? by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most likely the .xxx will redirect to the .com so all internal and external links will remain working and you won't have to convert or test anything.

      Redirecting .xxx to .com is much faster, easier and cheaper than vice versa and without the risk of being blocked by firewalls or filters.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:What is the point? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're more likely to serve both from the same machine, just with different virtual host names. No need to redirect.

      Besides, at $60 a domain, when a dot.com is $10, that's obscene!

    4. Re:What is the point? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Besides, at $60 a domain, when a dot.com is $10, that's obscene!

      Well, obscenity is to be expected for that domain. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:What is the point? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So what you're saying is that getting screwed on the price is normal?

    6. Re:What is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      so what you're saying is you're not nearly as clever as the poster you replied to?

    7. Re:What is the point? by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There will be real effects. Consider - in the US we have had recent obscenity convictions against some porn producers seen as turning out content especially degrading to women (slapping, punching, spitting in faces, and faux rape.). We haven't had anything in well over a decade focused on non-violent porn, targeting gay porn selectively has apparently died out even in the south, and even such things as bondage and fisting videos get a pass, (but many of them are careful to have spoken discliamers from the submissives involved and various "no sluts were harmed in the making of this video" claims included to protect themselves). Scat probably would draw legal action, but the mainstream producers haven't tried that. The industry has been vocally extremely divided over violence for the last few years.
            I'd just about bet real money that some porn producers will use .xxx to prove they are being responsible corporations and trying to keep their material out of the hands of minors, because that would be another way to protect themselves from prosecution, and they seem to be willing to go to some trouble over creating an image that they are not one of 'those' porn businesses, but rather one of the 'other' ones. Some will see it as a financial hit to move content exclusively to .xxx domains, but others will see it as another way to avoid being the rare porn producer singled out.
            The bigest force actually working against this is the evangelical right, which usually sees no difference between a Girls Gone Wild video and Underaged Wet Mule Sodomizers part 83. If they focused their complaints on the companies that produce the kinkiest stuff, they'd get a lot more results from various justice departments, but then they would have to admit that some porn producers really do care if all the 'models' are over 18, really do show safe sex practices, or avoid violent sex, so don't hold your breath.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re:What is the point? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      The bigest force actually working against this is the evangelical right, which usually sees no difference between a Girls Gone Wild video and Underaged Wet Mule Sodomizers part 83.

      Of course they can't see the difference. To see it, they would have to watch it. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  4. Wtf is xxx? by bjourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is only in the US that xxx is equivalent to porn. In other languages, xxx means crossed over or censored. So why the fuck is the new tld called "xxx" when the porn link is only obvious to Americans? Isn't ICANN supposted to care about the whole world and not just the US? If they wanted a porn tld, they could have called it ".porn," ".adult" or even ".sex" both which would have been more logical than ".xxx" Is it because the word "porn" is so dirty you have to call it "xxx" instead and pretend it is something else?

    1. Re:Wtf is xxx? by Ziekheid · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope, xxx is actually recognised in a lot of countries. I have never heard of it meaning crossed/censored before.
      I just asked people from Germany, England, Belgium, the Netherlands and Sweden (IRC ftw) and they all knew what it meant.

    2. Re:Wtf is xxx? by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, quite a few languages use "xxx" as a placeholder for "adult", "porn" and the likes. I have seen it used as such in practically every country I've ever been to.

      Words like "adult", "porn", and -- to a lesser extend -- "sex" are English words that have no meaning in other languages. "xxx" is pretty universal in that it isn't actually a real word that would need translation.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Wtf is xxx? by Knoeki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd say it's more likely that has to do with the fact that they're people on the internet.

      --
      [ irc.p2p-network.net -> #zomgwtfbbq ][ http://zomgwtfbbq.info ]
    4. Re:Wtf is xxx? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incidently, no. "xxx" comes from old wordfilters on school nets, where blacklisted words were replaced by x's instead. Guess what sex got replaced with? Yup, "xxx".

      No, GPP is right. "XXX" far predates the widespread use of networking in schools, and comes from the movie industry. The story goes something like this: when the MPAA created its film rating system in the 1960s, they copyrighted all the ratings but X. So if you said you were making a G-rated or R-rated movie, say, you had to get the MPAA to sign off on it, but you could rate your movie X without any approval. If you submitted a porn movie (or occasionally a very violent movie) to the MPAA, they'd obligingly slap an X on it, but it wasn't a requirement. The porn industry being what it is, porn movie producers decided that just "rated X" wasn't strong enough to get their target audience's attention, and started slapping the label "rated XXX" on the hardcore stuff. It didn't really mean anything, of course, but it was apparently an effective marketing ploy. Eventually the MPAA decided that they didn't want to be associated with X and XXX at all any more, and stopped rating movies X altogether, replacing it in their ratings scheme with NC-17.

