Slashdot Mirror


Man Repairs Crumbling Walls With Legos

Lanxon writes "German-born artist Jan Vormann, 27, has spent the past three years traveling the world repairing crumbling walls and monuments with Lego, reports Wired. His "Dispatchwork" began in 2007 in the small village of Bocchignano, Italy, as part of the contemporary art festival 20 Eventi. Developing the work in situ, he became intrigued by the makeshift repairs that had been made to the crumbling walls. The approach favored function over appearance, reminding Vormann of the haphazard Lego designs created by children."

68 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. dupe?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:dupe?? by TeXMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looks more like a follow-up

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    2. Re:dupe?? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't you mean "Duplo??" ?

  2. Where function meets art by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

    That's pretty cool.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  3. /pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's supposed to be LEGO, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:/pedantic by ChinggisK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh just stfu, that argument is getting so damn old.

    2. Re:/pedantic by Sovetskysoyuz · · Score: 5, Informative
      It's actually a SUPER SRS Trademark issue, to the point that the LEGO Group highlights it on their website:
      http://www.lego.com/eng/info/fairplay.asp

      Proper Use of the LEGO Trademark on a Web Site
      If the LEGO trademark is used at all, it should always be used as an adjective, not as a noun. For example, say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGO BRICKS". Never say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGOs".Also, the trademark should appear in the same typeface as the surrounding text and should not be isolated or set apart from the surrounding text. In other words, the trademarks should not be emphasized or highlighted. Finally, the LEGO trademark should always appear with a ® symbol each time it is used.

    3. Re:/pedantic by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Funny

      It isn't an argument when it is fact.

      People misusing / misspelling brand names is one of the most annoying things ever.

      Worse than cancer and heart disease put together!

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:/pedantic by pimproot · · Score: 1

      The reason for this, no doubt, is that they're trying to prevent "LEGO" from becoming a generic term for little plastic bricks, like how XEROX came to mean "copy" and lost most of its trademark protection.

      Some people don't seem to realize that instructions from a company about how you should refer to it and in what style they want you to advertise their trademark protection are NOT ENFORCED BY LAW. Consider them as requests from a flea shouting at the top of its lungs.

  4. Hmmm by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure if I'd want him repairing monuments with lego blocks. It's like to trying to restore the ceiling of Notre Dame with finger paints.

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry to be a slashdot corrector geek, but you're most likely thinking of the Sistine Chapel...

    2. Re:Hmmm by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Damnit. I knew I wasn't right but after a good 10 minutes of solid thinking I couldn't come up with the actual name.

    3. Re:Hmmm by mopower70 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Damnit. I knew I wasn't right but after a good 10 minutes of solid thinking I couldn't come up with the actual name.

      10 minutes of thinking when the original post was only 6 minutes old? I'd think your ability to see into the future would come with a higher level of accuracy.

    4. Re:Hmmm by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I asked a nearby person. It was 5 minutes of two people thinking, so 10 minutes in man-hours.

    5. Re:Hmmm by mitgib · · Score: 1

      Vinny Gambini: Is it possible the 2 defendants...
      [looks at judge]
      Vinny Gambini: went into the Sac-O-Suds, picked 22 specific items off of the shelf, had the clerk take the money, make change, then leave. Then 2 different men, drive up...
      [Seeing Mr. Tipton shake his head no]
      Vinny Gambini: Don't shake your head I'm not finished yet. Wait until you hear the whole thing you can understand what it is that I'm askin'. Then, two different men drive up in a similar looking car, do into the store, shoot the clerk, rob him, then leave?
      Mr. Tipton: No. They didn't have enough time.
      Vinny Gambini: Why not? How long was they in the store for?
      Mr. Tipton: 5 minutes.
      Vinny Gambini: 5 minutes? How do you know? Did you look at your watch?
      Mr. Tipton: No.
      Vinny Gambini: Oh, oh, oh, you tesitfied earlier that you saw the boys go into the store, and you had just begun to cook your breakfast and you were just getting ready to eat when you heard the shot.
      Mr. Tipton: That's right.
      Vinny Gambini: So obviously it takes you 5 minutes to cook your breakfast.
      Mr. Tipton: That's right.
      Vinny Gambini: That's right, so you knew that. You remember what you had?
      Mr. Tipton: Eggs and grits.
      Vinny Gambini: Eggs and grits. I like grits, too. How do you cook your grits? Do you like them regular, creamy or al dente?
      Mr. Tipton: Just regular I guess.
      Vinny Gambini: Regular. Instant grits?
      Mr. Tipton: No self respectin' Southerner uses instant grits. I take pride in my grits.
      Vinny Gambini: So, Mr. Tipton, how could it take you 5 minutes to cook your grits when it takes the entire grit eating world 20 minutes?
      Mr. Tipton: I don't know, I'm a fast cook I guess.
      Vinny Gambini: I'm sorry I was all the way over here I couldn't hear you did you say you were a fast cook, that's it?
      Mr. Tipton: Yeah.
      Vinny Gambini: Are we to believe that boiling water soaks into a grit faster in your kitchen than anywhere else on the face of the earth?
      Mr. Tipton: I don't know.
      Vinny Gambini: Well, I guess the laws of physics cease to exist on top of your stove. Were these magic grits? Did you buy them from the same guy who sold Jack his beanstalk beans?

