Alternatively, they were a startup with dubious research who over-promised on what their product could do (par for the course for startups) and were bought up by a big company who later realized they'd either been bamboozled or the cure that blinded them with dollar signs simply didn't work. Just because there were published articles doesn't mean they were totally legit or that their cure was very effective. Foul play or ill intentions don't even have to be involved, this medical research stuff is hard. What matters is if the research survives scrutiny over time and can be replicated and verified by others. It could simply be that more research was done internally and it was dropped when it didn't pan out like they'd hoped. Occam's razor isn't 100% clear-cut in this case as big corporations inherently behave like sociopaths, but it isn't obvious to me that "evil corporate conspiracy" is the most logical conclusion to jump to either.
Haha, my post got modded "Troll" by the anti-SJW crusaders. Looks like they are easily offended special snowflakes, just like the SJWs they hate so much.
I did not say that I cared what they thought, or even that anybody should care. All I said was that religious people are more likely to dislike swearing than SJWs. Be careful, your hatred is making you retarded.
Ah yes, when I think of who would be most likely to be offended by swear words, my mind also totally ignores the possibility of religious people. Intense hatred of SJWs that borders on unhealthy obsession is fun!
1. Decide the answer you want.
2. Ask a leading question.
3. Find a comfortable echo chamber that gives you the answer you want.
4. Don't look at sources. If you do by accident, ignore their validity and nuance.
5. Shout "fake news" if you accidentally see facts that challenge your pre-decided views, especially when unedited and with all relevant context included.
Maybe they should actually do something productive, then, like support candidates that have that position, and make their voices heard to politicians that don't. Instead, they say one thing, then do nothing about it, since that's what Jesus would do.
Republican is not synonymous with Christian. Many Christians are not Republicans, many Christians are not crazy, and there do exist Republicans who are not any combination of crazy or Christian. However, almost all crazy Christians are Republicans. The party is infested with them.
Don't worry about it, we don't need to take care of anything in the environment. Jesus gave us the Earth to rape for profit. I mean, how can we possibly affect the planet? It's so big! Even if we do end up fucking it up, we only move up the start date for the end times, and God will bail us out with the rapture. Not only will we be super rich, but then we get to go to heaven! Bonus!
You're still using an ancient Kindle yet everyone ELSE is a "fucking moron". Got it.
Replacing a device that works for its intended purpose with one that doesn't, simply because one wants something newer, is what I would call a "fucking moron."
Can you count? By looking at the map and practicing the difficult techniques taught on Sesame Street, we can see that there are more blue states than red states. The site says "updated 3 hours ago" so I know we looked at the same map. Not that the number of states is a good metric anyway, for reasons which I will leave you to deduce since I have confidence you can use your brain if you try.
This is almost a step in the right direction, but this doesn't go nearly far enough to teach young girls that only white people can be racist. There is always something to complain about in SJW-land! Everything is always your fault, doubly so if you're white! Quadruply so if you're a white male! FEEL GUILTY, GOD-DAMN IT!
Which reminds me- how dare you all assume this Barbie is a girl! If you use the wrong pronouns on him/her/it/shmim/shmer/shmit, you might seriously damage his/hers/its/shmis/shmers/shmits incredibly fragile SJW psyche! Make sure when your daughter/schmaughter learns how to properly feel like walking on eggshells when talking to the doll to properly emulate healthy real-world interpersonal relationships. You might want to buy the official "Barbie Safe Space" where the doll can be placed to avoid hearing opposing viewpoints, and be sure to get the closest thing to a proper life partner currently available for sale for Barbie, "Fully-Emasculated Feminist Ken!"
I can't wait to see the horrible job they do on the PC version! We'll see the classics like making the graphics worse so that the console players don't feel too bad, or just general horrible porting and performance. I bet Bethesda can make this the worst PC port yet!
My theory is that now that there are people who do nothing except design and tweak the user interface, they can't ever be "done" or else they risk people realizing how wasteful it is to have that job position and lose their job. Most of the time, once a UI is done and works well, it's best to leave it alone with the required minimal changes that need to be done be assigned instead to the general project maintainers, not specialized "UX" designers. They might actually think they're useful, like most people want to believe, so they'll come up with things to justify their employment. It's easy for them to set up and game a "study" to justify whatever change it is they want to make to the UI in order to keep busy and keep their job. The more drastic the change is, the more work it is, the more they can argue the merits of keeping their pointless job going, and the more controversy and fluff they can inflate their head with to self-justify their own importance.
That is an extremely short-sighted viewpoint. Money isn't everything. First of all, if all you care about it direct funding from it, they would easily be able to monetize this by reselling it at auction. Putting it in a museum would enrich people's lives, which is invaluable. Having displays with things like this, are ways people get inspired to do what they can to help in space exploration, either through their own talents or with donations. These "antiques" could very well inspire the next generation of space explorers, which are kind of necessary because the ones we have now are expected to die at some point.
Monthly payments for everything you use and pretend to own! From your music you listen to, to the movies you watch, to the software you use, to the storage space on the cloud where you keep all your data, and the physical hardware you pretend like you own. Pay for everything in your life, for the rest of your life! What a deal! Fall on hard times for a few months and miss a few payments, and watch your whole life disappear! Weeee!
Alternatively, they were a startup with dubious research who over-promised on what their product could do (par for the course for startups) and were bought up by a big company who later realized they'd either been bamboozled or the cure that blinded them with dollar signs simply didn't work. Just because there were published articles doesn't mean they were totally legit or that their cure was very effective. Foul play or ill intentions don't even have to be involved, this medical research stuff is hard. What matters is if the research survives scrutiny over time and can be replicated and verified by others. It could simply be that more research was done internally and it was dropped when it didn't pan out like they'd hoped. Occam's razor isn't 100% clear-cut in this case as big corporations inherently behave like sociopaths, but it isn't obvious to me that "evil corporate conspiracy" is the most logical conclusion to jump to either.
Haha, my post got modded "Troll" by the anti-SJW crusaders. Looks like they are easily offended special snowflakes, just like the SJWs they hate so much.
I did not say that I cared what they thought, or even that anybody should care. All I said was that religious people are more likely to dislike swearing than SJWs. Be careful, your hatred is making you retarded.
Ah yes, when I think of who would be most likely to be offended by swear words, my mind also totally ignores the possibility of religious people. Intense hatred of SJWs that borders on unhealthy obsession is fun!
Well, you gotta bring furniture but the house is free!
It's free real estate.
The books don't matter. If a movie can't stand on its own then it's crap.
More like:
1. Decide the answer you want.
2. Ask a leading question.
3. Find a comfortable echo chamber that gives you the answer you want.
4. Don't look at sources. If you do by accident, ignore their validity and nuance.
5. Shout "fake news" if you accidentally see facts that challenge your pre-decided views, especially when unedited and with all relevant context included.
Crowdfunding sites are not necessary for collecting money. I await your next stupid response.
Maybe they should actually do something productive, then, like support candidates that have that position, and make their voices heard to politicians that don't. Instead, they say one thing, then do nothing about it, since that's what Jesus would do.
Republican is not synonymous with Christian. Many Christians are not Republicans, many Christians are not crazy, and there do exist Republicans who are not any combination of crazy or Christian. However, almost all crazy Christians are Republicans. The party is infested with them.
Don't worry about it, we don't need to take care of anything in the environment. Jesus gave us the Earth to rape for profit. I mean, how can we possibly affect the planet? It's so big! Even if we do end up fucking it up, we only move up the start date for the end times, and God will bail us out with the rapture. Not only will we be super rich, but then we get to go to heaven! Bonus!
You're still using an ancient Kindle yet everyone ELSE is a "fucking moron". Got it.
Replacing a device that works for its intended purpose with one that doesn't, simply because one wants something newer, is what I would call a "fucking moron."
Can you count? By looking at the map and practicing the difficult techniques taught on Sesame Street, we can see that there are more blue states than red states. The site says "updated 3 hours ago" so I know we looked at the same map. Not that the number of states is a good metric anyway, for reasons which I will leave you to deduce since I have confidence you can use your brain if you try.
This is almost a step in the right direction, but this doesn't go nearly far enough to teach young girls that only white people can be racist. There is always something to complain about in SJW-land! Everything is always your fault, doubly so if you're white! Quadruply so if you're a white male! FEEL GUILTY, GOD-DAMN IT!
Which reminds me- how dare you all assume this Barbie is a girl! If you use the wrong pronouns on him/her/it/shmim/shmer/shmit, you might seriously damage his/hers/its/shmis/shmers/shmits incredibly fragile SJW psyche! Make sure when your daughter/schmaughter learns how to properly feel like walking on eggshells when talking to the doll to properly emulate healthy real-world interpersonal relationships. You might want to buy the official "Barbie Safe Space" where the doll can be placed to avoid hearing opposing viewpoints, and be sure to get the closest thing to a proper life partner currently available for sale for Barbie, "Fully-Emasculated Feminist Ken!"
#triggered #preferredpronouns #checkyourfuckingprivilegeyouwhitescum
I always wondered why the range of Terran marines was so shitty, they must use these bullets.
I don't think you know the definition of the word 'fungible.'
I can't wait to see the horrible job they do on the PC version! We'll see the classics like making the graphics worse so that the console players don't feel too bad, or just general horrible porting and performance. I bet Bethesda can make this the worst PC port yet!
My theory is that now that there are people who do nothing except design and tweak the user interface, they can't ever be "done" or else they risk people realizing how wasteful it is to have that job position and lose their job. Most of the time, once a UI is done and works well, it's best to leave it alone with the required minimal changes that need to be done be assigned instead to the general project maintainers, not specialized "UX" designers. They might actually think they're useful, like most people want to believe, so they'll come up with things to justify their employment. It's easy for them to set up and game a "study" to justify whatever change it is they want to make to the UI in order to keep busy and keep their job. The more drastic the change is, the more work it is, the more they can argue the merits of keeping their pointless job going, and the more controversy and fluff they can inflate their head with to self-justify their own importance.
I think Firefox would get a lot more loyal users if they replaced "Dotzler" with "Akira."
That is an extremely short-sighted viewpoint. Money isn't everything. First of all, if all you care about it direct funding from it, they would easily be able to monetize this by reselling it at auction. Putting it in a museum would enrich people's lives, which is invaluable. Having displays with things like this, are ways people get inspired to do what they can to help in space exploration, either through their own talents or with donations. These "antiques" could very well inspire the next generation of space explorers, which are kind of necessary because the ones we have now are expected to die at some point.
Unfortunately they have been getting smaller over time. They won't be stressing any physics simulation systems, that's for sure.
So was Steve Jobs.
Monthly payments for everything you use and pretend to own! From your music you listen to, to the movies you watch, to the software you use, to the storage space on the cloud where you keep all your data, and the physical hardware you pretend like you own. Pay for everything in your life, for the rest of your life! What a deal! Fall on hard times for a few months and miss a few payments, and watch your whole life disappear! Weeee!
Try to look at the silver lining. This kind of practice is perhaps the reason Steve Jobs is dead today, which makes the world a better place!
We are supposed to assume the numbers you have quoted aren't based on falsified data, which wouldn't be surprising,