      Except for that last bit, all of this happened in the 1960s and early 1970s, at a time when the number of schoolkids using any kind of networking technology was vanishingly small. Trust me, when you register "barelylegalteenlesbians.xxx" it's not images of PLATO you'll be evoking.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:Wtf is xxx? by Jurily · · Score: 2, Informative

      well? you think "sex" means sex in other languages?

      Actually, it does in most languages. And where it doesn't, people do understand it.

    6. Re:Wtf is xxx? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In 1930s newspaper cartoon world, XXX means a barrel of rum.

      --
      This space available.
    7. Re:Wtf is xxx? by Supurcell · · Score: 5, Funny

      XXX means porn?! Looks like I'm going to have to rethink the domain name for my moonshine business.

    8. Re:Wtf is xxx? by Z34107 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which kind of makes them the perfect sample for evaluating a TLD.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
  5. it took me a while to figure this one out by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've been trying to get a .xxx domain for a long time, but I couldn't figure out why. The porn industry opposes it, the people who oppose the porn industry oppose it, and tech people generally oppose it. Took me a while to realize it was only some registrars who wanted some extra cash who kept bringing it up.

    My question is, why did ICANN finally relent? Were they bribed? Did they just become impatient over the issue that they've said 'no' to for over a decade? Is it possible to get anything passed through ICANN if you just ask enough times? Why is ICANN supporting this blatant rent-seeking?

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:it took me a while to figure this one out by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because the ICANN board is chosen by domain registrars who stand the most to gain by introduction of a new TLD.

  6. And Chinese Internationalized Domain Names by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Informative

    More importantly (at least according to Ars Technica) is that ICANN approved Chinese internationalized domain names in this same update notification. What's the big deal with the XXX domain? Okay so now I know that the porn site I'm going to is actually a porn site ... big deal. Ain't going to help filters all that much anyway unless it's required which would be really stupid and shortsighted. I think the changes for a billion Chinese speakers is bigger news.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  7. Terrible idea by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the concept behind the .xxx domain has the potential of leading the internet down a dangerous path. If the other TLD's are forced by their governing entity, e.g. the US government for the .com TLD, to prohibit pornographic content, the precedent will be set to segregate and regulate content.

    1. Re:Terrible idea by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to admit to mixed feelings about this. There's an obvious danger of censorship, and I don't want to see anything on the internet, porn or anything else, pushed into a walled garden. But I'm old enough to remember when .org and .net actually meant something, and I'd actually like to see much stricter standards applied to who can register for those. The precedent is already set; it just hasn't been followed for years. It's a dilemma.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  8. What a great opportunity to creep everyone out! by Aboroth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Register yourname.xxx as your personal homepage, and give it out to all of your friends and coworkers! When they ask, "Umm, is this...", respond with, "You'll just have to go find out, now won't you?", and follow with a wink and a wry smile. Of course, you always could, you know, if you wanted...

    1. Re:What a great opportunity to creep everyone out! by hedwards · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's an excellent way of getting sued for sexual harassment. Even if there isn't any porn on there, I suspect you could still find yourself sued or fired.

  9. why do people think this is a bad idea? by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i'm not talking about the religious nuts, i understand their point of view: they think a .xxx domain makes porn legitimate. as if not having a .xxx domain means POOF, all porn disappears. porn is a part of society, and some can argue it actually serves a valid purpose (harmless release of sexual frustrations). get used to it, (hypocritical) social conservatives, you have a better chance fighting the rising and falling of the tides. its not going away, ever

    but i'm talking about the porn purveyors: why are they fighting this? it's not a ghettoization, its a domain. yes, it makes it easy to censor sexual content. and what's wrong with that? if i have some kids in my house, and i want to black hole all .xxx domains, i should be able to do that. if a nation wants to blackhole all .xxx domains at a national level meanwhile: ok, this nation is retarded. as if not having .xxx means they won't engage in idiotic censorship? you make it easier for them? do you see iran and china quaking in their boots because censorship is hard? get real: a committed censoring asshole is a committed censoring asshole, the issue of easy or hard to censor is an issue for people who want to block the domain for legitimate purposes (kids in the house), not an issue for those who will censor no matter what

    and finally, there's the red herring of sexual content that shouldn't be grouped with porn, like sexual health. well if its sexual health, like how to put on a condom, its sexual health, end of discussion. its not pornography. yes, some assholes will try to group sexual health issues with porn. the existence of such assholes does not mean sexual health issues deserve to be with porn, just that there exists assholes in this world with harmful ideas about sexual health that you need to fight, and the existence or lack of existence of an .xxx domain does not change their existence or the need to fight them. in fact, let them make fools of themselves by trying to group sexual health topics with porn, and reveal to the thinking rational world what ignorant assholes they really are, bring their idiocy to the forefront

    the REAL point is that pornography is not some GOTCHA that tries to sneak up on innocent teenagers and corrupt their souls, this is social conservative bullshit (and fails to understand human nature). clearly defining and delineating pornographic content simply underlines the most important point here: pornography is something that people choose to consume, and if some hypocritical social conservative asshole doesn't like that fact, or is ashamed of that fact, then don't click on an .xxx domain, end of story!

