Slashdot Mirror


Price Shocks May Be Coming For Helium Supply

Ars has an update on the potential helium shortage we discussed a couple of years back. A Nobel laureate, Robert Richardson, argues for ending market distortions that are resulting in an artificially low price for helium, which is accelerating the projected exhaustion of the supply. "Richardson's solution is to rework the management of the Bush Dome [so named for reasons that have nothing to do with the politician] stockpile once again, this time with the aim of ensuring that helium's price rises to reflect its scarcity. In practical terms, he said that it would be better to deal with a 20-fold increase in price now than to deal with it increasing by a factor of thousands in a few decades when supply issues start to become critical. But he also made an emotional appeal, stating, 'One generation doesn't have the right to determine the availability forever.'"

26 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. No Problem by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 4, Funny

    This isn't an issue... all we need to do is send some blimps up to collect all of the balloons that kids accidentally let fly away.

    1. Re:No Problem by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Funny

      All we need to do is make nuclear fusion work.

      This is why this is a non-story. I have it from a very reliable source that practical nuclear fusion is only 20 years away. I spoke to my father and grandfather, and they assured me that this estimate was time-tested, and therefore, reliable.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  2. Re:I can't wait... by TruthSauce · · Score: 5, Informative

    Supply and demand are a short-term adjustment, not a long term one.

    There is absolutely nothing (other than perhaps some sort of "speculative warehousing" schemes) that would allow supply-and-demand adjust to prevent the depletion of a non-renewable resource.

    Helium, for example, is priced based on how easy and cheap it is to extract it from the ground immediately, right now, rather than on what its real time-value is when considering the value of potential important industrial, medical and scientific usage 100 years from now when the stuff will be impossible to obtain, because too many people stuffed it into party balloons and party favours and a billion other random uses today.

  3. "One generation doesn't have the right to..." by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One generation doesn't have the right to determine the availability forever.

    Like property rights, why should land only be able to be sold by those who got to it first (or bought it from those who did) - I wasn't able to compete with them and doesn't seem fair that my ancestors lack of ability to "win" should deprive me.

    And the same thing for all the minerals that have already been mined from the earth. And in fact, every single thing on the entire planet, ever.

  4. Someone owns stocks in major helium producers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While on the train ride back from Germany, I read a headline in the Financial Times.

    "Mineral Prices Depress as Fear Dissipates"

    It was spot on. I was involved over the last year in a major project for the Dutch government on the topic of mineral scarcity. After a year of intensive research I came to the conclusion that the mineral scarcity situation was effectively the inability of manufacturers and managers to effectively communicate their material requirements. There is really no absolute scarcity on the planet. We've tapped less than 2% of the resource base on the planet. Unless we suddenly run out of energy, prompting us to slow down extraction of these minerals, it is unlikely we'll ever really be faced with a shortage.

    Needless to say, such analytical conclusions are not popular these days, we'd much rather claim there really is a scarcity situation as that would give the government something to do. Not a shock that the results of my study were warped, rewritten and omitted. In the end there was no science left in the report presented to the Dutch government. Just another fear piece, much like this one, which temporariliy increases the price of a resource so a few greedy bastards can make a buck while legitimate manufacturers get screwed with a major artificial spike in price.

    1. Re:Someone owns stocks in major helium producers by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way to reduce mineral scarcity, eliminate the psychopaths who consume resources beyond all reason, no more mega yachts, mansions, private jets et al. the planet can no longer cope with them.

      Wrong. The best way is to develop the world as fast as humanly possible. Why? Because the more resources people consume, the less children they have. If population growth is our enemy, then our friend is economic growth. This is happening in a big way in places like India, which previously was a huge pop growth center. It is still growing, but it is down from 6 births per woman to 2.75 per woman. Why? not because of environmentalism, government or anything. It is because of consumerism and capitalism. Why? because women decided that they'd rather have cars then kids. What this means is that if we build, build, build, we end up with less people total. If we conserve and become poorer, more people will be born, and we will end up with a overpopulation catastrophe. Oh, and the mega yachts etc. of the ultra rich aren't the main resource users. It's average people in developed countries. It doesn't really matter though, because we haven't used all that much of the earth's metals.

      not only from mining but also from refining (which becomes much worse as you deal with less viable mining resources).

      Wrong again, rtb61. A mine in a poorer country that dumps toxic waste into a river is bad news. A modern mine, with all it's emission controls and neutralization processes is not. You really have to understand the difference between an open coal fire and highly emissions controlled one.

      The world contains more than enough metal for all the stuff the enviros love to hate. More energy then we could ever find a way to use hits the earth from the sun. However, we need to actually use it. Then all 15 billion of us can live in mansions, and drive flying SUVs. The real psychopaths are people like you who wish to deny people the right to live their lives to fullest. The best way to reduce mineral scarcity (and this is proven over and over) is to allow entrepreneurs and capitalists to find new methods of mining, recycling, and substitution of materials, and sue them if they dump acid down the drain.

      --
      Responsibility is an addiction
      Virtue is a temptation
      Community is a cartel
    2. Re:Someone owns stocks in major helium producers by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Insightful MY ASS.

      Prices rises, lower concentrations become economically viable, util we use all the fucking Earth crust.

      This is just a STUPID rant with the all too common "blame the rich". Way more resources are used keeping stupid people like you viable than keeping my humble pleasure boat.

      There aren't enough yacht-owning rich to account for all the resource usage on this planet. Hell, one of the biggest uses of electric power in the U.S. is residential refrigeration ... let's blame the rich for that.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Someone owns stocks in major helium producers by haruchai · · Score: 5, Funny

      You named your ass Insightful? Or is it really the source of your insight? That would explain many of the Anonymous Coward postings I've seen
      over the years.

      "Ladies & Germs, I'd like to introduce Insightful, my ass"

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    4. Re:Someone owns stocks in major helium producers by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The best way to reduce mineral scarcity, eliminate the psychopaths who consume resources beyond all reason, no more mega yachts, mansions, private jets et al. the planet can no longer cope with them."

      Nice rage, but the above listed uses consume a trivial amount of resources compared to more mundane but widespread consumption.

      "the rest of us the majority still should consider all future generations of humanity in the way we use and abuse our mutual resources, not just the next but thousands of years even hundreds of thousands of years into the future."

      Precisely why should we do this?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Someone owns stocks in major helium producers by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Normal minerals don't go anywhere after you use them, they either remain in circulation or end up in a landfill, which we'll eventually mine for resources later. Helium rises through the troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere.. until the solar wind or a photon, random collisions gives it enough velocity to bounce off into space, never to return.

      It's critical to at least attempt to recover helium since we don't really have it in abundance (like hydrogen, locked as it is in the oceans) and it can so easily be lost forever. At the very least, we should try to keep the annual consumption of helium below the annual production, and I don't mean the rate at which we pull it out of the ground, but the rate at which it forms naturally as a decay product of minerals throughout the earth's crust.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Someone owns stocks in major helium producers by cowtamer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then all 15 billion of us can live in mansions, and drive flying SUVs. The real psychopaths are people like you who wish to deny people the right to live their lives to fullest.

      I venture to guess that you haven't traveled much. It's easy to rail against environmentalism when

      1) You have your own SUV to think about

      2) You live in a country with abundant natural resources, trees, land, and relatively low population per area

      3) Environmental destruction is an abstract concept that only "left wing wackos" and people who want to take away your "right to consume" rail on about...

      4) You consume (or produce) commercially sponsored news/research/propaganda

      Visit a developing country sometime. You will quickly observe that:

      1) Not even the rich can afford single story houses, let alone mansions because of land scarcity

      2) Even a tiny fraction of the population driving causes unbelievable amounts of traffic and pollution (you will feel this with your own lungs -- not just read about it)

      3) Environmental destruction is effectively permanent (even if some of the ruined pieces or nature theoretically _could_ recover if they had not been covered by apartment blocks, sidewalks, ware houses, or toxic sludge).

      4) People do not ever _debate_ whether environmental destruction is bad. They generally find themselves powerless reverse it once it has happened (e.g., it's a LOT easier to keep an existing forest alive rather than try to grow a new one once you've lost all your topsoil and rainfall due to widespread deforestation).

      I'm no saint. I own an SUV. I commute. I take international flights. I drink bottled water.

      But there's a HUGE difference between not living up to your values and actually BELIEVING that what you do would be good policy if everyone else on the planet did it. The latter may make you feel good, but leads to the election of decision makers who create policies that are far more harmful than the actions (good or bad) of a single individual.

  5. Health care impact by adamwpants · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in respiratory care. We administer a 70%/30% mix of helium and oxygen, called Heliox. It is a low-density gas, making it easier to breathe for people with airway obstructions (such as asthma, throat cancer, etc.).

    The rising cost of helium may make Heliox prohibitively expensive.

    Just wanted to share that helium is for more than balloons.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Health care impact by turing_m · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The rising cost of helium may make Heliox prohibitively expensive.

      Only if you don't recover it. At some price for helium, sucking the exhalations into a compressor, bottling it and selling it back to the gas company for reprocessing becomes cost effective. I don't imagine that recovering the helium would be difficult given the difference in densities between helium and other gases.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    2. Re:Health care impact by imsabbel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Any real use of helium for cryogenics is usually combined with helium recapturing lines. It would be _insane_ to let it go up into the air, even at todays prices.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Health care impact by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 4, Informative

      Newer ones are being based on MgB2 and liquid hydrogen.

      --
      Responsibility is an addiction
      Virtue is a temptation
      Community is a cartel
  6. Do you hear that? by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's as if a million chipmunk voices suddenly cried out in terror and turned into baritones.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  7. Re:Lets mine the Moon! by countertrolling · · Score: 5, Funny

    The moon? There's lots more in the sun. Just stick a big straw into it and drain it out. Just don't let BP do it. They'll blow out a big hole and the thing will fly off like a balloon.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  8. Re:Lets mine the Moon! by swb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mom, why is dad such a boring, sanctimonious pain in the ass?

  9. Re:emotional appeal? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    There certainly is a moral element; but helium is a very special case, virtually unique among the elements of human relevance.

    Once it hits the atmosphere, it is inert enough not to combine with anything and light enough to diffuse into space. Game over. No mining the garbage dumps for this one. The only "recycling" that occurs is that in the sense that, if a piece of hardware hasn't been breached, you can remove the helium it contains before decommissioning it.

    The only earthly source of the stuff is assorted alpha-emitting radioactives, since an alpha particle is just a helium nucleus in need of electrons. Very slow. The only viable sources are places where it has had millions of years to be trapped underground, often with natural gas deposits. Once those are tapped out, we wait until some more alpha emitters decay.

    Helium also has some unique properties. There are other inert gasses(nitrogen is inert enough for many purposes, argon is even more so and doesn't float into space), there are other lift gasses(hydrogen, hot air); but if you want very cold fluids, liquid helium is it. Game over. Nothing better available. Hope you guys can figure out high-temp superconductors that don't quench at trivial magnetic field strengths before you run out...

    Virtually every other element or chemical of which we might "run out" we actually mean "run out of really inexpensive supplies". They also tend to be recyclable(in the case of elements and some chemicals) or synthesizable(if you have the energy), and they stay within our gravity well pretty much no matter what you do.

  10. Re:the coming century by fotbr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why is that?

    I live in redneckland. It sucks at times and is great at others. But maybe I can give you some insight as a result.

    1) Often, "intelligently and prudently" comes across as very condescending, and that doesn't sit well with most people, regardless of their intelligence or social status.

    2) People around here have a very high distrust of anyone that doesn't believe the same as them. Yes, that means religion, and their belief that anyone who isn't their particular variety of christian is automatically "wrong" in some manner. Add to that the fact that most people haven't ever lived far from where they grew up, and a distrust of most "big city folk", and a paranoia of those from either the east or west coasts.

    3) Most of the things you mention aren't an issue around here, so there's also a big case of "out of sight out of mind". Fishing? That's a way to spend the afternoon drinking beer; not a way of life (though some of the bass fishermen would call those fightin' words). Aquifer depletion? Not a huge deal here (yet). Oil? Again, not produced here, and no one will care until it all goes away.

    4) Things that work in the more densely populated area simply won't work here. Small commuter cars are great in cities and suburbs. A better system of public transit and light rail would be completely awesome to have. But they really don't work out in the rural areas. So various proposals that have been made regarding high taxes on gas, or on "gas guzzlers" (specifically light trucks), are seen as directly and unfairly targeting them.

    5) Incomes out here are very low compared to the coasts. So while people in Boston or LA may not think much of something that might cost an extra $1000 / year per family, people out here often cannot afford it. When a family of 4 are barely getting by on an income under $30k before taxes are taken out, ANY increase is difficult. Being told "it's worth it" by someone out east making 6 figures, with no kids, and a wife/husband/partner who ALSO makes a nearly 6 figure salary, doesn't go over very well.

    6) Lastly, when they try to make any of these points, they're often dismissed with little thought because they often don't come across as terribly educated. So when they find anyone willing to listen, they can be fiercely loyal.

    I'm not saying any of these make people around here right (indeed, I often disagree with them on just about everything), just trying to explain part of what's going on.

  11. Facts by DCFusor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most helium is released from nat gas flares in oil wells, as at current prices it's not worth recovering either if the well is far from concentrated "civilization". And as the parent mentions, that's it, it's lost. Yes, you can make helium with fusion, and I even do it here, but in amounts that make a microgram look like large lots. Lemme know when a fusion reactor makes energy gain -- I'm working it, but....not yet. www.coultersmithing.com has some info there. Helium 3 is in far shorter supply (always, but now it's really critical) and it is because the DHS has taken it all for portal neutron detectors -- you can't buy it as a civilian (or the detectors new) for ANY price whatever. Sometimes can find it in a used detector, that's about it, and CERN is crying because they need that for their superfluid He dilution coolers. This is a separate but also important issue -- 3He is a decay product from Tritium mostly and we just don't do much of that anymore. There's only a tiny amount in natural He, which of course we're just letting whiz into space because we don't want to pay the rent to store the stuff.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  12. Re:I can't wait... by mysidia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you forgetting that this entire situation is due to government meddling, as in government buying helium for one price, building a massive reserve, and then selling it for a much lower (ridiculously low) price, totally independent of any demand or worth of the product?

  13. Re:I can't wait... by slack_justyb · · Score: 5, Informative

    because too many people stuffed it into party balloons and party favours and a billion other random uses today.

    Okay I've grown really tired of this argument. The Helium that is used in balloons and blimps accounts for an incredibly small amount of the total use. The most single use of Helium is as a coolant. The largest group of uses is as a purging gas or artificial atmosphere (like in arc wielding, silicon mfg., etc...) Just those two together account for 75% of all uses.

    Second, Helium is under constant resupply here on Earth, pretty much all helium on Earth today is the radioactive decay of heavy metals in the interior of the Earth.

    I understand where people are coming from when they warn of this kind of stuff, but LONG term this stuff resupplies at a pretty decent rate. Hence the reason He is the second most abundant element in the universe. Fine, rise the price, but don't blame it on the balloons.

  14. Re:I can't wait... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Informative

    I understand where people are coming from when they warn of this kind of stuff, but LONG term this stuff resupplies at a pretty decent rate. Hence the reason He is the second most abundant element in the universe.

    The actual reason He is the second most abundant element in the universe is that huge amounts of it were formed in the first moments of the Big Bang. A little more has been formed since then by fusion in stars. Unfortunately, essentially none of the helium from either of those sources has stayed put on earth. It all floated away long ago.

    Helium created by decay of heavy elements in incredibly rare in the universe, and it's rare on the earth as well, but it's the only helium we can get at. It forms at a rate that's way too low and too diluted for us to use. It has accumulated over millions of years in the same geological structures that capture natural gas, but those special traps certainly aren't being replenished fast enough for our needs.

  15. Re:I can't wait... by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a reason that helium deposits are often associated with natural gas deposits. They both take a *long* time under a non-porus rock to accumulate to anywhere near useful levels. Like.. geologic time.

    If you think you're just going to get a ton of granite and stick it under a tarp for a few days, you're way, way off base.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  16. Re:I can't wait... by KarmaKhameleon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps you could get every natural gas producer in the county to STOP THROWING IT AWAY.

    They used to capture it and re-sell it. But when the govt got out of the helium business and liquidated their supply in Texas, the nat.-gas folks just started discharging it (it doesn't burn, so they strip it off the supply). It's been about 2 decades since they stopped capturing it. Now STFU about these stupid articles that haven't the faintest clue what they're talking about.

    Raise prices - jeezus fucking christ - you have no idea what's even going on in the supply chain and you want to enforce price controls...fucking morons.