Slashdot Mirror


Apple Hires Antenna Engineers. Really.

kangsterizer writes "Sometimes, news items are just about a good laugh. You may or may not like Apple, but the way it has been handling its antenna issue has been like a small tech soap opera — Steve Jobs, the CEO, saying 'not to hold the phone that way,' rumors of software issues, and the latest but most crunchy part, since the antenna issue has been widely discovered, on 23 June, several 'antenna engineer' positions opened up at Apple. Seems someone got fired: Antenna engineer job position 1, Antenna engineer job position 2, Antenna engineer job position 3." I just figure they did all their testing in California, where AT&T dropping calls is as common as $4 coffees.

78 of 417 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Messed up links by Pojut · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If you experience problems with links sending you to the wrong URLs, just don't click on them that way." -Steve Jobs, paraphrased

  2. as common as $4 coffees by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just figure they did all their testing in california where AT&T dropping calls is as common as $4 coffees.

    Shouldn't they cost more than $4 in Cali?

    1. Re:as common as $4 coffees by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Funny

      Believe it or not, some people still drink plain, black 12 oz coffees. The poor ones that can only afford $4!!! HAHAHAhahahahaaha. ha?

    2. Re:as common as $4 coffees by MoriaOrc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After a few tries, the interpretation I liked best was:

      $4 coffee is common in California implies AT&T dropping calls is also common implies that Apple testers didn't notice the antenna issue because their calls were getting they were used to getting many dropped calls anyway.

      As a Californian who doesn't drink much coffee and gets cell service through Verizon, I can't make any claims on the accuracy of their poorly written comparison..

  3. AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by recoiledsnake · · Score: 5, Informative

    From a memo to AppleCare reps:

    Exact procedures AppleCare reps must follow when dealing with any reception complaints regarding the iPhone 4.:

    1. Keep all of the positioning statements in the BN handy – your tone when delivering this information is important.

    a. The iPhone 4’s wireless performance is the best we have ever shipped. Our testing shows that iPhone 4’s overall antenna performance is better than iPhone 3GS.

    b. Gripping almost any mobile phone in certain places will reduce its reception. This is true of the iPhone 4, the iPhone 3GS, and many other phones we have tested. It is a fact of life in the wireless world.

    c. If you are experiencing this on your iPhone 3GS, avoid covering the bottom-right side with your hand.

    d. If you are experiencing this on your iPhone 4, avoid covering the black strip in the lower-left corner of the metal band.

    e. The use of a case or Bumper that is made out of rubber or plastic may improve wireless performance by keeping your hand from directly covering these areas.

    2. Do not perform warranty service. Use the positioning above for any customer questions or concerns.

    3. Don’t forget YOU STILL NEED to probe and troubleshoot. If a customer calls about their reception while the phone is sitting on a table (not being held) it is not the metal band.

    4. ONLY escalate if the issue exists when the phone is not held AND you cannot resolve it.

    5. We ARE NOT appeasing customers with free bumpers – DON’T promise a free bumper to customers.

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From the Customer Handbook:

      1. So you say there is a problem if I hold the phone the wrong way? (wait for response). Please show me the correct way.

      2. That seems very impractical and uncomfortable. I'm liable to get hand cramps. Is it true you have a rubber bumper that will fix the problem?

      3. Well since we've established the phone is defective, and this rubber bumper fixes the problem, then it should be free. So I'll give you a choice: Either give me a full refund for my phone, or fix the problem at no charge. Pick one. Or else I and a million other customers will drag you into court, and make your life a living hell.

      4. Remember:

      There's no excuse for corporations to Steal money from customers with inferior or defective products. The customer is not always right, but in most cases the Consumer Protection Laws are on your side. Previous corporations that challenged the U.S. Government typically lost, and the customers received refunds or free fixes.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Interesting

      P.S. This will probably get me modded down, but I don't care. Robin Hood helped the poor by taking-back what the rich had stolen from them. I consider this to be the same deal. (Especially since Apple received a taxpayer bailout - they stole that money IMHO.)

      - Buy rubber bumper.
      - Install on iPhone to fix its defect.
      - Return empty envelopes with tracking number.
      - Wait two months.
      - Call credit card company to explain that you returned the rubber bumper, and would like to be refunded the money. Provide tracking number.

      Apple owes every customer a free fix for their defective phone.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, isn't this credit card fraud?

      I suppose, if you had to pick *any* industry or group of companies larger than Apple to piss off, that would be a good one. However, I don't think it will end well for you if you give it a try.