    because no one is trying to trick you into recognizing that you have sexual urges

    fly the new .xxx flag loud and proud. its simply a healthy recognition of the fact that we are sexual beings, and we are happy and comfortable making a space for this material on our internet. LACK OF recognition of the validity of porn is the REAL problem, lack of an .xxx domain is an act of misplaced shame, and that's the real motivation behind ignoring the issue, and denying porn its own domain

    giving porn its own domain is sex positive, and good for society. really. every rational, self-aware human should celebrate this

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:why do people think this is a bad idea? by Aboroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here are some points in reply:

      -It is stupid to expect all porn to go to ".xxx".
      -Therefore it doesn't make it easier to filter porn, it means your filters have to have one extra line for "block *.xxx". Technically, it is a little more work to block porn now than it was before.
      -Who defines porn, anyway? What is it, exactly?
      -The only reason it exists is to print money, and everyone is jealous that they can't do that

    2. Re:why do people think this is a bad idea? by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > -It is stupid to expect all porn to go to ".xxx".

      Why should pornographers want to hide themselves? Really.

      They should want to make it as easy as possible for their customers to find them and there non-customers to avoid them.

      It serves both their capitalistic needs and their political interests.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:why do people think this is a bad idea? by mustafap · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. After all, these guys will be setting the Evil Bit, so it will be easier to filter them out!

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    4. Re:why do people think this is a bad idea? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Informative

      > -It is stupid to expect all porn to go to ".xxx".

      Why should pornographers want to hide themselves? Really.

      It's not about pornographers hiding themselves. Actually many pornographers will set up an .xxx domain as alternative to their existing .com domain. What they will not do is to give up their existing .com domain, which their customers know, which are likely linked from somewhere, and which are not so easy to filter.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:why do people think this is a bad idea? by Aboroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How does having a .xxx domain suffix make it easier to find the site? .xxx doesn't give the site special powers. Does having .org as the domain suffix make it easier for a charity to be found? Does .edu make it easier for a school to be found? Obviously, no. Either way you have to know the whole domain name, not just the suffix, and type it in your address bar or have it indexed by a search engine or something else.
      I'm just not buying that there is any economic incentive to the porn industry for having this.

    6. Re:why do people think this is a bad idea? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should pornographers want to hide themselves? Really.

      They should want to make it as easy as possible for their customers to find them and there non-customers to avoid them.

      Because there is a portion of non-customers who also want all their customers to be unable to find them as well.

    7. Re:why do people think this is a bad idea? by visualight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only I can decide what is porn and what is not porn.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
  10. Think of the children by RobinEggs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lawley says he expects to make $30m (£20m) a year in revenue by selling each .xxx site for $60, and pledges to donate $10 from each sale to child protection initiatives.

    If he actually gives $6 million per year to child protection causes the universe will implode out of shock and amazement.

    Also on children, are they supposing children will never stumble into a .xxx domain (or that .xxx can be blocked altogether), so now they're safe from porn? Because I'm sure that .xxx porn sites will never use pop-up loops or deceptive ads or auto-dialing trojans the way many .com porn sites have done forever. The new .xxx porn industry will be squeaky clean, with our children's welfare at heart!

    Not to mention the whole thing won't have any damn effect unless you simultaneously force current .com, .net, and .org porn sites to re-register in .xxx and drop their old domains, which will not happen.

    Furthermore, for the whole notion of giving adults an easy, consolidated place to access porn, let me give ICANN a big hint: whether it's porn, cracks, bomb making instructions, or whatever, the most obvious place to look for anything even vaguely taboo is always the one most flooded with scams, viruses, top lists, etc. which make the obvious places by far the most worthless places to look. I predict that absolutely all worthwhile porn will remain on .com sites for quite some time, and that .com sites will simply register the same domain registered under .xxx and redirect people back into the .com site.

  11. Wget syntax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's the correct syntax for wget to retrieve an entire TLD?

    wget -r *.xxx isn't working.

    1. Re:Wget syntax? by colinrichardday · · Score: 4, Funny

      The shell is swallowing the *.

      Try wget -r "*.xxx"

  12. $60 a year of which $10 to non-profit by Ziekheid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Each domain registration will cost $60 a year, with $10 going to a nonprofit organization promoting “responsible business practices” for the industry." Beside this being overly expensive for a domain name the fact that they donate $10 per domain to a nonprofit organisation is just wrong. Who are they to decide for us that this should be done? Aren't they supposed to be some sort of objective organisation when it comes to this?