      --
      Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
    6. Re:Hmmm by DogPhilosopher · · Score: 1

      So.. you believe in the mythical man minute?

  5. Isn't his the opposite approach? by GoNINzo · · Score: 1, Troll

    He's favoring appearance over usefulness, because his patches are not useful at all. They provide no structural integrity. And besides, they might just fall out when the building crumbles even more.

    Also, someone should have linked to his main site instead relying on 'sticky' linked article, trying to keep you at wired.

    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    1. Re:Isn't his the opposite approach? by oldhack · · Score: 2, Informative

      They say it's art. Did you expect something useful?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    2. Re:Isn't his the opposite approach? by slyrat · · Score: 1

      Well, having done some work with legos to make them more sound structurally, it can work. Essentially if you use pvc pipe glue to melt the plastic of the pieces as you are building it you get a very strong plastic structure. I'm not saying it is anything to rely on like actual building materials, but it can easily hold a lot of weight.

    3. Re:Isn't his the opposite approach? by aedan · · Score: 1

      You can build a whole house with Lego if you want to.

      http://www.topgear.com/uk/photos/james-may-lego

    4. Re:Isn't his the opposite approach? by KumquatOfSolace · · Score: 1

      I have no doubt it is strong enough for small repairs or non-load-bearing walls, but it is not water-permeable. So any moisture in the wall will pool up behind the plastic and errode the remaining mortar and/or bricks.

    5. Re:Isn't his the opposite approach? by binkzz · · Score: 1

      He's favoring appearance over usefulness.

      Did you see the designs? They are just random colour lego blocks put together. If anything, it makes the repaired item look worse.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    6. Re:Isn't his the opposite approach? by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like job security for the guy doing it.

    7. Re:Isn't his the opposite approach? by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      There's no glue. From the artist:

      "At first I thought it would be a complicated procedure to fit the pieces," he said.

      "But as it turned out, the bigger plastic pieces were compatible with the smaller ones, and the Lego held itself in place without any glue whatsoever."

      But despite their sturdy construction, the artworks-cum-repairs aren't meant to last forever.

      "I tried to apply some glue, but, on the dusty patina of the stone, it would not stick," he said.

      "So I decided to just put them up like this, aware of the fact of erosion and the influence of weather.

      "I like the aspect of temporariness that comes into play."

    8. Re:Isn't his the opposite approach? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      He's favoring appearance over usefulness,

      Have you heard of this thing called art? Because that's the purpose of the "repairs", not structural integrity.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  6. Re:Lego [pedantic] by JustOK · · Score: 1

    It's got something to do with the octopi writing virii

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  7. The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aside from the debate over whether the Lego bricks are more sturdy than stone of unknown composition: Which one is cheaper? Lego bricks are pretty damned expensive! LOL

  8. This is what I'm always talking about! by socz · · Score: 1

    This is an excellent example of what I am always saying: with lego(s), you are only limited by your imagination.

    Why stop at making planes and gas stations when you could use them for many other things? Such as cd/dvd racks, cell phone holder, computer cases etc.

    Sometimes, as some will undoubtedly say, it's not what could you do with them but why would you right? If I was to see a corner of damaged wall filled in with lego I would be "that's awesome!" It's also beautiful and breaks up the monotony of grey.

    But more importantly, it inspired and gives people and especially children ideas. As I've said before, I think this is what helped guide me towards engineering/manufacturing (although it is not my profession). What I have learned has helped me out in every job I've had, and it all started with legos.

    There's only 2 downsides to legos: 1) they're expensive to buy even in bulk, 2) you can never find that darn NxN you're looking for!&#*&#*(!!

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    1. Re:This is what I'm always talking about! by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      The plural is Lego.

      Indeed; until I came to slashdot, I'd never head anyone call lego "legos", here in the UK we just make it it's own plural as with words like sheep or deer or fish. I think that "legos" is an American thing.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  9. Re:Expensive by Kaboom13 · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's probably why he is an artist, and not a mason.