    4. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by epiphani · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, because committing fraud is a reasonable response. How about you just return the damn phone.

      --
      .
    5. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe Apple should learn a thing or two from Samsung. My Omnia has the following on a sticker attached to the bottom of the battery cover:

      -----Internal Antenna Area----
      For best performance, Do NOT
      touch this area when using your phone

    6. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (Especially since Apple received a taxpayer bailout - they stole that money IMHO.)

      Excuse me what? Did you say Apple got a taxpayer bailout? You should probably back that up with some facts or other data first because I've never heard of it. They have so much cash they do not need any kind of bailout.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    7. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by Intron · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's true. The Receiving department of their iTunes office filled up with money and had to be bailed out with huge buckets several times.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    8. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by Afell001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Germany is one of those strange European countries that actually has (gasp) laws to limit bad labor practices. If your boss wants you to work overtime, even if you work just one hour overtime, you are allowed to take the next work shift off PAID in addition to the overtime pay you receive. You have 24 days of vacation in a given year (one month with weekends). If you don't take your vacation, and November rolls around, you HAVE to take the entire month of December off. Some employers are allowed to apply for special dispensation, but the regional government labor board is usually very loathe to grant such dispensations lest they start a trend. In the US, you are lucky if you get 2 weeks paid vacation, and your employer can cancel your vacation on a whim (as has happened to me on several occasions) and you have no government labor board to take your complaint to when this happens. In fact, if you were to take this up with any government entity, they would probably laugh you out of the office, while in Germany, this can be a very serious offense and can end up with the company being sanctioned and having to pay a hefty fine.

      A lot of these practices are used to make working your employees overtime more expensive than it is to actually hire new employee. This makes a lot of sense when you consider that most of Europe is combating a high unemployment rate, and the best way to get to full employment is to create more jobs. That Germany is still near the top in individual worker productivity speaks volumes about German work ethics. They are able to get as much done in a standard 7 hour day/35 hour week as most Americans do in 8 hour day/40 hour week.

      What is also really strange is that the cost to hire a new worker in Germany is not nearly as expensive as it is in the US. For instance, in the US, if you hire on a new full time employee, you have to pay his/her benefits (health, dental), while in Germany, most of these are already covered under the universal health system paid for by the German taxpayers.

      As to the original topic, it stands to reason that the best solution for Apple at this point is to offer a free bumper rim to all their affected customers. If they purchase it in volume, the cost is minimal, and they can tell their customers to go to the nearest Apple Store to pick one up for free. It goes a long way to placating customer relations as well as bringing those customers back into the Apple Store, where, more than likely, these people will also probably purchase one or two additional retail items, so Apple wins all the way around. If they offer it in fruity colors, all the better.

    9. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>Your fault for not keeping copies of your timecards.

      No not my fault. A woman does not deserve to be raped just because she wore a skimpy black dress, and neither did I deserve to be unpaid just because I didn't print my timecard. Don't blame the victim when it is the criminal/corporation that is at fault.

      Besides I couldn't print the cards since no such function existed. (Even the prnt scrn button did nothing.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Corporations are responsible for the actions of their agents while said agents are on the clock. So sorry I'm not buying your "the corporation is innocent" defense.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    11. Re:AppleCare memo on how to mislead users... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Informative
      From Apple's website:

      iPhone Return Policy

      If you are not satisfied with your iPhone purchase, please visit online Order Status or call 1-800-676-2775 to request a return. The iPhone must be returned to our warehouse within 30 calendar days from shipment to avoid an $175 early termination fee. The iPhone must be returned in the original packaging, including any accessories, manuals, and documentation.

      Apple will assess a 10% restocking fee on any opened iPhone. Shipping fees are not refundable.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  4. Secrecy is a double edged sword. by Alcimedes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That must have been a really, really, really awkward conversation.

    Although to be honest, I wonder if this is Apple's secrecy coming to bite them in the ass. If you are uber careful about how many phones you have out in the field, you're a lot less likely to run into scenarios where your product fails in real world situations.

    beta testing, google does it for a reason.

    1. Re:Secrecy is a double edged sword. by hedwards · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because it's too expensive and time consuming to remove the word "beta" from the website?

