Slashdot Mirror


Working Toward a Universal Power Brick For Laptops

An anonymous reader links to PC Authority with some hopeful news about untangling a persistent annoyance for laptop users — namely, the myriad power supplies called for by laptop makers: "'On a PC, an ATX power supply for example will screw into certain mounting holes, have a maximum size and shape, and will take a standard 3-pin "kettle cord" for incoming power. If it complies with these standards, the PSU will be able to bolt into any manufacturer's ATX case.' Laptop design, on the other hand, involves cramming a PC into a tiny chassis, which usually has its own thermal design and power distribution requirements. This has led to the somewhat bizarre situation where every manufacturer has its own laptop power supply design. It now appears that some of the major players in laptops are getting together to work on a standardized laptop power supply design. Not only are big players involved, but the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) has created a team to work on the power supply standard."

59 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. good. by B5_geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its about fracking time.

    Hey industry (Sony I am looking at you) repeat after me:

    Open standards help EVERYBODY!

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:good. by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's what we said about 20 years ago when we imagined the "connector of the future", which would allow you to drop the serial, parallel, centronic and other various connectors for a single one. A single connector for your keyboard, mouse, printer, scanner, external drives, etc.

      And then USB appeared. No longer did we have to mess with dozens of types of connectors! We only have to care about USB, USB3, FireWire400, FireWire800, eSATA, VGA, DVI, HDMI, DisplayPo... oh wait.

    2. Re:good. by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      USB3 is backward compatible with USB/USB2. USB failed to keep up with storage medium speeds, necessitating eSATA. USB was never intended to replace display connections.

      So nice try at painting USB as a failure, it really isn't. Thanks to USB you no longer have 2x PS2, 2x COM and 1x Parallel ports wasting space on your motherboard. Instead you have 6x USB, 2x Ethernet, and other smaller and much more useful ports to play with.

      But I'm sure someone could dig you up a motherboard that has all those clunky old ports on them, since clearly USB did nothing at all to help.

    3. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 5, Informative

      USB1,2,3 are pretty compatible. In one way only for USB3, but not totally different.

      FW400,800 are also compatible enough.

      eSATA is probably more of a niche product. Probably no one has this on their must-have!!1! list. It's marginally faster than USB2 for external drives only and few drives can steadily saturate a USB2 link at all. Until I'm not saying 480Mbps are enough for everyone, but enough to stop caring *that* much until SSDs become cheap enough to be an external commodity drive.

      VGA is simply kept in a zombie state by ignorant users and overcautious companies. Use cases are respectively "I don't see any difference between analog and digital video and that VGA-only TFT was 0,10 EUR cheaper" and "My laptop must work with the most ancient projectors, the most ancient of cabling and the most ancient of users. Therefore VGA is a must".

      DVI and HDMI are interchangeabled with an adapter available at 1000 eBay shops for less than 5 EUR incl. shipping. They're still gold plated, though.

      DisplayPort are electrically incompatible to DVI and HDMI, but no one notices, since the video cards adapt to it. Apple fans will probably mod me down to hell, but DisplayPort is the reinvention of the wheel. A sleek and stylish wheel of course, and we totally, absolutely needed another connector for digital video that is electrically incompatible with DVI and HDMI. Since we only had 2 digital video standards to choose from. Maybe one of our Appolytes can enlighten me, but to me, it has no substantial advantages over HDMI.

      Looking at the rest of the connectors on this Thinkpad, I spot 1 probably required Gb Ethernet port, 1 zombie Modem port that, since 3G internet, is probably never be used or needed again and 2 analog audio connectors in and out, that are as of yet indispensable.

      Ethernet will probably survive for several decades, since no one will want to replace all those hectoparsecs of wiring or carry around a USB-Ethernet dongle. Paranoid companies will not switch to even terabit WiFi, ever, since it's all so terribly insecure even with 16kB long keys.

      VGA will die in methusalem companies out 1 decade AFTER Internet Explorer 6. Since, you know, you could on one day meet the first data projector ever built and must connect to it lest the company be damned.

      FireWire is dying. Zealots are drawing their knives now, but it adds nothing to USB2 or 3.

