Slashdot Mirror


'Forest Bathing' Considered Healthful

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that although allergies and the promise of air-conditioning tend to drive people indoors at this time of year, when people spend time in more natural surroundings — forests, parks, and other places with plenty of trees — they experience increased immune function. A study of 280 healthy people in Japan, where visiting nature parks for therapeutic effect has become a popular practice called 'Shinrin-yoku,' or 'forest bathing,' found that being among plants produced 'lower concentrations of cortisol, lower pulse rate, and lower blood pressure,' among other things. Another study in 2007 showed that men who took two-hour walks in a forest over two days had a 50-percent spike in levels of natural killer cells, and a third study found an increase in white blood cells that lasted for a week in women exposed to phytoncides in forest air."

252 comments

  1. Am I the only one? by Polarina · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one that read the title as "'Forest Bathing' Considered Harmful"?

    1. Re:Am I the only one? by dintech · · Score: 1

      I think that was the idea. A sort of weird Dijkstra parody.

    2. Re:Am I the only one? by mdsharpe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, same here. Perhaps I haven't been Forest Bathing enough recently.

    3. Re:Am I the only one? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Funny

      I must admit that the title immediately got me thinking about opalescent pools of water surrounded by trees and then wondering if it would be so healthy if said pool contained an overly territorial venomous water snake or an alligator having a bad day...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:Am I the only one? by Hodapp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No. I even re-read the summary about 10 times in a row, trying to figure out what exactly was harmful about forest bathing.

    5. Re:Am I the only one? by Spazztastic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I the only one that read the title as "'Forest Bathing' Considered Harmful"?

      It's a kdawson article, what do you expect? The moron decided to change the title from the original submission of "'Forest Bathing' is Good for Your Health" that pickens submitted it as to this garbage.

      Also, I read it as the same thing.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    6. Re:Am I the only one? by thijsh · · Score: 2, Funny

      I read: "Forced Bathing Considered Harmful", and thought: 'Well duhh, every little boy will agree'. :-)

    7. Re:Am I the only one? by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      I actually saw it as "Hateful" at first.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    8. Re:Am I the only one? by StDoodle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had the same double-take, so I looked it up. "Healthful" means something that promotes good health. "Healthy" is a state of good health. In other words, the title is absolutely correct. If you would prefer "'Forest Bathing' Considered Healthy" then you're asking for a title implying that someone named "Forest Bathing" is in a good state of health.

    9. Re:Am I the only one? by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Informative

      No you're not, and in my case that's because "healthful" isn't a word I recognise as being (UK) English, so my brain obviously substituted a similar real world.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto, bloody editors.

    11. Re:Am I the only one? by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bathing forest dyslexia cures?

    12. Re:Am I the only one? by thijsh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahem, please adhere to correct terminology: WOOOOOSH! 2x combo!!!

    13. Re:Am I the only one? by mdsharpe · · Score: 0

      Borest Fathing?

    14. Re:Am I the only one? by jimbobborg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would prefer a horny Naiad, but that's just me.

    15. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one that read the title as "'Forest Bathing' Considered Harmful"?

      read it the same way as well.. title is annoying

    16. Re:Am I the only one? by edittard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps it was too long to fit in the headline? Still retarded though, since there's already a perfectly cromulent (and shorter) word: healthy.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    17. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm so sick of UK language snobs...particularly the ones who speak from the wrong orifice. MW says 'healthful' dates back to the 14th century. I'm not sure what other kinds of English they had back then, but I'm betting this qualifies as (UK) English.

    18. Re:Am I the only one? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's that? Some sort of toad?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    19. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Am I the only one that read the title as "'Forest Bathing' Considered Harmful"?

      It's a kdawson article, what do you expect? The moron decided to change the title from the original submission of "'Forest Bathing' is Good for Your Health" that pickens submitted it as to this garbage.

      Also, I read it as the same thing.

      'Considered Harmful'

    20. Re:Am I the only one? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I must admit that the title immediately got me thinking about opalescent pools of water surrounded by trees and then wondering if it would be so healthy if said pool contained an overly territorial venomous water snake or an alligator having a bad day...

      And working out in the exclusive East Bank Club here in Chicago might be dangerous if the pilates instructor turned out to be a serial killer and cut your throat.

      So what's your point? That if you go outside your house there's a chance that something bad might happen? Or that if you are born there is a near certainty that something bad will happen to you at some point in your life?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:Am I the only one? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      As long as it's not a candirú fish.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    22. Re:Am I the only one? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Actually, I read the headline as "Forget Bathing, it's Considered Harmful". Considering it was published by kdawson I assume he was just announcing to the world something we all already suspected.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    23. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    24. Re:Am I the only one? by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      He didn't say it wasn't UK English, only that it wasn't a word he recognised as UK English. Which would be because everyone uses "healthy" or "good for you" instead.

    25. Re:Am I the only one? by photogchris · · Score: 2, Informative

      a water nymph originally of Greek mythology.

    26. Re:Am I the only one? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      I would prefer a horny Naiad, but that's just me.

      I bring one with me...

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    27. Re:Am I the only one? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      It was a weak attempt at a joke.

      I played Dungeons & Dragons for about 12 years of my life and there was a time I could have told you, off the top of my head, not only what a water nymph was but also how many hit points it had, what its Armour Class was and what dice you rolled when working out how many of them appeared as random encounters.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    28. Re:Am I the only one? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Wow! Get a sense of humour, please!

      I was just playing on the words "forest bathing" and whether or not it could be deemed as healthy for you, nothing more than that!

      Are you having a really bad day or something???

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    29. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye, in fact I was confused about the conflict the title and the summary until you pointed it out.

      When I only see $foobar Co*****ed H***ful and assume Dijkstra's quote.

    30. Re:Am I the only one? by Gilmoure · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      i bet Phineas and Ferb could help out this guy.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    31. Re:Am I the only one? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Run, Forest, run!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    32. Re:Am I the only one? by fritsd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Careful.. it's just after Midsommar.. could be a disguised Nixie instead!

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    33. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think you bathing in his forest pool would make the alligator's day considerably better.

    34. Re:Am I the only one? by LeotheQuick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quit hatin on kdawson he does a good job.

    35. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MW says 'healthful' dates back to the 14th century. I'm not sure what other kinds of English they had back then, but I'm betting this qualifies as (UK) English

      Wikipedia says that UK has been formed in 1800, so it does not.

    36. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe english is not the op mother tongue.

    37. Re:Am I the only one? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Actually I think you bathing in his forest pool would make the alligator's day considerably better.

      Yup. No fangs, claws, scales, fur.... just wiggling red meat with a fuzzy screaming thing on the top....
      That's like some kind of alligator lollipop.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    38. Re:Am I the only one? by s1d3track3D · · Score: 1

      not sure, I usually only skim, so I saw something about 'Forest Bathing,...',

      what's more disturbing to me is who I thought wrote it, I thought it was odd that a texas oil man would care about such a thing.
      (Hugh Pickens != T. Boone Pickens)

    39. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it was too long to fit in the headline?

      Still retarded though, since there's already a perfectly cromulent (and shorter) word: healthy.

      The headline was embiggened.

    40. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I must admit that the title immediately got me thinking about opalescent pools of water surrounded by trees and then wondering if it would be so healthy if said pool contained an overly territorial venomous water snake or an alligator having a bad day...

      Funny, it immediately got me thinking about opalescent pools of water surrounded by trees and filled with water nymph's splashing about and laughing. With, of course, no clothes on.
      I am not interested in trading fantasies with you, good sir.

    41. Re:Am I the only one? by juancnuno · · Score: 1

      Not at all, I read it that way too. How odd.

    42. Re:Am I the only one? by Skrynkelberg · · Score: 1

      Nope. I didn't know healthful was a word.

    43. Re:Am I the only one? by grh_angelone · · Score: 1

      nope. me, too. maybe because "considered healthful" is not worth a story? who wrote this, cpt. obvious?

    44. Re:Am I the only one? by Avalon's_Avatar · · Score: 1

      ** WARNING**
      Forest bathing can turn your skin blue and grow a USB port out of your ponytail!

    45. Re:Am I the only one? by luther2.1k · · Score: 1

      Indeed, wtf is wrong with 'healthy'? I cringe whenever I see this and other pointless neologisms.

    46. Re:Am I the only one? by luther2.1k · · Score: 1

      Ah, it's been around since the 14th century. Still, it's one of those words that annoys the hell out of me for reasons I can't quite understand.

    47. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you Yoda?

    48. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read Hatefull

  2. Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Increasing exposure to foreign elements leads to a stronger immune system? ASTOUNDING.

  3. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by dintech · · Score: 1

    I think it is astounding. I just shows how little we understand about the immune system still.

  4. Breaking news by NekSnappa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People who get off their ass and go outside are healthier than those who don't.

    --
    I want to shoot the messenger!
    1. Re:Breaking news by CraftyJack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That seems obvious, but wait until you see the rest of the comments.

    2. Re:Breaking news by lxs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you'll find this to be a controversial statement around these parts.

    3. Re:Breaking news by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also helps allergies:

      I've read several studies in Science News that show exposing allergic bodies to the outdoors "trains" the immune system to ignore things like pollen, dust, and so on as simply part of the natural environment.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:Breaking news by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also helps allergies:

      I've read several studies in Science News that show exposing allergic bodies to the outdoors "trains" the immune system to ignore things like pollen, dust, and so on as simply part of the natural environment.

      I've also read studies that picking your nose and eating your boogers increases your immune system. Seems plausible since your nose filters out pollen, dust, and other things your body shouldn't be absorbing.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    5. Re:Breaking news by Hodapp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Both groups "got off their ass" and "went outside". The comparison was between walking in a city area, and walking in a forest.
      Did you even open the article?

    6. Re:Breaking news by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you even read the summary? It's not just taking a walk outside, it's walking through the woods. This study has nothing to do with exersize or being sedentary, it's about breathing woodland air. AFAIK exersize has never been shown to boost the immune system (someone please correct me if I'm wrong).

      I read about another study that showed that children who live in spotlessly clean homes are more prone to allergies and athsma than kids whose moms are slobs. This may be related somehow, I don't know.

    7. Re:Breaking news by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      I read about another study that showed that children who live in spotlessly clean homes are more prone to allergies and athsma than kids whose moms are slobs. This may be related somehow, I don't know.

      That may be because the kids in the spotless homes don't get enough germs in their body to build up antibodies. These are the same kids who probably weren't allowed to play in the dirt, compared to ones who live in homes that aren't as well maintained.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    8. Re:Breaking news by augi01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In conjunction with this rather astonishing remark, it may also be the case that walking in the forest removes one from an environment associated with many stressful things, i.e. work, school, etc, thereby decreasing their overall stress level. A healthy mind is just as important as a healthy body.

      --
      No yesterday, no tomorrow, and no today.
    9. Re:Breaking news by datapharmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tried, but it is pay-walled. Oh well. I guess I will stay ignorant until an unlocked source appears.

      --
      Get a web developer
    10. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder I thought I was superman after eating paste in kindergarden!

    11. Re:Breaking news by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Ya know it seems kind of wacky but I think I've been losing my cat allergy. Before we got married my wife always had cats, I said "Them or me" and the cats were gone. Then a few years later she missed them and wanted one badly so I gave in with the rule that it had to stay out of the bedroom.

      Now months later the cat sleeps by my pillow and I don't break out like I used to and my eyes don't water. I still find myself avoiding other cats by habit but I wonder if I'm still allergic to them at all.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    12. Re:Breaking news by Hodapp · · Score: 1

      Whoa, that's weird, I just read it 10-15 minutes ago, but it's pay-walled now for me too.

    13. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the astronauts at the ISS!

    14. Re:Breaking news by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think it might depend whether the cat has been out getting pollen on its fur. My hay fever doesn't seem as bad as it used to be either though, at least I don't get itchy eyes like I used to.

      I've found out recently I get rashes on my arms/shoulders if they come into contact with grass, though my hands are fine with it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:Breaking news by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      It's not so wacky; I've noticed the same effect with my wife's dog (though the ultimatum went the other way in our case; keeping the dog was non-negotiable). With prolonged exposure to the allergen, your reaction to it will be reduced. I think it's something to do with the immune system being overly sensitive to the allergen, but "learning" over time to not react so strongly (but that's basically speculation on my part). You should note though that your allergy may not be entirely gone. I no longer get allergy attacks from our dog, but do get them if there is more than one dog in the house. We had a second dog for a while (rescued) and I had to go through the acclimatization process again for her too.

      And it goes without saying that this doesn't apply at all to anaphylactic reactions like allergies to bee stings, shellfish, nuts, or things like that.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    16. Re:Breaking news by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      This study has nothing to do with exersize

      Is that what stops you getting plus-size?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    17. Re:Breaking news by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

      Unless one has a mortgage and should really be out looking for a job or solving the other real problems that cause stressful things.

      I, personally, would be thinking "why the heck am I walking around this hot sticky forest risking skin cancer and rabies instead of trying to deal with my problems."

      It's good for people who can just let these things slip their mind I guess.

    18. Re:Breaking news by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Ooh, plus, having 2 hours of completely free time a day to hug trees is correlated with having lower levels of stress. SOTP TEH PRESSAS!!11!

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    19. Re:Breaking news by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>eating your boogers increases your immune system.

      No not really. The stomach acid dissolves the mucus which means the immune system never gets to "see" the pollen and dust that was being held in suspension.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    20. Re:Breaking news by natehoy · · Score: 2

      No, but it keeps everyone around you away, and that in turn decreases you exposure to communicable diseases. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    21. Re:Breaking news by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Remember also that many of us (e.g. all Europeans) are descendants of forest people, evolved to live in that environment. 50% of land used to be covered in trees, but we've cut most of them down in the last 2000 years.

    22. Re:Breaking news by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Another study in 2007 showed that men who took two-hour walks in a forest over two days had a 50-percent spike in levels of natural killer cells, and a third study found an increase in white blood cells that lasted for a week in women exposed to phytoncides in forest air."

      What they're describing here in this second study is an heightened immune response. Now when I don't have allergies, such an immune response is fine, it's probably healthy too. That being said, when I have allergies, I certainly don't want more killer cells or white blood cells, during those times I already have way too many of those!!!!

    23. Re:Breaking news by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or it could just be that people who tend to stay indoors all the time also lean towards being neurotic pansies and hypochondriacs.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:Breaking news by HJED · · Score: 2

      There have been a number of studies showing that people can build up immunities to their allergies.
      I have experienced this personally as I used to have gluten and dairy allergies but over time they disappeared (my allergies weren't very sever though so I had little bits of dairy and gluten every now and then which probably helped).
      My sister had a similar experience to your self, she used to be mildly allergic to cats but over time living with them she stopped showing symptoms.

      --
      null
    25. Re:Breaking news by BradleyAndersen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When my children's school forces them to use hand sanitizer by the gallon, and when I see other people's homes so immaculate a single mite of dust does not exist, I cringe, because I know we are no longer allowing children to build any real immunity to anything. Have asthma? Take Tae Kwon Do ... the extra breathing you train yourself to do may just remove the asthma. This terribly written and short-on-details article has a real point.

    26. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can safely eat many things that would be harmful if inhaled, your stomach is different than your lungs.

    27. Re:Breaking news by icebrain · · Score: 2

      I know I've lost mine. Used to have bad runny nose, sneezing, watery eyes, etc. Then I lived with a cat, and then two cats. It went away. I still keep the "no cats in the bedroom" rule despite my wife's protests, but that's personal preference--I don't want them in my bed, I don't want their shed hair in my bed, and I don't want them walking on/poking/laying on me while I'm sleeping--that tends to wake me up in a loud and violent manner.

      More cats don't bother me; the in-laws have six and I don't have a problem with those.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    28. Re:Breaking news by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this effect myself, I'll sneeze for the first week or two that i'm around a new furry critter until I get acclimated.

      However, it turns out you may be wrong about the nuts part at least. I had heard about this from a nanny friend of mine.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    29. Re:Breaking news by dorkinson · · Score: 1

      Where's "+1, Bringdown" on this mod list?

    30. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are positing that all people with environmental allergies need to do to be cured is go outside more.
      Funny, but my forty-plus years of empirical data doesn't show that. Odd what actual experience will bring to light, isn't it.

    31. Re:Breaking news by Zarniwoop · · Score: 1

      Awesome! I am superman!!

      --
      Still not dead.
    32. Re:Breaking news by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Maybe you've found an undocumented side effect of Toxoplasmosis.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    33. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit. Forgot to log out.

    34. Re:Breaking news by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >And it goes without saying that this doesn't apply at all to anaphylactic reactions like allergies to bee stings, shellfish, nuts, or things like that.

      Indeed, those go the other way entirely. I've been allergic to bee stings my whole life. As a child the symptoms were about as benign as they could be: delayed swelling (by about 12 hours). With each subsequent sting however, the allergy got worse and worse. The last time I got stung I ended up in hospital needing antihistamine injections and an tube down my throat as the swelling was making it impossible to breath.
      That was a good ten years ago though, I'm very careful around them - which is why I haven't been stung since, and I keep an epi-pen with me at all times.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    35. Re:Breaking news by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, that's what happens when you don't have enough coffee to be able to spell a simple word properly, let alone take into consideration the proximity of S and Z on a keyboard.

    36. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, personally, would be thinking "why the heck am I walking around this hot sticky forest risking skin cancer and rabies instead of trying to deal with my problems."

      It's funny how you can determine if someone is fat based entirely on the specious complaints they make.

    37. Re:Breaking news by spiralx · · Score: 1

      I grew up with cats and was fine until I left home for uni at 18, then the next time I went home about 3 months later it was the works - streaming eyes and nose and constant sneezing. Same when I started going out with a girl who had a kitten, but after a year or so I was back to being fine, and rarely get any symptoms at all now - only when a long-haired cat is moulting can it be a problem.

    38. Re:Breaking news by siride · · Score: 1

      You countered with an anecdote? Seriously?

    39. Re:Breaking news by antdude · · Score: 1

      Not for me. I went to camping up in nearby mountains and it made my eyes tear like crazy all day. It made no difference than living in a city. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    40. Re:Breaking news by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Unless one has a mortgage and should really be out looking for a job or solving the other real problems that cause stressful things.

      Stress is usually caused by lack of control in the first place. It's not the things that are problems in your life, but the things that are problems that you seem to have no ability to change. Sometimes this perception is wrong and there are always things that can be done, but that doesn't mean you can always "do something" to make your life less stressful by solving the sources of stress.

      Actually my first thought upon reading the summary was, that people who have enough free time and live somewhere with access to forests are probably going to have lower blood pressure and many other better health attributes than the norm, regardless of whether or not they actually go walking regularly.

    41. Re:Breaking news by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      I've also read studies that picking your nose and eating your boogers increases your immune system.

      I knew that wasn't a bad habit, but it can cause nosebleeds if your not careful.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    42. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Exersize" might not do anything, but *exercise* just might have an effect:

      http://www.presidentschallenge.org/misc/news_research/research_digests/June2001.pdf

    43. Re:Breaking news by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I read about another study that showed that children who live in spotlessly clean homes are more prone to allergies and athsma than kids whose moms are slobs.

      Actually you are slightly misremembering that study. That study found that a cleaner house was healthier up to a point, after which the benefits were reversed. The authors of the study speculated that this result had to do with residue that resulted from having pets (hair, bits of dried skin, etc). I have never seen a report on a follow up study that determined if they were correct.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    44. Re:Breaking news by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, people in a relaxed atmosphere are healthier. Ther article states:
      " But scientists also chalk it up to phytoncides,"

      But they didn't test for that i any way. Nothing new here. Now when they do proper tests with phytoncides, then we may see something interesting.

      Also, you don't 'boost' an immune system. Using that term shows that not only are you ignorant, you are willing to substitute marketing gibberish for actual knowledge or thought.

      Stop it.

      The immune system is a very complex system that is comprised of many parts.

      Exercises impacts the immune response on the elderly and people who lead a sedentary life style.

      Why? well that's a good question. We don't know all the effects it has on the cells role in the immunity system.

      I am not an immunologist. For more information I recommend consulting the literature or listen to the quackcast and/or puscast podcasts by Mark Crislip.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    45. Re:Breaking news by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Taking a break to calm down and organize ones thoughts reduces stress and allows a person to think of new ways to approach problems that cause stress.

      Also, there are some stresses beyond being unemployed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    46. Re:Breaking news by delinear · · Score: 1

      Possible, however, from reading TFS (I'll admit I'm not about to RTFA, it's almost time to bail) it sounds like it's also possibly these very groups who are gaining benefit from this practice, and it's got to promote better mental health - which is a big factor in physical health - to just get out of the city once in a while.

    47. Re:Breaking news by delinear · · Score: 1

      Again, this is not about building immunities (why do so many /.ers seem to have the impression that forests are diease ridden filth holes where you go to expose yourself to nasty germs?), and I don't think you really need to worry on the hand sanitiser front. It seems to me that kids will always find a way to get messy and share their germs around, no matter how much you try to prevent it (trust me, I don't have kids but my GF is a children's theatre nurse, she encounters them in surgery - the cleanest possible environment, and she still manages to bring back every imaginable bug and virus and immediately share it with me).

    48. Re:Breaking news by delinear · · Score: 1

      Probably massively exposed on day one and your immune system went crazy. I dare say if you'd done as suggested in TFA, spending a few hours here and there in between your normal daily routine, over the course of a few weeks you would gradually acclimatise. It's the difference between being cold and jumping straight into a hot bath, or climing into a luke warm bath and adding more hot water - the highest temperature is the same but your body has more time to adjust.

    49. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meh its not wacky, I have a minor allergy to cats and dogs but it only surfaces when I'm not around any for weeks. then within a day or two of being around them its gone.

    50. Re:Breaking news by delinear · · Score: 1

      They're refitting the kitchens at work, so no easy access to caffeine for the next two weeks. I feel your pain. Seriously, we're developers, why even have us come into the office with no develper-fuel to make us work?

    51. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. Providing a counter-example is the simplest way to disprove any theory.

    52. Re:Breaking news by delinear · · Score: 1

      This is about the difference between the people who had 2 hours to wander around the city and the people who had 2 hours to wander around the forest and the increased benefits of the latter. That's not to say you wouldn't get some benefit if you only have 2 hours a week, or ten minutes a day. I guess for city dwellers it's a reason to lobby for more green space, for those already lucky enough to have green spaces nearby but not taking advantage, it's useful knowledge.

    53. Re:Breaking news by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you're joking or not, but I wonder if there may be something to that (yeah digestive acid makes hash of it once it hits the stomach, but the mouth is a different environment). Kids tend to do a lot of instinctive things, and picking their nose and eating it is clearly one of them -- since most kids do it, unless disciplined not to.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    54. Re:Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how you can determine if someone is fat based entirely on the specious complaints they make.

      I figured that out at "BigSlowTarget".

    55. Re:Breaking news by russotto · · Score: 1

      I've read several studies in Science News that show exposing allergic bodies to the outdoors "trains" the immune system to ignore things like pollen, dust, and so on as simply part of the natural environment.

      As a severe hay fever sufferer, I'm not buying it. Sensitization is more likely than desensitization. And I suspect systemic bias against allergy sufferers in this study; people who have an allergic reaction to pollen will typiucally not engage in "forest bathing".

    56. Re:Breaking news by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      I agree with the "no cats in bed" rule, for some reason one cat loves to attack my crotch first thing in the morning! Yeah, nice way to wake up, claws of fury scraping their way to your nether regions.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    57. Re:Breaking news by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I bring a thermos because I'm usually the first one here and otherwise I couldn't work until the pot was done perking. And it's a Mister Coffee, so it takes FOREVER. I love my Bunn-O-Matic at home, 12 cups in less than 5 minutes. I start the coffee, and it's usually done before I finish taking a piss.

    58. Re:Breaking news by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Oh, I feel so much better about my messy home now. I'll just tell my mother-in-law the the tufts of dog hair, the dusty shelves, and the trail of mud and pine needles from the kids coming in and out is strictly maintained for the benefit of their health.

    59. Re:Breaking news by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      The only thing spending more time outdoors around pine trees in NC has done for me since moving here in 2003 has just this year made the pollen these produce act like acid on my skin. It looks like a poison ivy rash, but instead burns instead of itches and cremes/washing immediately upon contact doesn't stop it.

      Never had a problem with it until this year. Sitting in a bench in a park, picking up an item dusted with it even weeks after the initial launch, having the wind blow it on me, instant painful outbreak.

      combine that with being whiter than snow and burning while outside in sunlight for more than 8 min i've secluded myself into a room, peeking between the blinds muttering about the murdering trees and the yellowface that burns me.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    60. Re:Breaking news by GreggBz · · Score: 1
    61. Re:Breaking news by holmstar · · Score: 1

      So you are positing that all people with environmental allergies need to do to be cured is go outside more.

      Yes, exactly. My wife previously had severe pollen and mold allergies, but a few years ago, she started taking allergy shots. Allergy shots really do nothing more than regularly expose you to the allergens that cause you problems. You can achieve the same result by spending a lot of time outside. One of my friends also had allergies, but then started to coach high school tennis. After a few summers of that, his allergies were gone.

    62. Re:Breaking news by sjames · · Score: 1

      Given the health effects, I'd say it is the less spotless home that is well maintained.

    63. Re:Breaking news by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      This is about the difference between the people who had 2 hours to wander around the city and the people who had 2 hours to wander around the forest

      What on earth leads you to that conclusion? I take it that your parents had the same last name before they were married.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  5. Duh by jridley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I grew up on a farm, and the only people who had air conditioning were living in town. I didn't even know what allergies were; none of my friends or anyone in their family had them, until I started making friends with people who lived in town and had air conditioning and super clean houses. THEY had allergies.

    1. Re:Duh by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my hatred for concrete hell (the city) is justified. We'd all be doing ourselves a favor if, instead of fearing the ongoing city depopulation, we embraced it.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly! One theory is that the prevalence of allergies in modern times is a result of our "super clean" environments around us. The body's immune system has nothing to fight off, so instead it starts attacking even the most benign invaders -- any little bit of pollen or something it hasn't encountered before. The result of this is allergic reactions to nearly anything and everything out there. And those reactions are only getting worse as time goes on (i.e., the preponderance of peanut allergies in children).

    3. Re:Duh by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      The body's immune system has nothing to fight off, so instead it starts attacking even the most benign invaders

      It's the same reason why researchers going to civilizations with no contact with the outside world have to be careful about spreading germs -- they have had no contact with bacteria and virus' that develop in large civilizations so they are very susceptible to infection.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    4. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You lived on a farm, i.e. you probably had lots and lots of clean air around you. Your city dwelling friends were surrounded by vast amounts of pollutants.

    5. Re:Duh by viking099 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, urban sprawl is much better for humanity and the environment than living in a city.

      Why, when I was a kid and went to Jacksonville Beach, I could drive for miles along the coastal highway and not see a house or a condo. Thank goodness the developers were so forward thinking that they plopped huge condo developments and beautiful beach houses all along the highway so that the water can't even be seen any more!

      And look at all those nasty forests that have been clearcut to bare earth, razed, paved, and piped so that people could escape the "concrete hell."

      There's nothing wrong with city living. There is something wrong with living your entire life in a closed environment. The more people live in the cities, the more area we have to play in when we just have to GTFO of town and relax.

    6. Re:Duh by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      And you probably ate real food instead of modified "commodity crops". Not bad for your health and immune system either.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    7. Re:Duh by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I grew up in a smallish town with lots of nature around and was in a forest every day - except in the winter. I live in a village now and am still almost every day in a forest. My home never was sterile. I've got urticaria since 2004 forcing me to take histamine antagonists every single day, and sometimes, when they not help, even corticosteroids.

      Please do not oversimplify things.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:Duh by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Who would have thought that the immune system treats any foreign object as harmful. Once exposed to it, your immune system responds by trying to kill it. If it can't, it just gets used to it. Simplified, but fairly accurate description.

      Moving from a hyper-clean environment into a natural one will of course expose you to many things which cause an immune response upon first contact: Fungus and pine spores, dust mites, pollens, bacteria and protozoa, all of which will cause an immune response which is far more aggressive than anyone who encounters them in every day life.

      Holy crap, I failed Human Biology and this isn't surprising to me.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    9. Re:Duh by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My wife grew up surrounded by animals and has extremely bad allergies. She didn't know what it was like to breathe normally until she moved into her first apartment that had always been animal-free.

      Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.

    10. Re:Duh by gabebear · · Score: 1

      What city depopulation are you talking about?

      You could also read this report to be a strongly in favor of cities. Urban/Rural living is much more likely to be a sterile airconditioned monoculture than city living.

      http://nymag.com/news/features/35815/
      http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/new-york-citys-superior-health/

    11. Re:Duh by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Yes, urban sprawl is much better for humanity and the environment than living in a city.

      Actually - you're correct. Converting stripped farmland to suburbs has created an increase in the number of trees over the last 100 years.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:Duh by jelizondo · · Score: 1

      Be careful, if you start embracing city dwellers, they multiply

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
    13. Re:Duh by viking099 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has increased a monoculture of trees in the form of stripped native forests that have been replanted with pulpwood trash pines.

      DAGS on the American Chestnut tree to see what can happen to a monoculture.

      Sure more trees is better than fewer trees, but a 5 year old slash pine isn't nearly as useful to the environment as a 150 year old oak.

      Maybe in the Midwest there's plenty of farmland or pastures available for developing, but in everywhere I've lived in the southern US most new housing development have come at the cost of native forests.

    14. Re:Duh by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      Can't help but wonder if it might also be that you don't have to be near a place that grows peanuts, but simply near a gas station. The recent ability to buy foods from anywhere has to affect the numbers.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    15. Re:Duh by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      True, but in my case I developed allergies by playing in the compost as a kid. We had a massive compost with leaves and grass clippings and we would climb around in it.

    16. Re:Duh by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.

      I think your evidence that anecdotal evidence is anecdotal is itself anecdotal.

    17. Re:Duh by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      I do not think he was talking about moving to the burbs. Think 150 foot setbacks 7 acre min building lots, once every 20 year subdivision (1 into 2 unless it's family) towns with a single stop light (4 way always blinks red). A real place to live, not mcmansions in the burbs that bulldozed down any tree for miles.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    18. Re:Duh by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      The problem with this theory is that pollen levels are essentially zero during the winter, so *everybody* lives in a "super clean" environment during the winter, whilst only a few start developing allergic reactions in the springtime. Also "super clean" environments at home don't translate to clean environments at schools, where physical contact with others is perhaps higher than in all but the seediest adult venues, though hygiene and personal responsibility are certainly lower. In other words, kids are getting exposed to germs as much as ever. If they seem less sick than 50 or 60 years ago, it's because of immunizations.

      Second, even the best filters don't prevent allergens from coming into the house. Opening doors and/or windows creates a constant supply of pollen and other particles. IIRC, a 50% reduction of allergens in indoor air is considered very good, which is a far cry from a clean room.

      Third, allergens are typically not "something [the body] hasn't encountered before," but rather pollens and particles that the body *has* encountered before. Moving to a new region or continent with previously unknown pollens typically results in the reduction or elimination of allergic reactions in the short term (months or years), though symptoms usually return after time.

      And finally -- though more of a comment on TFS than anything you said -- "increased immune function" is exactly what you *don't* want when it comes to allergies, because allergic reactions are nothing more than an overblown immune response.

    19. Re:Duh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Nice anecdote. It's worth less then a used gum wrapper.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:Duh by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Also because the modern relatively-insulated "clean" environment prevents selection against individuals with immune disorders (allergies are, as another poster puts it, essentially an overblown immune response), allowing them to breed more successfully than they would in an "all natural" environment.

      Any time there is failure to select against a genetic defect, its prevalence will increase.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    21. Re:Duh by russotto · · Score: 1

      It has increased a monoculture of trees in the form of stripped native forests that have been replanted with pulpwood trash pines.

      Pines? The suburbs aren't just full of pines. Plenty of oak, walnut, and maple, for instance.

      DAGS on the American Chestnut tree to see what can happen to a monoculture.

      The American Chestnut was (and is) not a monoculture; it is a native plant developmentally stunted by a foreign fungus. Same goes for Dutch Elm disease; it attacks a wide variety of elms.

    22. Re:Duh by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      A different theory I've seen is that humans coevolved with parasitic hookworms and the like. Deliberately infecting people with overactive immune systems with small amounts of hookworms often results in a more reasonable degree of immune response, as the parasite damps down the immune reaction to ensure its won survival.

      The theory is, of course, that people in parasite-heavy areas got selected for more and more active immune systems to compensate for parastic infection, resulting in dysfunction when the parasites are removed.

      People who work in clean room for chip manufacturing and the like for a few hours a day have noticeable differences in immune function as well.

    23. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but the hookworm parasite, which used to be (and still is, in some parts of the world) very widespread, directly manipulates the host's immune system. Some people have been infecting themselves with hookworm to relieve extreme allergies, and it seems to work.

      RadioLab recorded a fascinating report about it:
      http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/episodes/2009/09/25/segments/133980

    24. Re:Duh by brm · · Score: 1

      Of course that couldn't have anything to do with allergic parents getting the hell off the farm where they were miserable and couldn't breathe and into a relatively sterile city with lower pollen counts, where they pass their hereditary allergies on to their children (some claim 50% of allergies are hereditary).

      It seems trite, but apparently it must be said yet again: Correlation is not causation!

      On a related note, I've always thought it funny to see speculative theories based on the apparent finding that children with dogs develop fewer allergies. My daughter will certainly never have a dog while she's living with me (I got severe hives and asthma last time I stayed at the house of a friend who has a dog). But she is quite likely to develop severe allergies like me and my father. Coincidence?

  6. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the author not understanding that an elevated white blood cell count means you're fighting off parasites and infection. Likely the one's crawling up into your urethra or anus.

  7. No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Great outdoors good for you. News at 11. What would we do without science?

  8. autoimmune by gtvr · · Score: 1

    I assume this would be bad if you have an autoimmune disorder.

    1. Re:autoimmune by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      It might very well prevent it. See it this way: your body has an army. And it needs an army, as all kind of illnesses try to invade it. But if an army has nothing to do, it will have a mutiny. Turn against its master. That is very well what an autoimmune disease is. So keep your immune system busy, but don't overdo it.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  9. The Happening? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    In Reverse? Trees helping keep us alive? They should be trying to kill us.

    1. Re:The Happening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how it works. The increased white blood cell levels indicate that the immune system is defending the body against something. Going into a "dirty" environment which is chock full of parasites, spores and bacteria to which our body is evolutionary adapted is like a training session for the immune system. They are trying to kill us, but we know how to fend off the attack and improve our health in doing so.

    2. Re:The Happening? by fabioalcor · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're cultivating us, just to eat us fat in the end...

    3. Re:The Happening? by gtvr · · Score: 1

      "How to cook humans" no wait... "How to cook FOR humans"...

    4. Re:The Happening? by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      "How to cook FORTY humans"

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    5. Re:The Happening? by ekgringo · · Score: 1

      No wait, "How to cook FOR forty humans!"

    6. Re:The Happening? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Thank the Ents. Without them we'd have all been dead a long time ago!

    7. Re:The Happening? by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      And now we've made Serak the Preparer cry.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  10. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming (reasonably) that this is likely mediated by stress, it isn't anything new.

  11. Different types of forests by Rooked_One · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the Midwest, our forests are just plain nasty... I would be surprised if the Japanese have anything close to ragweed. My family is originally from up north, so we are all allergic to this, but correlation does not blah blah blah

    .I wonder if they have to worry about ticks, with all the fun stuff they carry, as well over there on that island. I'm thinking the plant life just might be different. I grew up playing in a greenbelt full of poison ivy and ragweed, along with scrub trees that put off that layer of pollen that will cover your car, so after RTA, I can't say which side of the coin I prefer I'm afraid.

    1. Re:Different types of forests by mac84 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, there are lions and tigers and bears!

    2. Re:Different types of forests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, there are lions and tigers and bears!

      But not when you're in Kansas!*

      *Of course the definition of "forest" in Kansas is more than a half dozen trees and bushes within a mile of each other.;)

    3. Re:Different types of forests by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      .I wonder if they have to worry about ticks, with all the fun stuff they carry, as well over there on that island.

      Bah, I live right beside the state game preserve, and walk my three dogs through the woods all the time. I've pulled two ticks off me in the last week alone. Big deal. They're nasty little things, but I haven't known anyone who's ever actually gotten a disease from one. I'm pretty sure the risk is way overstated. The poison ivy and such are what I would be more worried about. But then again, I believe it said they were walking in a park. So you stay on the path and you won't have to deal with ticks or ivy or anything like that.

    4. Re:Different types of forests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Pacific Northwest Temperate Rain Forest reporting in, all other forests can suck our Douglas Firs.

    5. Re:Different types of forests by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've pulled two ticks off me in the last week alone. Big deal. They're nasty little things, but I haven't known anyone who's ever actually gotten a disease from one. I'm pretty sure the risk is way overstated.

      Depends on what part of the country you're from.

      Here in NJ (also in NY, CT, and some other states) Lyme disease is super common. I've had it four times, the second time as a kid I got no bullseye rash and it went undiagnosed for two years... I have some paralysis on the left side of my face (Bell's Palsy) and joint problems because of it -- never mind the treatments for depression that took me several years to get over (in any patient, it's hard to say if the Lyme Disease caused the depression... but aggregate among Lyme sufferers, there is a huge increase in incidence of depression and related conditions).

      I could easily rattle off at least a dozen of my closer acquaintances who've had it, and every member of my immediate family has had it, as well as most of my extended family.

      The ticks that tend to carry Lyme disease aren't those wood ticks that you feel crawling on you, and can spot easily from a couple yards away on a pant leg. They tend to be the size of poppy seeds.

      Oh, I also got RMSF from a tick when I was fishing in eastern Washington State.

      Count yourself lucky if tick-borne illnesses are rare where you live. They are no joke where I live. And staying on the path won't necessarily help you, *especially* in a park, where the woodland-fringe type habitat is often so carefully preserved. If you really want to prevent tick-borne illness, wear white socks, light-colored pants that you tuck into the socks, and use DEET on your socks, shoes and pants. When you come back inside, check yourself carefully for ticks. It's best to have someone else check the parts you have trouble seeing (one of my Lyme disease outbreaks was from a tick that burrowed it's head into my hairy asscrack -- no way I could see it myself)

      Re: poison ivy (and oak and sumac)-- learn to recognize it. It's very easy to identify and avoid.

      Tick-borne illnesses are a real threat in certain parts of the country. Don't dismiss the risk if you're in an area with high prevalence if you're the type who spends time outdoors.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  12. Good news by goontz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've actually been planning a backpacking/primitive camping trip with a buddy of mine for a while now, which was prompted in part by a random feeling of being tired of all the comforts we take for granted, as well as realizing how out of touch the majority of people are (myself included) with nature and the associated skills that come with it (the ones that many of our Dads may have taught us, and we've since forgotten). I'm glad to know that the trip will have these other benefits too.

    1. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up brokeback.

    2. Re:Good news by Organic+Brain+Damage · · Score: 1

      I just got back from a couple of days in the woods. Man, am I now glad I've got all those comforts and I no longer take them for granted. It was 95F and 80% relative humidity (at night) and the bugs were particularly vicious. I'm sure my immune system is now way stronger, but I've got Malaria.

    3. Re:Good news by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just watch out for people playing banjos.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Good news by marqs · · Score: 1

      I recomend you read the book A Walk in the Woods by Bill Bryson. apart from beeing funny it's also informative.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Walk_in_the_Woods

    5. Re:Good news by tibman · · Score: 1

      what a horrible book. The guy is a cultural racist. There was more redneck bashing going on than talks about his failed walk. About the middle of the story he gets really concerned about the environment and is critical of other people damaging it. But he didn't care when he littered half his pack down the trail.

      I used his book to light my grill a couple times last summer. Quite possibly the worst book i've ever read. But if you don't ever go camping and you enjoy looking down your nose at everyone.. you will love it.

      A better camping book, imo, is Tunnel in the Sky by Heinlein.. and it doesn't even take place on our planet. I apologize to marqs for pooping on his recommendation but that book and I are sworn enemies. I am duty bound to prevent its spread.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    6. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually been planning a backpacking/primitive camping trip

      Aw come on. You don't plan a backpacking/primitive camping trip. You simply pack a backpack, some food/water, sleeping bag, maybe a tent and some spare underwear and go.

      A city trip to, say, Rome, requires planning. But if you start planning a primitive camping trip you're starting out wrong.

    7. Re:Good news by tibman · · Score: 1

      Good for you man! If i may suggest, don't over plan it. Keep a GPS in your pack just in-case.. but just grab a trailmap from wherever you buy your pass. Take 5 min to pick the trails that will take you away from civilization and get you back before dark the next day (or however many days). I usually halve my trail distance because i like to stop and explore (or find a cliff and read a book).

      I would also like to suggest that you don't take a full-size tent. A 10'x10' tarp or bivy is the way to go. Full-size tents aren't worth the weight unless you are staying in one spot for a few days. A small bag of tinder and a cheap lighter instead of a portable gas stove. I also suggest no easy foods like hotdogs. Go for better and more complex meals with all the ingredients sealed in ziploc bags. You will have a lot more time to cook out there than at home. blah blah ok i'm sorry.. i'm sure you have a good idea of what you want and want to do. But the key thing is to get out there and do it. Good luck and happy trails!

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    8. Re:Good news by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      ...but just grab a trailmap from wherever you buy your pass.

      It's almost like another culture altogether; buying a pass to go backpacking, heck buying a map even. I used to take a compass and head off into a nice big chink of the unexplored and uninhabited state owned land. Follow game trails and streams for a few days making something vaguely like a loop so I'd get back to my vehicle eventually. Some people had plat maps they'd bring, but I'd never even heard of the idea of buying a "pass" or trail map. It was a sad day when a book on fishing published a map to my favorite forgotten lake, billing it as the best secret spot in the state for lake trout. Previous to that, the only people I'd ever seen there were some crazy militia guys playing soldier, and that only once.

      Okay, now I'm rambling. All of your suggestions are excellent. He did say "primitive" so let me add, if you're going to "live off the land" bring a couple cans of food or MREs as backup. Some weeks there just isn't much game about and you can only eat so many berries before it becomes a bad scene. Also, you travel much shorter distances in a day if you're stopping to fish and clean game and cook native plants well enough that they taste reasonable.

    9. Re:Good news by delinear · · Score: 1

      I guess he means planning a time when both he and his friend can take time off, from work or family committments or whatever - for many of us these days it's not simple to just drop everything and head off into the woods for a few days, and that's probably half the problem.

    10. Re:Good news by tibman · · Score: 1

      haha, yeah.. i've never gone that "primitive". I'll fish if i'm on a kayak or canoe.. but never hunted anything for food (crayfish sometimes.. but doesn't really count).

      The passes aren't for permission really, but more like a use fee. So they can keep the trails clear/clean and provide trashcans at trailheads and stuff. I use to just go out into nearby forest but lately i've enjoyed the Red River Gorge area and you absolutely cannot just go for a random hike.. you would certainly die, haha. Trailmap is a must in that place. Some of the most bizare land to walk through.

      The downside is douchebags on the trail with you. Once i was just finished breaking camp and this guy comes into the area searching for stuff. He found a couple tent stakes and scooped them up and started huffing and puffing. I didn't leave them and certainly didn't know they were there. He just took the stakes and walked off, head held high. If he would have confronted me with that attitude, i'm sure i would have hurt him. The whole thing was so intrusive.

      Anyways, here are the trails i enjoy most: http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/boone/documents/maps/rrg.pdf

      And if you think they don't look difficult, checkout the topo: http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/boone/maps/topos/83slade.pdf Makes my spine hurt looking at it, hah.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  13. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not really, I remember reading similar (but more generic) findings nearly 10 years ago - in general, more exposure to foreign things tends to lead to a stronger immune system. This follows pretty directly from that, I think.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  14. Vitamin D deficiency? by GoooF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Vitamin D is a very potent vitamin which the body only can produce in direct exposure of sunlight and is stored in the fat of the body.
    It also exist in a small range of foods.
    The problem is when you don't get any exposure of sunlight and you don't eat any food which contain vitamin D.

    Vitamin D deficiency has been seen to result in a wide range of consequences such as Osteomalacia, Rickets, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's disease, depression and low immune defence.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_D

    As you all know old people mostly cover up their body to not get cold, which in result leads to very little sun exposure.

    I am not saying it is an universal cure, but I wonder if it can have a connection??

    1. Re:Vitamin D deficiency? by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Interesting but not really relevant.

      The article is not about being outside in the sunlight but about being in a forest (i.e. "in nature") as opposed to a city.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    2. Re:Vitamin D deficiency? by NealBScott · · Score: 1

      Since you do get more sunshine on a beach than in a forest, I do wonder what affect other outdoor venues have on your immune system. After all, the sounds of waves crashing on shore is relaxing enough to reduce stress hormones, and certainly a beach offers plenty of sunshine for vitamin D (and sunburns!)

    3. Re:Vitamin D deficiency? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      AH yes, Vitamin D will save us from everything! Wee how, buy some today!

      DO you even understand how little sunlight you need to get a proper amount of vitamin D?

      The Japanese diet would lend itself to the idea that they have plenty of Vitamin D.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Vitamin D deficiency? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      Your repeatinbg outdated informaton (even if it is also all over the web, sadly). The US RDA for vitamin D is probably somewhere between ten times too low and one hundred times too low, which is where that misinformed calculation came from. For better information, see:
          http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/vitaminDPhysiology.shtml
      """
      Studies show that if you go out in the summer sun in your bathing suit until your skin just begins to turn pink, you make between 10,000 and 50,000 units of cholecalciferol in your skin. Professor Michael Holick of Boston University School of Medicine has studied this extensively and believes a reasonable average of all the studies is 20,000 units. That means a few minutes in the summer sun produces 100 times more vitamin D than the government says you need! As discussed in other pages, this is the single most important fact about vitamin D.
          The skin does another amazing thing with cholecalciferol. It prevents vitamin D toxicity. Once you make about 20,000 units, the same ultraviolet light that created cholecalciferol begins to degrade it. The more you make, the more destroyed. So a steady state is reached that prevents the skin from making too much cholecalciferol. This is why no one has ever been reported to develop vitamin D toxicity from the sun, though it is possible when taking vitamin D orally.
      """

      Darker skins may taked up to ten times longer to reach that level, BTW. Unintentionally, the advice you are repeating may even have caused the autism epidemic (since pregnant women not getting enough vitanmin D has been linked to autism)

      So, you are just repeating outdated misinformation, sorry -- and it is misinformation that is literally sickening and killing millions of indoor tech professionals (especially ones who are odler, have darker skins, and live in northern areas) as well as their children. And it is not something I understood myself until faily recently, so don't feel too bad about it. But now you know...

      A blood test is ideal to know for sure:
          http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/why-rda-for-vitamin-d.html

      The only reason vitamin D is a wonder drug is that we are all so unnaturally deficient of it given our recent (last 50 years) lifestyle shift to mostly indoors activities and travel in enclosed vehicles. Even people who live in the south may be vitamin D deficient if they cover up most of the time and stay indoors in air conditioning while surfing the web instead of the ocean.

      This is a major public health issue and occupational hazard for any indoor worker that is juct becoming better understood (even though 100 years ago people like Herbert Shelton used sunlight as a cure for some diseases). Dermatologists advising people to stay out of the sun (without alos recommending adequate supplements on the order of 5000 IU D3 daily for most people and regular blood testing) have caused vast amounts of health problems even as they do save us from a few skin cancers.

      Also useful for good health related to eating patterns: http://www.drfuhrman.com/

      With that said, there are some rare health conditions where vitamin D supplementaton may be problematical -- see that first site for more details.

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  15. 3 week intelligence buff as well by izomiac · · Score: 2, Informative

    Scientific American recently did an article about the soil bacteria mycobacterium vaccae, which you're likely to be exposed to in a forest. Apparently it gives mice a temporary, but fairly large boost in maze solving ability. No clue if it applies to humans as well, but there's certainly no harm in getting out of the city every once in a while.

    1. Re:3 week intelligence buff as well by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

      I remember getting off the bus at Port Authority after finishing the Long Trail. I think they should try this experiment with a maze really crowded with thousands of different rodents, most of which are hopped up on drugs and running around the maze as fast as they can, and the rest of which are carrying guns and looking at you funny. And the pizza is terrible. I bet those forestified mice wouldn't do so hot.

  16. Anedcotal evidence by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    I used to get allergies (hay fever) all the time. I worked at a scout camp where we slept in canvas tents, so we were outside 100% of the time. The first year I worked there I benadryl-ed myself up all the time until I ran out, and the trading post ran out. I had to suffer with only facial tissues... but after a day they went away. And didn't come back for 2 weeks. 2 weeks later, I had allergies, but this time did not medicate. Then I went another 2 weeks... so I just learned to suffer a day and have 2 weeks of unmedicated joy.

    Fast forward to 20 years later... I still have allergies, but I bought a convertible. I like the air. Even on these 100degree days, it is top down. My hay fever has virtually been eliminated.. I *might(* get something in the spring, but this past spring I made it through without any problems.

    I think that in the absence of stimulus, the body cranks up the sensitivity to the point that it goes crazy. This seems to be confirmed by Helminthic therapy, where you purposely infect yourself with parasites (of a specific species with low risk) and these buggers help manage your immune response. But this helminthic therapy advocates say it treats "diseases of civilization" like asthma, which is never found in the undeveloped world.

    So spending time outdoors seems to be a help to reconsult the environment that the body functions best in.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:Anedcotal evidence by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I don't know about this "helminthic theory" (most of that sort of cure-all is a load of hooey) but there is recent research on roundworms in dogs:

      The question arose -- if they're a parasite, and a problem, why are they universal? turns out they're actually closer to a symbiote, and that having a few roundworms at a very early age helps stimulate a puppy's immune system. (Dogs on a high-meat diet do not develop an overload of roundworms; roundworm overgrowth is actually a result of the worms being protected by large amounts of water and mucus in the stool, generally due to high fibre or soy-based diets.) After a year or so a dog with a normal immune system will develop antibodies and eject the remaining intestinal forms, tho some still at the muscle-cyst stage will remain to infect the next generation (they cross the placenta).

      It is possible to entirely eliminate roundworms in two generations, simply by worming puppies at 10 and 20 days of age. But (20 years before the research came out) I'd found this was not a good idea, because those totally roundworm-free puppies tended to have digestive issues, and had to be given yogurt to get things working correctly. I'd concluded that at least SOME exposure to roundworms was good and necessary.

      Pinworms (a very similar form of ascarid) probably fulfill the same function in humans: About 30% of school-age kids (from a variety of environments) tested in the U.S. were found to have pinworms, with NO symptoms whatsoever. That's too widespread to be simply a contaminant.

      However, it's probably not a good idea to infect yourself with pinworms as an adult; there's some thought that the correct immune response only occurs in juveniles whose immune system is still developing.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Anedcotal evidence by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      The worms that are chosen for Helmintic therapy come in two varieties.

      The both are tound worms - the major difference is life cycle and life span. The "cheap" ones you injecst capsules of ovum and they hatch and last for 2 weeks in your gut, then you pass them.

      The more expensive ones are transdermally applied, that is they borough through your skin (as microscopic larva) and migrate to the lungs, then you cough them up and swallow them (instinctively) where they live in your gut for 5 years.

      Both parasites cannot reproduce in the body - their eggs need to leave your body in order to be come viable, so there is no risk of them getting out of control nor is there any risk of infecting anyone. It takes time (days) outside the body for the ovum to become viable.

      Both parasites attach to your small intestine and consume 0.1ml of blood a day. So as long as you are not anemic, you'll be fine. A typical dose of about 50 organisms, and 5ml of blood is well within acceptable limits.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    3. Re:Anedcotal evidence by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Okay, knowing what I do professionally about parasites -- the entire description is bogus on both counts. I'd guess there is actually nothing in the supplied capsules, other than some chemical irritant like "hot sauce".

      Roundworms don't attach to anything, they live free in the intestine. Their lifespan is a few weeks. The encysted stage does come out in the lungs and is coughed up and swallowed, to become mature roundworms. Eggs are passed in stool and any touch is sufficient to contaminate. They can live in the ground, or encysted in muscle tissue, for years. Some lung damage does result from long-term infections.

      Large roundworms, not being a human-based species, are likely to take a wrong turn and wind up in an eye or the brain. So they are not especially safe as an infective agent.

      The only ones I can think of that drill through the skin, then attach to the intestine and drink blood, are hookworms. They can cause anemia severe enough to be life-threatening, especially in children. They are most definitely NOT a symbiote, let alone a "safe" parasite. Far as I know they do not generate an immune response.

      Tapeworms also attach to the intestine, but don't drink blood. The common flea is part of their lifecycle (eat a flea and get tapeworms). Not usually harmful unless there's an overload, at which point malnourishment and diarrhea can result. However, they also do not generate any immune response. Getting rid of the heads, once embedded, can be very difficult.

      At any rate, it sounds like what's being floated is somewhere between snake-oil and dangerous, depending on whether there are any real parasites in the mix, which I expect examination with a microscope would prove there are not, or at most only killed/fixed eggs (easy enough to come by, just run a mass float on any livestock stool).

      [Note: I am a professional dog breeder/trainer with 40 years experience; I deal with this sort of thing routinely.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Anedcotal evidence by juhaz · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you got the idea that this is supposed to be a cure-all, it's not. There's some promising research on few specific autoimmune disorders - mostly on Crohn's disease - and a lot more ongoing on this, the theory is pretty sound, not quackery (though it's probably too early to tell if it turns out to work, so the same can't necessarily be said for the peddlers).

      The helminths used are hookworms and whipworms. As you say, hookworms can cause anemia, and I think the same is true for trichuris as well, but that's because in "natural" infestations there are often thousands of them. AFAIK, it's been pretty well established in parasitology long before anyone thought they might have any benefit that infections with small number of worms are almost always asymptomatic. The species used aren't capable of causing autoinfection either so the load stays constant. It does appear reasonably safe - and the drugs for getting rid of the darn things are well known and very effective if someone does go wrong.

    5. Re:Anedcotal evidence by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Once you've had hookworms, you may need to be on ivermectin for the rest of your life. You're never quite done shedding cysts. Ivermectin is fairly safe, but are they testing long-term use candidates for MDR1 first?? Quite possible that this defect is in the human species (I haven't heard one way or the other but most canine genetic defects have a human analog).

      Someone just told me about a case where someone with Crohn's Disease nearly died from hookworm, which had recurred from cysts due to his immune system being out of whack, but was not diagnosed until nearly too late, the hookworm being masked by the Crohn's symptoms.

      I've seen enough whipworm infections in dogs to know that this is one of those where with even a "light" infection is a bad thing. Unthriftiness and uncontrollable projectile diarrhea are typical symptoms, with colitis over the long term due to intestinal damage. Whipworm eggs also remain alive in the soil more or less indefinitely. While fenbendazole is now used for treatment, in my observation it is not entirely effective; for that you need dichlorvos.

      At any rate, while this may have some promise under completely controlled and monitored conditions, I'd be extremely leery of whatever is coming out of the "natural medicine" camp.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  17. What this article really says.... by rainmouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What this article really seems to be saying is that living in towns and cities is harmful and that hanging out in parks and forests temporarily alleviates the symptoms.

    1. Re:What this article really says.... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      What this article really seems to be saying is that living in towns and cities is harmful and that hanging out in parks and forests temporarily alleviates the symptoms.

      I'd like to keep the towns and cities, but reduce the things that make them harmful. We already have lots of parks and trees here in London (something which surprises lots of visitors), but there could be a lot more. We also have lots of cars and aircraft.

      I work in one of the least polluted parts of London -- next to the river and a very large park. I live about 200m from one of the large commons. The change in pollution is very noticeable whenever I'm not in either of these places. However, even in a park in London the pollution is still many times worse than in the countryside.

      Little will change until we stop people burning oil in the streets.

    2. Re:What this article really says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Connor MacLeod grew up in the country... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connor_MacLeod

    3. Re:What this article really says.... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Yep, we'll go back to having the streets run with shit.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:What this article really says.... by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Having just returned from the ten acres of woods across the street, let me assure everyone that "forest bathing" when the temperature is in the mid 90s (35C) sucks. The bugs seem to like it though. Anyway, I don't care what the dog's contract says, this two walks a day thing is hereby suspended until the weather returns to normal.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    5. Re:What this article really says.... by Stone2065 · · Score: 1

      One is tempted to say "DUH!" to then nth volume...

      --
      Stone
  18. Thank you geocaching by wandazulu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While going for a walk in the woods for its own sake is great, it's hard to convince the family and friends, sometimes, that what they really want to do is put down the remote and go for a long nature hike. This is where geocaching is so great; the kids think of it as "searching for treasure", and my friends have taken up the various challenges with excitement ("how are we going to cross the river?" "How are we going to get down from this ciff", etc. Whereas I could never convince them to go before, once there's a challenge, something to find, out there, they're all for it.

    My personal satisfaction came from the fact that two of my friends were so angry about being left behind, or just struggling to keep up in general, that they both quit smoking.

  19. Bullshit by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I grew up on a farm, and the only people who had air conditioning were living in town. I didn't even know what allergies were; none of my friends or anyone in their family had them, until I started making friends with people who lived in town and had air conditioning and super clean houses. THEY had allergies.

    Your unscientific anecdote is negated by my own equally unscientific anecdote:

    I grew up in a small farming village, a tiny population in a state with one of the lowest levels of air pollution, with no air conditioning whatsoever. I had absolutely terrible allergies, up to and including asthma, eyes glued shut due to "sleep" (secretions), and the need for serious medicine that didn't really help much.

    The best thing I ever did was move to a city, get air conditioning, and stay the fuck away from the grass, trees, and other foliage that made my life a living hell. I didn't get allergies from living in the city as you so erroneously imply, I got them from being exposed to pollen in the first place, and short of paving the planet, a large city with relatively little green space is in my experience an ideal environment for those who suffer from Hay Fever, pollution notwithstanding.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  20. Yes but... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    What if the forest is owned by Monsanto?

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  21. The Japanese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...seem to have the ball in the park all around...

  22. Re:Bullshit by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems that your allergies are making your posting finger twitchy - or there's a glitch in Slashdot.

    My great-grandmother grew up in a farming village. There was a group of people who would always get colds around harvest-time; they were widely suspected of being malingerers, but she realized much later that they just had seasonal allergies.

  23. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point that you seem to be missing is that we're talking about general trends here -- not individual anecdotes. As a trend, this is true and does have plenty of scientific evidence to support it. However, as with everything, there are outliers, like people with serious allergies such as yourself. Just because you personally don't fit into the meat of the curve doesn't negate the entire hypothesis.

    And do you really feel the need to sit there reposting your comment every few minutes?

  24. What about the downsides? by mswhippingboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    This article assumes of course, that one does not become subject to a bear attack.

    --
    Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    1. Re:What about the downsides? by archangel9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I grew up in a small bear-farming village, a tiny population in a state with one of the lowest levels of bears, with no bear repellent whatsoever. I had absolutely terrible bear attacks, up to and including death, eyes glued shut due to "blood" (secretions), and the need for serious surgery that didn't really help much.

      The best thing I ever did was move to a city, get bear repellent, and stay the fuck away from the bears, bears, and other bears that made my life a living hell. I didn't get bear attacks from living in the city as you so erroneously imply, I got them from being exposed to bears in the first place, and short of paving the planet, a large city with relatively few bears is in my experience an ideal environment for those who suffer from bear attacks, Manbearpig notwithstanding.

    2. Re:What about the downsides? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      RTFA - this is about walking in the FOREST, not the Castro.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    3. Re:What about the downsides? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      Walk in the forrest, and carry a .50 Desert Eagle then...

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    4. Re:What about the downsides? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Walk in the forrest, and carry a .50 Desert Eagle then... --

      :)

      Seriously though, those things are fast. I used to hike/hunt/walk though some forest with a lot of bears in them. I used to carry a big pistol even when I wasn't hunting. That said, those critters are fast. More than once, my first indication that they were there was when they suddenly went crashing off through the brush running away from me at high speed. If they'd been coming at me (which the unpredictable critters do sometimes) I doubt I would have been able to draw, aim, and fire in time. DO NOT count on being able to defend yourself against a bear using a firearm. Have another plan as well.

    5. Re:What about the downsides? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Your unscientific anecdote is negated by my own equally unscientific anecdote:

      I grew up on a bear reserve, and the only people who had bear attacks were living in town. I didn't even know what bears were; none of my friends or anyone in their family had seen them, until I started making friends with people who lived in town and had bear repellent and houses. THEY had bears.

    6. Re:What about the downsides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This article assumes of course, that one does not become subject to a bear attack.

      How else does one develop an immunity to bears?

    7. Re:What about the downsides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, may I interest you in the services of the Springfield Bear Patrol?

      Also, I can sell you this tiger-repelling stone...

    8. Re:What about the downsides? by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      That's a bearly legitimate claim without any real scientific research.

    9. Re:What about the downsides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man talking to a friend:

      "So you're taking a .44 magnum with you on your backpacking trip for protection against bears, eh? Be sure to file down the front sight."

      Friend, a little confused, asks: "File down the front sight? Why?"

      "Because then it won't hurt so much when the grizzly shoves it up your ass."

      A grizzly can cover a football field in about 3 seconds. By the time you can hit it with a handgun, it's already making a snack out of your arm.

  25. Is there a pill for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if I can get those phytoncides in a pill or inhaler form.

  26. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was kidding. It's pretty effing obvious that exposing yourself to more foreign elements is going to strengthen your immune system. You can make bugs immune to bug spray by exposing them a lot to it few parts at a time. Now obviously forests are pretty good at having bugs and a bunch of shit that can infect you.

    But hey, I'm glad that some guys got paid to confirm what everyone already knew. (or should)

  27. flawed study by SemperUbi · · Score: 1

    The article by Li et al doesn't show that the forest has anything to do with the change in NK activity. They base their claim that NK activity increased after a forest walk by comparing NK activity to a baseline obtained from the same subjects on a normal working day. Why couldn't the difference have been due to the exercise itself? They should've had a control group of folks taking a city walk, and a third group using treadmills to exercise.

  28. where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know where all the hot women go to bathe in the forest?

    1. Re:where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my first thought as well.

      Uh...better post anon.

  29. le_mot_bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of a f***ing word is "healthful"? Do you Americans always just make up words like this?

    1. Re:le_mot_bizarre by TDyl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, just like "winningest", "mostest" and "druther" - it reminds me of my childhood, when I was 4 or 5 years old.

      --
      Todd: I hope it proves as delicious as the farmers that grew them
  30. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by grub · · Score: 1


    Likely the one's crawling up into your urethra or anus.

    We've been camping for a week and my greased Yoda doll is still there.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  31. WTF? by TDyl · · Score: 1

    I've been going outside, cycling, walking & climbing trees since I was a whoosh in my daddies'... I have spent years of holidays in the German, Austrian and French Alps just enjoying nature and I still find time to code and create webbies (F**K the social media sites though, they reay s**k a**e). The benefits I get from the great outdoors are legion (apart from that snake that one time...) Is it at all possible that one day scientists could study themselves and their grants and come to a determination that they will write s**t for money and "state the bleedin' obvious"?

    --
    Todd: I hope it proves as delicious as the farmers that grew them
  32. Growing up in Europe and America - Kids Outdoors! by JakFrost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Eastern Europe - Outdoor Active Lifestyle

    I grew up in a very polluted coal mining and burning part of eastern Europe and all of us kids spend their entire time outside, except for a few hours of sleeping, parents calling us to come in for dinner, which we would promptly eat and then leave again to play with friends, and the few hours a day that we would be required to be in school, but even then we would have two breaks and lunch which we would spend outside playing. Even during cold and rainy days we would be outside doing stuff with out friends, meeting up under various try spots that we knew outside. There was no air conditioning and I didn't see anyone suffering from any type of allergies or asthma that I remember but I do remember a few sickly kids that would spend their time indoors.

    Our apartment complex in the big city was covered with busy roads and tons cars and commercial traffic, we even had an actual a coal burning plant which would create the hot water for the entire housing compound right in the middle of the apartment complex and we even occasionally venture next to it to play war around there among the dumped burned off toxic leftover coke byproduct of coal burning. However, at the same time our apartment complex was next to a huge park, a farm, and with tons of trees littering the paths between the apartment buildings and throughout the city between every single street. You could walk large parts of the city during light rain and hardly get any wet just by walking under the trees!

    During each 2-month Summer vacation and 3-week or longer Winter vacation my mother would always arrange for me to go on the company sponsored camping and I would then spend weeks at a time away in the mountain and forest areas playing outdoors even more with kids and then go on hikes and outdoor tent camping events on top of being outside. We never did any indoor activities unless it was raining and even then we would find excuses to run outside and get soaking we just for fun. I spend more time getting dirty among nature as a kid then I care to remember.

    United States - Sedentary Indoor Lifestyle

    When I came to the United States later I found that most kids stayed in-doors most of the time and hardly went outside. Being an immigrant child I kept to my roots and hung out with my own kid friends spending our entire summers outside in the parks and going away on lake and camping trips on the weekends with family. The Summer and Winter camps here turned out to cost a lot more money and since they were not sponsored by my mother's work I couldn't afford to go. I tried to spend a much time as possible outside in the summer playing basketball and football with whatever friends were left in the city but since many of them went away I became sedentary and gained weight, then started spending a lot more time at the computer than I should have which in turn decreased my ability to go outside and enjoy myself.

    Now that I move out to another part of the country where there is a lot more outdoor activities I am getting myself involved in outdoor type events so that I can get back to being in nature. Airsoft has become my newest outdoor hobby and I just love the idea of literally crawling through thick woods with a replica gun just to shoot at people and have fun outside while hugging and blending in with the nature. I came out filthy as a dog from that weekend excursion but I was hooked!

    When I have kids I will guarantee that they spend their entire time outside doing activities and go away every Summer and Winter vacation to camps, no matter what I have to sacrifice for myself to afford the cost. I want my kids to be familiar with nature and be comfortable being in the woods like I was.

  33. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Likely the one's crawling up into your urethra or anus.

    Or like the unnecessary apostrophes crawling into your sentences.

  34. being outdoors is now 'forest bathing' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    & civil unrest is now 'domestic terrorism'. as the words change, there's evidence that most of us will be 'heading for the hills' sooner than we may have not thought about such things ever happening.

    as for the outdoors (still) being healthy for us; what a fauxking surprise? we're still thrilled that inf. finally made it in with 'stuff that matters'. wonders never cease?

    meanwhile; the corepirate nazi illuminati is always hunting that patch of red on almost everyones' neck. if they cannot find yours (greed, fear ego etc...) then you can go starve. that's their (slippery/slimy) 'platform' now. see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder

    never a better time to consult with/trust in our creators. the lights are coming up rapidly all over now. see you there?

    greed, fear & ego (in any order) are unprecedented evile's primary weapons. those, along with deception & coercion, helps most of us remain (unwittingly?) dependent on its' life0cidal hired goons' agenda. most of our dwindling resources are being squandered on the 'wars', & continuation of the billionerrors stock markup FraUD/pyramid schemes. nobody ever mentions the real long term costs of those debacles in both life & any notion of prosperity for us, or our children. not to mention the abuse of the consciences of those of us who still have one, & the terminal damage to our atmosphere (see also: manufactured 'weather', hot etc...). see you on the other side of it? the lights are coming up all over now. the fairytail is winding down now. let your conscience be your guide. you can be more helpful than you might have imagined. we now have some choices. meanwhile; don't forget to get a little more oxygen on your brain, & look up in the sky from time to time, starting early in the day. there's lots going on up there.

    "The current rate of extinction is around 10 to 100 times the usual background level, and has been elevated above the background level since the Pleistocene. The current extinction rate is more rapid than in any other extinction event in earth history, and 50% of species could be extinct by the end of this century. While the role of humans is unclear in the longer-term extinction pattern, it is clear that factors such as deforestation, habitat destruction, hunting, the introduction of non-native species, pollution and climate change have reduced biodiversity profoundly.' (wiki)

    "I think the bottom line is, what kind of a world do you want to leave for your children," Andrew Smith, a professor in the Arizona State University School of Life Sciences, said in a telephone interview. "How impoverished we would be if we lost 25 percent of the world's mammals," said Smith, one of more than 100 co-authors of the report. "Within our lifetime hundreds of species could be lost as a result of our own actions, a frightening sign of what is happening to the ecosystems where they live," added Julia Marton-Lefevre, IUCN director general. "We must now set clear targets for the future to reverse this trend to ensure that our enduring legacy is not to wipe out many of our closest relatives."--

    "The wealth of the universe is for me. Every thing is explicable and practical for me .... I am defeated all the time; yet to victory I am born." --emerson

    no need to confuse 'religion' with being a spiritual being. our soul purpose here is to care for one another. failing that, we're simply passing through (excess baggage) being distracted/consumed by the guaranteed to fail illusionary trappings of man'kind'. & recently (about 10,000 years ago) it was determined that hoarding & excess by a few, resulted in negative consequences for all.

    consult with/trust in your creators. providing more than enough of everything for everyone (without any distracting/spiritdead personal gain motives), whilst badtolling unprecedented evile, using an unlimited supply of newclear power, since/until forever. see you there?

    "If my people, which are called by my name, sha

  35. the finding's contrapositive is more relevant by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    Nobody mentions that this study's finding must also mean that spending time *away* from natural environments is remarkably *unhealthy*.

    And I've known this all my life.

  36. Re: 'Forest Bathing' Considered Healthful by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

    I hope this will make up for all the GOTOs I've been using.

  37. Forest bathing? Not on my watch! by khallow · · Score: 1

    I live in an area (Yellowstone National Park) that suffers from widespread Giardia parasites in the water. Drinking infected water can be a ticket to a few days of intestinal hell. I think infection only occurs by ingesting, but bathing in infected water does give you a lot of opportunities to ingest those nasty things.

  38. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All this article affirms is that reducing chronic stress makes people healthier.

    Stress evolved to be an acute reaction to a specific stimuli. When your stress reaction becomes chronic your health suffers.

    Ergo anything that reduces your stress response will improve your health.

    I expect that people who had some type of forest phobia would not receive the same benefit.

  39. open the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even open the article?

    You're new here, aren't you?

  40. Re:Growing up in Europe and America - Kids Outdoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, in Soviet Russia environment is allergic to you?

  41. Maybe not so good for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this mean that if the body's immune system is 'reacting' to the forest environment then the environment is seen by the immune system as harmful?

    Yes it's nice to have a boosted immune system but if the average human physiology reacts like this then people with temporarily weakened immune systems really shouldn't push their luck by wandering around in the woods.

  42. Increased immune function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they experience increased immune function

    50-percent spike in levels of natural killer cells

    an increase in white blood cells

    So when walking in the woods your body apparently starts making stuff to fight off bacteria/viruses/etc.
    Maybe that is because, when walking in the woods, you're being exposed to all that stuff, as opposed to the lifelessness in a house?

    So forcing your body to fight off diseases is healthier than avoiding diseases?

    To me it sounds as if staying at home means you're body won't have to fight off all that crap..

  43. Wha? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    "Another study in 2007 showed that men who took two-hour walks in a forest over two days had a 50-percent spike in levels of natural killer cells, and a third study found an increase in white blood cells that lasted for a week in women exposed to phytoncides in forest air."

    Um, so these walks resulted in increases in 'natural killer cells', increase in white blood cells, and this is good?

    I thought increases in white blood cell count would be a sign of an immune response. As in a reaction to a sensed infection or harmful object/etc. This is good?

    Mind you, I always *do* feel better wieh I have a chance to walk in the woods. But I'm highly allergic to white pine pollen, and have been since before I was 5, and before I was exposed to air conditioning. It's genetic for me. Same with some other plants. But in the main, I'm not allergic to the woods, beyond breaking out in welts if I roll around in the meadow grass or kneel down in pine needles, or push my way through the brush and scratch my skin on any of dozens of species of leaves.

    And I still love the woods, and go out any chance I get. In Arizona, in the high desert, this is not often.

    Yeah, walks in the woods result in increased white blood cell counts. That must be good for you, it's all natural!

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  44. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not astounding at all. Anyone with a simple understanding of the immune system could tell you that increased exposure to germs and all that will increase your immune response.

  45. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by mcvos · · Score: 1

    I just shows how little we understand about the immune system still.

    We understand it sufficiently to know that gets better as it responds to potential threats. Consider vaccines, for example.

    We also know that humans didn't evolve in air-conditioned rooms, but rather outdoors, in forests and savannas.

  46. Named Forest by TheTick21 · · Score: 1

    As a person named Forest, I agree completely. I imagine most people around me would agree.

  47. scientizing Japanese folk medicine by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a discipline called "medical anthropology" which studies the traditional medicine of various cultures and how it interacts with modern medicine. EVERY culture still more or less has its folk medicine: Examples include British interest in colonics (read about Kellog's push to eat grain in the morning), the French and their livers, Germans and their hearts, Indians and meditation, Chinese and acupuncture and so on. And scientists from each culture have conducted medical studies their favorite aspect of folk medicine. To me, most of these studies are inconclusive. Thatis, some benefits, little harm, and not the cure-all promoters were seeking.

  48. What a break through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientists find out that getting away from the fast paced cramped big city rat race lifestyle, away from your home life stress and problems, away from your work stress and problems, and getting a little physical exercise in relative fresh air at the same time is healthy for you. Who would of thunk? They should call this new found concept a "relaxing vacation".

  49. Truth via anecdotal: by AnAdventurer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After living a year in the jungle I returned to Anchorage, Alaska in October just as the ground was starting to freeze. I was feeling a little down and the feeling didn't go away as the snow came, the temps dropped and the daylight waned. In February I looked up sometime around midday and proclaimed "I miss dirt". I know I need to be out there. I feel so much better when I am in the field and afterwards as well. Of course I may be a geek, tech savvy or whatnot, but I am no city boy. I grew up in the redwoods, even lived in a teepee when I was a kid (my dad never owned a computer in his life) and I am more comfortable sitting in the bush then I am sitting at my computer. Life forced my hand so I am forced to do the tech work for my company, but I still get to do the field work too and I swear it gets me a little high (not just the work, the being outside), it lasts for weeks. Sometimes if there is no field work to be done I will drive south until I get to the ocean and find a place with no snow and go lay in the woods on the dirt. Just to be clear, I am no hippy-dippy freak.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  50. a rather simplistic view of history? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    History is not as simple as that. Humans have a very complex history of migration and evolution over the last 200,000 years or so.

    The world does not neatly divide into "forest people" "mountain people" "ocean people" "desert people" "plains people" that are "evolved to live in that environment" etc. outside of neatly divided computer games.

    Agreed that our ancestors lived outdoors more than us but they moved around a more complex set of environments than just forests. And 2000 years ago, you could find a fair number of urban Europeans who never lived outside of a town or city for their whole lives. Julius Caesar might be upset to hear you describing Rome as a forest....

    1. Re:a rather simplistic view of history? by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But regardless of where we lived, we were around a lot more Natural Stuff. Building materials in relatively raw form, draft animals and their effluvient, street vermin (rats, roaches, etc) and their parasites, basic unprocessed foods complete with whatever contaminants nature (or manure fertilizer) saw fit to distribute.

      I expect a similar finding would result from examining people who spend a lot of time out in any fairly natural environment, exposed to Natural Stuff that in one way or another acts as an immune stimulant.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:a rather simplistic view of history? by joh · · Score: 1

      But regardless of where we lived, we were around a lot more Natural Stuff. Building materials in relatively raw form, draft animals and their effluvient, street vermin (rats, roaches, etc) and their parasites, basic unprocessed foods complete with whatever contaminants nature (or manure fertilizer) saw fit to distribute.

      I expect a similar finding would result from examining people who spend a lot of time out in any fairly natural environment, exposed to Natural Stuff that in one way or another acts as an immune stimulant.

      As far as I know it's not so much about having immune stimulants (especially since allergies are a sign of an overreacting immune system you surely don't want to stimulate). The thing is to give the immune system something useful to do because if it's bored out of its mind it starts to turn against random things.

      Infecting yourself with parasites (worms) seems to work surprisingly well against allergies. Your immune system seems to get something real to fight against then and stops to bother about harmless things. Shouldn't come as a surprise anyway since most of the time our bodies evolved we'd have been dealing with parasites anyway. Take them away and things may go wrong...

  51. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by delinear · · Score: 1

    How do you know it was unnecessary and he wasn't contracting the sentence "Likely the one is crawling up into your urethra or anus"? Now, I'm not sure why he'd be suggesting Neo would do such a thing, but it's possible that's what he meant.

  52. Re:Increasing exposure leads to stronger immune sy by delinear · · Score: 1

    This is nothing to do with increased exposure to foreign elements building up a stronger immune system. If you want that, the best place to get it is staying in your air conditioned office and sharing everyone else's germs. This is about time spent in a more natural environment promoting a healthy mental state, which in turn helps the body fight off illness and counters the effects of disease. What illnesses are you expecting to be exposed to in a forest that will boost your immune system? Illnesses that affect humans tend to be prevalent in areas more densely populated by humans, not in the middle of nowhere. It might, however, help reduce instances of allergies (pollen exposure, etc) - since I moved to the city I seem to suffer greater and longer bouts of hayfever each year, something I never once experienced as a child living in a semi-rural area.

  53. Re:Growing up in Europe and America - Kids Outdoor by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You grew up as a NORMAL kid, as did I. This coccooned-child thing in the U.S. has only been around for the last 20-25 years, and I agree entirely, it is a bad thing. Kids need to go outside, get dirty, and learn to create their own entertainment, instead of having it thrust upon them.

    And on that note, I recall research about how kids learn: seems learning isn't absorbed and processed during the "work" periods, but rather only during the "idle" periods, when kids are just being kids. So this "go outside, root in the mud, and generally do nothing useful" is not useless at all, but rather quite necessary to normal learning.

    Likely just as true for adults, tho often ignored (maybe that explains why adults have a harder time learning than kids do??) I've found for myself that for every hour doing something Useful, I need an hour of decompression -- go outside and pull weeds, or watch ants, or do something equally "natural" and nominally useless.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  54. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is to be done naked correct?

  55. Scandinavian treats by Johan+Welin · · Score: 1

    This doesn't come as a surprise for us way up north in scandinavia. Regular, year-around, baths in forest lakes and the baltic sea are common treats here. Diving into cold water really takes the every-day-stress out of you. If you ever get the chance to do this, I suggest you take it. Enjoy!

  56. We're just like the Navii by cloakedpegasus · · Score: 1

    Navii:Health positively affected by the forest. Humans:positively affected by the forest. Navii:like to have sex. Humans:like to have sex.

  57. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pffft.. you call that a twitchy posting finger? This is a tw

  58. Exercise and Immunity by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    "AFAIK exersize has never been shown to boost the immune system (someone please correct me if I'm wrong)."

    You're sort of wrong. Moderate exercise boosts the immune system, go over 90 minutes and it's temporarily weakened. Maybe.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  59. Re:Growing up in Europe and America - Kids Outdoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    not only that, but the social skills that come with interactions. I'm constantly amazed at how complex the "rules" get for their games. Considering they had to invent them, compromise, figure out "teams", police themselves, follow them and work out differences, it really does involve a lot of "work". Much better than turning out to be a pasty white, allergic social retard (sorry /.)

  60. Re:Growing up in Europe and America - Kids Outdoor by Reziac · · Score: 1
    An AC who deserves to be seen replied:

    not only that, but the social skills that come with interactions. I'm constantly amazed at how complex the "rules" get for their games. Considering they had to invent them, compromise, figure out "teams", police themselves, follow them and work out differences, it really does involve a lot of "work". Much better than turning out to be a pasty white, allergic social retard (sorry /.)

    Straitly put, but very true.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  61. Re:Growing up in Europe and America - Kids Outdoor by joh · · Score: 1

    When I have kids I will guarantee that they spend their entire time outside doing activities and go away every Summer and Winter vacation to camps, no matter what I have to sacrifice for myself to afford the cost. I want my kids to be familiar with nature and be comfortable being in the woods like I was.

    Here in Germany there is a new kind of kindergarten gaining momentum. It's called "Waldkindergarten" which literally means "forest kindergarten". They just put a small trailer or so somewhere into a forest which is used as a base station to store things, clothing etc. The actual kindergarten though is the forest. The children are outside all day long (with clothing according to the weather), playing and learning things. Almost all children immediately adopt to that. Rain, snow, cold, sun, whatever. Great idea and even much cheaper to put in service.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_kindergarten