    2. Re:Secrecy is a double edged sword. by realityimpaired · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're being facetious, but you're probably not that far off the mark... not that it's too expensive to actually remove the word, but because it could be too expensive to remove the word if things go pear-shaped and some corporate entity that's using the service loses all their work/documents. By keeping the word Beta there, they discourage people from relying on it for money-making purposes, and that in turn discourages idiots from trying to sue them when it breaks and they lose a day's pay. And even if somebody is dumb enough to try to sue them over a gmail outage, they can reply "sorry, but it's still in beta testing. That's clearly advertised on the site. It's well known in computing that 'beta' means that it's still in testing and has no guarantee that it'll work 100% of the time, it's your own damned fault you relied on it."

    3. Re:Secrecy is a double edged sword. by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Completely unrelated, but do you realize that even VHS tapes must have gone through beta-testing?

    4. Re:Secrecy is a double edged sword. by ballwall · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, they probably did test, but their testing apparently included a case that looked like the iphone 3gs to hide the fact that someone was out using a new iPhone. I'm wondering if that's why they didn't discover the issue sooner. None of the testers were using bare phones.

    5. Re:Secrecy is a double edged sword. by Dihce · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The reason they didn't detect the issue is because all of their phones where in cases to protect their identity. so yeah, it's definitely biting them in the ass

  5. Alternative antennas by jabberwock · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apple's next product announcement will be for special color-matching paperclips ($9.99) and tin cans ($49.99) as antenna boosters.

    1. Re:Alternative antennas by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Time to enter the market with the Pringles Cantenna for iPhone 4! Only 7.99$ and you get a pile of chips* as a bonus!

      * burned electronics flavour available for a limited time only!

  6. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by Pojut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Specifics? Last time I checked, there is nothing that the iPhone OS can do that Android can't do (and, aside from Android being "open", the reverse is more or less true as well.)

  7. Equal Opportunities? by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...must be left-handed

  8. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by WilyCoder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OP have you ever used an Android phone? The platform is maturing extremely fast. I just switched from an iPhone 3g to an Evo 4g and I don't have regrets. The features of the iPhone 4 just didn't impress me enough. Plus, once I got an android I realized how much the iPhone was stifling my inner geek. I've loaded custom roms, overclocked, rooted, everything...It has been a lot of fun and I recommend android to any geek I know. And if you're not a geek, I still recommend it.

    Ok, I do have ONE regret about my switch: a unified mailbox. There's probably one in the android market...hmmm brb!

  9. Reading into it? by _merlin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone got fired, or they just realised that you can't expect it to work properly if you don't hire experts. Reminds me of all the issues with noise in the G5 towers getting onto the supply rails and then into the audio I/O and Firewire power that lead to them hiring analog electronics experts to fix it. When I first read that the stainless steel surround was an antenna, I predicted these kinds of problems - you can't expect an antenna to maintain tuning while allowing a meatbag to touch it, especially when you need to be able to tune several microwave bands from hundreds of MHz to GHz. The laws of physics are against you, and any engineer should be able to point that out. Other handsets have issues where your hand can obstruct the signal, but the iPhone 4 is unique in allowing you to place things in galvanic contact with the antenna, which has a far bigger effect on its RF performance.

    1. Re:Reading into it? by random+coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So how likely was it that someone in marketing thought it would be "cool design" to have a visible antenna on the outside of the unit?

    2. Re:Reading into it? by CraftyJack · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I first read that the stainless steel surround was an antenna...The laws of physics are against you, and any engineer should be able to point that out.

      Well, now we know the material selection criteria. Laws of physics...or sleek and shiny?

    3. Re:Reading into it? by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean like Steve Jobs? Very likely.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Reading into it? by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have metal around the case to bring the front and back pieces together. Why not make that piece of metal useful?

      Sounds like reasonable engineering to me, except for the fact that it ended up introducing a new problem.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    5. Re:Reading into it? by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because that piece of metal is only useful as an antenna when someone's not grabbing hold of it. Even close counts when it comes to RF (try walking around an FM radio with marginal reception), but grabbing the thing with your hand is going to *wreck* it. Apparently Steve wanted too much for it to look like a Leica camera (whose stainless steel bodies were, surprisingly, *not* doubling as antennas) and too little for it to work in every possible situation (like being held by a sweaty person.)

      This is only reasonable engineering if function follows form. I try not to bash apple, I really do, but in this case it's painfully obvious what they are after when they "engineered" this thing.

    6. Re:Reading into it? by phonewebcam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Correct - hence this turkey known as the i "Phone" 4.
      Another thing that strikes me - didn't they do all the testing with the engineers using components built into 3GS cases, and only switched to the production ones at the last minute? So basically their testing was all about software, and Apples usual paranoia over security wasn't thought through properly.

    7. Re:Reading into it? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How did people make phone calls if their cameras didn't have that functionality?

      They used their mp3 player to make phone calls instead! DUH!

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    8. Re:Reading into it? by stewbee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what. I have designed patch antennas for 1.8 GHz on FR4. Yes the design equations are plug and chug, but on FR-4, the half wavelength of 2 GHz is still about 3 inches. Do really think that there is a spare 3 inches on the back of the iPhone? BTW, 2 GHz is the highest frequency of GSM phones. Typical frequencies are around 900 MHz, which then would be about twice as big as the dimensions stated. Ideally, Apple would like to use something like a patch antenna, since they can just fab it with the PWB. Because the size is prohibitive for the iPhone's requirements, you need to get clever; probably more so than you would find in the ARRL. Again, they can look in other publications in IEEE, but those will not always be plug and chug. If anything, you will see that they simulated some geometry that has some desirable characteristics. It will then be on you do the modeling and simulation yourself.

      Additionally, you hand made your antenna presumably. Apple need to make millions of these antennas. Did you model your antenna for any sort of yield analysis to meet the requirements? I'm again guessing no. Do you think that Apple wants some laborer to tune their antennas for them? Of course not. Variability in antenna elements can have drastic effects on VSWR and Q. It would be the antenna engineers job to take this into account also from the manufacturing tolerances and their effects on the antenna's performance.

      Now there is a chance you are trolling, and I realize this, but things around the 1GHz range and above are not easy to design because circuit approximations are generally no longer valid. If you do read the ARRL books, I think that they make a good point of trying to impart this on their readers. Also note how few projects there are that are above VHF in these books even though amateur bands go to 1.3 GHz.

    9. Re:Reading into it? by newcastlejon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is only reasonable engineering if function follows form. I try not to bash apple, I really do, but in this case it's painfully obvious what they are after when they "engineered" this thing.

      I agree wholeheartedly; design is not engineering. This was a design decision but the RF engineer in charge still didn't shoot down this proposal as soon as it was suggested.

      Industrial design is such a hit-and-miss affair simply because it's the intersection between two very disparate disciplines.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    10. Re:Reading into it? by Facegarden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have metal around the case to bring the front and back pieces together. Why not make that piece of metal useful?

      Sounds like reasonable engineering to me, except for the fact that it ended up introducing a new problem.

      You don't design a billion dollar product based on what "seems reasonable". You design it based on the ideas of the best goddamn engineers you can find, and do exhaustive testing.

      The problem at Apple is that the higher-ups get so entranced in design work that they might push too hard to make their engineers "deal with it". If an engineer told steve jobs "no, you can't do that", Jobs would probably fire him and find and engineer that said he could do it, even if that engineer was either just covering his ass, or was too optimistic.

      And then they required all the testers to have covers on their phones to make it look like an iphone 3G, which masked the meat-to-antenna issue.

      gizmodo posted a good article on the issue yesterday: http://gizmodo.com/5575412/apple-design-vs-apple-engineering

      It is systematic, not accidental.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
  10. Probably not antenna designers' fault by Saishuuheiki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Somehow I doubt it was the idea of an antenna designer to put it on the outside where one would hold it. Anyone with any antenna theory knowledge at all knows that your gain would then be changed easily based on how it was held by a conductor (eg, you)

    The only think you could blame the antenna engineer for is not properly stating what a bad idea it is.
    Heck, it's entirely possible they didn't have any antenna engineers and now realize that's probably idea for a product masquerading as a phone.

    1. Re:Probably not antenna designers' fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I hope they at least compensated for the capacitance of the human hand touching the antenna by using a varicap circuit to tune the antenna. (You use a longer-than-ideal antenna, add capacitance to compensate, then back off the capacitance if you determine that it's too high because somebody is touching the antenna.) I'd expect them to have something like that anyway because it's impossible to build an ideal antenna for such a broad range of frequencies.

      If they have a *software-controlled* varicap, they might be able to fix the entire problem in software by just pushing the capacitance higher when they determine that a human hand is bridging the antennas. So a software update might be possible if they have a good way to test the capacitance on the antenna with the existing hardware (or I suppose they could just watch for a sudden drop in signal strength and try adjusting up, see if it helps, then try adjusting down if it made things worse).

    2. Re:Probably not antenna designers' fault by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only think you could blame the antenna engineer for is not properly stating what a bad idea it is.

      They did. They were ignored because form is more important then function (this is Apple remember). The product then launched. The engineers were then overheard saying "we told you so" in the halls one day. And now there are 3 positions that recently became available.

    3. Re:Probably not antenna designers' fault by mea37 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ". . . based on how it was held by a conductor (eg, you)"

      Huh? I don't stand in front of an orchestra waving my arms around...

    4. Re:Probably not antenna designers' fault by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      (or I suppose they could just watch for a sudden drop in signal strength and try adjusting up, see if it helps, then try adjusting down if it made things worse).

      auto antenna tuners exist. There is no need to guess by trial and error. Simply measuring the antenna current and comparing the phase of the current will tell you the tuning direction needed. When the current is in phase with the voltage, the antenna load is resistive (in tune). When the current leads the voltage, the antenna is capacitive and needs less capacitance (tuned higher in frequency) and vise versa.

      Unfortunately, auto tuners for microwave frequencies are difficult to design due to the very short mechanical dimensions of the parts. Voltage tuned capacitors (diodes) are common in VHF and UHF, but not as common in microwave applications for tuning antennas due to their limited tuning range. A hand contacting a microwave antenna can tune it much further than the corrective auto tunning can correct it in most applications. Even if tuned to resonance, the new tuning to correct for the hand contact will still not have the impedance change corrected. Energy absorbed by microwave heating of the hand is energy not received or transmitted by the phone. Tuning is only part of the problem.

      Attenuation is a real problem at these frequencies. To demonstrate this, simply tape an orange near the LNB in a satellite antenna in the path of the feedhorn. Without de-tuning the feedhorn cavity, the huge loss in signal strength by absorption can be seen as a total loss of reception. Try placing your hand over the feedhorn while setting up your satellite TV dish. Active retuning of the feedhorn to resonance won't fix the total loss of the signal.

      HF for Ham radio and marine shortwave (2-30 MHZ) need larger components to tune mechanically larger antennas so those applications use mechanical relays to switch capacitors and inductors or motor driven capacitors and/or inductors.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  11. Better than asking an interview question by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Funny

    So candidate "X": how would you deal with RF absorbtion and detuning of a microwave antenna when brought into close proximity of a human body?
    < candidate answers, based on practical experience >
    Interviewer writes down answer, says "That's very interesting, next candidate please"

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Better than asking an interview question by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  12. From the job listing: by genka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hands on experience is required

  13. Re:Would this be considered... by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...Putting the horse behind the cart?

    It's a perfectly good solution if you're headed downhill.

  14. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by hedwards · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Depends which phone you've got. The Nexus One has a great interface and an ever growing list of available software. Plus since Google doesn't banish software from the market for duplicating functionality or allowing people to see naughty things, you can customize things quite a bit more if the interface isn't to your liking.

  15. Just give it a different name by drewhk · · Score: 4, Funny

    iPhone noTouch

    1. Re:Just give it a different name by Trevelyan · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean:

      iPhone !Touch

  16. Good RF Engineers are expensive and rare by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most companies have a hard time recruiting any good RF engineering. It's not a 'digital' domain and the Educational System just plain isn't putting out many (any?) good RF engineers anymore. It isn't even something you can passably fake with 'SPICE' like some of the lower-frequency analog.

    I doubt if Apple can afford that kind of engineering. They can't even afford mechanical engineers with the skill-set to design a robust replaceable-battery-compartment into their products. (the most recent attempt I can remember is the battery compartment in the Newton, and almost every Newton I have ever seen has a broken battery compartment)

    1. Re:Good RF Engineers are expensive and rare by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt if Apple can afford that kind of engineering.

      Tens of billions of dollars of cash-on-hand and they can't afford a few engineers with six-figure salaries. Sure.

    2. Re:Good RF Engineers are expensive and rare by Elbowgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I recently found out why Apple may have decided to eschew replaceable batteries. It makes the case so much more robust to have as few connection points as possible; in my case I left my iPhone on the roof of a car and it flew off whilst the car was going full speed. Luckily someone found it and I got it back with only one or two recognizable scratches.

      However if this had had a battery compartment I can guarantee that it would have been a mess.

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  17. Prototype fail by damnfuct · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds like they didn't have this problem while they were testing them in cases that look like iPhone 3s. Maybe apple will start shipping them with iPhone 3 cases?

  18. Re:Messed up links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    A new meme was born and they saw it was good.

  19. Re:Bumpers by trapnest · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They did the testing with the iPhone 4 inside an iPhone 3GS case... so no one would know what it was.

  20. Different Job Titles Needed by Tisha_AH · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clearly the marketing department is the end-all, be-all decision makers in a product design at Apple. As an RF engineer (I am) I would not be jumping up and down to work for Apple. Antenna designs are always a compromise between aesthetics and performance.

    I bet that the Apple phone worked just great in their corporate offices with an AT&T cell site right next door. The signal levels would be very high and you probably could have wrapped the phone in a 10 pound ham and the signal would have looked just great. I doubt that they did any real-world testing in a weak signal environment.

    Much of the weak-signal specifications for any RF device are usually determined on a test bench or in an anechoic chamber where conditions are controlled. The ugly reality of someone's sweaty, meaty hand seldom makes it into the engineers lexicon.

    The job titles for these folks should be "Fall Guy #1, Fall Guy #2 and Fall Guy #3.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  21. Yes... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    a fanboi would probably suggest sucking Steve Jobs' dick as a solution.

    I tried that when my new phone starting dropping calls, but he kept telling me "not to hold it that way."


    ...
    Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week. Tip your waitress, try the veal.

  22. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Specifics? Last time I checked, there is nothing that the iPhone OS can do that Android can't do (and, aside from Android being "open", the reverse is more or less true as well.)

    Does it have [extremely specific game X]? Does it have [extremely specific game Y]? Does it have [extremely specific game Z]? Does it sync with [designed-for-vendor lockin media player A]? No? That sounds pretty useless to me! What do you EXPECT me to do on these phones, anyway?

  23. Hammertime! by Urza9814 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now all Apple needs to do is make a commercial with MC Hammer.

    "Can't touch this!"

    Best part is, they could use the same video - it's already people dancing in front of a white background. Just crank up the contrast until the people turn into silhouettes, and add some headphones.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c4L4CPfQY8

  24. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someday somebody has to explain to me this phenomenon of these alleged 'dropped calls'. Thing is, I'm in Europe (traveling all about it as part of my job) and I have never (read that again: never) had a dropped call. Not in busy metropolitan area's and not in the rural sticks either.

    So what's the deal with GSM in the US? Not enough cell towers? Users walking in and out Faraday cages? What?

    Years ago (a decade or more) it used to be that your calls got broken off when entering a tunnel or somesuch. That was annoying so it got fixed.

    Maybe it's the healthy dose of competition between carriers overhere?

  25. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by Pojut · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do you EXPECT me to do on these phones, anyway?

    I expect you to DIE, Mr. Bond.

  26. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by bemymonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    The iPhone is just smoother. Just last Friday evening I got the chance to compare an iPhone 3GS to my Motorola Milestone (overclocked to 800MHz and tweaked for speed and stability) and an HTC Desire (more or less stock, as far as I could tell)... even with Launcher Pro and Sense UI on the Milestone and Desire, respectively, the iPhone just felt... nicer.

    The scrolling, pinching, app-switching animations, hell, even the lockscreens... all smoother and more responsive on the iPhone.

    Of course, that's not important to everyone (definitlely won't be swaying me any time soon), but many people will go with the iPhone on this basis alone, because they assume it signifies that everything else about the iPhone will be better as well...

  27. Re:Bumpers by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My guess is they did testing in an RF chamber. They never had anyone hold the phone during testing and then they put test phones in cases as a disguise.
    They just never did a valid real world test. More than one company has made that mistake. What is so funny is how everybody now is going duh...

    A good guess, actually, because when you're doing FCC testing, you pretty much use an instrumented RF chamber to gather field data. You can't have people in it for obvious reasons.

    Even in real world testing, you might not find it - after all, once this hit, people have tried to replicate the result, failed, then watched a dozen YouTube videos seeing how to replicate it. After seeing them, they have to purposely set their hands in one position. Other people, trying to see the effect, have dropped their phones. It really depends how you hold the phone - some people like ot hold the bottom and use leverage to hold it to their ear (results in problem - you have to "cup" the bottom), others hold the top and press their hands to their ear. The latter, except for those with the right hand geometry, probably can't figure out how to do it.

    Hell, I've seen phones where the radio locks up if you do *just* the right set of motions. One of my coworkers spent a week riding the commuter train with a phone, laptop, and debug hardware because that was the only reliable way to reproduce the issue. And you have 5 minutes because it happens in just one particular part, then you get off and have to ride it the other way to set up for the next round of debugging.

    For phone testing, there's tons of issues a limited testing won't find. The only way you'll find them is well, release it to the public

  28. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Plus, once I got an android I realized how much the iPhone was stifling my inner geek. I've loaded custom roms, overclocked, rooted, everything..

    so you just did not even try this on the iPhone? You have been able to do ALL of these for longer than andriod phones have existed.

    Dont make crap up like you cant do this on an Iphone, Jailbrake and root an iphone for some serious fun... Hell one dude has Linux running on the iphone. http://linuxoniphone.blogspot.com/

    http://www.appletell.com/apple/comment/overclock-your-jailbroken-iphone-or-ipod-touch/

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  29. I hope the engineers didn't fall on their sword by Tobyb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Disclaimer: I am an engineer (electrical test, in fact) so I'm a bit biased. But from the brief insights that we can get about the Apple development process, Jobs loves to keep different parts of the organization completely oblivious from each other. My guess is that the actual antenna engineers never had knowledge of the final design of the phone. The process guys designing the machining to make the external antenna probably didn't know they were making antennas. The only people that probably knew the whole picture was Jobs, Ive, and the usual group that is in that iPhone 4 video shown during the keynote.

    If statistically it is shown to be a huge problem as such to trigger a recall, the board should do its job and hold one someone in this high level team responsible. Obviously, it is a cultural thing with Jobs. He loves to get feedback of what is possible from the engineering staff and then ignore it. For example, the Mac Mini. He famously asked what was the smallest computer they could build at the time. He got feedback and then said make it 1" smaller in each dimension. Sometimes it works. I have done some of my best work for people who were similar, just unflinching in their demands. It is gratifying to complete such a project. However, this time taking industrial design over engineering backfired, and big time. Apple has been inching towards this day for a long time. For example, why no strain relief on the old Macbook MagSafe connectors? Aluminum backs on the original iPhone? I'm hopeful that this episode shakes up the culture and process a little bit. Enough to be cautious when necessary, but not to stifle their crazy industrial design creativity either.

  30. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by Pojut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The primary difference is that you don't have to give up your warranty to do it on Android.

    We already had this discussion here, folks...don't use "just hack the device" as support for an iPhone when you can do the same thing with an unmodified Android device. I'm all for modifying my gadgets, but not when I can buy a gadget that does what I want right out of the box.

  31. They're not the only ones by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BP is now hiring drilling engineers. There's never enough money to do it right the first time but there's always money to try to fix it the second time.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  32. Re:The funny part is, it's still better than Andro by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, I do have ONE regret about my switch: a unified mailbox. There's probably one in the android market...hmmm brb!

    If you find one, let me know. I am a long time BlackBerry user, and would love an Android phone but it's just not as tightly wound as the BB platform is, especially with the messaging boxes as you said. I love the ability to click "messages" and see anything that's gone on from IM to calls to emails, in one list. A phone needs to save me time first, and be a cool gadget second.

  33. That's my bet by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They probably didn't bother with any engineers for it. I would guess that in their phones they normally use off-the-shelf antenna designs. So I could see that they have no need for an engineering department. Also, when it comes to antennas for cell signals, there are some pretty well established designs/rules to use.

    So my bet is that the marketers started going wild. They figured it'd look at really cool if the phone was all glass, thin, with the antenna as a metal band running around it. That layout for antenna was generally ok, so a prototype was built. It was tested sitting on a desk, and worked fine. Things moved forward. However all testing was done in non-real circumstances, either sitting on a bench in a lab or using disguised prototypes, that didn't have the same structure as the final thing. Everything looked good, product launched, shit hit the fan.

    At no time was an actual engineer in this area consulted.

    I would say this is the most likely scenario. Not that there was some dumbass engineer that didn't know or whatever, but that there was NO engineer, that nobody with antenna design expertise was ever consulted. It was done because it looked cool, without proper thought given to all the functional constraints. A marketing decision, not an engineering one. Now, given the problems, they are hiring engineers to try and keep it from happening again.

    1. Re:That's my bet by dzfoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you even check the AnandTech article? The antenna still works with the user holding the device. Like many other devices, attenuation occurs when the antenna is covered, especially when in contact with the human body. This attenuation is mitigated by the fact that signal quality is improved even at the lowest signal strengths. However, it is significant enough to cause disruption if the user is in an area with a weak signal already.

      As the AnandTech tests show, part of the problem is in the way that the signal strength is reported by the "bars" meter, a weak signal around 40% of the maximum supported still shows up as "5 bars". When attenuated by touching the antenna in the right place this gives the illusion of a drop from full strength (5 bars) to none, which seems more dramatic than it really is.