      Same for eSATA.

      DisplayPort, Mini-DisplayPort, Micro-DisplayPort and DisplayPort9000 will probably survive with Apple hardware because of reason no. 1337.

      HTC, Apple or Sony could go on to invent anther standard for micro-, mini- and pico-USB, And micro-, mini- and pico-HDMI, maybe each in two versions called A and B.

      The MAFIAA will come up with a new copy protection scheme and cabling somewhere in the next decade, but that cannot stop the unification wave. They have HDMI with Gigabit Ethernet now, which is probably more versatile than sliced bread, but it still will have to compete with USB video.

      But in the end, the future has fewer connectors. One for power, one for everything else. USB is as Turing-complete as connectors go, if you excuse this analogy. Everything can then easier be adapted to use them instead of inventing a new format. With mass production lowering marginal costs to fractions of a cent, nothing exists that cannot be connected by some protocol driven over USB.

    4. Re:good. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      DVI can be adaptered to VGA, so there really is no reason for a pc to have a VGA port on it.

    5. Re:good. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 3, Informative

      DisplayPort is royalty-free; HDMI isn't.

      DisplayPort is also more computer-oriented than HDMI, so it is more flexible about what kind of data streams it can carry. For example, the latest version of the standard supports carrying USB signals and a wider range of audio formats than HDMI supports.

      Also, DisplayPort wasn't invented by Apple. They just adopted it (except for their own connector) because it suited their needs better than HDMI.

    6. Re:good. by srw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Firewire has better latency than USB2 and is better able to sustain it's specced data rate. That is why it is still used in professional video and audio applications. Oh, and we also use eSATA for the same reason. (Yes, I work in that industry.) Other than that, I think you're pretty much right on.

    7. Re:good. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Every single thing you just said is absolutely correct.

      I must say, that when you said "Probably no one has this on their must-have!!1! list." regarding eSATA, you are half wrong. I do agree that most users don't, but I fucking love eSATA.

      SATA is fucking great, and it solved all the stupid issues that IDE caused, while allowing me to build modest servers with consumer-grade very cheap disks (I would have never put an IDE drive on a server, SCSI all the way, but SATA is nice enough. Throw a software raid in the deal, and you have a cheap server that works just fine). Now, eSATA is paradise because it allowed me to trash all my desktops and use only my laptop. I can connect any disk natively to my laptop, now, how amazing is that? Yes, I know USB isn't that much slower than SATA, but it is noticeable. But that's not the most important thing: you are not connecting your disk natively. That means you lose some very important functions, like debug messages, sleep modes, and more importantly, SMART.

      I usually connect ~10 different HDs to my machine every week. eSATA is the best thing ever.

      Leaving that aside, connector compatibility and standardization is a must. Apple has always been one of the worst offenders regarding compatibility, and they will continue to be incompatible because they want to be "different".

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    8. Re:good. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2

      Find me something that can only do DVI-D output...

      Adaptering doesn't count.

    9. Re:good. by Spatial · · Score: 4, Informative

      eSATA is [...] marginally faster than USB2 for external drives only and few drives can steadily saturate a USB2 link at all. I'm not saying 480Mbps are enough for everyone [...] FireWire is dying. Zealots are drawing their knives now, but it adds nothing to USB2 or 3. Same for eSATA.

      I thought the same thing until I actually tested it. USB2 is very slow; it was probably a bottleneck ten years ago, let alone now.

      I have an external HDD with all three interfaces. How long do my backups take on each?
      eSATA: 2.2 hours (70 MB/sec, 560Mbps, limited by HDD)
      FW400: 3.8 hours (40 MB/sec, 320Mbps)
      USB2: 4.8 hours (32 MB/sec, 256Mbps)

      This is with a three-year-old 5400RPM 750GB model. In short, any old piece of crap can saturate USB2.

    10. Re:good. by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless USB3 can do DMA transfers (i.e. without needing the CPU's direct involvement) Firewire will stay. Honestly the USB standard seems to be a step backwards to PIO days.