  13. Re:Can't work by hedwards · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sure it can, if the registrar makes good on its pledge to ban child porn from the TLD, that would likely be a significant draw to porn sites. Especially ones that are asking for people to pay. With $60 a year in registration fees, it's not going to make much difference off the bottom line of a decent site, but being able to say that you're free of unadvertised impropriety can easily add up to big sales. People that frequent those sites are often times concerned about things like kiddie pr0n and becoming a victim of ID theft. If the registrar manages to crack down on that more than the .com registrars do, then it's likely going to make much larger sums of money.

  14. To be fair... by arielCo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pornography/erotica is a genre. So are Action, Romance, Documentary, etc. Is there a similar push to create the likes of .action, .docu, and .love ?

    And of course, the argument that certain content is especially sensitive hasn't been wielded to lobby for creating .hate, .religion or .violence

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    1. Re:To be fair... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the most important TLD: .evil
      Probably one of the requirements of this domain is that any servers set the evil bit.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:To be fair... by RobinEggs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I think it'd be a lot more useful to create a .kids domain and give people the walled garden they want. Heck, I wouldn't be opposed to having a .christ domain either, that way I can filter it out through my firewall and never have to worry about accidentally stumbling upon it!

      I'm not authoritative here, but I don't think walled gardens have done society much good where they've been tried. They certainly don't look very successful in China, North Korea, Utah, or anywhere else they've been seriously attempted.

      I couldn't tell, really, if you approved of the whole idea, were joking about your Jesus-free garden, or anything, but I thought it was worth making a serious reply in any case. Shutting yourself off rarely helps.

  15. phantomfive was close, you weren't by Mathinker · · Score: 3, Informative

    See this explanation. phantomfive (GP) was almost correct, except that the movie rating system didn't have any rating more obscene than "X", porn movie advertisers/marketers invented the "XXX" as even more shocking than "X". And because of the "misuse" of X, the MPAA has moved to calling it "NC-17" which is hard to twist into a marketing advantage.

  16. Of course, there's always... by allcaps · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's always a way around domain name filters. http://1113982824/

  17. and makes it harder for the consumer by XanC · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's what she said!

  18. What is porn? by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is porn and who gets to decide what business should relocate to the xxx domain? Whose standards apply in something that is in an international arena?

    And I can't wait for Four X beerto get into the porn market with a domain of xxxx.xxx (maybe the should sell some Seven X beer?)

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  19. do you buy cereal? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is it easier for you if the supermarket scattered the cereal boxes all over the store?

    or if they had one aisle labelled "cereal"?

    it's a rather simple point that most people easily grasp: better categorization has all sorts of benefits for all sorts of reasons

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  20. Re:Yet another TLD by Aboroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nobody is going to type in a random character string and add .xxx to try to find porn. The idea that ".xxx" will make it easier to find porn is a fallacy. It will still need to be indexed and linked to just like current sites.

  21. A waste of everyone time. by Tei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The porn sites don't want it, the anti-porn sites don't want it. Is not usefull for the purpose of a root domain. It will only serve to suck money from some sites that will register yet another domain and not use it.

    The ICANN is adding weigth on the idea to deprecate the ICANN.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

  22. Re:right by Aboroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My mind hurts.

    But, yeah, pretty much, those designations don't mean much of anything, and pretty much things are already not organized without search engines and indexes. Now you are learning!

    With some exceptions, of course; for instance if a site has a .mil address, we know it is for the military. But the fact that it had a .mil address didn't make it easier to find. It is also a special case since normal civilians can't get a .mil address.

    As for .org, .net, .com, etc., anyone can register them and there is no regulation whatsoever on what kind of sites they can be. In the end there is no real difference between them. Now we are just going to be adding .xxx to the list. It doesn't end up mattering at all.

    Here's a serious question. Someone gets online, lotion in hand, and wants to find some porn. Not just any porn, but porn that is right for them, and really gets their juices flowing. Other than guessing, which you don't need a .xxx domain for, how do they find it, without using a search engine or another site that links to it? How does .xxx on the site name help at all in finding the site?

  23. Re:For those which don't know by mtxf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Indeed, it is:

    1113982824 -> 0x42660768

    0x42 0x66 0x07 0x68
    __66_.102_.__7_.104

    104.7.102.66.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN PTR lax04s01-in-f104.1e100.net.

    66.102.7.104

    I did not know you could do this until just now, so thanks GP!

    (Also slashdot's layout mangling is awful, so please excuse the underscores)

  24. So, like, fluffycutekittens.xxx ? by axl917 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone should register that and put up an innocuous kitten pic, see what they do.