If inside doesn't have an ambulance, you need to call 911 first. Then, when 911 is called, and the "real" response is on the way, call the security and let them know 911 is on the way for a medical emergency. They can send something too, or not. But delaying an ambulance response to satisfy security's power trip is a bad decision.
Its clear from the this post that you've had absolutely no first aid training whatsoever. Even someone trained in basic first aid getting there a couple of seconds faster can save lives, security will call the emergency services and guide them to the correct location. If they are remotely competent they will do this faster then you can, whilst allowing you to provide first aid to the person.
If you have three other people with you that is the only time you should consider calling security and an ambulance, and you should call security as the first priority. (One person for first aid - priority one, one person to get better trained people, AEDs, etc and also allow the ambulance access to the site -- priority two, one person to call emergency services directly - probably unneeded but better safe then sorry)
And to amplify this, there is no way a call to 911 is going to only be 30 seconds long.
Either you panic a lot or you have never called 911. Just the other day, I had some bozo pull a knife on me so I was forced to Mace and thumbcuff him. I then called 911 for a police dispatch. I calmly told them what happened, where I was and 20 seconds later they had a unit heading out my way.
And I bet you continued to talk with them whilst they dispatched the unit? This delays first responders from getting to the scene. In a case like this CPR or AED is the most important thing even if it is applied inexpertly. You want the first aid trained people there as soon as possible and that's going to be security.
Security are also going to be able to remove bollards, open gates, etc to give the ambulance access to the building. They will know if there are special teams need for this response (i.e are dangerous chemicals involved) and be able to tell the emergency opperator to dispatch those teams. They will have procedures in place with the ambulance service for how to get access to the campus, etc.
Yep, Telstra is notorious for losing customer data. I give it 12months from when they actually get it working until someone publishes the whole thing, the biggest technical difficulty would be finding somewhere to host the dump.
That being said the law does require the data to be 'encrypted', which seems kinda stupid if they have thousands of systems writing to this database (which I assume they will if they are logging this amount of data). Just shows how the people who wrote the legislation had no understanding of what they where legislating.
I personally find Inkscape has a lot of missing features compared to illustrator (Although I do use it because I don't have an illustrator licence at home).
Who the hell is saying that? I certainly haven't been. Women and men are different, and women by and large do not like to code. Why should we force women to do something they clearly don't enjoy doing? To try and balance out a meaningless diversity pie chart?
If you want an example of real sexism, this part of your post is. It is also incorrect in my experience, some of the best programmers I know are female.
In regard to you point about targeting one particular gender group as being sexist, unfortunately society divides us at a very young age and you need to appeal to kids interests to get them involved. I'm sure there is equally as many (probably more) male targeted programming courses.
It is possible to mathematically vertifiy code (see l4, its expensive and time consuming. But for something like this it would make sense to do it once and do it right.
Whilst that is true, I don't have any say in how the software is setup and have to use it. I'm sure this is the case for many people, so it definitely is a strike against companies implementing reject or spam responses to spf.
It breaks a few mailing (discussion, not advertising) list programs (such as my uni's one) if you send from a SPF protected address because the list server forwards it with you address in the from boxs. Other then that it works well.
At sydney they have sensor activated doors that only open in one direction, and about three sets of them in a row. Problem is the delay on them is way to long, so people can just walk back the other way. Suitcases and turnstiles are not a good combination
C has goto. C has pointers. C pointers can be cast to something that is a different size... most of the disadvantages you've described seem to apply to C as well, care to enlighten me on the difference (other than bad programmers) .
Which companies? As far as I can tell the only companies that are complaining about this are other search engines or other people who compete directly with google in another area (e.g. maps).
In the case of search engines if you search for "search" Google isn't even the top result (Yahoo is...), Google is third. If you search for maps Google Maps comes first (which makes sense as it is probably the one most people link to on websites), followed immediately by whereis. As far as I can tell Google isn't intentionally manipulating the results there products are just more popular so get more links and are hence ranked higher (which is fair, this is how Google ranks everything. It is their core product.)
So in this case they appear to be in the right.
What you fail to consider is that virus generations are much shorter then the generations of multi-celled organisms and that is what speeds up the process significantly,
Alternately he is a US citizen (a lot of ISIS fighters are from western countries). Gets on a plane from a country bordering Syria (say Turkey, which has quite a pours border atm) and lands directly in a major US population centre (say New York). He now can very effectively spread the disease. It is also worth noting that air travel is a brilliant way to spread a disease (hundreds of people trapped on a plane with recycled air for 12hours)
Now a better question is, realistically is it sensible to introduce extra security measures to respond to this? The answer is most likely no.
I wonder how familiar the readers using the kindles where with the device. I imagine that if you are using it for the first time it would be somewhat distracting until you get used to it.
Slashdot Mirror
If inside doesn't have an ambulance, you need to call 911 first. Then, when 911 is called, and the "real" response is on the way, call the security and let them know 911 is on the way for a medical emergency. They can send something too, or not. But delaying an ambulance response to satisfy security's power trip is a bad decision.
Its clear from the this post that you've had absolutely no first aid training whatsoever. Even someone trained in basic first aid getting there a couple of seconds faster can save lives, security will call the emergency services and guide them to the correct location. If they are remotely competent they will do this faster then you can, whilst allowing you to provide first aid to the person.
If you have three other people with you that is the only time you should consider calling security and an ambulance, and you should call security as the first priority. (One person for first aid - priority one, one person to get better trained people, AEDs, etc and also allow the ambulance access to the site -- priority two, one person to call emergency services directly - probably unneeded but better safe then sorry)
And to amplify this, there is no way a call to 911 is going to only be 30 seconds long.
Either you panic a lot or you have never called 911. Just the other day, I had some bozo pull a knife on me so I was forced to Mace and thumbcuff him. I then called 911 for a police dispatch. I calmly told them what happened, where I was and 20 seconds later they had a unit heading out my way.
And I bet you continued to talk with them whilst they dispatched the unit? This delays first responders from getting to the scene. In a case like this CPR or AED is the most important thing even if it is applied inexpertly. You want the first aid trained people there as soon as possible and that's going to be security.
Security are also going to be able to remove bollards, open gates, etc to give the ambulance access to the building. They will know if there are special teams need for this response (i.e are dangerous chemicals involved) and be able to tell the emergency opperator to dispatch those teams. They will have procedures in place with the ambulance service for how to get access to the campus, etc.
Yep, Telstra is notorious for losing customer data. I give it 12months from when they actually get it working until someone publishes the whole thing, the biggest technical difficulty would be finding somewhere to host the dump.
That being said the law does require the data to be 'encrypted', which seems kinda stupid if they have thousands of systems writing to this database (which I assume they will if they are logging this amount of data). Just shows how the people who wrote the legislation had no understanding of what they where legislating.
I personally find Inkscape has a lot of missing features compared to illustrator (Although I do use it because I don't have an illustrator licence at home).
Which is why most android phones require you to enable usb data access every time you connect.
PCIE cards are a tad more complicated to install then thunderbolt devices... (and more scary for the average user)
Most ereaders aren't backlit
Who the hell is saying that? I certainly haven't been. Women and men are different, and women by and large do not like to code. Why should we force women to do something they clearly don't enjoy doing? To try and balance out a meaningless diversity pie chart?
If you want an example of real sexism, this part of your post is. It is also incorrect in my experience, some of the best programmers I know are female.
In regard to you point about targeting one particular gender group as being sexist, unfortunately society divides us at a very young age and you need to appeal to kids interests to get them involved. I'm sure there is equally as many (probably more) male targeted programming courses.
It is possible to mathematically vertifiy code (see l4, its expensive and time consuming. But for something like this it would make sense to do it once and do it right.
Whilst that is true, I don't have any say in how the software is setup and have to use it. I'm sure this is the case for many people, so it definitely is a strike against companies implementing reject or spam responses to spf.
It breaks a few mailing (discussion, not advertising) list programs (such as my uni's one) if you send from a SPF protected address because the list server forwards it with you address in the from boxs. Other then that it works well.
Great man therefore traitor to status quo != traitor to status quo therefore great man.
Because ubuntu dosen't allow new major versions to be added to a distro that has already been released.
heartbleed wasn't a bash exploit, and had nothing to do with the shell you used. The majority of linux distros had /bin/bash as their default shell.
Providing service in network blackspots comes to mind straight away (for a price of course)
That's what they have a sydney. If there is constant traffic on them you could easily walk all the way through in the opposite direction
He walked back through the exit. At Sydney domestic the exit is an unmaned automated system.
At sydney they have sensor activated doors that only open in one direction, and about three sets of them in a row. Problem is the delay on them is way to long, so people can just walk back the other way. Suitcases and turnstiles are not a good combination
Anything that uses bash is exploitable, another example of this being used is to gain root through the dhcp client...
C has goto. C has pointers. C pointers can be cast to something that is a different size... most of the disadvantages you've described seem to apply to C as well, care to enlighten me on the difference (other than bad programmers) .
Which companies? As far as I can tell the only companies that are complaining about this are other search engines or other people who compete directly with google in another area (e.g. maps).
In the case of search engines if you search for "search" Google isn't even the top result (Yahoo is...), Google is third. If you search for maps Google Maps comes first (which makes sense as it is probably the one most people link to on websites), followed immediately by whereis. As far as I can tell Google isn't intentionally manipulating the results there products are just more popular so get more links and are hence ranked higher (which is fair, this is how Google ranks everything. It is their core product.)
So in this case they appear to be in the right.
outbreak and threat do not mean the same thing. Having an outbreak significantly increases the threat (if that is seriously all you care about).
What you fail to consider is that virus generations are much shorter then the generations of multi-celled organisms and that is what speeds up the process significantly,
Alternately he is a US citizen (a lot of ISIS fighters are from western countries). Gets on a plane from a country bordering Syria (say Turkey, which has quite a pours border atm) and lands directly in a major US population centre (say New York). He now can very effectively spread the disease. It is also worth noting that air travel is a brilliant way to spread a disease (hundreds of people trapped on a plane with recycled air for 12hours)
Now a better question is, realistically is it sensible to introduce extra security measures to respond to this? The answer is most likely no.
I wonder how familiar the readers using the kindles where with the device. I imagine that if you are using it for the first time it would be somewhat distracting until you get used to it.