      It was a crap standard back when it was released, which is fair enough, as it was designed to replace serial, parallel and the PS/2 ports, all slow devices. It was never designed for connecting disks to (or anything faster than 12mbit/s), which is why it sucks at most high throughput tasks (despite the tacked on bit added to it in USB2 to help it along).

      The only thing on the horizon which I can see as being an improvement over Firewire (and a unifying connector for all) is Intel's LightPeak technology, but even that has the limitation of not being able to transfer power to devices through the same cable.

    11. Re:good. by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm talking about business notebooks. From Toshiba. Mandated by an enterprise-wide IT department that has only the CEO himself to fear.

      Like these

      http://eu.computers.toshiba-europe.com/innovation/series/Tecra-M10-Series/1056372/

      VGA only. Digital video is for heretics and hopeless perfectionists. A 1400x1050 image on an external projector is meant to be blurry and I like it that way.

    12. Re:good. by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Displayport has more video and audio bandwidth and much more aux data bandwidth.
      As a VESA standard, it is royalty-free.
      It relates much more closely to how modern digital displays are driven, allowing "Direct Drive Displays" and eliminating certain complexities in encoding/decoding DVI/HDMI.
      eDP is replacing LVDS internally in notebooks, and iDP may replace LVDS in smaller devices, these share silicon with standard DP.

      A lot of good detailed info here (start on page 16):
      http://www.displayport.org/cms/sites/default/files/downloads/DisplayPort_Technical_Overview.pdf
      obviously from VESA so it has some marketing stuff, but the technical details are right. They do omit the ability of HDMI 1.4 to run 100 Mb Ethernet, and HDMI's support of more color profiles.

    13. Re:good. by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless USB3 can do DMA transfers (i.e. without needing the CPU's direct involvement) Firewire will stay. Honestly the USB standard seems to be a step backwards to PIO days.

      As somebody who is currently writing Linux device drivers for some extremely bizarre hardware which is capable of DMA, I can only say... "Hurrrgh?"

      What does DMA have to do with the USB3 wire protocol? DMA is a function of the host controller. If you want DMA capability, then put it in the controller. What on earth does this have to do with the wire signaling? Asking whether USB3 can do DMA is like asking if TCP/IP supports Microsoft Outlook.

      But I haven't read the USB3 spec. Perhaps it's a schizophrenic combination of physical specifications and host endpoint specifications, in which case I wonder what the hell somebody is smoking?

  2. Who cares about the power brick by Pojut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I want laptop internals to be standardized, which would help upgrades be much more bearable (and, in some cases, make them possible).

    1. Re:Who cares about the power brick by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The power supply is a good start. Just hope that they also can take a bite at the batteries which are incredibly expensive related to what they actually contain.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Who cares about the power brick by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would really restrict innovation if they did that.
      And let's be honest they pretty much have standardized the parts you tend to upgrade the most.
      1. Ram.
      2. Hard drives.
      3. wifi cards.
      What else do you want standardized?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Who cares about the power brick by bami · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Graphic cards.

      Most laptops have stupid Intel graphic chips that bolt onto the motherboard, but some laptops connect the graphics card to the motherboard using a MXM connector (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_PCI_Express_Module).

      I'd really hope that gets standardized, since it's being one of the most important components in a computer nowadays, with graphical acceleration not only for games but for example Photoshop, or all the nice CUDA things you can do with it.

    4. Re:Who cares about the power brick by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That certainly used to be true, but these days there is less of a reason for upgrading. My current laptop is almost 4 years old, and doesn't really feel slow most of the time. I still occasionally use the one that it replaced (I usually leave it connected to a projector for playing iPlayer stuff and music, and for settling arguments at parties), and it is around 7 years old.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Who cares about the power brick by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That would really restrict innovation if they did that."

      Well-designed form factors did the opposite for desktops.

      The standard PC form-factors fostered component innovation because development could be devoted to specific components with the assurance that they would have a standard "home" and a large potential market.

      That FREED them to compete on performance, which reinforced the value of standard form factors, and is why you can select from any number of standard PC cases today.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  3. Magsafe by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be nice if they all standardized on a magsafe interface. Although I doubt it would happen, too expensive.