  10. Re:Expensive by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    "While kinda neat, aren't Legos expensive? I mean, why not just slap some cement/grout/etc on there? It would cost a fraction of the price and be more structurally sound."

    I guess you missed the part where the guy doing the repairs calls himself an artist. Simply going around doing free masonry work wouldn't be very artsy, would it?

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  11. Re:Expensive by cdpage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually i would like to have seen some grout or something used you cover up some of the Lego.

    It would make some installations look like the whole place was built out of Lego and just covered up.

    Curious question tho... what is the structural integrity of Lego? It can't be all that bad.

  12. Colors by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can see the artist's intention in using bright, random colored logos to say "Look everyone - these are legos!". But I think it would have been vastly cooler (and more "artistic" - and much more difficult) to have matched the color and geometric pattern of the structure he was repairing (extending the mortar joints, etc.).

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Colors by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Agree on both points. Though using Legos for anything this size gets pretty expensive I'd think.

      Maybe he should make custom bricks shaped like big Legos.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Colors by Threni · · Score: 1

      He didn't use Lego in the first place. He used Megablocks or some other shitty poundshop alternative. Lego doesn't look anything like that.

  13. One thing I don't get by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

    TFA states that he's worked with volunteers from "three to 40 years". Who the hell works with three years? Who the hell volunteers?




    Ah, yes,I forgot, this is LEGO we're talking about.

    --
    Have you heard about SoylentNews?
  14. I wonder. by zx-15 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if he can repair my constituency' side wall?

    --Simon

  15. Again, with the corrections... by pewterfish · · Score: 1

    *sigh* Legos, sheeps, fishs...

    Lego bricks. They're Lego bricks. It's a derivative of "leg godt" in Dutch, which means "play well" (source), and a mass noun, not a count noun. How hard can it be to use the correct name for a product?

    [/pedant]

    --
    :D > £/$
    1. Re:Again, with the corrections... by M8e · · Score: 3, Informative

      *sigh*

      LEGO comes from Denmark and "leg godt" is danish.

    2. Re:Again, with the corrections... by M8e · · Score: 1

      And is legos really bricks? Only a few of them brick shaped, and none of them are made of ceramics. They are either called blocks or pieces in the scandinavian languages.

      "A brick is a block of ceramic material used in masonry construction, usually laid using various kinds of mortar." source

      "Legoklods er et stykke legetøj produceret af LEGO siden 1949 efter engelsk forbillede." source

    3. Re:Again, with the corrections... by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      I agree with you with regards to the plural, however it's written as "LEGO", as that's their trademark, the name of the company is "The LEGO Group".

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    4. Re:Again, with the corrections... by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Well, I agree with you as a convenience anyway. The actual plural is "LEGO bricks".

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    5. Re:Again, with the corrections... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It's a derivative of "leg godt" in Dutch, which means "play well"

      Danish. I thought the fad of Americans confusing Dutch with Danish had finally disappeared. How hard can it be to use the correct name for a language?

  16. Re:Expensive by Wiarumas · · Score: 2

    Agreed. That is why i don't think its structurally sound. Water/ice will get in between the brick and the lego and cause further erosion. The lego, while probably capable of lasting a long time, will just plop out like a loose tooth. If he would have grouted the area around the lego, adhering the lego to the existing wall, it would have improved the structure's structural integrity and looked cooler as well. Just my 2 cents.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
  17. old news by MorbidBBQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like he puked rainbow colored bricks into the walls. Any self respecting lego maniac would have color coded it to match the existing materials. And common; "...The approach favored function over appearance..." How are these walls more functional? Did he build secret compartments into them? Is there something going on beneath the surface with lego mindstorms and underpants gnomes?

    Parting thoughts: How does he secure the legos? Glue? Does he cut the lego pieces, or chisel away the wall to provide a flatter surface?

    The story about the kid who builds lego guns is much more interesting than some "artist" who "repairs" walls with legos.
    http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-06/11/working-sniper-rifle,-minigun-and-shotgun-built-from-lego

    1. Re:old news by Macrat · · Score: 1

      How are these walls more functional? Did he build secret compartments into them? Is there something going on beneath the surface with lego mindstorms and underpants gnomes?

      How do you think the gov't listens to your conversations?

    2. Re:old news by MorbidBBQ · · Score: 1

      How do you think the gov't listens to your conversations?

      So Eavesdropping is underpants gnomes' phase 2? Genius!

  18. That's small fries... by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Informative

    James May built an entire house out of Lego. For some reason, he was unsuccessful in selling it, even after living in it overnight.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:That's small fries... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "he was unsuccessful in selling it [google.com], even after living in it overnight."

      not exactly correct, TFA says it was built on a private vineyard (Denbies Wine Estate) with the understanding that Legoland was going to pay to have it moved. When they found out how much it would cost to move they decided they didn't want it and it was torn down. Article does not say if it was up for sale to anyone other than Legoland.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  19. Lego is the company name by Comboman · · Score: 1

    Lego is the company name. The individual toy parts are "Lego bricks" (or blocks) not "Legos". You wouldn't say "Nintendos" in place of "Nintendo games" or "Hot Wheelses" instead of "Hot Wheels cars". I have heard girls say "Barbies" instead of "Barbie dolls", but that is equally incorrect.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Lego is the company name by dolo724 · · Score: 1

      We DO say Nintendos, LEGOs and Barbies. We's all American!

      oh, btw, it's Hot Wheels without the extra -es in our favorite vernacular.

      kthxbye.

      --
      But you just gotta have another sigarette
    2. Re:Lego is the company name by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Kids did, and still do, say Hot Wheels, and Barbies is socially acceptable, even if not an authorized use of the trademark.

      Legos is a hell of a lot more convenient to say and remember than Lego Bricks® and if Lego® the company was smart, they'd simply trademark that as well instead of fighting it.

      The beautiful thing about language not being static, is that people can refer to products in ways other than what the manufacturer specifies. How would you like it if you couldn't say "Windows" or "MS", you always had to say "Microsoft Windows®" and "Microsoft®".

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    3. Re:Lego is the company name by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      In England, we just say "lego", making it its own plural, like sheep. e.g. a house made of lego.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    4. Re:Lego is the company name by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      > How would you like it if you couldn't say "Windows" or "MS", you always had to say "Microsoft Windows®" and "Microsoft®"

      GNU/Linux joke in 3..2..1...

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  20. Re:Lego [pedantic] by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Because it is an adjective, not a noun?

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  21. Re:Lego [pedantic] by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Ford would want you to do that if there was a risk that all cars were referred to as Fords. This is a risk that Lego runs.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  22. Re:No he didn't... by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

    Dude, stop yelling. I'm trying to Xerox some Polaroids of me cleaning my Legos with a Kleenex.

  23. Re:Lego [pedantic] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Then you have to say things like "I drive a Toyota car", not "I drive a Toyota"; "I like Doritos brand corn chips" not "I like Doritos"; "Are you going to the Starbucks coffee shop?", not "Are you going to Starbucks" and many other silly things that will just make you sound very silly. And pedantic. And annoying.

  24. I love this guy by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    He comes up on http://www.thereifixedit.com/ every now and then and always gives me a good chuckle.

  25. Re:Expensive by Macrat · · Score: 1

    I guess you missed the part where the guy doing the repairs calls himself an artist. Simply going around doing free masonry work wouldn't be very artsy, would it?

    I thought "artists" used their own feces?

  26. Same Guy? by azurex120 · · Score: 1

    I think I just saw this guy in Laussanne! http://imgur.com/x9fXD But then again those look like megabloks....

  27. LEGOS by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Is there anything pasta sauce cannot do.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  28. Re:No he didn't... by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Dude, stop yelling. I'm trying to Xerox some Polaroids of me cleaning my Legos with a Kleenex.

    Pasta sauce tends to get everywhere doesn't it?

    To clear this one up, Lego is it's own plural. "I was playing with Lego" is perfectly acceptable when referring to multiple Lego bricks.

    Lego = small plastic bricks, popular with geeks and children.
    Legos = cheap and bland pasta sauce, popular with people who cant cook or taste.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  29. Re:Expensive by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    You can get buckets of cheap knock off bricks which are not technically LEGO.

  30. Re:Expensive by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    A cartridge of silicone might be the answer. Smear it between the bricks and use masses of the stuff to fill the space between the bricks and the existing structure. Even where it won't stick it will tend to hang on to gaps, etc in masonry.

  31. Using Pink by BraksDad · · Score: 2, Funny

    All in all, its just a-nother brick in the wall...

    --
    Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
  32. Re:Lego [pedantic] by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    No you don't, because none of those companies have chosen name their products the same way Lego do.

    Now, like any true Scotsman, I'm going to put some salts on my porridges.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  33. Re:Lego [pedantic] by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    None of those companies have the risk of their brand becoming a generic term.

    As popular as they are people don't say I'm at cosi when at Starbucks.

    This is a real risk for LEGO with many compatible blocks coming out.

    Xerox is a company that had a similar problem, and they too are pedantic about Xerox brand copy machines.

    Driving a Toyota is still used to differentiate "Toyota" vs others, "Doritos" is still used as a differentiator, and even "Starbucks" is used to refer to Starbucks, not coffee shops in general.

    Lego is actually used this way too, but part of it is the companies own vigilance in the issue.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg