Slashdot Mirror
German Airports Use Bees To Monitor Air Quality
The Düsseldorf International Airport and seven other airports in Germany have come up with a unique way of monitoring air quality; they use bees. The airports test the bees' honey twice a year for toxins, and batches that turn up clean are bottled and given away. From the article: "Assessing environmental health using bees as 'terrestrial bioindicators' is a fairly new undertaking, said Jamie Ellis, assistant professor of entomology at the Honey Bee Research and Extension Laboratory, University of Florida in Gainesville. 'We all believe it can be done, but translating the results into real-world solutions or answers may be a little premature.' Still, similar work with insects to gauge water quality has long been successful."
..meh. obviously they aren't using 'spelling' bees at the "aiport" (sorry, couldn't resist.. heh)
oh so that's where all the bees have gone to....http://viewzone2.com/lostbeesx.html
From the article: "Assessing environmental health using bees as 'terrestrial bioindicators' is a fairly new undertaking, said Jamie Ellis, assistant professor of entomology at the Honey Bee Research and Extension Laboratory, University of Florida in Gainesville.
Fairly new undertaking? I don't think so.
Set your phasers on "funky"!
Could bees be modern-day sentinels like the canaries once used as warning signals of toxic gases in coal mines?
Just what we need, there will be swarms of honey bees at airports, in parking lots, and at work, all testing the air quality. Somehow the whole "swarm of bees" thing scares me more than the actual pollution - at least canaries were cute.
with the Blackuweather airport forecast. Ollie, what's the air quality like there?
Ollie: [face covered in red welts and puffing up] It's full of bees!
The enemies of Democracy are
Research has found the air in Düsseldorf contains massive amounts of bee poop contamination.
Researchers are bereft of an explanation for this phenomenon but are going to try a control group of pigeons.
It's where you plug in your AI.
The enemies of Democracy are
In the US they would sell that honey in the airport at a 6000% markup.
"I'm not a quack, I'm a mad scientist! There's a difference." - Dr. Cockroach
"Assessing environmental health using bees as 'terrestrial bioindicators' is a fairly new undertaking, said Jamie Ellis, assistant professor of entomology at the Honey Bee Research and Extension Laboratory...
Surely this type of approach has probably been used long before, by farmers, or for that matter, an expert honey producer would have been aware of this, just by subtle changes in honey taste.
Many of our "green" approaches are really old methods that were abandoned when the western world was industrialized. Take windmills for example. We could learn a lot from new applications of old methods.
an Aiport is Sony's halfhearted, too-little, too-late, answer to Apple's new iPort, which is itself just a regular old airport except it has only one plane, that only flies one route in one direction at one time each day, and permits passengers to engage in only a certain limited number of approved activities once they arrive. It looks like it will put all the other carriers out of business.
how many pairs of boxer shorts should you own?
You are more afraid of bees then of the pollution?
I guess some people will only feel safe after every other life-form has been exterminated. Well for those pollution might actual be the solution.
with this being checked twice a year, I think they'll notice people getting sick months before the bees give any clues. I'd love to know the exact toxins that they are expecting to find. I didn't think that bees were huge consumers of air. If they want to speed up the process, simply wipe down the jet engines from landing planes and get a sample bees spattered all around the intake.
jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
By AI, do you mean my schlong?
Captcha: utilize!!!!!
This is a cool idea. Another approach is to use lichens, although there might not be enough trees or other suitable substrates nearby.
-- Neville Flynn
As someone who loves cuddly and non-cuddly animals - some of them even human - and who has worked with PETA people and found them to be a bunch of animal-killing lunatics(*), it saddens me that PETA has completely broken the good image of animal welfare. Not that it's always PETA directly - sometimes they are the extreme that the opposition use to belittle the mainstream. A small proportion of what they do may be considered reasonable: e.g. undercover examination of conditions in testing labs; pushing research for meat production which doesn't require farming a whole animal. But general practice and underlying philosophy mostly causes more harm to the animal (and, by extension, human) welfare movement.
Anyway, social bees are cool. If we're the top mammal, they're the top insect. Yet we've done a good job of fucking up native varieties by over-zealous import of bees who turn out diseased./ not to be so great in another environment (shock!). Let's return to finding out how we can help each other :-).
(*) Their belief being that it's better to kill an animal than let it suffer the torment of symbiosis with humans. It's a really, really, contradictory cult. The exceptions to the insanity are the student volunteers who don't really see how the business (I don't expect them to survive on misguided love alone, but Ingrid is rich) works.
how those Germans would use beer to monitor air quality ?
As a life-long Vegetarian and long standing Tree-hugger, I'd like to start a group devoted to the Eradication of PETA and GreenPeace.
Both groups may have started with the best of intentions (I'll give them the benefit of the doubt), but at this point they are a bunch of thugs who do more harm than good for their respective causes.
Anyone got a catchy name we can use?
.. and the lawsuits when someone is stung and suffers emotional distress (also because of a ruined holiday causing additional stress) due to the airport's 'faulty biological equipment'...
Also, PETA funds the Earth Liberation Front, an ecoterrorist organization.
I ate all your bees.
/Lonely Soldier
I'd say it's in the eye of the bee holder.
The last time I was in Germany, a few years ago, smoking was allowed everywhere, including the terminal of the Frankfurt airport.
Thus, it would be ironic to be measuring the air quality around the airport, while the actual airport customers are being gassed in the terminal.
Doing some Googling, it seems like Germany is smartening up and imposing smoking bans.
My wife and I are hobbyist bee keepers. A few comments
1) bees will fly several miles from their hive when looking for nectar and pollen. Of course i wouldn't expect a pefectly symmetrical distribution of bee activity in all 360 degrees and at all distances away from the hive. So siting the hive is a relevant concern
2) the collection of nectar/etc is non-uniform with the passage of time. the amount of material collected depends on things like colony size [which in turn depends on the amount of nectar collected.. yay for cross-talk in experimental variables :)]. The bees are obviously collecting much more when something nearby is blooming. However, bees mostly stay home in cold weather or rainy conditions. So the amount of foraging bees do as a function of calendar date depends on the bloom and the weather conditions.
One could say that the experiment ignores this by only taking two measurements... .. .which brings me to my final point: a hive is usually tended to considerably more often than twice in a season. the bees can put away a tremendous amount of honey in a short time if the colony is at full strength and there is a strong nearby bloom. if the hive becomes too crowded the colony will split and swarm. If the hive is made so large so as to be empty, it will be difficult to tell when a certain cell of comb was filled.
There are other factors: the creation of honey involves bees filling a cell with nectar and then vibrating their wings over that cell to manage the heat and evaporation. Any number of factors might affect the evaporative rate of the honey, like the local temperature or the rate at which a given cell was filled.
Certainly, some of the pollutants they are looking for would be affected by the evaporative rate of the water in the nectar, and without frequent monitoring and much higher precision data logging, i don't really know how you'd measure that.
So in summary: there is no guarantee that bees will go a certain place, much less at a certain time, nor is there any uniformity in how much work they do, nor in how they put up the nectar, nor in how they create the honey.
If the experiment is "i wonder how many airborne pollutants show up in a beehive after 1 season", then fine. But i wouldn't use it to measure anything else. I wouldn't even compare it to other beehives to see if airports create more pollution -- the activity of a given colony is simply not uniform.
My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
Beekeeper 2: Yes, a little too quiet, if you know what I mean.
Beekeeper 1: Hmm...I'm afraid I don't.
Beekeeper 2: You see, bees usually make a lot of noise. No noise -- suggests no bees!
Beekeeper 1: Oh, I understand now. Oh look, there goes one now.
Beekeeper 2: To the Beemobile!
Beekeeper 1: You mean your Chevy?
Beekeeper 2: Yes.
The beekeepers track their bees down to Homer's sugar pile.
Beekeeper 1: Well, very clever, Simpson, luring our bees to your sugar pile and selling them back to us at an inflated price.
Homer: Bees are on the what now?
Beekeeper 2: Simpson, you diabolical...we're willing to pay you $2000 for the swarm. [starts counting money]
Homer: Deal! [thunder crashes, rain starts]
Beekeeper 1: Oh, wait a minute. The bees are leaving.
Homer: No! My sugar is melting. Melting! Oh, what a world.
the canaries had a better lawyer than the bees.