    Regardless, this is great news. It would be very nice to have just 1 power brick for multiple devices.

  4. About time by kent_eh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At work we have a fleet of assorted laptops, and regularly have to go on a scrounge to find a power brick for someone who is visiting from another location who either left their brick at the other office/hotel/home/car and is running low on power

    Or someone is issued a new laptop, and it only comes with one brick (which is semi-permanently tied to the docking station) and they need another for portable use. Why can't we use the one from their old laptop?
    Even if it's the same manufacturer, the voltage or connector don't match. WTF?
    If we need a second power brick, we don't reward the OEM with extra money. It's 3rd party for that (and usually cheaper too)

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  5. PC laptops have sucky power supplies and ports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's hope they come up with a connector that is robust yet small, tugs out under pressure, doesn't limit the minimum height of the laptop, and so on.

    I doubt Apple will sign up, their connector already does all of the above. Now this Dell one here which meets none of them on the other hand is a good candidate for such a scheme.

    Also - kill off the large bulky power supplies, and give us smaller, more convenient supplies. Oh, look, Apple are already doing that too.

    I think the power supply on my netbook is nearly as big as the netbook itself. WHY OH WHY!!!

  6. I hope they figure out a magsafe type solution by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If every PC laptop uses the same plug, I would jump for joy. If it was an Apple style "magsafe" style connector I would get down on my knees and fellate each and every member of the standards committee. I've been griping for years now how the connector conspiracy is still going strong in the laptop space and what a pain it is to keep matching power cords to laptops.

    Also, a standardized connector would let third parties come in and start making accessories and replacement bricks for a lot less than the highway robbery prices that the brand names charge.

    Also, while they're at it, why not spec out a standarized battery compartment? Not everybody has to use it, but if all "regular size" laptops did, that would be a huge win. A standardized modular bay connector would be nice too. Not to mention a standardized docking adapter. It's like laptop manufacturers stopped caring about standardization after PCMCIA/PC-Card/Expresscard and have been more than willing to custom engineer everything every time. It's really annoying and the standardization efforts are long long overdue.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  7. Well... by rainmayun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good luck getting Apple to play along. While I prefer their design, I doubt they'd even license out the spec to other manufacturers.

    1. Re:Well... by TwiztidK · · Score: 3, Informative

      At present, Apple won't license their "MagSafe" connector to anyone.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone 5
    2. Re:Well... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Still, its not like Apple HAS to play along. Essentially if everyone else jumps on board, wouldn't it take away from Apple's value if its the ONLY laptop without the interchangable power brick?

      Who am I kidding, they'll tote it as an exclusive feature.

    3. Re:Well... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't understand what aspects, exactly, of the "magsafe" connector Apple actually possess exclusive rights to.

      Deep fat fryers, possibly among other appliances, have been using magnetic breakaway cords for decades to avoid the hazards associated with people snagging cords and being rewarded with a hot oil bath. Surely, using this principle in DC cabling can't qualify as novel...

      Is it the palendromic, connect-either-way bit?

    4. Re:Well... by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you certain? I've seen similar tearaway connectors on deep fryers.

    5. Re:Well... by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I doubt others would want the Apple design as it provides a continuity that limits profits. For instance, the inputs to the brick are all the same. Therefore if I lose a power cord, I can just use one of the input adaptors from another apple product. This includes the iPad, the Airport express, most everything. For products that do no use this design, a simple two prong cord is used that can be picked up anywhere. Compare this to my HP power supply which uses this weird cord that means I will probably have to replace the whole thing if I lose a $2 cord. In other words, if other manufacturers wanted to, they could already at least standardize the inputs. They haven't, which means the lack of standards provides some benefit.

      Beyond this is the expense of the power supply. While Apple has the ability to absorbs such costs, and MS based computer mostly does not have such leeway. People expect such computers to be cheap, and MS as shown a lack of willingness to lower prices to reflect that need, preferring the OEMs to bear the brunt. A universal power supply is going to be expensive. If people are going to use it everywhere, then it must be able to meet a range of power requirements, otherwise people are going to fry their laptops. While this is not a severe technical issue, just include some circuitry in the laptop and a communication channel to the power supply, it will add costs to the laptop and power supply.

      Right now Apple can charge more per watt for an power brick than most others, so they can supply a descent power brick. Also, for equal performance, the power brick has to supply less power, so the brick is actually cheaper than most others. A universal brick will cost more. Unless we get away from MS, which wants $90 for OEM retail Windows 7 Home, for a computer that costs $100 to build, I doubt we will be spending a great deal of money improving the brick.

      But all this might be moot. The UBS port seems to working as they de facto standard for any device that requires less than 15W of power. Give the direction of the market, we may see more of these devices, and manufacturers that do not charge over USB will be identified as outliers.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Well... by moonbender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Off the top of my head: Filter the light to transform the difference in color into a difference in intensity. E.g. if you covered the orange/green light from the extension cord with an orange semi-transparent tape, the light would be bright when the laptop is charging and dim when it's not. Should work, right?

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:Well... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or use rubber prong locks like Sony Ericsson phones. Or velcro. :-D There are alternatives to magnets. The most important things in a standard design, IMHO, are:

      • High efficiency with low standby current. Must be able to supply significantly multiple voltages upon request, depending on whether the computer is charging or not.
      • No penetration. All contacts should be surface (pressure) contacts. As soon as you have a prong going into a hole, there's the possibility of damaging the machine by yanking it at an angle. The design should be such that if anything gets damaged, it is the cord.
      • Low breakaway force. The force to detach from any angle should be less than the inertial mass of the computer plus friction against a potentially slick surface like a glass table. (Translation: the connector must not be recessed significantly into the side of the machine.)
      • Sufficiently large connector to grasp easily while the computer is sitting on a desk. You should not feel the need to pull the cable by the wire because the connector body is too short to grasp easily.
      • Replaceable cord. Replacing an eighty dollar power supply because a two dollar piece of wire breaks or frays is idiotic. Put a plug on both ends. Problem solved.

      I disagree with your suggestion that the computer unplug itself when fully charged and turned off. Between the self discharge rate, the standby power fed to the logic board used for soft power, and the power used by the battery's management board, the battery drains slowly over time even when the machine is off. The exact rate varies. If you leave a battery for a year or two, it can get down to such a low voltage that the charge circuit will refuse to charge the cells, at which point your battery is a brick. (Been there, done that more than once.) The computer disables its own charge circuit when the battery is charged and reactivates it when the battery falls below a threshold level. There's no need to take away its ability to do so just to conserve a tiny amount of power.

      Besides, that shouldn't save a significant amount of power anyway if the adapter is designed correctly. You're talking about the difference between an occasional short trickle charge initiated by the machine and a longer trickle charge when the person plugs it back in later to top up the last few percent on the battery. If you really want to reduce the power load, push for rules about how much standby power the machine can draw while plugged in, thus making that moot.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:Well... by Moridineas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. But from my experience, there are times when life might be easier without it. Yes, it does prevent breaking things if you yank too hard on the cable, and that's cool. But unless it (and the socket) is quite new, it doesn't always make a good connection. And as time goes by, the magnetism loses some of its mojo and the plug develops an annoying tendency to fall off the computer if you so much as look at it sideways.

      I've had the exact opposite experience. I have a going on 3.5 year old MBP and the Magsafe works perfectly. Have not had any falling out problems, any loss of magnetism, etc.

      On balance, I think I preferred the physical plugs Apple used with their iBooks.

      and I HATED that connector. I had a Powerbook I used for just about 3 years. I would have kept using it except I went through a power cord a year. The connector being round spun around and caused shorts in the wire. The first power cord I had literally sparked and caught on fire with it just sitting on my desk! (that one was replaced for free). The rest of the laptop still works fine but I have to position the power cord juuuuust so, to get any power at all. As a result of it constantly losing electrical input, I also had to go through two batteries in 3 years.

    9. Re:Well... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about if other manufacturers made oil cooled laptops that were also useable as deep fat fryers?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  8. Not for my laptop by davebarnes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "a standard 3-pin "kettle cord" for incoming power."