      The attenuation is marked, there is no argument about that. However, even AnandTech suggests that coating the antenna with an insulative should help mitigate it even more. In other words, it seems to be a sound design, based on solid engineering, with perhaps some implementation flaws due to the rush to market.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  34. cheap buggers by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering with subscription your iPhone costs like 7-800$ and that you can buy a rubber "bumper" case on ebay from china for like 1$ or 2$ bucks, you would think they would be just throwing those things at customers!

    Of course they probably would view this as conceding that a problem actually exists...

  35. In the interview.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    INTERVIEWER: "So you want the Antenna Engineer position?"
    GUY: "Yes."
    INTERVIEWER: "And you've heard what Stave jobs had to day on the subject?"
    GUY: "That people with problems shouldn't hold their phone that way?"
    INTERVIEWER: [winces] "Yeah, that. He didn't put it exactly that way. What -- what do you think about Mr. Jobs' response?"
    GUY: "I don't agree."
    INTERVIEWER: "What?"
    GUY: "...with the, um, consumers who think that idea isn't correct." [smiles]
    INTERVIEWER: "And what do you think would fix the problem?"
    GUY: "I would show people the correct way to hold the phone?"
    INTERVIEWER: [scribbles note on clipboard] "Thank you. You'll be hearing from us."
    GUY LEAVES
    INTERVIEWER: [picks up iPhone and dials] "Damn it" [adjusts grip] "This is Steve. We've interviewed one hundred engineers and ninety of them agree with Steve. Print the ad."

  36. Re:Bumpers by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Funny

    Less of a guess than from experience doing a little testing myself.
    Sometimes people do the unexpected.
    A software example happened to my company many years ago.
    This was back in the DOS days.
    Our software had a file manager. There was a function to copy the file to the floppy and from the floppy.
    We where getting complaints that files where "unediting" themselves. This was actually impossible with the file structure we where using. We zeroed out the free sections of the file to help prevent curruption.
    Well the keyboard commands where crtl f crtl f to copy from the floppy and ctrl f ctrl t to copy to the foppy.
    We finally figured out that some people thought that they had to hit the ctrl f and t all at the same time.
    They where holding the f down long enough for the auto repeat to cause them to copy from the floppy and they never noticed the message.
    We "fixed" the issue by changing the hot keys in later versions and by adding a lot more warnings if you tried to copy an old file over a new file.
    Just figuring out what caused the unediting was a challenge since the support was all phone based.
    It is hard to make things easy.
     

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  37. Re:Bumpers by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jobs said let there be the iPhone 4 and there was the iPhone 4 and Jobs saw the iPhone 4 and said it was good. Then he sent them forth to multiply.

    But he never actually held it and made a call with it. That was the problem.

  38. Re:Clearly you're not an expert. by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 2, Informative
    You need to take the same advice. You don't know enough about this to speak intelligently. Contrast your passionate, but not particularly insightful analysis, with this dispassionate analysis, informed by education, experience, and oh, dear, actual testing

    Brian Klug and Anand Lal Shimpi on iPhone 4 antenna

    "With my bumper case on, I made it further into dead zones than ever before, and into marginal areas that would always drop calls without any problems at all. It's amazing really to experience the difference in sensitivity the iPhone 4 brings compared to the 3GS, and issues from holding the phone aside, reception is absolutely definitely improved. I felt like I was going places no iPhone had ever gone before. There's no doubt in my mind this iPhone gets the best cellular reception yet, even though measured signal is lower than the 3GS."

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  39. Look, I'm not keen on Apple's policy myself, but by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We already had this discussion here, folks...don't use "just hack the device" as support for an iPhone when you can do the same thing with an unmodified Android device. I'm all for modifying my gadgets, but not when I can buy a gadget that does what I want right out of the box.

    Quite clearly, the Android DIDN'T do what the GP want right out of the box, as evidenced by the overclocking, rooting, loading custom roms, etc. This is neither a hit against Android nor iPhone - practically every device needs some degree of customization to make it fit a particular user's needs.

    I'm not sure where you're coming from on the jailbreaking-terminates-your-warranty thing either. The sequence of events goes like this: 1) jailbreak 2) discover problems 3) restore to factory settings 4) get warranty service 5) jailbreak again.

    I agree that Apple's control freakery over the iPhone is a bad thing. But you certainly can achieve all the same geeky stuff on an iPhone that you can on Android, which requires only a jailbreak, and that's really not that hard.

  40. Re:Would this be considered... by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not if your cart has brakes. I mean, give the poor horse a break!