    Not for my Apple MacBook.
    I understand the desire for a standard brick, but I do not want to give the magnetic connector on my MacBook.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    1. Re:Not for my laptop by hedwards · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can blame Apple's "Think Different" approach to things. (Though oddly ironic in that it's misspelled) It's been their brand for sometime to do things differently even if it's not a good idea. Think hockey puck mouses and single button at that. Fortunately they've ditched that, but Apple does seem to have an at times pathological need to be different.

      I don't think that completely standardizing the plug is a great idea, what I'd like to see is for them to decide on how the polarity is expressed, sort of like how power outlets generally do. And for the cord that plugs into the brick to be one design. Preferably 3 pronged. And have a different size and color for the notebook end depending upon voltage.

    2. Re:Not for my laptop by pauljlucas · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can blame Apple's "Think Different" approach to things. (Though oddly ironic in that it's misspelled)

      Actually, it's not misspelled. It's intentionally not "Think Differently" because they're not telling you how to think. They're telling you what to think.

      Analogy: For a car ad campaign, I might say things like, "When you think of this car, think sleek, think bold, think power." Just as "think sleek" is short-hand for "think [about something that is] sleek," "Think Different" is short-hand for "think [about something that is] different."

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  9. Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by zmollusc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Then we can just connect straight to car batteries.
    Easy peasy charging in the car.
    12V sealed lead acid motorcycle battery in your pocket for when the li-ion is failing after a year.
    The broken-screen laptops we use as headless servers could have UPS for cheapness using old car batteries.

    It would be awesome!

    PleasePleasePlease!

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by Migraineman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ugh, automotive power is nasteee. Nominally 14V, unless it's cold outside, at which point it'll be closer to 18V. The ignition system will dump spikes into the rail that regularly approach 30V. Anything connected to the automotive supply is supposed to handle long excursions to 36V, and short excursions to 72V.

      Beyond that, there usually isn't much "extra" power available for non-factory devices. I recently had the displeasure of installing an AC inverter into a Chevy Venture minivan. The alternator was groaning under the load, which was less than 400W. Had to keep a foot on the throttle to increase the idle speed or we'd discharge the battery. We had about 1kW of equipment, but could only run about half at any given time (the stock alternator is only rated for 90A at 12V.)

    2. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Informative

      12VDC - Not gonna happen.

      Modern (beefy) laptops want about 70W when running, about 100-120W when running and charging. Pulling more than about 80W from a 12V lighter socket won't happen - most lighter sockets now-a-days are about 8 amps, and because the lighter socket is such an atrocious interface you really get about 11V at that current if the engine is running, so you are looking at about 80-90W.

      Even if you do as I have done and use manly power connectors (e.g. Anderson PowerPole) pulling more than 10A means seriously thick wire for any length.

      That's why many modern laptop power supplies run 18V or so - that extra 50% voltage means 2/3 the current at the same load, and 4/9ths the losses in the wire (for a given thickness of wire).

    3. Re:Please, electrical gods, make it 12V by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please, electrical gods, make it 12V

      Not going to happen. Laptops use 12V internally, which means the battery will be higher voltage than that (much higher in fact) and you need a supply voltage that is several volts higher than the battery to charge it, and higher still to be able to charge it while powered-on and running, too.

      The standard is ~20V, which isn't bad. Connect two car batteries in series and you get 24V. Throw in a handful of diodes to clean-up the power a bit, and they'll also drop a few volts, to the point it should be safe to use.

      12V sealed lead acid motorcycle battery in your pocket for when the li-ion is failing after a year.

      I love car batteries for stationary uses. They're just so dirt cheap, and are so large they have tons of power to offer. For mobile uses, however, there's good reason we use NiCd, NiMH, and LiIon. A lead-acid battery would weigh a ton. But more than that, it'll still only power the device for a fraction as long as any other type of battery. They just don't have remotely the energy density of LiIon.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  10. Re:Here are the specs, no further deliberation nee by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're making a standard, why not settle on a voltage level and stick with it? Adding a knob is just asking for people to set it wrong and fry their laptop. If you absolutely must have multiple voltages for some reason, then design the brick such that it automatically chooses the correct one. Plus a knob is a moving part, and will break.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  11. Re:Here are the specs, no further deliberation nee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those already exist, but you've completely missed the point. That's not a standard, that's one that can adjust to many standards. And if you handed one of those to someone and told them it was a standard laptop power supply that would work with any laptop, they'd probably do some pretty serious damage unless it happened to be set on the necessary settings for their current laptop.

  12. Non-standard form-factors = planned obsolescence by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Laptop makers have NO REASON to standardize.
    The ideal consumer product is shitcanned at point of purchase by a delighted customer (toilet paper comes to mind).

    Desktop PC form-factors made maintenance, part sourcing, and upgrading easy, but didn't help kill off old PCs.

    Notebook makers OTOH can count on the failure of key components such as batteries to render their products "beyond economical repair". Combine that with low prices and crap build quality, and you have the recipe for repeat sales. (Good to foster performance upgrades, not so good for economy and ease of maintenance.)

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  13. I half agree by name_already_taken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If every PC laptop uses the same plug, I would jump for joy. If it was an Apple style "magsafe" style connector I would get down on my knees and fellate each and every member of the standards committee. I've been griping for years now how the connector conspiracy is still going strong in the laptop space and what a pain it is to keep matching power cords to laptops.

    Ok, no on the blowjob thing; you don't know where those committee members have been.

    The "magsafe" connector is better than anyone who hasn't used it realizes. Not only does it "break away" nicely and easily, but it also means you don't have to use any effort to plug the thing in. I just get the connector within an inch or so and the magnet pulls it into place. I've just dangled the cord near my MacBook Pro and it will snap into place by itself.

    The strain relief on the Apple connectors sucks - it's basically nonexistent, so they can fail there, but if they fixed that (pretty easy) then it would be perfect.

    Also, while they're at it, why not spec out a standarized battery compartment?

    Because it's a silly idea. Even cars don't have standardized batteries. Ok, they do, but there are something like 20-30 different standardized car battery types.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  14. Before you get too excited. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a huge grain of salt:

    According to Taiwanese industry news site Digitimes these kinds of solutions may soon be superseded. It now appears that some of the major players in laptops are getting together to work on a standardized laptop power supply design. This includes the big branded players ASUS and Acer as well as the OEM manufacturers like Quanta and Compal, which are responsible for a lot of the non-brand name laptops available on the market.

    Basically it's just four Taiwanese OEM manufacturers (Yes ASUS is just as much an OEM as a brand name) trying to lessen the cost of manufacture by making the laptop power supply a commodity item. While this would be a good thing for all involved, I wouldn't start rejoicing until Foxconn expresses an interest and of course Dell, Apple, Lenovo, etc.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    1. Re:Before you get too excited. by Marcika · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a huge grain of salt:

      According to Taiwanese industry news site Digitimes these kinds of solutions may soon be superseded. It now appears that some of the major players in laptops are getting together to work on a standardized laptop power supply design. This includes the big branded players ASUS and Acer as well as the OEM manufacturers like Quanta and Compal, which are responsible for a lot of the non-brand name laptops available on the market.

      Basically it's just four Taiwanese OEM manufacturers (Yes ASUS is just as much an OEM as a brand name) trying to lessen the cost of manufacture by making the laptop power supply a commodity item. While this would be a good thing for all involved, I wouldn't start rejoicing until Foxconn expresses an interest and of course Dell, Apple, Lenovo, etc.

      Yea right, just some OEM manufacturers... LMGIFY:

      "Quanta Computer Incorporated (TWSE: 2382) is a Taiwan-based manufacturer of notebook computers and other electronic hardware. It is the largest manufacturer of notebook computers in the world. Its customers include ACER, Alienware, Apple Inc., Cisco, Compaq, Dell, Fujitsu, Gateway, Gericom, Hewlett-Packard, Lenovo, Maxdata, MPC, Sharp Corporation, Siemens AG, Sony, Sun Microsystems, and Toshiba.[...] It is estimated that Quanta had a 33% worldwide market share of notebook computers in 2005."

    2. Re:Before you get too excited. by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Asus and Quanta make laptops for Dell, Compaq, Apple, and Sony. These OEMs basically make most of the laptop computers out there on the market today. When they get behind an initiative, it's a big step because they are the ones making all of the little laptops. Of course, Dell, Apple, etc. don't have to follow but it's a big step anyway.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re:Before you get too excited. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. I just think there's a long road ahead. More political than technical, but still..

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  15. Re:Non-standard form-factors = planned obsolescenc by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know.. Cell phone manufacturers were in the exact same camp. Until China decided no Cell phone could be sold in China without a Mini or Micro USB power adapter. Suddenly, darn near every cell phone now has one..

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  16. Re:Scalper by imakemusic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes because they tout, i.e. flaunt, the tickets.

    Tout: advertize in strongly positive terms; "This product was touted as a revolutionary invention"

    Tote: Lug: carry with difficulty; "You'll have to lug this suitcase"

    --
    Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  17. Re:Just like they did with cell phones.... by Morty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Micro-USB is not just about size, it's actually the official replacement for mini-USB. micro-USB is designed to handle more disconnect/reconnect cycles than mini-USB, so it's better even if your devices are large enough to not need micro-USB. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Mini_and_Micro

    I also grumbled about replacing my mini-USB chargers, but at least it's standard-for-standard. I now have two connectors to deal with (some devices still on mini-USB, some devices on micro-USB) as opposed to a mess of proprietary connectors.

  18. As long as incompatible ones use diff. connectors by sirwired · · Score: 3, Informative

    Twice now I've had IBM/Lenovo laptops that use the same connectors as their predecessors, yet have increased wattage requirements that make the old supplies risky to use. I remember when our office transitioned from 600's to T20's. So many people were re-using the plug-and-voltage-compatible supplies and burning out the power regulators on the system board that IT started putting bright green stickers on every machine warning you that you should only use the higher-power supplies.

    Again, from T60 -> W500's... increased wattage requirements, same voltage and connector. While this one isn't burning out laptops, the older bricks run HOT.

    SirWired

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Itchy and Scratchy Land by Twinbee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was an episode of the Simpsons called "Itchy and Scratchy Land", and from that episode, there was a map with an attraction named "Unnecessary Surgery Land".

    Hence I coined the phrase UWS or "Unnecessary Work Syndrome" for things exactly like this, where every manufacturer spends thousands or even millions of dollars to come up with their own special version of say... the power brick.

    I'm not sure if open source is appropriate all the time, but open standards are such a no-brainer, it hurts.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  21. Re:Maybe it's because .. by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative

    That article says nothing about standardization. It indicates the power supplies have to meet certain efficiency standards. That's all.

  22. Not a kettle lead. by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 2, Informative
    I see lots of people refer to the IEC C14 connector as a 'kettle lead' For one, it won't plug into a kettle - there is a notch. Secondly the kettle lead is likely to have a 13amp fuse in the plug, and computer should have a 5 amp in the plug. The proper name for a kettle plug is the IEC C14.

    The kettle leads are also rated to work at higher temperatures, which is one of the reasons you can got from kettle to pc, but not from pc to kettle.

    Also, do you guys in the US have kettles? I'm sure I've read many times that your electricity is too weak to power a kettle , here in the UK we can get 3KW kettles which will boil a couple of litres of water in a minute or so.

  23. Re:Scalper by nabsltd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't seem to find the "+1 Yiddish" mod. I guess that'll be added to the 3.0 discussion system.

  24. I can haz 12 volts back? by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure there's some technical reason that laptop makers keep increasing the voltages they use rather than increasing the available current at the old voltage - my current Dell wants 19. 5v, and my previous IBM wanted 20. But it really would be nice to have 12 volts again, so I could power the laptop from my car, or my portable car jump-starter battery, or from those 12-volt solar panels, as opposed to my current combination of 12Vdc-to-120Vac inverter and laptop power cord. You might want a surge protector in line, to avoid problems when you're starting you car, but you shouldn't need more than that.

    Anybody know if we can get back to 12 volts?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks